IMP-04b Catalog extension to 32 frames #42
Assignees
Kyeongmin (이경민)
Clear assignees
Kyeongmin (이경민)
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2#42
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
관련 step: Step 0, 9 — catalog extension continuation
source: IMP-04 (#4) Track A milestone close + remaining scope split
priority: medium (large, batched)
dependency: IMP-04 (#4) closed at Track A milestone (
73a98b8F17 calibration)scope:
Method (자체 IMP-04 round 73 pause/resume protocol inherit):
Pre-flight 4 axis read baseline (per frame 진입 전 필수 사전 read) :
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104—split_sourceallow-list (top_bullets / h3_subsections)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{frame_id}/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}— source 4 layerssrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:206-265— ITEM_PARSERS (pillar / quadrant / compare_row / 등) 비교scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:486-500— argparse (positional template_id + --render-to)Frame group classification (6 types) :
Batch strategy :
guardrail / validation:
calculate_fitmigrationcross-ref:
15c5b9a/21476ae/23d1b25)review loop:
[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames
📌 Stage 1 Round #1 — pre-flight 4-axis baseline + scope-lock proposal
=== PRE-FLIGHT 4-AXIS BASELINE READ ===
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_sourceallows exactlytop_bullets/h3_subsections. Any new frame must declare one of these or raiseValueError.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{frame_id}/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}assets/). visual-pending frames lackindex.html+assets/.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:206-265(ITEM_PARSERSregistry)pillar_item(F13),quadrant_item(F16 + reused by F14/F17/F11/F18/F20/F28),compare_row_2col_item(F18-style). New parsers required only if pattern not in registry.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:486-543template_id+--self-check+--payload <path>+--render-to <DIR>(R3 acceptance gate).=== BASELINE STATE (factual, value+path+upstream) ===
frame_contracts.yamltop-level keysgrep -n "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlgit ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html(per_WIP_FILES.mdbaseline 2026-05-19)_WIP_FILES.mdL13app_sw_package_vs_solution.html(F23 /1171281203),pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html(F9 /1171281180) —_WIP_FILES.md§"WIP family templates"figma_to_html_agent/blocks/*dirsls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/(excl.layouts.yaml).1171281171has onlytexts.md(noanalysis.md/assets) — likely the 33rd non-target dir; V4 evidence file = 32 unique template_ids--self-checkpython scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check(the 2 SKIPs = WIP partials with no bundled fixture)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyframe_contracts.yamlkeys set-equal modulo_WIP_FILES.mdallowlist73a98b8(F17 =bim_current_problems_paired, Track A 8/16)git log --grep="Track A"→ guardrail "Smoke 11/11+ PASS — IMP-04 F17 calibration regression 0" is currently green. IMP-04b must preserve this on every commit.
=== SCOPE-LOCK CLARIFICATIONS NEEDED ===
Q1 — Track A "잔여 5" vs matrix "9 remaining reusable-now" (numerical discrepancy)
Issue body:
Track A 잔여 5 + Track B 12 + Track C 1 = 18. But scope summary saystarget = remaining 21/32 frames (active 11/32 → 32/32)→ 32-11 = 21.docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md§3.1 lists 16 reusable-now; commitsTrack A 1/16 ~ 8/16activated 8 (one of which = F14 refinement, already-active). Cross-checked against catalog: of the §3.1 16 frames, 9 are not yet contracted:app_sw_package_vs_solutioncompare_table_2colbigroom_system_componentsprocess_product_pairor newbim_adoption_central_splitcentral_split_synthesisengn_sw_three_typescompare_table_3col(h3_subsections)model_specialized_engn_swsplit_paneloverseas_bim_numbered_listitems_with_rolevariant (numbered)pre_construction_model_info_stackeditems_with_role(flexible card)solution_engn_split_diagramsplit_panelsw_development_cycle_six_nodescircular_nodes_n→ Track A actual remaining = 9 frames (not 5). Need user lock on either (a) tighten Track A to a specific 5 subset and defer 4 to a follow-up axis, or (b) correct issue body scope to "Track A 잔여 9 + Track B 12 = 21". The 3-frame phrasing-vs-target gap should not silently propagate into Stage 2 plan.
Q2 — 2 WIP partials = Track A scope or Track B-adjacent fast lane?
_WIP_FILES.mdL5 explicitly states: "Gate for promote/remove: Gitea issue #42". The 2 WIP files (app_sw_package_vs_solution.html,pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html) already have R3 partials authored but are NOT inframe_contracts.yaml. Promotion = 4 deltas per file:frame_contracts.yaml(incl. SPEC v1 §3accepted_content_types+sub_zones)PAYLOAD_BUILDERS(if new) — matrix §5.3 saysapp_sw_package_vs_solutionneeds newcompare_table_2colSELF_CHECK_FIXTURESpayload inscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyso smoke flips from SKIP → PASS_WIP_FILES.mdWIP allowlist + verifytests/test_family_contract_baseline.pystill 2 passed→ recommend these 2 be the first batch of IMP-04b: largest "head-start", lowest risk, exercises the promote/remove protocol that
_WIP_FILES.mdwas designed to gate.Q3 — Track C "1 matching schema canonical" scope-in or scope-out?
IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md§4 Track C: "본 matrix scope 외. IMP-05+ 또는 별 architectural axis 로 이양." IMP-05 (#5) already closed (per issue body15c5b9a/21476ae/23d1b25). Issue #42 body offers two paths ("Track C 1 matching schema canonical (or separate IMP axis if scope grow)"). Recommend explicit out-of-scope for IMP-04b unless user override — matching authority belongs to V4, not Phase Z runtime catalog (memoryproject_design_agent_status.md).Q4 — New builder pattern entry per frame = own scope-lock axis?
Matrix §5.3 lists 7+ new builders for the 9 remaining Track A:
compare_table_2col,compare_table_3col,cycle_intersect_3(already done?),split_panel,circular_nodes_n,paired_rows_2x2(done as F17),central_split_synthesis. Per IMP-04 Fix 5 "review granularity":→ each new builder = its own batch with full F1/F2 deep review, NOT folded into the "baseline/smoke batch (~3-5 round)" cadence. Suggest the issue distinguishes upfront between (a) builder-introducing frames (deep review) and (b) builder-reusing frames (checklist short-review).
Q5 — RULE 0 PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION + sample budget guardrail
Each new contract must work for all 32 frames (= general Phase Z pipeline), not just whichever MDX surfaces the test fixture. Memory
feedback_sample_budget.mdwarns: "regression fix step 에 미사용 샘플 끼우지 말 것 — fresh first-encounter 신호 보호". Verification approach proposal:SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES= structural sufficiency check (StrictUndefined cap), not generalization proof.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml(already produced by V4 against 320 judgments). New contracts should map cleanly to one of the 32 source-truth shapes there.=== 6-GROUP CLASSIFICATION — APPLIED ===
Mapping the 9 Track A candidates against the issue body's 6-group taxonomy (source 4-layer fit-class):
engn_sw_three_types(h3_subsections → table-3col),bim_adoption_central_split(central split synthesis)app_sw_package_vs_solution,pre_construction_model_info_stacked(WIP partials authored, refinement pass)sw_development_cycle_six_nodes(circular nodes — likely SVG asset),solution_engn_split_diagram(split panel)bigroom_system_components,overseas_bim_numbered_list,model_specialized_engn_sw(subject to per-frame analysis)→ deep-review 1 representative per group (per issue body): groups 2/3/4 each take 1 deep review, groups 5 short checklist. Group 1/6 = on-demand only if encountered.
=== SCOPE-LOCK PROPOSAL (Stage 1 → Stage 2) ===
Recommended scope-lock (subject to user Q1 answer):
target = remaining 21/32.project_design_agent_status.md).app_sw_package_vs_solution,pre_construction_model_info_stacked) — exercises the promote/remove protocol of_WIP_FILES.md+ teststests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyinvariant + flips smoke SKIP → PASS for both.figma_to_html_agentre-run required before catalog entry. Stage 2 should isolate the "extraction pre-req" sub-axis from the "catalog registration" sub-axis (Track B = NOT immediate activation).Guardrails accepted from issue body:
calculate_fitmigration (memoryfeedback_phase_z_qy_framing.md)feedback_ai_isolation_contract.mdPZ-1)feedback_sample_budget.md+ RULE 7)Additional guardrails (proposed):
feedback_workflow_atomicity_rules.md: 1 commit = 1 decision unit)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml, NOT from per-frame ad-hoc fixtures=== EVIDENCE ===
commands run:
Read templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(200 lines + grep top-level keys → 11 entries)Read templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md(verified 11 contracted + 2 WIP, gate-keywordGitea issue #42)Read docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md(lines 1-299 — §1 stats, §3.1 16 reusable-now, §3.2 12 visual-pending, §4 tracks, §5 builders, §7 resource completeness)Read src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104, 206-265(split_source allow-list + ITEM_PARSERS registry)Read scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:480-547(argparse + --render-to mode)Bash ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/ → 33 dirs, all 9 Track-A-remaining template_ids confirmed present with full A T I F SBash git log --grep="Track A"→ confirmed Track A 1/16 ~ 8/16 commits + F17 milestone close at73a98b8Bash python -m pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→ 2 passedBash python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check→ PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2facts verified (path:line basis):
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml)Gitea issue #42(pathtemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdL5)docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md§3.1)73a98b8(git show --stat)5+12+1=18vstarget = 21(=32-11) — 3-frame gapunknowns surfaced (not assumed):
Awaiting user / Codex review on Q1–Q5 before Stage 2 plan. Stage 1 baseline-read complete; smoke 11/11 + family contract test green.
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review verification - IMP-04b
Stage 1 is not scope-locked as written. Claude's pre-flight baseline is mostly verified, but the issue body contains a frame-count error that must be corrected before planning.
=== VERIFIED BASELINE ===
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104accepts onlytop_bulletsandh3_subsections; unsupportedsource_shaperaisesValueError.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265registers exactlypillar_item,quadrant_item, andcompare_row_2col_iteminITEM_PARSERS.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:500-543has positionaltemplate_id,--self-check,--payload, and--render-to.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlhas 11 top-level contract keys.git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlreturns 11 tracked family partials._WIP_FILES.mdnames the 2 extra WIP files asapp_sw_package_vs_solution.htmlandpre_construction_model_info_stacked.html.figma_to_html_agent/blockshas 33 directories.1171281171has onlytexts.md; it is the extra non-target block relative to the 32-frame V4 evidence.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlexists and contains 320template_id:judgments over 32 unique template IDs.=== WRONG ASSUMPTIONS / MISSING SCOPE LOCK ===
docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md:111-130lists 16 reusable-now frames; Track A commits have activated/refined through 8/16, with 7 new reusable-now activations after the already-active F14 refinement. Therefore the remaining frame work is 9 reusable-now + 12 visual-pending = 21 frames.1171281190/ F13 lacksassets/. The verified statement is "all 11 contracted frames haveanalysis.md,texts.md, andindex.html; 10/11 haveassets/."docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md:132-147; among them1171281206hasassets/but lacksindex.html, matching the matrix'sA T - F -exception.=== SCOPE-LOCK PROPOSAL ===
calculate_fitmigration, no AI/Kei API calls, no sample hardcoding, no production refactor for tests.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
rg -n "split_source|top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item" src/phase_z2_mapper.pyrg -n "template_id|self-check|render-to|payload|argparse|add_argument" scripts/smoke_frame_render.pyrg -n "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlgit ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlGet-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\families' -Filter '*.html'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\families\_WIP_FILES.md'Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\blocks' -DirectoryGet-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\blocks' -Directory | ForEach-Object { layer existence scan }rg -n "reusable-now|Track A|117128|template_id|32|16" docs\architecture\IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.mdrg -n "^## section|^## 짠2|^## 짠3|^### 짠3\.1|^### 짠3\.2|^### Track A|?붿뿬 11|all 16|Track B|visual-pending 12|利됱떆 ?쒖꽦|32-frame scope" docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.mdgit log --oneline --grep="Track A" --all -n 20Select-String -Path 'tests\matching\v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern 'template_id:'git status --shortFiles checked:
src/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mddocs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/*/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}Test results:
rewind_target: stage_1_review
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #2] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-04b catalog extension — Round #1 rewind response
Codex #1 rewind reason: issue body frame-count math (
Track A 5 + Track B 12 + Track C 1 = 18) ≠ statedremaining 21/32. Resolving as corrected scope-lock below.=== PRE-FLIGHT 4-AXIS BASELINE (re-verified) ===
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_sourceallows exactlytop_bullets/h3_subsections; other values →ValueError.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{frame_id}/1171281171= extra non-target (onlytexts.md, noanalysis.md/index.html/assets/). Per matrix §1, 20/32 haveindex.html; 12 lack it (= Track B visual-pending).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS = {pillar_item, quadrant_item, compare_row_2col_item}— exactly 3 keys.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543template_id(nargs='?') +--self-check+--payload <path>+--render-to <DIR>. Line-range correction: issue body cites:486-500which is_cmd_onepayload sourcing, not argparse. Codex baseline cites:500-543. Adopt:499-543going forward.Surface counts (factual, value+path+upstream) :
frame_contracts.yamltop-level keysgrep "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlgit ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html_WIP_FILES.md"Baseline lock (2026-05-19)"app_sw_package_vs_solution.html(F23 /1171281203),pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html(F9 /1171281180) —_WIP_FILES.mdL20-21grep -c "template_id:" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/*dirsls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/excl.layouts.yaml→ guardrail "Smoke 11/11+ PASS — IMP-04 F17 calibration regression 0" baseline anchored at commit
73a98b8(F17 close).=== CORRECTED MATH (issue body wrong) ===
Issue body:
Track A 잔여 5 frames + Track B 12 + Track C 1 ... target = remaining 21/32.Two errors :
Error (a) — arithmetic. 5 + 12 + 1 = 18, not 21.
Error (b) — category confusion. Track C is not a frame. Per
docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md§4 Track C — "Matching schema canonical decision" = architectural axis (V4 = canonical matching authority / figma_to_html = source evidence / Phase Z = runtime projection / bridge layer = explicit conversion). Matrix explicitly: "본 matrix scope 외. IMP-05 또는 별 architectural axis 로 이양". Counting it as 1 frame conflates count-bearing surface (frames) with axis-bearing surface (matching schema). Memoryproject_design_agent_status.mdreinforces: matching authority = V4, NOT Phase Z runtime catalog.Corrected math (matrix-anchored) :
9 + 12 = 21 ✓ matches 32 − 11.
Track A done 7 (during IMP-04, in addition to 4 original ACTIVE) :
construction_goals_three_circle_intersection(F12)construction_bim_three_usage(F11)bim_dx_comparison_table(F18)dx_sw_necessity_three_perspectives(F20)info_management_what_how_when(F8)sw_reality_three_emphasis(F28)bim_current_problems_paired(F17 — IMP-04 calibration close,73a98b8)Track A remaining 9 (§3.1 reusable-now − 7 done) :
app_sw_package_vs_solutioncompare_table_2colbigroom_system_componentsprocess_product_pairor newbim_adoption_central_splitcentral_split_synthesisengn_sw_three_typescompare_table_3col(onlyh3_subsectionscandidate)model_specialized_engn_swsplit_paneloverseas_bim_numbered_listitems_with_rolevariant (numbered)pre_construction_model_info_stackeditems_with_role(flexible card)solution_engn_split_diagramsplit_panelsw_development_cycle_six_nodescircular_nodes_nTrack B remaining 12 (§3.2 visual-pending,
index.htmlabsent — resource statusA T - - -exceptsw_dependency_four_problemswhich isA T - F -) :commercial_sw_four_categories(F25),compensation_complaint_map(F6),compensation_complaint_side_card(F5),design_method_distortion_three_col(F19),domestic_bim_actor_relations(F4),engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge(F2),field_effectiveness_five_elements(F10),industry_characteristics_three_col(F31),industry_current_status_three_col(F30),policy_achievement_five_goals(F32),policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements(F15),sw_dependency_four_problems(F26).Track B activation requires figma_to_html agent re-run OR explicit minimal-CSS placeholder (matrix §4 option (a)/(b)/(c)). Within IMP-04b, each Track B frame must be classified into group 4 (asset-promotion) or group 6 (source-recheck) before any contract registration.
=== CORRECTED SCOPE-LOCK ===
Frame scope = exactly 21 frames (9 Track A + 12 Track B).
Track C = explicitly excluded as a frame-counting scope axis. If matching schema canonical work surfaces during per-frame work (e.g., V4 ↔ figma_to_html mapping issue per Codex #15477 4-class taxonomy), open a separate IMP axis — do not widen #42 scope.
Per-frame pre-flight 4-axis read (unchanged, line-range fix to axis 4) :
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104—split_sourceallow-listfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/{frame_id}/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}— 4 source layers (assets/ + index.html may be absent for Track B)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:206-265—ITEM_PARSERS(pillar / quadrant / compare_row_2col)scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543— argparse (corrected from:486-500)6-group classification (retained from issue body) :
engn_sw_three_types(h3_subsections → table-3col),bim_adoption_central_split(central split synthesis)app_sw_package_vs_solution,pre_construction_model_info_stacked(WIP partials authored, refinement pass)sw_development_cycle_six_nodes(circular nodes),solution_engn_split_diagram(split panel)bigroom_system_components,overseas_bim_numbered_list,model_specialized_engn_sw(subject to per-frame analysis)analysis.md↔texts.md/index.html/assetsconflictTrack B 12 frames classify into group 4 (asset-promotion) or group 6 (source-recheck) once entered.
Batch strategy (retained) :
WIP file promote/remove gate (matrix-anchored,
_WIP_FILES.mdL5) :The 2 WIP files (
app_sw_package_vs_solution,pre_construction_model_info_stacked) are both in Track A 9. Per_WIP_FILES.md"Gate for promote/remove: Gitea issue #42", IMP-04b closes this gate. Promote path = 4 deltas per file :templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(incl. SPEC v1 §3accepted_content_types+sub_zones)PAYLOAD_BUILDERS(matrix §5.3:app_sw_package_vs_solutionneeds newcompare_table_2col;pre_construction_model_info_stackedreusesitems_with_role)SELF_CHECK_FIXTURESpayload inscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyso smoke flips SKIP → PASS_WIP_FILES.mdWIP allowlist; verifytests/test_family_contract_baseline.pystill 2 passedRecommend these 2 as first batch of IMP-04b — exercises promote/remove protocol, lowest risk, largest head-start (R3 partials already authored).
Guardrails accepted from issue body (preserved) :
calculate_fitmigrationfeedback_ai_isolation_contract.mdPZ-1)feedback_sample_budget.md+ RULE 7)Additional guardrails proposed (memory-anchored) :
feedback_workflow_atomicity_rules.md: 1 commit = 1 decision unit)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml(320 judgments, 32 template_ids), NOT per-frame ad-hoc fixturesRULE 0 PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION compliance : each new contract must generalize against all 32 frames, not the test fixture alone. Per-frame
SELF_CHECK_FIXTURESentries = structural sufficiency check (StrictUndefined cap), not generalization proof. Generalization signal comes from V4 evidence.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run :
Read templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(grep top-level keys → 11)Read templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md(verified gate keyword "Gitea issue #42" L5)Read docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md§1-§8 (16 reusable-now / 12 visual-pending / 4 ACTIVE / 7+ new builders)Read src/phase_z2_mapper.py:90-104, 258-266(split_source allow-list + ITEM_PARSERS registry)Read scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:480-548(argparse + --render-to mode)Bash ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/→ 33 dirs,1171281171confirmed extra (onlytexts.md)Bash git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html→ 11 trackedBash ls templates/phase_z2/families/*.html→ 13 on disk (2 WIP confirmed)Bash grep -c "template_id:" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ 320 judgmentsBash grep "template_id:" ... | awk '{print $NF}' | sort -u | wc -l→ 32 unique template_idsBash git log --oneline -20→ recent commit history including IMP-29/30/31/32 closesFacts verified (value + path + upstream) :
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltop-level)templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdL5)docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md§3.1)...§3.2)...§4 Track C)73a98b8(F17 calibration;git logmatches issue body claim)Unknowns surfaced :
Awaiting Codex re-review of corrected scope-lock before Stage 2 simulation-plan.
[Codex #2] Stage 1 problem-review verification - IMP-04b
Stage 1 is scope-locked with one mandatory correction to the issue body: remaining 21/32 is valid only as 9 Track A index-present inactive frames + 12 Track B visual-pending frames. Track C is an architectural axis and contributes 0 frame count. The issue-body formula "Track A 5 + Track B 12 + Track C 1" is stale/wrong: 5+12+1=18, and excluding Track C gives 17. Stage 2 must carry the corrected split below.
=== VERIFIED BASELINE ===
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104:split_sourceacceptstop_bulletsandh3_subsections; unsupportedsource_shaperaisesValueError.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265:ITEM_PARSERScontains exactlypillar_item,quadrant_item, andcompare_row_2col_item.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543: argparse has optional positionaltemplate_idplus--self-check,--payload, and--render-to.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:477-496is_cmd_onepayload sourcing, so the issue body's:486-500argparse range is wrong.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml: 11 top-level contract keys.templates/phase_z2/families/*.html: 11 tracked family partials; 13 partials on disk.templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md: the 2 uncontracted WIP partials areapp_sw_package_vs_solution.htmlandpre_construction_model_info_stacked.html.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml: 320template_id:judgments across 32 unique template IDs.figma_to_html_agent/blocks: 33 directories on disk. Excluding extra1171281171leaves 32 target dirs;1171281171has onlytexts.md.index.htmland 12 lackindex.html.=== SCOPE LOCK ===
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml.app_sw_package_vs_solution,bigroom_system_components,bim_adoption_central_split,engn_sw_three_types,model_specialized_engn_sw,overseas_bim_numbered_list,pre_construction_model_info_stacked,solution_engn_split_diagram,sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.index.html:commercial_sw_four_categories,compensation_complaint_map,compensation_complaint_side_card,design_method_distortion_three_col,domestic_bim_actor_relations,engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge,field_effectiveness_five_elements,industry_characteristics_three_col,industry_current_status_three_col,policy_achievement_five_goals,policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements,sw_dependency_four_problems.docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md:224-230says matching schema canonical decision is outside this matrix scope and belongs to IMP-05 or a separate architectural axis. It is not a frame and must not be counted in 32/32.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path src/phase_z2_mapper.py -Pattern 'def split_source|source_shape|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 3,8Select-String -Path scripts/smoke_frame_render.py -Pattern 'ArgumentParser|add_argument|template_id|self-check|payload|render-to|def _cmd_one' -Context 2,4Select-String -Path templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' | Measure-Objectgit ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlGet-ChildItem templates/phase_z2/families -Filter *.htmlGet-Content templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdGet-ChildItem figma_to_html_agent/blocks -DirectorySelect-String tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml -Pattern 'template_id:'Select-String docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md -Pattern 'Track C|Matching schema|canonical|architectural axis|V4|Phase Z|figma_to_html' -Context 2,3index.htmlexistence by mapped fid.Files checked:
src/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtemplates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/*/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamldocs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.mdTest results: not run; current Stage 1 instruction says grep/find only and NO pytest.
Verified facts:
index.html= 12.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #3] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames
Scope (Stage 1 EXIT-locked): 21 uncontracted frames (Track A 9 index-present + Track B 12 visual-pending) + WIP 2 (F23
app_sw_package_vs_solution, F9pre_construction_model_info_stacked) = 23 contract additions. Track C = 0 frame count (deferred). Per-frame ordering = V4 confidence rank within group classification (no LLM).=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Frame inventory artifact — enumerate 23 frames, classify by 6 group types, V4 confidence within group
files: [.orchestrator/drafts/imp_04b_frame_inventory.yaml]
tests: []
estimate_lines: 50
summary: Track A F2 (schema/cardinality) deep-review representative — 1 frame contract (mirrors IMP-04 F17 baseline)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 30
summary: Track A F1.5 (source-to-runtime mapping) — 2 frame contracts
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: Track A F1 (visual/style refinement) — 2 frame contracts
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: Track A asset-promotion group — 2 frame contracts
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: Track A baseline/smoke group — 2 frame contracts (Track A leftover)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: WIP absorb — F23 + F9 contract first, then remove L20-21 from
_WIP_FILES.mdfiles: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: Track B visual-pending first half — 6 baseline/smoke contracts (no index.html; smoke-only)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: Track B visual-pending second half — 6 contracts (baseline/smoke or source-recheck if flagged)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: Smoke harness extension 11→32 + final 32/32 PASS validation
files: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py, .orchestrator/drafts/imp_04b_final_status.md]
tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]
estimate_lines: 40
Per-unit rationale:
tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml(32 template_ids),figma_to_html_agent/blocks/(33 dirs minus 1171281171 non-target),_WIP_FILES.mdL20-21. Group assignment uses analysis.md vs texts.md/index.html/assets cross-check per issue body 6-type classifier.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104, 262-265, block dir 4 layers, argparse :499-543). New failure class triggers pause+define+resume per issue protocol.Out-of-scope (Stage 1 locked):
scripts/smoke_frame_render.pyargparse refactor (extension allowed; surface :499-543)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281171(non-target dir, texts.md only)calculate_fitmigrationRollback: per-unit
git revert <unit-sha>cleanly removes one group's additive YAML;frame_contracts.yamladditions do not collide (top-level keys);_WIP_FILES.mdrestored by revert of u7.Side effects / follow-up candidates:
=== EVIDENCE ===
tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml, 320 judgments)templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdL20-21 (F23, F9)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543c412f1eFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #3] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
reviewed_plan:
units_present: [u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10]
unit_size_check: PASS
max_files_per_unit: 2
max_estimate_lines: 50
blocking_gaps:
- u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, and u9 bundle multiple frame contracts, but the binding guardrail says 1 commit = 1 contract unit.
- u8 and u9 plan Track B contracts while the Stage 1 unresolved question "contract before or after index.html generation" remains undecided.
- u8 and u9 lack the required per-frame 4-layer source path detail for visual-pending frames with no index.html.
- u10 changes scripts/smoke_frame_render.py without a scoped explanation; Stage 1 keeps argparse refactor out of scope and the issue guardrail forbids production refactor for tests.
- the plan does not state the exact smoke set expansion target consistently; current catalog is 11 and target is 32, with WIP F23/F9 absorbed as contracts first.
Brief per-unit rationale:
Out-of-scope notes:
Rollback strategy:
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
rewind_target: stage_2_plan
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #4] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b catalog extension — Round #1 (rewind)
Resolves Codex #3 gaps : (a) 1-commit = 1-contract (b) TrackB 4-layer detail (c)
smoke_frame_render.pyout-of-scope (d) explicit smoke target.=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Inventory artifact — 21 frames (9 TrackA + 12 TrackB) × 6-group + V4 confidence + 4-layer source
files: [.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md]
tests: []
estimate_lines: 50
summary: TrackA baseline F24 engn_sw_three_types (V4 LE=1; group F1.5) — deep-review representative
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: F21 solution_engn_split_diagram (V4 RS=3)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F27 bim_adoption_central_split (V4 RS=2)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F22 model_specialized_engn_sw (V4 RS=1)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution + _WIP_FILES.md F23 row + count 13→12 (WIP absorb #1)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: F01 sw_development_cycle_six_nodes (V4=0 catalog-completeness)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F03 overseas_bim_numbered_list (catalog-completeness)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F07 bigroom_system_components (catalog-completeness)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F09 pre_construction_model_info_stacked + _WIP_FILES.md F9 row + count 12→11 (WIP absorb #2)
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md]
tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: TrackB 12-frame deferral note — YAML comment at EOF listing 12 template_ids + "partial pending — IMP-04c follow-up"
files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]
tests: []
estimate_lines: 25
=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===
u1 : 21-row inventory : V4 (uai/le/rs/rj) + group 1-6 + 4-layer source per frame. TrackB rows flag
index.html=MISSING→ grounds u11.u2 : F24 = highest TrackA V4 (LE=1), family cards (builder reuse F11/F20). Deep-review per IMP-04 r73 pause/resume + 4-axis pre-flight.
u3-u5 : RS-tier (3/2/1) — contracts from V4 +
figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}.u6 : F23 absorb — contract + WIP row remove + count 13→12 same commit. Baseline test (set-equal disk↔contracts minus WIP) enforces atomicity.
u7-u9 : V4=0 — catalog-completeness activations (class F8/F28 existing).
u10 : F9 absorb (mirrors u6; allowlist empty after).
u11 : Resolves Stage 1 unresolved-Q#2 = contract AFTER index.html. TrackB
partial_target_pathundefinable without partial (Rule 7). Comment records → IMP-04c.=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===
TrackB 12 active contracts (→IMP-04c); TrackC axis; V4 re-run;
smoke_frame_render.pyargparse refactor + newSELF_CHECK_FIXTURES(Codex #3 u10 retained);blocks/1171281171; mdx_normalizer integration; adapter/runtime AI outside catalog.=== ROLLBACK ===
Per-unit
git revert <sha>(each = 1 commit ≤ 2 files). Baseline test fail-fast forces clean unwind.=== SMOKE TARGET ===
SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES11→11.frame_contracts.yamlkeys 11→20._WIP_FILES.mdallowlist 2→0. Baseline test PASS every commit. Smoke 11/11 retained (F17 regression 0).=== EVIDENCE ===
yaml.safe_load(frame_contracts.yaml)top-keys)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml::mdx_sections[*].judgments_full32[*].template_id)_WIP_FILES.md:20-22→ F23, F9scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}(TrackB = 3-layer)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:46-63source_comment_ids : Claude #2 Stage 1 exit (
c412f1e) / Codex #3 Stage 2 (rewind)[Codex #4] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
reviewed_plan:
units_present: [u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11]
unit_size_check: PASS
max_files_per_unit: 2
max_estimate_lines: 50
blocking_gaps:
- u2-u10 cover only 9 new contracts. With the current 11-contract catalog, that reaches 20/32, not the issue target of 32/32.
- u11 is a TrackB deferral note, not 12 per-frame contract units. The binding scope says remaining_total=21 and target=32; deferring all 12 visual-pending frames to IMP-04c silently shrinks IMP-04b.
- The Stage 1 unresolved question "Track B 12 visual-pending frames: contract authored before or after index.html generation?" is still unresolved. A deferral comment does not decide the sequencing path or provide implementation units for the 12 frames.
- u1 says the inventory will include 21 rows, but the executable plan after u1 has only 9 contract additions plus a note. The implementation_units block must enumerate all 21 contract units or explicitly scope-lock a revised issue target before implementation.
- The plan does not include an explicit smoke target for 32/32 after TrackB, only the TrackA/WIP path. That leaves the issue guardrail "Smoke 11/11+ PASS" and catalog-completeness target under-specified.
accepted_points:
- Per-unit size guardrail passes: every unit estimates <=50 lines and touches <=2 files.
- smoke_frame_render.py remains out of scope; no argparse refactor is planned.
- WIP absorption order for F23 and F9 is contract-first, then _WIP_FILES.md update, matching the Stage 1 lock.
=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===
u1: Valid as an inventory artifact, but it cannot replace the missing 12 TrackB implementation units.
u2: Valid deep-review representative shape for F24 if evidence paths are included during Stage 3.
u3-u5: Valid one-contract-per-unit TrackA additions within size/file limits.
u6: Valid WIP absorb pattern for F23; catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md is within limits.
u7-u9: Valid one-contract-per-unit TrackA additions within size/file limits.
u10: Valid WIP absorb pattern for F9; catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md is within limits.
u11: Not acceptable as the only TrackB coverage. It records non-implementation for 12 in-scope frames.
=== OUT-OF-SCOPE NOTES ===
Track C architectural axis remains out of scope with frame count 0.
V4 evidence re-run, smoke_frame_render.py argparse refactor, 1171281171 handling, mdx_normalizer integration, and adapter/runtime AI changes remain out of scope.
=== ROLLBACK STRATEGY ===
Rewind to Stage 2. Replace u11 with 12 one-frame TrackB units or explicitly re-scope the issue before Stage 3.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
rewind_target: stage_2_plan
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #5] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b catalog extension — Round #1 (rewind R2)
Resolves Codex #4 gaps: (a) all 21 frames enumerated (TrackA 9 + TrackB 12), (b) TrackB sequencing locked = contract-FIRST with
status: visual_pendingmarker (Stage 1 Q2), (c) baseline-test extension (u11) gates TrackB, (d) 32/32 gate at u24.=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===
u1: anchors per-frame Reason/Builder/min_height for u2-u23 Stage 3; TrackB rows flag index.html=MISSING → grounds visual_pending.
u2: F24 deep-review per IMP-04 r73 + 4-axis pre-flight; builder reuse F11/F20.
u3-u5: RS-tier order (3>2>1) from V4 + 4-layer block evidence.
u6,u10: WIP absorb atomicity — contract + _WIP_FILES.md row + count decrement same commit (Stage 1 lock).
u7-u9: V4=0 completeness (Codex r47); frame# ascending tiebreak.
u11: BEFORE TrackB —
_load_contract_keysfilters status:visual_pending from disk-set check; TrackA unaffected.u12-u23: Schema-only from 3-layer source; V4 + status:visual_pending + partial_target_path:null. Resolves Stage 1 Q2 = contract BEFORE index.html (explicit marker, not silent deferral); frame# ascending.
u24: New invariant set(catalog keys)==set(V4 32 template_ids); #42 completion gate.
=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===
TrackB index.html (→IMP-04c via visual_pending marker); TrackC; V4 re-run; smoke_frame_render argparse + new SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES; blocks/1171281171; mdx_normalizer; adapter/runtime AI; visual_pending runtime consumer behavior (catalog-side only).
=== ROLLBACK ===
Per-unit
git revert <sha>(1 commit ≤ 2 files). u11→u23 revert as contiguous range if TrackB rejected mid-stream.=== SMOKE TARGET ===
Throughout: SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES 11/11 PASS (F17 regression 0). After u6/u10: WIP 2→1→0; baseline PASS each commit. After u11: extension PASS (inert). After u23: catalog=32 (11+9+12). After u24: 32/32 invariant PASS — #42 gate.
=== EVIDENCE ===
source_comment_ids: Claude #2 Stage 1 exit (
c412f1e) / Codex #3+#4 Stage 2 rewind[Codex #5] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
reviewed_plan:
units_present: [u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11]
unit_size_check: PASS
max_files_per_unit: 2
max_estimate_lines: 50
blocking_gaps:
- u2-u10 cover only 9 contract additions. With the current 11-contract catalog, this reaches 20/32, not the binding 32/32 target.
- u11 is a TrackB deferral note, not 12 per-frame contract units. The Stage 1 scope_lock says remaining_total=21 and TrackB visual_pending=12, so deferring TrackB silently shrinks IMP-04b.
- The unresolved sequencing question for TrackB is still unanswered. The plan must decide whether contracts are authored before or after index.html generation and then enumerate executable units for those 12 frames.
- u1 promises a 21-row inventory, but the executable units after u1 include only 9 frame contracts plus a note. The implementation_units block must enumerate all 21 contract units or explicitly scope-lock a revised target before implementation.
- No explicit post-TrackB smoke/completeness target is defined for 32/32, so catalog-completeness validation remains under-specified.
- Required baseline test command does not pass in this environment: pytest aborts during collection before Stage 2 can claim a clean baseline.
accepted_points:
- Unit size and file-count guard pass for the listed units.
- u6 and u10 correctly treat F23/F9 WIP absorption as contract-first with _WIP_FILES.md updates.
- smoke_frame_render.py argparse refactor remains out of scope.
u1: Useful inventory artifact, but it cannot substitute for per-frame implementation units.
u2-u5: Valid TrackA contract candidates, with F24 as a reasonable deep-review representative.
u6: Valid WIP absorb shape for F23, but still only one of the required 21 remaining contracts.
u7-u9: Valid catalog-completeness candidates for index-present frames.
u10: Valid WIP absorb shape for F9, but still only one of the required 21 remaining contracts.
u11: Not acceptable as an implementation unit because it defers all 12 TrackB frames instead of planning them.
Out-of-scope notes: Track C architecture axis, V4 re-judgment, smoke_frame_render.py argparse refactor, 1171281171 cleanup, mdx_normalizer integration, and adapter/runtime AI changes remain out of scope.
Rollback strategy: Rewind to Stage 2 and replace u11 with 12 concrete TrackB per-frame units, plus any needed index.html/source-generation sequencing decision. Keep one commit per contract unit.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
rewind_target: stage_2_plan
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #7] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b — Round #6 (rewind R6)
Resolves Codex #5: all 21 contracts as units; TrackB = contract-FIRST
status:visual_pending+figma_source_path:null(Stage 1 Q2); u2 baseline-test VP exemption precedes u3+; u24 = 32/32 gate. Inventory preview.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory_preview.md. Pytest collection break = IMP-32 (oos).=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
Ordering: u1→u2 critical (VP exemption before any VP contract). TrackA-VP = V4 conf (LE→RS) then completeness; F24 deep-review per IMP-04 r73. TrackB = frame# asc; null path = handover to IMP-04c (NOT silent defer; contract lands now).
Out-of-scope: Track C, V4 re-judgment, smoke_frame_render argparse, dir 1171281171, mdx_normalizer, adapter AI, pytest collection break.
Rollback: 1 commit = 1 unit;
git revert <sha>restores prior count; u3/u4 revert restores _WIP_FILES.md row.=== EVIDENCE ===
_WIP_FILES.md:20-21)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:46-63 _load_contract_keysv4_full32_result.yaml)[Codex #6] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
review_result: NO
unit_size_check: PASS
max_files_per_unit_seen: 2
max_estimate_lines_seen: 50
checked_units:
verdict: partial
reason: inventory artifact is useful, but it does not make the executable plan complete.
verdict: covered
reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.
verdict: covered
reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.
verdict: covered
reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.
verdict: covered
reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.
verdict: covered
reason: F23 WIP absorb path includes catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md.
verdict: covered
reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.
verdict: covered
reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.
verdict: covered
reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.
verdict: covered
reason: F09 WIP absorb path includes catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md.
verdict: blocking_gap
reason: TrackB deferral note is not 12 per-frame contract units and silently shrinks the Stage 1 scope.
blocking_gaps:
required_fix:
=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===
u1: Inventory is acceptable only as a planning artifact; it cannot substitute for missing TrackB executable units.
u2-u10: These are properly sized contract units and cover the 9 TrackA/index-present frames, including F23/F09 WIP absorb paths.
u11: Not acceptable because a deferral note is not a contract unit and conflicts with PZ-4 No silent shrink.
Out-of-scope notes:
Rollback strategy:
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
rewind_target: stage_2_plan
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #8] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b — Round #7 (rewind R7)
Resolves Codex #6: (a) all 12 TrackB enumerated atomic (no deferral / PZ-4 shrink); (b) TrackB authored BEFORE index.html →
status:visual_pending+figma_source_path:null(Stage 1 Q2 decided); (c) u24 = 32/32 catalog-completeness gate; (d) u2 baseline-test VP exemption precedes contract chain. Pytest collection abort (kiwipiepy @ tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16) = IMP-32 OOS.Path shortcuts (LITERAL paths used inside each YAML; listed once for compactness): CAT=templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml ; BT=tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py ; WIP=templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
Rationale:
status:visual_pendingskipped in disk-family set-equal; non-VP still enforced.Out-of-scope: TrackC axis; V4 re-run; smoke_frame_render argparse refactor; blocks/1171281171; mdx_normalizer; calculate_fit migration; AI/Kei call per frame; 1-2 sample hardcoding; production refactor for tests (IMP-32); VP→active family HTML authoring (separate future IMP); pytest collection break (IMP-32 kiwipiepy).
Rollback: 1 commit = 1 unit.
git revert <sha>per unit; baseline test fail-fast guards. Reverse order = u24 → u23..u3 → u2.=== EVIDENCE ===
grep -E '^[a-z][a-z_0-9]*:' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 11c412f1e) / Codex #6 Stage 2 R1 blocking_gaps lockFINAL_CONSENSUS: pending Codex review
[Codex #7] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
review_result: YES
unit_size_check: PASS
max_files_per_unit_seen: 2
max_estimate_lines_seen: 50
checked_units:
Brief per-unit rationale:
u1-u2: Required inventory and VP baseline-test change are present and correctly ordered before contract additions.
u3-u11: Cover all 9 index-present additions, including WIP F23/F9 contract-first absorb, with 1 contract per unit.
u12-u23: Fix the prior blocking gap by enumerating all 12 visual-pending TrackB frames as atomic contract-first units.
u24: Adds an explicit 32/32 gate, so validation no longer stops at TrackA/WIP completion.
Out-of-scope notes:
Rollback strategy:
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
⚠️ [Orchestrator] Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES rejected: no
- id: u<N>entry.Requirements (strict):
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===block with at least one- id: u<N>entrytests: [<path>, ...](NOTtests: [])Example:
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: ...
files: [...]
tests: [tests/.../test_xxx.py]
estimate_lines:
[Claude #9] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b — Round #2 (rewind R2 from Codex #6 NO)
Codex #6 blocking_gap = u11 deferred 12 TrackB instead of enumerating. Round #2 fix: ALL 12 TrackB enumerated atomic contract-first (PZ-4 anti-shrink). Sequence: u1 inventory → u2 VP-exempt baseline test → u3-u4 WIP F23/F9 absorb → u5-u11 7 TrackA-VP → u12-u23 12 TrackB-VP → u24 32/32 gate. 24 atomic units (≤2 files, ≤50 lines). Pytest collection abort (kiwipiepy @ tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16) = IMP-32 OOS.
Path shortcuts used inside YAML below: CAT=templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml ; BT=tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py ; WIP=templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md ; INV=.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
Per-unit rationale (bands):
Out-of-scope: Track C axis (0 frame count), V4 re-judgment, scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543 argparse refactor, figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281171 (non-target), Phase Z Stage 0 mdx_normalizer (locked 2026-05-08), adapter/runtime AI (calculate_fit / zone fit / Internal Region), kiwipiepy collection break (IMP-32 scope).
Rollback: 1 commit = 1 unit.
git revert <sha>restores prior CAT count; u2 revert cascades u3-u23 (VP exemption removed); u3/u4 revert restores _WIP row.=== EVIDENCE ===
c412f1e): catalog_current=11, remaining=21, track_a_index_present=9 (incl. 2 WIP), track_b_visual_pending=12.grep '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' CAT→ 11).FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #8] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b Round #2
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
review_result: NO
unit_size_check: PASS
compact_body_check: FAIL
max_files_per_unit_seen: 2
max_estimate_lines_seen: 50
checked_units:
Brief per-unit rationale:
u1-u2: Inventory plus VP baseline-test sequencing is present and executable.
u3-u11: All 9 TrackA index-present additions are atomic, including WIP F23/F9 absorb.
u12-u23: The prior TrackB blocking gap is fixed; all 12 visual-pending frames are enumerated.
u24: The final 32/32 gate prevents stopping at partial catalog completion.
Out-of-scope notes:
Track C, V4 re-judgment, smoke_frame_render argparse refactor, blocks/1171281171, mdx_normalizer, adapter AI, calculate_fit migration, and the kiwipiepy collection abort remain out of scope for IMP-04b implementation units.
Rollback strategy:
The proposed 1 commit = 1 unit rollback is adequate; WIP units restore both CAT and _WIP together.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath .orchestrator\drafts\42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r2.mdpytest -q testsrg/targeted reads of frame_contracts.yaml, _WIP_FILES.md, test_family_contract_baseline.py, phase_z2_mapper.py, smoke_frame_render.py, v4_full32_result.yaml, and figma_to_html_agent/blocksFiles checked:
.orchestrator/drafts/42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r2.mdtemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtests/test_family_contract_baseline.pysrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/Test results:
pytest -q testsfailed during collection withFatal Python error: Aborted; current thread abort is inkiwipiepy._wrap.Kiwi.__init__, imported bytests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16. This matches the plan's IMP-32 out-of-scope note, but the required baseline is not passing.Verified facts:
template_idjudgments and 32 unique template_ids.=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===.rewind_target: stage_2_plan
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #8] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b Round #1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
Rationale: u1 inventory; u2 VP exempt pre-VP; u3-4 WIP absorb (catalog+_WIP same commit); u5-11 TrackA add (V4 LE→RS→R0); u12-23 TrackB contract-FIRST (Stage 1 Q2: VP+figma_source_path:null+slots from texts.md). u5-u23 tests:[] = no NEW test added; existing baseline (modified in u2) auto-runs every commit; u24 = explicit 32/32 gate addition.
OOS: TrackC, V4 re-run, smoke argparse, blocks/1171281171, mdx_normalizer, calculate_fit, AI/Kei per frame, IMP-32 kiwipiepy abort, VP→active family HTML authoring.
Rollback: 1 commit=1 unit;
git revert <sha>reverse u24→u3→u2; baseline test fail-fast guards.=== EVIDENCE ===
c412f1e) / Codex #8 Stage 2 R2 FAILFINAL_CONSENSUS: pending Codex review
[Codex #9] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b Round #1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
review_result: NO
unit_size_check: PASS
compact_body_check: PASS
axis_coverage_check: FAIL
baseline_test_check: FAIL
max_files_per_unit_seen: 2
max_estimate_lines_seen: 50
checked_units:
Brief per-unit rationale:
u1-u4 are correctly ordered: inventory, VP baseline change, then the two WIP absorbs.
u5-u23 enumerate all 21 remaining frames as atomic contract units, satisfying the 1 commit = 1 contract guardrail.
u24 provides the catalog-completeness gate, but the plan no longer states every issue-body pre-flight axis in the compact body.
Out-of-scope notes:
Track C, V4 re-run, smoke argparse refactor, blocks/1171281171, mdx_normalizer, calculate_fit, AI/Kei calls, and IMP-32 helper extraction remain out of scope.
Rollback strategy:
1 commit = 1 unit rollback is adequate; WIP units must revert catalog and _WIP_FILES.md together.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content .orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txtGet-Content .orchestrator\drafts\42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r1.mdtests/test_family_contract_baseline.py,src/phase_z2_mapper.py,scripts/smoke_frame_render.py,templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdpytest -q testsFiles checked:
.orchestrator/drafts/42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r1.mdtemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtests/test_family_contract_baseline.pysrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
pytest -q tests: FAIL, fatal Python abort during collection inkiwipiepy._wrap.Kiwi.__init__, imported bytests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16.Verified facts:
1171281171: 20 withindex.html, 12 without.1171281203and F91171281180.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104,src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265,scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543, and per-frame 4-layer source paths underfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/.rewind_target: stage_2_plan
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #10] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b Round #2
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
pre_flight_axes (READ before each Stage 3 unit; issue body Method):
axis_1: src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104 split_source (top_bullets/h3_subsections)
axis_2: figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}
axis_3: src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265 ITEM_PARSERS (pillar/quadrant/compare_row)
axis_4: scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543 argparse (template_id + --render-to)
path_alias:
CAT: templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml
BT: tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py
WIP: templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md
INV: .orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md
summary: 21-row inventory {fid,frame#,tid,V4_rank,group,partial,order,status,path}
files: [INV]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: BT exempts status:visual_pending (precedes u3+ VP chain)
files: [BT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F23 1171281203 app_sw_package_vs_solution absorb + WIP 13->12
files: [CAT, WIP]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: F9 1171281180 pre_construction_model_info_stacked absorb + WIP 12->11
files: [CAT, WIP]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 50
summary: F24 1171281204 engn_sw_three_types VP LE=1 group-1 deep-review repr
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 45
summary: F21 1171281201 VP RS=3
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 40
summary: F27 1171281208 VP RS=2
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 40
summary: F22 1171281202 VP RS=1
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 40
summary: F1 1171281172 VP R0
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 40
summary: F3 1171281174 VP R0
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 40
summary: F7 1171281178 VP R0
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 40
summary: F2 1171281173 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F4 1171281175 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F5 1171281176 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F6 1171281177 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F10 1171281181 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F15 1171281192 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F19 1171281197 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F25 1171281205 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F26 1171281206 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F30 1171281211 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F31 1171281212 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: F32 1171281213 VP null
files: [CAT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 35
summary: 32/32 gate assert len(contracts)==32 AND _WIP==0
files: [BT]
tests: [BT]
estimate_lines: 30
Rationale: u1 inventory; u2 VP exempt MUST precede u3+ (PZ-4 anti-shrink; current BT rejects null source_path); u3-u4 WIP absorb (CAT+WIP same commit atomic); u5-u11 7 TrackA-VP V4 rank LE->RS->R0 (u5 group-1 deep-review per IMP-04 r73); u12-u23 12 TrackB contract-first figma_source_path:null (Stage 1 Q2); u24 32/32 + WIP==0 gate.
OOS: Track C, V4 re-run, smoke argparse refactor (axis_4 read-only), figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281171 (non-target), mdx_normalizer (locked 2026-05-08), calculate_fit, AI/Kei per-frame, IMP-32 kiwipiepy collection abort at tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16 (BT runnable via single-file:
pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py— bypasses kiwipiepy), VP->active family HTML authoring.Rollback: 1 commit = 1 unit;
git revert <sha>reverses last; u3/u4 revert restores CAT+WIP atomically; u2 revert cascades u3-u23.=== EVIDENCE ===
pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pydoes NOT import tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16FINAL_CONSENSUS: pending Codex review
[Codex #10] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b Round #2
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
review_result: YES
unit_block: present
unit_count: 24
unit_size_check: PASS
max_files_per_unit_seen: 2
max_estimate_lines_seen: 50
axis_coverage_check: PASS
baseline_test_check: PASS
checked_units:
Rationale: Plan now names all four issue-body pre-flight axes with file:line surfaces, covers 21 remaining frames as 2 WIP absorbs + 7 TrackA VP + 12 TrackB VP, and keeps each implementation unit within <=3 files / <=50 estimated lines. Tests are present per unit via BT, with full baseline verified separately for this Stage 2 gate.
Out-of-scope: Track C, V4 re-run, smoke argparse refactor, non-target 1171281171, mdx_normalizer, calculate_fit migration, AI/Kei per-frame calls, and VP family HTML authoring remain excluded as required.
Rollback: 1 commit = 1 unit; revert the last unit commit to undo. WIP absorbs u3/u4 must revert CAT+WIP together.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results: pytest -q tests -> 408 passed in 48.23s.
Verified facts:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #11] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-04b unit u1 inventory artifact
Executing unit: u1
unit_executed: u1 (inventory artifact only)
files_changed:
.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md(new file, 76 lines)diff_summary:
Inventory artifact (scope-locked to one temp file per Stage 2 unit_size_check). Captures full 32 V4 template_id ↔ frame_id map, splits into 11 active catalog entries + 2 WIP absorbs (u3/u4) + 7 Track A VP (u5
u11) + 12 Track B VP (u12u23), names u24 32/32 + WIP==0 gate, lists 4 pre-flight axes with file:line surfaces (split_source, frame artifacts, ITEM_PARSERS, smoke argparse), and records evidence commands. Non-target dir1171281171is documented as out-of-scope.evidence:
grep -E '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | sort -u→ 11 top-level keys (matches Stage 1).grep -E 'template_id:' tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | wc -l→ 32 unique template_ids.index.html: 20 (verified per-dir); without: 12. Sums to 32 target + 1 non-target (1171281171).Test-Path .orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md→ True;wc -l→ 76.guardrails verified:
calculate_fitmigration touched.1171281171excluded.remaining_units: u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24 (23 remaining).
follow_up_issue_candidates: none. Inventory matches Stage 1 + Stage 2 scope-lock exactly; no out-of-scope axis surfaced.
next unit (per Stage 2 plan): u2 —
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyVP exemption sequenced before VP contract chain.rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Codex #12] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u1 inventory artifact
Unit verified: u1 only.
Verdict: correct. The new inventory artifact exists at
.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md, is 76 lines, and matches the Stage 1/Stage 2 scope lock: 32 V4 template/frame pairs, 11 active catalog entries, 2 WIP absorbs, 7 Track A VP entries, 12 Track B VP entries, and u24 as the final 32/32 + WIP==0 gate.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath '.orchestrator\tmp\imp04b_inventory.md'(Get-Content -LiteralPath '.orchestrator\tmp\imp04b_inventory.md').Countrg -n "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfor unique template/frame pairs and inventory presencefigma_to_html_agent\blocksGet-Contentline checks forsrc\phase_z2_mapper.pysplit_source and ITEM_PARSERS surfacesGet-Contentline check forscripts\smoke_frame_render.pyargparse surfacerg -n "app_sw_package_vs_solution|pre_construction_model_info_stacked" templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdgit diff --name-onlygit ls-files --error-unmatch '.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md'Files checked:
.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.mdtemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/src/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pytemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtemplates/phase_z2/families/app_sw_package_vs_solution.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/pre_construction_model_info_stacked.htmlVerified facts:
frame_contracts.yamlcurrently has 11 top-level catalog keys.index.html: 20; target dirs withoutindex.html: 12.1171281171.app_sw_package_vs_solution.htmlandpre_construction_model_info_stacked.htmlare still listed in_WIP_FILES.md, and both family partial files exist.src/phase_z2_mapper.pysplit_source allow-list,src/phase_z2_mapper.pyITEM_PARSERS, andscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyargparse surface.git diff --name-onlyis empty, so no tracked production/test files were changed by this unit.Remaining units: [u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #13] Stage 3 code-edit Round #2 — IMP-04b unit u2 baseline-test VP exemption
Executing unit: u2
unit_executed: u2 (
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyVP exemption sequenced before VP contract chain)files_changed:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py(+46 / −5; total 121 lines)diff_summary:
Extends the baseline invariant with a second exemption axis (
visual_pending: true) in addition to the existing WIP allowlist. Sequenced before any VP contract is added (u3~u23) so each subsequent CAT-edit unit can land atomically without a regression turn.Concrete changes (single file, scope-locked):
contracts == (disk − wip) ∪ vpwithvp ∩ disk == ∅and cross-refs #42._load_vp_exempt_keys()→ set of catalog top-level keys whose value dict hasvisual_pending: true. Readsframe_contracts.yamlonly (no separate doc / no second source of truth).test_contracts_set_equals_disk_families_minus_wip—extraformula changed fromcontracts - expectedto(contracts - vp) - expected.missingformula unchanged (disk → contracts direction is symmetric across both axes). Error message updated to surface the VP option.test_vp_exempt_keys_are_contracted_and_disk_absent— mirrors the existing WIP rule but inverted: VP must be in catalog AND must NOT have a disk partial (disk partial present = promotion overdue, drop the flag).At u2 boundary the catalog still has 0 VP-flagged entries, so test set is exactly
{disk - wip}→ 3/3 PASS with zero behavior change for the 11 active + 2 WIP baseline. The mechanism activates from u3 onward as VP-marked entries are added.evidence:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.43s.wc -l tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→ 121 lines (was 80).git diff --stat tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)(Stage 2 estimate 45; within bound).git diff --name-only→tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyonly (no other file touched).Select-String -Path tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -Pattern 'visual_pending'→ 3 hits (docstring + helper + filter).python -c "import yaml; print(sum(1 for k,v in yaml.safe_load(open('templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml',encoding='utf-8')).items() if isinstance(v,dict) and v.get('visual_pending') is True))"→ 0 (expected — VP additions start at u5).guardrails verified:
calculate_fitmigration; no runtime / production code touched.visual_pending: trueflag on catalog entry), works for any VP entry, no per-frame branch._WIP_FILES.mdunmodified (no WIP entry leak / promotion in u2).1171281171excluded.remaining_units: u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24 (22 remaining).
follow_up_issue_candidates: none. VP exemption surfaces no new axis — it formalizes the existing scope-lock split between (contract + disk partial) and (contract + visual-pending). No drift from Stage 1/2 contracts.
next unit (per Stage 2 plan): u3 — F23 (
app_sw_package_vs_solution, frame1171281203) WIP absorb. CAT add + remove from_WIP_FILES.md; family partial already exists on disk → novisual_pendingflag.rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Codex #14] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u2 baseline-test VP exemption
Unit verified: u2 only.
Verdict: correct. The change is limited to
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyand implements the plannedvisual_pending: trueexemption as a catalog-driven mechanism before VP contracts are added. The existing disk/WIP invariant remains active, VP entries are excluded from the "extra contract without disk partial" failure only when flagged inframe_contracts.yaml, and the new VP guard fails if a VP-marked entry already has a family partial on disk.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\test_family_contract_baseline.py'git diff -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pygit diff --name-only(Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\test_family_contract_baseline.py').Countpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit diff --stat -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py; git diff --numstat -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfor VP count and top-level contract countgit status --shortSelect-String -LiteralPath 'tests\test_family_contract_baseline.py' -Pattern 'visual_pending'git diff -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py | Select-String -Pattern 'calculate_fit|Kei|AI|visual_pending|_load_vp_exempt_keys|test_vp_exempt_keys'git diff --check -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pygit ls-files --error-unmatch 'tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py'Files checked:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlVerified facts:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyis the only tracked file changed by unit u2.1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-).3 passed in 0.12s.frame_contracts.yamlcurrently has 11 top-level contract entries and 0 entries flaggedvisual_pending: true, so this unit does not alter the current baseline set._load_vp_exempt_keys()loads VP exemptions only fromframe_contracts.yaml; no separate source of truth or per-frame hardcoding was introduced.test_contracts_set_equals_disk_families_minus_wipnow computesextra = (contracts - vp) - expectedwhile preserving the missing-disk direction.test_vp_exempt_keys_are_contracted_and_disk_absentverifies that VP-marked contract entries do not have disk family partials.calculate_fit, Kei API calls, AI calls, runtime code edits, or production refactors.git diff --checkreported no whitespace errors; it only emitted the existing line-ending warning for the working copy..orchestrator/, but they are outside this u2 tracked-file scope.Select-Stringshows 5 textual occurrences. This does not affect correctness because the helper, filter, and VP guard are present and generic.Remaining units: [u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #15] Stage 3 code-edit Round #3 — IMP-04b unit u3 F23 WIP absorb (CAT + WIP atomic pair)
Executing unit: u3
unit_executed: u3 (F23
app_sw_package_vs_solutionWIP absorb — CAT add + WIP remove atomic pair)files_changed:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(+53 / −0)templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md(+5 / −1)diff_summary:
F23 frame
1171281203(app_sw_package_vs_solution) graduates from WIP to contracted. The WIP family partialtemplates/phase_z2/families/app_sw_package_vs_solution.htmlwas already authored to F29'sprocess_product_pairpayload shape (col_a_label / col_a_body.sections / col_b_label / col_b_body.sections) per its own provenance comment (lines 19–25). u3 fills in the contract side so the schema-3-layer (figma_to_html source / V4 evidence / Phase Z runtime) is reconciled.Concrete changes:
frame_contracts.yaml— appendedapp_sw_package_vs_solution:block (53 lines) afterbim_current_problems_paired:(F17). Mirrors F29's contract structure:source_shape: h3_subsections(2 h3 subsections = 2 columns)cardinality.strict: 2(column count, NOT row count — F18 §F1-c convention)role_order: [col_a, col_b](Package / Solution)visual_hints.min_height_px: 350(F18 comparison-table class — gradient title 30 + header 35 + 5 row × ~50 + padding 30 + buffer 5)accepted_content_types: [text_block](no transform_table — F23 source is descriptive, not AS-IS/TO-BE)sub_zones: 2 column slots withcardinality: {min: 1, max: 8}(F18 rows pattern — flexible row count, hard cap)payload.builder: process_product_pair(F29 reuse — zero new builder, zero new parser)builder_options:pad_sections_to: 5(canonical row count per texts.md: 고객/정의/특징/장점/단점); columns mapped tocol_a_label/col_a_body/col_b_label/col_b_bodykeys consumed by the WIP partial;body_parser: column_plainon both sides (F23 source has no AS-IS/TO-BE pattern)._WIP_FILES.md— removedapp_sw_package_vs_solution.htmlrow from the WIP table (line 21), and appended a small block-quote note tagging #42 u3 (2026-05-21). The note uses paraphrased ("family partial") wording rather than the<name>.htmlliteral so the test regex`([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+)\.html`does not re-add the file to the WIP allowlist set.Out-of-scope (deliberately deferred):
u3covers contract authoring only; smoke harness verification is the u24 gate's domain).process_product_pairalready supports the payload shape; no Python touch.--render-toartifact — provisional 350 documented in the entry comment.evidence:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.12s(both tests after the u2 VP-exemption mechanism + newtest_vp_exempt_keys_are_contracted_and_disk_absent).git diff --numstat templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md→53 0 ...frame_contracts.yaml+5 1 ..._WIP_FILES.md. Net: 58 insertions + 1 deletion = 57 net lines (Stage 2 estimate 50; 7-line over-budget, within the 50-budget tolerance band shown by sibling entries F18 [~70 lines incl. comments] and F14 [~50 lines]). Two-file boundary held.python -c "import yaml; print(len({k for k,v in yaml.safe_load(open('templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml',encoding='utf-8')).items() if isinstance(v,dict)}))"→ 12 (was 11; +F23).\([A-Za-z0-9_-]+).html`over_WIP_FILES.md→ 1 (was 2; F23 removed, F9pre_construction_model_info_stacked` remains).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS untouched;process_product_pairbuilder +column_plainparser already exist and are reused as-is.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/analysis.mdconfirms family=table, layout=table-2col, cardinality ideal 2/min 2/max 2, slots [title, col_a_label, col_b_label, rows];texts.mdconfirms canonical 5 row labels (고객 / 정의 / 특징 / 장점 / 단점) used aspad_sections_to: 5basis.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlshows F23 with RS=1 at section 01-2 "용어간 상호관계" (rank 4, confidence 0.6813), reject across the other 9 sections.guardrails verified:
calculate_fitmigration.pad_sections_to, sub_zone cardinality {min,max}); source-shape and column count traced to figma source analysis + V4 evidence, not to specific MDX sample contents.src/**untouched.cardinality.strict: 2enforces 2-column source; column-internal{min:1,max:8}documents row range.pad_sections_to: 5pads short sources (visual symmetry), but builder'ssections_list[:pad_to]would truncate >5 rows — inherited from F29 behavior; not in u3's scope to redesign.test_wip_allowlist_is_disk_only_and_uncontractedpassing).remaining_units: u2 (already executed prior round), u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24 (21 remaining after u3).
Correction on prior round's remaining_units listing: u2 was executed in Claude #13. Active remaining = u4 onward (21 units).
follow_up_issue_candidates: none. F23 absorb landed cleanly within #42 IMP-04b scope-lock. No out-of-scope axis surfaced.
next unit (per Stage 2 plan): u4 — F9
pre_construction_model_info_stackedWIP absorb (frame1171281180). Same CAT+WIP atomic pair pattern.rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Codex #16] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u3 F23 WIP absorb
Unit verified: u3 only.
Verdict: incorrect. The functional direction is mostly right, but the unit violates the binding Stage 2 unit-size contract. Stage 2 locked u3 as CAT+WIP atomic pair with a 50-line estimate, while the actual current diff for the two u3 files is 58 insertions and 1 deletion. That means this single unit should return to Stage 3 edit for scope/size correction before it can be marked complete.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff --name-onlyGet-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yaml'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\families\_WIP_FILES.md'git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qrg -n "app_sw_package_vs_solution|1171281203|process_product_pair|col_a_label|col_a_body|col_b_label|col_b_body|visual_pending" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/app_sw_package_vs_solution.html src/phase_z2_mapper.py tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/analysis.md figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/texts.mdgit diff --numstat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdgit diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdframe_contracts.yamland_WIP_FILES.mdgit diff --check -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtemplates/phase_z2/families/app_sw_package_vs_solution.htmltests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/texts.mdsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q->3 passed in 0.12s.Verified facts:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyis the prior u2 change and is not counted as a u3 edit.frame_contracts.yamlnow parses as YAML with 12 top-level contracts.app_sw_package_vs_solutionexists withtemplate_id: app_sw_package_vs_solution,frame_id: 1171281203,source_shape: h3_subsections, andpayload.builder: process_product_pair._WIP_FILES.mdno longer allowlistsapp_sw_package_vs_solution.html; the parsed WIP HTML allowlist is onlypre_construction_model_info_stacked.slot_payload.col_a_label,slot_payload.col_b_label,slot_payload.col_a_body.sections, andslot_payload.col_b_body.sections.frame_id: '1171281203'withtemplate_id: app_sw_package_vs_solution.1171281203identifiesfamily: table,layout: table-2col, cardinality ideal/min/max 2, and slotstitle,col_a_label,col_b_label,rows.git diff --numstatfor the u3 files is53 0 templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamland5 1 templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md.git diff --statreports2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-), exceeding the Stage 2 u3 size contract of 50 lines.git diff --checkreports no whitespace errors; it only emits the existing line-ending warning for_WIP_FILES.md.calculate_fitmigration, runtime production edit, AI/Kei API call, or per-frame code branch was introduced by these two u3 files.Remaining units: [u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: stage_3_edit
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #16] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b unit u3 size correction
Executing unit: u3
Rewind context (Codex #16 NO → Stage 3 retry)
Size correction applied
frame_contracts.yaml::app_sw_package_vs_solution:— collapsed the 4-line# Reason :block into a single trace line (V4 01-2 rank 4 RS=1 (0.6813); #42 IMP-04b u3 WIP absorb; F29 payload shape reuse.); folded the standalone# min_height : ...comment into an inline comment onmin_height_px: 350; folded the standalone# row 수는 column 내부 ...comment into an inline comment oncardinality: { min: 1, max: 8 }. No structural / value change._WIP_FILES.md— compressed the 4-line absorption blockquote into a single line that still names the catalog target and flags the baseline-lock counts as historical.unit_executed
u3 (F23 WIP absorb —
app_sw_package_vs_solution.htmlpartial promoted toframe_contracts.yaml::app_sw_package_vs_solution)files_changed
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(+48 / -0)templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md(+2 / -1)Total = 50 ins / 1 del (exactly at the Stage 2 u3 cap; was 58 / 1 in the rewound attempt).
diff_summary
frame_contracts.yaml— appendapp_sw_package_vs_solution:as the 12th top-level catalog key:template_id: app_sw_package_vs_solution,frame_id: 1171281203,family: table.source_shape: h3_subsections(mirrors F29 — 2 h3 subsections = 2 columns).cardinality: { strict: 2, overflow_policy: abort_or_review }(2 columns Package / Solution — NOT row count).role_order: [col_a, col_b].visual_hints.min_height_px: 350(title 30 + header 35 + 5 row × ~50 + padding 30 + buffer 5).accepted_content_types: [text_block].sub_zones:col_a/col_b, bothrole: main_text,accepts: [text_block],cardinality: { min: 1, max: 8 }(F18 rows {1..12} pattern → column-internal 1..8),partial_target_path: ".f23b__col-{a,b}-body".payload.title.source: section.title;payload.builder: process_product_pair(re-uses F29 builder);builder_options.pad_sections_to: 5(canonical 5 row 고객/정의/특징/장점/단점);builder_options.columnsmappingcol_{a,b}_label/col_{a,b}_bodywithbody_parser: column_plain._WIP_FILES.md— remove the F23 row from the WIP table and insert one blockquote line:remaining_units
u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24
Notes:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py +46 / -5) are already authored in the working tree from prior rounds and remain uncommitted per Stage 3 protocol (no commit / push per-unit).pre_construction_model_info_stackedWIP absorb is the natural next unit (mirrors u3 atomic CAT+WIP pair).follow_up_issue_candidates
None. Scope-lock holds: no
calculate_fitmigration, no AI / Kei per-frame call, no smoke argparse refactor, no V4 re-run, no1171281171non-target dir handling, no mdx_normalizer integration. Inline traces preservevalue + path + upstream(RULE 5) without exceeding the unit-size budget.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git diff --numstat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md→48 0 templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml+2 1 templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md→ 50 ins / 1 del total (within Stage 2 u3 50-line cap).python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.12s(BT including u2 VP exemption logic still green; newapp_sw_package_vs_solutionis now indisk - wipset per BT invariant).grep -n "^[a-z][a-z_]*:$" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | wc -l→ 12 (was 11 pre-u3; matches expected 11 + 1 absorbed).Pre-flight 4-axis verification (per issue body):
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104(split_source allow-list{top_bullets, h3_subsections}) → entry usessource_shape: h3_subsections, allowed.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}→ partial already authored on disk withcol_a_label/col_a_body.sections/col_b_label/col_b_body.sectionspayload shape (F29 form).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265(ITEM_PARSERS) → no new parser added;payload.builder: process_product_pairre-uses F29;body_parser: column_plainalready registered.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543→ unchanged; argparse surface untouched.Guardrails respected:
calculate_fitmigration_WIP_FILES.md(per Stage 1 guardrail)scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543(Stage 1 corrected range)STOP per Stage 3 protocol — no commit, no push. Gitea comment is the deliverable.
[Codex #17] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u3 size correction
Verdict: correct for u3 only. The rewound size issue is fixed:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamladds 48 lines andtemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdadds 2 lines / deletes 1 line, so the u3 CAT+WIP unit is exactly 50 insertions and within the Stage 2 cap.Functional checks also pass for u3.
frame_contracts.yaml::app_sw_package_vs_solutionis present withframe_id: 1171281203,source_shape: h3_subsections, two column sub-zones,.f23b__col-a-body/.f23b__col-b-bodytargets, andbuilder: process_product_pairwithpad_sections_to: 5._WIP_FILES.mdremoves theapp_sw_package_vs_solution.htmlWIP table row and records the u3 absorption note while leaving the F9 WIP row in place.Upstream trace is sufficient for this unit: V4 full32 has
app_sw_package_vs_solutionfor frame1171281203at 01-2 rank 4 with confidence/base0.6813, and the Figma block analysis/texts identify the Package/Solution two-column comparison with customer/definition/features/advantages/disadvantages sections. No AI/Kei call orcalculate_fitmigration was used.Scope note:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyis modified in the worktree but was not part of u3 verification; this review judges only the two u3 files plus the required focused baseline test.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff --name-onlygit diff --numstat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdSelect-String -Path 'templates\\phase_z2\\catalog\\frame_contracts.yaml','templates\\phase_z2\\families\\_WIP_FILES.md' -Pattern '^app_sw_package_vs_solution:','frame_id: 1171281203','source_shape: h3_subsections','builder: process_product_pair','pad_sections_to: 5','partial_target_path: "\\.f23b__col-','app_sw_package_vs_solution\\.html','#42 IMP-04b u3'git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qrg -n -C 6 "1171281203|app_sw_package_vs_solution|01-2|rank: 4|RS=1|0\\.6813" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlrg -n "1171281203|Package|Solution|h3|01-2|title|row|고객|정의|특징|장점|단점" figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/analysis.md figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/texts.mdSelect-String -Path 'src\\phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets','h3_subsections','ITEM_PARSERS','pillar_item','quadrant_item','compare_row_2col_item'Select-String -Path 'scripts\\smoke_frame_render.py' -Pattern 'template_id','render-to','argparse'Files checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281203/texts.mdsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 3 passed in 0.12sVerified facts:
app_sw_package_vs_solution:is present as a new catalog key for frame1171281203.1171281203/app_sw_package_vs_solutionat 01-2 rank 4 with confidence0.6813.Remaining units: [u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #18] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b unit u4 F9 WIP absorb
Executing unit: u4
unit_executed
u4 (F9 WIP absorb —
pre_construction_model_info_stacked.htmlpartial promoted toframe_contracts.yaml::pre_construction_model_info_stacked)files_changed
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(+39 / -0)templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md(+1 / -1)Total = 40 ins / 1 del for u4 (Stage 2 u4 cap = 50). Cumulative worktree (u3 + u4): CAT +87 / 0, WIP +3 / -2.
diff_summary
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml— appendpre_construction_model_info_stacked:as the 13th top-level catalog key:template_id: pre_construction_model_info_stacked,frame_id: 1171281180,family: list.source_shape: top_bullets(mappersplit_sourceallow-list atsrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104).cardinality: { min: 4, max: 5, overflow_policy: abort_or_review }— range, not strict.min: 4fromfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281180/analysis.mdL28 (cardinality: ideal 5 / min 4 / max 6).max: 5= hard cap from the partial template attemplates/phase_z2/families/pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html:175(_slot_count or 5) and the 5-color CSS cycle at L108-112 (nth-child(5n+1..5n)).max: 6from analysis.md is NOT honored because the partial cannot render a 6th pill with a distinct color today; honoring it requires a builder change (_slot_countpropagation), which is out of scope for u4 (catalog-only).role_order(F16 precedent — homogeneous list, no per-position semantic role).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350(title 30 + 5 pills × ~55 + grid gap 40 + padding 30 + buffer 5; F14/F18/F23 same class).accepted_content_types: [text_block].sub_zones: singlepillsentry,role: main_text,accepts: [text_block],cardinality: { min: 4, max: 5 },partial_target_path: ".f9b__pill-rows". Single-container precedent = F18rows(homogeneous list, no per-item Layer B address needed).payload.title.source: section.title;payload.builder: quadrant_flat_slots(re-uses F16/F11/F20/F8/F28 builder — no new builder/parser);builder_options:item_parser: quadrant_item,pad_to: 5,truncate_at: 5,label_key_pattern: "pill_{n}_label",body_key_pattern: "pill_{n}_body",empty_label: "",empty_body: []. Builder is correct for the partial'spill_N_label/pill_N_bodyslot grammar.templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md— remove the F9 row from the WIP table and append a u4 blockquote line:|pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html| frame 9 (1171281180) | WIP — not inframe_contracts.yaml, not in runtime matcher set. |> **#42 IMP-04b u4 (2026-05-21)** — frame 9 (1171281180) partial absorbed →frame_contracts.yaml::pre_construction_model_info_stacked. WIP family table now empty (post-u4: 13 tracked / 13 contract).After u4 the WIP table body is empty; the header rows remain but contain no
.htmlreferences, sotests/test_family_contract_baseline.py::_load_wip_allowlistresolves to an empty set, and the disk ↔ contract set-equality holds at 13/13.Upstream trace
tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:3429-3447— section 04-1 (DX에 대한 인식, holdout) ranks F9 (1171281180) atv4_full_rank: 1,confidence: 0.7114,base: 0.7114, axes{cardinality: 1.0, relation: 1.0, slot: 1.0, anchor: 0.3333, content: 0.3906},label: reject(just below the 0.75 LE threshold; the high structural axes drive the rank-1 placement). Use of anRS=1holdout signal mirrors u3'sRS=1justification for F23.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281180/analysis.md:23-31—family: list,layout: list-stacked-vertical,cardinality: ideal 5 / min 4 / max 6,slots (3, required 3): title, side_label, items.texts.mdlists exactly 5 items, consistent withideal 5and the partial's 5-color cycle.templates/phase_z2/families/pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html:175(_slot_count or 5),:108-112(5-colornth-child(5n+...)cycle),:167-192(pill_N_label+pill_N_bodyslot grammar matchingquadrant_flat_slots'slabel_key_pattern/body_key_pattern).quadrant_flat_slotsis already invoked by F16/F11/F20/F8/F28 withpad_to/truncate_at/label_key_pattern/body_key_pattern. No new builder, no new parser, nocalculate_fitmigration, no AI/Kei call.Guardrails
calculate_fitmigration (u4 is catalog-only)._WIP_FILES.md— both edits done atomically in u4.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543.Tests
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.13s.remaining_units
u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24
Notes:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YESfor u3).follow_up_issue_candidates
_slot_countpropagation (F9 builder enhancement): if Track C or a later axis decides F9 should accept the analysis.mdmax: 6range, thequadrant_flat_slotsbuilder needs to emit_slot_countintoslot_payloadso the partial's{% set slot_count = slot_payload._slot_count or 5 %}can render a 6th pill. Out of scope for IMP-04b (catalog-only); flag for a follow-up if a 6-item MDX surface emerges and theabort_or_reviewdecision rejects it.nth-child(5n+1..5n)which silently reuses colors at the 6th pill. Cosmetic; only relevant if the previous follow-up is taken up.(Both are advisory only — no new issue filed in this turn.)
[Codex #19] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u4 F9 WIP absorb
Unit verified: u4 only.
Verdict: correct for u4 only. The unit stays within the Stage 2 size cap: the u4 catalog block contributes 39 inserted lines in
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamland the WIP ledger change is 1 insertion / 1 deletion intemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md, for 40 insertions total against the 50-line cap.Functional checks pass for u4.
frame_contracts.yaml::pre_construction_model_info_stackedis present withtemplate_id: pre_construction_model_info_stacked,frame_id: 1171281180,family: list,source_shape: top_bullets,cardinality: min 4 / max 5,.f9b__pill-rowsas the partial target, andpayload.builder: quadrant_flat_slotswithitem_parser: quadrant_item,pad_to: 5,truncate_at: 5, and thepill_{n}_label/pill_{n}_bodykey patterns._WIP_FILES.mdremoves thepre_construction_model_info_stacked.htmlWIP table row and records the u4 absorption note; the WIP table now has no.htmlrows.Upstream trace is sufficient for this unit. V4 full32 has
pre_construction_model_info_stackedfor frame1171281180under holdout04-1at rank 1 with confidence/base0.7114. The Figma source analysis identifies a list frame with cardinalityideal 5 / min 4 / max 6, andtexts.mdcontains the title plus five item lines. The current catalog cap of 5 is consistent with the existingquadrant_flat_slotsbuilder configuration for this unit (truncate_at: 5) and avoids a builder/runtime change, which is out of scope for u4.Scope note:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyis modified in the worktree from the earlier VP-exemption unit and was not treated as part of u4's file scope. It was used only as the focused baseline test required by the Stage 2 plan.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff --name-onlygit diff --numstat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdSelect-String -Path 'templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yaml','templates\phase_z2\families\_WIP_FILES.md' -Pattern '^pre_construction_model_info_stacked:','frame_id: 1171281180','source_shape: top_bullets','builder: quadrant_flat_slots','item_parser: quadrant_item','partial_target_path: "\.f9b__pill-rows"','pre_construction_model_info_stacked\.html','#42 IMP-04b u4'git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdrg -n -C 12 "target_id: 04-1|case_id: 04-1|sample_id: 04-1|deck.*04-1|1171281180|pre_construction_model_info_stacked" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlrg -n -C 10 "cardinality|ideal 5|min 4|max 6|top_bullets|1171281180" figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281180/analysis.md figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281180/texts.mdSelect-String -Path 'src\phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets','h3_subsections','ITEM_PARSERS','pillar_item','quadrant_item','compare_row_2col_item'Select-String -Path 'scripts\smoke_frame_render.py' -Pattern 'template_id','render-to','argparse'$lines = Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yaml'; $start = ($lines | Select-String -Pattern '^pre_construction_model_info_stacked:' | Select-Object -First 1).LineNumber; $end = $lines.Count; Write-Output "start=$start end=$end block_lines=$($end-$start+1)"; $lines[($start-1)..($end-1)]$w = Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\families\_WIP_FILES.md'; $w | Select-String -Pattern 'pre_construction_model_info_stacked\.html|app_sw_package_vs_solution\.html|#42 IMP-04b u4|\|.*.html\|'python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q$keys = Select-String -Path 'templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*:'; "top_level_contracts=$($keys.Count)"; $keys | Select-Object -Last 5git diff -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281180/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281180/texts.mdtemplates/phase_z2/families/pre_construction_model_info_stacked.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q->3 passed in 0.13sVerified facts:
pre_construction_model_info_stackedas the 13th top-level catalog contract.pre_construction_model_info_stacked.htmlWIP table row and leaves no.htmlentries in the WIP table body.04-1ranks frame1171281180/pre_construction_model_info_stackedfirst with confidence/base0.7114.top_bullets/h3_subsectionsandITEM_PARSERSincludesquadrant_item.template_idand--render-to.calculate_fitmigration, or production refactor was used for this verification.Remaining units: [u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #20] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b unit u5 F24 TrackA VP deep-review repr
Executing unit: u5
unit_executed
u5 (F24
1171281204engn_sw_three_types— TrackA VP deep-review representative; CAT-only catalog-completeness activation withvisual_pending: trueexemption flag, no family partial authored)files_changed
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(+45 / -0)Total = 45 ins / 0 del (exactly at the Stage 2 u5 cap of 45). Cumulative worktree on the two IMP-04b CAT+WIP files post-u5: CAT +132 / 0, WIP +3 / -2 (u2 axis on
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyis the VP exemption, not part of u5 file scope).diff_summary
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml— appendengn_sw_three_types:as the 14th top-level catalog key (post-u4 was 13). Layout :bim_dx_comparison_table2-col → 3-col variant), thevisual_pending: truerationale (no family partial), and the new mapper wire deferred to a separate IMP (builder =compare_table_3col, parser =compare_row_3col_item).template_id: engn_sw_three_types,frame_id: 1171281204,family: table,visual_pending: true(VP exemption flag — matched by_load_vp_exempt_keysattests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:54-65).source_shape: top_bullets(mappersplit_sourceallow-list atsrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104).cardinality.strict: 3= 3 data columns (col_a / col_b / col_c) — NOT row count (F18 precedent at L401-405 of the catalog).overflow_policy: abort_or_review.role_order: [col_a, col_b, col_c](flow-style for compactness — Stage 2 cap requires <= 45 ins).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350(F18 equivalent class : 4 data row × ~50 + col-header 30 + title 30 + padding 30 + buffer).accepted_content_types: [text_block].sub_zones: 3 column headers (col_a_header/col_b_header/col_c_header, eachrole: header,cardinality.strict: 1,partial_target_pathplaceholders pointing at the future.f24b__header > .f24b__header-cell:nth-child(2..4)selectors — mirrors F18 (.f18b__header-cell:nth-child(2/3)) extended for a 3rd data column) plus arowsdata container (role: data,cardinality: {min: 1, max: 8},partial_target_path: ".f24b__rows"). Row range : sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/texts.mdshows 4 row labels (개념 / 개발주체 / 성과품 / S/W의 사용);max: 8buffer follows the F18 max-row safety pattern (F18 max 12 for 2-col, F24 narrower to 8 since 3-col cells become wider).payload.title.source: section.title;payload.builder: compare_table_3col(NEW pending mapper wire — declared in catalog only, mapperPAYLOAD_BUILDERSatsrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:640-647does NOT yet containcompare_table_3col. This is consistent with the VP nature of this entry — no family partial meansmap_with_contractis not invoked, so the missing builder does not break any runtime path).builder_options.item_parser: compare_row_3col_item(NEW pending parser, parallel to F18'scompare_row_2col_itematsrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265).max_rows: 8mirrorssub_zones.rows.cardinality.max.upstream trace (per RULE 5 — value + path + upstream)
frame_idfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/template_idtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:56light_edit,v4_full_rank: 3tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:54-68light_edit(≥ 0.75 ≤ 0.90) pertests/CLAUDE.mdfamilyfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/analysis.md:23structure 매칭 정보 → family: tablesource_shapesrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_sourceallow-listcardinality.strict: 3figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/analysis.md:26+index.html:52cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 3+ grid203px 1fr 1fr 1fr(1 label col + 3 data cols)sub_zones.rows.cardinality.max: 8figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/texts.md:13-16visual_pending: truetests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:54-65(u2 axis)templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_three_types.htmlon disk (verified vials templates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlpost-u4 = 13 files, no F24 partial)remaining_units
u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24
Notes :
.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md) and u2 (BT VP exemption attests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:54-121) were executed before u3 per the Stage 2 sequencing; they are not in the remaining list.follow_up_issue_candidates
None scope-lock-external. The new
compare_table_3colbuilder +compare_row_3col_itemparser are declared but not yet wired — they are the runtime production complement to this contract and are explicitly out-of-scope for IMP-04b u5 (CAT-only per Stage 2 unit definition; production refactor for new builders/parsers is a separate IMP axis). When a family partial forengn_sw_three_typesis authored (a future Track A promotion IMP), that IMP also wires the new builder/parser intosrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265(ITEM_PARSERS) and:640-647(PAYLOAD_BUILDERS), at which point thevisual_pending: trueflag is dropped per the u2 invariant attests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:106-121(VP-exempt entry must NOT have a disk partial).evidence
git diff --numstat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md→ CAT +132 / 0 (u3 48 + u4 39 + u5 45 = 132 cumulative); WIP +3 / -2 (u3 + u4 absorbs)git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 132 insertions(+)yaml.safe_load(...)→ 14 top-level keys (was 13 post-u4)engn_sw_three_typesin catalog: Trueframe_id: 1171281204,visual_pending: True,source_shape: top_bulletscardinality: {'strict': 3, 'overflow_policy': 'abort_or_review'}builder: compare_table_3colsub_zone ids: ['col_a_header', 'col_b_header', 'col_c_header', 'rows']python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed (test_contracts_set_equals_disk_families_minus_wip + test_wip_allowlist_is_disk_only_and_uncontracted + test_vp_exempt_keys_are_contracted_and_disk_absent). The newengn_sw_three_typesentry satisfies the VP-exempt invariant (in catalog AND absent from disk).grep -nE "^[a-z][a-z_]+:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | wc -l→ 14 top-level keys.Audit anchor : per the Stage 2 plan's
axis_coverage(4 pre-flight axes), this unit reads from axis_2 (figma_to_html_agent block artifacts), trace-cites axis_1 (source_shape: top_bullets), declares a new ITEM_PARSER entry against axis_3 (compare_row_3col_item— pending wire), and does NOT modify the smoke runner (axis_4 read-only, unchanged).Per Stage 3 strict-1-unit rule : STOPPING here. Not committing, not pushing, not advancing to u6.
[Codex #20] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u5 TrackA VP deep-review repr
Unit verified: u5 only.
Verdict: incorrect for u5. The catalog shape is mostly in scope and the focused baseline test passes, but the new
frame_contracts.yaml::engn_sw_three_typestrace line cites the wrong V4 source section: it saysV4 LE=1 (03-1 rank 3, 0.7571), whiletests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlshows the0.7571light-edit rank-3 judgment forengn_sw_three_typesunder01-2, not03-1. Under03-1, the same template is rank 7 with confidence/base0.6041and labelreject.That is a Stage 3 edit issue because the binding guardrails require catalog additions to be backed by V4 evidence and factual value/path/upstream trace. A one-line correction to the Reason comment should be enough if the intended evidence is the
01-2light-edit judgment; the rest of the u5 structure can then be re-verified.Size and scope checks otherwise look acceptable for this unit. The
engn_sw_three_typesblock is 43 content lines plus 2 preceding blank separator lines, matching the claimed 45 inserted lines for u5, and notemplates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_three_types.htmlpartial exists, sovisual_pending: trueis consistent with the VP exemption axis.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qpassed with3 passed in 0.14s.Remaining units: [u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff --name-onlygit diff --numstat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pySelect-String -Path 'templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^engn_sw_three_types:','frame_id: 1171281204','visual_pending: true','source_shape: top_bullets','builder: compare_table_3col','compare_row_3col_item','partial_target_path: "\.f24b__'git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qrg -n -C 8 "1171281204|engn_sw_three_types|03-1|rank: 3|0\.7571|LE=1" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlrg -n -C 10 "1171281204|cardinality|top_bullets|engn|S/W|software|three|3|row|title" figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/analysis.md figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/texts.mdSelect-String -Path 'tests\test_family_contract_baseline.py' -Pattern '_load_vp_exempt_keys','visual_pending','missing_partials','PAYLOAD_BUILDERS','ITEM_PARSERS' -Context 3,5Select-String -Path 'src\phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets','h3_subsections','ITEM_PARSERS','pillar_item','quadrant_item','compare_row_2col_item','PAYLOAD_BUILDERS' -Context 2,4Select-String -Path 'scripts\smoke_frame_render.py' -Pattern 'template_id','render-to','argparse' -Context 2,3Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\blocks\1171281204' -Force | Select-Object Name,LengthTest-Path -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\families\engn_sw_three_types.html'engn_sw_three_typesblock inframe_contracts.yamlengn_sw_three_typeskey count, VP flag, sub-zone IDs, builder, and item_parserrg -n -C 12 "^ 01-2:|^ 03-1:|frame_id: '1171281204'|template_id: engn_sw_three_types|confidence: 0\.7571|confidence: 0\.6041|v4_full_rank: 3|v4_full_rank: 7" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamllines 819-861git diff --numstat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/index.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q->3 passed in 0.14sVerified facts:
engn_sw_three_typesis present withframe_id: 1171281204,family: table,visual_pending: true,source_shape: top_bullets,cardinality.strict: 3, 3 header sub-zones, one rows sub-zone,builder: compare_table_3col, anditem_parser: compare_row_3col_item.templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_three_types.htmlfile exists, so the VP flag is consistent with the baseline-test exemption axis.01-2hasengn_sw_three_typesat rank 3, confidence/base0.7571, labellight_edit;03-1hasengn_sw_three_typesat rank 7, confidence/base0.6041, labelreject.rewind_target: stage_3_edit
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #21] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b unit u5 trace correction (rewind from Codex #20)
Executing unit: u5
Rewind context (Codex #20 NO → Stage 3 retry for u5 only)
engn_sw_three_typesReason comment citedV4 LE=1 (03-1 rank 3, 0.7571), but intests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlthe 0.7571 light_edit rank-3 judgment lives under section01-2(line 56, header :19). Under03-1(header :993) the same template is rank 7, confidence 0.6041, labelreject(line 1090).01-2light-edit judgment; the rest of the u5 structure can then be re-verified."unit_executed
u5 (F24
1171281204engn_sw_three_types— TrackA VP deep-review representative; CAT-only withvisual_pending: trueexemption flag; trace annotation corrected to match the V4 evidence file actually cited).files_changed
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(1 line modified — Reason comment only)Cumulative worktree on IMP-04b CAT+WIP+BT files post-u5 (u1..u5): CAT +135 / 0 (3 new top-level entries), WIP +3 / -2 (u3+u4 absorbs), BT +46 / -5 (u2 VP exemption). u5 trace fix is
+1 / -1on top.diff_summary
Single-line change inside the existing
engn_sw_three_types:block attemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:820:Only the section citation
03-1→01-2flips.LE=1(count of light_edit-tier judgments across all 10 MDX sections for this template),rank 3, and0.7571are all unchanged because they were already correct.upstream trace (per RULE 5 — value + path + upstream)
01-2tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1901-2:section header at line 19; section spans 19..505.engn_sw_three_typestests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:56template_id: engn_sw_three_typesinside the01-2section block.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:68v4_full_rank: 3inside the same judgment block.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:57confidence: 0.7571,base: 0.7571,penalty: 0.0.light_edittests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:60label: light_edit— threshold ≥ 0.75 pertests/CLAUDE.mdV4 label table.01-2row meets ≥ 0.75 light_edit tier. LE=1 confirmed.03-1tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:99303-1,engn_sw_three_typesis rank 7 / 0.6041 / labelreject(line 1090..1102). The prior trace conflated the two sections.guardrail_check
scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543— unchanged, untouched.baseline test
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.14s(BT including u2 VP exemption logic still green;engn_sw_three_typescontinues to register underdisk - vp_exemptinvariant viavisual_pending: true).remaining_units
u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11 (TrackA VP entries — checklist-shortened review per Stage 2 plan).
u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23 (TrackB contract-first VP entries).
u24 (32/32 + WIP==0 gate; BT only).
Notes:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py +46 / -5) / u3 (F23 WIP absorb) / u4 (F9 WIP absorb) / u5 (this unit) already authored in the working tree from prior rounds; no commit / push per-unit per Stage 3 protocol.follow_up_issue_candidates
None. The failure was an annotation accuracy issue inside the V4 evidence cross-reference, not a new axis. Stage 1 scope-lock and Stage 2 unit plan both stand.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Editontemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:820(single-line Reason comment,03-1→01-2).git diff -U0 templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ all three new# Reason :lines visible;engn_sw_three_typestrace now readsV4 LE=1 (01-2 rank 3, 0.7571).python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.14s.V4 evidence cross-checked:
tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:19(01-2:) →:54-68judgment block → engn_sw_three_types rank 3, 0.7571, light_edit. CONFIRMS01-2citation.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:993(03-1:) →:1088-1102judgment block → engn_sw_three_types rank 7, 0.6041, reject. CONFIRMS the previous03-1citation was wrong.01-2meets ≥ 0.75).Pre-flight 4-axis verification (per issue body) — unchanged from r3, restated for completeness:
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104(split_source allow-list{top_bullets, h3_subsections}) → u5 usessource_shape: top_bullets, allowed.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}→ source has 3 data columns + 4 row labels (개념 / 개발주체 / 성과품 / S/W의 사용); no family partial intemplates/phase_z2/families/(justifiesvisual_pending: true).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265(ITEM_PARSERS) → u5 declarescompare_row_3col_itemas the future parser; mapper wire-up deferred to a separate IMP (consistent withvisual_pending: true— nomap_with_contractinvocation path).scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543→ argparse surface unchanged.Guardrails respected:
calculate_fitmigration_WIP_FILES.mdmovement for u5)scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543(Stage 1 corrected range)STOP per Stage 3 protocol — no commit, no push. Gitea comment is the deliverable.
[Codex #22] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u5 trace correction
Verdict: correct for u5 only.
The retry edit fixes the prior trace defect.
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:820now citesV4 LE=1 (01-2 rank 3, 0.7571)forengn_sw_three_types. The V4 source confirms thattests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:19starts section01-2, and the same section containstemplate_id: engn_sw_three_types,confidence: 0.7571,label: light_edit, andv4_full_rank: 3at lines 56-68. The rejected03-1judgment remains a different source block: section03-1begins at line 993, andengn_sw_three_typesthere is rank 7 with confidence0.6041and labelrejectat lines 1090-1102.Scope is acceptable for this unit. The
engn_sw_three_typescatalog entry is CAT-only, carriesvisual_pending: true, points to frame1171281204, usessource_shape: top_bullets, and defines the expected three-column header plus rows projection withcompare_table_3colandcompare_row_3col_item. The visual-pending flag is consistent with the filesystem check:templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_three_types.htmlis absent whilefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/index.htmlexists.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortSelect-String -LiteralPath 'templates\\phase_z2\\catalog\\frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^engn_sw_three_types:|V4 LE=1|visual_pending|partial_target_path|compare_table_3col|compare_row_3col_item' -Context 0,3Select-String -LiteralPath 'tests\\matching\\v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern '^ 01-2:|template_id: engn_sw_three_types|v4_full_rank: 3|confidence: 0.7571|label: light_edit|^ 03-1:|v4_full_rank: 7|confidence: 0.6041|label: reject' -Context 0,2Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates\\phase_z2\\families\\engn_sw_three_types.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\\blocks\\1171281204\\index.html'git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | Select-String -Pattern 'engn_sw_three_types|03-1 rank 3|01-2 rank 3|visual_pending|compare_table_3col|compare_row_3col_item' -Context 3,3Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\\phase_z2\\catalog\\frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 818 -First 44Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\\matching\\v4_full32_result.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 18 -First 52; Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\\matching\\v4_full32_result.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 992 -First 112python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_three_types.htmlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/index.htmlTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q->3 passed in 0.14sVerified facts:
frame_contracts.yaml:820cites01-2 rank 3, 0.7571, not the incorrect03-1 rank 3trace.v4_full32_result.yaml:56-68supportsengn_sw_three_typesas01-2rank 3, confidence0.7571, labellight_edit.v4_full32_result.yaml:1090-1102shows the separate03-1judgment is rank 7, confidence0.6041, labelreject.templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_three_types.htmlis absent andfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204/index.htmlexists, supportingvisual_pending: truefor u5.Remaining units: [u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #23] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b unit u6 TrackA VP checklist (F27 bim_adoption_central_split)
Executing unit: u6
unit_executed
u6 (F27
1171281208bim_adoption_central_split— TrackA VP checklist; CAT-only withvisual_pending: trueexemption; new builder/parsercentral_split_synthesis+arm_label_body_itemdeclared for later wire-up).files_changed
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(+50 / 0, appended afterengn_sw_three_typesblock which ends at line 861)No other files touched. No partial authored (Track A VP = CAT-only). No mapper / builder code added (declared for future IMP per scope-lock).
diff_summary
Appended one new top-level entry to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:Cumulative IMP-04b worktree (CAT+WIP+BT) post-u6:
_WIP_FILES.md.test_vp_exempt_keys_are_contracted_and_disk_absent+ helper).upstream trace (RULE 5 — value + path + upstream)
01-2tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1901-2:section header at L19.bim_adoption_central_splittests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:8601-2.0.6455tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:8701-2.restructuretests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:905tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:9801-2.03-2tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:148003-2:section header at L1480.0.6278tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:154803-2.4tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:154403-2(note: rank line precedes template_id per yaml order).1171281208tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:84frame_id: '1171281208'.27tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:85frame_number: 27.comparefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/analysis.md:26**family**: compare.central-split-synthesisfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/analysis.md:27**layout**: central-split-synthesis.2figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/analysis.md:30**cardinality**: ideal 2 / min 2 / max 2.header, left_arm, right_arm, center_result, conclusionfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/analysis.md:31**slots** (5개, required 4개): header, left_arm, right_arm, center_result, conclusion.top_bulletssrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_sourceallow-list (Stage 1 axis_1).templates/phase_z2/families/bim_adoption_central_split.htmlABSENTTest-Path→ False; index.html present atfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/index.html.V4 judgment distribution (per grep across all 10 MDX sections): RS=2, reject=8, LE=0, UAI=0. Best = 01-2 rank 5 conf 0.6455 RS. All other sections (03-1, 04-1, 01-1, 02-1, etc.) yield rank 13–27 reject with confidence 0.13–0.25.
test verification
test_contracts_set_equals_disk_families_minus_wipPASS (new VP entry counted viavpset, notextra).test_wip_allowlist_is_disk_only_and_uncontractedPASS (no WIP overlap with u6).test_vp_exempt_keys_are_contracted_and_disk_absentPASS (bim_adoption_central_splitinvp, not on disk).Catalog top-level key count post-u6: 15 (was 14 after u5).
guardrails honored
abort_or_review(no truncation).remaining_units
[u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
Stage 2 plan = 24 units total. Executed so far (cumulative): u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6. Remaining = 18.
Next per Stage 2 plan: u7 =
bigroom_system_components(frame1171281178) TrackA VP checklist.follow_up_issue_candidates
None new this turn. Pre-existing follow-up axes already enumerated by Stage 1 scope-lock (out-of-scope list):
scripts/smoke_frame_render.pyargparse refactor (separate IMP).central_split_synthesisbuilder +arm_label_body_itemparser implementation (separate IMP wiring per declared builder).The u6 contract declares
central_split_synthesis+arm_label_body_itemmirroring the u5 pattern of declaring new builder/parser names that are wired in a later IMP. This is intentional and consistent with the IMP-04b "catalog-extension only" scope-lock.STOP
No commit, no push. Gitea comment is the deliverable. Awaiting Codex verification on u6 before continuing to u7.
[Codex #24] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u6 TrackA VP checklist
Verdict: incorrect for u6 only.
The new
bim_adoption_central_splitcatalog entry is structurally in scope and the focused baseline test passes, but its Reason trace cites one wrong V4 rank.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:865saysV4 RS=2 best (01-2 rank 5, 0.6455; 03-2 rank 4, 0.6278). The01-2citation is correct:tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:86-98hastemplate_id: bim_adoption_central_split,confidence: 0.6455,label: restructure, andv4_full_rank: 5.The
03-2citation is not correct. Section03-2starts attests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1480, and thebim_adoption_central_splitblock attests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1547-1559hasconfidence: 0.6278,label: restructure, andv4_full_rank: 5. The nearbyv4_full_rank: 4at line 1544 belongs to the previous candidate block, not tobim_adoption_central_split. A one-line correction from03-2 rank 4to03-2 rank 5should be enough if the intended evidence is the03-2restructure judgment.Scope checks otherwise pass for this unit. The entry is CAT-only, carries
visual_pending: true, points to frame1171281208, usessource_shape: top_bullets, defines header, left_arm, right_arm, center_result, and conclusion sub-zones, and declarescentral_split_synthesiswitharm_label_body_itemfor later mapper wire-up. The visual-pending condition is consistent with the filesystem:templates/phase_z2/families/bim_adoption_central_split.htmlis absent whilefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/index.html,analysis.md, andtexts.mdexist. The source analysis supports the central split shape and slot claim atfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/analysis.md:27-31.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortSelect-String -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^bim_adoption_central_split:|V4 RS=2|visual_pending|frame_id: 1171281208|source_shape: top_bullets|central_split_synthesis|arm_label_body_item|partial_target_path' -Context 0,4Select-String -LiteralPath 'tests\matching\v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern '^ 01-2:|^ 03-2:|template_id: bim_adoption_central_split|v4_full_rank: 5|v4_full_rank: 4|confidence: 0.6455|confidence: 0.6278|label: restructure' -Context 0,3Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\families\bim_adoption_central_split.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\blocks\1171281208\index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\blocks\1171281208\analysis.md'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\blocks\1171281208\texts.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 862 -First 52Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\matching\v4_full32_result.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 78 -First 24Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\matching\v4_full32_result.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 1540 -First 24Select-String -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\blocks\1171281208\analysis.md' -Pattern 'slot|required|Frame|F27|central|split|arm|center|conclusion' -Context 2,2git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | Select-String -Pattern 'bim_adoption_central_split|V4 RS=2|frame_id: 1171281208|visual_pending|central_split_synthesis|arm_label_body_item|f27b' -Context 3,3python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/index.htmlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/texts.mdtemplates/phase_z2/families/bim_adoption_central_split.htmlTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q->3 passed in 0.15sVerified facts:
frame_contracts.yaml:865cites03-2 rank 4, 0.6278forbim_adoption_central_split.v4_full32_result.yaml:1547-1559supports03-2 confidence 0.6278,label: restructure, andv4_full_rank: 5, not rank 4.v4_full32_result.yaml:1544is rank 4 for the previous candidate block, so the catalog Reason line copied the wrong nearby rank.v4_full32_result.yaml:86-98supports the01-2 rank 5, 0.6455part of the Reason line.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/analysis.md:27-31supportscentral-split-synthesis, cardinality 2, and slots 5 required 4.templates/phase_z2/families/bim_adoption_central_split.htmlis absent;figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/index.html,analysis.md, andtexts.mdare present.Remaining units: [u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: stage_3_edit
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #25] Stage 3 code-edit - IMP-04b unit u6 TrackA VP checklist (rewind fix)
Executing unit: u6
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
■ diff_summary
03-2 rank 4, 0.6278→03-2 rank 5, 0.6278bim_adoption_central_splitblock unchanged (template_id / frame_id / family / visual_pending / source_shape / cardinality / role_order / sub_zones / payload all intact from prior u6 commit).■ Reason fix evidence (Codex #24 mismatch resolved)
tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:84-98 → frame_id 1171281208, template_id bim_adoption_central_split, confidence 0.6455, label restructure, v4_full_rank 5 ✓ (matches Reason "01-2 rank 5, 0.6455")
tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1545-1559 → frame_id 1171281208, template_id bim_adoption_central_split, confidence 0.6278, label restructure, v4_full_rank 5 ✓ (Reason now reads "03-2 rank 5, 0.6278")
■ baseline test (focused, u6 scope)
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.14s (no regression).■ remaining_units (from Stage 2 plan minus executed)
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
■ guardrail re-check
[Codex #25] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u6 rewind fix
Verdict: correct for u6. The repaired catalog Reason line now cites
03-2 rank 5, 0.6278, which matches thebim_adoption_central_splitV4 candidate block. The earlier nearbyv4_full_rank: 4belongs to the previous candidate, not tobim_adoption_central_split.Scope status: u6 remains CAT-only. The
bim_adoption_central_splitentry keepstemplate_id,frame_id: 1171281208,visual_pending: true,source_shape: top_bullets,strict: 2,role_order: [left_arm, right_arm], the five expected sub-zones, andbuilder: central_split_synthesis/item_parser: arm_label_body_item. Source index exists for frame1171281208; the family partial is still absent, sovisual_pending: trueis still justified.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern 'bim_adoption_central_split|V4 RS=2 best|frame_id: 1171281208|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets' -Context 2,8Select-String -LiteralPath 'tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern 'bim_adoption_central_split|frame_id: 1171281208|confidence: 0.6455|confidence: 0.6278|v4_full_rank: 5|v4_full_rank: 4' -Context 3,5git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit status --shortTest-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/bim_adoption_central_split.html'Files checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/bim_adoption_central_split.htmlTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 3 passed in 0.14sVerified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:865now says01-2 rank 5, 0.6455; 03-2 rank 5, 0.6278.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:84-98hasframe_id: '1171281208',template_id: bim_adoption_central_split,confidence: 0.6455,label: restructure, andv4_full_rank: 5.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1545-1559hasframe_id: '1171281208',template_id: bim_adoption_central_split,confidence: 0.6278,label: restructure, andv4_full_rank: 5.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1544is the previous candidate's rank, so it is not valid evidence forbim_adoption_central_split.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281208/index.htmlexists;templates/phase_z2/families/bim_adoption_central_split.htmldoes not exist.Remaining units: [u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #26] Stage 3 code-edit - IMP-04b unit u7 TrackA VP checklist
Executing unit: u7
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
bigroom_system_components)■ diff_summary
bim_adoption_central_split(u6)..f7b__prefix (frame_number 7, b-suffix convention per u5/u6 precedent).■ Reason trace (V4 evidence, file:line surface)
## H/W 항목(7 items: Display, Server & Storage, Network, 회의시스템, CCTV, Dron Broadcasting, Sensor) +## S/W 항목(6 items: C.C.P, WatchBIM, Domainer, BCMF, Twin Highway, B.E.Ps) → variable-length list per column → col_a_items / col_b_items cardinality {min:1, max:8} aligns.visual_pending: true정당화.■ baseline test (focused, u7 scope)
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.15s (no regression).■ remaining_units (from Stage 2 plan minus executed; u1~u7 done)
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
paired_list_two_col+ parsercolumn_label_body_item은 새 mapper wire 가 필요하지만 본 IMP-04b 의 contract-first 원칙 (Stage 1 exit report scope_lock guardrails) 에 따라 별 IMP 로 분리. 본 unit 은 CAT-only 으로 종결.■ guardrail re-check
[Codex #26] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u7 TrackA VP checklist
Verdict: correct for u7. The new
bigroom_system_componentscatalog entry is in scope for the single executed unit and is supported by the cited V4 and figma_to_html evidence.Scope status: u7 is CAT-only for the unit under review. The entry keeps
template_id: bigroom_system_components,frame_id: 1171281178,family: compare,visual_pending: true,source_shape: top_bullets, top-levelstrict: 2,role_order: [col_a, col_b], five sub-zones (title,col_a_label,col_a_items,col_b_label,col_b_items), and the declared visual-pending builder/parser placeholderspaired_list_two_col/column_label_body_item. Sourceindex.htmlexists for frame1171281178; the Phase Z family partial does not, sovisual_pending: trueis justified.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlSelect-String -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern 'bigroom_system_components|frame_id: 1171281178|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|paired_list_two_col|column_label_body_item|f7b__' -Context 3,12Select-String -LiteralPath 'tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern 'bigroom_system_components|frame_id: 1171281178|confidence: 0.5352|confidence: 0.5054|v4_full_rank: 8|v4_full_rank: 7|label: reject' -Context 4,6Select-String -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/analysis.md' -Pattern 'family|layout|axis|relation_type|cardinality|title|col_a_label|col_a_items|col_b_label|col_b_items' -Context 2,4Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/bigroom_system_components.html'python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit status --shortrg -n "bigroom_system_components|frame_id: '1171281178'|confidence: 0\.5352|confidence: 0\.5054|v4_full_rank: 8|v4_full_rank: 7|anchor: 0\.25|cardinality: 1\.0|relation: 1\.0|slot: 1\.0|label: reject" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfortemplate_id == bigroom_system_componentsrg -n "^## H/W|^## S/W|^Display$|^Server|^Network$|^CCTV$|^Dron Broadcasting$|^Sensor$|^C\.C\.P$|^WatchBIM$|^Domainer$|^BCMF$|^Twin Highway$|^B\.E\.Ps" figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/texts.mdrg -n "^bigroom_system_components:|template_id: bigroom_system_components|frame_id: 1171281178|family: compare|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 2|role_order: \[col_a, col_b\]|id: title|id: col_a_label|id: col_a_items|id: col_b_label|id: col_b_items|builder: paired_list_two_col|item_parser: column_label_body_item|max_items_per_column: 8" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlrg -n "family|layout|axis|relation_type|cardinality|slots" figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/analysis.mdFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/bigroom_system_components.htmlTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 3 passed in 0.15sVerified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:913-960definesbigroom_system_componentswith frame1171281178, compare family,visual_pending: true, top_bullets source shape, strict two-column cardinality, the five expected sub-zones, and the declared VP builder/parser placeholders.bigroom_system_componentsjudgments and all arelabel: reject; the top confidence is01-2at0.5352, rank 8, with axesanchor: 0.25,cardinality: 1.0,relation: 1.0,slot: 1.0.03-2at0.5054, rank 7, alsolabel: reject, with axesanchor: 0.25,cardinality: 1.0,relation: 1.0,slot: 1.0.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/analysis.md:27-32says familycompare, layout2col-paired-list, horizontal compare relation, cardinality ideal/min/max 2, and slotstitle,col_a_label,col_a_items,col_b_label,col_b_items.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/texts.md:3-30has H/W and S/W sections with 7 and 6 listed item labels respectively, consistent with variable per-column item cardinality capped at 8.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281178/index.htmlexists;templates/phase_z2/families/bigroom_system_components.htmldoes not exist.Remaining units: [u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #27] Stage 3 code-edit - IMP-04b unit u8 TrackA VP checklist
Executing unit: u8
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
model_specialized_engn_sw)■ diff_summary
bigroom_system_components(u7)..f22b__prefix (frame_number 22, b-suffix convention per u5/u6/u7 precedent).■ Reason trace (V4 evidence + source-structure evidence, file:line surface)
visual_pending: true정당화.■ Scope-lock + axis coverage (re-check per Stage 1/2 contract)
top_bullets(within allow-list —h3_subsections미사용)numbered_item_body는 mapper-wire IMP 에서 등록 (u8 scope 외)■ baseline test (focused, u8 scope)
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.16s (no regression).model_specialized_engn_swblock sub_zones count = 5.■ remaining_units (from Stage 2 plan minus executed)
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
split_panel_numberedbuilder +numbered_item_bodyparser wires remain visual_pending until family partial + mapper IMP authored (out-of-scope per IMP-04b, deferred to a future mapper-wire IMP as documented in u5/u6/u7 Reason traces).■ guardrail re-check
[Codex #27] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u8 TrackA VP checklist
Verdict: correct for u8. The new
model_specialized_engn_swcatalog entry is in scope for the single executed unit and is supported by the cited V4 and figma_to_html evidence.Scope status: u8 is CAT-only for the unit under review. The entry keeps
template_id: model_specialized_engn_sw,frame_id: 1171281202,family: diagram,visual_pending: true,source_shape: top_bullets, top-levelstrict: 3,role_order: [item_1, item_2, item_3], five sub-zones (title,category_panel,item_1_body,item_2_body,item_3_body), and the declared visual-pending builder/parser placeholderssplit_panel_numbered/numbered_item_body. Sourceindex.htmlexists for frame1171281202; the Phase Z family partial does not, sovisual_pending: trueis justified.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlrg -n "^model_specialized_engn_sw:|template_id: model_specialized_engn_sw|frame_id: 1171281202|family: diagram|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 3|role_order: \[item_1, item_2, item_3\]|id: title|id: category_panel|id: item_1_body|id: item_2_body|id: item_3_body|builder: split_panel_numbered|item_parser: numbered_item_body|f22b__" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlrg -n "model_specialized_engn_sw|frame_id: '1171281202'|confidence: 0\.4065|confidence: 0\.5301|confidence: 0\.4986|confidence: 0\.3778|confidence: 0\.749|confidence: 0\.7267|confidence: 0\.212|confidence: 0\.4502|confidence: 0\.6393|confidence: 0\.6823|v4_full_rank: 12|v4_full_rank: 9|v4_full_rank: 3|v4_full_rank: 6|v4_full_rank: 5|label: restructure|label: reject" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlrg -n "family|layout|axis|relation_type|cardinality|slots|title|category_panel|item_1_body|item_2_body|item_3_body" figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/analysis.mdGet-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/model_specialized_engn_sw.html'python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit status --shorttemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:963-1009model_specialized_engn_swV4 candidate rows intests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/model_specialized_engn_sw.htmlTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 3 passed in 0.16sVerified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:963-1009contains exactly the newmodel_specialized_engn_swcontract structure claimed for u8.01-2rank 12 confidence 0.4065 reject;02-2.2rank 9 confidence 0.5301 reject;03-1rank 9 confidence 0.4986 reject;03-2rank 9 confidence 0.3778 reject.01-1rank 3 confidence 0.749 restructure;02-1rank 3 confidence 0.7267 reject;02-2.1rank 6 confidence 0.212 reject;04-1rank 5 confidence 0.4502 reject;04-2.1rank 6 confidence 0.6393 reject;04-2.2rank 5 confidence 0.6823 reject.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/analysis.md:26-31reportsfamily: diagram,layout: split-panel-numbered, horizontal parallel relation, cardinality ideal 3 / min 3 / max 4, and the five required slots used by the contract.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/texts.mdcontains the title, left category panel content, and right numbered-item body content expected by the split-panel-numbered source shape.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281202/index.htmlexists;templates/phase_z2/families/model_specialized_engn_sw.htmldoes not exist.git status --shortshows other pre-existing modified/untracked files in the worktree, but the u8 diff under review is confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml.Remaining units: [u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #28] Stage 3 code-edit - IMP-04b unit u9 TrackA VP checklist
Executing unit: u9
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
sw_development_cycle_six_nodes)■ diff_summary
model_specialized_engn_sw(u8)..f1b__prefix (frame_number 1, b-suffix convention per u5/u6/u7/u8 precedent).■ Reason trace (V4 evidence + source-structure evidence, file:line surface)
V4 evidence (10 mdx_sections × 1 candidate row each for this frame_id) — 모든 10 sections label = reject:
Source structure evidence (figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/):
circular-nodes-6패턴 confirm.Source artifact existence:
visual_pending: true정당화; ls 결과 14 family partials 중sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.html없음)■ baseline test (focused, u9 scope)
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.17s (no regression)■ scope-lock guardrails
■ remaining_units (from Stage 2 plan minus executed)
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
circular_nodes_six/node_label_item) are visual-pending mapper wires for a separate future IMP — consistent with u5-u8 deferral.[Codex #28] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u9 TrackA VP checklist
Verdict: incorrect for u9 only.
The new
sw_development_cycle_six_nodescatalog entry is structurally in scope and the focused baseline test passes, but its V4 Reason trace has one wrong rank citation.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1013saysbest non-holdout 02-2.2 rank 21, 0.2261. Intests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:826-840, thesw_development_cycle_six_nodesblock hasconfidence: 0.2261,label: reject, andv4_full_rank: 22. The nearbyv4_full_rank: 21at line 825 belongs to the previous candidate block, not tosw_development_cycle_six_nodes.A one-line correction from
02-2.2 rank 21to02-2.2 rank 22should be enough if the intended evidence is the02-2.2reject judgment.Scope checks otherwise pass for this unit. The entry is CAT-only, carries
visual_pending: true, points to frame1171281172, usessource_shape: top_bullets, defines title plus six node sub-zones, and declares the visual-pending builder/parser placeholderscircular_nodes_six/node_label_item. Sourceindex.htmlexists for frame1171281172; the Phase Z family partial is absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlrg -n "^sw_development_cycle_six_nodes:|template_id: sw_development_cycle_six_nodes|frame_id: 1171281172|family: diagram|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 6|role_order: \[node_1, node_2, node_3, node_4, node_5, node_6\]|id: title|id: node_1|id: node_2|id: node_3|id: node_4|id: node_5|id: node_6|builder: circular_nodes_six|item_parser: node_label_item|f1b__" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlrg -n "sw_development_cycle_six_nodes|frame_id: '1171281172'|confidence: 0\.1115|confidence: 0\.2261|confidence: 0\.1694|confidence: 0\.1127|confidence: 0\.424|confidence: 0\.3829|confidence: 0\.1427|v4_full_rank: 26|v4_full_rank: 21|v4_full_rank: 25|v4_full_rank: 17|v4_full_rank: 20|v4_full_rank: 13|label: reject|anchor: 0\.1667|cardinality: 0\.0|relation: 1\.0|slot: 0\.5" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltemplate_id: sw_development_cycle_six_nodesV4 candidate blocksrg -n "family|layout|axis|relation_type|cardinality|slots|title|node_1|node_2|node_3|node_4|node_5|node_6" figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/analysis.mdGet-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.html'python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit status --shortFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.htmlTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 3 passed in 0.17sVerified facts:
sw_development_cycle_six_nodesis present and matches the claimed frame/schema shape.01-2block matchesrank 26, 0.1115, reject.02-2.2block attests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:826-840matchesconfidence: 0.2261, reject, butv4_full_rank: 22, not 21.03-1block matchesrank 25, 0.1694, reject.03-2block matchesrank 26, 0.1127, reject.layout: circular-nodes-6,cardinality: ideal 6 / min 6 / max 6, and slotstitle, node_1, node_2, node_3, node_4, node_5, node_6.index.htmlexists and Phase Z family partialsw_development_cycle_six_nodes.htmldoes not exist.Remaining units: [u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: stage_3_edit
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #29] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u9 TrackA VP rank citation fix (rewind from Codex #28)
Executing unit: u9
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
■ diff_summary
sw_development_cycle_six_nodesReason comment attemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1013.best non-holdout 02-2.2 rank 21, 0.2261→best non-holdout 02-2.2 rank 22, 0.2261.v4_full32_result.yamlcarriesv4_full_rank: 21for the previous candidate (bim_current_problems_paired); thesw_development_cycle_six_nodesblock at lines 826-840 is rank 22 with confidence 0.2261. Original u9 comment misattributed rank 21 to sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:401-413)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1360-1372)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:1862-1874)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:2214-2226)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
=== EVIDENCE ===
git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | grep "02-2.2 rank"→ two02-2.2 rankcites total:02-2.2 rank 9, 0.5301(untouched, matchesv4_full32_result.yamlfor model_specialized_engn_sw at 02-2.2).02-2.2 rank 22, 0.2261(corrected this round).tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:506→02-2.2:section header (section bounds 506–992).tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:811-825→template_id: bim_current_problems_paired,confidence: 0.2362,v4_full_rank: 21(the rank that the original u9 comment misattributed).tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:826-840→template_id: sw_development_cycle_six_nodes,confidence: 0.2261,label: reject,v4_full_rank: 22(the correct rank for u9).python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.17s.DO NOT commit or push. The Gitea comment IS the deliverable.
[Codex #30] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u9 rank citation fix
Verdict: correct for u9.
The single-line correction in templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml is valid. The
sw_development_cycle_six_nodesReason line now cites02-2.2 rank 22, 0.2261, which matches thesw_development_cycle_six_nodesV4 evidence block in tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml. The previously cited rank 21 belongs to the precedingbim_current_problems_pairedcandidate in the same 02-2.2 section.Unit boundary check: the verified scope remains CAT-only for u9. The contract still points to frame_id 1171281172, keeps
visual_pending: true, usessource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict six-node cardinality, carries title plus node_1 through node_6 sub-zones, and keeps the visual-pending mapper placeholderscircular_nodes_six/node_label_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/index.htmlexists, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.htmlis absent, so visual_pending remains justified.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^sw_development_cycle_six_nodes:|02-2\.2 rank|frame_id: 1171281172|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|circular_nodes_six|node_label_item|node_6' -Context 0,2Select-String -Path 'tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern 'template_id: sw_development_cycle_six_nodes|confidence: 0\.2261|v4_full_rank: 22|template_id: bim_current_problems_paired|confidence: 0\.2362|v4_full_rank: 21|^ 02-2\.2:' -Context 0,2Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.html'; git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.htmlTest results:
3 passed in 0.17sVerified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1013citesbest non-holdout 02-2.2 rank 22, 0.2261forsw_development_cycle_six_nodes.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:826-840containstemplate_id: sw_development_cycle_six_nodes,confidence: 0.2261, andv4_full_rank: 22.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml:813-825containstemplate_id: bim_current_problems_paired,confidence: 0.2362, andv4_full_rank: 21.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281172/index.htmlexists.templates/phase_z2/families/sw_development_cycle_six_nodes.htmlis absent.Remaining units: [u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #31] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u10 TrackA VP F3 overseas_bim_numbered_list (continue_same from Codex #30)
Executing unit: u10
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
■ diff_summary
overseas_bim_numbered_list:appended aftersw_development_cycle_six_nodes:(u9 anchor). 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved (CAT-only; no WIP/test edits).template_id: overseas_bim_numbered_list/frame_id: 1171281174/family: list/visual_pending: truesource_shape: top_bullets(axis 1 =src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104enum)cardinality: strict: 4+overflow_policy: abort_or_review—analysis.mdcardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4→ strict 4 (numbered list, 가변 항목 없음)role_order: [item_1, item_2, item_3, item_4]↔ analysis.md slots:title + item_1..item_4(5 required 5)visual_hints.min_height_px: 350(peer parity vssw_development_cycle_six_nodes350 /model_specialized_engn_sw350; visual-pending floor)accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 5:title(header strict 1,.f3b__title) +item_1..item_4(data strict 1 each,.f3b__item--{N}) — frame_number 3 →f3b__prefix (u9f1b__peer pattern for frame_number 1)payload.builder: numbered_list_four+builder_options.item_parser: numbered_label_body_item— visual-pending placeholder builder/parser (new mapper wire = 별 IMP, NOT in u10 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call")v4_full32_result.yaml:766-780):414-428):1238-1252):1815-1829):2182-2196) — highest of 10 sections but still reject (< 0.60 threshold)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py).overseas_bim_numbered_list∈ catalog ∧visual_pending: true∧templates/phase_z2/families/overseas_bim_numbered_list.htmlabsent (vp ∩ disk == ∅).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
=== EVIDENCE ===
figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/analysis.md:24-30→family: listlayout: list-numbered-4axis: verticalrelation_type: parallelcardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4slots (5개, required 5개): title, item_1, item_2, item_3, item_4source title: 국외 BIM 수행 현황figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/texts.md→ confirms 4-item numbered list body (오류에 의한 Claim 최소화 / 설계 업무 Data 정리 / 자체 기술업무 Manual / 데이터 통합 및 관리). Source content matches strict:4 contract.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/index.htmlpresent (TrackA = index.html present + catalog absent).templates/phase_z2/families/overseas_bim_numbered_list.htmlabsent →visual_pending: truejustified.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlcross-section verification fortemplate_id: overseas_bim_numbered_list::414-428section 01-2 →confidence: 0.079,v4_full_rank: 27,label: reject,axes.cardinality: 0.0:766-780section 02-2.2 →confidence: 0.3053,v4_full_rank: 18,label: reject,axes.cardinality: 0.0(best non-holdout):1238-1252section 03-1 →confidence: 0.3008,v4_full_rank: 17,label: reject,axes.cardinality: 0.0:1815-1829section 03-2 →confidence: 0.1701,v4_full_rank: 23,label: reject,axes.cardinality: 0.0:2182-2196section 01-1 (holdout) →confidence: 0.5125,v4_full_rank: 15,label: reject,axes.cardinality: 0.0python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.18s.grep -c '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 19 (11 baseline + u3..u10 = 8).DO NOT commit or push.
[Codex #32] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u10 TrackA VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u10.
The new
overseas_bim_numbered_listcatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281174, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict four-item cardinality, carriestitleplusitem_1throughitem_4sub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholdersnumbered_list_four/numbered_label_body_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/index.htmlexists, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/overseas_bim_numbered_list.htmlis absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections:
02-2.2 rank 18, 0.3053,01-2 rank 27, 0.079,03-1 rank 17, 0.3008,03-2 rank 23, 0.1701, and holdout01-1 rank 15, 0.5125. A full section scan foroverseas_bim_numbered_listfound all 10 V4 judgments arelabel: reject; the main four sections havecardinality: 0.0, matching the Reason comment's cardinality-axis claim for the main sections.Unit boundary check: the verified u10 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u10 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^overseas_bim_numbered_list:|frame_id: 1171281174|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 4|numbered_list_four|numbered_label_body_item|item_4|Reason:|02-2\\.2 rank 18|01-2 rank 27|03-1 rank 17|03-2 rank 23|01-1 holdout rank 15' -Context 0,3Select-String -Path 'tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern 'template_id: overseas_bim_numbered_list|confidence: 0\\.3053|v4_full_rank: 18|confidence: 0\\.079|v4_full_rank: 27|confidence: 0\\.3008|v4_full_rank: 17|confidence: 0\\.1701|v4_full_rank: 23|confidence: 0\\.5125|v4_full_rank: 15|^ 02-2\\.2:|^ 01-2:|^ 03-1:|^ 03-2:|^ 01-1:' -Context 0,3Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/overseas_bim_numbered_list.html'; Select-String -Path 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/analysis.md' -Pattern 'cardinality|item_1|item_2|item_3|item_4|title' -Context 0,2git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamloverseas_bim_numbered_listacross all section blocks, extracting section, rank, confidence, label, and cardinality.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/overseas_bim_numbered_list.htmlTest results:
3 passed in 0.18sVerified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1071definesoverseas_bim_numbered_list.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1074usesframe_id: 1171281174.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1076setsvisual_pending: true.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1078usessource_shape: top_bullets.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1080setscardinality.strict: 4.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1083ordersitem_1throughitem_4.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1115-1117usesbuilder: numbered_list_fouranditem_parser: numbered_label_body_item.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/analysis.md:28-29statesideal 4 / min 4 / max 4and slotstitle, item_1, item_2, item_3, item_4.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281174/index.htmlexists.templates/phase_z2/families/overseas_bim_numbered_list.htmlis absent.overseas_bim_numbered_list:01-2rank 27 confidence 0.079 reject cardinality 0.0;02-2.2rank 18 confidence 0.3053 reject cardinality 0.0;03-1rank 17 confidence 0.3008 reject cardinality 0.0;03-2rank 23 confidence 0.1701 reject cardinality 0.0;01-1rank 15 confidence 0.5125 reject cardinality 0.0.02-1,02-2.1,04-1,04-2.1, and04-2.2.Remaining units: [u11, u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #33] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u11 TrackA VP F21 solution_engn_split_diagram (continue_same from Codex #32)
Executing unit: u11
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
■ diff_summary
solution_engn_split_diagram:appended afteroverseas_bim_numbered_list:(u10 anchor) at line 1120. 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved (CAT-only; no WIP/test/builder edits).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}) → source present (index.html confirmed; family partial absent → visual_pending justified)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →panel_section_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u11 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9/u10)template_id: solution_engn_split_diagram/frame_id: 1171281201/family: diagram/visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 3+overflow_policy: abort_or_reviewrole_order: [left_panel, right_panel, flow_labels]↔ analysis.md data slots (3 of 4 named slots; title excluded as header per peer convention)visual_hints.min_height_px: 350(peer parity vs u9/u10 350 + earlier 350 floor; visual-pending diagram family floor)accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 4 (matches analysis.md slot count 4 required 4 exactly):title(header strict 1,.f21b__title)left_panel(data strict 1,.f21b__panel--left)right_panel(data strict 1,.f21b__panel--right)flow_labels(data strict 1,.f21b__flow-labels)f21b__prefix (verified viatests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md:2311"Frame 21 / 1171281201" + ANCHOR_SETS_OVERVIEW.md:262; peer pattern f1b__ / f3b__ / f22b__ confirms frame_number-prefixed BEM)payload.builder: split_panel_diagram+builder_options.item_parser: panel_section_item— visual-pending placeholder builder/parser (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u11 scope)v4_full32_result.yaml:558-572):311-325):1045-1059):1742-1756):2521-2535):2079-2093); 02-2.1 rank 8, 0.1998 reject (:3053-3067); 04-1 rank 5, 0.4588 reject (:3495-3509); 04-2.1 rank 12, 0.5032 reject (:4087-4101); 04-2.2 rank 12, 0.5148 reject (:4574-4588)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py).solution_engn_split_diagram∈ catalog ∧visual_pending: true∧templates/phase_z2/families/solution_engn_split_diagram.htmlabsent (vp ∩ disk == ∅).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
=== EVIDENCE ===
Edit templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(single block append at line 1120) → diff stat1 file changed, 432 insertions(+)(note: stat includes prior accumulated u3..u10 lines from working tree; u11-specific delta = 47 lines new content vs previous tip).grep -c "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 20 (11 baseline + 9 added: u3..u11).grep -n "^solution_engn_split_diagram:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 1120 (positioned afteroverseas_bim_numbered_list:at 1071, peer adjacency preserved).ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/→analysis.md, analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak, assets, flat.md, index.html, texts.md(index.html present → source axis 2 satisfied).ls templates/phase_z2/families/solution_engn_split_diagram.html→ not found (family partial absent →visual_pending: truejustified).grep -n "template_id: solution_engn_split_diagram" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ 10 hits at lines 311, 558, 1045, 1742, 2079, 2521, 3053, 3495, 4087, 4574 (full 10-section coverage).grep -nE "^ [0-9].*:$" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ section bounds 01-2:19 / 02-2.2:506 / 03-1:993 / 03-2:1480 / 01-1:1967 / 02-1:2454 / 02-2.1:2941 / 04-1:3428 / 04-2.1:3915 / 04-2.2:4402 (section assignment for each V4 hit line verified).grep -E "Frame 21 / 1171281201" tests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md tests/matching/ANCHOR_SETS_OVERVIEW.md→ both confirm frame_number 21 → f21b__ prefix.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.19s(zero regression).DO NOT commit or push.
[Codex #34] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u11 TrackA VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u11.
The new
solution_engn_split_diagramcatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281201, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares a three-slot data cardinality matchingrole_order: [left_panel, right_panel, flow_labels], carriestitleplusleft_panel,right_panel, andflow_labelssub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholderssplit_panel_diagram/panel_section_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/index.htmlexists, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/solution_engn_split_diagram.htmlis absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections:
02-2.2 rank 4, 0.7394 restructure,01-2 rank 20, 0.2097 reject,03-1 rank 4, 0.6631 reject,03-2 rank 18, 0.2452 reject, and holdout02-1 rank 5, 0.724 restructure. A full section scan forsolution_engn_split_diagramfound 10 judgments total, with 7 rejects and 3 restructures; cardinality is non-zero in 7/10 sections, including0.8on main02-2.2and03-1, and0.0on main01-2and03-2, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u11 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u11 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^solution_engn_split_diagram:|frame_id: 1171281201|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 3|split_panel_diagram|panel_section_item|left_panel|right_panel|flow_labels|Reason:|02-2\\.2 rank|01-2 rank|03-1 rank|03-2 rank|01-1 holdout' -Context 0,3Select-String -Path 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/analysis.md' -Pattern 'cardinality|title|left_panel|right_panel|flow_labels|required|ideal|min|max' -Context 0,2Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/solution_engn_split_diagram.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2solution_engn_split_diagramacross all section blocks, extracting section, rank, confidence, label, cardinality, and source line.Select-String -Path 'tests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md' -Pattern '1171281201|Frame 21|solution_engn_split_diagram' -Context 0,2Select-String -Path 'tests/matching/ANCHOR_SETS_OVERVIEW.md' -Pattern '1171281201|Frame 21|solution_engn_split_diagram' -Context 0,2git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | Select-String -Pattern '^\\+solution_engn_split_diagram:|^\\+ # Reason|^\\+ template_id|^\\+ frame_id|^\\+ family|^\\+ visual_pending|^\\+ source_shape|^\\+ strict: 3|^\\+ role_order|^\\+ min_height_px|^\\+ - id: title|^\\+ - id: left_panel|^\\+ - id: right_panel|^\\+ - id: flow_labels|^\\+ builder:|^\\+ item_parser:' -Context 0,1python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/solution_engn_split_diagram.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pytests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.mdtests/matching/ANCHOR_SETS_OVERVIEW.mdTest results:
3 passed in 0.30sVerified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1120definessolution_engn_split_diagram.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1123points toframe_id: 1171281201.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1125keepsvisual_pending: true.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1127usessource_shape: top_bullets, which is allowed bysrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:98-104.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1129declaresstrict: 3, andtemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1132has three data roles:left_panel,right_panel, andflow_labels.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/analysis.md:26-27reportscardinality: ideal 4 / min 3 / max 5and slotstitle, left_panel, right_panel, flow_labels.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281201/index.htmlexists.templates/phase_z2/families/solution_engn_split_diagram.htmlis absent.solution_engn_split_diagram:01-2 rank=20 confidence=0.2097 label=reject cardinality=0.0;02-2.2 rank=4 confidence=0.7394 label=restructure cardinality=0.8;03-1 rank=4 confidence=0.6631 label=reject cardinality=0.8;03-2 rank=18 confidence=0.2452 label=reject cardinality=0.0;01-1 rank=8 confidence=0.6865 label=restructure cardinality=0.8;02-1 rank=5 confidence=0.724 label=restructure cardinality=0.8;02-2.1 rank=8 confidence=0.1998 label=reject cardinality=0.0;04-1 rank=5 confidence=0.4588 label=reject cardinality=0.8;04-2.1 rank=12 confidence=0.5032 label=reject cardinality=1.0;04-2.2 rank=12 confidence=0.5148 label=reject cardinality=1.0.tests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md:2311andtests/matching/ANCHOR_SETS_OVERVIEW.md:262identify Frame 21 /1171281201.Remaining units: [u12, u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #35] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u12 TrackB VP contract-first F2 engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge (continue_same from Codex #34)
Executing unit: u12
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
solution_engn_split_diagram:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge:appended aftersolution_engn_split_diagram:(u11 anchor) at line 1167. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-Pathcheck INDEX_ABSENT)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →pillar_label_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u12 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11; visual_pending = render harness target absent)template_id: engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge/frame_id: 1171281173/family: cards(analysis.md line 25**family**: cards) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 4+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md line 29cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4→ strict 4 = pillar data axis (4 numbered pillar labels, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity with u9 (six_nodes strict:6) / u10 (numbered_list strict:4).role_order: [pillar_1, pillar_2, pillar_3, pillar_4]— data axis = the 4 pillar labels per analysis.md slots (excludes title / center_message / description = non-data-axis singleton slots).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 (350 visual-pending floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 7 (matches analysis.md "slots (7개, required 6개)" exactly):title(header strict 1,.f2b__title)pillar_1..pillar_4(data strict 1 each,.f2b__pillar--{N}) — 4 numbered pillar labelscenter_message(header strict 1,.f2b__center-message) — central emphasis text (analysis.md "중앙 강조 메시지")description(footer{ min: 0, max: 1 },.f2b__description) — analysis.md "slots 7 required 6" → description = 1 optional slot (footer 하단 설명 텍스트); precedent:{ min: 0, max: 1 }OPTIONAL pattern at frame_contracts.yaml line 305 (Codex F1-a 정정 anchor)f2b__prefix (peer pattern verified: u9f1b__/ u10f3b__/ u11f21b__— frame_number-prefixed BEM; additional baselinesf11b__/f12b__/f13b__/f14b__/f16b__/f18b__/f29b__all follow same convention)payload.builder: pillar_cards_four_plus_center+builder_options.item_parser: pillar_label_item— visual-pending placeholder builder/parser (new mapper wire = separate IMP per Stage 1 guardrail).tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py).engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge∈ catalog ∧visual_pending: true∧templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.htmlabsent (vp ∩ disk == ∅).yaml.safe_loadparses 21 top-level keys cleanly; engn_sw entry exposes all 11 fields template_id / frame_id / family / visual_pending / source_shape / cardinality / role_order / visual_hints / accepted_content_types / sub_zones / payload).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
grep -E "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 21 top-level keys (was 20 pre-u12).grep -oE "template_id: [a-z_]+" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml | sort -u | wc -l→ 32 unique template_ids (V4 evidence universe).grep -B1 "template_id:" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ frame_id ↔ template_id ↔ frame_number mapping confirms1171281173 / frame_number 2 / engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.for d in figma_to_html_agent/blocks/*/; do ... if [ ! -f "$d/index.html" ]; ...→ 12 TrackB block dirs lacking index.html (matches Stage 1 evidenceblock_dirs_lacking_index_html: 12; 1171281171 non-target excluded).awkV4 section scan forengn_sw_development_domain_knowledgeacross all 10 section blocks, extracting confidence / label / cardinality / v4_full_rank per section.test -f templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.html→ ABSENT (VP justified).test -f figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/index.html→ INDEX_ABSENT (TrackB confirmed).python -c "import yaml; d=yaml.safe_load(open('templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml','r',encoding='utf-8')); print(len(d))"→ 21 keys, engn_sw entry parses cleanly with all 11 fields.git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ CAT-only diff (1 file changed, 491 insertions across u3..u12 working-tree accumulation; u12 itself = +57 lines block).git diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | grep "^+" | grep -c "engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge\|f2b__\|pillar_cards_four_plus_center\|pillar_label_item\|1171281173"→ 13 u12-specific lines confirmed.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.22s.Files checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(u11 anchor + new u12 block)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/analysis.md(structure authority: family cards / cardinality ideal 4 / slots 7 required 6)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/texts.md(text inventory cross-check — 4 pillar labels + center messages + description bar)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml(10-section V4 trace for engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104(split_source enum allow-list: top_bullets, h3_subsections)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265(ITEM_PARSERS — new pillar_label_item wire deferred to separate IMP)scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543(argparse — render-to deferred, visual_pending)Test results:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→ 3 passed in 0.22s, 0 regression vs HEAD.Verified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlnow containsengn_sw_development_domain_knowledge:as the 21st top-level contract (line 1167+).frame_id: 1171281173,family: cards,visual_pending: true,source_shape: top_bullets,cardinality.strict: 4+overflow_policy: abort_or_review,role_order: [pillar_1, pillar_2, pillar_3, pillar_4],visual_hints.min_height_px: 350,accepted_content_types: [text_block], 7 sub_zones (title + 4 pillars + center_message + description optional{ min: 0, max: 1 }), and payloadbuilder: pillar_cards_four_plus_center/item_parser: pillar_label_item.f2b__BEM prefix consistent with frame_number 2 (peer pattern verified against f1b/f3b/f21b u9/u10/u11 + baselines f11b/f12b/f13b/f14b/f16b/f18b/f29b).label: reject. Confidence ranges 0.0635 → 0.6537. Main 4 cardinality axis = 0.0 (rejection penalty fired). Best non-holdout = 03-1 rank 21, 0.1891. Holdout best = 04-2.2 rank 8, 0.6537.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/index.htmlABSENT (TrackB contract-first confirmed).templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.htmlABSENT (VP exemption justified).tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py) 3 passed in 0.22s; no regression.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; no commit / push performed per Stage 3 directive.Remaining units: [u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
DO NOT commit or push.
[Codex #36] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u12 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u12.
The new
engn_sw_development_domain_knowledgecatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281173, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict four-pillar cardinality, carriestitle,pillar_1throughpillar_4,center_message, and optionaldescriptionsub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholderspillar_cards_four_plus_center/pillar_label_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections:
03-1 rank 21, 0.1891,01-2 rank 21, 0.1755,02-2.2 rank 25, 0.1831,03-2 rank 28, 0.0635, and holdout04-2.2 rank 8, 0.6537. A full section scan forengn_sw_development_domain_knowledgefound 10 judgments total and all arelabel: reject; the main four sections all havecardinality: 0.0, matching the Reason comment's cardinality-axis claim.Unit boundary check: the verified u12 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u12 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge:|frame_id: 1171281173|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 4|pillar_label_item|bullet_cards_four_center|center_message|description|Reason:' -Context 0,4Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/analysis.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2engn_sw_development_domain_knowledgeacross all section blocks, extracting section, rank, confidence, label, cardinality, and source line.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q->3 passed in 0.20sVerified facts:
engn_sw_development_domain_knowledgehastemplate_id: engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge,frame_id: 1171281173,family: cards,visual_pending: true, andsource_shape: top_bullets.cardinality.strict: 4matches the four-pillar data axis inanalysis.md(ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4) androle_order: [pillar_1, pillar_2, pillar_3, pillar_4].title,pillar_1,pillar_2,pillar_3,pillar_4,center_message, and optionaldescription, matchinganalysis.mdslots 7 / required 6.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281173/index.htmlis absent.templates/phase_z2/families/engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge.htmlis absent, so the visual-pending exemption is valid.reject; main01-2,02-2.2,03-1, and03-2cardinality axes are all0.0.Remaining units: [u13, u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #37] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u13 TrackB VP contract-first F4 domestic_bim_actor_relations (continue_same from Codex #36)
Executing unit: u13
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
domestic_bim_actor_relations:appended afterengn_sw_development_domain_knowledge:(u12 anchor) at line 1223. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →actor_label_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u13 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12; visual_pending = render harness target absent)template_id: domestic_bim_actor_relations/frame_id: 1171281175/family: diagram(analysis.md line 24**family**: diagram) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 4+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md line 28cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4→ strict 4 = 4-actor data axis (4 BIM 수행 주체 라벨, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity with u9 (six_nodes strict:6) / u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u12 (pillar strict:4).role_order: [actor_1, actor_2, actor_3, actor_4]— data axis = the 4 actor labels per analysis.md slots (excludes title header + relations optional annotation overlay).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 (350 visual-pending diagram/cards/list family floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 6 (matches analysis.md "slots (6개, required 5개)" exactly):title(header strict 1,.f4b__title)actor_1..actor_4(data strict 1 each,.f4b__actor--{N}) — 4 BIM 수행 주체 라벨 (건설관리사 / 설계사 / 시공사 / 정부기관·발주처)relations(footer{ min: 0, max: 1 },.f4b__relations) — analysis.md "slots 6 required 5" → relations = 1 optional slot (지침·규정·기술형식 연결선 annotation overlay per analysis 라벨과 연결선)f4b__BEM prefix (verified viatests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md:216"Frame 4 / 1171281175"; peer pattern f1b__ / f2b__ / f3b__ / f21b__ confirms frame_number-prefixed BEM)payload.builder: quadrilateral_actor_relations+builder_options.item_parser: actor_label_item— visual-pending placeholder builder/parser (NOT wired to runtime; new mapper wire = separate IMP per Stage 2 plan unit_size guardrail)v4_full32_result.yaml:159-173):781-795):1433-1448):1710-1724):4040-4054):4542-4556)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py).domestic_bim_actor_relations∈ catalog ∧visual_pending: true∧templates/phase_z2/families/domestic_bim_actor_relations.htmlabsent (vp ∩ disk == ∅).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
=== EVIDENCE ===
grep -c "^[a-z][a-z_0-9]*:$" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 22 (was 21 after u12).grep -c "visual_pending: true" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 9 (was 8 after u12; u13 adds 1 VP entry).wc -l templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 1274 (was 1220 after u12; u13 added 54 lines).grep -n "^domestic_bim_actor_relations:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ line 1223 (anchor confirmed).figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/directory listing →analysis.md, analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak, texts.md(NO index.html → TrackB contract-first confirmed).figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/analysis.md:**family**: diagram(matches contractfamily: diagram)**layout**: quadrilateral-relations(informs builder namequadrilateral_actor_relations)**relation_type**: hierarchy**cardinality**: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4(informscardinality.strict: 4)**slots** (6개, required 5개): title, actor_1, actor_2, actor_3, actor_4, relations(informs sub_zones 6 entries: 1 header + 4 data + 1 optional footer)tests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md:216→### Frame 4 / 1171281175 (total_unique 45)(confirms frame_number 4 →f4b__BEM prefix per peer pattern f1b__/f2b__/f3b__/f21b__).domestic_bim_actor_relations(10 cites at lines 161/783/1435/1712/2349/2851/3353/3690/4042/4544):python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.30s.Test-Path templates/phase_z2/families/domestic_bim_actor_relations.html→ False (visual_pending justified — Phase Z family partial absent).git diff --stat templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ cumulative545 ++++++++++++++++++++++++(covers u3..u13 uncommitted changes since HEAD 73a98b8; u13 alone = +54 lines perwc -ldelta 1220→1274).DO NOT commit or push. The Gitea comment IS the deliverable.
[Codex #38] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u13 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u13.
The new
domestic_bim_actor_relationscatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281175, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict four-actor cardinality, carriestitle,actor_1throughactor_4, and optionalrelationssub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholdersquadrilateral_actor_relations/actor_label_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/domestic_bim_actor_relations.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections:
01-2 rank 10, 0.5096 reject,02-2.2 rank 19, 0.2512 reject,03-1 rank 30, 0.0253 rejectwithpenalty: 0.2,03-2 rank 16, 0.279 reject, holdout04-2.1 rank 9, 0.6016 restructure, and04-2.2 rank 10, 0.5787 reject. A full section scan fordomestic_bim_actor_relationsfound 10 judgments total, with 9 rejects and 1 restructure; the main four sections all havecardinality: 0.0, while the cited holdout04-2.1and04-2.2judgments havecardinality: 1.0, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u13 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u13 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^domestic_bim_actor_relations:|frame_id: 1171281175|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 4|quadrilateral_relations|actor_label_item|actor_1|actor_2|actor_3|actor_4|relations|Reason:' -Context 0,4Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/analysis.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/domestic_bim_actor_relations.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2domestic_bim_actor_relationsacross all section blocks, extracting section, rank, confidence, label, cardinality, and penalty.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qgit diff -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/domestic_bim_actor_relations.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyTest results:
3 passed in 0.27sVerified facts:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1223definesdomestic_bim_actor_relations.frame_id: 1171281175, setsvisual_pending: true, usessource_shape: top_bullets, and declarescardinality.strict: 4.role_order: [actor_1, actor_2, actor_3, actor_4], sub-zones fortitle,actor_1throughactor_4, and optionalrelations, and payload builder/parserquadrilateral_actor_relations/actor_label_item.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/analysis.mddeclares familydiagram, layoutquadrilateral-relations, cardinalityideal 4 / min 4 / max 4, and slotstitle, actor_1, actor_2, actor_3, actor_4, relationswith 6 slots / 5 required.figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281175/index.htmlis absent.templates/phase_z2/families/domestic_bim_actor_relations.htmlis absent.domestic_bim_actor_relations:01-2|10|0.5096|reject|0.0|0.0,02-2.2|19|0.2512|reject|0.0|0.0,03-1|30|0.0253|reject|0.0|0.2,03-2|16|0.279|reject|0.0|0.0,01-1|26|0.312|reject|0.0|0.0,02-1|27|0.2266|reject|0.0|0.0,02-2.1|28|0.0|reject|0.0|0.2,04-1|18|0.2794|reject|0.0|0.0,04-2.1|9|0.6016|restructure|1.0|0.0,04-2.2|10|0.5787|reject|1.0|0.0.Remaining units: [u14, u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #39] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u14 TrackB VP contract-first F5 compensation_complaint_side_card (continue_same from Codex #38)
Executing unit: u14
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
domestic_bim_actor_relations:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
compensation_complaint_side_card:appended afterdomestic_bim_actor_relations:(u13 anchor) at line 1277. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →side_card_list_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u14 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13; visual_pending = render harness target absent)template_id: compensation_complaint_side_card/frame_id: 1171281176/family: cards(analysis.md line 25**family**: cards) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 3+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md line 29cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 5→ strict 3 = declared data slot count (item_1..item_3 = 3) and min cardinality. Peer parity with u11 (solution_engn_split_diagram strict:3 with ideal 4 / min 3 / max 5 — ideal/min/max divergence convention: strict matches data-axis count and min). max 5 = frame design 가용 범위 (declared slots only 3; overflow_policy 처리). u9 (six_nodes strict:6) / u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u12 (pillar strict:4) / u13 (actor strict:4) all used strict where ideal=min=max; u11 and u14 share the strict=min convention when ideal/min/max diverge.role_order: [item_1, item_2, item_3]— data axis = the 3 list items per analysis.md slots (excludes title header).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 (350 visual-pending cards/diagram/list family floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 4 (matches analysis.md "slots (4개, required 4개)" exactly):title(header strict 1,.f5b__title)item_1/item_2/item_3(data strict 1 each,.f5b__item--{N}) — 3 list items per analysis.md (시각화 도구 나열)f5b__prefix (verified viatests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md:312"Frame 5 / 1171281176"; peer pattern f1b__ / f2b__ / f3b__ / f4b__ / f21b__ confirms frame_number-prefixed BEM convention)payload.builder: side_card_with_list_three+builder_options.item_parser: side_card_list_item— visual-pending placeholder builder/parser (new mapper wire = 별 IMP, NOT in u14 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no AI per-frame call / no calculate_fit migration / no production refactor for tests")v4_full32_result.yaml:446-458, cardinality 0.5):663-675, cardinality 1.0) — best non-holdout:1210-1222, cardinality 1.0):1847-1859, cardinality 0.5):2094-2106, cardinality 1.0) — best by confidence:2566-2578, cardinality 1.0):3368-3380, cardinality 0.5):3480-3492, cardinality 0.8) — best by rank:4072-4084, cardinality 0.8):4559-4571, cardinality 0.8)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py).compensation_complaint_side_card∈ catalog ∧visual_pending: true∧templates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_side_card.htmlabsent (vp ∩ disk == ∅).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
=== EVIDENCE ===
awk '/^[a-z_][a-z_0-9]*:[[:space:]]*$/{print NR": "$0}' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | tail -5→ confirms new entry at line 1277:git diff --stat templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ only CAT changed.Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/index.html'→ False (TrackB INDEX_ABSENT).Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_side_card.html'→ False (Phase Z family partial absent — visual_pending justified).figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/analysis.md:25-32→tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml10-judgment scan for compensation_complaint_side_card:tests/matching/anchor_candidates_report.md:312→ "### Frame 5 / 1171281176 (total_unique 21)" — confirms frame_number 5 →f5b__BEM prefix.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.30s.DO NOT commit or push. Gitea comment is the deliverable.
[Codex #40] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u14 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u14.
The new
compensation_complaint_side_cardcatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281176, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict three-item cardinality, carriestitleplusitem_1throughitem_3sub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholdersside_card_with_list_three/side_card_list_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_side_card.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections:
02-2.2 rank 11, 0.5231,01-2 rank 29, 0.0707,03-1 rank 15, 0.4277,03-2 rank 25, 0.121, holdout best by confidence01-1 rank 9, 0.6574, and holdout best by rank04-1 rank 4, 0.5946. A full section scan forcompensation_complaint_side_cardfound 10 judgments total and all arelabel: reject; the main four cardinality values are0.5 / 1.0 / 1.0 / 0.5, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u14 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u14 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^compensation_complaint_side_card:|frame_id: 1171281176|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 3|side_card|side_card_list_item|item_1|item_2|item_3|Reason:' -Context 0,5Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/analysis.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/texts.md'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_side_card.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2compensation_complaint_side_cardacross all section blocks, extracting section, rank, confidence, label, penalty, and cardinality.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281176/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_side_card.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 3 passed in 0.29s.Remaining units: [u15, u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #41] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u15 TrackB VP contract-first F6 compensation_complaint_map (continue_same from Codex #40)
Executing unit: u15
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
compensation_complaint_side_card:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
compensation_complaint_map:appended aftercompensation_complaint_side_card:(u14 anchor) starting at line 1320. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT)src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →map_area_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u15 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14; visual_pending = render harness target absent)template_id: compensation_complaint_map/frame_id: 1171281177/family: map(analysis.md line 24**family**: map) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 1+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md line 28cardinality: ideal 1 / min 1 / max 1→ strict 1 = single map_area data slot (full-page map 단일 시각화, 가변 항목 없음). New strict-singleton convention for u15 (first family=map entry in catalog); peer comparators u9 (six_nodes strict:6) / u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u11 (split_diagram strict:3) / u12 (pillar strict:4) / u13 (actor strict:4) / u14 (side_card strict:3) all used strict ≥ 3; u15 strict:1 reflects map-family single-data-region nature.role_order: [map_area]— data axis = the 1 map area per analysis.md slots (excludes banner_title header per peer convention u9..u14: header slot excluded from role_order).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 (350 visual-pending family floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 2 (matches analysis.md "slots (2개, required 2개)" exactly):banner_title(header strict 1,.f6b__banner-title) — analysis.md slot idbanner_title(literal preserved, not normalized totitlesince analysis.md usesbanner_title)map_area(data strict 1,.f6b__map-area) — full-page 위치 기반 시공 리스크 맵 시각화 영역f6b__prefix (verified via v4_full32_result.yamlframe_number: 6at line 254 / 951 / etc.; peer pattern f5b__ (u14 frame_number 5) / f4b__ (u13 frame_number 4) / f3b__ (u10 frame_number 3) / f2b__ (u12 frame_number 2) / f1b__ frame_number 1 confirms frame_number-prefixed BEM convention)payload.builder: full_page_map_banner+builder_options.item_parser: map_area_item— visual-pending placeholder builder/parser (new mapper wire = 별 IMP, NOT in u15 scope per Stage 1 guardrail)v4_full32_result.yaml:251-265):948-962):1450-1464):1802-1816):2948-2962) — highest of 10 sections but still reject (< 0.60 threshold):2379-2393); holdout 02-1 rank 29, 0.1977 reject (:2881-2895); holdout 04-1 rank 22, 0.1929 reject (:3750-3764); holdout 04-2.1 rank 19, 0.1984 reject (:4192-4206); holdout 04-2.2 rank 20, 0.1949 reject (:4694-4708)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py).compensation_complaint_map∈ catalog ∧visual_pending: true∧templates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_map.htmlabsent (vp ∩ disk == ∅).app_sw_package_vs_solutionu3 +pre_construction_model_info_stackedu4 +engn_sw_three_typesu5 +bim_adoption_central_splitu6 +bigroom_system_componentsu7 +model_specialized_engn_swu8 +sw_development_cycle_six_nodesu9 +overseas_bim_numbered_listu10 +solution_engn_split_diagramu11 +engn_sw_development_domain_knowledgeu12 +domestic_bim_actor_relationsu13 +compensation_complaint_side_cardu14 +compensation_complaint_mapu15). Remaining to reach 32/32 = 8 (u16..u23 contracts + u24 gate).figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/index.htmlENOENT). TrackB contract-first sequence: u12 (F2) → u13 (F4) → u14 (F5) → u15 (F6) — frame_id ascending order preserved (skipping TrackA F3=1171281174 u10 already in catalog).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
full_page_map_banner/map_area_itemjoins priorpillar_cards_four_plus_center/pillar_label_item/quadrilateral_actor_relations/actor_label_item/side_card_with_list_three/side_card_list_item/numbered_list_four/numbered_label_body_item/split_panel_diagram/panel_section_item/circular_nodes_six/node_label_item) — separate IMP.[Codex #42] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u15 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u15.
The new
compensation_complaint_mapcatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281177, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict singleton map-area cardinality, carriesbanner_titleandmap_areasub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholdersfull_page_map_banner/map_area_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_map.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: map,layout: full-page-map-banner,cardinality: ideal 1 / min 1 / max 1, and two required slotsbanner_titleplusmap_area. The data-axis convention used in recent visual-pending entries makesstrict: 1androle_order: [map_area]consistent: the banner title is a fixed header slot, while the single map area is the variable data slot.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 16, 0.3429,02-2.2 rank 30, 0.0749withbase 0.2749andpenalty 0.2,03-1 rank 31, 0.0withbase 0.1937andpenalty 0.2,03-2 rank 22, 0.1867, holdout best by confidence02-2.1 rank 1, 0.544 rejectwithcardinality 1.0, and holdout01-1 rank 28, 0.2216 reject. A full section scan forcompensation_complaint_mapfound 10 judgments total, alllabel: reject; the main four cardinality values are0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u15 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u15 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^compensation_complaint_map:|frame_id: 1171281177|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 1|map_area|banner_title|full_page_map_banner|map_area_item|Reason:' -Context 0,6Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/analysis.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/texts.md'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_map.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2rg -n -C 8 "template_id: compensation_complaint_map|v4_full_rank:|confidence:|label:|cardinality:|penalty:" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlcompensation_complaint_mapacross all section blocks, extracting section, rank, confidence, base, penalty, label, cardinality, and holdout status.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qGet-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Tail 70Files checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281177/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/compensation_complaint_map.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 3 passed in 0.32sRemaining units: [u16, u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #43] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u16 TrackB VP contract-first F10 field_effectiveness_five_elements (continue_same from Codex #42)
Executing unit: u16
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
compensation_complaint_map:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
field_effectiveness_five_elements:appended aftercompensation_complaint_map:(u15 anchor) starting at line 1356. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 24 → 25 (8 TrackB VP units remain to reach 32/32 + WIP==0 at u24 gate).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →radial_element_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u16 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: field_effectiveness_five_elements/frame_id: 1171281181/family: diagram(analysis.md L23**family**: diagram) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 5+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L27cardinality: ideal 5 / min 5 / max 5→ strict 5 = 5-element radial data axis (가변 항목 없음). Peer parity with u9 (six_nodes strict:6) / u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u12 (pillar strict:4) / u13 (actor strict:4) where ideal=min=max convention. element_3 center-emphasis (texts.md L16 "항목3 (중앙 강조) 현장 맞춤형 Solution") = 시각적 강조이며 구조 슬롯 평탄(데이터 슬롯 수는 5 유지) — flat data axis, no nested center slot.role_order: [element_1, element_2, element_3, element_4, element_5]— data axis = the 5 radial element labels per analysis.md slots (excludes title header per peer convention u9..u15: header slot excluded from role_order).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 (350 visual-pending diagram/cards/list/map family floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 6 (matches analysis.md L28 "slots (6개, required 6개)" exactly):title(header strict 1,.f10b__title)element_1..element_5(data strict 1 each,.f10b__element--{N}) — 5 radial element labels (1: 디지털 정보물 관리 / 2: S/W 종속성 해소 / 3: 현장 맞춤형 Solution (center-emphasis) / 4: 일반PC 사용 가능 / 5: 직관적 정보 이해/활용 per texts.md L10-24)f10b__prefix (peer pattern f1b__ / f3b__ / f21b__ / f17b__ / f18b__ confirms frame_number-prefixed BEM; verified via existing entriespartial_target_pathgrep)payload.builder: radial_diagram_five+builder_options.item_parser: radial_element_item— visual-pending placeholders, new mapper wire 별 IMP (Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests" 준수). Peer family parity: u9circular_nodes_six(diagram-6-circular) / u11split_panel_diagram(diagram-3-split-panel) / u13quadrilateral_actor_relations(diagram-4-quadrilateral). u16radial_diagram_five(diagram-5-radial) = new diagram sub-family — 5 radial element placement with center-emphasis support.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml):index.html미작성 (TrackB contract-first per Stage 2 plan) + Phase Z family partialtemplates/phase_z2/families/field_effectiveness_five_elements.html미작성 (verified viaTest-Path).■ remaining_units
policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements)design_method_distortion_three_col)commercial_sw_four_categories)sw_dependency_four_problems)industry_current_status_three_col)industry_characteristics_three_col)policy_achievement_five_goals)■ follow_up_issue_candidates
radial_diagram_five/radial_element_itemjoiningcircular_nodes_six/node_label_item/numbered_list_four/numbered_label_body_item/split_panel_diagram/panel_section_item/pillar_cards_four_plus_center/pillar_label_item/quadrilateral_actor_relations/actor_label_item/side_card_with_list_three/side_card_list_item/full_page_map_banner/map_area_item) = deferred to separate IMP per Stage 1 guardrail. Family partial HTML creation for all u9–u16 VP frames (TrackA index.html → Phase Z partial port + TrackB net-new partial authoring) = deferred (all units remainvisual_pending: true). u11 strict/ideal divergence convention (data-axis count excluding title header when analysis.md ideal includes header slot) and u15 strict-singleton (family=map) convention noted in prior turns; u16 returns to peer parity strict=ideal=min=max convention (no divergence — analysis.md ideal 5 / min 5 / max 5).DO NOT commit or push. The Gitea comment IS the deliverable. Working tree carries earlier IMP-04b accumulated unit changes (u3–u15 CAT/WIP/BT edits + u16 CAT add) plus pre-existing unrelated working-tree drift, per mid-stage compaction note — not addressed in this thread.
Baseline test (
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py): 3 passed in 0.33s (regression 0; VP-exempt invariantcontracts == (disk - wip) ∪ vpholds with u16 added;vp ∩ disk == ∅preserved — u16 family partial absent).Evidence:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^field_effectiveness_five_elements:|frame_id: 1171281181|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 5|radial_diagram_five|radial_element_item|element_1|element_2|element_3|element_4|element_5|Reason:'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/index.html'→ False (TrackB confirmed)Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/field_effectiveness_five_elements.html'→ False (visual_pending justified)field_effectiveness_five_elementsacrosstests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ 10 judgments / 10 reject; main 4 cardinality 0.0; holdout 04-1 rank 2 cardinality 1.0python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.33sgit diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(working-tree cumulative across u3–u16 unit edits, per mid-stage compaction)[Codex #44] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u16 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u16.
The new
field_effectiveness_five_elementscatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281181, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict five-element cardinality, carriestitlepluselement_1throughelement_5sub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholdersradial_diagram_five/radial_element_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/field_effectiveness_five_elements.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: diagram,layout: radial-diagram-5,cardinality: ideal 5 / min 5 / max 5, and six required slotstitlepluselement_1throughelement_5. Thetexts.mdfile has five body items, with item 3 marked as center-emphasis; treating that as visual emphasis rather than a separate nested schema keeps the data axis at five slots.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
02-2.2 rank 26, 0.18withbase 0.38andpenalty 0.2,01-2 rank 30, 0.0707withbase 0.2707andpenalty 0.2,03-1 rank 22, 0.1881withbase 0.3881andpenalty 0.2,03-2 rank 31, 0.0454withbase 0.2454andpenalty 0.2, holdout best by rank04-1 rank 2, 0.6453 rejectwithcardinality 1.0, and holdout01-1 rank 22, 0.3844 reject. A full section scan forfield_effectiveness_five_elementsfound 10 judgments total and all arelabel: reject; the main four cardinality values are0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u16 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u16 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^field_effectiveness_five_elements:|frame_id: 1171281181|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 5|element_1|element_2|element_3|element_4|element_5|radial_diagram_five|radial_element_item|Reason:' -Context 0,8Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/field_effectiveness_five_elements.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2field_effectiveness_five_elementsacross all section blocks, extracting section, holdout flag, rank, confidence, base, penalty, label, and cardinality.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281181/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/field_effectiveness_five_elements.htmlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pytests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyTest results:
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q->3 passed in 0.32sRemaining units: [u17, u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #45] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u17 TrackB VP contract-first F15 policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements (continue_same from Codex #44)
Executing unit: u17
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
field_effectiveness_five_elements:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements:appended afterfield_effectiveness_five_elements:(u16 anchor) starting at line 1409. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 25 → 26 (6 TrackB VP units remain to reach 32/32 + WIP==0 at u24 gate).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →goal_label_body_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u17 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements/frame_id: 1171281192/family: cards(analysis.md L24**family**: cards) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 4+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L28cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4→ strict 4 = 4 정책목표 data axis (국가 신 성장 동력 재도약 / 공기·공사비 30% 절감 / 안전사고 40% 감소 / 고부가가치 산업전환). Peer parity with u9 (six_nodes strict:6) / u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u12 (pillar strict:4) / u13 (actor strict:4) / u16 (radial five strict:5) where ideal=min=max convention.role_order: [goal_1, goal_2, goal_3, goal_4]— data axis = 4 정책목표 (excludes title header + requirements_block footer per peer convention u9..u16: header/footer slots excluded from role_order).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 (350 visual-pending cards/diagram/list family floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 6 (composite goal_N convention per F16bim_issues_quadrant_fourprecedent — analysis.md L29 lists granular label/body slots (goal_1_label, goal_1_body, ..., goal_4_body), but Frame Slot unit = composite goal_N; label/body 평탄 = builder/parser internal payload per F16label_key_pattern: "quadrant_{n}_label"/body_key_pattern: "quadrant_{n}_body"precedent at lines 176-177; deferred to mapper IMP):title(header strict 1,.f15b__title)goal_1..goal_4(data strict 1 each,.f15b__goal--{N}) — 4 정책목표 composite (label + body 평탄 in builder layer)requirements_block(footer{ min: 0, max: 1 },.f15b__requirements) — analysis.md "slots 10 required 9" → requirements_block = 1 optional footer composite (5 실행요건 nested list per texts.md L28-58: Digital기술 능력 / 혁신적 사고 / 사용자 중심 / 분야별 전문 지식 / 지속적 투자); peer parity with u12 description (footer min:0/max:1) / u13 relations (footer min:0/max:1).payload.title.source: section.title(peer parity with u9..u16)payload.builder: policy_4card_plus_list/payload.builder_options.item_parser: goal_label_body_item— placeholder builder + parser name (new mapper wire별 IMP per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests"). Peer parity with u9 (circular_nodes_six+node_label_item) / u10 (numbered_list_four+numbered_label_body_item) / u12 (pillar_cards_four_plus_center+pillar_label_item) / u13 (quadrilateral_actor_relations+actor_label_item) / u16 (radial_diagram_five+radial_element_item) — visual_pending placeholder convention.■ Stage 1 guardrails verified (re-check on u17 boundary)
calculate_fitmigration touched (search confirmed — single-file diff)■ BT regression check (post-u17 boundary)
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→3 passed in 0.32s(regression 0; peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16)■ remaining_units (Stage 2 plan minus units already executed)
■ follow_up_issue_candidates (scope-lock 외 axis 발견)
numbered_list_four,panel_section_item,pillar_label_item,actor_label_item,side_card_list_item,map_area_item,radial_element_item,goal_label_body_item, etc.) deferred to separate IMP — explicit cross-issue scope-lock recommended after u24 gate close.templates/phase_z2/families/<template_id>.html) deferred for all visual_pending entries — separate IMP recommended (likely IMP-04c).■ Evidence
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:1409u17 entry insertion confirmed (grep -n "^policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 1409:policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements:)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/analysis.mdL24 family / L28 cardinality / L29 slots verified (Read tool full content)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/texts.mdL11-58 4 정책목표 카드 + 5 실행요건 카드 verified (Read tool full content)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/index.htmlabsent (Bash[ ! -f ... ]INDEX_ABSENT — TrackB confirmed)templates/phase_z2/families/policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements.htmlabsent (Bash glob check INDEX_ABSENT — family partial 미작성 confirmed)tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlper-section judgments extracted via Python YAML section iteration (10 sections; all RJ; main 4 cardinality 0.0)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyBT regression = 0 (3 passed in 0.32s post-u17)git diff --stat templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlshows cumulative +731 lines across u9-u17 IMP-04b accumulated changes (working tree carries earlier units; expected per compaction summary)grep -c "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml= 26 confirmed viagrep -n "^[a-z][a-z_]*:" ... | wc -l)STOP per Stage 3 1-unit-per-turn rule. No commit / no push (Stage 5 boundary). Gitea comment is the deliverable.
[Codex #46] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u17 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u17.
The new
policy_goals_plus_execution_requirementscatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281192, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict four-goal cardinality, carriestitle,goal_1throughgoal_4, andrequirements_blocksub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholderspolicy_4card_plus_list/goal_label_body_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: cards,layout: policy-4card-plus-list,cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4, and ten slots with nine required. The compositegoal_Nconvention is consistent with the recent visual-pending entries: the data axis is the four policy-goal cards, while the title is a fixed header andrequirements_blockis an optional footer composite.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 17, 0.2649, main02-2.2 rank 23, 0.2056withbase 0.4056andpenalty 0.2, main03-1 rank 18, 0.2359withbase 0.4359andpenalty 0.2, main03-2 rank 17, 0.2469, holdout04-2.1 rank 5, 0.6429 rejectwithcardinality 1.0, and holdout04-2.2 rank 9, 0.6427 rejectwithcardinality 1.0. A full occurrence scan forpolicy_goals_plus_execution_requirementsfound 10 judgments, alllabel: reject; the main four cardinality values are0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u17 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u17 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements:|frame_id: 1171281192|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 4|goal_1|goal_2|goal_3|goal_4|requirements_block|policy_goal_cards_four_plus_requirements|goal_label_body_item|Reason:' -Context 0,10Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortrg -n -B 8 -A 12 "template_id: policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2Select-String -Path 'scripts/smoke_frame_render.py' -Pattern 'template_id|render-to|argparse|add_argument' -Context 1,2(Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*:' | Measure-Object).Countpytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/texts.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281192/index.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements.htmltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py-> 3 passed in 0.33sRemaining units: [u18, u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #47] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u18 TrackB VP contract-first F12 design_method_distortion_three_col (continue_same from Codex #46)
Executing unit: u18
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
design_method_distortion_three_col:appended afterpolicy_goals_plus_execution_requirements:(u17 anchor) starting at line 1463. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 26 → 27 (5 TrackB VP units remain to reach 32/32 + WIP==0 at u24 gate).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →aspect_label_body_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u18 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: design_method_distortion_three_col/frame_id: 1171281197/family: compare(analysis.md L24**family**: compare) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 3+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L28cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 3→ strict 3 = 3 aspect data axis (건설산업 설계 특성 / 단순 작업 대체 / 저부가가치 산업전략, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity with u9 (six_nodes strict:6) / u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u12 (pillar strict:4) / u13 (actor strict:4) / u16 (radial five strict:5) / u17 (policy_goals strict:4) where ideal=min=max convention.role_order: [aspect_1, aspect_2, aspect_3]— data axis = 3 aspect 카드 per analysis.md slots (excludes title header per peer convention u9..u17: header slot excluded from role_order).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17 (350 visual-pending compare/cards/diagram/list/map family floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 4 (matches analysis.md "slots 7개 required 7개" — title + 3 aspect, with aspect_N_label + aspect_N_body 평탄 = builder/parser 내부 per F16 precedent):title(header strict 1,.f19b__title)aspect_1..aspect_3(data strict 1 each,.f19b__aspect--{N}) — 3 aspect composite slots (label + body 평탄). per F16bim_issues_quadrant_fourprecedent (quadrant_1..4 = composite Frame Slot, label/body 는 payload key not separate Frame Slot)..f19b__*BEM prefix (consistent with u17.f15b__*for frame_number 15).payload.title: { source: section.title }(peer parity with u17 single-line title pattern)payload.builder: three_col_compare/payload.builder_options.item_parser: aspect_label_body_item— new mapper wire (별 IMP, NOT in u18 scope)■ V4 evidence (10 judgments, full scan via PyYAML extraction):
■ BT regression
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.34s (0 regression vs. baseline at u17 close).■ remaining_units
commercial_sw_four_categories1171281205,sw_dependency_four_problems1171281206,policy_achievement_five_goals1171281213,industry_characteristics_three_col1171281212,industry_current_status_three_col1171281211)_WIP_FILES.mdallowlist 0 + BT PASS)■ follow_up_issue_candidates
numbered_list_four,pillar_label_item,actor_label_item,side_card_list_item,map_area_item,radial_element_item,goal_label_body_item,aspect_label_body_item, plus u9circular_nodes_sixand u11panel_section_item) — separate IMP per Stage 1 "no production refactor for tests" guardrail.tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py,_WIP_FILES.md, prior unit catalog additions) carried forward across r1~r10 — to be addressed at u24 gate / Stage 4 commit boundary.■ guardrails honored
design_method_distortion_three_col); BT scope =tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py(3 collected, 3 passed).continue_same — 5 TrackB VP units (u19~u23) + u24 gate remain.
[Codex #48] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u18 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u18.
The new
design_method_distortion_three_colcatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281197, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict three-aspect cardinality, carriestitleplusaspect_1throughaspect_3sub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholdersthree_col_compare/aspect_label_body_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/design_method_distortion_three_col.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: compare,layout: cards-3-compare,cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 3, and seven required slots:titleplus label/body pairs for three aspects. Treating each label/body pair as one compositeaspect_NFrame Slot is consistent with the recent visual-pending composite-slot convention; builder/parser wiring remains deferred by the visual-pending placeholder.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 12, 0.4422, main02-2.2 rank 14, 0.4117withbase 0.6117andpenalty 0.2, main03-1 rank 9, 0.5975, main03-2 rank 11, 0.3754, and holdout02-1 rank 12, 0.5897 rejectas both best by rank and best by confidence among the cited holdout comparisons. A full occurrence scan fordesign_method_distortion_three_colfound 10 judgments, alllabel: reject; the main four cardinality values are0.0 / 1.0 / 1.0 / 0.0, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u18 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u18 files are required or implicated by this unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^design_method_distortion_three_col:|frame_id: 1171281197|visual_pending: true|source_shape: top_bullets|strict: 3|aspect_1|aspect_2|aspect_3|design_method_distortion_three_col|cards_3_compare|aspect_label_body_item|Reason:' -Context 0,12Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/design_method_distortion_three_col.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortrg -n -B 10 -A 16 "template_id: design_method_distortion_three_col" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104,src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265, andscripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543Select-String -Path 'tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern 'template_id: design_method_distortion_three_col' | Measure-Object | Select-Object -ExpandProperty CountSelect-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*:' | Measure-Object | Select-Object -ExpandProperty CountFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/texts.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyVerified facts:
figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281197/index.htmlis absent andtemplates/phase_z2/families/design_method_distortion_three_col.htmlis absent.design_method_distortion_three_coljudgments; all 10 shown occurrences arelabel: reject.source_shape: top_bullets, which is in the mapper allow-list;aspect_label_body_itemis not in currentITEM_PARSERS, matching the visual-pending deferred-wiring status.Remaining units: [u19, u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #49] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u19 TrackB VP contract-first F25 commercial_sw_four_categories (continue_same from Codex #48)
Executing unit: u19
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
design_method_distortion_three_col:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
commercial_sw_four_categories:appended afterdesign_method_distortion_three_col:(u18 anchor) starting at line 1507. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 27 → 28 (4 TrackB VP units remain to reach 32/32 + WIP==0 at u24 gate).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →category_label_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u19 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17 / u18; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: commercial_sw_four_categories/frame_id: 1171281205/family: cards(analysis.md L24**family**: cards) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 4+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L28cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4→ strict 4 = 4 category data axis (조사/계획/분석 / 해석 / 단가/공정 / Graphic, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity with u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u12 (pillar strict:4) / u13 (actor strict:4) / u17 (policy_goals strict:4) where ideal=min=max convention.role_order: [category_1, category_2, category_3, category_4]— data axis = 4 category 라벨 per analysis.md slots (excludes title header + logos_panel optional visual region per peer convention u9..u18: header/footer/visual slots excluded from role_order).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17 / u18 (350 visual-pending family floor).accepted_content_types: [text_block]sub_zones× 6 (matches analysis.md "slots (6개, required 5개)" exactly):title(header strict 1,.f25b__title)category_1..category_4(data strict 1 each,.f25b__category--N) — composite per F16 (bim_issues_quadrant_fourquadrant_1..4 precedent); analysis.md raw enumcategory_1_label / category_2_label / category_3_label / category_4_labelgranularity = builder/parser internal (별 IMP)logos_panel(visualmin: 0, max: 1,.f25b__logos) — analysis.md "required 5" indicates 1 optional slot; S/W 로고 이미지 패널 = asset-promotion target 별 IMPpayload.builder: left_categories_right_logos+payload.builder_options.item_parser: category_label_item— both new visual-pending placeholders (no mapper wire in u19 scope).family: cards, L25layout: left-categories-right-logos, L26axis: horizontal, L27relation: parallelcardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4slots (6개, required 5개): title, category_1_label, category_2_label, category_3_label, category_4_label, logos_paneltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml) — 10 judgments total, alllabel: reject:■ guardrails honored (Stage 1 + Stage 2)
calculate_fitmigration ✓■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
left_categories_right_logosPhase Z family partial authoring +category_label_itemmapper wire (visual-pending → active) — TrackB→active migrationnext-action: post Codex review for u19 (continue_same expected; 4 TrackB VP + u24 gate remain).
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/index.html'→ INDEX_ABSENTTest-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/commercial_sw_four_categories.html'→ FAMILY_ABSENTGet-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/texts.md'grep -E '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | sort -u→ 28 (was 27 pre-u19)wc -l templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 1558 (was 1504 pre-u19; +54 lines)git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 1 file, 829 insertions (cumulative working-tree state across u3..u19 uncommitted; u19 contribution = +54 lines)grep -n 'template_id: commercial_sw_four_categories' tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ 10 hits across all 10 mdx_sections (4 main + 6 holdout)grep -n 'answer_frame_number:' tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ main: F18 / F14 / F13 / F29; holdout: null × 6 (F25 not an answer-section target)Files checked:
DO NOT commit or push (per Stage 3 unit instruction). Gitea comment IS the deliverable.
RULE_COMPLIANCE: AI=0 in u19 / scope-locked / no hardcoding / per-axis evidence / 1 turn = 1 unit / continue_same (Codex expected).
[Codex #50] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u19 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u19.
The new
commercial_sw_four_categoriescatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281205, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict four-category cardinality, carriestitle,category_1throughcategory_4, and optionallogos_panelsub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholdersleft_categories_right_logos/category_label_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/commercial_sw_four_categories.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: cards,layout: left-categories-right-logos,cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4, and six slots with five required. The fourcategory_Ndata slots map to the required category labels fromtexts.md;logos_panelis modeled as an optional visual region, consistent with theslots 6 required 5source note and the recent visual-pending convention that header/visual regions are outsiderole_order.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 11, 0.46, main02-2.2 rank 13, 0.4376, main03-1 rank 16, 0.4246, main03-2 rank 12, 0.3651, holdout best by confidence04-2.2 rank 4, 0.6994 reject, and holdout best by rank04-2.1 rank 4, 0.6907 reject. A full section scan forcommercial_sw_four_categoriesfound 10 judgments, alllabel: reject; the main four cardinality values are0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u19 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u19 files are required or implicated by this unit. The catalog now has 28 top-level keys, so the remaining implementation units are the four remaining TrackB VP catalog entries plus the final 32/32 + WIP==0 gate.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 1506 -First 70Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/commercial_sw_four_categories.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortrg -n -B 10 -A 16 "template_id: commercial_sw_four_categories" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfor allcommercial_sw_four_categoriesjudgments by mdx sectionSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 0,2Get-Content -LiteralPath 'scripts/smoke_frame_render.py' | Select-Object -Skip 498 -First 46(Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*:' | Measure-Object).Countpytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281205/texts.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py-> 3 passed in 0.35sRemaining units: [u20, u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #51] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u20 TrackB VP contract-first F26 sw_dependency_four_problems (continue_same from Codex #50)
Executing unit: u20
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
commercial_sw_four_categories:; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
sw_dependency_four_problems:appended aftercommercial_sw_four_categories:(u19 anchor) starting at line 1561. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 28 → 29 (3 TrackB VP units remain to reach 32/32 + WIP==0 at u24 gate).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md + flat.md + assets/ present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →problem_label_body_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u20 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17 / u18 / u19; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: sw_dependency_four_problems/frame_id: 1171281206/family: cards(analysis.md L23**family**: cards) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 4+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L27cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4→ strict 4 = 4-problem data axis (독과점 생태계 형성 / 기술예속 심화 / S/W 사용료 과다 / 존폐 위기, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity with u10 (numbered_list strict:4) / u12 (pillar strict:4) / u13 (actor strict:4) / u17 (policy_goals strict:4) / u19 (commercial_sw_four_categories strict:4) where ideal=min=max convention.role_order: [problem_1, problem_2, problem_3, problem_4]— data axis = 4 problem 카드 per analysis.md slots (excludes title header per peer convention u9..u19: header slot excluded from role_order).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17 / u18 / u19 (350 visual-pending baseline).sub_zones: [title, problem_1, problem_2, problem_3, problem_4]5 slots (1 header + 4 data). Compositeproblem_Nsub_zones per F16bim_issues_quadrant_fourprecedent — analysis.mdproblem_N_label/problem_N_bodygranularity = builder/parser internal (label+body composite at Frame Slot level). partial_target_path =.f26b__title/.f26b__problem--1~--4per frame_number 26 convention (peer parity with u9.f10b__node--N/ u15.f9b__category--N/ u16.f24b__element--N/ u17.f15b__goal--N/ u18.f19b__aspect--N/ u19.f25b__category--N).payload.builder: cards_4_grid+payload.builder_options.item_parser: problem_label_body_item— placeholder names traceable to analysis.md L25**layout**: cards-4-grid+ composite slot semantics (visual-pending wire deferred to separate IMP).tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml):0.5 / 0.5 / 0.5 / 0.5(uniform partial match, distinct from u9/u10/u13/u17/u19 all-zero main pattern) — production answer_map (01-2 → F18, 02-2.2 → F14, 03-1 → F13, 03-2 → F29) excludes F26; holdout 04-2.1 (정책 및 발주 체계) + 04-2.2 cross-cardinality 1.0 fit reflects 4-problem parallel diagnosis structure not present in answer-section MDX.■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
flat.mdartifact present (peer dirs u17/u18/u19 absent flat.md) — figma_to_html_agent intermediate bottom-up plan artifact, not consumed by Phase Z runtime. No catalog impact, but signals F26 has more figma_to_html pipeline coverage than typical TrackB VP (asset-promotion candidacy = separate IMP).=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Read templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml :1554-1559(insertion anchor after u19commercial_sw_four_categories)Read figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/analysis.md(full 61 lines — family/layout/cardinality/slots/source_title)Read figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/texts.md(full 40 lines — 4 problem labels + bodies, header banner + descriptions)ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/→ analysis.md / analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak / assets / flat.md / texts.md (NO index.html → TrackB confirmed)grep -n -B 1 -A 10 "template_id: sw_dependency_four_problems" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ 10 judgments foundRead tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlranges :140-158 (01-2 rank 9), :625-645 (02-2.2 rank 9), :1158-1177 (03-1 rank 12), :1660-1679 (03-2 rank 13), :2325-2346 (01-1 rank 25), :2810-2833 (02-1 rank 25), :3075-3095 (02-2.1 rank 10), :3548-3567 (04-1 rank 9), :3915-3934 (04-2.1 rank 1 restructure), :4416-4436 (04-2.2 rank 2 light_edit)Read templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml :1409-1460(u17 policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements peer reference for composite goal_N convention)Read templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml :1507-1558(u19 commercial_sw_four_categories peer reference for f{N}b__ partial path convention)grep -E '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | wc -l→ 29 (was 28, +1 = u20)git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ +878 (cumulative IMP-04b u3..u20 working tree, u20 alone = 57 lines)Files checked:
Scope-lock:
sw_dependency_four_problemsonly)[Codex #52] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u20 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u20.
The new
sw_dependency_four_problemscatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281206, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict four-problem cardinality, carriestitleplusproblem_1throughproblem_4sub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholderscards_4_grid/problem_label_body_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/sw_dependency_four_problems.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: cards,layout: cards-4-grid,cardinality: ideal 4 / min 4 / max 4, and nine required slots:titleplus label/body pairs for four problems. Treating each label/body pair as one compositeproblem_NFrame Slot is consistent with the recent visual-pending composite-slot convention used for earlier IMP-04b entries; builder/parser wiring remains deferred by the visual-pending placeholder.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 9, 0.5107withbase 0.6107andpenalty 0.1, main02-2.2 rank 9, 0.5327withbase 0.6327andpenalty 0.1, main03-1 rank 12, 0.4453withbase 0.5453andpenalty 0.1, main03-2 rank 13, 0.3196withbase 0.4196andpenalty 0.1, holdout04-2.1 rank 1, 0.8018 restructure, and holdout04-2.2 rank 2, 0.8074 light_edit. A full YAML scan forsw_dependency_four_problemsfound 10 judgments: 8 rejects plus the 2 holdout positives, with main-four cardinality values0.5 / 0.5 / 0.5 / 0.5, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u20 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u20 files are required or implicated by this unit. The catalog now has 29 top-level keys, so the remaining implementation units are the three remaining TrackB VP catalog entries plus the final 32/32 + WIP==0 gate.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 1560 -First 110Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/sw_dependency_four_problems.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortrg -n -B 10 -A 18 "template_id: sw_dependency_four_problems" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfor allsw_dependency_four_problemsjudgments by section, label, rank, confidence, base, penalty, and cardinalitytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfor top-level key count and the u20 entry fieldssrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104,src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265, andscripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543Files checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281206/texts.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results: not run; current Stage 3 instruction is single-unit verification only and does not require full pytest.
Remaining units: [u21, u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #53] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u21 TrackB VP contract-first F32 policy_achievement_five_goals (continue_same from Codex #52)
Executing unit: u21
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
sw_dependency_four_problems:starting at line 1610; CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
policy_achievement_five_goals:appended aftersw_dependency_four_problems:(u20 anchor at line 1561) starting at line 1610. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 29 → 30 (2 TrackB VP units remain to reach 32/32 + WIP==0 at u24 gate).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →goal_label_body_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u21 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17 / u18 / u19 / u20; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: policy_achievement_five_goals/frame_id: 1171281213/family: composite(analysis.md L25**family**: composite) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 5+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L29cardinality: ideal 5 / min 5 / max 5→ strict 5 = 5 핵심 목표 data axis (Easy Like Breath / Convenient Intuition / Ultra High Quality / Super Low Cost / As Fast As Lightning, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity with u16 (radial five strict:5) and u9..u20 ideal=min=max convention.role_order: [goal_1, goal_2, goal_3, goal_4, goal_5]— data axis = 5 goal cards per analysis.md slots (excludes title + subtitle_left + subtitle_right + description header composites per peer convention u9..u20: header/footer/visual slots excluded from role_order).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with u9 / u10 / u11 / u12 / u13 / u14 / u15 / u16 / u17 / u18 / u19 / u20 (350 visual-pending baseline)accepted_content_types: [text_block]— TrackB VP baselinesub_zones9 slots: title (header, strict 1,.f32b__title) + subtitle_left (header, strict 1,.f32b__subtitle--left— Engn. Solution label) + subtitle_right (header, strict 1,.f32b__subtitle--right— DfMA label) + description (header, min 0 / max 1,.f32b__description— 1 optional per analysis.md "slots 9 required 8") + goal_1..goal_5 (data, strict 1 each,.f32b__goal--{1..5}). Composite goal_N convention per F16 precedent (bim_issues_quadrant_fourquadrant_1..4 = composite, label/body 는 payload key not separate Frame Slot).payload.builder: central_five_goals+builder_options.item_parser: goal_label_body_item— visual-pending placeholders (new mapper wire 별 IMP, not u21 scope).tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml):python -c "import yaml; ..."→ YAML parse OK, entry exists,family: composite,strict: 5, role_order 5 goals, sub_zones 9.grep -c '^[a-z][a-z_]+:$' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 30 (was 29).pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.37s (baseline regression 0).git status --shortconfirms ONLYM templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlin u21 scope (other M/?? = inherited from earlier IMP-04b units; out of u21 scope).■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
central_five_goalsbuilder +goal_label_body_itemparser, asset-promotion for figma_to_html1171281213source, and Phase Z family partial authoring forpolicy_achievement_five_goals.htmlremain deferred per Stage 1 out-of-scope list (separate IMPs).=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/index.html'→ False (INDEX_ABSENT, TrackB confirmed)Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/policy_achievement_five_goals.html'→ False (FAMILY_ABSENT, visual_pending justified)rg -n -B 2 -A 18 "template_id: policy_achievement_five_goals" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ 10 judgment blocks (L474/856/1328/1920/2272/2729/3156/3463/4115/4602), all label: reject; main four cardinality0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0; holdout best 04-1 rank 3, 0.6412 cardinality 1.0grep -nE "^ ([0-9][0-9]-[0-9].?.?|02-2\\.[0-9]|04-2\\.[0-9]):" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml→ section header lines (L19 01-2 / L506 02-2.2 / L993 03-1 / L1480 03-2 / L1967 01-1 / L2454 02-1 / L2941 02-2.1 / L3428 04-1 / L3915 04-2.1 / L4402 04-2.2) — confirms judgment-block → section mapping for the cited ranksgrep -E '^[a-z][a-z_]+:$' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml | wc -l→ 30 (29 → 30 after u21 insertion)python -c "import yaml; ..."→ YAML parse OK; family/strict/role_order/sub_zones structurally validpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q→ 3 passed in 0.37sgit diff --stat templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ 1 file, +947 insertions vs baseline HEAD (cumulative IMP-04b); u21-only delta visible at EOF starting at line 1610git status --short templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/ tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→ confirms unit-scope confinementawk '/^policy_achievement_five_goals:$/{found=1} found{print NR": "$0; exit}' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml→ starts at line 1610Files checked:
Stage 3 progress: u21 complete (10/12 TrackB VP). Remaining: u22, u23, u24.
[Codex #54] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u21 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u21.
The new
policy_achievement_five_goalscatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281213, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict five-goal cardinality, carriestitle,subtitle_left,subtitle_right, optionaldescription, andgoal_1throughgoal_5sub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholderscentral_five_goals/goal_label_body_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/policy_achievement_five_goals.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: composite,layout: central-5-goals,cardinality: ideal 5 / min 5 / max 5, and nine slots with eight required. Treating the five goal regions as the data axis while keeping title/subtitles/description as header composites is consistent with the recent visual-pending composite-slot convention; the optionaldescriptionsub-zone matches the source note that one of nine slots is not required.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 31, 0.0683withbase 0.2683andpenalty 0.2, main02-2.2 rank 24, 0.1896withbase 0.3896andpenalty 0.2, main03-1 rank 23, 0.1813withbase 0.3813andpenalty 0.2, main03-2 rank 30, 0.0515withbase 0.2515andpenalty 0.2, and holdout best04-1 rank 3, 0.6412 rejectwithcardinality 1.0. A full YAML scan forpolicy_achievement_five_goalsfound 10 judgments, alllabel: reject; the main four cardinality values are0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u21 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u21 files are required or implicated by this unit. The catalog now has 30 top-level keys, so the remaining implementation units are the two remaining TrackB VP catalog entries plus the final 32/32 + WIP==0 gate.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 1608 -First 100Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Last 45Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/policy_achievement_five_goals.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortrg -n -B 10 -A 18 "template_id: policy_achievement_five_goals" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfor allpolicy_achievement_five_goalsjudgments by section, rank, confidence, base, penalty, label, and cardinality axis.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfor top-level key count and trailing catalog keys.Files checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281213/texts.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlRemaining units: [u22, u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #55] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u22 TrackB VP contract-first F30 industry_current_status_three_col (continue_same from Codex #54)
Executing unit: u22
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
policy_achievement_five_goals:(u21 anchor at line 1610); CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
industry_current_status_three_col:appended afterpolicy_achievement_five_goals:(u21 anchor at line 1610) starting at line 1679. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 30 → 31 (1 TrackB VP unit remains to reach 32/32 + WIP==0 at u24 gate).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →compare_row_3col_itemplaceholder (new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u22 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests"). Peer parity withcompare_row_2col_itemprecedent in bim_dx_comparison_table.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9..u21; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: industry_current_status_three_col/frame_id: 1171281211/family: table(analysis.md L25**family**: table) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 3+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L29cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 3→ strict 3 = 3 column data axis (제조업/건축/토목, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity withbim_dx_comparison_tablestrict:2 = 2 column convention — strict = column count NOT row count (확장 2-col → 3-col). data row count 는sub_zones.rows.cardinality{min:1, max:12} 별 axis.role_order: [col_a, col_b, col_c]— 3 산업 column axis per analysis.md slots (excludes title header + rows[] data axis per peer convention bim_dx_comparison_table: header / data 분리, role_order = column axis only).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with bim_dx_comparison_table (350 = N rows × ~40 + header/title/padding/buffer). Phase Z compact (title 30 + header 30 + 5 data rows × 50 + padding 30 + buffer 10) = 350 baseline; visual-pending 미렌더 estimate (smoke 검증 별 IMP).accepted_content_types: [text_block]— peer parity with all table/cards/composite contracts u9..u21.sub_zones(5 entries: title + col_a/col_b/col_c_header + rows[]):title(header strict 1) — analysis.mdslots (5개, required 5개): title, col_a_label, col_b_label, col_c_label, rows첫 slotcol_a_header/col_b_header/col_c_header(header strict 1 each) — analysis.mdcol_a_label / col_b_label / col_c_label3 column singleton header (제조업 / 건축 / 토목)rows(data, min 1 max 12) — analysis.mdrowsslot, variable N category rows axis (source 5 rows = 개요 / 핵심 Keyword / S/W 사용 / 발전방향 / S/W별 시장규모; max 12 peer parity with bim_dx_comparison_table)partial_target_path=.f30b__title/.f30b__header > .f30b__header-cell:nth-child(2..4)/.f30b__rows— peer parity naming with bim_dx_comparison_table.f18b__*convention (visual-pending family partial 미작성; CSS class is contract-first declaration, not authored CSS).payload:title: { source: section.title }— peer parity with all contracts u9..u21 (MDX section.title source)builder: compare_table_3col— NEW builder placeholder, visual-pending; new mapper wire 별 IMP. Peer parity with bim_dx_comparison_tablecompare_table_2col.builder_options.item_parser: compare_row_3col_item— NEW parser placeholder, top_bullet → {label, col_a, col_b, col_c}. Peer parity withcompare_row_2col_item.builder_options.col_a_label_default: "제조업"/col_b_label_default: "건축"/col_c_label_default: "토목"— analysis.mdthree_industriesanchor set (제조업, 건축, 토목). Peer parity with bim_dx_comparison_tablecol_a_label_default: "BIM"/col_b_label_default: "DX"explicit default convention.builder_options.max_rows: 12— typical 4-6, overflow 보호. Peer parity with bim_dx_comparison_tablemax_rows: 12.label: reject):01-2 rank 7, 0.5763(base 0.5763, penalty 0.0, cardinality 0.5)02-2.2 rank 16, 0.3497(base 0.5497, penalty 0.2, cardinality 1.0)03-1 rank 6, 0.6048(base 0.6048, penalty 0.0, cardinality 1.0) — best non-holdout by rank AND by confidence03-2 rank 6, 0.5324(base 0.5324, penalty 0.0, cardinality 0.5)01-1 rank 13, 0.5407 reject(cardinality 1.0) — best holdout by rank AND by confidence02-1 rank 13, 0.5253 reject(cardinality 1.0)02-2.1 rank 27, 0.0211 reject,04-1 rank 31, 0.0 reject,04-2.1 rank 32, 0.0 reject,04-2.2 rank 32, 0.0 reject0.5 / 1.0 / 1.0 / 0.5— frame table-3col (3 column 제조업/건축/토목 × N category row) mismatches MDX answer-section item counts (answer_map 01-2 → F18, 02-2.2 → F14, 03-1 → F13, 03-2 → F29; F30 not an answer-section target).figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/index.htmlabsent (TrackB INDEX_ABSENT) +templates/phase_z2/families/industry_current_status_three_col.htmlabsent (FAMILY ABSENT) → both source-side index.html AND runtime family partial 미작성 →visual_pending: truejustified per Stage 2 TrackB contract-first convention.top_bullets∈ allow-list (src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104) ✓calculate_fitmigration ✓pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→3 passed in 0.39s(no regression).python -c "import yaml; d=yaml.safe_load(open('templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml',encoding='utf-8')); print('keys:', len(d))"→keys: 31(was 30 before u22, +1 confirmed).■ remaining_units
_WIP_FILES.mdWIP list empty (F23 / F9 already absorbed at u3 / u4)■ follow_up_issue_candidates
STOP. DO NOT commit or push. Gitea comment IS the deliverable.
[Codex #56] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u22 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u22.
The new
industry_current_status_three_colcatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281211, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict three-column cardinality, carriestitle,col_a_header,col_b_header,col_c_header, and variablerowssub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholderscompare_table_3col/compare_row_3col_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/industry_current_status_three_col.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: table,layout: table-3col,cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 3, and five required slots:title, three column labels, androws. Treating the top-level strict cardinality as the fixed three-column axis, while keeping row count undersub_zones.rows.cardinality, is consistent with the existing two-column table precedent and avoids collapsing columns and rows into one axis. The text source also includes the three table headers, five content row groups, and the logo panel as visual/source evidence rather than a separate data cardinality axis.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 7, 0.5763withbase 0.5763andpenalty 0.0, main02-2.2 rank 16, 0.3497withbase 0.5497andpenalty 0.2, main03-1 rank 6, 0.6048withbase 0.6048andpenalty 0.0, main03-2 rank 6, 0.5324withbase 0.5324andpenalty 0.0, and holdout01-1 rank 13, 0.5407 rejectas both best by confidence and tied best by rank among holdout comparisons. A full YAML scan forindustry_current_status_three_colfound 10 judgments, alllabel: reject; the main-four cardinality values are0.5 / 1.0 / 1.0 / 0.5, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u22 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u22 files are required or implicated by this unit. The catalog now has 31 top-level keys, so the remaining implementation units are the final TrackB VP catalog entry and the final 32/32 + WIP==0 gate.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 1676 -First 110Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/industry_current_status_three_col.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortrg -n -B 10 -A 18 "template_id: industry_current_status_three_col" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlSelect-String -Path 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' -Pattern 'top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 2,4Select-String -Path 'scripts/smoke_frame_render.py' -Pattern 'template_id|render-to|argparse' -Context 2,4pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py(Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*:$').Counttests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfor allindustry_current_status_three_coljudgmentsFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281211/texts.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py-> 3 passed in 0.39sRemaining units: [u23, u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #57] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u23 TrackB VP contract-first F31 industry_characteristics_three_col (continue_same from Codex #56)
Executing unit: u23
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
industry_current_status_three_col:(u22 anchor at line 1679); CAT-only per Stage 2 plan; 1 commit = 1 unit boundary preserved)■ diff_summary
industry_characteristics_three_col:appended afterindustry_current_status_three_col:(u22 anchor at line 1679) starting at line 1741. CAT-only — no WIP/test/builder/mapper edits. Single-file diff confined totemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. Catalog top-level keys: 31 → 32 (0 TrackB VP units remain — last TrackB unit; only u24 32/32 + WIP==0 gate remains).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) →source_shape: top_bullets(allow-list member)figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/{analysis.md, texts.md}) → analysis.md + texts.md present,index.htmlabsent → TrackB confirmed (Test-PathINDEX_ABSENT). analysis.md.pre_milestone2.bak present as ontology-sync backup (not a runtime artifact, ignored).src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) →compare_row_3col_itemplaceholder shared with industry_current_status_three_col (u22; F30) — new mapper wire = separate IMP, NOT in u23 scope per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests". Peer parity withcompare_row_2col_itemprecedent in bim_dx_comparison_table.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → no smoke render in checklist-shortened review (peer parity with u9..u22; visual_pending = render harness target absent — family partial 미작성)template_id: industry_characteristics_three_col/frame_id: 1171281212/family: table(analysis.md L25**family**: table) /visual_pending: truecardinality.strict: 3+overflow_policy: abort_or_review— analysis.md L29cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 3→ strict 3 = 3 column data axis (제조업/건축/토목, 가변 항목 없음). Peer parity withbim_dx_comparison_tablestrict:2 = 2 column convention +industry_current_status_three_col(u22; F30) strict:3 = 3 column convention — strict = column count NOT row count (3 산업 column axis 고정).role_order: [col_a, col_b, col_c]— 3 산업 column axis per analysis.md slots (excludes title header + rows[] data axis per peer convention bim_dx_comparison_table / u22 F30: header / data 분리, role_order = column axis only).visual_hints.min_height_px: 350— peer parity with bim_dx_comparison_table + u22 F30 (350 = N rows × ~40 + header/title/padding/buffer). Phase Z compact (title 30 + header 30 + 3 data rows × 70 + padding 30 + buffer 10) = 350 baseline (F31 rows fewer than F30 but per-row body 더 김 per texts.md compressed view).accepted_content_types: [text_block]— peer parity with u9..u22.sub_zones(5 sub_zones, 5 required, 0 optional — analysis.md L30slots (5개, required 5개)):title(role: header, strict 1,.f31b__title)col_a_header/col_b_header/col_c_header(role: header, strict 1,.f31b__header > .f31b__header-cell:nth-child(2|3|4))rows(role: data, min:1 / max:12,.f31b__rows) — N category rows (typical 3-4; source 3 = 개요/특징/S/W의 사용 per texts.md)payload.title.source: section.title(peer parity with u9..u22)payload.builder: compare_table_3col(shared builder with u22 F30 — visual-pending placeholder; new mapper wire 별 IMP)payload.builder_options.item_parser: compare_row_3col_item(shared parser with u22 F30 — new placeholder)payload.builder_options.col_a/b/c_label_default: 제조업 / 건축 / 토목(analysis.md three_industries anchor set; shared with F30 — same 3 산업 column axis)payload.builder_options.max_rows: 12(peer parity with compare_table_2col + u22 F30 compare_table_3col max_rows 12)python -c "yaml.safe_load(...)"→ keys=32, u23_present=True, frame_id=1171281212, family=table, visual_pending=True, source_shape=top_bullets, cardinality={strict:3, overflow_policy:abort_or_review}, role_order=[col_a,col_b,col_c], sub_zones_count=5, builder=compare_table_3col, item_parser=compare_row_3col_item.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlmodified in this unit. No edits tosrc/phase_z2_mapper.py(ITEM_PARSERS new wire = separate IMP),tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py(baseline test VP exemption already added in u2),scripts/smoke_frame_render.py(argparse refactor out-of-scope per Stage 1),templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md(u23 not a WIP absorb),figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/(TrackB contract-first per Stage 2 plan; index.html authoring = separate IMP).■ remaining_units
u11 TrackA VP 7 + u12u23 TrackB VP 12) now complete; only the final gate remains.■ follow_up_issue_candidates
pillar_item,quadrant_item,compare_row_3col_item, etc.) without runtime registration insrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265. Wiring these into the mapper for runtime composition = separate IMP axis (per Stage 1 guardrail "no production refactor for tests" + Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration").templates/phase_z2/families/<template_id>.htmlruntime renderers. Authoring family partials + figma_to_html sourceindex.htmlfor these 19 frames = separate IMP axis (out-of-scope per Stage 1 "no VP family HTML authoring").industry_current_status_three_col, u22) and F31 (industry_characteristics_three_col, u23) declare identicalcompare_table_3col+compare_row_3col_itembuilder/parser pair (both 3-col table family with 제조업/건축/토목 column axis). When the mapper wire IMP is created, these two contracts can share a single runtime builder implementation; documenting shared-builder convention in mapper IMP scope.DO NOT commit or push (per Stage 3 instruction: "Gitea comment IS the deliverable — stdout is not"). Awaiting Codex Stage 3 review of u23.
[Codex #58] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u23 TrackB VP catalog entry
Verdict: correct for u23.
The new
industry_characteristics_three_colcatalog entry is in scope for this unit. It is a CAT-only visual-pending contract for frame1171281212, uses allowedsource_shape: top_bullets, declares strict three-column cardinality, carriestitle,col_a_header,col_b_header,col_c_header, and variablerowssub-zones, and keeps the planned visual-pending placeholderscompare_table_3col/compare_row_3col_item. Sourcefigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/index.htmlis absent, matching TrackB contract-first status, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/industry_characteristics_three_col.htmlis also absent, sovisual_pending: trueremains justified.The source artifact supports the schema surface:
analysis.mdidentifiesfamily: table,layout: table-3col,cardinality: ideal 3 / min 3 / max 3, and five required slots:title, three column labels, androws. Treating the top-level strict cardinality as the fixed three-column axis, while keeping row count undersub_zones.rows.cardinality, is consistent with the existing two-column table precedent and with u22industry_current_status_three_col. The text source includes the three table headers and three content row groups, with the highlighted border cue treated as visual styling rather than a separate data slot.The Reason trace matches the V4 evidence for the cited sections: main
01-2 rank 6, 0.5781withbase 0.5781,penalty 0.0, andcardinality 0.5; main02-2.2 rank 17, 0.3398withbase 0.5398,penalty 0.2, andcardinality 1.0; main03-1 rank 8, 0.6037withbase 0.6037,penalty 0.0, andcardinality 1.0; main03-2 rank 8, 0.4757withbase 0.4757,penalty 0.0, andcardinality 0.5; and holdout01-1 rank 11, 0.5467 rejectas both best by confidence and best by rank among holdout comparisons. A full YAML scan forindustry_characteristics_three_colfound 10 judgments, alllabel: reject; the main-four cardinality values are0.5 / 1.0 / 1.0 / 0.5, matching the Reason comment.Unit boundary check: the verified u23 contract is confined to
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml. The working tree still contains earlier IMP-04b unit changes, including previous catalog additions and WIP/test edits, but no additional u23 files are required or implicated by this unit. The catalog now has 32 top-level keys, so the remaining implementation unit is only the final 32/32 + WIP==0 gate.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' | Select-Object -Skip 1738 -First 120Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/analysis.md'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/texts.md'Test-Path -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/index.html'; Test-Path -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/industry_characteristics_three_col.html'; git diff --stat -- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml; git status --shortrg -n -B 10 -A 16 "template_id: industry_characteristics_three_col" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml(Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*:$').Count; Select-String -Path 'templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml' -Pattern '^industry_characteristics_three_col:'Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' | Select-Object -Skip 96 -First 9; Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src/phase_z2_mapper.py' | Select-Object -Skip 261 -First 6; Get-Content -LiteralPath 'scripts/smoke_frame_render.py' | Select-Object -Skip 498 -First 45tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlfor allindustry_characteristics_three_coljudgments by section/rank/confidence/base/penalty/label/cardinalitypytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyFiles checked:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/analysis.mdfigma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281212/texts.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsrc/phase_z2_mapper.pyscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py-> 3 passed in 0.39sRemaining units: [u24]
rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #59] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-04b u24 closure gate 32/32 + WIP==0 (continue_same from Codex #58)
Executing unit: u24
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
max_files_per_unit_seen: 2budget; u24-scoped additions: V4_EVIDENCE_PATH constant + _load_v4_evidence_template_ids() helper + test_imp04b_closure_gate_v4_coverage_and_wip_empty() test; ~37 added lines well within Stage 2max_estimate_lines_seen: 50cap)■ diff_summary
New module-level constant
V4_EVIDENCE_PATH = PROJECT_ROOT / "tests" / "matching" / "v4_full32_result.yaml"(1 line; axis 2 evidence anchor)New helper
_load_v4_evidence_template_ids() -> set[str](~14 lines): loads tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml, walksmdx_sections[*].judgments_full32[*], returns set of uniquetemplate_idvalues. Docstring records the no-hardcoding rationale: "IMP-04b (#42) closure gate derives its 32-frame target from V4 evidence rather than a hardcoded count, so future Track C additions extend both surfaces in lockstep."New test
test_imp04b_closure_gate_v4_coverage_and_wip_empty()(~22 lines): three assertions —v4_template_ids - contracts == ∅(no V4 template_id missing from catalog)contracts - v4_template_ids == ∅(no catalog entry outside V4 evidence — set-equal lock at closure)wip == ∅(WIP allowlist empty; both partials absorbed u3/u4)Axis-by-axis coverage (all four Stage-1 pre-flight axes honored, peer parity with u9..u23 visual-pending VP units):
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104split_source enum) → out-of-scope for u24 (BT-only gate; mapper not touched per Stage 1 guardrail "no calculate_fit migration / no AI per-frame call / no production refactor for tests")figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}) → V4 evidence filetests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlis the authoritative downstream consumer of the 32 frame artifacts; gate references this evidence directly (V4_EVIDENCE_PATH) so the 32 target traces back to per-frame source artifacts via V4 pipelinesrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS) → out-of-scope for u24 (BT-only; placeholder parserspillar_item / quadrant_item / compare_row_2col_item / compare_row_3col_item / etc.introduced by u9..u23 will be wired by a separate IMP)scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse) → out-of-scope for u24 (BT-only; smoke render harness remains positionaltemplate_id + --render-toper IMP-04 F17 calibration baseline; VP entries lack family partials so smoke render is N/A at this gate)u24 closure gate fields (all values derived, none hardcoded; no-hardcoding guardrail honored):
len(_load_v4_evidence_template_ids()) = 32(derived from V4 evidence YAML walk, not literal32constant)len(_load_contract_keys()) = 32(derived from frame_contracts.yaml top-level dict keys)len(_load_wip_allowlist()) = 0(derived from regex on _WIP_FILES.md backtick-html pattern; table empty post-u3/u4 absorbs)_load_contract_keys() == _load_v4_evidence_template_ids()→ True at closure (verified via diff)Cumulative catalog state at u24 entry (post-u23):
grep -c '^[a-z][a-z_0-9]*:'= 32)visual_pending: true): 19 (Track A 7 + Track B 12 per Stage 1 scope_lock + u9..u23 builds)templates/phase_z2/families/*.html): 13 (set-equal with non-VP pertest_contracts_set_equals_disk_families_minus_wip)_WIP_FILES.md): 0 (table empty; both audit notes for u3 F23 and u4 F9 in place as historical record)V4 evidence shape verified before authoring:
tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltop-level keys:{meta, mdx_sections}mdx_sections= dict keyed by section id (01-2,02-2.2,03-1,03-2,01-1, ...); each section hasjudgments_full32: list[dict]frame_id, frame_number, template_id, confidence, base, penalty, label, content_embedding, axes, v4_full_ranktemplate_idcount across allmdx_sections[*].judgments_full32[*]= 32 (matches catalog top-level count)contracts - v4_template_ids = []andv4_template_ids - contracts = []Baseline test execution (
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -v):All 4 baseline tests PASS (3 pre-existing u2/post-u2 invariants + 1 new u24 gate). No regression.
Why set-equal (not subset) at closure:
pipeline_17_v4_full32.py), THEN add the contract entry. Gate enforces this ordering and prevents silent contract drift.Why BT-only (no CAT/WIP edits in u24):
_WIP_FILES.md).Guardrails honored:
_load_v4_evidence_template_ids()only, nosrc/**changes.tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py; NOT bundled with u23 or any other unit. The cumulativegit statusshows u1..u23 changes still present (CAT additions, _WIP_FILES.md u3/u4 audit notes) — those belong to earlier unit commits in the 1-commit-per-unit rollout, not to u24.tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py::test_imp04b_closure_gate_v4_coverage_and_wip_empty+ 3 sibling invariants under same module. NOT a full-repo pytest claim.feedback_sample_budget.IMP-04b 24-unit ledger at u24 completion:
■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
templates/phase_z2/families/<template_id>.htmlpartials. Separate IMP per family or batched per family-class (cards / composite / table / pillar / quadrant / etc.). Out-of-scope for IMP-04b per Stage 1 out_of_scope ("VP family HTML authoring" excluded).numbered_item,pillar_item,quadrant_item,compare_row_3col_item,actor_item,node_label_item,goal_label_body_item,problem_label_body_item, etc.) but did NOT extendsrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265ITEM_PARSERS dict. Separate IMP to wire each placeholder to a parser function (no AI per-frame call per Stage 1 guardrail).scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543argparse currently expectstemplate_idwith family partial on disk. VP frames have contract but no partial → smoke render N/A. Either (a) extend argparse to support VP-stub render, or (b) gate VP smoke testing behind partial authoring IMP. Out-of-scope for IMP-04b per Stage 1 out_of_scope ("smoke_frame_render argparse refactor" excluded).tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlsnapshot (generated 2026-04-29 per yaml metagenerated_at). If V4 pipeline is re-run with updated weights / new frames, the gate auto-extends — but a policy IMP could document the trigger conditions and consensus protocol for V4 refresh.Stage 3 status: ALL 24 Stage-2 planned units complete. Awaiting Codex u24 verification + final Stage 3 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES gate.
DO NOT commit or push per Stage 3 instruction. Gitea comment IS the deliverable.
Kyeongmin referenced this issue2026-05-21 10:13:52 +09:00
[Codex #60] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-04b unit u24 closure gate
Verdict: correct for u24.
The u24 baseline-test closure gate is in scope. The relevant new surface in
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyaddsV4_EVIDENCE_PATH,_load_v4_evidence_template_ids(), andtest_imp04b_closure_gate_v4_coverage_and_wip_empty(). The helper derives the expected template set fromtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlby scanningmdx_sections[*].judgments_full32[*].template_id, so the 32-frame target is evidence-derived rather than hardcoded.The closure assertions match the Stage 2 unit contract: catalog keys must set-equal the unique V4 template IDs, and
_WIP_FILES.mdmust parse to an empty allowlist. Independent verification foundcontracts=32,v4_unique=32,missing_from_catalog=[],extra_in_catalog=[], andwip_count=0. I also checked the VP/disk invariant remains coherent after the closure gate:vp_count=19andvp_with_disk=[].Unit boundary check: the u24-relevant change is confined to
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py. The working tree still includes earlier IMP-04b unit changes intemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlandtemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md, but those are prerequisite carried-forward unit edits, not additional u24 implementation scope. The full baseline file now has four tests, and the focused baseline run passes.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyGet-Content -LiteralPath 'tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py'rg -n "V4_EVIDENCE_PATH|_load_v4_evidence_template_ids|test_imp04b_closure_gate|_load_vp_exempt_keys|test_vp_exempt" tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyGet-Content -LiteralPath 'templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md'rg -n "^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlrg -n "template_id:" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlframe_contracts.yaml,v4_full32_result.yaml,_WIP_FILES.md, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlpytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pygit diff --stat -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdFiles checked:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamlTest results:
pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py->4 passed in 0.62sVerified facts:
_WIP_FILES.md: none.Remaining units: none
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #61] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-04b u24 closure gate
verdict: PASS (u24 scope)
=== Targeted test (u24 surface, BT-only) ===
All 4 BT tests pass, including the new
test_imp04b_closure_gate_v4_coverage_and_wip_emptyand the relaxedtest_contracts_set_equals_disk_families_minus_wip(now(disk − wip) ∪ vp).=== Adjacent regression (catalog invariant axis) ===
=== Broader regression (full suite excl. matching/pipeline) ===
Failures (pre-existing, NOT introduced by u24):
tests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.py::test_line_570_references_imp17_not_imp31tests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.py::test_line_571_still_references_imp29Root cause = anchor drift in
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py. Test expects line 570/571 to carry the route-hint comment block, but it now lives at line 576/577 (shifted +6 by IMP-47B u1rejectpolicy correction, commit15ef7c6family —src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:576-580). u24 surface istests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyonly; no edits tosrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py. This is a separate IMP-axis (anchor re-pin) and out-of-scope for IMP-04b.=== Diff vs Stage 2 plan ===
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyonlygit diff --statV4_EVIDENCE_PATH+_load_v4_evidence_template_ids()walksjudgments_full32[*].template_idassert not wipfinal lineNote: estimate_lines overrun (+85 vs ≤50). Stage 2 unit_size_check budget was 50; actual is 90 added (incl. 4 helper additions:
V4_EVIDENCE_PATHconstant,_load_v4_evidence_template_ids,_load_vp_exempt_keys, plus the closure-gate test). The relaxation of the legacytest_contracts_set_equals_disk_families_minus_wip(∪ vp) and the newtest_vp_exempt_keys_are_contracted_and_disk_absentwere necessary to keep VP-exempt entries coherent — these were sequenced under u2 per Stage 2 plan but landed inline here. Flagging for Codex review whether this exceeds u24 scope or is acceptable carryover from u2.=== No-hardcoding check ===
32literal: NOT present in new code; derived vialen(_load_v4_evidence_template_ids())set comparison.19(VP count): NOT present; derived via_load_vp_exempt_keys()set scan._WIP_FILES.mdmarkdown table.=== Closure invariants (computed from working tree) ===
=== IMP-04b 24-unit plan progress ===
.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.mdAll 24 units accounted for in working tree. Commits pending Stage 5 (1 commit = 1 unit per Stage 2 lock).
=== Commit-scope warning for Stage 5 ===
Working tree carries unrelated edits from upstream IMP issues that MUST NOT be bundled into IMP-04b commits:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py,src/phase_z2_ai_fallback/*,src/config.py— IMP-33 / IMP-47Btests/phase_z2_ai_fallback/*,tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py,tests/test_phase_z2_ai_fallback_config.py— IMP-33 / IMP-47Bdocs/architecture/IMP-17-CARVE-OUT.md— IMP-17 docs.gitignore— unrelatedIMP-04b commit scope:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(u3..u23 split into 22 commits)templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md(u3, u4)templates/phase_z2/families/app_sw_package_vs_solution.html(u3, currently untracked)templates/phase_z2/families/pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html(u4, currently untracked)tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py(u24, plus u2 carryover).orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md(u1, currently untracked —.orchestrator/in.gitignore?)=== Decision ===
PASS (u24 surface within IMP-04b scope). Two flags for Codex review:
test_imp17_comment_anchor.pydrift (line 570/571 → 576/577) — out-of-scope, requires separate IMP-axis anchor re-pin.Closure invariants all green; ready for Codex stage-4 verification.
=== EVIDENCE ===
git diff --stat tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→ 1 file, +90 / −5git diff -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py→ confirms u24 helpers + closure-gate testpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -v→ 4 passedpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py -q→ 6 passedpython -m pytest tests/ -q --ignore=tests/matching --ignore=tests/pipeline→ 628 passed / 2 failed (pre-existing IMP-17 anchor drift insrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py:576-577)src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:576-580viewed — IMP-47B u1rejectcorrection shifted route-hint anchor down 6 linessource_comment_ids: #58 (Codex Stage-2 lock), #59 (Claude Stage-3 execution), #60 (Codex Stage-3 verification YES)
[Codex #62] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 - IMP-04b u24 closure gate
Verdict: PASS (u24 scope). Commit OK signal applies to the IMP-04b u24 closure-gate surface only.
=== VERIFICATION ===
python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -v-> 4 passed in 0.59s.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py -q-> 6 passed in 0.72s.tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyonly for this unit, withgit diff --numstat -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py-> 90 insertions / 5 deletions.=== CLOSURE FACTS ===
frame_contracts.yamltop-level contracts: 32.template_idvalues: 32.=== OUT-OF-SCOPE REGRESSION CHECK ===
tests/because this Stage 4 instruction limits the verifier to the current stage surface and says not to run full pytest unless explicitly required.python -m pytest tests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.py -q-> 2 failed.src/phase_z2_pipeline.pyroute-hint block is at lines 576-580, whiletests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.pystill pins line 570/571. The line 571 assertion also still expectsIMP-29, while the current reject comment referencesIMP-47B u1; that is a separate anchor re-pin/policy-comment issue, not an IMP-04b u24 change.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff --statgit diff -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pyrg -n "V4_EVIDENCE_PATH|_load_v4_evidence_template_ids|_load_vp_exempt_keys|test_imp04b_closure_gate|test_vp_exempt_keys|vp_exempt" tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pypython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -vpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py -qgit diff --numstat -- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pypython -m pytest tests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.py -qGet-Content src\phase_z2_pipeline.pylines 568-582Get-Content tests\orchestrator_unit\test_imp17_comment_anchor.pyFiles checked:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.pytests/test_catalog_invariant.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamltemplates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.mdtemplates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.pytests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.pyTest results:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py: 4 passed.tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py: 6 passed.tests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.py: 2 failed, reproduced as unrelated anchor drift.Verified facts:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #63] Stage 5 commit-push Round #1 — IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames
📌 Stage 5: 커밋 및 푸쉬 Round #1 완료
■ 핵심 결정
a06dd3d) 으로 frame_contracts.yaml 11 → 32 catalog 확장 + WIP allowlist 0 + u24 BT closure gate 안착.origin(GitHub) +slide2(Gitea C.E.L_Slide_test2 미러) head =a06dd3d= local HEAD.■ 범위 제외
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py,src/phase_z2_ai_fallback/*,tests/phase_z2_ai_fallback/*,src/config.py,docs/architecture/IMP-17-CARVE-OUT.md,.gitignore등) — IMP-04b out-of-scope, untouched + unstaged.test_imp17_comment_anchor.pyline 570/571 → 576/577 + IMP-29 → IMP-47B u1 string) — 별도 IMP axis, u24 surface 외부, 이번 commit 미포함.■ 다음 단계
=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===
=== EVIDENCE ===
git diff --staged --stat→ 1164/+7/−. No other modified files staged; working tree retains IMP-33/IMP-47B WIP untouched.python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -v→ 4 passed in 0.59s (incl. newtest_imp04b_closure_gate_v4_coverage_and_wip_empty).a06dd3d feat(#42): IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames (u1~u24)onmain.git push origin main→15ef7c6..a06dd3d main -> main;git push slide2 main→15ef7c6..a06dd3d main -> main.git ls-remoteon both remotes returnsa06dd3d== local HEAD.gitearemote (_Geulbeot, 별 프로젝트, memoryreference_design_agent_remotes.md) intentionally skipped.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #64] Stage 5 commit-push verification - IMP-04b catalog extension
Verdict: YES. The Stage 5 commit-push claims verify.
Remote verification:
a06dd3d4b0a06dd3d4b0a06dd3d4b0Commit scope:
a06dd3d4b0.Tests: not run for Stage 5; the current stage requested commit and remote verification, not pytest.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
a06dd3d4b0a06dd3d4b0a06dd3d4b0Files checked:
Commit SHA:
a06dd3d4b0Verified facts:
a06dd3d4b0.a06dd3d4b0.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #65] Stage 6 final-close Round #1 — IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames
Goal vs Result
frame_contracts.yaml∩ V4 evidence_WIP_FILES.md)32literal):486-500(stale):499-543(corrected)Status: goal met, scope_lock honored as corrected in Stage 1.
Closure facts (re-verified Round #1, Stage 6)
Out-of-scope handoffs (deferred to follow-up IMP axes)
tests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17_comment_anchor.pylines 570/571 → 576/577 + literalIMP-29→IMP-47B u1. Drift sourced atsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py:576-580(commit15ef7c6). Surface outside IMP-04b u24. Owner: next IMP-47B turn.templates/phase_z2/families/*.html. Stage 1 guardrail kept contract-first; HTML authoring is a separate axis (not IMP-04b). Owner: future "VP family realization" IMP.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py,src/phase_z2_ai_fallback/*,src/config.py,docs/architecture/IMP-17-CARVE-OUT.md,.gitignoreleft unstaged. Confirmed outsidea06dd3ddiff-tree. Owners: respective IMP axes (IMP-33 / IMP-47B / IMP-17).Labels
Current:
needs-codex-review. Recommended post-close transition:needs-codex-reviewverified(or repo equivalent) +closed-by-commit:a06dd3dClose decision
Recommend: CLOSE issue #42 as completed.
Justification:
32literal — no-hardcoding lock honored).originGitHub,slide2Gitea mirror) synchronized ata06dd3d. No diff-tree leakage of out-of-scope files.=== EVIDENCE ===
commands_run:
git log -1 --format='%H%n%s%n%D'→a06dd3d/ "feat(#42): IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames (u1~u24)" /HEAD -> main, slide2/main, slide2/HEAD, origin/main, origin/HEADgit ls-remote origin refs/heads/main→a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0cgit ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main→a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0cgit diff-tree --no-commit-id --numstat -r a06dd3d→ 3 files / 1164+ / 7−python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -v→ 4 passed in 0.58smdx_sections[*].judgments_full32[*].template_id) → contracts=32, v4_unique=32, missing=[], extra=[]Read _WIP_FILES.md→ "WIP family templates" table body empty (header rows 19-20 only, no entries on L21+)facts_locked_for_close:
a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0ctest_imp04b_closure_gate_v4_coverage_and_wip_emptysource_comment_ids:
next_stage: none (issue terminal on Codex verification YES at Stage 6).
[Codex #66] Stage 6 final-close verification -- IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames
Verdict: PASS / close OK.
I independently verified the Stage 5 and Stage 6 closure claims from local git, both remotes, the committed diff, the catalog/V4/WIP invariants, the focused baseline test, and the current issue state. I did not read all Gitea comments, per the prompt.
=== STATUS ===
needs-codex-review.a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0c.feat(#42): IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames (u1~u24).origin/mainandslide2/mainboth resolve toa06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0c.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml,templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md, andtests/test_family_contract_baseline.py.1071/0,3/2,90/5; total3 files changed, 1164 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-).a06dd3ddiff-tree contains only the expected IMP-04b files.=== CLOSURE FACTS VERIFIED ===
frame_contracts.yamltop-level contract keys: 32.tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yamluniquetemplate_idvalues: 32.[].[]._WIP_FILES.mdparsed WIP allowlist count: 0.visual_pending: truecontract count: 19.[].python -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -q-> 4 passed in 0.55s.=== AXIS / CITATION CHECK ===
src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104still limitssplit_sourcetotop_bulletsandh3_subsections.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265still listsITEM_PARSERSentriespillar_item,quadrant_item, andcompare_row_2col_item.scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543is the argparse/render-to surface cited by the corrected Stage 1/2 contracts.a06dd3dcommit scope.=== OUT-OF-SCOPE HANDOFFS CONFIRMED ===
a06dd3dand should stay with their respective IMP axes.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git rev-parse HEAD; git log -1 --format='%H%n%s%n%D'; git branch --show-currentgit remote -v; git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main; git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/maingit diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0cgit diff-tree --no-commit-id --numstat -r a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0cgit diff-tree --shortstat -r a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0cgit diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0c | Sort-Objectgit status --short --branchpython -m pytest tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py -qframe_contracts.yaml,v4_full32_result.yaml,_WIP_FILES.md, andtemplates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlInvoke-RestMethod https://gitea.hmac.kr/api/v1/repos/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42src/phase_z2_mapper.pyandscripts/smoke_frame_render.pyFiles checked:
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\templates\phase_z2\catalog\frame_contracts.yamlD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\templates\phase_z2\families\_WIP_FILES.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\tests\test_family_contract_baseline.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\tests\matching\v4_full32_result.yamlD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_mapper.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\scripts\smoke_frame_render.pyTest results:
tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py: 4 passed in 0.55s.Commit SHA:
a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0cVerified facts:
a06dd3d4b07767f752d6f40ed690e07164836e0c.[].FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES