Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 6 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

IMP-21 G2 — audit §1 lens B-1/B-2 column 정정 #21

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-12 17:56:59 +09:00 by Kyeongmin · 26 comments
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-12 17:56:59 +09:00
Owner
Copy Link

related layer: audit §1 lens (B-1 / B-2 columns)
source: INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 (§2.6 catch)
priority: ↓ low (doc-only)

scope:

  • content_editor.py 매핑 부정확 정정
  • B-1 zone-section override = pipeline.py / composition planner 영역 (content_editor 아님)
  • B-2 HTML→MDX 역변환 = 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx (content_editor 아님)
  • content_editor 는 block 안 slot 채우기 — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름

guardrail / validation:

  • audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관)
  • cross-ref 정합

dependency: none

cross-ref:

review loop:

  • Codex 1차 review
  • Claude 재검토
  • Codex 재검증
  • scope-locked
  • ready-for-implementation
  • implemented
  • verified
**related layer**: audit §1 lens (B-1 / B-2 columns) **source**: INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 (§2.6 catch) **priority**: ↓ low (doc-only) **scope**: - `content_editor.py` 매핑 부정확 정정 - B-1 zone-section override = `pipeline.py` / composition planner 영역 (content_editor 아님) - B-2 HTML→MDX 역변환 = 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx` (content_editor 아님) - content_editor 는 *block 안 slot 채우기* — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름 **guardrail / validation**: - audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) - cross-ref 정합 **dependency**: `none` **cross-ref**: - [backlog §3 IMP-21](https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/src/branch/main/docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md) - [INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2](https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/src/branch/main/docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md) - [PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens (B-1 / B-2)](https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/src/branch/main/docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md) **review loop**: - [ ] Codex 1차 review - [ ] Claude 재검토 - [ ] Codex 재검증 - [ ] scope-locked - [ ] ready-for-implementation - [ ] implemented - [ ] verified
Kyeongmin added the needs-codex-review label 2026-05-12 17:56:59 +09:00
Kyeongmin added this to the B-3 §3 audit §1 mapping correction (5) milestone 2026-05-12 18:16:12 +09:00
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 00:14:48 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #1] Stage 1 — 문제 검토 (Round 1)

Root cause

PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens table 의 B-1 / B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column 에 content_editor.py 가 잘못 listed. 실제 코드 확인 결과 content_editor 의 main role 은 block 안 slot 채우기 (forward direction, Kei AI slot fill) — B-1/B-2 영역과 abstraction 불일치.

Factual verification (value + path + upstream)

Audit doc 의 부정확한 entry (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md):

  • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) = pipeline.py, content_editor.py
  • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) = 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py
  • L125 (§1 의 §2 dependent module list) = 6. content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)

Source catch (이미 audit 안에 명시됨):

  • L642-643 (§2.6 content_editor audit) = B-1 / B-2 row 의 content_editor.py 매핑을 (부정확) 으로 표시 + G2 별 axis 후보로 surface
  • L672 (§2.6 audit 판정 surface) = "§1 audit lens 표의 B-1 / B-2 후보 파일 매핑 정정 필요 (G2 별 axis)"
  • L679 (G2 별 axis 후보 surface) = 동일 catch 박힘

Cross-ref (별 doc):

  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md §4 G2 row = "B-1 / B-2 column 매핑 부정확. content_editor 는 block 안 slot 채우기 — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름"
  • PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md §3 IMP-21 row = scope = "content_editor.py 매핑 부정확 정정"

Actual code (B-1 / B-2 영역 실제 위치):

  • B-1 zone-section override implementation: src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1491 (override_section_assignments 파라미터), :1526 (overrides apply), :1619-1708 (composition planner override path + section_assignment_overrides_applied/skipped artifact), :2735 (composition_planner_debug)
  • B-2 reverse path verification utility: src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py:68, 93, 155 (B-2 reverse path verification utility — 단 main reverse path = 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx)
  • content_editor.py 의 함수 inventory (src/content_editor.py:73, 290, 335, 446): fill_content, _call_kei_editor_with_retry, fill_candidates, _parse_json — 모두 slot fill (forward direction). override_section / html_to_slide_mdx / reverse path 호출 또는 정의 0 건

→ 코드 확인으로 audit 의 (부정확) 라벨이 정확함을 confirm. content_editor.py 는 B-1/B-2 와 abstraction 다른 layer.

Scope-lock

IN scope

PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens 표 안 content_editor.py 매핑 entry 만 정정:

  1. L104 — §1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column : pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py만 유지 (content_editor.py 삭제)
  2. L105 — §1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column : 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx만 유지 (content_editor.py 삭제)
  3. L125 — §1 의 §2 audit module list entry 6 : content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → 라벨 정정 ((B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 — §2.6 G2 catch — Archive Candidate) 형태로 변경 — 모듈 자체는 §2.6 에서 audit 되었으므로 list 에서 제거 X, 라벨만 정정)

OUT of scope (other issues / axes)

  • B-1 row 의 pipeline.py 매핑 정확도 정정 → IMP-25 (L5 catch) 별 issue 영역 (pipeline.py 가 간접 surface 라는 catch 는 별 issue)
  • A-3 / A-4 row 의 renderer.py 매핑 정확도 정정 → IMP-22 (I6 catch) 별 issue
  • A-3 / A-4 row 의 html_generator.py 매핑 정확도 정정 → IMP-23 (J5 catch) 별 issue
  • A-2 row 의 block_reference.py / block_selector.py 매핑 정확도 정정 → IMP-24 (K6 catch) 별 issue
  • §2.6 audit body (L642-643, L679) 의 G2 catch 내용 = 이미 정확히 박힘 → 손대지 않음
  • code 변경 = 0 (issue priority = ↓ low, doc-only)
  • 다른 axis (B-1/B-2 자체의 implementation 작업 — IMP-06, IMP-07) 와 무관

Guardrails

  1. G2 catch 만 수정 — I6/J5/K6/L5 catch 는 별 issue 영역
  2. §2.6 audit body 보존 — G2 catch source 가 이미 §2.6 에 명시 + INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 + backlog §3 IMP-21 와 정합
  3. doc-only — code 0 변경
  4. cross-ref 정합 — 정정 후에도 다음 3 doc 의 G2 catch 표현이 mutually consistent 해야 함 :
    • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens table (정정 대상)
    • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 content_editor audit (G2 source — 보존)
    • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md §4 G2 row (이미 catch 명시 — 보존)
    • PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md §3 IMP-21 row (이미 scope 명시 — 보존)
  5. B-1 row L5 catch (pipeline.py 간접 surface) 와 충돌 회피 — 본 정정 후 B-1 row 의 pipeline.py 매핑은 유지 (L5 정정은 IMP-25 영역). 본 issue 안에서 pipeline.py 를 추가로 손대거나 footnote 박는 행위 금지
  6. 22-step invariant — 회귀 risk 없음 (doc-only)

Validation

정정 후 다음 3 fact 가 모두 성립해야 함 :

  1. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 (B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일") 에 content_editor.py 부재
  2. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 (B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일") 에 content_editor.py 부재
  3. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L125 (§1 module list entry 6) 의 라벨이 (B-1, B-2) 직접 매핑이라고 더 이상 주장하지 않음 (§2.6 G2 catch 같은 정정 라벨로 변경)

추가 :

  • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 audit body (L642-643, L679) 보존 확인 (G2 source)
  • INSIGHT-MAP.md §4 G2 row 변경 0 (이미 catch 명시)
  • BACKLOG.md §3 IMP-21 row 변경 0 (이미 scope 명시)
  • code 변경 0 건 (git diff stat = 1 file changed, doc 만)

Dependency

none (issue body 와 일치 confirm). IMP-22/23/24/25 와 같은 audit §1 lens 정정군 안에서 row 영역이 분리되어 있음 — 박기 순서 의존 없음 (각 row 의 영역이 다름).

Notes

  • catch 자체는 audit 안에 이미 박혀 있고 (§2.6 G2), INSIGHT-MAP / BACKLOG 도 catch 를 명시 → 본 Stage 1 review 는 catch 위치 + scope-lock + cross-ref 일관성 4 doc 확인 이 핵심
  • 정정 표현은 Stage 2 plan 에서 박을 것 (예: footnote / inline 표기 / 별 메모 — 다음 stage 결정)
  • IMP-21 priority = ↓ low (doc-only) — review loop 도 minimal turnaround 기대

rewind_target: stage_2_plan

FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO

=== EVIDENCE ===
(NO — Stage 1 problem-review draft 단계. 100% 합의 전. Codex 1차 review 진입 필요 → stage_2_plan 으로 진입 위해 NO + rewind_target.)

  • read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L90-225, L615-715 (§1 lens table + §2.6 content_editor audit)
  • read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (전체, §4 G2 row 포함)
  • read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md (전체, §3 IMP-21 포함)
  • grep: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\content_editor.py — override_section / html_to_slide_mdx / reverse 모두 0 hit. 함수 inventory = fill_content (L73) / _call_kei_editor_with_retry (L290) / fill_candidates (L335) / _parse_json (L446) — slot fill forward direction only
  • grep: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\ — override_section_assignments hit = phase_z2_pipeline.py L1491, 1526, 1619-1708, 2735 (B-1 영역 실제 위치 confirm)
  • grep: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\ — reverse path / html_to_slide_mdx hit = phase_z2_verification_utils.py L68, 93, 155 (B-2 verification utility) + content_verifier.py import 흔적만 (main reverse path 부재) — B-2 main = 글벗 fmt_slide.html_to_slide_mdx 라는 audit 의 claim confirm
  • code change: 0 (doc-only Stage 1 review)
  • commit: none (Stage 1 = review draft)
[Claude #1] Stage 1 — 문제 검토 (Round 1) ## Root cause `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §1 lens table 의 **B-1 / B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column** 에 `content_editor.py` 가 잘못 listed. 실제 코드 확인 결과 content_editor 의 main role 은 *block 안 slot 채우기* (forward direction, Kei AI slot fill) — B-1/B-2 영역과 abstraction 불일치. ### Factual verification (value + path + upstream) **Audit doc 의 부정확한 entry** (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md): - L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) = `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` - L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) = `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` - L125 (§1 의 §2 dependent module list) = `6. content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` **Source catch (이미 audit 안에 명시됨)**: - L642-643 (§2.6 content_editor audit) = B-1 / B-2 row 의 `content_editor.py` 매핑을 (부정확) 으로 표시 + G2 별 axis 후보로 surface - L672 (§2.6 audit 판정 surface) = "§1 audit lens 표의 B-1 / B-2 후보 파일 매핑 정정 필요 (G2 별 axis)" - L679 (G2 별 axis 후보 surface) = 동일 catch 박힘 **Cross-ref (별 doc)**: - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` §4 G2 row = "B-1 / B-2 column 매핑 부정확. content_editor 는 *block 안 slot 채우기* — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름" - `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` §3 IMP-21 row = scope = "content_editor.py 매핑 부정확 정정" **Actual code (B-1 / B-2 영역 실제 위치)**: - B-1 zone-section override implementation: `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1491` (`override_section_assignments` 파라미터), `:1526` (overrides apply), `:1619-1708` (composition planner override path + `section_assignment_overrides_applied/skipped` artifact), `:2735` (`composition_planner_debug`) - B-2 reverse path verification utility: `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py:68, 93, 155` (B-2 reverse path verification utility — 단 main reverse path = 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`) - content_editor.py 의 함수 inventory (`src/content_editor.py:73, 290, 335, 446`): `fill_content`, `_call_kei_editor_with_retry`, `fill_candidates`, `_parse_json` — *모두 slot fill (forward direction)*. `override_section` / `html_to_slide_mdx` / `reverse path` 호출 또는 정의 0 건 → 코드 확인으로 audit 의 (부정확) 라벨이 정확함을 confirm. content_editor.py 는 B-1/B-2 와 abstraction 다른 layer. ## Scope-lock ### IN scope PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens 표 안 *`content_editor.py` 매핑 entry 만* 정정: 1. **L104 — §1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column** : `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`*만* 유지 (content_editor.py 삭제) 2. **L105 — §1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column** : `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`*만* 유지 (content_editor.py 삭제) 3. **L125 — §1 의 §2 audit module list entry 6** : `content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` → 라벨 정정 (`(B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 — §2.6 G2 catch — Archive Candidate)` 형태로 변경 — 모듈 자체는 §2.6 에서 audit 되었으므로 list 에서 제거 X, 라벨만 정정) ### OUT of scope (other issues / axes) - B-1 row 의 `pipeline.py` 매핑 정확도 정정 → **IMP-25 (L5 catch) 별 issue 영역** (pipeline.py 가 *간접 surface* 라는 catch 는 별 issue) - A-3 / A-4 row 의 `renderer.py` 매핑 정확도 정정 → **IMP-22 (I6 catch) 별 issue** - A-3 / A-4 row 의 `html_generator.py` 매핑 정확도 정정 → **IMP-23 (J5 catch) 별 issue** - A-2 row 의 `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` 매핑 정확도 정정 → **IMP-24 (K6 catch) 별 issue** - §2.6 audit body (L642-643, L679) 의 G2 catch 내용 = 이미 정확히 박힘 → 손대지 않음 - code 변경 = 0 (issue priority = ↓ low, doc-only) - 다른 axis (B-1/B-2 자체의 implementation 작업 — IMP-06, IMP-07) 와 무관 ## Guardrails 1. **G2 catch 만 수정** — I6/J5/K6/L5 catch 는 별 issue 영역 2. **§2.6 audit body 보존** — G2 catch source 가 이미 §2.6 에 명시 + INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 + backlog §3 IMP-21 와 정합 3. **doc-only** — code 0 변경 4. **cross-ref 정합** — 정정 후에도 다음 3 doc 의 G2 catch 표현이 mutually consistent 해야 함 : - `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §1 lens table (정정 대상) - `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §2.6 content_editor audit (G2 source — 보존) - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` §4 G2 row (이미 catch 명시 — 보존) - `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` §3 IMP-21 row (이미 scope 명시 — 보존) 5. **B-1 row L5 catch (pipeline.py 간접 surface) 와 충돌 회피** — 본 정정 후 B-1 row 의 `pipeline.py` 매핑은 유지 (L5 정정은 IMP-25 영역). 본 issue 안에서 pipeline.py 를 추가로 손대거나 footnote 박는 행위 금지 6. **22-step invariant** — 회귀 risk 없음 (doc-only) ## Validation 정정 후 다음 3 fact 가 모두 성립해야 함 : 1. `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L104 (B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일") 에 `content_editor.py` 부재 2. `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L105 (B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일") 에 `content_editor.py` 부재 3. `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L125 (§1 module list entry 6) 의 라벨이 (B-1, B-2) 직접 매핑이라고 더 이상 주장하지 않음 (`§2.6 G2 catch` 같은 정정 라벨로 변경) 추가 : - `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §2.6 audit body (L642-643, L679) 보존 확인 (G2 source) - `INSIGHT-MAP.md` §4 G2 row 변경 0 (이미 catch 명시) - `BACKLOG.md` §3 IMP-21 row 변경 0 (이미 scope 명시) - code 변경 0 건 (git diff stat = 1 file changed, doc 만) ## Dependency `none` (issue body 와 일치 confirm). IMP-22/23/24/25 와 같은 audit §1 lens 정정군 안에서 row 영역이 분리되어 있음 — 박기 순서 의존 없음 (각 row 의 영역이 다름). ## Notes - catch 자체는 audit 안에 이미 박혀 있고 (§2.6 G2), INSIGHT-MAP / BACKLOG 도 catch 를 명시 → 본 Stage 1 review 는 *catch 위치 + scope-lock + cross-ref 일관성 4 doc 확인* 이 핵심 - 정정 표현은 Stage 2 plan 에서 박을 것 (예: footnote / inline 표기 / 별 메모 — 다음 stage 결정) - IMP-21 priority = ↓ low (doc-only) — review loop 도 minimal turnaround 기대 --- rewind_target: stage_2_plan FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO === EVIDENCE === (NO — Stage 1 problem-review draft 단계. 100% 합의 전. Codex 1차 review 진입 필요 → stage_2_plan 으로 진입 위해 NO + rewind_target.) - read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L90-225, L615-715 (§1 lens table + §2.6 content_editor audit) - read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` (전체, §4 G2 row 포함) - read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` (전체, §3 IMP-21 포함) - grep: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\content_editor.py` — `override_section` / `html_to_slide_mdx` / `reverse` 모두 0 hit. 함수 inventory = `fill_content` (L73) / `_call_kei_editor_with_retry` (L290) / `fill_candidates` (L335) / `_parse_json` (L446) — slot fill forward direction only - grep: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\` — `override_section_assignments` hit = `phase_z2_pipeline.py` L1491, 1526, 1619-1708, 2735 (B-1 영역 실제 위치 confirm) - grep: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\` — `reverse path` / `html_to_slide_mdx` hit = `phase_z2_verification_utils.py` L68, 93, 155 (B-2 verification utility) + content_verifier.py import 흔적만 (main reverse path 부재) — B-2 main = 글벗 `fmt_slide.html_to_slide_mdx` 라는 audit 의 claim confirm - code change: 0 (doc-only Stage 1 review) - commit: none (Stage 1 = review draft)
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 11:41:50 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #2] Stage 1 — problem review (Round 2)

Codex r1 precision note reconciliation

Codex r1 raised one precision point: fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx is not a local repo file; only src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py is the local B-2 verification surface. Verified independently:

  • rg -n "html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide" src/ → 0 hits (no local source)
  • src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py:64-73 (extract_text_from_html) + L89-104 (normalize_for_comparison) + L147-166 (strip_meta_lines) = deterministic text-extract / normalize utilities for B-2 reverse-path verification only (not the main reverse adapter)
  • Audit doc L105 already uses 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx — the 글벗 prefix already marks it as external/reference (글벗 = separate sibling repo). The doc is already directionally correct on that token; only content_editor.py is the false co-listing.
  • Claude r1 evidence (Round 1 draft L25) already noted this same split: phase_z2_verification_utils.py = verification utility; main reverse path = 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx

→ Codex's precision note is factually correct and consistent with Claude r1 evidence. It does not alter the IMP-21 scope: the only inaccurate token in L104/L105 is content_editor.py. The pipeline.py (B-1) and 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx (B-2) tokens remain in scope-OUT (IMP-25 / external-ref-precision = separate axes).

Scope-lock (re-confirmed, unchanged from Round 1)

IN scope (single doc, 3 edits)

PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only — remove content_editor.py from §1 lens table entries that incorrectly co-list it:

  1. L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) — pipeline.py, content_editor.py → drop content_editor.py (keep pipeline.py as-is; pipeline.py precision = IMP-25 axis, out of scope)
  2. L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) — 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → drop content_editor.py (keep 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx as-is; the 글벗 prefix already marks it as external reference, consistent with Codex r1 note)
  3. L125 (§1 → §2 audit module list entry 6) — content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → relabel to a form that no longer asserts direct B-1/B-2 ownership while preserving the §2.6 G2 catch back-link (exact label string = Stage 2 plan decision; e.g. content_editor.py (§2.6 G2 catch — Archive Candidate; B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확)). Module remains listed (it is audited in §2.6); only the (B-1, B-2) ownership claim changes.

OUT of scope (mapped to sibling axes)

  • B-1 row pipeline.py precision (간접 surface vs. direct implementation in phase_z2_pipeline.py) → IMP-25 (L5 catch)
  • B-2 row 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx external-ref precision (e.g., explicit (external repo) marker) → not blocking IMP-21; Codex r1 precision noted, can be deferred to a separate doc-precision axis if backlog promotes it
  • A-3 / A-4 renderer.py → IMP-22 (I6)
  • A-3 / A-4 html_generator.py → IMP-23 (J5)
  • A-2 block_reference.py / block_selector.py → IMP-24 (K6)
  • §2.6 audit body (L640-643, L671-672, L677-681) — G2 catch source, already correct; preserve verbatim
  • Code changes = 0 (issue priority = ↓ low, doc-only)
  • IMP-06 / IMP-07 (B-1 / B-2 implementation work) — orthogonal axes

Guardrails (re-affirmed)

  1. G2 catch only — I6/J5/K6/L5 are sibling axes; do not touch
  2. §2.6 audit body preserved — G2 catch source already correct; do not edit L640-643, L671-672, L677-681
  3. doc-only — git diff --stat after edit must show exactly 1 file changed (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md), 0 source files
  4. Cross-ref consistency — 4 docs must remain mutually consistent after edit:
    • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens table (edit target)
    • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 content_editor audit (preserve — G2 source)
    • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md §4 G2 row (preserve — catch already correct)
    • PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md §3 IMP-21 row (preserve — scope already correct)
  5. No L5 leak — do not touch B-1 row's pipeline.py token (sibling axis IMP-25)
  6. 22-step invariant — no regression risk (doc-only edit, no runtime path touched)
  7. §1 module list entry 6 preservation rule — keep content_editor.py in the §1 module list (it IS audited in §2.6); only the (B-1, B-2) ownership label gets corrected. Removing the row would orphan the §2.6 audit.

Validation (Stage 4 success criteria)

After Stage 3 edit, these 5 facts must all hold:

  1. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 (B-1 "Phase Q 후보 파일") does NOT contain content_editor.py
  2. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 (B-2 "Phase Q 후보 파일") does NOT contain content_editor.py
  3. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 module list entry 6 (around L125) label no longer asserts direct (B-1, B-2) ownership but retains a back-link to §2.6 G2 catch
  4. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 (L630-688) byte-identical to pre-edit (G2 source preservation)
  5. git diff --stat shows exactly 1 file changed (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md); src/** and tests/** untouched

Cross-ref verification (no edit needed):

  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 row — diff = 0 (already correct)
  • BACKLOG §3 IMP-21 row — diff = 0 (already correct)

Dependency

none — confirmed against issue body. IMP-22/23/24/25 sibling axes touch different rows; row-independence holds, no ordering required.

Round 2 verdict

  • Codex r1 = FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES with valid precision note → precision note already aligned with Claude r1 evidence (Round 1 draft L25)
  • Claude r1 = NO with rewind_target stage_2_plan → resolved by Round 2 re-affirmation: scope-lock unchanged, Codex precision note non-blocking
  • Both reviewers' analyses converge on the same 3-edit scope-lock on a single file (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md)
  • No new files to read, no new assumptions, no scope drift

Ready for Stage 2 (simulation-plan): determine exact replacement strings for L104, L105, L125 and the §1 module list entry 6 relabel form.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

=== EVIDENCE ===

Commands run:

  • rg -n "html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide" src/ (0 hits — confirms Codex r1 precision)
  • rg -n "html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide" -S . (only doc + .orchestrator hits — confirms external/reference status)
  • Read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-134 (§1 lens table + module list)
  • Read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L630-688 (§2.6 content_editor audit — G2 source)
  • Read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py L60-170 (B-2 verification utility surface)
  • Read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_codex_r1.md (Codex r1 final, FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES confirmed)
  • Read: D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_claude_r1.md (Claude r1, scope-lock baseline)

Files checked:

  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (L95-134, L630-688)
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py (L60-170)
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_codex_r1.md
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_claude_r1.md

Verified facts:

  • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 currently lists pipeline.py, content_editor.py in B-1 "Phase Q 후보 파일" column
  • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 currently lists 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py in B-2 "Phase Q 후보 파일" column
  • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L125 currently lists content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) in §1 module list entry 6
  • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 (L630-688) flags both B-1 and B-2 content_editor.py mappings as (부정확) at L642-643 and surfaces G2 axis at L672 and L679
  • src/content_editor.py contains only forward slot-fill helpers (fill_content, _call_kei_editor_with_retry, fill_candidates, _parse_json); 0 hits for override_section / html_to_slide_mdx / reverse
  • src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py is the deterministic local B-2 verification utility (not the main reverse adapter); confirms Codex r1 precision
  • fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx has 0 source-file hits in src/ — confirmed external (글벗 sibling repo per audit doc's 글벗 prefix)
  • No regression risk: scope is doc-only, single file, 3 token-level edits

Test results:

  • Not run. Stage 1 = review only, no pytest by protocol.

Commit:

  • None (Stage 1 = review draft, no edit committed).
[Claude #2] Stage 1 — problem review (Round 2) ## Codex r1 precision note reconciliation Codex r1 raised one precision point: `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` is not a local repo file; only `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py` is the local B-2 verification surface. Verified independently: - `rg -n "html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide" src/` → 0 hits (no local source) - `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py:64-73` (`extract_text_from_html`) + L89-104 (`normalize_for_comparison`) + L147-166 (`strip_meta_lines`) = deterministic text-extract / normalize utilities for B-2 reverse-path *verification only* (not the main reverse adapter) - Audit doc L105 already uses `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` — the `글벗` prefix already marks it as external/reference (글벗 = separate sibling repo). The doc is already directionally correct on that token; only `content_editor.py` is the false co-listing. - Claude r1 evidence (Round 1 draft L25) already noted this same split: `phase_z2_verification_utils.py` = verification utility; main reverse path = 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` → Codex's precision note is factually correct and *consistent with* Claude r1 evidence. It does **not** alter the IMP-21 scope: the only inaccurate token in L104/L105 is `content_editor.py`. The `pipeline.py` (B-1) and `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` (B-2) tokens remain in scope-OUT (IMP-25 / external-ref-precision = separate axes). ## Scope-lock (re-confirmed, unchanged from Round 1) ### IN scope (single doc, 3 edits) PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only — remove `content_editor.py` from §1 lens table entries that incorrectly co-list it: 1. **L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column)** — `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → drop `content_editor.py` (keep `pipeline.py` as-is; pipeline.py precision = IMP-25 axis, out of scope) 2. **L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column)** — `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → drop `content_editor.py` (keep `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` as-is; the `글벗` prefix already marks it as external reference, consistent with Codex r1 note) 3. **L125 (§1 → §2 audit module list entry 6)** — `content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` → relabel to a form that no longer asserts direct B-1/B-2 ownership while preserving the §2.6 G2 catch back-link (exact label string = Stage 2 plan decision; e.g. `content_editor.py (§2.6 G2 catch — Archive Candidate; B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확)`). Module remains listed (it is audited in §2.6); only the (B-1, B-2) ownership claim changes. ### OUT of scope (mapped to sibling axes) - B-1 row `pipeline.py` precision (간접 surface vs. direct implementation in `phase_z2_pipeline.py`) → **IMP-25 (L5 catch)** - B-2 row `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` external-ref precision (e.g., explicit `(external repo)` marker) → not blocking IMP-21; Codex r1 precision noted, can be deferred to a separate doc-precision axis if backlog promotes it - A-3 / A-4 `renderer.py` → **IMP-22 (I6)** - A-3 / A-4 `html_generator.py` → **IMP-23 (J5)** - A-2 `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` → **IMP-24 (K6)** - §2.6 audit body (L640-643, L671-672, L677-681) — G2 catch source, already correct; **preserve verbatim** - Code changes = 0 (issue priority = ↓ low, doc-only) - IMP-06 / IMP-07 (B-1 / B-2 implementation work) — orthogonal axes ## Guardrails (re-affirmed) 1. **G2 catch only** — I6/J5/K6/L5 are sibling axes; do not touch 2. **§2.6 audit body preserved** — G2 catch source already correct; do not edit L640-643, L671-672, L677-681 3. **doc-only** — `git diff --stat` after edit must show exactly 1 file changed (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`), 0 source files 4. **Cross-ref consistency** — 4 docs must remain mutually consistent after edit: - `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §1 lens table (edit target) - `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §2.6 content_editor audit (preserve — G2 source) - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` §4 G2 row (preserve — catch already correct) - `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` §3 IMP-21 row (preserve — scope already correct) 5. **No L5 leak** — do not touch B-1 row's `pipeline.py` token (sibling axis IMP-25) 6. **22-step invariant** — no regression risk (doc-only edit, no runtime path touched) 7. **§1 module list entry 6 preservation rule** — keep `content_editor.py` in the §1 module list (it IS audited in §2.6); only the (B-1, B-2) ownership label gets corrected. Removing the row would orphan the §2.6 audit. ## Validation (Stage 4 success criteria) After Stage 3 edit, these 5 facts must all hold: 1. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 (B-1 "Phase Q 후보 파일") does NOT contain `content_editor.py` 2. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 (B-2 "Phase Q 후보 파일") does NOT contain `content_editor.py` 3. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 module list entry 6 (around L125) label no longer asserts direct (B-1, B-2) ownership but retains a back-link to §2.6 G2 catch 4. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 (L630-688) byte-identical to pre-edit (G2 source preservation) 5. `git diff --stat` shows exactly 1 file changed (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`); `src/**` and `tests/**` untouched Cross-ref verification (no edit needed): - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 row — diff = 0 (already correct) - BACKLOG §3 IMP-21 row — diff = 0 (already correct) ## Dependency `none` — confirmed against issue body. IMP-22/23/24/25 sibling axes touch different rows; row-independence holds, no ordering required. ## Round 2 verdict - Codex r1 = FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES with valid precision note → precision note already aligned with Claude r1 evidence (Round 1 draft L25) - Claude r1 = NO with rewind_target stage_2_plan → resolved by Round 2 re-affirmation: scope-lock unchanged, Codex precision note non-blocking - Both reviewers' analyses converge on the same 3-edit scope-lock on a single file (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md) - No new files to read, no new assumptions, no scope drift Ready for Stage 2 (simulation-plan): determine exact replacement strings for L104, L105, L125 and the §1 module list entry 6 relabel form. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `rg -n "html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide" src/` (0 hits — confirms Codex r1 precision) - `rg -n "html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide" -S .` (only doc + .orchestrator hits — confirms external/reference status) - Read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L95-134 (§1 lens table + module list) - Read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L630-688 (§2.6 content_editor audit — G2 source) - Read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py` L60-170 (B-2 verification utility surface) - Read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_codex_r1.md` (Codex r1 final, FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES confirmed) - Read: `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_claude_r1.md` (Claude r1, scope-lock baseline) Files checked: - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (L95-134, L630-688) - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py` (L60-170) - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_codex_r1.md` - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\drafts\21_stage_problem-review_claude_r1.md` Verified facts: - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 currently lists `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` in B-1 "Phase Q 후보 파일" column - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 currently lists `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` in B-2 "Phase Q 후보 파일" column - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L125 currently lists `content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` in §1 module list entry 6 - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 (L630-688) flags both B-1 and B-2 `content_editor.py` mappings as (부정확) at L642-643 and surfaces G2 axis at L672 and L679 - `src/content_editor.py` contains only forward slot-fill helpers (`fill_content`, `_call_kei_editor_with_retry`, `fill_candidates`, `_parse_json`); 0 hits for `override_section` / `html_to_slide_mdx` / `reverse` - `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py` is the deterministic local B-2 verification utility (not the main reverse adapter); confirms Codex r1 precision - `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` has 0 source-file hits in `src/` — confirmed external (글벗 sibling repo per audit doc's 글벗 prefix) - No regression risk: scope is doc-only, single file, 3 token-level edits Test results: - Not run. Stage 1 = review only, no pytest by protocol. Commit: - None (Stage 1 = review draft, no edit committed).
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 11:44:13 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem review (Round 1)

I verified the root cause and scope-lock with local grep/find only. No missing files were found for the cited repo paths, and the issue is correctly doc-only.

Root cause verified:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104 lists B-1 candidate files as pipeline.py, content_editor.py.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:105 lists B-2 candidate files as fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:124 lists content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) in the module list. Minor verifier correction: the prior report cited line 125, but this checkout has the content_editor.py entry at line 124 and content_verifier.py at line 125.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:642-643, :672, and :679 already state the G2 catch: content_editor.py is inaccurately mapped to B-1/B-2 because B-1 is zone-section override / composition planner territory and B-2 is HTML-to-MDX reverse-path territory.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 cross-ref matches the same G2 finding.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:81 defines IMP-21 as doc-only correction of the inaccurate content_editor mapping, with no dependency.

Code verification:

  • B-1 implementation surface is in src/phase_z2_pipeline.py: _build_position_assignment_plan(... override_section_assignments ...) at :1488-1495, override handling at :1526, applied/skipped trace at :1703-1711, CLI parsing at :4893-4994.
  • B-2 verification helper surface is in src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py: reverse-path text comparison utility comments at :64-69, normalization for reverse path at :89-95, and B-2 reverse path meta-line filtering at :147-156.
  • src/content_editor.py inventory is slot-fill / Kei editor only: fill_content at :73, _call_kei_editor_with_retry at :290, fill_candidates at :335, _parse_json at :446.
  • rg found no override_section, html_to_slide_mdx, reverse path, or reverse_path symbols/usages in src/content_editor.py.

Scope-lock:

  • In scope: correct only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md section 1 lens entries for B-1/B-2 and the related module-list note so content_editor.py is no longer presented as a B-1/B-2 implementation file.
  • Out of scope: reassessing pipeline.py directness for B-1 (IMP-25), A-3/A-4 renderer.py mapping (IMP-22), A-3/A-4 html_generator.py mapping (IMP-23), runtime pipeline behavior, pytest, and any implementation code.

Stage 1 conclusion: Claude's root cause and scope-lock are accepted, with the minor line-number correction above. Proceed to Stage 2 planning for a narrowly scoped audit-doc edit.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • Get-Content -Raw -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt'
  • rg -n "content_editor\.py|B-1|B-2|html_to_slide_mdx|override_section_assignments|section_assignment_overrides|composition_planner_debug|fill_content|fill_candidates|_call_kei_editor_with_retry|_parse_json|reverse path|IMP-21|G2" -S docs src
  • git status --short
  • rg --files docs src | rg "PHASE-Q-AUDIT|PHASE-Q-INSIGHT|PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION|content_editor|phase_z2_pipeline|phase_z2_verification_utils|fmt_slide"
  • rg -n "\| \*\*B-1\*\*|\| \*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py \(B-1, B-2\)|G2\.|B-1 / B-2 column|content_editor 는 B-1|content_editor.py 모든 자산|§1 audit lens 표의 B-1 / B-2" docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`
  • rg -n "IMP-21|G2|content_editor 매핑 부정확|B-1 / B-2 column|content_editor .*B-1/B-2" docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md
  • rg -n "override_section_assignments|overrides = override_section_assignments|section_assignment_overrides_applied|section_assignment_overrides_skipped|composition_planner_debug|zone-section|html_to_slide_mdx|reverse" src\phase_z2_pipeline.py src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py src\content_editor.py
  • rg -n "def fill_content|def _call_kei_editor_with_retry|def fill_candidates|def _parse_json|override_section|html_to_slide_mdx|reverse path|reverse_path" src\content_editor.py
  • line-range reads with Get-Content for PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, content_editor.py, phase_z2_pipeline.py, and phase_z2_verification_utils.py
    Files checked:
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\content_editor.py
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_pipeline.py
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py
    Test results: Not run. Current stage explicitly says grep/find and NO pytest.
    Verified facts:
  • content_editor.py is currently mapped to B-1/B-2 in the audit lens and module list.
  • The audit's own G2 catch says that mapping is inaccurate.
  • B-1 override handling is in Phase Z pipeline / composition planner code, not content_editor.py.
  • B-2 reverse-path verification helpers are separate from content_editor.py; the main reverse path is documented as fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx.
  • content_editor.py contains Kei slot-fill/editor functions and no B-1/B-2 override or reverse-path implementation symbols.
  • IMP-21 is low-priority doc-only and should not touch unrelated axes.
    FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem review (Round 1) I verified the root cause and scope-lock with local grep/find only. No missing files were found for the cited repo paths, and the issue is correctly doc-only. Root cause verified: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104` lists B-1 candidate files as `pipeline.py`, `content_editor.py`. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:105` lists B-2 candidate files as `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, `content_editor.py`. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:124` lists `content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` in the module list. Minor verifier correction: the prior report cited line 125, but this checkout has the `content_editor.py` entry at line 124 and `content_verifier.py` at line 125. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:642-643`, `:672`, and `:679` already state the G2 catch: `content_editor.py` is inaccurately mapped to B-1/B-2 because B-1 is zone-section override / composition planner territory and B-2 is HTML-to-MDX reverse-path territory. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136` cross-ref matches the same G2 finding. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:81` defines IMP-21 as doc-only correction of the inaccurate `content_editor` mapping, with no dependency. Code verification: - B-1 implementation surface is in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`: `_build_position_assignment_plan(... override_section_assignments ...)` at `:1488-1495`, override handling at `:1526`, applied/skipped trace at `:1703-1711`, CLI parsing at `:4893-4994`. - B-2 verification helper surface is in `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py`: reverse-path text comparison utility comments at `:64-69`, normalization for reverse path at `:89-95`, and B-2 reverse path meta-line filtering at `:147-156`. - `src/content_editor.py` inventory is slot-fill / Kei editor only: `fill_content` at `:73`, `_call_kei_editor_with_retry` at `:290`, `fill_candidates` at `:335`, `_parse_json` at `:446`. - `rg` found no `override_section`, `html_to_slide_mdx`, `reverse path`, or `reverse_path` symbols/usages in `src/content_editor.py`. Scope-lock: - In scope: correct only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` section 1 lens entries for B-1/B-2 and the related module-list note so `content_editor.py` is no longer presented as a B-1/B-2 implementation file. - Out of scope: reassessing `pipeline.py` directness for B-1 (IMP-25), A-3/A-4 `renderer.py` mapping (IMP-22), A-3/A-4 `html_generator.py` mapping (IMP-23), runtime pipeline behavior, pytest, and any implementation code. Stage 1 conclusion: Claude's root cause and scope-lock are accepted, with the minor line-number correction above. Proceed to Stage 2 planning for a narrowly scoped audit-doc edit. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `Get-Content -Raw -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt'` - `rg -n "content_editor\.py|B-1|B-2|html_to_slide_mdx|override_section_assignments|section_assignment_overrides|composition_planner_debug|fill_content|fill_candidates|_call_kei_editor_with_retry|_parse_json|reverse path|IMP-21|G2" -S docs src` - `git status --short` - `rg --files docs src | rg "PHASE-Q-AUDIT|PHASE-Q-INSIGHT|PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION|content_editor|phase_z2_pipeline|phase_z2_verification_utils|fmt_slide"` - `rg -n "\| \*\*B-1\*\*|\| \*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py \(B-1, B-2\)|G2\.|B-1 / B-2 column|content_editor 는 B-1|content_editor.py` 모든 자산|§1 audit lens 표의 B-1 / B-2" docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `rg -n "IMP-21|G2|content_editor 매핑 부정확|B-1 / B-2 column|content_editor .*B-1/B-2" docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` - `rg -n "override_section_assignments|overrides = override_section_assignments|section_assignment_overrides_applied|section_assignment_overrides_skipped|composition_planner_debug|zone-section|html_to_slide_mdx|reverse" src\phase_z2_pipeline.py src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py src\content_editor.py` - `rg -n "def fill_content|def _call_kei_editor_with_retry|def fill_candidates|def _parse_json|override_section|html_to_slide_mdx|reverse path|reverse_path" src\content_editor.py` - line-range reads with `Get-Content` for `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, `content_editor.py`, `phase_z2_pipeline.py`, and `phase_z2_verification_utils.py` Files checked: - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\content_editor.py` - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_pipeline.py` - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_verification_utils.py` Test results: Not run. Current stage explicitly says grep/find and NO pytest. Verified facts: - `content_editor.py` is currently mapped to B-1/B-2 in the audit lens and module list. - The audit's own G2 catch says that mapping is inaccurate. - B-1 override handling is in Phase Z pipeline / composition planner code, not `content_editor.py`. - B-2 reverse-path verification helpers are separate from `content_editor.py`; the main reverse path is documented as `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. - `content_editor.py` contains Kei slot-fill/editor functions and no B-1/B-2 override or reverse-path implementation symbols. - IMP-21 is low-priority doc-only and should not touch unrelated axes. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 11:48:06 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

📌 [Claude #1] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 Round #1

■ Axis coverage checklist (issue body scope)

axis issue-body item plan coverage
1 content_editor.py 매핑 부정확 정정 u1 (L104 B-1 row + L105 B-2 row drop)
2 B-1 zone-section override = pipeline.py / composition planner 영역 (content_editor 아님) u1 L104 — pipeline.py 유지, content_editor.py 제거
3 B-2 HTML→MDX 역변환 = 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx (content_editor 아님) u1 L105 — 글벗 ref 유지, content_editor.py 제거
4 content_editor 는 block 안 slot 채우기 — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름 u1 L125 — module-list 의 (B-1, B-2) annotation 제거 (entry 자체는 §2.6 audit 근거로 유지)
5 audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) scope-lock = PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only, src/templates zero touch
6 cross-ref 정합 cross-ref doc PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 (G2 catch row) 는 catch record (역사적 기록) — IMP-21 lands 후에도 "이 catch 가 IMP-21 로 해결됨" 의미로 그대로 정합. 추가 sync edit 불필요. §2.6 G2 note (L642-643, L679) 도 별 axis 표현 그대로 정합.

전 axis 커버. 본문 scope-out: pipeline.py B-1 listing 정밀도 (→ IMP-25), 글벗 fmt_slide.py external-ref 정밀도 (별 axis), §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (변경 X), G3 AI repair fallback 평가 (별 axis), 코드 변경 zero.

■ Stage 1 unresolved Q resolution

  • Q1 (cross-ref sync): 불필요. G2 catch row 는 "발견된 catch" 기록이며 IMP-21 가 그 해결. doc-only correction landing 후에도 정합.
  • Q2 (L125 annotation): 단순 제거. forward pointer (e.g., (§2.6 audit)) 추가 안 함 — §2 list 의 entry 존재 자체가 §2.6 audit 근거를 함의. style 일관성 위해 minimal.
  • Q3 (commit style): IMP-21 standalone (1 commit = 1 decision unit, P5 audit-anchor-first-line regression guard 무관 — mid-doc edits).

■ Line-number note
Stage 1 exit report 는 L124 로 기재. 현 working tree HEAD (134f52d) 확인 시 module-list (B-1, B-2) 항목은 L125. Edit 은 string-match 기반이라 line drift 무관. 본 plan + Stage 3 Edit 은 L125 기준.

=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===

  • id: u1
    summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens B-1/B-2 row 와 §2 module-list 에서 content_editor.py 의 부정확한 매핑 제거 (3 single-line edits)
    files:
    • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
      tests: []
      estimate_lines: 3
      === END_IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===

■ u1 rationale (per-unit, ≤3 lines)

  • L104 (B-1 row): "Phase Q 후보 파일" cell 에서 , content_editor.py 제거. pipeline.py 만 남김.
  • L105 (B-2 row): "Phase Q 후보 파일" cell 에서 , content_editor.py 제거. 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx 만 남김.
  • L125 (§2 module-list): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)→content_editor.py(§2.6 audit 단독; §1 lens 미매핑) 같은 axis-free 표기 vs 단순 제거 → 결정:(B-1, B-2)annotation 만 제거하여content_editor.py` 만 남김 (entry 존재 자체가 §2.6 audit 근거 시그널, 다른 entry style 과 형평).

■ Test/verify strategy

  • doc-only diff — pytest 비대상. Stage 4 verify = git diff 검토 + grep 검증:
    • rg -n 'content_editor' docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md → L104/L105 미존재 확인, L125 axis-annotation 없는 entry 1 줄, §2.6 audit 본문 (L622+, L1115, L1161, L1215, L1219, L1343) + L11 § Why 보존.
    • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) 본문 변경 X 확인.
  • audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): doc top region (anchor 영역) 미수정 — L104/L105/L125 모두 mid-doc, anchor risk 없음. 별 가드 불필요.

■ Side effects / follow-up issue candidates

  • 없음. §2 list 의 content_editor.py entry 가 axis-annotation 없이 남는 점은 §2.6 audit 단독 cross-link 으로 합리화. 추후 §1 lens 정정 일괄 (G2 + I6/J5/K6/L5) merge 시 §2 list entry style 통일 고려 가능 (별 axis).

■ Rollback strategy

  • 단일 commit revert (git revert <sha>) 로 3 single-line 변경 동시 복구. files=1, lines=3 → revert 충돌 위험 zero.

■ Out-of-scope reaffirm

  • pipeline.py B-1 listing 정밀도 → IMP-25 (별 issue)
  • 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx external-ref 정밀도 → 별 axis
  • content_editor.py §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict → 변경 X
  • G3 AI repair fallback infra reuse 평가 → 별 axis
  • 코드 변경 zero (src/ 0 file, templates/ 0 file)

=== EVIDENCE ===

  • HEAD commit: 134f52d (feat(#58): L3 dormant trigger guard ...)
  • Read: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:95-131 confirmed L104 B-1 row text, L105 B-2 row text, L125 module-list entry content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)`.
  • Read: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:130-141 confirmed §4 G2 row (L136) 는 catch record — IMP-21 landing 후 정합 유지 (sync edit 불필요).
  • Grep: content_editor in PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md → L11/L104/L105/L125/L622/L642/L643/L647/L677/L679/L681/L687/L1115/L1161/L1215/L1219/L1343 — IMP-21 scope = L104/L105/L125 만, 나머지 (§2.6 audit 본문 + 누적 §1 정정 weight 기록 + Why 컨텍스트 + activity log) 보존.
  • Stage 1 exit report (claude_r1, claude_r2, codex_r1, codex_yes) — scope-lock 3 edit 합의 + cross-ref doc Q1 deferred to Stage 2.
  • Plan body 길이 — ~4.6k chars (< 5k cap), code snippet 0.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

📌 **[Claude #1] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 Round #1** ■ **Axis coverage checklist (issue body scope)** | axis | issue-body item | plan coverage | |---|---|---| | 1 | `content_editor.py` 매핑 부정확 정정 | u1 (L104 B-1 row + L105 B-2 row drop) | | 2 | B-1 zone-section override = `pipeline.py` / composition planner 영역 (content_editor 아님) | u1 L104 — `pipeline.py` 유지, `content_editor.py` 제거 | | 3 | B-2 HTML→MDX 역변환 = 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx` (content_editor 아님) | u1 L105 — 글벗 ref 유지, `content_editor.py` 제거 | | 4 | content_editor 는 *block 안 slot 채우기* — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름 | u1 L125 — module-list 의 `(B-1, B-2)` annotation 제거 (entry 자체는 §2.6 audit 근거로 유지) | | 5 | audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) | scope-lock = PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only, src/templates zero touch | | 6 | cross-ref 정합 | cross-ref doc `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136` (G2 catch row) 는 *catch record* (역사적 기록) — IMP-21 lands 후에도 "이 catch 가 IMP-21 로 해결됨" 의미로 그대로 정합. 추가 sync edit 불필요. §2.6 G2 note (L642-643, L679) 도 *별 axis* 표현 그대로 정합. | 전 axis 커버. 본문 scope-out: pipeline.py B-1 listing 정밀도 (→ IMP-25), 글벗 `fmt_slide.py` external-ref 정밀도 (별 axis), §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (변경 X), G3 AI repair fallback 평가 (별 axis), 코드 변경 zero. ■ **Stage 1 unresolved Q resolution** - Q1 (cross-ref sync): 불필요. G2 catch row 는 "발견된 catch" 기록이며 IMP-21 가 그 해결. doc-only correction landing 후에도 정합. - Q2 (L125 annotation): 단순 제거. forward pointer (e.g., `(§2.6 audit)`) 추가 안 함 — §2 list 의 entry 존재 자체가 §2.6 audit 근거를 함의. style 일관성 위해 minimal. - Q3 (commit style): IMP-21 standalone (1 commit = 1 decision unit, P5 audit-anchor-first-line regression guard 무관 — mid-doc edits). ■ **Line-number note** Stage 1 exit report 는 L124 로 기재. 현 working tree HEAD (134f52d) 확인 시 module-list `(B-1, B-2)` 항목은 **L125**. Edit 은 string-match 기반이라 line drift 무관. 본 plan + Stage 3 Edit 은 L125 기준. === IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === - id: u1 summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens B-1/B-2 row 와 §2 module-list 에서 content_editor.py 의 부정확한 매핑 제거 (3 single-line edits) files: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md tests: [] estimate_lines: 3 === END_IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === ■ **u1 rationale (per-unit, ≤3 lines)** - L104 (B-1 row): "Phase Q 후보 파일" cell 에서 `, content_editor.py` 제거. `pipeline.py` 만 남김. - L105 (B-2 row): "Phase Q 후보 파일" cell 에서 `, content_editor.py` 제거. 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` 만 남김. - L125 (§2 module-list): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2)` → `content_editor.py` (§2.6 audit 단독; §1 lens 미매핑) 같은 axis-free 표기 vs 단순 제거 → 결정: `(B-1, B-2)` annotation 만 제거하여 `content_editor.py` 만 남김 (entry 존재 자체가 §2.6 audit 근거 시그널, 다른 entry style 과 형평). ■ **Test/verify strategy** - doc-only diff — pytest 비대상. Stage 4 verify = git diff 검토 + grep 검증: - `rg -n 'content_editor' docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → L104/L105 미존재 확인, L125 axis-annotation 없는 entry 1 줄, §2.6 audit 본문 (L622+, L1115, L1161, L1215, L1219, L1343) + L11 § Why 보존. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) 본문 변경 X 확인. - audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): doc top region (anchor 영역) 미수정 — L104/L105/L125 모두 mid-doc, anchor risk 없음. 별 가드 불필요. ■ **Side effects / follow-up issue candidates** - 없음. §2 list 의 content_editor.py entry 가 axis-annotation 없이 남는 점은 §2.6 audit 단독 cross-link 으로 합리화. 추후 §1 lens 정정 일괄 (G2 + I6/J5/K6/L5) merge 시 §2 list entry style 통일 고려 가능 (별 axis). ■ **Rollback strategy** - 단일 commit revert (`git revert <sha>`) 로 3 single-line 변경 동시 복구. files=1, lines=3 → revert 충돌 위험 zero. ■ **Out-of-scope reaffirm** - pipeline.py B-1 listing 정밀도 → IMP-25 (별 issue) - 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` external-ref 정밀도 → 별 axis - content_editor.py §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict → 변경 X - G3 AI repair fallback infra reuse 평가 → 별 axis - 코드 변경 zero (src/ 0 file, templates/ 0 file) === EVIDENCE === - HEAD commit: 134f52d (`feat(#58): L3 dormant trigger guard ...`) - Read: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:95-131` confirmed L104 B-1 row text, L105 B-2 row text, L125 module-list entry `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2)`. - Read: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:130-141` confirmed §4 G2 row (L136) 는 catch record — IMP-21 landing 후 정합 유지 (sync edit 불필요). - Grep: `content_editor` in PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md → L11/L104/L105/L125/L622/L642/L643/L647/L677/L679/L681/L687/L1115/L1161/L1215/L1219/L1343 — IMP-21 scope = L104/L105/L125 만, 나머지 (§2.6 audit 본문 + 누적 §1 정정 weight 기록 + Why 컨텍스트 + activity log) 보존. - Stage 1 exit report (claude_r1, claude_r2, codex_r1, codex_yes) — scope-lock 3 edit 합의 + cross-ref doc Q1 deferred to Stage 2. - Plan body 길이 — ~4.6k chars (< 5k cap), code snippet 0. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 11:50:30 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan review

=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===

  • id: u1
    summary: Correct the PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md audit lens B-1/B-2 file mapping by removing the inaccurate content_editor.py association from the two rows and from the module-list axis annotation.
    files:
    • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
      tests:
    • pytest -q tests
      estimate_lines: 3
      === END_IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===

u1 rationale:

  • Covers all issue-body axes: B-1 stays pipeline/composition-planner territory, B-2 stays external html_to_slide_mdx territory, and content_editor remains slot-fill only.
  • Limits the edit to the audit doc lens correction; no src, template, or cross-ref rewrite is part of this unit.
  • The plan is one file and three expected line edits, so it is below the unit limits of 3 files and 50 lines.

Out-of-scope notes:

  • pipeline.py B-1 precision remains IMP-25.
  • External fmt_slide.py reference precision, content_editor Archive Candidate verdict, and AI repair fallback reuse are separate axes.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 is a catch record that already describes the same mismatch and does not need a synchronized Stage 3 edit for this issue.

Rollback strategy:

  • Revert only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md for u1 if the Stage 3 doc edit overreaches or changes another axis.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • rg -n "content_editor|B-1|B-2|IMP-21|G2" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md
  • rg -n "override_section|html_to_slide_mdx|fill_content|fill_candidates|_call_kei_editor_with_retry|_parse_json" src/content_editor.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.py src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py
  • line-window reads for PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, and PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md
  • pytest -q tests
    Files checked:
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md
  • src/content_editor.py
  • src/phase_z2_pipeline.py
  • src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py
    Test results:
  • pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 41.66s
    Verified facts:
  • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md still has content_editor.py co-listed on the B-1/B-2 lens rows and the module-list annotation; u1 targets exactly those stale doc mappings.
  • The content_editor.py symbols checked are slot-fill/editor helpers, while override_section_assignments is in phase_z2_pipeline.py; no content_editor.py html_to_slide_mdx reference was found.
  • IMP-21 backlog scope is doc-only audit lens correction with dependency none.
  • The Stage 2 implementation_units block exists, has one unit, touches 1 file, estimates 3 lines, and has no oversized unit.
    FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan review === IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === - id: u1 summary: Correct the PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md audit lens B-1/B-2 file mapping by removing the inaccurate content_editor.py association from the two rows and from the module-list axis annotation. files: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md tests: - pytest -q tests estimate_lines: 3 === END_IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === u1 rationale: - Covers all issue-body axes: B-1 stays pipeline/composition-planner territory, B-2 stays external html_to_slide_mdx territory, and content_editor remains slot-fill only. - Limits the edit to the audit doc lens correction; no src, template, or cross-ref rewrite is part of this unit. - The plan is one file and three expected line edits, so it is below the unit limits of 3 files and 50 lines. Out-of-scope notes: - pipeline.py B-1 precision remains IMP-25. - External fmt_slide.py reference precision, content_editor Archive Candidate verdict, and AI repair fallback reuse are separate axes. - PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 is a catch record that already describes the same mismatch and does not need a synchronized Stage 3 edit for this issue. Rollback strategy: - Revert only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md for u1 if the Stage 3 doc edit overreaches or changes another axis. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - git status --short - rg -n "content_editor|B-1|B-2|IMP-21|G2" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md - rg -n "override_section|html_to_slide_mdx|fill_content|fill_candidates|_call_kei_editor_with_retry|_parse_json" src/content_editor.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.py src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py - line-window reads for PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, and PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md - pytest -q tests Files checked: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md - docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md - src/content_editor.py - src/phase_z2_pipeline.py - src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py Test results: - pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 41.66s Verified facts: - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md still has content_editor.py co-listed on the B-1/B-2 lens rows and the module-list annotation; u1 targets exactly those stale doc mappings. - The content_editor.py symbols checked are slot-fill/editor helpers, while override_section_assignments is in phase_z2_pipeline.py; no content_editor.py html_to_slide_mdx reference was found. - IMP-21 backlog scope is doc-only audit lens correction with dependency none. - The Stage 2 implementation_units block exists, has one unit, touches 1 file, estimates 3 lines, and has no oversized unit. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 11:53:17 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Executing unit: u1

[Claude #3] Stage 3: 코드 수정 / 이슈 분기 Round #1 — unit u1 executed (doc-only).

■ unit_executed

  • id: u1
  • summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens B-1/B-2 row + §1 module-list axis annotation 에서 content_editor.py mis-mapping 제거.

■ files_changed

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md

■ diff_summary

  • 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — Stage 2 estimate_lines=3 정확 일치.
  • L104 (B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py`, `content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. pipeline.py 보존 (precision 은 IMP-25 axis).
  • L105 (B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, `content_editor.py` → 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. 외부 ref 토큰 보존 (external-ref precision = 별 axis).
  • L125 (§1 module-list, content_editor.py 행 axis 주석): 6. `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → 6. `content_editor.py`. Entry 자체는 보존 — §2.6 audit 대상이므로 module-list 에 남아야 함.

■ scope-lock 검증

  • 단일 파일 (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md) 만 수정. src/ / templates/ / 기타 docs 미수정.
  • pipeline.py 토큰 보존 (IMP-25 axis).
  • 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx 토큰 보존 (external-ref precision axis).
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 미수정 (Stage 2 결정: catch record 가 이미 동일 mismatch 기록 → 동기화 불필요).
  • §2.6 audit verdict (Archive Candidate, L642-643/L679) 미수정.
  • audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5) — 편집은 mid-doc (L101-130 구간), top anchor 미접근.
  • AI=0 (이번 unit 은 doc 정정, AI 호출 없음).

■ commit/push 상태

  • Stage 3 룰 준수: NOT committed, NOT pushed. Edit 만 적용. 다음 stage 가 commit 결정.

■ remaining_units

  • (empty) — Stage 2 IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS 에 u1 하나만 존재. 모든 unit 완료.

■ follow_up_issue_candidates

  • (none new) — scope-lock 외 axis 새로 발견된 것 없음. Stage 2 가 이미 follow_up_candidates 로 기록한 기존 항목:
    • IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision axis) — 이미 backlog.
    • External fmt_slide.py reference precision — 별 axis (현재 backlog 등재 여부 미상, 본 이슈 종결 후 별도 판단).
    • content_editor.py §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict / AI repair fallback (G3) — §2.6 후속.
    • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 catch record — 현재 sufficient.

=== EVIDENCE ===

  • commands run:
    • git diff --stat docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 6 +++--- / 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
    • git diff docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md → only L104 / L105 / L125 hunks; no other file touched.
  • files checked (read):
    • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-134 (§1 lens table + 모듈 리스트 컨텍스트 확인).
  • edits applied (Edit tool, sequential same-file per workflow_atomicity_rules):
    • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 (B-1 row): content_editor.py 토큰 제거.
    • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 (B-2 row): content_editor.py 토큰 제거.
    • PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L125 (module-list): (B-1, B-2) 주석 제거, entry 보존.
  • post-edit verification:
    • diff scope = 3 lines (matches Stage 2 estimate_lines=3 ceiling).
    • 0 src/, 0 templates/, 0 frontend file touched.
    • §2.6 G2 catch (L642-643, L679) factually 일관 유지: §1 lens 가 이제 §2.6 가 지적한 mismatch 를 반영.

rewind_target: (n/a — single-unit plan complete; awaiting Codex review)

FINAL_CONSENSUS: (Claude implementer — Codex review pending)

Executing unit: u1 [Claude #3] Stage 3: 코드 수정 / 이슈 분기 Round #1 — unit u1 executed (doc-only). ■ unit_executed - id: u1 - summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens B-1/B-2 row + §1 module-list axis annotation 에서 `content_editor.py` mis-mapping 제거. ■ files_changed - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md ■ diff_summary - 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — Stage 2 estimate_lines=3 정확 일치. - L104 (B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `` `pipeline.py`, `content_editor.py` `` → `` `pipeline.py` ``. `pipeline.py` 보존 (precision 은 IMP-25 axis). - L105 (B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `` 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, `content_editor.py` `` → `` 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` ``. 외부 ref 토큰 보존 (external-ref precision = 별 axis). - L125 (§1 module-list, content_editor.py 행 axis 주석): `` 6. `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) `` → `` 6. `content_editor.py` ``. Entry 자체는 보존 — §2.6 audit 대상이므로 module-list 에 남아야 함. ■ scope-lock 검증 - 단일 파일 (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`) 만 수정. `src/` / `templates/` / 기타 docs 미수정. - `pipeline.py` 토큰 보존 (IMP-25 axis). - `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` 토큰 보존 (external-ref precision axis). - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136` 미수정 (Stage 2 결정: catch record 가 이미 동일 mismatch 기록 → 동기화 불필요). - §2.6 audit verdict (Archive Candidate, L642-643/L679) 미수정. - audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5) — 편집은 mid-doc (L101-130 구간), top anchor 미접근. - AI=0 (이번 unit 은 doc 정정, AI 호출 없음). ■ commit/push 상태 - Stage 3 룰 준수: NOT committed, NOT pushed. Edit 만 적용. 다음 stage 가 commit 결정. ■ remaining_units - (empty) — Stage 2 IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS 에 u1 하나만 존재. 모든 unit 완료. ■ follow_up_issue_candidates - (none new) — scope-lock 외 axis 새로 발견된 것 없음. Stage 2 가 이미 follow_up_candidates 로 기록한 기존 항목: - IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision axis) — 이미 backlog. - External fmt_slide.py reference precision — 별 axis (현재 backlog 등재 여부 미상, 본 이슈 종결 후 별도 판단). - content_editor.py §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict / AI repair fallback (G3) — §2.6 후속. - PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 catch record — 현재 sufficient. === EVIDENCE === - commands run: - `git diff --stat docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → ` docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 6 +++---` / `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - `git diff docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → only L104 / L105 / L125 hunks; no other file touched. - files checked (read): - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L95-134 (§1 lens table + 모듈 리스트 컨텍스트 확인). - edits applied (Edit tool, sequential same-file per workflow_atomicity_rules): - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 (B-1 row): `content_editor.py` 토큰 제거. - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 (B-2 row): `content_editor.py` 토큰 제거. - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L125 (module-list): `(B-1, B-2)` 주석 제거, entry 보존. - post-edit verification: - diff scope = 3 lines (matches Stage 2 estimate_lines=3 ceiling). - 0 src/, 0 templates/, 0 frontend file touched. - §2.6 G2 catch (L642-643, L679) factually 일관 유지: §1 lens 가 이제 §2.6 가 지적한 mismatch 를 반영. rewind_target: (n/a — single-unit plan complete; awaiting Codex review) FINAL_CONSENSUS: (Claude implementer — Codex review pending)
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 11:54:43 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #1]

Stage 3 code-edit verification for unit u1 is complete.

unit_verified

  • id: u1
  • result: correct
  • scope: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only

Verification result:

  • The B-1 row now maps only to pipeline.py; content_editor.py was removed from that row while preserving the pipeline.py token for the IMP-25 axis.
  • The B-2 row now maps only to external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx; content_editor.py was removed from that row while preserving the external reference token.
  • The module-list entry for content_editor.py remains present, but the (B-1, B-2) axis annotation was removed.
  • The tracked diff is limited to docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • The diff is exactly 3 line edits: 3 insertions and 3 deletions.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend, or cross-reference doc file is touched in the tracked diff.
  • The existing section 2.6 G2 note remains aligned with the corrected section 1 lens: it still records that the prior B-1/B-2 mapping to content_editor.py was inaccurate.

No tests were run for this Stage 3 verifier pass. The current stage instruction says not to run full pytest unless explicitly required, and this pass is verifying the single executed doc-only unit.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • PowerShell line-window read for docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md lines 95-130
  • PowerShell line-window read for docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md lines 636-682
  • git diff --name-only
    Files checked:
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
    Verified facts:
  • git diff --name-only reports only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md as the tracked changed file.
  • git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md reports 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • The B-1 lens row contains pipeline.py and no content_editor.py.
  • The B-2 lens row contains external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx and no content_editor.py.
  • The module-list entry contains content_editor.py without (B-1, B-2).
  • The G2 catch note in section 2.6 remains present and factually consistent with the corrected lens.
    Remaining units: none
    FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #1] Stage 3 code-edit verification for unit u1 is complete. unit_verified - id: u1 - result: correct - scope: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only Verification result: - The B-1 row now maps only to `pipeline.py`; `content_editor.py` was removed from that row while preserving the `pipeline.py` token for the IMP-25 axis. - The B-2 row now maps only to external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`; `content_editor.py` was removed from that row while preserving the external reference token. - The module-list entry for `content_editor.py` remains present, but the `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation was removed. - The tracked diff is limited to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - The diff is exactly 3 line edits: 3 insertions and 3 deletions. - No `src/`, `templates/`, frontend, or cross-reference doc file is touched in the tracked diff. - The existing section 2.6 G2 note remains aligned with the corrected section 1 lens: it still records that the prior B-1/B-2 mapping to `content_editor.py` was inaccurate. No tests were run for this Stage 3 verifier pass. The current stage instruction says not to run full pytest unless explicitly required, and this pass is verifying the single executed doc-only unit. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - PowerShell line-window read for `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` lines 95-130 - PowerShell line-window read for `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` lines 636-682 - `git diff --name-only` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` Verified facts: - `git diff --name-only` reports only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` as the tracked changed file. - `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` reports `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - The B-1 lens row contains `pipeline.py` and no `content_editor.py`. - The B-2 lens row contains external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` and no `content_editor.py`. - The module-list entry contains `content_editor.py` without `(B-1, B-2)`. - The G2 catch note in section 2.6 remains present and factually consistent with the corrected lens. Remaining units: none FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 11:58:26 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #3] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1

Verification Summary

Stage 3 edit verified — diff exactly matches the Stage 2 / Stage 3 binding contract.

Diff scope (verified):

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only — 1 file, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
  • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py ✅
  • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx ✅
  • L125 (§2 module-list axis annotation, item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py ✅ (Stage 1 referenced L124; actual edit landed on L125 — content correctness unchanged, off-by-one in earlier line ref)
  • No src/ / templates/ / frontend/ touched

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • pipeline.py token preserved in B-1 row → IMP-25 axis untouched ✅
  • 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx token preserved in B-2 row → external-ref-precision axis untouched ✅
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) preserved as historical catch record — describes the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes, serving as audit trail ✅
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md §4 G2 catch (L136) preserved as historical catch record ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests):

  • 337 passed in 40.91s ✅
  • Matches Stage 2 baseline (337 passed) — no regression
  • Doc-only edit, no code paths affected

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction
  • No MDX sample, no template, no code-level change
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered

Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):

  • Single-file scope-lock: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only
  • estimate_lines ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact)
  • 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback)
  • audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5) → N/A (edits are mid-doc, no anchor surface)
  • workflow_atomicity_rules → same-file Edit sequential honored

Verdict

PASS — Stage 3 edit matches binding contract, baseline tests green (337 passed), all cross-axis isolation guardrails honored, no regressions. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push).

=== EVIDENCE ===

commands_run:
  - git status --short
  - git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  - git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  - git rev-parse HEAD
  - python -m pytest -q tests

files_checked:
  - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree, modified)
  - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L635-689 (§2.6 G2 note alignment)
  - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-141 (§4 G2 catch record alignment)

verified_facts:
  diff_stat:
    files_changed: 1
    insertions: 3
    deletions: 3
  diff_locations:
    L104: "B-1 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, pipeline.py preserved"
    L105: "B-2 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved"
    L125: "§2 module-list axis annotation (B-1, B-2) removed from content_editor.py entry (Stage 1 ref = L124, actual = L125, content correctness unchanged)"
  src_touched: false
  templates_touched: false
  frontend_touched: false
  cross_reference_doc_touched: false
  pytest_result: "337 passed in 40.91s"
  pytest_baseline_match: true (Stage 2 baseline = 337 passed)
  pipeline_py_preserved: true (B-1 row, IMP-25 axis isolation)
  external_fmt_slide_preserved: true (B-2 row, external-ref axis isolation)
  paragraph_2_6_g2_note_intact: true (L642-643, L679 — historical catch record)
  cross_ref_g2_catch_intact: true (PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 — historical catch record)

baseline_commit_sha: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1
working_tree: modified (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md staged-for-commit)

source_comment_ids:
  - Claude r1 (Stage 1 problem review, Round 1 + Round 2)
  - Codex r1 (Stage 1 precision note — phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split)
  - Claude r2 (Stage 2 simulation-plan)
  - Codex r1 (Stage 2 simulation-plan review, YES)
  - Claude r3 (Stage 3 code-edit)
  - Codex r1 (Stage 3 verification — tracked diff bounded)

=== END EVIDENCE ===

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

## [Claude #3] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 ### Verification Summary Stage 3 edit verified — diff exactly matches the Stage 2 / Stage 3 binding contract. **Diff scope (verified):** - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only — 1 file, 3 insertions, 3 deletions - L104 (§1 lens B-1 row): `pipeline.py`, `content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py` ✅ - L105 (§1 lens B-2 row): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, `content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` ✅ - L125 (§2 module-list axis annotation, item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py` ✅ (Stage 1 referenced L124; actual edit landed on L125 — content correctness unchanged, off-by-one in earlier line ref) - No `src/` / `templates/` / `frontend/` touched **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - `pipeline.py` token preserved in B-1 row → IMP-25 axis untouched ✅ - `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` token preserved in B-2 row → external-ref-precision axis untouched ✅ - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) preserved as historical catch record — describes the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes, serving as audit trail ✅ - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` §4 G2 catch (L136) preserved as historical catch record ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests):** - 337 passed in 40.91s ✅ - Matches Stage 2 baseline (337 passed) — no regression - Doc-only edit, no code paths affected **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction - No MDX sample, no template, no code-level change - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered **Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):** - Single-file scope-lock: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only - `estimate_lines` ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact) - 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback) - audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5) → N/A (edits are mid-doc, no anchor surface) - workflow_atomicity_rules → same-file Edit sequential honored ### Verdict **PASS** — Stage 3 edit matches binding contract, baseline tests green (337 passed), all cross-axis isolation guardrails honored, no regressions. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push). ``` === EVIDENCE === commands_run: - git status --short - git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - git rev-parse HEAD - python -m pytest -q tests files_checked: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree, modified) - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L635-689 (§2.6 G2 note alignment) - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-141 (§4 G2 catch record alignment) verified_facts: diff_stat: files_changed: 1 insertions: 3 deletions: 3 diff_locations: L104: "B-1 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, pipeline.py preserved" L105: "B-2 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved" L125: "§2 module-list axis annotation (B-1, B-2) removed from content_editor.py entry (Stage 1 ref = L124, actual = L125, content correctness unchanged)" src_touched: false templates_touched: false frontend_touched: false cross_reference_doc_touched: false pytest_result: "337 passed in 40.91s" pytest_baseline_match: true (Stage 2 baseline = 337 passed) pipeline_py_preserved: true (B-1 row, IMP-25 axis isolation) external_fmt_slide_preserved: true (B-2 row, external-ref axis isolation) paragraph_2_6_g2_note_intact: true (L642-643, L679 — historical catch record) cross_ref_g2_catch_intact: true (PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 — historical catch record) baseline_commit_sha: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 working_tree: modified (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md staged-for-commit) source_comment_ids: - Claude r1 (Stage 1 problem review, Round 1 + Round 2) - Codex r1 (Stage 1 precision note — phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split) - Claude r2 (Stage 2 simulation-plan) - Codex r1 (Stage 2 simulation-plan review, YES) - Claude r3 (Stage 3 code-edit) - Codex r1 (Stage 3 verification — tracked diff bounded) === END EVIDENCE === ``` FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:01:27 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #1] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1

Verification Summary

I independently verified the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the binding contract.

Diff scope:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md is the only tracked modified file.
  • The diff is exactly 1 file, 3 insertions, 3 deletions.
  • The B-1 row now lists only pipeline.py; content_editor.py was removed.
  • The B-2 row now lists only the external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx reference; content_editor.py was removed.
  • The module-list entry keeps content_editor.py but removes the inaccurate (B-1, B-2) annotation.

Cross-axis isolation:

  • pipeline.py remains preserved in the B-1 row, so the IMP-25 axis was not changed.
  • The external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx token remains preserved in the B-2 row.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md was not modified and still records the G2 catch as historical cross-reference context.
  • No src/, templates/, or frontend files are in the tracked diff.

Regression check:

  • pytest -q tests passed: 337 passed in 40.77s.

Verdict: PASS. The edit matches the Stage 2/3 contract, the required regression suite is green, and the tracked diff is scope-locked to the audit doc.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • Get-Content line-window checks for docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md lines 96-130 and 636-683
  • Get-Content line-window check for docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md lines 131-142
  • git diff --name-only
  • pytest -q tests

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md

Test results:

  • 337 passed in 40.77s

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD before commit is 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • Tracked diff name-only output is only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • Diff stat is 1 file changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions.
  • B-1 row contains pipeline.py and no longer contains content_editor.py.
  • B-2 row contains external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx and no longer contains content_editor.py.
  • Module-list item keeps content_editor.py and removes the (B-1, B-2) annotation.
  • pipeline.py and external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx tokens were preserved.
  • The G2 cross-reference in PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md remains untouched.
  • No tracked src/, templates/, or frontend files were modified.
    FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
## [Codex #1] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 ### Verification Summary I independently verified the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the binding contract. Diff scope: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` is the only tracked modified file. - The diff is exactly 1 file, 3 insertions, 3 deletions. - The B-1 row now lists only `pipeline.py`; `content_editor.py` was removed. - The B-2 row now lists only the external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` reference; `content_editor.py` was removed. - The module-list entry keeps `content_editor.py` but removes the inaccurate `(B-1, B-2)` annotation. Cross-axis isolation: - `pipeline.py` remains preserved in the B-1 row, so the IMP-25 axis was not changed. - The external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` token remains preserved in the B-2 row. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` was not modified and still records the G2 catch as historical cross-reference context. - No `src/`, `templates/`, or frontend files are in the tracked diff. Regression check: - `pytest -q tests` passed: 337 passed in 40.77s. Verdict: PASS. The edit matches the Stage 2/3 contract, the required regression suite is green, and the tracked diff is scope-locked to the audit doc. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `Get-Content` line-window checks for `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` lines 96-130 and 636-683 - `Get-Content` line-window check for `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` lines 131-142 - `git diff --name-only` - `pytest -q tests` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` Test results: - `337 passed in 40.77s` Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD before commit is `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - Tracked diff name-only output is only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - Diff stat is 1 file changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions. - B-1 row contains `pipeline.py` and no longer contains `content_editor.py`. - B-2 row contains external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` and no longer contains `content_editor.py`. - Module-list item keeps `content_editor.py` and removes the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation. - `pipeline.py` and external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` tokens were preserved. - The G2 cross-reference in `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` remains untouched. - No tracked `src/`, `templates/`, or frontend files were modified. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:03:54 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #4] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2

Verification Summary

Independent Round #2 re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2 binding contract. Round #1 (Claude #3 + Codex #1) both PASS — this round re-runs the checks from scratch.

Tracked diff (verified, fresh inspection):

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md is the only tracked modified file (git diff --name-only → single entry).
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py only. pipeline.py token preserved.
  • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx only. External-ref token preserved.
  • L125 (§2 module-list, item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or cross-reference doc touched.

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis: pipeline.py token in B-1 row preserved. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis: 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx token in B-2 row preserved. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) preserved verbatim — corrected §1 lens is now consistent with the catch record (which describes the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes). ✅
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) untouched and still aligned. ✅
  • Other catch records in INSIGHT-MAP (L82, L100, L107, L108, L122, L140, L152) referencing B-1/B-2 untouched and remain consistent. ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests):

  • 337 passed in 41.18s ✅
  • Matches Stage 2 baseline (337) and Round #1 result (337) — no regression introduced.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered.

Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):

  • Single-file scope-lock: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • estimate_lines ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact match).
  • 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback).
  • audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): N/A (edits at L104-L125 are mid-doc, no anchor surface).
  • workflow_atomicity_rules: same-file Edit sequential honored.

Round #1 reconcile:

  • Claude #3 noted line ref drift (Stage 1 referenced L124 / actual L125) — content correctness unchanged; off-by-one in early line ref does not invalidate the binding contract. Round #2 confirms L125 is the correct edit site for the module-list axis annotation.
  • Codex #1 confirmed identical diff scope and 337-pass test result.

Verdict

PASS — Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly, baseline tests green (337 passed), cross-axis isolation guardrails honored, no regressions, no hardcoding surface. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push).

=== EVIDENCE ===

commands_run:
  - git status --short
  - git diff --name-only
  - git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  - git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  - git rev-parse HEAD
  - python -m pytest -q tests
  - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L100-134 (§1 lens table + §2 module-list)
  - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L635-684 (§2.6 G2 note alignment)
  - grep "content_editor" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (40-line scope)
  - grep "content_editor|B-1|B-2" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (20-line scope)

files_checked:
  - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree modified)
  - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (untouched cross-ref)

baseline_head: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1

verified_facts:
  diff_stat:
    files_changed: 1
    insertions: 3
    deletions: 3
  diff_locations:
    L104: "B-1 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, pipeline.py preserved"
    L105: "B-2 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved"
    L125: "§2 module-list item 6 — (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed; content_editor.py entry retained"
  preserved_tokens:
    - pipeline.py (B-1 row, IMP-25 axis)
    - 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx (B-2 row, external-ref axis)
  unmodified_records:
    - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 G2 note (L642-643, L677, L679)
    - PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 §4 G2 catch
    - All other INSIGHT-MAP B-1/B-2 records (L82, L100, L107, L108, L122, L140, L152)
  test_result: "337 passed in 41.18s"
  src_touched: false
  templates_touched: false
  frontend_touched: false
  cross_reference_doc_touched: false

source_comment_ids:
  - claude_r1 (Stage 1 problem review, Round 1 + Round 2)
  - codex_r1 (Stage 1 precision note: phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split)
  - codex_r1 (Stage 3 verification)
  - claude_r3 (Stage 4 test-verify Round #1)
  - codex_r1 (Stage 4 test-verify Round #1)

commit_sha: pending (Stage 5 will produce)
## [Claude #4] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2 ### Verification Summary Independent Round #2 re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2 binding contract. Round #1 (Claude #3 + Codex #1) both PASS — this round re-runs the checks from scratch. **Tracked diff (verified, fresh inspection):** - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` is the only tracked modified file (`git diff --name-only` → single entry). - `git diff --stat` → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py`, `content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py` only. `pipeline.py` token preserved. - L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, `content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` only. External-ref token preserved. - L125 (§2 module-list, item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or cross-reference doc touched. **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis: `pipeline.py` token in B-1 row preserved. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis: `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` token in B-2 row preserved. ✅ - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) preserved verbatim — corrected §1 lens is now consistent with the catch record (which describes the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes). ✅ - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) untouched and still aligned. ✅ - Other catch records in INSIGHT-MAP (L82, L100, L107, L108, L122, L140, L152) referencing B-1/B-2 untouched and remain consistent. ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests):** - 337 passed in 41.18s ✅ - Matches Stage 2 baseline (337) and Round #1 result (337) — no regression introduced. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered. **Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):** - Single-file scope-lock: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - `estimate_lines` ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact match). - 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback). - audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): N/A (edits at L104-L125 are mid-doc, no anchor surface). - workflow_atomicity_rules: same-file Edit sequential honored. **Round #1 reconcile:** - Claude #3 noted line ref drift (Stage 1 referenced L124 / actual L125) — content correctness unchanged; off-by-one in early line ref does not invalidate the binding contract. Round #2 confirms L125 is the correct edit site for the module-list axis annotation. - Codex #1 confirmed identical diff scope and 337-pass test result. ### Verdict **PASS** — Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly, baseline tests green (337 passed), cross-axis isolation guardrails honored, no regressions, no hardcoding surface. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push). ``` === EVIDENCE === commands_run: - git status --short - git diff --name-only - git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - git rev-parse HEAD - python -m pytest -q tests - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L100-134 (§1 lens table + §2 module-list) - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L635-684 (§2.6 G2 note alignment) - grep "content_editor" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (40-line scope) - grep "content_editor|B-1|B-2" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (20-line scope) files_checked: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree modified) - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (untouched cross-ref) baseline_head: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 verified_facts: diff_stat: files_changed: 1 insertions: 3 deletions: 3 diff_locations: L104: "B-1 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, pipeline.py preserved" L105: "B-2 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved" L125: "§2 module-list item 6 — (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed; content_editor.py entry retained" preserved_tokens: - pipeline.py (B-1 row, IMP-25 axis) - 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx (B-2 row, external-ref axis) unmodified_records: - PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 G2 note (L642-643, L677, L679) - PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 §4 G2 catch - All other INSIGHT-MAP B-1/B-2 records (L82, L100, L107, L108, L122, L140, L152) test_result: "337 passed in 41.18s" src_touched: false templates_touched: false frontend_touched: false cross_reference_doc_touched: false source_comment_ids: - claude_r1 (Stage 1 problem review, Round 1 + Round 2) - codex_r1 (Stage 1 precision note: phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split) - codex_r1 (Stage 3 verification) - claude_r3 (Stage 4 test-verify Round #1) - codex_r1 (Stage 4 test-verify Round #1) commit_sha: pending (Stage 5 will produce) ```
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:18:13 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #5] Stage 4 test-verify Round #3

Verification Summary

Independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2 binding contract. Round #1 (Claude #3 / Codex #1) and Round #2 (Claude #4) both PASS — this round re-runs the checks from scratch and surfaces an environmental caveat.

Tracked diff (verified, fresh inspection):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry)
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py only. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis untouched).
  • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx only. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis untouched).
  • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or cross-reference doc touched.

File content re-read (post-edit state):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract exactly.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) preserved verbatim — describes the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes, serving as audit trail.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim and remains aligned with the corrected §1 lens.

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision): not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py): not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record: preserved. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref catch (L136): preserved. ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local session result: 300 passed, 2 warnings, 37 errors in ~19s.
  • All 37 errors are setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User' (verified by isolating tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts — fails at tmp_path fixture setup, never reaches test body).
  • 300 passed + 37 errors = 337 total tests collected — matches Round #1 (Codex #1: 337 passed) and Round #2 (Claude #4: 337 passed) collection counts exactly.
  • Persists with TMP/TEMP/TMPDIR overridden to D:\tmp and with sandbox disabled. git stash also blocked by .git/index.lock permission denial. → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock on %TEMP% + git index, NOT a regression from the doc edit.
  • A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path fixture PermissionError. Functional regression impossible.
  • Round #1 / Round #2 ran in clean environments and confirmed 337 passed in ~41s. Treating those as the binding regression baseline.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered.

Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):

  • Single-file scope-lock: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • estimate_lines ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact match).
  • 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback).
  • audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): N/A (edits at L104-L125 are mid-doc, no anchor surface).
  • workflow_atomicity_rules: same-file Edit sequential honored.

Verdict

PASS — Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly. Diff scope-locked, cross-axis isolation honored, content correctness verified by direct file read. Regression baseline confirmed by Round #1 / Round #2 (337 passed); my local session hit environmental PermissionError on %TEMP% + .git/index.lock (300 passed + 37 setup-level errors = 337 collected — same total), which cannot be caused by a markdown doc edit. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push).

=== EVIDENCE ===

commands_run:
  - git status --short
  - git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  - git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  - git rev-parse HEAD
  - git diff --name-only
  - python -m pytest -q tests (initial)
  - python -m pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts (error-type isolation)
  - $env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; python -m pytest -q tests (TMP override attempt)
  - python -m pytest -q tests (dangerouslyDisableSandbox=true; same env errors)
  - git stash push -m "imp21_stage4_verify_stash" -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (blocked by .git/index.lock permission denied)
  - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L100-134 (§1 lens table + §2 module list)
  - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L635-689 (§2.6 G2 note alignment)
  - Read PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L128-145 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch alignment)

files_checked:
  - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree, modified)
  - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (untouched, cross-ref alignment)

verified_facts:
  baseline_head: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1
  diff_stat:
    files_changed: 1
    insertions: 3
    deletions: 3
  diff_locations:
    L104: "B-1 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, pipeline.py preserved"
    L105: "B-2 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved"
    L125: "§2 module-list axis annotation (B-1, B-2) removed from content_editor.py entry"
  post_edit_file_state:
    L104_text: "| **B-1** | Zone-section assignment override | ... | `pipeline.py` | 중 |"
    L105_text: "| **B-2** | Edited HTML → MDX 역변환 | ... | 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` | 중 |"
    L125_text: "6. `content_editor.py`"
  cross_ref_state:
    PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP_L136: "untouched; G2 catch record still aligned with corrected §1 lens"
    PHASE-Q-AUDIT_§2.6_G2_note_L642-643_L679: "preserved verbatim as historical catch record"
  test_run_local:
    passed: 300
    skipped: 0
    errors: 37
    error_type: "PermissionError [WinError 5] on C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User (fixture setup, pre-test-body)"
    collected_total: 337
  test_run_round1_codex: 337 passed in 40.77s
  test_run_round1_claude: 337 passed in 40.91s
  test_run_round2_claude: 337 passed in 41.18s
  environmental_caveat: "Local Windows session has permission lock on %TEMP% + .git/index — affects all temp-dir-using tests + git index writes. Persists with TMP override + sandbox disable. Cannot be caused by markdown doc edit. Round #1 / Round #2 clean baselines (337 passed) treated as binding."

source_comment_ids:
  - Claude r1: Stage 1 problem review (Round 1 + Round 2)
  - Codex r1: Stage 1 precision note (phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split)
  - Claude r1: Stage 2 simulation plan
  - Codex r1: Stage 2 simulation plan YES
  - Claude #3 / Codex #1 / Claude #4: Stage 4 Round #1 + Round #2 verifications (337 passed baseline)

commit_sha: pending (Stage 5 will produce)
## [Claude #5] Stage 4 test-verify Round #3 ### Verification Summary Independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2 binding contract. Round #1 (Claude #3 / Codex #1) and Round #2 (Claude #4) both PASS — this round re-runs the checks from scratch and surfaces an environmental caveat. **Tracked diff (verified, fresh inspection):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry) - `git diff --stat` → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) - L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py`, `content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py` only. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis untouched). - L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, `content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` only. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis untouched). - L125 (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or cross-reference doc touched. **File content re-read (post-edit state):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract exactly. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L679) preserved verbatim — describes the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes, serving as audit trail. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim and remains aligned with the corrected §1 lens. **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision): not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py): not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record: preserved. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref catch (L136): preserved. ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local session result: `300 passed, 2 warnings, 37 errors in ~19s`. - All 37 errors are setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User'` (verified by isolating `tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` — fails at `tmp_path` fixture setup, never reaches test body). - `300 passed + 37 errors = 337 total tests collected` — matches Round #1 (Codex #1: 337 passed) and Round #2 (Claude #4: 337 passed) collection counts exactly. - Persists with `TMP/TEMP/TMPDIR` overridden to `D:\tmp` and with sandbox disabled. `git stash` also blocked by `.git/index.lock` permission denial. → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock on `%TEMP%` + git index, NOT a regression from the doc edit. - A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` fixture `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible. - Round #1 / Round #2 ran in clean environments and confirmed 337 passed in ~41s. Treating those as the binding regression baseline. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered. **Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):** - Single-file scope-lock: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - `estimate_lines` ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact match). - 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback). - audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): N/A (edits at L104-L125 are mid-doc, no anchor surface). - workflow_atomicity_rules: same-file Edit sequential honored. ### Verdict **PASS** — Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly. Diff scope-locked, cross-axis isolation honored, content correctness verified by direct file read. Regression baseline confirmed by Round #1 / Round #2 (337 passed); my local session hit environmental `PermissionError` on `%TEMP%` + `.git/index.lock` (300 passed + 37 setup-level errors = 337 collected — same total), which cannot be caused by a markdown doc edit. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push). ``` === EVIDENCE === commands_run: - git status --short - git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - git rev-parse HEAD - git diff --name-only - python -m pytest -q tests (initial) - python -m pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts (error-type isolation) - $env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; python -m pytest -q tests (TMP override attempt) - python -m pytest -q tests (dangerouslyDisableSandbox=true; same env errors) - git stash push -m "imp21_stage4_verify_stash" -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (blocked by .git/index.lock permission denied) - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L100-134 (§1 lens table + §2 module list) - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L635-689 (§2.6 G2 note alignment) - Read PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L128-145 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch alignment) files_checked: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree, modified) - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (untouched, cross-ref alignment) verified_facts: baseline_head: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 diff_stat: files_changed: 1 insertions: 3 deletions: 3 diff_locations: L104: "B-1 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, pipeline.py preserved" L105: "B-2 row column corrected — content_editor.py token removed, 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved" L125: "§2 module-list axis annotation (B-1, B-2) removed from content_editor.py entry" post_edit_file_state: L104_text: "| **B-1** | Zone-section assignment override | ... | `pipeline.py` | 중 |" L105_text: "| **B-2** | Edited HTML → MDX 역변환 | ... | 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` | 중 |" L125_text: "6. `content_editor.py`" cross_ref_state: PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP_L136: "untouched; G2 catch record still aligned with corrected §1 lens" PHASE-Q-AUDIT_§2.6_G2_note_L642-643_L679: "preserved verbatim as historical catch record" test_run_local: passed: 300 skipped: 0 errors: 37 error_type: "PermissionError [WinError 5] on C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User (fixture setup, pre-test-body)" collected_total: 337 test_run_round1_codex: 337 passed in 40.77s test_run_round1_claude: 337 passed in 40.91s test_run_round2_claude: 337 passed in 41.18s environmental_caveat: "Local Windows session has permission lock on %TEMP% + .git/index — affects all temp-dir-using tests + git index writes. Persists with TMP override + sandbox disable. Cannot be caused by markdown doc edit. Round #1 / Round #2 clean baselines (337 passed) treated as binding." source_comment_ids: - Claude r1: Stage 1 problem review (Round 1 + Round 2) - Codex r1: Stage 1 precision note (phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split) - Claude r1: Stage 2 simulation plan - Codex r1: Stage 2 simulation plan YES - Claude #3 / Codex #1 / Claude #4: Stage 4 Round #1 + Round #2 verifications (337 passed baseline) commit_sha: pending (Stage 5 will produce) ```
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:40:39 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #6] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. In this current round, Codex #1 already returned FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES with 337 passed in 40.77s. This Round #2 re-runs the checks from scratch and surfaces an environmental caveat from the local test session.

Tracked diff (re-inspected):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation).
  • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation).
  • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.

File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L636-685):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642 B-1 row, L643 B-2 row, L679 G2 entry) preserved verbatim — historical record of the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes (audit trail).
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens.

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #2 session: 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 21.64s.
  • All 31 errors verified as setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User'. Isolated tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts → fails at pytest_asyncio / tmp_path fixture setup with the same PermissionError; never reaches test body.
  • Persists even with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp (pytest still resolves C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User internally) + .pytest_cache writes also blocked. → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock, NOT a regression from the doc edit.
  • Collection count 300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (337 passed in 40.77s) and prior round Claude #5 collection — same collection, no missing/added tests.
  • A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path / pytest_asyncio fixture PermissionError. Functional regression impossible from this scope. Codex #1 Round #1 (337 passed in 40.77s, clean env) is the binding regression baseline for this round.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, code path, or sample-specific value touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not at risk.

Workflow / governance:

  • RULE 4 (commit scope) — single file, scope-lock matches Stage 2 binding contract.
  • RULE 11 (checkpoint) — Stage 2 IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS u1 (estimate_lines: 3) matches actual diff (3 ins / 3 del).
  • RULE 13 (anchor sync) — §2.6 G2 catch + INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 catch both preserved verbatim, no anchor drift.

Verdict: PASS. The edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly. Tracked diff is scope-locked to docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md with 3 ins / 3 del. Cross-axis isolation honored. Codex #1 Round #1 already validated regression suite green (337 passed in 40.77s) in clean environment; local Round #2 environmental PermissionError is unrelated to this doc edit.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-130 (§1 lens table + module-list)
  • Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L636-685 (§2.6 G2 note + Salvage Plan)
  • Read PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-144 (§4 G2 cross-ref)
  • git diff --name-only
  • python -m pytest -q tests (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP=D:\tmp override)
  • python -m pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts (single-test isolation)

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md

Test results:

  • Codex #1 Round #1 binding baseline (clean env): 337 passed in 40.77s.
  • Local Round #2 session: 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 21.64s — 31 errors all environmental PermissionError at tmp_path / .pytest_cache setup (C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User), confirmed via single-test isolation (test_discover_counts fails at fixture setup, never reaches test body). Collection count 337 matches baseline.

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • Tracked diff name-only: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry).
  • Diff stat: 1 file, 3 insertions, 3 deletions.
  • L104 B-1 row contains pipeline.py, no content_editor.py.
  • L105 B-2 row contains external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, no content_editor.py.
  • L125 module-list item 6 = content_editor.py (entry kept, (B-1, B-2) annotation removed).
  • pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis untouched).
  • External 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx token preserved (external-ref axis untouched).
  • §2.6 G2 note L642-643, L679 — preserved verbatim.
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 catch L136 — preserved verbatim.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/ files in tracked diff.
  • pytest error mode = environmental PermissionError at fixture setup, not regression; doc edit cannot cause Python fixture permission failure.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

## [Claude #6] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. In this current round, Codex #1 already returned `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES` with `337 passed in 40.77s`. This Round #2 re-runs the checks from scratch and surfaces an environmental caveat from the local test session. **Tracked diff (re-inspected):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - `git diff --stat` → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation). - L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation). - L125 (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. **File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L636-685):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642 B-1 row, L643 B-2 row, L679 G2 entry) preserved verbatim — historical record of the inaccuracy that IMP-21 fixes (audit trail). - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens. **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #2 session: `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 21.64s`. - All 31 errors verified as setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User'`. Isolated `tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` → fails at `pytest_asyncio` / `tmp_path` fixture setup with the same PermissionError; never reaches test body. - Persists even with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp` (pytest still resolves `C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User` internally) + `.pytest_cache` writes also blocked. → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock, NOT a regression from the doc edit. - Collection count `300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337` matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`) and prior round Claude #5 collection — same collection, no missing/added tests. - A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` / `pytest_asyncio` fixture `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible from this scope. Codex #1 Round #1 (`337 passed in 40.77s`, clean env) is the binding regression baseline for this round. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, code path, or sample-specific value touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not at risk. **Workflow / governance:** - RULE 4 (commit scope) — single file, scope-lock matches Stage 2 binding contract. - RULE 11 (checkpoint) — Stage 2 IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS u1 (estimate_lines: 3) matches actual diff (3 ins / 3 del). - RULE 13 (anchor sync) — §2.6 G2 catch + INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 catch both preserved verbatim, no anchor drift. **Verdict:** PASS. The edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly. Tracked diff is scope-locked to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` with 3 ins / 3 del. Cross-axis isolation honored. Codex #1 Round #1 already validated regression suite green (`337 passed in 40.77s`) in clean environment; local Round #2 environmental PermissionError is unrelated to this doc edit. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-130` (§1 lens table + module-list) - `Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L636-685` (§2.6 G2 note + Salvage Plan) - `Read PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-144` (§4 G2 cross-ref) - `git diff --name-only` - `python -m pytest -q tests` (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP=D:\tmp` override) - `python -m pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` (single-test isolation) Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` Test results: - Codex #1 Round #1 binding baseline (clean env): `337 passed in 40.77s`. - Local Round #2 session: `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 21.64s` — 31 errors all environmental `PermissionError` at `tmp_path` / `.pytest_cache` setup (`C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User`), confirmed via single-test isolation (`test_discover_counts` fails at fixture setup, never reaches test body). Collection count `337` matches baseline. Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - Tracked diff name-only: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry). - Diff stat: 1 file, 3 insertions, 3 deletions. - L104 B-1 row contains `pipeline.py`, no `content_editor.py`. - L105 B-2 row contains external `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, no `content_editor.py`. - L125 module-list item 6 = `content_editor.py` (entry kept, `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). - `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis untouched). - External `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` token preserved (external-ref axis untouched). - §2.6 G2 note L642-643, L679 — preserved verbatim. - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 catch L136 — preserved verbatim. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/` files in tracked diff. - pytest error mode = environmental `PermissionError` at fixture setup, not regression; doc edit cannot cause Python fixture permission failure. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:44:19 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #7] Stage 4 test-verify Round #3

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Round #1 (Codex #1: FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s) and Round #2 (Claude #6: PASS with environmental tmp_path caveat) both converged. This Round #3 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion.

Tracked diff (re-inspected):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation).
  • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation).
  • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.

File content re-read (post-edit state, L98-132 + L636-685):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim:
    • L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner).
    • L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx).
    • L672 (audit 판정 의 별도 surface 행 — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis).
    • L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch).
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record).

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the (B-1, B-2) annotation removed). ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #3 session (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp): 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.31s.
  • All 31 errors verified as setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User'. Isolated tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts → fails at pytest_asyncio tmp_path fixture setup with the same PermissionError; never reaches test body.
  • Persists even with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp (pytest still resolves C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User internally via pytest_asyncio plugin) and .pytest_cache writes also blocked (PytestCacheWarning: [WinError 5]). → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock, NOT a regression from the doc edit.
  • Collection count 300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (337 passed in 40.77s) and Claude #6 Round #2 collection exactly — same collection, no missing/added tests.
  • A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path / pytest_asyncio fixture PermissionError. Functional regression impossible from this scope.
  • Round #1 (Codex #1) ran in a clean environment and confirmed 337 passed in 40.77s. Treating that as the binding regression baseline (RULE 4: scope-qualified verification).

Hardcoding check (RULE 7 + RULE 0 PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION):

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, frame contract, or code path touched. No new sample-passing hardcoding introduced. The edit removes an inaccuracy in audit lens documentation, which strengthens the pipeline self-understanding rather than weakening it.

Scope-lock guardrails (verified):

  • Single-file scope-lock honored (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only). ✅
  • pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation). ✅
  • External 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation). ✅
  • §2.6 G2 note left intact (already aligned with corrected §1 lens, serves as audit trail). ✅
  • No src/templates/frontend touched. ✅
  • estimate_lines ceiling = 3, actual = 3 (3 insertions / 3 deletions). ✅
  • 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback on IMP-25). Pending Stage 5 commit. ✅

Verdict

PASS. The Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly (1 file / 3 ins / 3 del, scope-locked to audit doc). Cross-axis isolation honored (pipeline.py / external 글벗 fmt_slide.py / §2.6 audit / INSIGHT-MAP cross-ref all preserved). The 31 setup-level test errors are confirmed environmental (Windows %TEMP% permission lock affecting pytest_asyncio tmp_path fixture setup); collection count 300+6+31=337 matches the clean Round #1 baseline 337 passed. Functional regression is mathematically impossible from a markdown doc edit. No new hardcoding. Round #3 ready for Stage 5 (commit + push).

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L98-132 (§1 lens table + module list).
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L636-685 (§2.6 G2 note + Archive Candidate verdict + G2/G3 별 axis pointers).
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-144 (§4 G2 cross-ref).
  • pytest -q tests (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP=D:\tmp override).
  • pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts (isolated tmp_path PermissionError reproducer).

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (target of edit)
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (cross-ref, must remain untouched)

Test results:

  • Round #3 local: 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.31s (collection = 337, matches Round #1 baseline).
  • Isolated reproducer: 2 warnings, 1 error in 0.29s → PermissionError: [WinError 5] ... pytest-of-User at pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:730.
  • Binding baseline = Round #1 (Codex #1) 337 passed in 40.77s in clean environment.

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • Tracked diff name-only = docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • Diff stat = 1 file, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • L104 B-1 row contains pipeline.py, no content_editor.py.
  • L105 B-2 row contains external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, no content_editor.py.
  • L125 module-list item 6 = content_editor.py (entry retained, (B-1, B-2) annotation removed).
  • pipeline.py and external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx tokens preserved.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim — serves as audit trail.
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref) preserved verbatim.
  • No tracked src/, templates/, or frontend files modified.
  • 31 pytest errors all PermissionError from Windows session-level %TEMP%\pytest-of-User lock; isolated reproducer confirms tmp_path fixture setup failure (test body never executes); collection 337 matches Round #1 baseline.
## [Claude #7] Stage 4 test-verify Round #3 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Round #1 (Codex #1: `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES`, 337 passed in 40.77s) and Round #2 (Claude #6: PASS with environmental tmp_path caveat) both converged. This Round #3 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. **Tracked diff (re-inspected):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - `git diff --stat` → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation). - L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation). - L125 (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. **File content re-read (post-edit state, L98-132 + L636-685):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim: - L642 (`B-1` row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner). - L643 (`B-2` row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx`). - L672 (audit 판정 의 별도 surface 행 — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis). - L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record). **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅ - `content_editor.py` module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #3 session (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp`): `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.31s`. - All 31 errors verified as setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User'`. Isolated `tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` → fails at `pytest_asyncio` `tmp_path` fixture setup with the same PermissionError; never reaches test body. - Persists even with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp` (pytest still resolves `C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User` internally via `pytest_asyncio` plugin) and `.pytest_cache` writes also blocked (`PytestCacheWarning: [WinError 5]`). → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock, NOT a regression from the doc edit. - Collection count `300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337` matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`) and Claude #6 Round #2 collection exactly — same collection, no missing/added tests. - A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` / `pytest_asyncio` fixture `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible from this scope. - Round #1 (Codex #1) ran in a clean environment and confirmed `337 passed in 40.77s`. Treating that as the binding regression baseline (RULE 4: scope-qualified verification). **Hardcoding check (RULE 7 + RULE 0 PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION):** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, frame contract, or code path touched. No new sample-passing hardcoding introduced. The edit *removes* an inaccuracy in audit lens documentation, which strengthens the pipeline self-understanding rather than weakening it. **Scope-lock guardrails (verified):** - Single-file scope-lock honored (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only). ✅ - `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation). ✅ - External `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation). ✅ - §2.6 G2 note left intact (already aligned with corrected §1 lens, serves as audit trail). ✅ - No src/templates/frontend touched. ✅ - estimate_lines ceiling = 3, actual = 3 (3 insertions / 3 deletions). ✅ - 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback on IMP-25). Pending Stage 5 commit. ✅ ### Verdict **PASS.** The Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly (1 file / 3 ins / 3 del, scope-locked to audit doc). Cross-axis isolation honored (pipeline.py / external 글벗 fmt_slide.py / §2.6 audit / INSIGHT-MAP cross-ref all preserved). The 31 setup-level test errors are confirmed environmental (Windows %TEMP% permission lock affecting `pytest_asyncio` `tmp_path` fixture setup); collection count `300+6+31=337` matches the clean Round #1 baseline `337 passed`. Functional regression is mathematically impossible from a markdown doc edit. No new hardcoding. Round #3 ready for Stage 5 (commit + push). === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --name-only` - `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L98-132 (§1 lens table + module list). - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L636-685 (§2.6 G2 note + Archive Candidate verdict + G2/G3 별 axis pointers). - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L130-144 (§4 G2 cross-ref). - `pytest -q tests` (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP=D:\tmp` override). - `pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` (isolated tmp_path PermissionError reproducer). Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (target of edit) - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` (cross-ref, must remain untouched) Test results: - Round #3 local: `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.31s` (collection = 337, matches Round #1 baseline). - Isolated reproducer: `2 warnings, 1 error in 0.29s` → `PermissionError: [WinError 5] ... pytest-of-User` at `pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:730`. - Binding baseline = Round #1 (Codex #1) `337 passed in 40.77s` in clean environment. Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - Tracked diff name-only = `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - Diff stat = 1 file, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - L104 B-1 row contains `pipeline.py`, no `content_editor.py`. - L105 B-2 row contains external `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, no `content_editor.py`. - L125 module-list item 6 = `content_editor.py` (entry retained, `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). - `pipeline.py` and external `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` tokens preserved. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim — serves as audit trail. - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref) preserved verbatim. - No tracked `src/`, `templates/`, or frontend files modified. - 31 pytest errors all `PermissionError` from Windows session-level `%TEMP%\pytest-of-User` lock; isolated reproducer confirms `tmp_path` fixture setup failure (test body never executes); collection 337 matches Round #1 baseline.
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:48:00 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #8] Stage 4 test-verify Round #4

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged: Round #1 (Codex #1) FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES with 337 passed in 40.77s; Round #2 (Claude #6) PASS with environmental tmp_path caveat; Round #3 (Claude #7) PASS with same caveat. This Round #4 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion.

Tracked diff (re-inspected):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry).
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • Raw git diff confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations:
    • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation).
    • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation).
    • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.

File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L636-685):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim:
    • L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner).
    • L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx).
    • L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis).
    • L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch).
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record).

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the (B-1, B-2) annotation removed). ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #4 session (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp): 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.66s.
  • All 31 errors verified as setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다. Isolated tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts → fails at .pytest_cache write + tmp_path fixture setup with the same PermissionError; never reaches test body. Reproduced trace: could not create cache path D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.pytest_cache\v\cache\lastfailed: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다.
  • Collection count 300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (337 passed in 40.77s) and Round #2 / Round #3 collection counts exactly — same collection, no missing/added tests.
  • Persists with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp; pytest still resolves C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User internally + .pytest_cache writes also blocked. → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock, NOT a regression from the doc edit.
  • A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path / pytest_asyncio / .pytest_cache PermissionError. Functional regression impossible from this scope.
  • Treating Codex #1 Round #1 (337 passed in 40.77s, clean environment) as the binding regression baseline. Round #2 (Claude #6) and Round #3 (Claude #7) confirmed the same environmental caveat with the same collection count.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) honored.

Scope-lock verification (RULE 4):

  • Single file: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • estimate_lines ceiling = 3; actual = 3 insertions + 3 deletions = exact match.
  • Stage 2 binding contract honored exactly.

Stage 4 status decision:

  • Doc edit matches Stage 2/3 contract verbatim.
  • Cross-axis isolation preserved.
  • Regression baseline = Codex #1 Round #1 (337 passed); local environmental tmp_path lock confirmed as session-level, not a regression.
  • 4 of 4 rounds converged on PASS.

Stage 4 verdict: PASS — ready for Stage 5 (commit + push).

=== EVIDENCE ===

Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git diff --name-only
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • Read line-window L95-134 on docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • Read line-window L636-685 on docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • Read line-window L130-144 on docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md
  • $env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; pytest -q tests
  • $env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts (isolated error reproduction)

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (L95-134 + L636-685)
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (L130-144)

Test results:

  • Local Round #4: 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.66s — 31 errors are environmental PermissionError on tmp_path / .pytest_cache (Windows session-level permission lock), NOT functional regressions.
  • Collection count 300 + 6 + 31 = 337 matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (337 passed in 40.77s, clean environment).
  • Isolated test confirmation: tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts errors at fixture setup with [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.pytest_cache\\v\\cache' — never reaches test body.

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 (Stage 3 has not yet committed; diff still in working tree).
  • Tracked diff name-only output is only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • Diff stat = 1 file changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions.
  • L104 (B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) contains only pipeline.py — content_editor.py removed; pipeline.py preserved.
  • L105 (B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) contains only 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx — content_editor.py removed; external-ref token preserved.
  • L125 (§2 module-list item 6) contains only content_editor.py — entry retained; (B-1, B-2) annotation removed.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim.
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) preserved verbatim.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or cross-reference doc files in the tracked diff.
  • pytest collection count (337) matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline exactly.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

## [Claude #8] Stage 4 test-verify Round #4 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged: Round #1 (Codex #1) `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES` with `337 passed in 40.77s`; Round #2 (Claude #6) PASS with environmental `tmp_path` caveat; Round #3 (Claude #7) PASS with same caveat. This Round #4 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. **Tracked diff (re-inspected):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry). - `git diff --stat` → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - Raw `git diff` confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations: - **L104** (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation). - **L105** (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation). - **L125** (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. **File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L636-685):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim: - L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to `pipeline.py` / composition planner). - L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx`). - L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis). - L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record). **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅ - `content_editor.py` module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #4 session (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp`): `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.66s`. - All 31 errors verified as setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다`. Isolated `tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` → fails at `.pytest_cache` write + `tmp_path` fixture setup with the same PermissionError; never reaches test body. Reproduced trace: `could not create cache path D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.pytest_cache\v\cache\lastfailed: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다`. - Collection count `300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337` matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`) and Round #2 / Round #3 collection counts exactly — same collection, no missing/added tests. - Persists with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp`; pytest still resolves `C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User` internally + `.pytest_cache` writes also blocked. → Environmental Windows session-level permission lock, NOT a regression from the doc edit. - A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` / `pytest_asyncio` / `.pytest_cache` `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible from this scope. - Treating Codex #1 Round #1 (`337 passed in 40.77s`, clean environment) as the binding regression baseline. Round #2 (Claude #6) and Round #3 (Claude #7) confirmed the same environmental caveat with the same collection count. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) honored. **Scope-lock verification (RULE 4):** - Single file: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - estimate_lines ceiling = 3; actual = 3 insertions + 3 deletions = exact match. - Stage 2 binding contract honored exactly. **Stage 4 status decision:** - Doc edit matches Stage 2/3 contract verbatim. - Cross-axis isolation preserved. - Regression baseline = Codex #1 Round #1 (337 passed); local environmental tmp_path lock confirmed as session-level, not a regression. - 4 of 4 rounds converged on PASS. ### Stage 4 verdict: **PASS** — ready for Stage 5 (commit + push). === EVIDENCE === **Commands run:** - `git status --short` - `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git diff --name-only` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `Read` line-window L95-134 on `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `Read` line-window L636-685 on `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `Read` line-window L130-144 on `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` - `$env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; pytest -q tests` - `$env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; pytest -q tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` (isolated error reproduction) **Files checked:** - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (L95-134 + L636-685) - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` (L130-144) **Test results:** - Local Round #4: `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.66s` — 31 errors are environmental `PermissionError` on `tmp_path` / `.pytest_cache` (Windows session-level permission lock), NOT functional regressions. - Collection count `300 + 6 + 31 = 337` matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`, clean environment). - Isolated test confirmation: `tests/test_generate_frame_previews.py::test_discover_counts` errors at fixture setup with `[WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.pytest_cache\\v\\cache'` — never reaches test body. **Verified facts:** - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1` (Stage 3 has not yet committed; diff still in working tree). - Tracked diff name-only output is only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - Diff stat = 1 file changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions. - L104 (B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) contains only `pipeline.py` — `content_editor.py` removed; `pipeline.py` preserved. - L105 (B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column) contains only `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` — `content_editor.py` removed; external-ref token preserved. - L125 (§2 module-list item 6) contains only `content_editor.py` — entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim. - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) preserved verbatim. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or cross-reference doc files in the tracked diff. - pytest collection count (337) matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline exactly. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:51:29 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #9] Stage 4 test-verify Round #5

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged:

  • Round #1 (Codex #1): FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s (clean env).
  • Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS with environmental tmp_path caveat.
  • Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS with same caveat.
  • Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS with same caveat.

This Round #5 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion.

Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry).
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • Raw git diff confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations:
    • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation).
    • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation).
    • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.
  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1, unchanged from Stage 3.

File content re-read (post-edit state):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim:
    • L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner).
    • L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx).
    • L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis).
    • L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch).
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record).

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the (B-1, B-2) annotation removed). ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #5 session (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp): 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s.
  • All 31 errors are setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User'. Pytest still resolves the Windows %TEMP% path internally via pytest_asyncio / tmp_path fixture machinery even with TMPDIR override.
  • Collection count 300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 matches Codex #1 Round #1 clean baseline (337 passed in 40.77s) and prior round collection counts (Claude #6/#7/#8 = 337) exactly. Same collection — no missing/added tests.
  • A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path / pytest_asyncio fixture PermissionError. Functional regression impossible from this scope.
  • Round #1 Codex clean-environment baseline (337 passed in 40.77s) remains the binding regression baseline; Rounds #2~#5 surface the same persistent Windows session-level permission lock on %TEMP%, unchanged across rounds.

Hardcoding check (RULE 0 / RULE 7):

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched.

Verdict: PASS. The edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly, the regression collection is unchanged (337) with the prior clean baseline confirming green pass, and the tracked diff is scope-locked to the audit doc with all cross-axis isolation guardrails honored.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

=== EVIDENCE ===

Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L100-134 (§1 lens table + module list)
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L636-685 (§2.6 G2 note + audit verdict)
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-142 (§4 G2 cross-ref)
  • pytest -q tests (with TMP/TEMP/TMPDIR=D:\tmp override)

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • Tracked diff name-only = docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • Diff stat = 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • L104 B-1 row: contains pipeline.py, no content_editor.py.
  • L105 B-2 row: contains 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, no content_editor.py.
  • L125 module-list item 6: content_editor.py entry retained, (B-1, B-2) annotation removed.
  • pipeline.py (IMP-25 axis) and external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx (external-ref axis) tokens preserved.
  • §2.6 G2 note (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim — historical audit trail intact.
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref) preserved verbatim — aligned with corrected §1 lens.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in tracked diff.

Test results:

  • Local Round #5: 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s.
  • All 31 errors = PermissionError: [WinError 5] on C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User (environmental Windows session lock; persists across TMP override; unrelated to doc edit).
  • Collection = 337 (300 + 6 + 31), matches Codex #1 Round #1 clean baseline 337 passed in 40.77s exactly.
  • Doc-only edit cannot cause Python fixture PermissionError → functional regression impossible from this scope.
## [Claude #9] Stage 4 test-verify Round #5 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged: - Round #1 (Codex #1): `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES`, `337 passed in 40.77s` (clean env). - Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS with environmental `tmp_path` caveat. - Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS with same caveat. - Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS with same caveat. This Round #5 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. **Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry). - `git diff --stat` → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - Raw `git diff` confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations: - **L104** (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation). - **L105** (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation). - **L125** (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`, unchanged from Stage 3. **File content re-read (post-edit state):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim: - L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to `pipeline.py` / composition planner). - L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx`). - L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis). - L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record). **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅ - `content_editor.py` module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #5 session (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp`): `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s`. - All 31 errors are setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\\Users\\User\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\pytest-of-User'`. Pytest still resolves the Windows %TEMP% path internally via `pytest_asyncio` / `tmp_path` fixture machinery even with TMPDIR override. - Collection count `300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337` matches Codex #1 Round #1 clean baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`) and prior round collection counts (Claude #6/#7/#8 = 337) exactly. Same collection — no missing/added tests. - A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` / `pytest_asyncio` fixture `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible from this scope. - Round #1 Codex clean-environment baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`) remains the binding regression baseline; Rounds #2~#5 surface the same persistent Windows session-level permission lock on `%TEMP%`, unchanged across rounds. **Hardcoding check (RULE 0 / RULE 7):** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched. **Verdict:** **PASS**. The edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly, the regression collection is unchanged (337) with the prior clean baseline confirming green pass, and the tracked diff is scope-locked to the audit doc with all cross-axis isolation guardrails honored. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L100-134 (§1 lens table + module list) - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L636-685 (§2.6 G2 note + audit verdict) - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L130-142 (§4 G2 cross-ref) - `pytest -q tests` (with TMP/TEMP/TMPDIR=D:\tmp override) Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - Tracked diff name-only = `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - Diff stat = 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - L104 B-1 row: contains `pipeline.py`, no `content_editor.py`. - L105 B-2 row: contains `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, no `content_editor.py`. - L125 module-list item 6: `content_editor.py` entry retained, `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed. - `pipeline.py` (IMP-25 axis) and external `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` (external-ref axis) tokens preserved. - §2.6 G2 note (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim — historical audit trail intact. - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref) preserved verbatim — aligned with corrected §1 lens. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in tracked diff. Test results: - Local Round #5: `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s`. - All 31 errors = `PermissionError: [WinError 5]` on `C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User` (environmental Windows session lock; persists across TMP override; unrelated to doc edit). - Collection = 337 (300 + 6 + 31), matches Codex #1 Round #1 clean baseline `337 passed in 40.77s` exactly. - Doc-only edit cannot cause Python fixture PermissionError → functional regression impossible from this scope.
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:55:17 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #10] Stage 4 test-verify Round #6

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged:

  • Round #1 (Codex #1): FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s (clean env).
  • Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS with environmental tmp_path caveat.
  • Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #5 (Claude #9): PASS, same caveat.

This Round #6 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. No new findings — convergence is genuine.

Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry).
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • Raw git diff confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations:
    • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation).
    • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation).
    • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.
  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1, unchanged from Stage 3.

File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L636-685 + INSIGHT-MAP L131-142):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim:
    • L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner).
    • L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx).
    • L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis).
    • L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch).
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record).

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the (B-1, B-2) annotation removed). ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #6 session (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp): 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.20s.
  • All 31 errors are setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User'. Environmental Windows session-level permission lock on %TEMP% — not a regression from the doc edit.
  • Collection count 300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 matches Round #1 clean-env baseline (337 passed in 40.77s per Codex #1) exactly — same collection set, no missing/added tests.
  • A markdown doc edit at docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path / pytest_asyncio fixture PermissionError. Functional regression impossible from this scope.
  • Treating Codex #1 Round #1 clean-env result (337 passed in 40.77s) as the binding regression baseline for this stage.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) — not applicable to doc edit.

Round redundancy note (candid):

  • Codex #1 returned FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES in Round #1 with clean-env baseline. Rounds #2-#5 (Claude #6, #7, #8, #9) re-verified independently and all returned PASS with the same environmental caveat. This Round #6 surfaces no new findings — the verification has been genuinely convergent since Round #2. Continued rounds are restating the same conclusion. Recommend Stage 5 (commit-push) or stage close.

Verdict

PASS. The Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly (1 file, 3 ins / 3 del, three target lines), cross-axis isolation honored (IMP-25 pipeline.py + external-ref 글벗 fmt_slide.py preserved), §2.6 G2 self-catch + INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref preserved verbatim as audit trail, regression baseline green (337 passed clean per Codex #1 R#1; local env errors environmental, not code-related).

=== EVIDENCE ===

Commands run:

  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff --stat
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-130
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L636-685
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L131-142
  • pytest -q tests (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp)

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (sole tracked edit)
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (cross-ref verification, untouched)

Test results:

  • Round #6 local: 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.20s. 337 total collection (matches clean-env baseline). All 31 errors = env-level PermissionError on tmp_path fixtures (C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User), unrelated to doc edit.
  • Clean-env baseline (Codex #1 R#1, binding): 337 passed in 40.77s.

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1, unchanged from Stage 3.
  • Tracked diff = docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only. 1 file, 3 ins(+), 3 del(-).
  • L104 contains pipeline.py only — content_editor.py removed.
  • L105 contains external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx only — content_editor.py removed.
  • L125 contains content_editor.py entry — (B-1, B-2) annotation removed.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim.
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged.
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) preserved verbatim.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in diff.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

## [Claude #10] Stage 4 test-verify Round #6 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged: - Round #1 (Codex #1): `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES`, `337 passed in 40.77s` (clean env). - Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS with environmental `tmp_path` caveat. - Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS, same caveat. - Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS, same caveat. - Round #5 (Claude #9): PASS, same caveat. This Round #6 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. **No new findings — convergence is genuine.** **Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry). - `git diff --stat` → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - Raw `git diff` confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations: - **L104** (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation). - **L105** (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation). - **L125** (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`, unchanged from Stage 3. **File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L636-685 + INSIGHT-MAP L131-142):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim: - **L642** (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to `pipeline.py` / composition planner). - **L643** (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx`). - **L672** (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis). - **L679** (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record). **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅ - `content_editor.py` module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #6 session (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp`): `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.20s`. - All 31 errors are setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다: 'C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User'`. Environmental Windows session-level permission lock on `%TEMP%` — not a regression from the doc edit. - Collection count `300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337` matches Round #1 clean-env baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s` per Codex #1) exactly — same collection set, no missing/added tests. - A markdown doc edit at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` / `pytest_asyncio` fixture `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible from this scope. - Treating Codex #1 Round #1 clean-env result (`337 passed in 40.77s`) as the binding regression baseline for this stage. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) — not applicable to doc edit. **Round redundancy note (candid):** - Codex #1 returned `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES` in Round #1 with clean-env baseline. Rounds #2-#5 (Claude #6, #7, #8, #9) re-verified independently and all returned PASS with the same environmental caveat. This Round #6 surfaces no new findings — the verification has been genuinely convergent since Round #2. Continued rounds are restating the same conclusion. Recommend Stage 5 (commit-push) or stage close. ### Verdict **PASS.** The Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly (1 file, 3 ins / 3 del, three target lines), cross-axis isolation honored (IMP-25 pipeline.py + external-ref 글벗 fmt_slide.py preserved), §2.6 G2 self-catch + INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref preserved verbatim as audit trail, regression baseline green (337 passed clean per Codex #1 R#1; local env errors environmental, not code-related). === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `git diff --name-only` - `git diff --stat` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L95-130 - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L636-685 - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L131-142 - `pytest -q tests` (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp) Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (sole tracked edit) - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` (cross-ref verification, untouched) Test results: - Round #6 local: `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.20s`. 337 total collection (matches clean-env baseline). All 31 errors = env-level `PermissionError` on `tmp_path` fixtures (`C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User`), unrelated to doc edit. - Clean-env baseline (Codex #1 R#1, binding): `337 passed in 40.77s`. Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`, unchanged from Stage 3. - Tracked diff = `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. 1 file, 3 ins(+), 3 del(-). - L104 contains `pipeline.py` only — `content_editor.py` removed. - L105 contains external 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` only — `content_editor.py` removed. - L125 contains `content_editor.py` entry — `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed. - §2.6 G2 self-catch (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim. - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged. - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) preserved verbatim. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in diff. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 12:58:38 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #11] Stage 4 test-verify Round #7

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged:

  • Round #1 (Codex #1): FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s (clean env).
  • Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS, environmental tmp_path caveat.
  • Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #5 (Claude #9): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #6 (Claude #10): PASS, same caveat.

This Round #7 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. No new findings.

Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry).
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • Raw git diff confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations:
    • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored).
    • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored).
    • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; only the (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.
  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1, unchanged from Stage 3.
  • estimate_lines Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3. ✅

File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-134 + L636-685 + INSIGHT-MAP L130-142):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim:
    • L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner).
    • L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx).
    • L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis).
    • L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch).
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged.
  • §2.6 G3 forward pointer (L673, L681) — unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record).

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the (B-1, B-2) annotation removed). ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #7 session (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp): 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.24s.
  • All 31 errors are setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다 resolving to C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User. Environmental Windows session-level permission lock on %TEMP% (pytest resolves the path internally regardless of env override).
  • Collection arithmetic: 300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 total tests collected. Matches Round #1 (Codex #1: 337 passed in 40.77s, clean env) and all subsequent rounds exactly. No test added/removed by the doc edit.
  • A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path / pytest_asyncio fixture PermissionError. Functional regression impossible from this scope.
  • Treating Round #1 clean-env result (337 passed in 40.77s) as the binding regression baseline.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, frame, or code path touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) honored.

Binding contract compliance (Stage 2/3 → Stage 4):

  • unit_executed: u1 (single file, 3 line edits, audit-doc correction) — matches.
  • files_changed: ['docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md'] — matches.
  • diff_summary: 1 file / 3 ins / 3 del — matches.
  • remaining_units: [] — confirmed, no further units.
  • guardrails (single-file scope-lock / pipeline.py preserved / external 글벗 fmt_slide.py preserved / §2.6 G2 intact / no src·templates·frontend·cross-ref touched / no pytest run constraint in Stage 3 — pytest run here is the Stage 4 regression requirement) — all honored.

Convergence note:

  • Seven verification rounds (Codex #1 + Claude #5-#11) all return PASS with identical findings. The doc-only diff is exactly 3 lines, scope-locked to a single file, and matches the Stage 2 implementation_unit u1 exactly. The Windows tmp_path permission errors are environmental and persist across rounds independent of any code change; collection count parity with Round #1 clean env (337 tests) confirms no test surface was lost.

Verdict

PASS. Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly. Cross-axis isolation (IMP-25, external-ref-precision, §2.6 G2, INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2) preserved. No regression possible from doc-only edit. Environmental tmp_path failures are not Stage 3-induced.

=== EVIDENCE ===

Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --stat
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • Read line-window: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-134, L636-685
  • Read line-window: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-144
  • pytest -q tests (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP=D:\tmp)

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 (Stage 3 commit, unchanged).
  • Tracked diff: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • Diff stat: 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • L104 B-1 row: contains pipeline.py, no content_editor.py.
  • L105 B-2 row: contains 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, no content_editor.py.
  • L125 module-list item 6: content_editor.py entry retained, (B-1, B-2) annotation removed.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch (L642-643, L672, L679): preserved verbatim.
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670): unchanged.
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136): preserved verbatim.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/ files in tracked diff.
  • estimate_lines Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3.

Test results:

  • Round #7 local (Windows): 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.24s.
  • Collection total 300 + 6 + 31 = 337 matches Round #1 Codex clean-env baseline (337 passed in 40.77s).
  • All 31 errors are setup-level PermissionError on C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User — environmental, not regression-induced.
  • Functional regression impossible from a markdown audit-doc edit.

Verdict: PASS.

## [Claude #11] Stage 4 test-verify Round #7 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged: - Round #1 (Codex #1): `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES`, `337 passed in 40.77s` (clean env). - Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS, environmental `tmp_path` caveat. - Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS, same caveat. - Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS, same caveat. - Round #5 (Claude #9): PASS, same caveat. - Round #6 (Claude #10): PASS, same caveat. This Round #7 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. **No new findings.** **Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry). - `git diff --stat` → `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - Raw `git diff` confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations: - **L104** (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored). - **L105** (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored). - **L125** (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; only the `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`, unchanged from Stage 3. - `estimate_lines` Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3. ✅ **File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-134 + L636-685 + INSIGHT-MAP L130-142):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim: - **L642** (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to `pipeline.py` / composition planner). - **L643** (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx`). - **L672** (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis). - **L679** (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. - §2.6 G3 forward pointer (L673, L681) — unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record). **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅ - `content_editor.py` module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #7 session (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp`): `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.24s`. - All 31 errors are setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5] 액세스가 거부되었습니다` resolving to `C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User`. Environmental Windows session-level permission lock on `%TEMP%` (`pytest` resolves the path internally regardless of env override). - Collection arithmetic: `300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337` total tests collected. Matches Round #1 (Codex #1: 337 passed in 40.77s, clean env) and all subsequent rounds exactly. No test added/removed by the doc edit. - A markdown doc edit cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` / `pytest_asyncio` fixture `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible from this scope. - Treating Round #1 clean-env result (`337 passed in 40.77s`) as the binding regression baseline. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, frame, or code path touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) honored. **Binding contract compliance (Stage 2/3 → Stage 4):** - `unit_executed: u1` (single file, 3 line edits, audit-doc correction) — matches. - `files_changed: ['docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md']` — matches. - `diff_summary: 1 file / 3 ins / 3 del` — matches. - `remaining_units: []` — confirmed, no further units. - `guardrails` (single-file scope-lock / pipeline.py preserved / external 글벗 fmt_slide.py preserved / §2.6 G2 intact / no src·templates·frontend·cross-ref touched / no pytest run constraint in Stage 3 — pytest run here is the Stage 4 regression requirement) — all honored. **Convergence note:** - Seven verification rounds (Codex #1 + Claude #5-#11) all return PASS with identical findings. The doc-only diff is exactly 3 lines, scope-locked to a single file, and matches the Stage 2 implementation_unit u1 exactly. The Windows `tmp_path` permission errors are environmental and persist across rounds independent of any code change; collection count parity with Round #1 clean env (337 tests) confirms no test surface was lost. ### Verdict **PASS.** Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly. Cross-axis isolation (IMP-25, external-ref-precision, §2.6 G2, INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2) preserved. No regression possible from doc-only edit. Environmental `tmp_path` failures are not Stage 3-induced. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --stat` - `git diff --name-only` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `Read` line-window: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L95-134, L636-685 - `Read` line-window: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L130-144 - `pytest -q tests` (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP=D:\tmp`) Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD: `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1` (Stage 3 commit, unchanged). - Tracked diff: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - Diff stat: 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - L104 B-1 row: contains `pipeline.py`, no `content_editor.py`. - L105 B-2 row: contains 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, no `content_editor.py`. - L125 module-list item 6: `content_editor.py` entry retained, `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed. - §2.6 G2 self-catch (L642-643, L672, L679): preserved verbatim. - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670): unchanged. - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136): preserved verbatim. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/` files in tracked diff. - `estimate_lines` Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3. Test results: - Round #7 local (Windows): `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.24s`. - Collection total `300 + 6 + 31 = 337` matches Round #1 Codex clean-env baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`). - All 31 errors are setup-level `PermissionError` on `C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User` — environmental, not regression-induced. - Functional regression impossible from a markdown audit-doc edit. Verdict: PASS.
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:01:41 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #12] Stage 4 test-verify Round #8

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged:

  • Round #1 (Codex #1): FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s (clean env).
  • Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS, environmental tmp_path caveat.
  • Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #5 (Claude #9): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #6 (Claude #10): PASS, same caveat.
  • Round #7 (Claude #11): PASS, same caveat.

This Round #8 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. No new findings — convergence is genuine and stable.

Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry).
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • Raw git diff confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations:
    • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored).
    • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored).
    • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; only the (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.
  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1, unchanged from Stage 3.
  • estimate_lines Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3. ✅

File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-134 + L636-685 + INSIGHT-MAP L131-142):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim:
    • L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner).
    • L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx).
    • L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis).
    • L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch).
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged.
  • §2.6 G3 forward pointer (L673, L681) — unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record).

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the (B-1, B-2) annotation removed). ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #8 session (with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden to D:\tmp): 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s.
  • All 31 errors are setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] on C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User (pytest internally resolves the canonical %LOCALAPPDATA%\Temp path even with TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP overridden). Errors fire at tmp_path fixture setup; test bodies never execute.
  • Collection count 300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 total matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (337 passed in 40.77s clean env) and prior rounds — same collection, no missing/added tests.
  • A markdown doc edit (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md) cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path / pytest_asyncio fixture PermissionError. Functional regression impossible from this scope.
  • Round #1 (Codex #1, clean env: 337 passed in 40.77s) remains the binding regression baseline.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) — not applicable in this scope.

Convergence assessment:

  • Round #1 (Codex) + Rounds #2-#7 (Claude) all returned PASS with identical findings.
  • Round #8 surfaces no new evidence and no scope leak.
  • Continued rounds add no signal; the consensus is stable.

Verdict: PASS

Stage 4 verification confirms:

  1. Tracked diff matches Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly (1 file, 3 ins/3 del, scope-locked).
  2. Cross-axis isolation (IMP-25, external-ref, §2.6 G2 historical record, INSIGHT-MAP L136) honored.
  3. Regression suite green in clean env (337 passed, Codex #1 Round #1 baseline). Local Windows env's 31 errors are environmental (tmp_path permission lock), not regression — collection count matches.
  4. No hardcoding, no scope creep, no cross-file dependency.

Ready for Stage 5 (commit-push) on Codex re-affirmation of YES (no rewind needed).

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff --stat
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-134, L636-685
  • Read PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L131-142
  • $env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; pytest -q tests

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (target of edit)
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (cross-ref preserved)

Test results:

  • Local Round #8 session: 300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s. All 31 errors environmental PermissionError on tmp_path / .pytest_cache writes; test bodies never reach. Collection count 337 matches clean-env baseline (Codex #1 Round #1: 337 passed in 40.77s).

Verified facts:

  • Tracked diff = docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • L104 B-1 row contains pipeline.py, no longer contains content_editor.py.
  • L105 B-2 row contains external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, no longer contains content_editor.py.
  • L125 module-list item 6 retains content_editor.py entry, removes (B-1, B-2) annotation.
  • pipeline.py and external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx tokens preserved (axis isolation).
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim.
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 G2 cross-ref preserved verbatim.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/ files modified.
  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1, unchanged from Stage 3.
  • estimate_lines ceiling = 3, observed = 3.
## [Claude #12] Stage 4 test-verify Round #8 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged: - Round #1 (Codex #1): `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES`, `337 passed in 40.77s` (clean env). - Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS, environmental `tmp_path` caveat. - Round #3 (Claude #7): PASS, same caveat. - Round #4 (Claude #8): PASS, same caveat. - Round #5 (Claude #9): PASS, same caveat. - Round #6 (Claude #10): PASS, same caveat. - Round #7 (Claude #11): PASS, same caveat. This Round #8 re-runs the checks from scratch and confirms the same conclusion. **No new findings — convergence is genuine and stable.** **Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry). - `git diff --stat` → `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - Raw `git diff` confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations: - **L104** (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored). - **L105** (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored). - **L125** (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; only the `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`, unchanged from Stage 3. - `estimate_lines` Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3. ✅ **File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-134 + L636-685 + INSIGHT-MAP L131-142):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim: - **L642** (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to `pipeline.py` / composition planner). - **L643** (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx`). - **L672** (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis). - **L679** (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. - §2.6 G3 forward pointer (L673, L681) — unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record). **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅ - `content_editor.py` module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #8 session (with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden to `D:\tmp`): `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s`. - All 31 errors are setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5]` on `C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Temp\pytest-of-User` (pytest internally resolves the canonical `%LOCALAPPDATA%\Temp` path even with `TMPDIR/TMP/TEMP` overridden). Errors fire at `tmp_path` fixture setup; test bodies never execute. - Collection count `300 passed + 6 skipped + 31 errors = 337 total` matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s` clean env) and prior rounds — same collection, no missing/added tests. - A markdown doc edit (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md) cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` / `pytest_asyncio` fixture `PermissionError`. Functional regression impossible from this scope. - Round #1 (Codex #1, clean env: `337 passed in 40.77s`) remains the binding regression baseline. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, or code path touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) — not applicable in this scope. **Convergence assessment:** - Round #1 (Codex) + Rounds #2-#7 (Claude) all returned PASS with identical findings. - Round #8 surfaces no new evidence and no scope leak. - Continued rounds add no signal; the consensus is stable. ### Verdict: **PASS** Stage 4 verification confirms: 1. Tracked diff matches Stage 2/3 binding contract exactly (1 file, 3 ins/3 del, scope-locked). 2. Cross-axis isolation (IMP-25, external-ref, §2.6 G2 historical record, INSIGHT-MAP L136) honored. 3. Regression suite green in clean env (337 passed, Codex #1 Round #1 baseline). Local Windows env's 31 errors are environmental (`tmp_path` permission lock), not regression — collection count matches. 4. No hardcoding, no scope creep, no cross-file dependency. Ready for Stage 5 (commit-push) on Codex re-affirmation of YES (no rewind needed). === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --name-only` - `git diff --stat` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - Read PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L95-134, L636-685 - Read PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L131-142 - `$env:TMPDIR='D:\tmp'; $env:TMP='D:\tmp'; $env:TEMP='D:\tmp'; pytest -q tests` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (target of edit) - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` (cross-ref preserved) Test results: - Local Round #8 session: `300 passed, 6 skipped, 2 warnings, 31 errors in 17.17s`. All 31 errors environmental `PermissionError` on `tmp_path` / `.pytest_cache` writes; test bodies never reach. Collection count 337 matches clean-env baseline (Codex #1 Round #1: 337 passed in 40.77s). Verified facts: - Tracked diff = `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). - L104 B-1 row contains `pipeline.py`, no longer contains `content_editor.py`. - L105 B-2 row contains external `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`, no longer contains `content_editor.py`. - L125 module-list item 6 retains `content_editor.py` entry, removes `(B-1, B-2)` annotation. - `pipeline.py` and external `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` tokens preserved (axis isolation). - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642-643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim. - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 G2 cross-ref preserved verbatim. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/` files modified. - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`, unchanged from Stage 3. - `estimate_lines` ceiling = 3, observed = 3.
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:13:07 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #13] Stage 4 test-verify Round #9

Verification Summary

Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged:

  • Round #1 (Codex #1): FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s (clean env).
  • Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS, environmental tmp_path caveat.
  • Rounds #3-#8 (Claude #7-#12): PASS, same caveat or clean.

This Round #9 re-runs the checks from scratch and reproduces the clean-env result. No new findings — convergence remains genuine.

Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):

  • git diff --name-only → docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (single entry).
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • Raw git diff confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations:
    • L104 (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored).
    • L105 (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored).
    • L125 (§2 module-list item 6): content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Entry retained; only the (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly.
  • Baseline HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1, unchanged from Stage 3. Stage 3 exit report had commit_sha: pending (Stage 4 will produce) — confirmed: IMP-21 edit is unstaged working-tree change, awaiting Stage 5 commit.
  • estimate_lines Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3. ✅

File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L638-687 + INSIGHT-MAP L132-141):

  • L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim:
    • L642 (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to pipeline.py / composition planner).
    • L643 (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx).
    • L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis).
    • L679 (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch).
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged.
  • §2.6 G3 forward pointer (L673, L681) — unchanged.
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record).

Cross-axis isolation (verified):

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the (B-1, B-2) annotation removed). ✅

Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:

  • Local Round #9 session (this round): 337 passed in 41.76s. ✅
  • Matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (337 passed in 40.77s) and Claude #4 Round #2 (337 passed in 41.18s) exactly. Collection count stable across all clean-env runs.
  • Local Windows env on prior rounds (Claude #5-#12) reported 300 passed + 37 errors collection-equivalent to 337, all errors confirmed as setup-level PermissionError: [WinError 5] on %TEMP%\pytest-of-User — environmental, not regression. Current round reproduces clean baseline, confirming environmental nature of those tmp_path errors.
  • A doc-only markdown edit cannot mathematically cause Python tmp_path fixture errors. Functional regression impossible.

Hardcoding check:

  • N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, frame, or code path touched.
  • RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered.

Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):

  • Single-file scope-lock: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only.
  • estimate_lines ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact match).
  • 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback).
  • audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): N/A (edits at L104-L125 are mid-doc, no anchor surface).
  • workflow_atomicity_rules: same-file Edit sequential honored.

Convergence assessment:

  • Codex #1 returned FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES in Round #1 with clean-env 337 passed.
  • Rounds #2-#8 (seven Claude re-verifications) all PASS — same diff, same content, same cross-ref preservation. Local tmp_path PermissionError isolated as environmental Windows session lock.
  • Round #9 (this round) reproduces clean baseline 337 passed in 41.76s, eliminating the environmental caveat.
  • No new findings since Round #2. Convergence is stable; further rounds add no signal.

Verdict

PASS — Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly, regression suite green in clean env (337 passed, matches baseline), cross-axis isolation guardrails honored, no regressions, no hardcoding surface. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push).

=== EVIDENCE ===

commands_run:

  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • git status --short
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff --stat
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git log --oneline -3 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L638-687 (§2.6 G2 note region)
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L132-141 (§4 G2 cross-ref)
  • pytest -q tests

files_checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree, post-edit)
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (HEAD, unchanged)

test_results:

  • pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 41.76s (clean — matches Codex #1 / Claude #4 baseline)

verified_facts:

  • HEAD = 134f52d3d3 (Stage 3 entry baseline, unchanged; IMP-21 edit is unstaged working-tree change).
  • Tracked modified files: exactly 1 — docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • Diff stat: 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). Exact match to estimate_lines ceiling.
  • L104 (B-1 row): content_editor.py removed; pipeline.py token preserved.
  • L105 (B-2 row): content_editor.py removed; 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx token preserved.
  • L125 (module-list item 6): (B-1, B-2) annotation removed; content_editor.py entry retained.
  • §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim.
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged.
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) preserved verbatim.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in tracked diff.
  • pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 41.76s (no regression, baseline match).

source_comment_ids:

  • Codex #1 (Stage 4 Round #1: FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s)
  • Claude #4 (Stage 4 Round #2: PASS, 337 passed in 41.18s)
  • Claude #6-#12 (Stage 4 Rounds #2-#8: PASS, environmental tmp_path caveat — non-regression)
  • Stage 3 Exit Report (commit_sha: pending — confirmed Stage 5 will produce commit)
  • Stage 2 Exit Report (estimate_lines: 3 — exact match)

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

## [Claude #13] Stage 4 test-verify Round #9 ### Verification Summary Fresh independent re-verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Prior rounds converged: - Round #1 (Codex #1): `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES`, `337 passed in 40.77s` (clean env). - Round #2 (Claude #6): PASS, environmental `tmp_path` caveat. - Rounds #3-#8 (Claude #7-#12): PASS, same caveat or clean. This Round #9 re-runs the checks from scratch and reproduces the **clean-env** result. **No new findings — convergence remains genuine.** **Tracked diff (re-inspected, fresh):** - `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (single entry). - `git diff --stat` → `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - Raw `git diff` confirms exact line-level edits at the three target locations: - **L104** (§1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored). - **L105** (§1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column): `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored). - **L125** (§2 module-list item 6): `content_editor.py` (B-1, B-2) → `content_editor.py`. Entry retained; only the `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Scope-lock honored exactly. - Baseline HEAD = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`, unchanged from Stage 3. Stage 3 exit report had `commit_sha: pending (Stage 4 will produce)` — confirmed: IMP-21 edit is unstaged working-tree change, awaiting Stage 5 commit. - `estimate_lines` Stage 2 ceiling = 3, observed = 3. ✅ **File content re-read (post-edit state, L95-130 + L638-687 + INSIGHT-MAP L132-141):** - L104 / L105 / L125 contents match the binding contract verbatim. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note preserved verbatim: - **L642** (B-1 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to `pipeline.py` / composition planner). - **L643** (B-2 row, "부정확" tag, content_editor pointer to 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx`). - **L672** (별도 surface — §1 정정 필요 G2 별 axis). - **L679** (G2 entry — content_editor B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. - §2.6 G3 forward pointer (L673, L681) — unchanged. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 (§4 G2 cross-ref catch) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same mismatch as historical record). **Cross-axis isolation (verified):** - IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — not touched. ✅ - External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — not touched. ✅ - §2.6 G2 historical catch record (L642-643, L672, L679) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) — preserved verbatim. ✅ - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) — unchanged. ✅ - `content_editor.py` module-list entry (L125) — retained (only the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation removed). ✅ **Regression check (pytest -q tests) — scope-qualified:** - Local Round #9 session (this round): `337 passed in 41.76s`. ✅ - Matches Codex #1 Round #1 baseline (`337 passed in 40.77s`) and Claude #4 Round #2 (`337 passed in 41.18s`) exactly. Collection count stable across all clean-env runs. - Local Windows env on prior rounds (Claude #5-#12) reported `300 passed + 37 errors` collection-equivalent to 337, all errors confirmed as setup-level `PermissionError: [WinError 5]` on `%TEMP%\pytest-of-User` — environmental, not regression. Current round reproduces clean baseline, confirming environmental nature of those tmp_path errors. - A doc-only markdown edit cannot mathematically cause Python `tmp_path` fixture errors. Functional regression impossible. **Hardcoding check:** - N/A — doc-only correction. No MDX sample, template, frame, or code path touched. - RULE 0 (PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION) / RULE 7 (No hardcoding) not triggered. **Scope-lock guardrails (all honored):** - Single-file scope-lock: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only. - `estimate_lines` ceiling = 3 → actual = 3 (exact match). - 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback). - audit-anchor-first-line regression guard (P5): N/A (edits at L104-L125 are mid-doc, no anchor surface). - workflow_atomicity_rules: same-file Edit sequential honored. **Convergence assessment:** - Codex #1 returned `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES` in Round #1 with clean-env 337 passed. - Rounds #2-#8 (seven Claude re-verifications) all PASS — same diff, same content, same cross-ref preservation. Local tmp_path PermissionError isolated as environmental Windows session lock. - Round #9 (this round) reproduces clean baseline 337 passed in 41.76s, eliminating the environmental caveat. - No new findings since Round #2. **Convergence is stable; further rounds add no signal.** ### Verdict **PASS** — Stage 3 edit matches the Stage 2 binding contract exactly, regression suite green in clean env (337 passed, matches baseline), cross-axis isolation guardrails honored, no regressions, no hardcoding surface. Ready for Stage 5 (commit + push). === EVIDENCE === commands_run: - git rev-parse HEAD - git status --short - git diff --name-only - git diff --stat - git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - git log --oneline -3 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md - Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L638-687 (§2.6 G2 note region) - Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L132-141 (§4 G2 cross-ref) - pytest -q tests files_checked: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (working-tree, post-edit) - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (HEAD, unchanged) test_results: - pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 41.76s (clean — matches Codex #1 / Claude #4 baseline) verified_facts: - HEAD = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 (Stage 3 entry baseline, unchanged; IMP-21 edit is unstaged working-tree change). - Tracked modified files: exactly 1 — docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md. - Diff stat: 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-). Exact match to estimate_lines ceiling. - L104 (B-1 row): content_editor.py removed; pipeline.py token preserved. - L105 (B-2 row): content_editor.py removed; 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx token preserved. - L125 (module-list item 6): (B-1, B-2) annotation removed; content_editor.py entry retained. - §2.6 G2 self-catch note (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim. - §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) unchanged. - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) preserved verbatim. - No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in tracked diff. - pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 41.76s (no regression, baseline match). source_comment_ids: - Codex #1 (Stage 4 Round #1: FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES, 337 passed in 40.77s) - Claude #4 (Stage 4 Round #2: PASS, 337 passed in 41.18s) - Claude #6-#12 (Stage 4 Rounds #2-#8: PASS, environmental tmp_path caveat — non-regression) - Stage 3 Exit Report (commit_sha: pending — confirmed Stage 5 will produce commit) - Stage 2 Exit Report (estimate_lines: 3 — exact match) FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:15:32 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #2] Stage 4 test-verify

Independent Stage 4 verification completed against the Stage 2/3 binding contract.

Verdict: PASS. The working-tree tracked diff is scope-locked to docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, has exactly 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-), and implements only the IMP-21 doc correction. The required test command passed cleanly.

Diff verification:

  • git diff --name-only reports only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • git diff --stat reports 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • The B-1 audit lens row now maps to pipeline.py only; content_editor.py is no longer listed there.
  • The B-2 audit lens row now maps to the external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx reference only; content_editor.py is no longer listed there.
  • The module list keeps content_editor.py as an audited module but removes the (B-1, B-2) axis annotation.
  • No tracked src/, templates/, frontend/, or cross-reference document changes are present.

Cross-axis verification:

  • IMP-25 pipeline precision axis was not touched.
  • External fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx precision axis was not touched.
  • The content_editor.py archive-candidate verdict and the G2 historical self-catch note remain in place.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md remains unchanged and still records the G2 mismatch as historical/cross-reference context.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff --stat
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • line-window read of docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md around the audit lens table and module list
  • line-window read of docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md around the content_editor.py audit/G2 note
  • line-window read of docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md around the G2 cross-reference
  • pytest -q tests

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md

Test results:

  • pytest -q tests -> 337 passed in 41.23s

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD remains 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • The only tracked modified file is docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • The tracked diff is exactly 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • The B-1 row removed the inaccurate content_editor.py association and preserved pipeline.py.
  • The B-2 row removed the inaccurate content_editor.py association and preserved the external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx reference.
  • The module-list entry keeps content_editor.py but removes the (B-1, B-2) annotation.
  • Unrelated untracked local files are present, but they are outside the tracked IMP-21 diff.
  • The Stage 4 test-verify gate is satisfied; commit is OK.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

## [Codex #2] Stage 4 test-verify Independent Stage 4 verification completed against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Verdict: PASS. The working-tree tracked diff is scope-locked to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, has exactly `3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`, and implements only the IMP-21 doc correction. The required test command passed cleanly. Diff verification: - `git diff --name-only` reports only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - `git diff --stat` reports `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - The B-1 audit lens row now maps to `pipeline.py` only; `content_editor.py` is no longer listed there. - The B-2 audit lens row now maps to the external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` reference only; `content_editor.py` is no longer listed there. - The module list keeps `content_editor.py` as an audited module but removes the `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation. - No tracked `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or cross-reference document changes are present. Cross-axis verification: - IMP-25 pipeline precision axis was not touched. - External `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` precision axis was not touched. - The `content_editor.py` archive-candidate verdict and the G2 historical self-catch note remain in place. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` remains unchanged and still records the G2 mismatch as historical/cross-reference context. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --name-only` - `git diff --stat` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - line-window read of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` around the audit lens table and module list - line-window read of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` around the `content_editor.py` audit/G2 note - line-window read of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` around the G2 cross-reference - `pytest -q tests` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` Test results: - `pytest -q tests` -> `337 passed in 41.23s` Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD remains `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - The only tracked modified file is `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - The tracked diff is exactly `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - The B-1 row removed the inaccurate `content_editor.py` association and preserved `pipeline.py`. - The B-2 row removed the inaccurate `content_editor.py` association and preserved the external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` reference. - The module-list entry keeps `content_editor.py` but removes the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation. - Unrelated untracked local files are present, but they are outside the tracked IMP-21 diff. - The Stage 4 test-verify gate is satisfied; commit is OK. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:18:20 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Claude #14] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2 (Claude r2)

Independent fresh Stage 4 verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract, run from scratch.

Verdict: PASS. Tracked working-tree diff is scope-locked to docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md with exactly 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) matching the Stage 2 estimate_lines: 3 ceiling. pytest -q tests passed cleanly (337 passed in 41.10s). All cross-axis isolation guardrails honored. No regression, no scope creep.

Diff verification

  • git diff --name-only → single entry docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • git diff --stat → 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • git rev-parse HEAD → 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 (Stage 3 baseline, unchanged — IMP-21 edits remain unstaged, awaiting Stage 5 commit per Stage 3 exit report commit_sha: pending).
  • Raw git diff confirms the three line-level edits exactly as scope-locked:
    • L104 §1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column: pipeline.py, content_editor.py → pipeline.py. pipeline.py token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored).
    • L105 §1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column: 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py → 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored).
    • L125 §2 module-list item 6: content_editor.py (B-1, B-2) → content_editor.py. Module entry retained — only the (B-1, B-2) axis annotation removed.
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Single-file scope-lock honored exactly.

Cross-axis isolation (re-verified)

  • IMP-25 axis (pipeline.py B-1 precision) → not touched. ✅
  • External-ref-precision axis (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) → not touched. ✅
  • §2.6 G2 historical self-catch note preserved verbatim at L642 (B-1 부정확 tag), L643 (B-2 부정확 tag), L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 별 axis), L679 (G2 entry — B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). Historical record remains aligned with corrected §1 lens. ✅
  • §2.6 Archive Candidate verdict (L667-670) → unchanged. ✅
  • §2.6 G3 forward pointer (L673, L681) → unchanged. ✅
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same historical mismatch). ✅
  • content_editor.py module-list entry (L125) retained — §2.6 audits it. ✅

Hardcoding / scope-lock check

  • N/A (doc-only edit, zero LoC in src/ or templates/).
  • estimate_lines: 3 ceiling matched exactly (observed = 3).
  • 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback) honored.

Test environment caveat

pytest -q tests from this verification run: 337 passed in 41.10s — clean env, matches Stage 2 baseline and prior Codex / Claude clean-env results (Codex #1 40.77s, Claude #3 40.91s, Claude #4 41.18s, Codex #2 41.23s). Prior local-Windows runs (Claude #5-#9) showed 300 passed, 37 errors from environmental PermissionError: [WinError 5] on tmp_path fixture creation — not present in this run. No code-related test failures.

Convergence note

This is the third independent PASS verdict in the current Stage 4 cycle following Codex #1 (FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES) and Codex #2 (FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES). All Claude rounds (Claude #3-#13) also returned PASS. No new findings; the binding contract is satisfied and the edit is ready for Stage 5 commit.

=== EVIDENCE ===

Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff --stat
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L638-687 (§2.6 audit + G2/G3 notes)
  • Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L130-144 (§4 G2 cross-ref)
  • pytest -q tests

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md

Test results:

  • pytest -q tests → 337 passed in 41.10s (clean)

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 unchanged from Stage 3.
  • Only tracked modified file is docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • Tracked diff is exactly 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — matches Stage 2 estimate_lines: 3.
  • B-1 row (L104) removed inaccurate content_editor.py association, preserved pipeline.py (IMP-25 axis isolation).
  • B-2 row (L105) removed inaccurate content_editor.py association, preserved external 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx (external-ref axis isolation).
  • Module-list (L125) retained content_editor.py entry, removed (B-1, B-2) annotation.
  • §2.6 G2 historical catch (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim — aligned with corrected §1 lens.
  • INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) preserved verbatim — historical record consistent.
  • pytest clean: 337 passed in 41.10s (matches Stage 2 baseline).
  • No src/, templates/, frontend/, or cross-reference doc touched.
  • Stage 4 test-verify gate satisfied; commit OK.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

## [Claude #14] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2 (Claude r2) Independent fresh Stage 4 verification of the Stage 3 doc-only edit against the Stage 2/3 binding contract, run from scratch. Verdict: **PASS**. Tracked working-tree diff is scope-locked to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` with exactly `3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)` matching the Stage 2 `estimate_lines: 3` ceiling. `pytest -q tests` passed cleanly (337 passed in 41.10s). All cross-axis isolation guardrails honored. No regression, no scope creep. ### Diff verification - `git diff --name-only` → single entry `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - `git diff --stat` → `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - `git rev-parse HEAD` → `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1` (Stage 3 baseline, unchanged — IMP-21 edits remain unstaged, awaiting Stage 5 commit per Stage 3 exit report `commit_sha: pending`). - Raw `git diff` confirms the three line-level edits exactly as scope-locked: - **L104** §1 lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column: `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → `pipeline.py`. `pipeline.py` token preserved (IMP-25 axis isolation honored). - **L105** §1 lens B-2 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" column: `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`. External-ref token preserved (external-ref-precision axis isolation honored). - **L125** §2 module-list item 6: `content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` → `content_editor.py`. Module entry retained — only the `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation removed. - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or other doc files in the tracked diff. Single-file scope-lock honored exactly. ### Cross-axis isolation (re-verified) - **IMP-25 axis** (pipeline.py B-1 precision) → not touched. ✅ - **External-ref-precision axis** (글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`) → not touched. ✅ - **§2.6 G2 historical self-catch note** preserved verbatim at L642 (B-1 부정확 tag), L643 (B-2 부정확 tag), L672 (별도 surface — §1 정정 별 axis), L679 (G2 entry — B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확 self-catch). Historical record remains aligned with corrected §1 lens. ✅ - **§2.6 Archive Candidate verdict** (L667-670) → unchanged. ✅ - **§2.6 G3 forward pointer** (L673, L681) → unchanged. ✅ - **INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref** (`PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136) preserved verbatim — wording remains consistent with corrected §1 lens (records the same historical mismatch). ✅ - **content_editor.py module-list entry** (L125) retained — §2.6 audits it. ✅ ### Hardcoding / scope-lock check - N/A (doc-only edit, zero LoC in `src/` or `templates/`). - `estimate_lines: 3` ceiling matched exactly (observed = 3). - 1 commit = 1 decision unit (IMP-21 only, no piggyback) honored. ### Test environment caveat `pytest -q tests` from this verification run: **337 passed in 41.10s** — clean env, matches Stage 2 baseline and prior Codex / Claude clean-env results (Codex #1 40.77s, Claude #3 40.91s, Claude #4 41.18s, Codex #2 41.23s). Prior local-Windows runs (Claude #5-#9) showed `300 passed, 37 errors` from environmental `PermissionError: [WinError 5]` on `tmp_path` fixture creation — not present in this run. No code-related test failures. ### Convergence note This is the third independent PASS verdict in the current Stage 4 cycle following Codex #1 (FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES) and Codex #2 (FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES). All Claude rounds (Claude #3-#13) also returned PASS. No new findings; the binding contract is satisfied and the edit is ready for Stage 5 commit. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --name-only` - `git diff --stat` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L638-687 (§2.6 audit + G2/G3 notes) - Read `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L130-144 (§4 G2 cross-ref) - `pytest -q tests` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` Test results: - `pytest -q tests` → `337 passed in 41.10s` (clean) Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1` unchanged from Stage 3. - Only tracked modified file is `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - Tracked diff is exactly `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)` — matches Stage 2 `estimate_lines: 3`. - B-1 row (L104) removed inaccurate `content_editor.py` association, preserved `pipeline.py` (IMP-25 axis isolation). - B-2 row (L105) removed inaccurate `content_editor.py` association, preserved external `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` (external-ref axis isolation). - Module-list (L125) retained `content_editor.py` entry, removed `(B-1, B-2)` annotation. - §2.6 G2 historical catch (L642, L643, L672, L679) preserved verbatim — aligned with corrected §1 lens. - INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 cross-ref (L136) preserved verbatim — historical record consistent. - pytest clean: 337 passed in 41.10s (matches Stage 2 baseline). - No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or cross-reference doc touched. - Stage 4 test-verify gate satisfied; commit OK. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:21:50 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #3] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2

Independent Stage 4 verification completed against the Stage 2/3 binding contract.

Verdict: PASS. The tracked working-tree diff is scope-locked to docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, has exactly 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-), and implements only the IMP-21 audit-doc correction. The required test command passed cleanly.

Diff verification:

  • git diff --name-only reports only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • git diff --stat reports 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md confirms the only edits remove content_editor.py from the B-1 row, remove content_editor.py from the B-2 row, and remove the (B-1, B-2) annotation from the module-list entry.
  • rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md confirms current line anchors: B-1 row at L104, B-2 row at L105, and module-list content_editor.py entry at L125.
  • The B-1 audit lens row now maps to pipeline.py only; content_editor.py is no longer listed there.
  • The B-2 audit lens row now maps to the external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx reference only; content_editor.py is no longer listed there.
  • The module list keeps content_editor.py as an audited module but removes the (B-1, B-2) axis annotation.
  • No tracked src/, templates/, frontend/, or cross-reference document changes are present.

Cross-axis verification:

  • IMP-25 pipeline precision axis was not touched: the B-1 row preserves pipeline.py.
  • External fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx precision axis was not touched: the B-2 row preserves the external reference.
  • The content_editor.py archive-candidate verdict and the G2 historical self-catch note remain in place at L642, L643, L677, L679, and L687.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md remains unchanged and still records the G2 mismatch as historical/cross-reference context at L136.
  • Unrelated untracked local files are present, but they are outside the tracked IMP-21 diff.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git diff --name-only
  • git diff --stat
  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • rg -n "G2|B-1 / B-2 column|content_editor\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md
  • line-window read of docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md around the audit lens table and module list
  • line-window read of docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md around the content_editor.py audit/G2 note
  • line-window read of docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md around the G2 cross-reference
  • pytest -q tests

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md

Test results:

  • pytest -q tests -> 337 passed in 41.39s

Verified facts:

  • Baseline HEAD remains 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • The only tracked modified file is docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • The tracked diff is exactly 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • The B-1 row removed the inaccurate content_editor.py association and preserved pipeline.py.
  • The B-2 row removed the inaccurate content_editor.py association and preserved the external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx reference.
  • The module-list entry keeps content_editor.py but removes the (B-1, B-2) annotation.
  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md is not in the tracked diff and its G2 cross-reference remains aligned as a historical catch record.
  • Stage 4 test-verify gate is satisfied; commit is OK.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

[Codex #3] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2 Independent Stage 4 verification completed against the Stage 2/3 binding contract. Verdict: PASS. The tracked working-tree diff is scope-locked to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, has exactly `3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`, and implements only the IMP-21 audit-doc correction. The required test command passed cleanly. Diff verification: - `git diff --name-only` reports only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - `git diff --stat` reports `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` confirms the only edits remove `content_editor.py` from the B-1 row, remove `content_editor.py` from the B-2 row, and remove the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation from the module-list entry. - `rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` confirms current line anchors: B-1 row at L104, B-2 row at L105, and module-list `content_editor.py` entry at L125. - The B-1 audit lens row now maps to `pipeline.py` only; `content_editor.py` is no longer listed there. - The B-2 audit lens row now maps to the external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` reference only; `content_editor.py` is no longer listed there. - The module list keeps `content_editor.py` as an audited module but removes the `(B-1, B-2)` axis annotation. - No tracked `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or cross-reference document changes are present. Cross-axis verification: - IMP-25 pipeline precision axis was not touched: the B-1 row preserves `pipeline.py`. - External `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` precision axis was not touched: the B-2 row preserves the external reference. - The `content_editor.py` archive-candidate verdict and the G2 historical self-catch note remain in place at L642, L643, L677, L679, and L687. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` remains unchanged and still records the G2 mismatch as historical/cross-reference context at L136. - Unrelated untracked local files are present, but they are outside the tracked IMP-21 diff. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git diff --name-only` - `git diff --stat` - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `rg -n "G2|B-1 / B-2 column|content_editor\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` - line-window read of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` around the audit lens table and module list - line-window read of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` around the `content_editor.py` audit/G2 note - line-window read of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` around the G2 cross-reference - `pytest -q tests` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` Test results: - `pytest -q tests` -> `337 passed in 41.39s` Verified facts: - Baseline HEAD remains `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - The only tracked modified file is `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - The tracked diff is exactly `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - The B-1 row removed the inaccurate `content_editor.py` association and preserved `pipeline.py`. - The B-2 row removed the inaccurate `content_editor.py` association and preserved the external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` reference. - The module-list entry keeps `content_editor.py` but removes the `(B-1, B-2)` annotation. - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` is not in the tracked diff and its G2 cross-reference remains aligned as a historical catch record. - Stage 4 test-verify gate is satisfied; commit is OK. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:25:28 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

📌 [Claude #6] Stage 5: 커밋 및 푸쉬 R1 — IMP-21

■ 핵심 결정

  • IMP-21 audit-doc 수정 atomic commit (5590ef2), 1 file, +3/-3.
  • Commit message style = docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거 (recent docs(#NN): 형식 정합 — #56/#57 precedent).
  • Push 양 remote 동기화 완료 — origin (GitHub) + slide2 (Gitea mirror) 모두 5590ef2 도달.
  • Stage 4 R1 PASS contract (1 file / 3+/3- / L104·L105·L125 / pipeline.py + 글벗 fmt_slide.py + §2.6 archive verdict 보존) 와 staged diff 정합 — scope creep 없음.

■ 범위 제외

  • 별 axis 모두 commit 외부 유지:
    • IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — 별 이슈 축.
    • 외부 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx reference precision — 별 축.
    • content_editor.py §2.6 Archive Candidate 판정 (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687) — 변경 X.
    • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 G2 catch record — 변경 X (현재 wording 이 corrected lens 와 정합).
    • src/ templates/ frontend — 0 line 변경.
  • Untracked noise (.orchestrator/, tests/matching/, templates/phase_z2/families/, samples/, chromedriver/, etc.) — Stage 5 commit 비포함, RULE 6 (specific files only) 준수.

■ 다음 단계

  • Stage 6 (Codex 최종 검증 + 이슈 close) 진입. Codex 가 remote 5590ef2 SHA / push 양 remote / commit message style / scope 정합 (1 file, 3+/3-, src 무변경) / regression 부재 재검증.

=== EXIT REPORT (binding contract) ===

issue: IMP-21
stage: 5_commit_push
status: complete

commit:
  sha: 5590ef2
  full_sha: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  parent: 134f52d  # feat(#58): L3 dormant trigger guard -- DORMANT-TRIGGERS.yaml + checker + orchestrator hook
  message: |
    docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거
  files_changed: 1
  insertions: 3
  deletions: 3
  commit_scope:
    - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md  # L104 B-1 row, L105 B-2 row, L125 module-list axis annotation
  out_of_scope_excluded:
    - src/                                       # 0 change (git status clean)
    - templates/                                 # 0 change
    - frontend/                                  # 0 change
    - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md  # untouched (G2 catch record current)
    - all untracked noise (.orchestrator/, samples/, chromedriver/, tests/matching/, templates/phase_z2/families/, etc.)

push:
  origin:
    url: git@github.com:keimin86/design_agent.git
    remote_sha_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
    range: 134f52d..5590ef2
    status: success
  slide2:
    url: https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2.git
    remote_sha_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
    range: 134f52d..5590ef2
    status: success
  local_head: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  parity: true  # local HEAD == origin/main == slide2/main

verification_commands:
  - "git status --short"
  - "git diff --staged --stat"
  - "git add docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md"
  - "git commit -m '...'"
  - "git log -1 --format=fuller"
  - "git push origin main"
  - "git push slide2 main"
  - "git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main"
  - "git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main"
  - "git rev-parse HEAD"

guardrails_preserved:
  - GR1: single-file scope-lock — only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md staged
  - GR2: IMP-25 axis isolation — pipeline.py token preserved in B-1 row (L104)
  - GR3: external-ref axis isolation — 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved in B-2 row (L105)
  - GR4: §2.6 archive verdict preserved — content_editor.py audit refs at L642/L643/L677/L679/L687 untouched
  - GR5: cross-doc isolation — PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 G2 catch record untouched (current wording already accommodates corrected lens)
  - PZ-1: AI isolation — doc-only correction, no Kei/AI rewrite involved
  - RULE 6: git add specific files only — 1 explicit path, no `-A` / `.` usage
  - RULE 11: meta-rule application checkpoint — Stage 4 R1 contract (1 file, 3+/3-, anchors L104/L105/L125, archive verdict preserved) verified pre-commit and post-commit

regression_check:
  src_diff: empty
  templates_diff: empty
  frontend_diff: empty
  imp25_axis: untouched (B-1 row retains pipeline.py)
  external_fmt_slide_axis: untouched (B-2 row retains 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx)
  content_editor_archive_verdict: preserved (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687)
  g2_historical_self_catch_cross_doc: preserved (PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136)
  codex_r1_precision_note: reconciled (phase_z2_verification_utils.py = local B-2 verification utility; main reverse = external 글벗 — no scope change)

unresolved_questions: []  # Stage 1 Q1/Q2/Q3 all resolved by Stage 2/3 (cross-ref doc untouched, L124→L125 annotation dropped entirely, standalone IMP-21 commit per backlog rules)

source_comment_ids:
  - "[Claude] Stage 1 problem review Round 1"
  - "[Claude] Stage 1 problem review Round 2 — Codex precision reconcile"
  - "[Codex r1] Stage 1 precision note: phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split + L125 line-number correction + YES"
  - "[Claude] Stage 2 simulation-plan"
  - "[Codex #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan verify YES"
  - "[Claude] Stage 3 code-edit (u1)"
  - "[Codex r1] Stage 3 verify: tracked diff bounded 3+/3-, scope-locked YES"
  - "[Claude] Stage 4 test-verify R1 PASS"
  - "[Codex #3] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2 YES"
  - "[Claude #6] Stage 5 commit-push R1"

commit_sha: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac

=== EVIDENCE ===

local HEAD:
  $ git rev-parse HEAD
  5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac

remote SHAs (post-push):
  $ git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main
  5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac  refs/heads/main
  $ git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main
  5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac  refs/heads/main

push transcripts:
  $ git push origin main
  To github.com:keimin86/design_agent.git
     134f52d..5590ef2  main -> main

  $ git push slide2 main
  remote: . Processing 1 references
  remote: Processed 1 references in total
  To https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2.git
     134f52d..5590ef2  main -> main

staged diff (pre-commit):
  $ git diff --staged --stat
   docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 6 +++---
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

commit author/date/message:
  $ git log -1 --format=fuller
  commit 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  Author:     kyeongmin <b24009@hanmaceng.co.kr>
  AuthorDate: Wed May 20 13:23:32 2026 +0900
  Commit:     kyeongmin <b24009@hanmaceng.co.kr>
  CommitDate: Wed May 20 13:23:32 2026 +0900

      docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거

scope guards:
  $ git diff --stat 134f52d..5590ef2
   docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 6 +++---
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

  $ git diff 134f52d..5590ef2 -- src/ templates/ frontend/
  (empty — 0 lines)

commit message style:
  matches recent #56/#57 precedent:
    101143e docs(#56): INTEGRATION-AUDIT-02 + backlog L51/L67 -- IMP-07 no-runtime / IMP-16 dormant
    8c1e563 docs(#57): INTEGRATION-AUDIT-02 doc-sync banner on IMP-16-U2-WIRING-DESIGN

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

📌 **[Claude #6] Stage 5: 커밋 및 푸쉬 R1 — IMP-21** ■ **핵심 결정** - IMP-21 audit-doc 수정 atomic commit (`5590ef2`), 1 file, +3/-3. - Commit message style = `docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거` (recent `docs(#NN):` 형식 정합 — #56/#57 precedent). - Push 양 remote 동기화 완료 — `origin` (GitHub) + `slide2` (Gitea mirror) 모두 `5590ef2` 도달. - Stage 4 R1 PASS contract (1 file / 3+/3- / L104·L105·L125 / `pipeline.py` + 글벗 `fmt_slide.py` + §2.6 archive verdict 보존) 와 staged diff 정합 — scope creep 없음. ■ **범위 제외** - 별 axis 모두 commit 외부 유지: - IMP-25 (`pipeline.py` B-1 precision) — 별 이슈 축. - 외부 `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` reference precision — 별 축. - `content_editor.py` §2.6 Archive Candidate 판정 (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687) — 변경 X. - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L136 G2 catch record — 변경 X (현재 wording 이 corrected lens 와 정합). - `src/` `templates/` `frontend` — 0 line 변경. - Untracked noise (`.orchestrator/`, `tests/matching/`, `templates/phase_z2/families/`, `samples/`, `chromedriver/`, etc.) — Stage 5 commit 비포함, RULE 6 (specific files only) 준수. ■ **다음 단계** - Stage 6 (Codex 최종 검증 + 이슈 close) 진입. Codex 가 remote `5590ef2` SHA / push 양 remote / commit message style / scope 정합 (1 file, 3+/3-, src 무변경) / regression 부재 재검증. === EXIT REPORT (binding contract) === ```yaml issue: IMP-21 stage: 5_commit_push status: complete commit: sha: 5590ef2 full_sha: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac parent: 134f52d # feat(#58): L3 dormant trigger guard -- DORMANT-TRIGGERS.yaml + checker + orchestrator hook message: | docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거 files_changed: 1 insertions: 3 deletions: 3 commit_scope: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md # L104 B-1 row, L105 B-2 row, L125 module-list axis annotation out_of_scope_excluded: - src/ # 0 change (git status clean) - templates/ # 0 change - frontend/ # 0 change - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md # untouched (G2 catch record current) - all untracked noise (.orchestrator/, samples/, chromedriver/, tests/matching/, templates/phase_z2/families/, etc.) push: origin: url: git@github.com:keimin86/design_agent.git remote_sha_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac range: 134f52d..5590ef2 status: success slide2: url: https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2.git remote_sha_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac range: 134f52d..5590ef2 status: success local_head: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac parity: true # local HEAD == origin/main == slide2/main verification_commands: - "git status --short" - "git diff --staged --stat" - "git add docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md" - "git commit -m '...'" - "git log -1 --format=fuller" - "git push origin main" - "git push slide2 main" - "git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main" - "git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main" - "git rev-parse HEAD" guardrails_preserved: - GR1: single-file scope-lock — only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md staged - GR2: IMP-25 axis isolation — pipeline.py token preserved in B-1 row (L104) - GR3: external-ref axis isolation — 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx preserved in B-2 row (L105) - GR4: §2.6 archive verdict preserved — content_editor.py audit refs at L642/L643/L677/L679/L687 untouched - GR5: cross-doc isolation — PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 G2 catch record untouched (current wording already accommodates corrected lens) - PZ-1: AI isolation — doc-only correction, no Kei/AI rewrite involved - RULE 6: git add specific files only — 1 explicit path, no `-A` / `.` usage - RULE 11: meta-rule application checkpoint — Stage 4 R1 contract (1 file, 3+/3-, anchors L104/L105/L125, archive verdict preserved) verified pre-commit and post-commit regression_check: src_diff: empty templates_diff: empty frontend_diff: empty imp25_axis: untouched (B-1 row retains pipeline.py) external_fmt_slide_axis: untouched (B-2 row retains 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) content_editor_archive_verdict: preserved (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687) g2_historical_self_catch_cross_doc: preserved (PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136) codex_r1_precision_note: reconciled (phase_z2_verification_utils.py = local B-2 verification utility; main reverse = external 글벗 — no scope change) unresolved_questions: [] # Stage 1 Q1/Q2/Q3 all resolved by Stage 2/3 (cross-ref doc untouched, L124→L125 annotation dropped entirely, standalone IMP-21 commit per backlog rules) source_comment_ids: - "[Claude] Stage 1 problem review Round 1" - "[Claude] Stage 1 problem review Round 2 — Codex precision reconcile" - "[Codex r1] Stage 1 precision note: phase_z2_verification_utils.py vs 글벗 fmt_slide.py split + L125 line-number correction + YES" - "[Claude] Stage 2 simulation-plan" - "[Codex #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan verify YES" - "[Claude] Stage 3 code-edit (u1)" - "[Codex r1] Stage 3 verify: tracked diff bounded 3+/3-, scope-locked YES" - "[Claude] Stage 4 test-verify R1 PASS" - "[Codex #3] Stage 4 test-verify Round #2 YES" - "[Claude #6] Stage 5 commit-push R1" commit_sha: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac ``` === EVIDENCE === ``` local HEAD: $ git rev-parse HEAD 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac remote SHAs (post-push): $ git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac refs/heads/main $ git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac refs/heads/main push transcripts: $ git push origin main To github.com:keimin86/design_agent.git 134f52d..5590ef2 main -> main $ git push slide2 main remote: . Processing 1 references remote: Processed 1 references in total To https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2.git 134f52d..5590ef2 main -> main staged diff (pre-commit): $ git diff --staged --stat docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) commit author/date/message: $ git log -1 --format=fuller commit 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac Author: kyeongmin <b24009@hanmaceng.co.kr> AuthorDate: Wed May 20 13:23:32 2026 +0900 Commit: kyeongmin <b24009@hanmaceng.co.kr> CommitDate: Wed May 20 13:23:32 2026 +0900 docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거 scope guards: $ git diff --stat 134f52d..5590ef2 docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) $ git diff 134f52d..5590ef2 -- src/ templates/ frontend/ (empty — 0 lines) commit message style: matches recent #56/#57 precedent: 101143e docs(#56): INTEGRATION-AUDIT-02 + backlog L51/L67 -- IMP-07 no-runtime / IMP-16 dormant 8c1e563 docs(#57): INTEGRATION-AUDIT-02 doc-sync banner on IMP-16-U2-WIRING-DESIGN ``` FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:27:30 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #4] Stage 5 commit/push verification R1 - IMP-21

Decision: PASS.

Verified commit 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac is local HEAD and the live remote main ref on both origin and slide2. The commit scope is exactly docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md with 3 insertions(+) / 3 deletions(-). No src/, templates/, frontend/, or cross-reference doc file is included in the commit.

The current worktree still has unrelated untracked files, but git diff --cached --name-only is empty and the untracked files are not part of HEAD.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git status --short
  • git log -1 --format="%H%n%P%n%s"
  • git show --stat --oneline --decorate --no-renames HEAD
  • git show --numstat --format= --no-renames HEAD
  • git remote -v
  • git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main
  • git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main
  • git show --name-only --format= HEAD
  • git diff --stat 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1..5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  • git show --format= --no-ext-diff --unified=3 HEAD -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py|Archive Candidate|G2" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git show --format=%B -s HEAD
  • git diff --cached --name-only
  • git rev-parse HEAD

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • HEAD commit metadata
  • origin refs/heads/main
  • slide2 refs/heads/main

Commit SHA:

  • local HEAD: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  • origin/main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  • slide2/main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  • parent: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1

Verified facts:

  • Local HEAD, origin/main, and slide2/main all resolve to 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac.
  • HEAD parent is 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • The commit contains exactly one file: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • Commit stat is exactly 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • B-1 row now lists pipeline.py and no content_editor.py.
  • B-2 row now lists fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx and no content_editor.py.
  • The module-list content_editor.py entry remains, with the B-1/B-2 axis annotation removed.
  • Existing section 2.6 G2/archive references for content_editor.py are preserved.
  • git diff --cached --name-only returned empty output.
  • git status --short shows unrelated untracked files only; no tracked or staged modification is included in the commit.
  • Full pytest was not run because the current stage requires commit/push verification only and explicitly says not to run full pytest unless required.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

[Codex #4] Stage 5 commit/push verification R1 - IMP-21 Decision: PASS. Verified commit `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` is local `HEAD` and the live remote `main` ref on both `origin` and `slide2`. The commit scope is exactly `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` with `3 insertions(+) / 3 deletions(-)`. No `src/`, `templates/`, `frontend/`, or cross-reference doc file is included in the commit. The current worktree still has unrelated untracked files, but `git diff --cached --name-only` is empty and the untracked files are not part of `HEAD`. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git status --short` - `git log -1 --format="%H%n%P%n%s"` - `git show --stat --oneline --decorate --no-renames HEAD` - `git show --numstat --format= --no-renames HEAD` - `git remote -v` - `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` - `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main` - `git show --name-only --format= HEAD` - `git diff --stat 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1..5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` - `git show --format= --no-ext-diff --unified=3 HEAD -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py|Archive Candidate|G2" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git show --format=%B -s HEAD` - `git diff --cached --name-only` - `git rev-parse HEAD` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `HEAD` commit metadata - `origin refs/heads/main` - `slide2 refs/heads/main` Commit SHA: - local `HEAD`: `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` - `origin/main`: `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` - `slide2/main`: `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` - parent: `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1` Verified facts: - Local `HEAD`, `origin/main`, and `slide2/main` all resolve to `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac`. - `HEAD` parent is `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - The commit contains exactly one file: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - Commit stat is exactly `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - B-1 row now lists `pipeline.py` and no `content_editor.py`. - B-2 row now lists `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` and no `content_editor.py`. - The module-list `content_editor.py` entry remains, with the B-1/B-2 axis annotation removed. - Existing section 2.6 G2/archive references for `content_editor.py` are preserved. - `git diff --cached --name-only` returned empty output. - `git status --short` shows unrelated untracked files only; no tracked or staged modification is included in the commit. - Full pytest was not run because the current stage requires commit/push verification only and explicitly says not to run full pytest unless required. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:30:46 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

📌 [Claude #5] Stage 6: 최종 확인 / close Round #1

■ Issue body re-read vs result

  • Issue title: IMP-21 G2 — audit §1 lens B-1/B-2 column 정정
  • Issue scope (verbatim):
    • content_editor.py 매핑 부정확 정정
    • B-1 zone-section override = pipeline.py / composition planner 영역 (content_editor 아님)
    • B-2 HTML→MDX 역변환 = 글벗 html_to_slide_mdx (content_editor 아님)
    • content_editor 는 block 안 slot 채우기 — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름
  • Issue guardrail: audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) + cross-ref 정합
  • Result match: ✅ exact. Single doc edit, 3+/3-, no other axis touched.

■ Commit verification (3-way SHA match)

  • local HEAD = 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  • origin/main = 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  • slide2/main = 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  • parent = 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1
  • subject = docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거
  • diff stat = 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  • file changed = docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only

■ Goal vs result (axis-by-axis)

Axis Issue spec Post-commit state Verdict
§1 lens B-1 row (L104) drop content_editor.py, keep pipeline.py | **B-1** | ... | pipeline.py | 중 | ✅
§1 lens B-2 row (L105) drop content_editor.py, keep 글벗 ref | **B-2** | ... | 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx | 중 | ✅
Module list (L125) content_editor entry stays, (B-1, B-2) annotation drops 6. content_editor.py`` (bare) ✅
§2.6 G2 self-catch (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687) preserve intact (still records prior inaccuracy) ✅
IMP-25 axis preservation pipeline.py token must remain in B-1 present at L104 ✅
External-ref axis preservation 글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx must remain in B-2 present at L105 ✅
Out-of-scope files no src/templates/frontend/cross-ref-doc change confirmed by git diff --name-only ✅

■ Follow-up links (carried forward, NOT this issue)

  • IMP-25 — pipeline.py B-1 precision axis (separate issue trigger pending)
  • 글벗 외부 ref precision — fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx (separate axis trigger pending)
  • content_editor.py §2.6 Archive Candidate 실행 — separate axis (§3 검토 대상 외 currently)
  • AI repair fallback (G3) infrastructure reuse 평가 — separate axis
  • PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136 historical mismatch note — already sufficient as-is per Stage 2 consensus

■ Labels

  • current: needs-codex-review (open)
  • after close: label can be removed; issue closes as completed

■ Close decision: PASS — ready to close

  • Scope contract honored (single doc, 3+/3-).
  • All 5 prior-stage exit reports converge (Stage 1 root cause → Stage 5 push verification all PASS).
  • 3-way SHA match on origin + slide2 + local.
  • No regression risk against IMP-25, external-ref, content_editor archive-verdict, or PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP cross-ref.
  • No unresolved blockers within IMP-21 scope.
issue: 21
stage: 6
stage_name: final_close
round: 1
decision: PASS

issue_body_reread:
  title: "IMP-21 G2 — audit §1 lens B-1/B-2 column 정정"
  scope_match: exact
  guardrail_match: exact (doc-only, §1 표 only, cross-ref 정합)
  dependency: none (honored)

commit_on_origin:
  sha: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  parent: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1
  origin_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  slide2_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  local_head:  5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac
  three_way_match: true
  subject: "docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거"

goal_vs_result:
  spec_edits_required: 3
  spec_edits_applied: 3
  diff_stat: "1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)"
  file: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  scope_creep: none
  axis_preservation:
    imp25_pipeline_py: preserved (L104)
    external_ref_geulbeot: preserved (L105)
    content_editor_archive_verdict: preserved (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687)
    cross_ref_phase_q_insight_map: untouched (L136)

follow_up_links:
  - IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — separate axis
  - external-ref precision (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — separate axis
  - content_editor.py §2.6 archive execution — separate axis
  - AI repair fallback (G3) reuse evaluation — separate axis
  - PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 historical note — sufficient as-is

labels:
  current: [needs-codex-review]
  recommended_on_close: remove needs-codex-review

close_decision: close
close_reason: scope-contract honored, 3-way SHA match, no regression, no unresolved blockers

guardrails_honored:
  - scope_lock_single_file: PASS
  - one_commit_one_decision_unit: PASS
  - factual_verification (value+path+upstream): PASS
  - scope_qualified_verification: PASS
  - workflow_atomicity_rules: PASS
  - no_hardcoding: PASS (doc-only edit)
  - no_imp25_drift: PASS
  - no_external_ref_drift: PASS
  - no_archive_verdict_drift: PASS

evidence:
  commands_run:
    - "git log -1 --format='%H %s' 5590ef2"
    - "git diff --stat 5590ef2^..5590ef2 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md"
    - "git diff 5590ef2^..5590ef2 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md"
    - "git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main"
    - "git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main"
    - "git rev-parse HEAD"
    - "curl gitea API issue 21 (state + labels)"
    - "grep -n 'content_editor.py|pipeline.py|fmt_slide|B-1|B-2' docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md"
  files_checked:
    - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  verified_facts:
    - L104 B-1 row: only `pipeline.py` in 후보 파일 column
    - L105 B-2 row: only `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` in 후보 파일 column
    - L125 module list: `content_editor.py` bare (no annotation)
    - L642/L643/L677/L679/L687: §2.6 G2 self-catch preserved
    - 3-way SHA = 5590ef2

unresolved_questions: []

source_comment_ids:
  - "[Claude #2] Stage 1 — problem review (Round 2)"
  - "[Claude #3] Stage 3 — code-edit close"
  - "[Claude #4] Stage 4 — test-verify close"
  - "[Codex #4] Stage 5 — commit/push verification R1"

next_step: issue_21_close (remove needs-codex-review label, close as completed). IMP-25 axis stays as separate issue; external-ref precision stays as separate axis pending user trigger.

📌 **[Claude #5] Stage 6: 최종 확인 / close Round #1** ■ **Issue body re-read vs result** - Issue title: `IMP-21 G2 — audit §1 lens B-1/B-2 column 정정` - Issue scope (verbatim): - `content_editor.py` 매핑 부정확 정정 - B-1 zone-section override = `pipeline.py` / composition planner 영역 (content_editor 아님) - B-2 HTML→MDX 역변환 = 글벗 `html_to_slide_mdx` (content_editor 아님) - content_editor 는 *block 안 slot 채우기* — B-1/B-2 와 영역 다름 - Issue guardrail: audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) + cross-ref 정합 - Result match: ✅ exact. Single doc edit, 3+/3-, no other axis touched. ■ **Commit verification (3-way SHA match)** - local HEAD = `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` - origin/main = `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` - slide2/main = `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac` - parent = `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1` - subject = `docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거` - diff stat = `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)` - file changed = `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only ■ **Goal vs result (axis-by-axis)** | Axis | Issue spec | Post-commit state | Verdict | |---|---|---|---| | §1 lens B-1 row (L104) | drop `content_editor.py`, keep `pipeline.py` | `\| **B-1** \| ... \| `pipeline.py` \| 중 \|` | ✅ | | §1 lens B-2 row (L105) | drop `content_editor.py`, keep 글벗 ref | `\| **B-2** \| ... \| 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` \| 중 \|` | ✅ | | Module list (L125) | content_editor entry stays, `(B-1, B-2)` annotation drops | `6. `content_editor.py`` (bare) | ✅ | | §2.6 G2 self-catch (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687) | preserve | intact (still records prior inaccuracy) | ✅ | | IMP-25 axis preservation | `pipeline.py` token must remain in B-1 | present at L104 | ✅ | | External-ref axis preservation | 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` must remain in B-2 | present at L105 | ✅ | | Out-of-scope files | no src/templates/frontend/cross-ref-doc change | confirmed by `git diff --name-only` | ✅ | ■ **Follow-up links (carried forward, NOT this issue)** - IMP-25 — `pipeline.py` B-1 precision axis (separate issue trigger pending) - 글벗 외부 ref precision — `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` (separate axis trigger pending) - `content_editor.py` §2.6 Archive Candidate 실행 — separate axis (§3 검토 대상 외 currently) - AI repair fallback (G3) infrastructure reuse 평가 — separate axis - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:136` historical mismatch note — already sufficient as-is per Stage 2 consensus ■ **Labels** - current: `needs-codex-review` (open) - after close: label can be removed; issue closes as `completed` ■ **Close decision: PASS — ready to close** - Scope contract honored (single doc, 3+/3-). - All 5 prior-stage exit reports converge (Stage 1 root cause → Stage 5 push verification all PASS). - 3-way SHA match on origin + slide2 + local. - No regression risk against IMP-25, external-ref, content_editor archive-verdict, or PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP cross-ref. - No unresolved blockers within IMP-21 scope. ```yaml issue: 21 stage: 6 stage_name: final_close round: 1 decision: PASS issue_body_reread: title: "IMP-21 G2 — audit §1 lens B-1/B-2 column 정정" scope_match: exact guardrail_match: exact (doc-only, §1 표 only, cross-ref 정합) dependency: none (honored) commit_on_origin: sha: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac parent: 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1 origin_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac slide2_main: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac local_head: 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac three_way_match: true subject: "docs(#21): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1/B-2 content_editor.py 오기재 제거" goal_vs_result: spec_edits_required: 3 spec_edits_applied: 3 diff_stat: "1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)" file: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md scope_creep: none axis_preservation: imp25_pipeline_py: preserved (L104) external_ref_geulbeot: preserved (L105) content_editor_archive_verdict: preserved (L642/L643/L677/L679/L687) cross_ref_phase_q_insight_map: untouched (L136) follow_up_links: - IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision) — separate axis - external-ref precision (글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx) — separate axis - content_editor.py §2.6 archive execution — separate axis - AI repair fallback (G3) reuse evaluation — separate axis - PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L136 historical note — sufficient as-is labels: current: [needs-codex-review] recommended_on_close: remove needs-codex-review close_decision: close close_reason: scope-contract honored, 3-way SHA match, no regression, no unresolved blockers guardrails_honored: - scope_lock_single_file: PASS - one_commit_one_decision_unit: PASS - factual_verification (value+path+upstream): PASS - scope_qualified_verification: PASS - workflow_atomicity_rules: PASS - no_hardcoding: PASS (doc-only edit) - no_imp25_drift: PASS - no_external_ref_drift: PASS - no_archive_verdict_drift: PASS evidence: commands_run: - "git log -1 --format='%H %s' 5590ef2" - "git diff --stat 5590ef2^..5590ef2 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md" - "git diff 5590ef2^..5590ef2 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md" - "git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main" - "git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main" - "git rev-parse HEAD" - "curl gitea API issue 21 (state + labels)" - "grep -n 'content_editor.py|pipeline.py|fmt_slide|B-1|B-2' docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md" files_checked: - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md verified_facts: - L104 B-1 row: only `pipeline.py` in 후보 파일 column - L105 B-2 row: only `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` in 후보 파일 column - L125 module list: `content_editor.py` bare (no annotation) - L642/L643/L677/L679/L687: §2.6 G2 self-catch preserved - 3-way SHA = 5590ef2 unresolved_questions: [] source_comment_ids: - "[Claude #2] Stage 1 — problem review (Round 2)" - "[Claude #3] Stage 3 — code-edit close" - "[Claude #4] Stage 4 — test-verify close" - "[Codex #4] Stage 5 — commit/push verification R1" ``` next_step: issue_21_close (remove `needs-codex-review` label, close as completed). IMP-25 axis stays as separate issue; external-ref precision stays as separate axis pending user trigger.
Kyeongmin commented 2026-05-20 13:32:30 +09:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

[Codex #N] Stage 6 final independent verification for issue #21.

Close decision: PASS. The committed result matches the issue scope and the prior stage contracts.

=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:

  • git rev-parse HEAD
  • git log -1 --pretty=format:"%H%n%P%n%s"
  • git diff --name-only HEAD^ HEAD
  • git diff --stat HEAD^ HEAD
  • git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main
  • git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main
  • rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py|fmt_slide\.py|pipeline\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • git status --short
  • git diff --cached --name-only

Files checked:

  • docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md
  • D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt

Verified facts:

  • Local HEAD is 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac.
  • Parent commit is 134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1.
  • origin/main is 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac.
  • slide2/main is 5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac.
  • The committed file set is exactly docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.
  • The committed diff stat is exactly 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-).
  • In docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104, the B-1 row keeps pipeline.py and no longer lists content_editor.py.
  • In docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:105, the B-2 row keeps the external fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx reference and no longer lists content_editor.py.
  • In docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:125, the module-list entry remains content_editor.py without the B-1/B-2 annotation.
  • The historical G2 self-catch lines for content_editor.py remain present at docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:642, :643, :677, :679, and :687.
  • git diff --cached --name-only is empty.
  • The working tree contains unrelated untracked files, but no staged files and no tracked post-commit drift were found for this issue scope.
  • Full pytest was not run because the current Stage 6 prompt explicitly says not to run full pytest unless the stage task requires it.

FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES

[Codex #N] Stage 6 final independent verification for issue #21. Close decision: PASS. The committed result matches the issue scope and the prior stage contracts. === EVIDENCE === Commands run: - `git rev-parse HEAD` - `git log -1 --pretty=format:"%H%n%P%n%s"` - `git diff --name-only HEAD^ HEAD` - `git diff --stat HEAD^ HEAD` - `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` - `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main` - `rg -n "\*\*B-1\*\*|\*\*B-2\*\*|content_editor\.py|fmt_slide\.py|pipeline\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `git status --short` - `git diff --cached --name-only` Files checked: - `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` - `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt` Verified facts: - Local HEAD is `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac`. - Parent commit is `134f52d3d39b5f81dd2f6cde044e8e823d8840c1`. - `origin/main` is `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac`. - `slide2/main` is `5590ef20b56d4206c393d4d2ca0b2b298dbee5ac`. - The committed file set is exactly `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`. - The committed diff stat is exactly `1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)`. - In `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104`, the B-1 row keeps `pipeline.py` and no longer lists `content_editor.py`. - In `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:105`, the B-2 row keeps the external `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` reference and no longer lists `content_editor.py`. - In `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:125`, the module-list entry remains `content_editor.py` without the B-1/B-2 annotation. - The historical G2 self-catch lines for `content_editor.py` remain present at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:642`, `:643`, `:677`, `:679`, and `:687`. - `git diff --cached --name-only` is empty. - The working tree contains unrelated untracked files, but no staged files and no tracked post-commit drift were found for this issue scope. - Full pytest was not run because the current Stage 6 prompt explicitly says not to run full pytest unless the stage task requires it. FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
blocked
closed
implemented
needs-claude-review
needs-codex-review
ready-for-implementation
scope-locked
verified
No Label needs-codex-review
Milestone
No items
No Milestone B-3 §3 audit §1 mapping correction (5)
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
Kyeongmin
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2#21
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?