[검토결과] Codex - closed issue output review after AUDIT-02/P5b
Scope
This review checks the closed issues completed after the previous full closed-issue audit. The question is whether those completed outputs are aligned with the requested 22-step / Phase Z improvement direction, or whether they introduce unrelated, harmful, misleading, or scope-breaking changes.
Previously reviewed / older closure sets are not re-litigated here:
#2~#20, #45~#54
Overall Verdict
No evidence was found that the reviewed closed issues intentionally or accidentally redirect the project away from the requested 22-step Phase Z improvement direction.
No evidence was found for:
harmful bypasses
disabling verification to force success
unrelated Phase Q runtime pollution
new normal-path AI calls
hardcoded sample-only behavior for test passing
silent closure of runtime work as if code had landed, except where the issue explicitly closed as doc/deferred/governance work
The reviewed issues fall into four normal categories:
J3 cleanup was not falsely implemented. It was reclassified pending -> deferred with dual-precondition trigger. Must remain tracked by dormant/deferred governance.
The reviewed closed issues are consistent with their stated scopes. No evidence was found that they perform unrelated, harmful, or misleading work against the requested 22-step Phase Z improvement direction. Continue #39~#42, then review their closed outputs separately.
# [검토결과] Codex - closed issue output review after AUDIT-02/P5b
## Scope
This review checks the closed issues completed after the previous full closed-issue audit. The question is whether those completed outputs are aligned with the requested 22-step / Phase Z improvement direction, or whether they introduce unrelated, harmful, misleading, or scope-breaking changes.
Reviewed closed issues:
- #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28
- #38
- #56, #57, #58
- related local tooling hardening commit: `5d23b74 fix(orchestrator): P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle`
Excluded because they were still open at check time:
- #39, #40, #41, #42, #55
Previously reviewed / older closure sets are not re-litigated here:
- #2~#20, #45~#54
## Overall Verdict
No evidence was found that the reviewed closed issues intentionally or accidentally redirect the project away from the requested 22-step Phase Z improvement direction.
No evidence was found for:
- harmful bypasses
- disabling verification to force success
- unrelated Phase Q runtime pollution
- new normal-path AI calls
- hardcoded sample-only behavior for test passing
- silent closure of runtime work as if code had landed, except where the issue explicitly closed as doc/deferred/governance work
The reviewed issues fall into four normal categories:
1. doc correction: #21~#25
2. deferred/doc-status correction: #26
3. code refactor or frontend bridge: #27, #28, #38
4. audit / doc-sync / dormant-trigger governance / local orchestrator hardening: #56, #57, #58, P5b
## Issue-by-Issue Review
| Issue | Result Type | Commit / Evidence | Verdict | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #21 IMP-21 | doc correction | `5590ef2`, tests 337 passed | OK | PHASE-Q-AUDIT B-1/B-2 content_editor mapping correction. Runtime impact not expected. |
| #22 IMP-22 | doc correction | `2ace54b`, tests 337 passed | OK | Renderer A-3/A-4 audit lens correction. Runtime impact not expected. |
| #23 IMP-23 | doc correction | `447e702`, tests 337 passed | OK | html_generator A-3/A-4 audit lens correction. Runtime impact not expected. |
| #24 IMP-24 | doc correction | `b1897c0`, tests 342 passed | OK | block_reference/block_selector A-2 mapping marked as indirect reference. P5b smoke path continued correctly from Stage 3. |
| #25 IMP-25 | doc correction | `a71355e`, tests 342 passed | OK | pipeline B-1 candidate-file column correction. Scope matches doc-only intent. |
| #26 IMP-26 | deferred/doc-status | `2896bb6` | OK with note | J3 cleanup was not falsely implemented. It was reclassified pending -> deferred with dual-precondition trigger. Must remain tracked by dormant/deferred governance. |
| #27 IMP-27 | code refactor | `909bf75`, targeted 23 passed, broad 365 passed | OK | shared catalog loader / get-by-id cleanup via `src/catalog.py`; tests added. Scope matches cleanup axis. |
| #28 IMP-28 | code refactor | `265d70e`, targeted 9 passed | OK | `_parse_json` dedup via `src/json_utils.py`; consumers updated. Scope matches cleanup axis. |
| #38 IMP-29 | frontend bridge | `b4872ba`, tests 374 passed | OK | frontend zone-level evidence bridge. Changes limited to `Front/client/*`; deterministic bridge is aligned with destination. |
| #56 AUDIT-02 | audit/reconcile | `101143e`, baseline 307 passed | OK | reconciled IMP-07 / backlog / IMP-16-U2 deferred conflict. No runtime behavior change. |
| #57 DOC-SYNC | doc sync | `8c1e563`, tests 307 passed | OK | added AUDIT-02 cross-reference banner to IMP-16-U2 design doc. Prevents silent stale deferred state. |
| #58 P5 guard | governance/tooling | `134f52d`, tests 337 passed | OK | added dormant trigger registry / checker / orchestrator gate. Reduces human-memory dependency. |
| P5b local tool fix | orchestrator hardening | `5d23b74`, tests 131/131 passed | OK | first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle. This is local pipeline tooling hardening, not Phase Z runtime behavior. |
## Risk Checks
### Scope alignment
The reviewed issue outputs match their stated scopes.
- #21~#25 are doc-only audit lens corrections.
- #27/#28 are small shared-helper refactors with tests.
- #38 is frontend-only bridge work.
- #56/#57/#58/P5b are audit/tooling/governance work.
No suspicious scope drift was found.
### Harmful or misleading behavior
No direct evidence found for:
- disabling tests or validators to pass
- forcing fallback success without evidence
- changing Phase Q runtime behavior for Phase Z convenience
- adding normal-path AI calls
- hiding incomplete runtime work as implemented code
### Closed-but-not-runtime cases
These are acceptable where the issue scope itself was doc/audit/governance/deferred:
- #21~#25: doc correction completed.
- #26: deferred status explicitly recorded. Needs future trigger tracking, not immediate runtime implementation.
- #56/#57: audit/doc-sync completed.
- #58/P5b: tooling/governance completed.
### Open follow-up area
As of the check, these remain open and should be reviewed only after closure:
- #39 IMP-30
- #40 IMP-31
- #41 IMP-32
- #42 IMP-04b
- #55 IMP-20 runtime deferred
## Recommendations
1. After #39~#42 close, run the same closed-output review again because those are higher-impact runtime/catalog axes.
2. Keep #26 under dormant/deferred trigger governance so it does not become another hidden stale item.
3. Treat any future P5b `detect_agent` supplement or STOP event as a review trigger for that issue.
4. Maintain closure taxonomy: code-reflect / doc-correction / deferred-with-trigger / audit-only / tooling-only.
## Evidence
Read-only checks used:
- Gitea closed issue list for #21~#28, #38, #56~#58
- Gitea state check for #39, #40, #41, #42, #55
- `git log --oneline -n 25`
- `git show --stat --oneline --name-only b1897c0 a71355e 2896bb6 909bf75 265d70e b4872ba 101143e 8c1e563 134f52d 5d23b74`
Final conclusion:
The reviewed closed issues are consistent with their stated scopes. No evidence was found that they perform unrelated, harmful, or misleading work against the requested 22-step Phase Z improvement direction. Continue #39~#42, then review their closed outputs separately.
Kyeongmin
changed title from [????]codex ? closed issue output review after AUDIT-02/P5b to [검토결과]codex - closed issue output review after AUDIT-02/P5b2026-05-20 22:59:15 +09:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
[검토결과] Codex - closed issue output review after AUDIT-02/P5b
Scope
This review checks the closed issues completed after the previous full closed-issue audit. The question is whether those completed outputs are aligned with the requested 22-step / Phase Z improvement direction, or whether they introduce unrelated, harmful, misleading, or scope-breaking changes.
Reviewed closed issues:
5d23b74 fix(orchestrator): P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttleExcluded because they were still open at check time:
Previously reviewed / older closure sets are not re-litigated here:
Overall Verdict
No evidence was found that the reviewed closed issues intentionally or accidentally redirect the project away from the requested 22-step Phase Z improvement direction.
No evidence was found for:
The reviewed issues fall into four normal categories:
Issue-by-Issue Review
5590ef2, tests 337 passed2ace54b, tests 337 passed447e702, tests 337 passedb1897c0, tests 342 passeda71355e, tests 342 passed2896bb6909bf75, targeted 23 passed, broad 365 passedsrc/catalog.py; tests added. Scope matches cleanup axis.265d70e, targeted 9 passed_parse_jsondedup viasrc/json_utils.py; consumers updated. Scope matches cleanup axis.b4872ba, tests 374 passedFront/client/*; deterministic bridge is aligned with destination.101143e, baseline 307 passed8c1e563, tests 307 passed134f52d, tests 337 passed5d23b74, tests 131/131 passedRisk Checks
Scope alignment
The reviewed issue outputs match their stated scopes.
No suspicious scope drift was found.
Harmful or misleading behavior
No direct evidence found for:
Closed-but-not-runtime cases
These are acceptable where the issue scope itself was doc/audit/governance/deferred:
Open follow-up area
As of the check, these remain open and should be reviewed only after closure:
Recommendations
detect_agentsupplement or STOP event as a review trigger for that issue.Evidence
Read-only checks used:
git log --oneline -n 25git show --stat --oneline --name-only b1897c0 a71355e 2896bb6 909bf75 265d70e b4872ba 101143e 8c1e563 134f52d 5d23b74Final conclusion:
The reviewed closed issues are consistent with their stated scopes. No evidence was found that they perform unrelated, harmful, or misleading work against the requested 22-step Phase Z improvement direction. Continue #39~#42, then review their closed outputs separately.
[????]codex ? closed issue output review after AUDIT-02/P5bto [검토결과]codex - closed issue output review after AUDIT-02/P5b변화될 것 없음. 검증 완