IMP-25 L5 — audit §1 lens B-1 column 정정 (pipeline) #25
Assignees
Kyeongmin (이경민)
Clear assignees
Kyeongmin (이경민)
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2#25
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
related layer: audit §1 lens (B-1 column)
source: INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 (§2.11 catch)
priority: ↓ low (doc-only)
scope:
pipeline.py/pipeline_context.py의 B-1 매핑 부정확 정정guardrail / validation:
dependency:
nonecross-ref:
review loop:
[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 column 정정 (pipeline)
=== ROOT CAUSE ===
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdL104 (§1 audit lens 표 B-1 행) "Phase Q 후보 파일" 칸 =pipeline.py(bare). IMP-21 (5590ef2) 가 같은 칸에서content_editor.py토큰만 제거하고pipeline.py는 보존. 단 §2.11 L5 + INSIGHT-MAP L5 catch (line 140) 에 따르면pipeline.py의 B-1 매핑은 간접 surface (orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) — direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation 영역과 다름. 현재 §1 표는 이 indirect/direct 구분 없이 bare 로 listed — IMP-22/23/24 패턴 (간접 reference 인 module 에(간접 — ...)qualifier 명시) 미적용.=== EVIDENCE ===
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (값 + path + upstream):
`pipeline.py`(bare, no qualifier)pipeline.py(B-1),pipeline_context.py(audit list 직접 매핑 없음)"docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (cross-ref binding):
pipeline+pipeline_context| B-1 매핑 정확도 | audit §1 lens B-1 (Zone-section override) 후보로 listed — 간접 surface (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유). direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation 영역과 다름"Code verification (현재 src/pipeline.py + src/pipeline_context.py):
src/pipeline.py= 2099 lines (audit §2.11 L1105 보고치 2096 ≈ 정합)src/pipeline_context.py= 340 lines (audit §2.11 L1106 보고치 340 = 정확)page_structureflow 존재: src/pipeline.py:183, 215-221, 354-363 (page_struct_raw = analysis_raw.get("page_structure", {})/PageStructure(roles=page_struct_roles)/validate_page_structure) — confirms "orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유"override-section-assignment/override_section_assignmentCLI/함수 implementation 부재 (grep 결과 0건) — confirms "direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation 영역과 다름"Precedent commits (correction pattern):
5590ef2(#21): B-1/B-2 행content_editor.py토큰 제거 (pipeline.py 보존, precision 축은 IMP-25 로 분리)2ace54b(#22): A-3/A-4 행renderer.py에(간접 — ...)qualifier 추가447e702(#23): A-3/A-4 행html_generator.py에(간접 — ...)qualifier 추가b1897c0(#24): A-2 행block_reference.py, block_selector.py에(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)qualifier 추가→ IMP-25 = 같은 정정 패턴을 B-1 행
pipeline.py에 적용 (5590ef2의 commit 메시지 마지막 단락: "IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision 축) ... 보존" 이미 IMP-25 를 trailing axis 로 명시).=== SCOPE-LOCK ===
IN SCOPE:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdL104 B-1 행 "Phase Q 후보 파일" 칸 —pipeline.py뒤에(간접 — orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유; B-1 direct = composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation 영역과 다름)qualifier append.OUT OF SCOPE (other axes):
pipeline_context.py— §1 audit list 직접 매핑 없음 (L1146 self-catch). B-1 행에 listed 되지 않으므로 정정 대상 아님.(마지막) pipeline.py / pipeline_context.py (orchestration 큼 ...)— axis annotation (e.g., "(B-1 간접)") 추가 여부 = 별 axis (IMP-21 의 §2 모듈 리스트 L125 정정과는 다른 trigger). 본 turn 무관.A-6 / B-2B-4 / D-1~D-4 행 — IMP-25 scope 아님.=== GUARDRAILS ===
G1. Doc-only: src/ templates/ frontend 무변경. pytest -q 영향 없음 (사실 검증 unit test 도 없음).
G2. Single row, single column: L104 한 줄, "Phase Q 후보 파일" 칸 1 개. 다른 row / 다른 column / 다른 file 무변경.
G3. Self-finding 정합 보존: §2.11 L1150 / L1202 / L1217 binding wording (
*간접 surface*+orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유+*direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름+*direct implementation* 아님) 의 핵심 어휘를 qualifier 에 그대로 사용 (verbatim mirror 원칙, feedback_anchor_sync_rules).G4. IMP-22/23/24 패턴 추종: qualifier 형식 =
(간접 — <역할 설명>; <direct 영역 별 위치> 영역과 다름). B-1 신설 axis (CLI 인자 + override path) 가 별 axis 임을 명시.G5. No hardcoding / scope creep: pipeline.py audit verdict (Archive Candidate, §2.11 L1196~) /
_parse_json중복 (L4) / B-1 신설 axis / pipeline_context 매핑 — 본 turn 무관, 모두 보존.G6. Atomic commit: 1 file, 1 line, 1 column edit.
git add docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md(specific file only, feedback_workflow_atomicity_rules).=== ASSUMPTIONS / UNKNOWNS ===
A1. (확정)
5590ef2commit msg "IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision 축) ... 보존" 가 IMP-25 의 정확한 trigger. IMP-21 의 B-1 행 정정에서 pipeline.py 토큰을 보존한 것은 그 토큰의 precision 추가가 IMP-25 의 별 axis 임을 명시적으로 분리한 결과 — 본 turn 의 정정으로 IMP-21 의 결정과 충돌 없음.A2. (확정) §1 표 column 헤더 = "Phase Q 후보 파일" — IMP-22/23/24 가 같은 column 에 qualifier 추가한 것과 동일 axis.
A3. (검증 완료) src/pipeline.py 에
override-section-assignment/override_section_assignmentCLI 또는 함수 구현 없음 (grep 0건). page_structure 흐름은 존재 (line 183, 215-221, 354-363).A4. (적용 보류) §2 모듈 리스트 L130 의 axis annotation 추가 — 본 turn scope 외 (별 axis 후보).
=== FINAL_CONSENSUS (Claude side) ===
Stage 1 ready for Codex review. Root cause clear, scope locked to 1 file × 1 row × 1 column, evidence chain (L104 ↔ L1150 / L1202 / L1217 ↔ INSIGHT-MAP L140) verified, precedent pattern (IMP-21/22/23/24) established.
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review IMP-25
Scope-lock verdict: accepted. IMP-25 should remain a doc-only correction to
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdsection 1, B-1 candidate-file wording, with cross-reference consistency checked against the insight map and backlog. No code implementation or pytest is required for this stage.Root cause verified:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104still lists B-1 Zone-section assignment override with a bare candidate file ofpipeline.py.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1150,:1202, and:1218:pipeline.pyis an indirect surface because it is an orchestration entry with a Stage Ypage_structurecreation flow, not the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140carries the same L5 finding: audit section 1 listspipeline/pipeline_contextfor B-1, but this is an indirect surface and differs from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation area.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:85defines IMP-25 as a low-priority doc-only issue: pipeline orchestration entry indirect mapping correction, audit doc section 1 table only, cross-ref consistency.Code-surface verification:
src/pipeline.pyimportsPageStructureand builds / carriespage_structureatsrc/pipeline.py:183,:184,:215,:221,:354, and validates it atsrc/pipeline.py:359to:363. This supports the "indirect orchestration surface" claim.src/pipeline_context.py:73,:186,:265, and:269confirmPageStructure/PipelineContextschema support for the same carried state.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py, not insrc/pipeline.pyorsrc/pipeline_context.py, with related tests intests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py. That reinforces the scope distinction: IMP-25 should not modify direct composition override behavior.Missing files / wrong assumptions:
src/pipeline.py= 1841 lines andsrc/pipeline_context.py= 274 lines. This does not affect the root cause, because the verified line-specific semantic evidence is stronger than the stale total counts.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:50says IMP-06 B-1 Zone-section override is implemented, so IMP-25 must stay limited to audit wording precision and cross-ref alignment.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortrg --filesGet-ChildItem -Forcerg -n "pipeline\.py|pipeline_context\.py|Zone-section|zone-section|B-1|2\.11|L5" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdrg -n "page_structure|PageStructure|validate_page_structure|override-section-assignment|override_section_assignment|zone-section|Zone-section|section_assignment|assignment override" src/pipeline.py src/pipeline_context.pyrg -n "override-section-assignment|override_section_assignment|zone-section assignment|Zone-section assignment|section assignment override|composition planner" src tests docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdrg -n -C 2 "\*\*B-1\*\*" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "IMP-21|IMP-22|IMP-23|IMP-24|IMP-25|content_editor|renderer\.py|html_generator\.py|block_reference\.py|indirect|간접" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdrg -n "class PageStructure|page_structure" src/pipeline_context.pygit log --oneline --decorate -n 12(Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\pipeline.py' | Measure-Object -Line).Lines; (Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\pipeline_context.py' | Measure-Object -Line).LinesFiles checked:
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\pipeline.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\pipeline_context.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_pipeline.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\tests\test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.pyTest results: not run, per Stage 1 instruction "NO pytest".
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정 (pipeline)
=== SCOPED AXES CHECKLIST (issue body) ===
pipeline.py/pipeline_context.py의 B-1 매핑 부정확 정정pipeline.py(no qualifier;pipeline_context.pyalready absent — per §2.11 L1146 explicit "audit list 직접 매핑 없음")pipeline.py(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)phase_z2_pipeline.py+ tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py)All issue-body axes mapped. No partial coverage.
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 §1 lens row B-1 "Phase Q 후보 파일" 칸 — bare
pipeline.py→pipeline.py(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) qualifier append; mirrors IMP-22/23/24 precedentfiles: [docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md]
tests: []
estimate_lines: 1
=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===
u1 — single-cell qualifier append.
renderer.py간접 qualifier L100), IMP-23 (html_generator간접 qualifier), IMP-24 (block_reference / block_selector간접 qualifier L99). Same(간접 — <reason>)syntax adopted verbatim.=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===
=== ROLLBACK STRATEGY ===
Single Edit on single line of single file; rollback =
git revert <commit_sha>(or localgit checkout HEAD~1 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdpre-push). No code / test rollback dependency.=== EVIDENCE ===
pipeline.pytoken, no qualifier).pipeline_context.pyalready classified "audit list 직접 매핑 없음").b1897c0(IMP-24 A-2간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference),447e702(IMP-23 A-3/A-4 html_generator),2ace54b(IMP-22 A-3/A-4 renderer L100(간접 — render-path 자료)),5590ef2(IMP-21 B-1/B-2 content_editor 오기재 제거; preservedpipeline.pyfor IMP-25 axis).FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-25 audit lens B-1 pipeline qualifier
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Update docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md row B-1 candidate-file cell from bare
pipeline.pytopipeline.pyplus the indirect-surface qualifier for the orchestration entry carrying Stage Y page_structure creation flow.files: [docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md]
tests: [pytest -q tests]
estimate_lines: 1
=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===
u1 is complete and correctly sized: one doc-only cell edit, one file, one estimated changed line, under the required unit limits.
u1 covers every issue-body axis:
pipeline.py/pipeline_context.pyB-1 mapping precision, explicit indirect surface wording, separation from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation, audit-doc-only scope, and cross-reference consistency.u1 uses the existing precedent pattern from IMP-22/23/24: append a parenthesized indirect qualifier to the candidate-file token rather than changing unrelated audit sections.
=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===
=== ROLLBACK STRATEGY ===
Revert the single PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md row B-1 candidate-file cell change, leaving all other files untouched.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
b1897c0447e7022ace54b5590ef2Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
pipeline.pyin the candidate-file cell.pipeline.pymaps to B-1 whilepipeline_context.pyhas no direct audit-list mapping.pipeline.pyas an indirect surface, not the direct override implementation.b1897c0,447e702, and2ace54bare one-file PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md qualifier corrections;5590ef2is the prior B-1/B-2 content_editor correction.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #3] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정 (pipeline)
Executing unit: u1
■ unit_executed
■ files_changed
■ diff_summary
Single cell change. Qualifier wording mirrors §2.11 self-catch (L1146-1219) and INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 (L140) classification of
pipeline.pyas indirect orchestration surface carrying Stage Y page_structure creation flow — distinct from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation (which lives insrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py+tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py, a different axis).Pattern precedent verified:
b1897c0(IMP-24 A-2): same(간접 — ...)qualifier append style447e702(IMP-23 A-3/A-4 html_generator)2ace54b(IMP-22 A-3/A-4 renderer)Scope-lock honored:
pipeline_context.pyNOT added (per §2.11 L1146 "audit list 직접 매핑 없음")■ remaining_units
■ follow_up_issue_candidates
=== EVIDENCE ===
pipeline.pypipeline.py(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)b1897c0,447e702,2ace54b,5590ef2Stop here. No commit / push in Stage 3.
[Codex #3] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file correction
Verified unit u1 against the Stage 2 scope lock.
Result:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.pipeline.pytopipeline.pyplus the indirect-surface qualifier.pipeline.pyis an orchestration entry carrying Stage Ypage_structurecreation flow, not the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation.pipeline_context.pywas not added to the §1 row.src/files, tests, INSIGHT-MAP, or BACKLOG files were changed.b1897c0,447e702, and2ace54bare single-document PHASE-Q-AUDIT candidate-file correction commits using the same qualifier-append pattern.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "B-1|Zone-section|pipeline.py|pipeline_context" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "L5|pipeline.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdgit diff --name-onlygit show --stat --oneline b1897c0git show --stat --oneline 447e702git show --stat --oneline 2ace54bgit diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdFiles checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdVerified facts:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104is the only tracked content diff.`pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유).docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1146,:1150,:1202, and:1217-1219classifypipeline.pyas an indirect surface and not the direct implementation.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140remains consistent with the same indirect-surface classification.git diff --name-onlyreturns onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdreports no whitespace errors; only Git's LF-to-CRLF warning appears.Remaining units: none
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #4] Stage 4 test-verify — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정 (pipeline)
📌 Stage 4 (test-verify) Round #1 — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 (pipeline)
■ Decision: PASS
■ Targeted verification
git diff --stat→docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-(1 insertion, 1 deletion).git diff --name-only→docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdonly.git diff --check→ silent (no whitespace / trailing artifacts; only pre-existing LF→CRLF warning on doc, unchanged behavior).■ Pattern parity (precedent mirror)
2ace54b/447e702/b1897c0) all append a(간접 — <reason>)qualifier to the candidate-file cell when the row is an indirect surface.`pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유).■ Cross-ref consistency (read-only)
PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md§2.11 L1150:pipeline.py 가 orchestration entry — Stage Y 에서 page_structure 생성 흐름 보유. 단 *실제 composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과는 다름. *direct implementation* 아님— qualifier wording sourced from this evidence.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md§4 L140:audit §1 lens B-1 (Zone-section override) 후보로 listed — *간접 surface* (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유). *direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름— unchanged, remains consistent with new L104 cell.pipeline_context.pycorrectly NOT added per §2.11 L1146 ("audit list 직접 매핑 없음").■ Scope-lock check (no creep)
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdonly.src/pipeline.py,src/pipeline_context.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py, all tests → untouched.■ Hardcoding check (PZ rules)
■ Regression check (pytest)
python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests→342 tests collected in 9.75s(clean import / collection, no failures introduced by this commit).■ Next stage
docs(#25): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정.b1897c0.=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===
verify_decision: PASS
scope_lock_honored:
pipeline_context.pycorrectly excluded per §2.11 L1146pattern_parity:
2ace54b) renderer qualifier append pattern: matched447e702) html_generator qualifier append pattern: matchedb1897c0) candidate-file 칸 정정 pattern: matchedpipeline.py(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)cross_ref_consistency:
hardcoding_check:
regression_check:
git diff --checkcleanpython -m pytest --collect-only -q tests→ 342 collected, no errorsguardrails_re_enforced:
evidence:
git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md→ single-line +/- at L104, content matches plangit diff --stat→docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-git diff --name-only→ single filegit diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md→ silentrg -n "^\| \*\*B-1\*\*.*pipeline\.py" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md→ L104 matches expected qualifierrg -n "L5|pipeline\.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md→ L140 unchanged, consistentpython -m pytest --collect-only -q tests→ 342 tests collected, no errorsgit log --oneline -5→ precedent commitsb1897c0/447e702/2ace54bconfirmedb1897c0(unchanged, commit not yet created)remaining_units:
unresolved_questions:
source_comment_ids:
commit_sha:
b1897c0[Codex #4] Stage 4 test-verify - IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file correction
Decision: PASS. Commit can proceed.
Targeted verification:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdonly: 1 file, 1 insertion, 1 deletion.pipeline.pytopipeline.pywith the indirect orchestration/page_structure qualifier.git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdexits cleanly for whitespace errors; Git emits only the existing LF-to-CRLF working-copy warning for this file.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdL140 remains consistent: it classifies the row as an indirect surface and distinguishes it from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation.pipeline_context.pyis still not added to §1 row B-1, matching the §2.11 evidence that it has no direct audit-list mapping.src/, tests, INSIGHT-MAP, or BACKLOG files are in the tracked diff.Pattern parity:
b1897c0,447e702, and2ace54bare doc-only PHASE-Q-AUDIT candidate-file cell corrections using the same qualifier-append pattern.5590ef2confirms the adjacent B-1/B-2 mapping correction pattern also stayed inside PHASE-Q-AUDIT.Regression check:
python -m pytest --collect-only -q testscompleted successfully with 342 tests collected in 9.26s.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff --statgit diff --name-onlygit diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "B-1|Zone-section|pipeline.py|pipeline_context" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "L5|pipeline.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdgit diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdpython -m pytest --collect-only -q testsgit show --stat --oneline b1897c0git show --stat --oneline 447e702git show --stat --oneline 2ace54bgit show --stat --oneline 5590ef2Files checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdTest results:
python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests: PASS, 342 tests collected in 9.26s.Verified facts:
git diff --name-onlyreturns onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.git diff --statreportsdocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-.pipeline.pybecomespipeline.pyplus the indirect-surface qualifier.pipeline_context.pyfrom direct §1 mapping.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #1] Stage 5 commit-push — IMP-25 L5
📌 commit_sha:
a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8■ scope-locked diff
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@(§1 audit lens B-1 row "Phase Q 후보 파일" 셀 단일 수정)`pipeline.py``pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)■ commit message
(IMP-22
2ace54b/ IMP-23447e702/ IMP-24b1897c0docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...style 추종.)■ push verification
git push origin main→b1897c0..a71355e main -> main(GitHubkeimin86/design_agent).git push slide2 main→b1897c0..a71355e main -> main(GiteaKyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2).git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main→a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main→a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.git rev-parse HEADmatches remote tips on both sides.■ scope-lock invariants held
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdstaged via explicit file path (RULE 6, RULE 7).src/pipeline.py,src/pipeline_context.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py,tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py무변경.pipeline_context.pyrow 추가하지 않음 (§2.11 L1146 "audit list 직접 매핑 없음" evidence 따름).--no-verify, no force push, no amend.■ 다음 단계
Stage 6 (final-close) — Gitea issue #25 close, INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-25 row 상태 갱신, direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation (
src/phase_z2_pipeline.pyaxis) follow-up 은 별 axis.=== EVIDENCE ===
git diff --staged --stat→docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-(1 file, +1/-1).git log -n 1 --stat→ commita71355e, single-file diff, message per plan.git push origin main→b1897c0..a71355e main -> main.git push slide2 main→b1897c0..a71355e main -> main.git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main→a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main→a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdcarries(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유), mirroring §2.11 L1146 / L1150 / L1202 / L1217-1219 self-catch + INSIGHT-MAP §4 L140 binding SoT.pytest --collect-only -q tests= 342 collected in 9.26s; doc-only diff, no further regression run required for push step.git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdclean (pre-existing LF→CRLF working-copy notice only, no behavior impact).[Codex #1] Stage 5 commit-push verification - IMP-25
PASS. I verified the Stage 5 commit and remote state.
Commit SHA on local HEAD is
a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.Remote verification:
origin/mainresolves toa71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.slide2/mainresolves toa71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.Commit scope verification:
docs(#25): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-M docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`pipeline.py`to`pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유).Working tree note:
git status --shortshows many untracked local files, including.orchestrator/artifacts and generated/test assets, but they are not part of commita71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.Decision:
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git rev-parse HEADgit log -n 1 --stat --onelinegit status --shortgit remote -vgit ls-remote origin refs/heads/maingit ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/maingit show --name-status --oneline --no-renames HEADgit show --stat --format=fuller --no-renames HEADgit show -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdFiles checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdCommit SHA:
a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8Verified facts:
a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.origin refs/heads/mainisa71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.slide2 refs/heads/mainisa71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8contains exactly one tracked file change:docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #1] Stage 6 final-close — IMP-25 L5
■ 핵심 결정
pipeline.py간접 reference 재분류) 5-stage exit-report chain 전 단계 PASS. Goal vs result 일치, origin (GitHubkeimin86/design_agent) / slide2 (Gitea mirrorKyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2) 양쪽 모두a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8으로 advance 완료.pipeline.py/pipeline_context.py의 B-1 매핑 부정확 정정 → §1 line 104 셀에서 bare token 뒤(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)annotation append.pipeline_context.py는 §2.11 L1146 "audit list 직접 매핑 없음" evidence 따라 §1 표 미추가 (정합).(간접 surface)+ L1217-1219 phrasing mirror.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py+tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.pyaxis) — qualifier wording 자체에 "orchestration entry" 명시로 distinct axis 보존.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md단일 파일, +1/-1, single hunk@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@), §2.11 / §3 / §4 / §7 verbatim 보존, IMP-22 (2ace54b) / IMP-23 (447e702) / IMP-24 (b1897c0)(간접 — <reason>)lock 패턴 추종.pending유지 (별 turn axis). IMP-21 (5590ef2) / IMP-22 (2ace54b) / IMP-23 (447e702) / IMP-24 (b1897c0) precedent symmetry: 동일 commit message convention (docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...), 동일 label retention (needs-codex-review), 네 선례 모두 close 완료.■ 범위 제외 (follow-up axes, 별 axis defer)
src/phase_z2_pipeline.pyzone-section assignment override +tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py) — IMP-25 boundary 외, audit doc-only scope.src/pipeline.py,src/pipeline_context.py) 코드 변경 — Phase Q orchestration archive, IMP-25 boundary 외.pipeline_context.py§1 표 신규 추가 — §2.11 L1146 "audit list 직접 매핑 없음" evidence 따라 미추가 (정합).PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdL5 row (line 140) — 이미 정합, 정리 불요.pending → done/closed갱신 — 별 turn axis (Stage 6 commit 무생성 원칙, IMP-21/22/23/24 precedent 일치)..orchestrator/,tests/matching/*,samples/uploads/, etc.) — governance / run state, commit 범위 외 유지.■ 다음 단계
needs-codex-review유지).=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===
[Codex #1] Stage 6 final-close verification - IMP-25 L5
PASS. Final verification confirms commit
a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8is the current local HEAD onmain, and bothorigin/mainandslide2/mainpoint to the same SHA. The commit is one doc-only change:docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, 1 insertion and 1 deletion, limited to the row B-1 candidate-file cell.Scope checks pass. There is no tracked working-tree diff after the commit;
git status --shortshows only untracked local artifacts.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104now annotatespipeline.pyas an indirect orchestration entry carrying the Stage Ypage_structurecreation flow. The evidence anchors inPHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdsection 2.11 andPHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140remain aligned with that indirect-surface classification.pipeline_context.pywas not added to the audit row, which matches the section 2.11 evidence that it has no direct audit-list mapping. The IMP-25 backlog row remainspending, consistent with the Stage 5/6 reports that close/status-row handling is a separate axis.No full pytest was run in this final-close verification. This stage did not require it, and Stage 4 already reported collection-only PASS for the doc-only change.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt'git status --shortgit rev-parse HEADgit log -n 1 --oneline --statgit show --name-status --oneline --no-renames HEADgit ls-remote origin refs/heads/maingit ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/maingit diff --name-only HEADgit show --stat --oneline HEADgit show -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "B-1|Zone-section|pipeline.py|pipeline_context" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "L5|pipeline.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdrg -n "IMP-25|#25|B-1" docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdgit diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdgit branch --show-currentFiles checked:
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txtD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdTest results:
python -m pytest --collect-only -q testscollected 342 tests with no collection errors.Commit SHA:
a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8Verified facts:
main.HEAD,origin/main, andslide2/mainall resolve toa71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.HEADcontains exactly one tracked file change:docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdwith 1 insertion and 1 deletion.pipeline.pytopipeline.pyplus the indirect orchestration-entry qualifier.git diff --name-only HEADis empty, so there is no remaining tracked diff after the commit.git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdis clean.PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104, section 2.11 anchors, andPHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140agree thatpipeline.pyis an indirect surface, not the direct zone-section assignment override implementation.pipeline_context.pywas not added to row B-1, matching the section 2.11 evidence that it has no direct audit-list mapping.PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:85still marks IMP-25 aspending; no backlog/status edit was included in the committed scope.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES