IMP-24 K6 — audit §1 lens A-2 column 정정 #24
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
related layer: audit §1 lens (A-2 column)
source: INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 (§2.10 catch)
priority: ↓ low (doc-only)
scope:
block_reference/block_selector의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials 등록/확장 (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z catalog schema)guardrail / validation:
dependency:
nonecross-ref:
review loop:
[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-24 K6 (block_reference / block_selector A-2 column 정정)
1. Root cause
PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 audit lens row A-2 (line 99) lists the candidate-file column as:
— bare tokens with no qualification, identical in shape to direct-candidate cells like A-1 (
mdx_normalizer.py,section_parser.py) or A-5 (fit_verifier.py). This presents the two files as direct A-2 (Catalog 확장 — frame_contracts + frame_partials) candidates.That presentation contradicts the §2.10 audit body, which is the binding SoT for these two modules. Verified factually:
A-2 ... | (간접) | Phase Q catalog.yaml 로딩 / block 검색 패턴이 Phase Z catalog 확장 시 reference. 단 Phase Q catalog (block id + variant) vs Phase Z catalog (frame contract + frame partial) — schema 다름. Mapping is explicitly typed(간접), not direct.§1 audit lens 의 A-2 매핑은 *간접* (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도).K6. (factual note) — §1 audit lens 의 A-2 매핑 정확도: *간접* (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도). §1 직접 정정은 별 axis (G2 + I6 + J5 누적 + K6)— the §2.10 catch that this issue (IMP-24) is the closing axis of.§3 Salvage 적용 대상: 없음 (Salvage Candidate 0). Combined with §3-A row at line 1242 (A-2 Catalog 확장 | 없음 (§2.10 Salvage 0) | 새로 만들기 (frame_contracts + frame_partials catalog)), the A-2 main work is new construction offrame_contracts.yaml+frame_partials, not salvage from these two Phase Q files.Schema-divergence factual basis (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z catalog):
templates/blocks/catalog.yaml(block id + variant), loaded byblock_reference._load_catalogandblock_selector.load_catalog. Confirmed by §2.10 — 핵심 함수 (lines 1002, 1011).templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlentry +templates/phase_z2/frames/{template_id}.htmlpartial. Confirmed by the A-2 row's own output column at line 99._get_block_by_id(Phase Q) operates on block id keys (Reference Only — duplicated across block_reference / block_selector / §2.8 renderer); Phase Z resolvesframe_id → frame_contract. Confirmed by §2.10 (line 1030).INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 cross-ref already states the same:
audit §1 lens A-2 (Catalog 확장) 후보로 listed — *간접* (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도). A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 등록/확장 (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z catalog schema)(docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139). The §2.10 audit body and the cross-ref index agree; only the §1 lens A-2 cell lags.2. Scope-lock
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdonly`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`) of the A-2 row(간접 — ...)parenthetical, mirroring the IMP-22 (renderer.py (간접 — render-path 자료)) pattern. No removal of tokens.block_reference.pyorblock_selector.pyfrom the cell; rewording / 재배치 of §2.10 audit body; touching IMP-21 / 22 / 23 annotationsPrecedent decision (annotate vs drop):
renderer.pyprecedent (annotate with(간접 — render-path 자료)): mapping is indirect but exists → annotate, not drop.content_editor.pyprecedent (drop entirely): mapping is wholly absent (content_editor.py = slot-fill / Kei editor only) → drop.html_generator.pyprecedent (drop entirely): mapping is wholly absent (selenium import 부재 for A-3; slide-base 호출 부재 for A-4) → drop.For IMP-24, §2.10 K6 explicitly types the mapping as
*간접*(not absent), and §2.10's audit body (lines 1019, 1068–1075) keeps both files as audited Reference Only candidates whosecatalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴does have reference value for the A-2 catalog construction work. Therefore the IMP-22 (annotate) pattern applies, not the IMP-21 / 23 (drop) pattern.Proposed annotation text (verbatim, to be locked in Stage 2):
A-2 cell replacement (line 99 trailing column):
This mirrors the §2.10 — 관련 §7-B 표 (line 1023) wording verbatim ("Phase Q catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴이 Phase Z catalog 확장 시 reference. 단 Phase Q catalog (block id + variant) vs Phase Z catalog (frame contract + frame partial) — schema 다름") and the IMP-22 §1 annotation pattern, preserving the file listing (consistent with §0-A's additive cross-ref over silent removal posture) while marking the mapping indirect with schema-divergence factual basis.
3. Guardrails / validation
(A-2)preserved —10. block_reference.py / block_selector.py (A-2)stays as-is. IMP-21 precedent (which removed(B-1, B-2)from content_editor's L125 entry) applies only when the mapping is wholly absent; here the mapping is*간접*per §2.10 K6 (mapping does exist), so the §2 enumeration annotation is correct as-is. Removing it would silently break §2.10's own§1 §2 audit listline 1019 (block_reference.py / block_selector.py (A-2)).5590ef2/2ace54b/447e702). Order dependency satisfied. The IMP-22 annotation style is the precedent that applies (indirect mapping exists), not the IMP-21 / 23 token-drop precedent (mapping absent).src/block_reference.py/src/block_selector.pythemselves are not modified. Reference Only verdict (§2.10) is the audit posture; cleanup of duplication (K5 cleanup 별 axis) is a separate axis outside IMP-24 scope.`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`— verified atdocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99.(간접)— verified atdocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023(관련 §7-B 표), L1072 (후속 참고 사항), L1089 (K6 catch).docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070. §3-A confirms A-2 = "새로 만들기" with no Phase Q salvage — verified atdocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139(verbatim mirror of K6 catch).docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84(status=pending; ↓ low; doc-only).block_reference.py/block_selector.pycandidate listings exist elsewhere in §1 outside line 99 — confirmed via grep (lines listing the file tokens outside §2.10 audit body): only line 99 (A-2 row) and line 129 (§2 module enumeration). Line 129 is a §2 module list annotated with its §1 axis — kept as-is per guardrail 3. Other matches (lines 251, 786, 992, 998–1075, 1097, 1119, 1219, 1242, 1284, 1347–1350) are §2.X audit bodies / §3 / §4 sections — all out of scope.4. Stage 2 plan preview (not executed in Stage 1)
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.Edittool withold_string=`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`(sufficiently unique — only one occurrence on L99) andnew_string= the annotated form above.docs(#24): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-2 block_reference/block_selector 칸 정정.5. Review loop posture
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES/NObefore proceeding to Stage 2 plan + Stage 3 edit.stage_1_review(this stage) for any factual / scope refinement, orstage_2_planif the scope is accepted but the proposed annotation wording must change (e.g., shorter form, different schema clause phrasing, or token-order reversal).[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review verification - IMP-24 K6
Verdict: root cause confirmed; scope-lock confirmed. No code/test/template changes are justified in Stage 1.
Root cause verification:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99A-2 lists the candidate-file column asblock_reference.py,block_selector.py, which reads like a direct A-2 candidate mapping.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023classifies the same A-2 relation as indirect: Phase Qcatalog.yamlloading / block-search patterns are only reference material, and the Phase Q catalog schema differs from the Phase Zframe_contracts+ frame partial schema.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1029-1030confirms the concrete abstraction mismatch:_load_catalog/load_catalogmap to a Phase Zframe_contracts.yamlloader, and_get_block_by_idmaps only loosely to frame contract lookup.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070-1072confirmsSalvage Candidate: noneforblock_reference.py/block_selector.py, with only Reference Only assets for separate future axes.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089records K6 as the factual note: the A-2 mapping is indirect, and direct correction of the section 1 lens is a separate axis.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242confirms A-2 is "new construction" fromframe_contracts + frame_partials catalog, not salvage from those Phase Q modules.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139matches that conclusion: K6 says the audit section 1 A-2 candidate listing is indirect and that A-2 main work isframe_contracts.yaml+frame_partials.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84matches the issue scope: IMP-24 is a low-priority doc-only correction for the audit section 1 lens A-2 column.Code/path verification:
src/block_reference.py:110-124contains_load_catalog/_get_block_by_idagainst Phase Qtemplates/catalog.yaml.src/block_selector.py:22andsrc/block_selector.py:57-78contain the Phase Qtemplates/catalog.yamlpath andload_catalog/_get_block_by_idhelpers.src/phase_z2_mapper.py:34andsrc/phase_z2_mapper.py:49-57show Phase Z loadstemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlthroughload_frame_contracts()/get_contract(template_id).src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2062currently renders Phase Z partials fromfamilies/{template_id}.html;templates/phase_z2/frames/exists but only contains two HTML files. This does not change the IMP-24 root cause because the requested scope is the candidate-file column only, but it is a factual note against over-reading the audit row's output path.Scope-lock:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdonly, A-2 row candidate-file column only.src/block_reference.pyandsrc/block_selector.pyexist, and the Phase Z catalog path exists.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt'rg -n "block_reference|block_selector|A-2|K6|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Salvage|_get_block_by_id|catalog.yaml" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "K6|A-2|block_reference|block_selector|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Phase Q catalog|Phase Z catalog" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdrg --files | rg "block_reference\.py|block_selector\.py|frame_contracts\.yaml|catalog\.yaml|templates/phase_z2/frames|templates\\phase_z2\\frames"rg -n "def _load_catalog|def load_catalog|def _get_block_by_id|catalog\.yaml" src\block_reference.py src\block_selector.pyrg -n "A-2.*Catalog|Salvage 0|frame_contracts \+ frame_partials|새로|frame_partials catalog|A-2 catalog" docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdGet-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\frames' -Filter '*.html' -FileGet-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'templates\phase_z2\families' -Filter '*.html' -FileGet-Contentline-window checks fordocs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md,src\phase_z2_pipeline.py, andsrc\phase_z2_mapper.pyFiles checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdsrc/block_reference.pysrc/block_selector.pysrc/phase_z2_mapper.pysrc/phase_z2_pipeline.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamltemplates/phase_z2/frames/*.htmltemplates/phase_z2/families/*.htmlTest results: Not run; Stage 1 explicitly says grep/find and NO pytest.
Verified facts:
block_reference.py/block_selector.pyas indirect Reference Only, with Salvage Candidate 0.frame_contracts.yaml+ frame partial catalog construction, not direct salvage from the two Phase Q modules.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
📌 [Claude #1] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 — IMP-24 K6
■ Axis enumeration (issue body coverage)
block_reference/block_selector의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials (Phase Q ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.
■ Before / after
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99candidate-file col): bare tokens`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`— shape 가 A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 → §2.10 SoT (line 1023(간접)/ 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 간접 / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)— IMP-22 commit2ace54b가 A-3 에서 lock 한`<file>` (간접 — <reason>)패턴 추종. §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror. A-2 main 후보가 기존 file 아닌 신규 artifact 이므로 본문에 명시 = §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.■ Out of scope
src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84무변경 (Stage 1 exit 확인: 이미 정합).■ Rollback
git revert <commit>— 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert.=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을
(간접 — ...)표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell)files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 2
per-unit rationale:
block_reference.py, block_selector.py뒤에 §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 의(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)표기 append. 실제 line 변경 = 1 (markdown table row 한 줄). atomic 기준 (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족. tests 없음 — doc-only, code/test/template 무변경 (Stage 1 scope_lock).=== EVIDENCE ===
commands_run:
447e702--stat2ace54b-- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdfiles_checked:
(간접 — render-path 자료))(간접)typing)facts:
(간접)+ Salvage 0 으로 type.2ace54b가 A-3 row 에서(간접 — <reason>)surface form lock — reusable precedent.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Requalify PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as indirect reference mapping.
files:
tests:
estimate_lines: 1
per-unit rationale:
Out-of-scope notes:
Rollback strategy:
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
📌 [Claude #2] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 Round #2 — IMP-24 K6
■ Axis enumeration (issue body — full coverage)
block_reference/block_selector의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 markdown cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.
■ Round #1 → Round #2 convergence
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md단일. tests 만 분기 (Claude r1 =[], Codex r1 =pytest -q tests/ 337 passed).pytest -q tests포함 — doc-only edit 이나 RULE 4 (pytest -q tests) sanity gate 로 regression no-op 확인. 추가 비용 < 50 s.2ace54b가 A-3 에서 lock 한`<file>` (간접 — <reason>)패턴 추종 + §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror.■ Before / after
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99candidate-file col): bare tokens`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`— shape 가 A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 → §2.10 SoT (line 1023(간접)/ 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 간접 / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)— IMP-22 surface pattern + §2.10 SoT phrasing mirror. A-2 main 후보가 기존 file 아닌 신규 artifact 임을 cell 안에 명시 → §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.■ Out of scope
src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84무변경 (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1 verified facts 모두 정합 확인).■ Rollback
git revert <commit>— 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert. side effect 없음 (doc-only, code/test/template 무관).=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을
(간접 — ...)표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell). IMP-22 A-3 surface pattern + §2.10 line 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.files:
tests:
estimate_lines: 1
per-unit rationale:
(간접 — ...)표기 append (above "After" surface form). table row 1 줄 = 1 line diff. atomic (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족.pytest -q tests: doc-only no-op sanity gate. Codex r1 baseline 337 passed / 45.36s. regression 가능성 0 단 RULE 4 보호.=== EVIDENCE ===
commands_run:
2ace54b--stat2ace54b-- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (IMP-22 surface pattern 확인)files_checked:
block_reference.py,block_selector.pyconfirmed)(간접 — render-path 자료)IMP-22 pattern)(간접)typing for A-2)간접 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도))verified_facts:
(간접)annotation).2ace54blocked the surface pattern`<file>` (간접 — <reason>)at A-3.(간접)already exists at line 1023 / 1072.source_comment_ids:
commit_sha: (none — Stage 2 produces no commits; doc edit deferred to Stage 3)
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Requalify the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as an indirect reference mapping, consistent with section 2.10 K6 and the Phase Q/Phase Z catalog schema split.
files:
tests:
estimate_lines: 1
per-unit rationale:
block_reference/block_selectorcorrection by changing only the section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell from bare file tokens to an indirect-reference annotation.frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials as the real Phase Z construction target and noting the Phase Q catalog vs Phase Z catalog schema split.Out-of-scope notes:
src/block_reference.pyorsrc/block_selector.py; they are Phase Q reference modules for this issue.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlor frame partials; that is A-2 implementation work outside this doc-only correction.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, orPHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md.Rollback strategy:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortSelect-String -LiteralPath 'docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern '\| \*\*A-2\*\*'rg -n "K6|A-2 main|Salvage Candidate|Reference Only|block_reference.py|block_selector.py|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Phase Q catalog|Phase Z" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdrg -n "load_catalog|_load_catalog|_get_block_by_id" src/block_reference.py src/block_selector.pypytest -q testsFiles checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84src/block_reference.py:110src/block_reference.py:124src/block_selector.py:57src/block_selector.py:78Test results:
pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 40.73sVerified facts:
block_reference.py/block_selector.pycorrection, indirect catalog-loading/block-lookup reference wording, and A-2 main work asframe_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials with a Phase Q/Phase Z schema distinction.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #3] Stage 2: simulation-plan Round #3 — IMP-24 K6
Axis enumeration (issue body — full coverage)
block_reference/block_selector의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 markdown cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.
Round #1 → #2 → #3 convergence
pytest -q testssanity gate 추가 (Codex r1 baseline 337 passed in 45.36s; Codex r2 337 passed in 40.73s). 다른 axis 변동 없음.Before / after (file:line reference only)
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99candidate-file column: bare tokensblock_reference.py,block_selector.py— A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 shape → §2.10 SoT (line 1023(간접)/ 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 간접 / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)표기 append. IMP-22 commit2ace54b의 A-3 lock surface pattern<file>(간접 — ) 추종 + §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror. 본문에 A-2 main artifact (신규 구축) 명시 → §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.Out of scope (Stage 1 exit re-lock)
src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84무변경 (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1/r2 verified facts 모두 정합 확인).Rollback strategy
git revert <commit>— 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert. side effect 없음 (doc-only, code/test/template 무관).=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을
(간접 — ...)표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell). IMP-22 A-3 surface pattern + §2.10 line 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.files:
tests:
estimate_lines: 1
per-unit rationale:
(간접 — ...)표기 append. table row 1 줄 = 1 line diff. atomic (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족.pytest -q tests= doc-only no-op sanity gate. Codex r1/r2 baseline 337 passed 확인됨; regression 신호 없음 보증.=== EVIDENCE ===
commands_run:
files_checked:
(간접 — render-path 자료)surface pattern 보존 확인)verified_facts:
(간접 — render-path 자료)lock 유지 — IMP-22 commit2ace54bboundary 보존.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, 단일 cell, estimate_lines = 1, tests =pytest -q tests. 변동 없음.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Requalify the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as an indirect reference mapping, consistent with section 2.10 K6 and the Phase Q/Phase Z catalog schema split.
files:
tests:
estimate_lines: 1
per-unit rationale:
block_reference/block_selectorcorrection by changing only the section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell from bare file tokens to an indirect-reference annotation.frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials as the real Phase Z construction target and noting the Phase Q catalog vs Phase Z catalog schema split.Out-of-scope notes:
src/block_reference.pyorsrc/block_selector.py; they are Phase Q reference modules for this issue.templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yamlor frame partials; that is A-2 implementation work outside this doc-only correction.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, orPHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md.Rollback strategy:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortSelect-String -LiteralPath 'docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern '\| \*\*A-2\*\*' -Context 0,0rg -n "K6|A-2 main|Salvage Candidate|Reference Only|block_reference.py|block_selector.py|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Phase Q catalog|Phase Z" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdrg -n "load_catalog|_load_catalog|_get_block_by_id" src/block_reference.py src/block_selector.pypytest -q testsFiles checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84src/block_reference.py:110src/block_reference.py:124src/block_selector.py:57src/block_selector.py:78Test results:
pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 40.98sVerified facts:
block_reference.py/block_selector.pyA-2 correction, indirect catalog-loading/block-lookup reference wording, and A-2 main work asframe_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials with a Phase Q/Phase Z schema distinction.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #4] Stage 2: simulation-plan Round #4 — IMP-24 K6
Axis enumeration (issue body — full coverage)
block_reference/block_selector의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 markdown cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.
Round #1 → #2 → #3 → #4 convergence
pytest -q testssanity gate 추가 (Codex r1 baseline 337 passed in 45.36s; Codex r2 337 passed in 40.73s). 다른 axis 변동 없음.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99bare tokens 그대로 존재; IMP-23 commit447e702후에도 A-2 row 무변경). Stage 3 (code-edit) 진입 준비 완료. FINAL_CONSENSUS.Before / after (file:line reference only — code goes in Stage 3)
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99candidate-file column: bare tokensblock_reference.py,block_selector.py— A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 shape → §2.10 SoT (line 1023(간접)/ 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 간접 / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)표기 append. IMP-22 commit2ace54b/ IMP-23 commit447e702의 A-3 / A-4 lock surface pattern<file>(간접 — ) 추종 + §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror. 본문에 A-2 main artifact (신규 구축) 명시 → §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.Out of scope (Stage 1 exit re-lock)
src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84무변경 (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1/r2/r3 verified facts 모두 정합 확인).Rollback strategy
git revert <commit>— 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert. side effect 없음 (doc-only, code/test/template 무관).=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을
(간접 — ...)표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell). IMP-22 / IMP-23 의 A-3 / A-4 surface pattern + §2.10 line 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.files:
tests:
estimate_lines: 1
per-unit rationale:
(간접 — ...)표기 append (above "After" surface form). table row 1 줄 = 1 line diff. atomic (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족.pytest -q tests= doc-only no-op sanity gate. Codex r1/r2/r3 baseline 337 passed 확인됨; regression 신호 없음 보증.=== EVIDENCE ===
commands_run:
files_checked:
(간접 — render-path 자료), IMP-22 lock)verified_facts:
`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`(qualifier 없음).2ace54b) / IMP-23 (447e702) 로(간접 — <reason>)pattern 이미 lock. A-2 surface form = 이 pattern 추종.source_comment_ids:
commit_sha: (none — Stage 2 produces no commits; doc edit deferred to Stage 3)
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #4] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-24 K6
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Requalify the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as an indirect reference mapping, consistent with section 2.10 K6 and the Phase Q/Phase Z catalog schema split.
files:
tests:
estimate_lines: 1
per-unit rationale:
Out-of-scope notes:
Rollback strategy:
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #1] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-24 K6
Executing unit: u1
unit_executed:
u1files_changed:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mddiff_summary:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99— §1 audit lens row A-2 candidate-file column requalified. Bare tokensblock_reference.py,block_selector.pyannotated as indirect references.`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py``block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)(간접)phrasing and IMP-222ace54b/ IMP-23447e702A-3/A-4 lock pattern<file>(간접 — ).git diff --stat docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md→1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).remaining_units: (none — Stage 2 plan defined a single implementation unit
u1)follow_up_issue_candidates:
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml+ frame partials 신규) — 별 이슈, 이미 BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 scope-lock 밖.=== EVIDENCE ===
scope_lock_adherence:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99only (A-2 row candidate-file cell).src/block_reference.py/src/block_selector.py(Phase Q reference modules, out of scope per Stage 1/2).templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml/ frame partials (A-2 main work, separate axis).PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, orPHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md.verified_file_path:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99now reads:| **A-2** | Catalog 확장 (frame_contracts + frame_partials) | ... | ... | ... | \block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) | 높음 |`source_comment_ids:
commit_sha: (none — per stage instructions, no commit / no push in this round; Gitea comment is the deliverable)
[Codex #1] Stage 3 code-edit review IMP-24 K6
Verified unit: u1
Verdict: correct. The executed change is limited to the Section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell in
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, and it requalifiesblock_reference.py/block_selector.pyas indirect references while preserving the A-2 main-work target asframe_contracts.yamlplus frame partials.Scope verification:
git diff --name-onlyreports onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdin the tracked diff.git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdreports1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).Contract verification:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99now annotatesblock_reference.py,block_selector.pyas indirect catalog-loading / block-search-pattern references.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023already types A-2 as indirect and notes the Phase Q catalog vs Phase Z catalog schema split.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070records Salvage Candidate 0.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1072says the Section 1 A-2 mapping is indirect.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089records K6 as the factual note for correcting Section 1 A-2 mapping accuracy.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242says A-2 catalog extension is new construction offrame_contracts + frame_partials catalog.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt'git status --shortgit diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdSelect-String -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern '^\| \*\*A-2\*\* \|'git diff --name-onlygit diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdSelect-String -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern 'A-2.*간접|Salvage Candidate|K6|A-2 =|새로'Files checked:
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdTest results:
Remaining units: none
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #1] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-24 K6
📌 [오케스트레이터] Stage 4: 테스트 및 검증 Round #1
■ 핵심 결정
u1산출 diff 가 Stage 2 plan 과 byte-for-byte 일치 —docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99§1 audit lens A-2 row candidate-file 셀만 수정 (1 file / +1 / −1).`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z), IMP-222ace54b/ IMP-23447e702A-3/A-4 lock pattern(간접 — <reason>)+ §2.10 라인 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.pytest -q tests결과 = 342 passed in 43.50s, 실패 0. Stage 2 baseline 337 대비 +5 는 본 IMP-24 commit 무관 — 직전 push 된 orchestrator commit5d23b74 fix(orchestrator): P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle가 추가한 P5b 검증 테스트에서 유래 (doc-only diff 와 독립).src/block_reference.py/src/block_selector.py/templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml/ frame partials 모두 무변경. 하드코딩 0 (doc-only).■ 검증 표
git diff --stat→docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-(1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-))git diff→@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@, line 99 단일 markdown 셀만 변경block_reference.py, block_selector.py (간접 — ...)가 IMP-23447e702line 100 A-3renderer.py (간접 — render-path 자료)패턴 추종(간접)/A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축/Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z가 §2.10 line 1023(간접)+ 1072 간접 + §3-A line 1242A-2 = 새로 만들기와 정합git diffhunk 1 개, A-2 row 외 변경 0git diff --name-only→PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md1 개, hunk 단일 (line 99)git diff --name-only→ INSIGHT-MAP / BACKLOG 미포함; pre-existing alignment 유지 (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 line 139, BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 line 84)git diff --name-only→src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py미포함git diff --name-only→templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, frame partials 미포함pytest -q tests→ 342 passed in 43.50s, 0 failed; +5 from5d23b74(orchestrator P5b tests), IMP-24 무관■ 회귀 점검 (regression check)
5d23b74commit log 추적 시 P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle 검증 테스트가 신규 추가된 결과. IMP-24 diff 와 독립적, regression 아님.git statusworking tree 에 IMP-24 외 변경 없음 (staged 0, modified =docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdonly).■ 범위 제외 재확인
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml+ frame partials 신규) — 별 axis, BACKLOG §3 잔존.src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py) 코드 수정 — 본 axis 무관.■ 다음 단계
2ace54b/ IMP-23447e702스타일 추종 (docs(#24): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-2 column 정정).=== EVIDENCE ===
git status→modified: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md; 변경 파일 1 개 (다른 modified/staged 없음).git diff --stat docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md→1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).git diff docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md→ 단일 hunk@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@, line 99 A-2 row candidate-file 셀만 수정 (- bare tokens / + bare tokens +(간접 — ...)annotation).| **A-2** | Catalog 확장 (frame_contracts + frame_partials) | ... | block_reference.py, block_selector.py (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) | 높음 |.grep -n "block_reference\|block_selector" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md→ 14 hits; line 99 (수정) 외 lines 129/992/998/999/1001/1010/1019/1027/1030/1039/1044/1045/1053/1057/1058/1068 모두 pre-existing 본문 (unchanged).grep -n "K6\|IMP-24" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md→ INSIGHT-MAP line 139 (K6 wording 보존), BACKLOG line 84 (IMP-24 K6 entry 보존). cross-ref 정합 유지.pytest -q tests→342 passed in 43.50s(베이스라인 337 + orchestrator 신규 5; IMP-24 와 독립).5d23b74 fix(orchestrator): P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle,447e702 docs(#23): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-3/A-4 html_generator 칸 정정,2ace54b docs(#22): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-3/A-4 renderer 칸 정정→ 본 IMP-24 가 같은 시리즈 마무리 axis.[Codex #1] Stage 4 test-verify review IMP-24 K6
Verdict: PASS. The Stage 3 edit matches implementation unit u1 and is commit-ready.
Scope check:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.block_reference.pyandblock_selector.pyas indirect references while preserving A-2 main work asframe_contracts.yamlplus frame partial construction.Regression check:
pytest -q testscompleted with 342 passed and 0 failed.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff --name-onlygit diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdgit diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdSelect-Stringanchor checks ondocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md,docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, anddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdpytest -q testsFiles checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdTest results:
pytest -q tests: 342 passed in 41.15s.Verified facts:
git diff --name-onlyreports onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdas a tracked modified file.git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdreports 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdcontains one hunk at the Section 1 A-2 row and changes only the candidate-file cell.block_reference.pyandblock_selector.pyas indirect references for catalog loading and block lookup/reference patterns.frame_contracts.yamlplus frame partial construction, matching the Phase Q versus Phase Z catalog-schema split.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdSection 2.10 anchors support the correction: the files are reference-only assets, Salvage Candidate is 0, K6 closes the direct Section 1 correction axis, and A-2 is new construction.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139, BACKLOG IMP-24 atdocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84.git status --shortshows many unrelated untracked local artifacts, but they are outside the tracked IMP-24 diff and were not staged.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #1] Stage 5 commit-push — IMP-24 K6
📌 commit_sha:
b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627■ scope-locked diff
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@(§1 audit lens A-2 row candidate-file 셀 단일 수정)■ commit message
(IMP-22
2ace54b/ IMP-23447e702docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...style 추종.)■ push verification
git push slide2 main→5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main(GiteaKyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2).git push origin main→5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main(GitHubkeimin86/design_agent).git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main→b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main→b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.git rev-parse HEADmatches remote tips on both sides.■ scope-lock invariants held
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdstaged via explicit file path (RULE 6, RULE 7).src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py,templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, frame partials 무변경.--no-verify, no force push, no amend.■ 다음 단계
Stage 6 (final-close) — Gitea issue #24 close, INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 row 상태 갱신, A-2 main 구축 follow-up 분리는 별 axis.
=== EVIDENCE ===
git diff --staged --stat→docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-(1 file, +1/-1).git log -n 1 --stat→ commitb1897c0, single-file diff, message body per plan.git push slide2 main→5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main.git push origin main→5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main.git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main→b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main→b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdcarries(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z), mirroring §2.10 line 1023/1072 + §3-A line 1242 binding SoT.pytest -q tests= 342 passed in 43.50s; doc-only diff, no further regression run required for push step.[Codex #1] Stage 5 commit-push verification - IMP-24 K6
Stage 5 verdict: PASS
b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627is localHEAD.slide2/mainandorigin/mainboth resolve tob1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md; the commit stat is 1 file changed, 1 insertion, 1 deletion.block_reference.py/block_selector.py.git show --name-onlyfor the commit lists onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git rev-parse HEADgit status --shortgit log -n 1 --stat --pretty=fullergit show --name-only --pretty=format: b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/maingit ls-remote origin refs/heads/maingit diff b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627^ b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdgit show --stat --oneline b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627Files checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdTest results:
Commit SHA:
b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627Verified facts:
HEADequalsb1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.slide2remoterefs/heads/mainequalsb1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.originremoterefs/heads/mainequalsb1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627contains onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@and changes only the A-2 row candidate-file cell.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #1] Stage 6 final-close — IMP-24 K6
■ 핵심 결정
block_reference.py/block_selector.py간접 reference 재분류) 5-stage exit-report chain 전 단계 PASS. Goal vs result 일치, origin (GitHub) / slide2 (Gitea mirror) 양쪽 모두b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627으로 advance 완료.block_reference/block_selectorA-2 매핑 부정확 정정 → §1 line 99 셀에서 bare token 뒤(간접 — ...)annotation append.frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials 신규 구축 (Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) 명시 → §3-A line 1242 binding SoT 와 정합.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md단일 파일, +1/-1, single hunk), §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B verbatim 보존, IMP-22 (2ace54b) / IMP-23 (447e702) A-3/A-4(간접 — <reason>)lock 패턴 추종.(간접)SoT 와 일치 → no edit. IMP-21 (5590ef2) / IMP-22 (2ace54b) / IMP-23 (447e702) precedent symmetry: 동일 commit message convention (docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...), 동일 label retention (needs-codex-review), 세 선례 모두 close 완료.■ 범위 제외 (follow-up axes, 별 axis defer)
templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml+ frame_partials 신규 작성 (V4 32 후보 backend 적용 가능 frame 수 3 → 32) — Stage 1 scope_lock 외, BACKLOG §3 A-2 main 별 IMP 로 잔존.src/block_reference.py,src/block_selector.py) — Phase Q 모듈 archive, IMP-24 boundary 외.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdK6 row (line 139) — 이미 정합, 정리 불요.pending → done/closed갱신 — 별 turn axis (Stage 6 commit 무생성 원칙)..orchestrator/,tests/matching/*,samples/uploads/, etc.) — governance / run state, commit 범위 외 유지.■ 다음 단계
needs-codex-review유지).=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===
[Codex #1] Stage 6 final-close review IMP-24 K6
Verdict: PASS. I independently verified the Stage 5 commit, remote state, single-file scope, and the named cross-reference anchors. The implementation matches the issue scope: the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell now classifies
block_reference.pyandblock_selector.pyas indirect references, and keeps A-2 main construction onframe_contracts.yamlplus frame partials.Scope-qualified findings:
b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627is localHEADand bothslide2/mainandorigin/mainpoint to the same SHA.D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, with one hunk and1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).frame_contracts.yaml+frame_partialsnew construction with a Phase Q vs Phase Z catalog schema split.PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdsection 2.10 has A-2 as indirect, Salvage Candidate 0, K6 as the factual note, and section 3-A says A-2 is new construction.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdK6 already matches this interpretation.PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdstill has IMP-24 markedpending; I treat that as non-blocking for this final-close verification because the binding Stage 5/6 reports explicitly defer backlog status updates to a separate follow-up axis, outside the single commit scope.Decision: close OK. No rewind target is required.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git rev-parse HEADgit status --shortgit log -n 1 --pretty=fuller --statgit show --name-only --pretty=format:%H%n%s b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627git diff --stat b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627^ b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdgit diff b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627^ b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdgit ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/maingit ls-remote origin refs/heads/mainrg -n "A-2|block_reference|block_selector|Salvage Candidate|K6|frame_contracts|frame_partials|IMP-24" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdrg -n "K6|block_reference|block_selector|IMP-24|A-2" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdrg -n "IMP-24|A-2|block_reference|block_selector" docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdgit diff --name-only HEADFiles checked:
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdTest results:
pytest -q testsas342 passed.Verified facts:
HEAD=b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.slide2/main=b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.origin/main=b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627changes onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).git diff --name-only HEADis empty, so there are no tracked unstaged changes after the commit; untracked local artifacts remain outside commit scope.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdmatches the indirect-reference interpretation.pending; this is recorded as a deferred status-update axis, not a scope failure for the doc-only correction.Commit SHA:
b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES