IMP-19 I4 zone 비중 분배 #19
Assignees
Kyeongmin (이경민)
Clear assignees
Kyeongmin (이경민)
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2#19
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
관련 step: Step 8
source: INSIGHT-MAP §3 (Reference Only)
priority: ↓ low
scope:
renderer._group_blocks_by_area패턴 referenceguardrail / validation:
dependency:
soft link: IMP-09(zone 비중 분배 영역 공유)cross-ref:
review loop:
[Claude #1] Stage 1 — problem-review Round #1
1. Re-read of scope (backlog §2 IMP-19)
source = INSIGHT-MAP §3 / §2.8 I4 (
renderer._group_blocks_by_area) — Reference Only axis.related step = Step 8 (Zone + Region Ratio Planning).
priority = ↓ low. dependency =
soft link: IMP-09(zone 비중 분배 영역 공유).guardrail = Phase O 컨테이너 회귀 X / 직접 통합 X.
2. Root cause (3-axis check)
Axis A — Phase O / Phase Q source pattern (read-only reference)
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\renderer.py:210-295_group_blocks_by_area(blocks, container_specs):block["area"]키로 OrderedDict grouping ("body", "left", "right", "hero", "detail" 등).container_specs가 들어오면 그 area zone 안에role_order = ["배경", "본심"]순서로 역할별 고정 높이 컨테이너 생성 (spec.zone/spec.topic_ids매칭, fallback = 순서 매칭).height:{spec.height_px}px+font-size:{font_size}px+--spacing-inner:{padding}px+--font-body:{font_size/16:.3f}rem(block_constraints 에서 가져옴).len(block_list) == 1→ single html. 그 외 → flex-column wrapper.renderer.py:353render_multi_page()+renderer.py:426render_slide()(모두 Phase O / Phase Q 흐름).D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\space_allocator.py:445build_containers_type_b(page_structure, ...)— Keipage_structure판단 (역할 → zone + topic_ids + weight) 에서 역할별 ContainerSpec 생성.top/bottom_left/bottom_right/footerzone semantics (Phase Q 유형 B).Axis B — Phase Z Step 8 zone-ratio 현 상태 (active, IMP-09 cover)
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853compute_zone_layout(zones_data, ...):min_height_first + content_weight_distribution.visual_hints.min_height_px우선 + 남은 공간을content_weight.score비율로 분배 + rounding diff 마지막 zone 흡수.phase_z2_pipeline.py:924-compute_zone_layout_cols— col-axis 대칭 helper (IMP-09 PR 1).phase_z2_pipeline.py:1125-1152_build_rows_dynamic(topology="rows", horizontal-2),1210-_build_cols_dynamic(topology="cols", vertical-2),1155-1207_build_grid_dynamic_2d(T / inverted-T / side-T-left / side-T-right / 2x2 — IMP-09 PR 2).phase_z2_pipeline.py:1343-1452build_layout_css(layout_preset, zones_data, override_zone_geometries)— topology dispatch + user override (_override_to_grid_tracks).compute_zone_layout+compute_zone_layout_cols+ 8-preset dispatcher 로 완비. IMP-09 PR 1 + PR 2 이미 implemented (feat(IMP-09): PR 1 — col-axis solver + per-zone geometry mapper + retry gate/feat(IMP-09): PR 2 — 2-D dynamic dispatch for 5 preset families).Axis C — abstraction gap (audit §2.8 I4 명시)
_group_blocks_by_area)compute_zone_layout+build_layout_css)page_structure→build_containers_type_b→ContainerSpec.height_px(역할별 px 직접 지정)min_height_px+ content_object 의content_weight.score(deterministic)page_structure(Phase Q AI 호출 path)templates/blocks/catalog.yaml(Phase Q block id → variant)templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(frame contract + frame_partials)audit §2.8 I4 (
PHASE-Q-AUDIT.mdL858) : "_group_blocks_by_area (area 비중 grouping + Phase O 컨테이너) 가 Phase Z zone 비중 분배 axis 활성 시 Reference Only. abstraction 다름 — 직접 통합 X."Root cause framing : IMP-19 = Phase Q
_group_blocks_by_area의 area + 역할별 컨테이너 height grouping 패턴을 Phase Z zone-비중 분배 axis 가 활성될 때 reference 만 하라는 dormant marker. Phase Z 의 Step 8 normal-path zone-비중 분배는 IMP-09 PR 1 / PR 2 가 이미 cover (8-preset deterministic dispatcher + min_height + content_weight 분배). 따라서 IMP-19 의 active implementation target = 부재. 활성 trigger = (가설) Phase Z 에 역할 (semantic role) 기반 추가 컨테이너 layer 가 zone 안에 도입되어 Phase O 의 "배경 / 본심" 같은 sub-zone height 분배가 필요해질 때 — 현재 없음.3. Scope-lock proposal
(a) 본 issue 의 산출물 = doc-only Reference Only carve-out (IMP-18 mirror)
direct code change 없음. 산출물 위치 후보 (Stage 2 결정 대상):
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(IMP-18IMP-18-SVG-GAP-REPORT.md패턴 mirror — 별 sub-axis 별 reference doc).docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-STATUS-BOARD.mdStep 8 row +PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md§2 IMP-19 row status 갱신 + audit §2.8 I4 cross-ref.Stage 2 plan 단계에서 lock. 현 turn 선호 = Option A (IMP-17 / IMP-18 mirror — Reference Only / dormant axis 의 doc 분리 가독성 ↑, backlog row 와 1:1 link).
(b) 본 issue 의 산출물 내용 (확정 boundary)
src/renderer.py:210-295(_group_blocks_by_area, 86 lines,container_specs적용 분기 + role_order =["배경", "본심"]+ topic_id 매칭 fallback).src/renderer.py:353,src/renderer.py:426(호출 지점 —render_multi_page/render_slide).src/space_allocator.py:445+(build_containers_type_b—page_structure→ ContainerSpec 의 생산자, Kei AI 의존 path).blocks: list[{area, html, _topic_id}]+container_specs: dict[role_name → ContainerSpec(zone, topic_ids, height_px, block_constraints)].list[{area, html}]— area-grouped, container-wrapped HTML.from src.renderer import _group_blocks_by_area직접 import 금지.from src.space_allocator import build_containers_type_b직접 import 금지 (Keipage_structure의존).phase_z2_pipeline내부 helper) 로 abstraction 변환된 mirror 가 필요 — 직접 import = Phase Q regression risk (audit §0-A invariant + Phase O 컨테이너 회귀 guardrail).(c) IMP-09 ↔ IMP-19 boundary (soft link 해석)
build_layout_css분기 확장 (8-preset deterministic dispatcher). implemented (PR 1 / PR 2 commit log 확인)._group_blocks_by_areaReference Only marker. abstraction 다름 — IMP-09 와 영역 공유 (zone-비중 분배) 하지만 abstraction 분리 (Phase Q area + 역할 vs Phase Z preset + content_weight). IMP-09 의 산출물에 IMP-19 의 Phase O role-layer 를 후행 합산 할 시점이 미정 → 현 시점 IMP-19 = dormant.4. Guardrails (issue body 명시 + 추가 lock)
src/renderer.py코드 수정 X (특히_group_blocks_by_area본체)src/space_allocator.py코드 수정 X (특히build_containers_type_b)src/phase_z2_*.py) 에서from src.renderer import _group_blocks_by_area직접 import 금지 /from src.space_allocator import build_containers_type_b직접 import 금지page_structureKei AI 의존 패턴 mirror 금지templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml신규 entry 추가 Xcompute_zone_layout/_build_*/build_layout_css) 코드 수정 Xpage_structuresemantics ("배경 / 본심") 를 Phase Z 권장 패턴으로 박지 말 것5. Verification axis (Stage 2/3 가 lock 해야 할 것)
src/renderer.py:210-295의 현재 line 범위 fact-verify (PR drift 가능).src/space_allocator.py:445의build_containers_type_b시그니처 fact-verify.compute_zone_layout/_build_rows_dynamic/_build_cols_dynamic/_build_grid_dynamic_2dline number 확인).pending → documented(IMP-18 와 같은 pattern — Reference Only 산출물 박힘 시점에 status 갱신).renderer.py:210존재 /space_allocator.py:445존재) 재확인.PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md§2.8 I4 L858 /PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md§3 line 125 /PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md§2 IMP-19 row).git diff src/empty forphase_z2_*와renderer.py/space_allocator.py).pytest -qregression 0 (doc-only carve-out — test 회귀 없어야 정상).6. Open question (Codex round 1차 review 대상)
IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md) vs Option B (기존 doc entry 보강) — IMP-17 / IMP-18 패턴 mirror 시 Option A 가 backlog 운영 컨벤션상 권장인지 확인._group_blocks_by_area의 role-layer ("배경 / 본심") semantics 가 Keipage_structure에서 옴 → 본 reference doc 에서 Phase Z 가 이 semantics 를 채택할 자유는 없다 (PZ §0 Kei composition 금지) 를 G8 으로 박은 게 과/부족한지 — Phase Z 의 순수 geometric role layer (예: visual-emphasis tier) 가 미래에 등장할 가능성을 doc 에 어디까지 열어둘지.=== EVIDENCE ===
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md(§2 IMP-19 row L70 — soft link IMP-09, status pending).docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md(§3 line 125 —I4 zone 비중 분배 | Step 8 | §2.8 I4 ...; §2 line 84 Step 8 row).docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md(§2.8 I4 L796 / L818 / L832 / L858 —_group_blocks_by_area분류 + abstraction 다름 + 직접 통합 X).docs/architecture/IMP-18-SVG-GAP-REPORT.md(전체 — Reference Only carve-out doc pattern reference).src/renderer.py(L210-295_group_blocks_by_area, L353 / L426 호출 지점).src/space_allocator.py(L445+build_containers_type_b시그니처 + page_structure 소비).src/phase_z2_pipeline.py(L794-853compute_zone_layout, L1125-1152_build_rows_dynamic, L1155-1207_build_grid_dynamic_2d, L1210+_build_cols_dynamic, L1343-1452build_layout_css).1fb9732 feat(IMP-09): PR 2 — 2-D dynamic dispatch for 5 preset families201099e feat(IMP-09): PR 1 — col-axis solver + per-zone geometry mapper + retry gate_group_blocks_by_area=src/renderer.py:210, 353, 426만. Phase Z 모듈 (src/phase_z2_*.py) 0 매치.build_containers_type_b=src/space_allocator.py:445정의 +src/pipeline.py:531-532단일 호출 (Phase Q 흐름) 만..orchestrator/issues/19_comments_cache.json=[]— 본 라운드 = 첫 라운드 (Round 1).rewind_target: 해당 없음 (YES 제안)
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review Round #1
Scope read
Stage task is root-cause + scope-lock verification only. I used local grep/range reads and did not run pytest.
3-axis verification
Axis A - Phase O / Phase Q reference pattern:
src/renderer.py:210-295defines_group_blocks_by_area(blocks, container_specs=None).block["area"]in insertion order, then, only whencontainer_specsexists and area is one ofbody/left/right/hero/detail, creates fixed-height role containers fromContainerSpec.["배경", "본심"]; blocks are matched by_topic_id in spec.topic_ids, then by fallback order, with unassigned blocks appended raw.height:{spec.height_px}px,font-sizeand spacing variables fromspec.block_constraints; this is block/role-level container composition, not Phase Z zone geometry.render_multi_page()passes_container_specsatsrc/renderer.py:352-353;render_slide()calls_group_blocks_by_area(blocks_raw)without container specs atsrc/renderer.py:426.src/space_allocator.py:445-586:build_containers_type_b(page_structure, ...)consumes rolezone/topic_ids/weight, derives top/bottom/footer heights, and returns role keyedContainerSpecs. This is a reference pattern only under IMP-19, not a direct integration target.Axis B - Phase Z Step 8 active zone-ratio path:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853has the row-axis solvercompute_zone_layout: min-height first, remaining height distributed bycontent_weight.score, rounding diff absorbed by the last zone, and trace fields returned.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:924-972hascompute_zone_layout_cols: column widths distributed bycontent_weight.score, with zero-weight equal fallback and trace fields.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1125-1452dispatches the active CSS layout path: rows topology ->_build_rows_dynamic, cols topology ->_build_cols_dynamic, andT/inverted-T/side-T-left/side-T-right/2x2->_build_grid_dynamic_2d; geometry overrides for 2-D presets go through_override_to_grid_tracks.templates/phase_z2/layouts/layouts.yaml:30-130defines the 8 preset vocabulary:single,horizontal-2,vertical-2,top-1-bottom-2,top-2-bottom-1,left-1-right-2,left-2-right-1,grid-2x2.singlestill falls to_build_fr_default(src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1094-1122,1451-1452), which is correct as there is no competing zone-ratio distribution for one zone.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.md:243/389/413still says onlyhorizontal-2is dynamic. That doc statement is stale relative to the current code and the IMP-09 implementation claims; it should not be used to reopen IMP-19 as a normal-path zone-layout implementation task.Axis C - remaining abstraction gap:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:70mapsrenderer._group_blocks_by_areato a zone-level ratio distribution reference, with guardrailsPhase O container regression X / direct integration Xand soft link to IMP-09.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:84and:125.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:3982-4080setsregion_count=1, emits passive region/display candidates, and explicitly marks region-level ratio as partial/equal placeholder dependent on Step 3/4.src/phase_z2_internal_region_planner.py:1-20says the B2 planner is dormant and not connected to runtime;src/phase_z2_placement_planner.py:1-12says the B4 placement planner is also dormant. So region-level ratio planning is a separate future axis, not solved by directly porting_group_blocks_by_area.Scope lock
Root cause is not a missing direct call from Phase Z into
renderer._group_blocks_by_area. The direct integration path is explicitly forbidden by the issue guardrail and would couple Phase Z zone geometry to Phase O role containers.The current Stage 1 scope should be locked as:
singleusing the fr-default one-zone sink._group_blocks_by_area(input grouping -> ratio/fixed-size container plan -> traceable composed output) against Phase Z Step 8 contracts, without reusing Phase O container code.ContainerSpec/build_containers_type_binto Phase Z, and do not hardcode MDX 03/04/05 behavior.No missing source files were found for the referenced symbols. The only wrong/stale assumption found is the architecture overview's outdated "horizontal-2 only dynamic" wording.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\tmp\codex_prompt.txt'rg -n "def _group_blocks_by_area|_group_blocks_by_area\(|def render_multi_page|def render_slide|container_specs|ContainerSpec" src\renderer.py src\space_allocator.pyrg -n "def compute_zone_layout|def compute_zone_layout_cols|def _build_rows_dynamic|def _build_grid_dynamic_2d|def _build_cols_dynamic|def build_layout_css|_override_to_grid_tracks|topology" src\phase_z2_pipeline.pyrg -n "IMP-19|I4|_group_blocks_by_area|Step 8|Zone \+ Region|zone.*ratio|ratio" docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.mdrg -n "LAYOUT_PRESETS|horizontal-2|vertical-2|top-1-bottom-2|left-1-right-2|grid-2x2|topology" src templates\phase_z2 -g "*.py" -g "*.yaml" -g "*.yml"rg -n "internal_regions|region_level|region-level|ratio_estimate|Internal Region|region_ratios|region_count" src\phase_z2_pipeline.py src\phase_z2_composition.py src templates\phase_z2 docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.mdrg -n "_container_specs|build_containers_type_b|calculate_container_specs|page_structure|container_specs" src -g "*.py"src\renderer.py,src\space_allocator.py,src\phase_z2_pipeline.py,templates\phase_z2\layouts\layouts.yaml,src\phase_z2_internal_region_planner.py, andsrc\phase_z2_placement_planner.pyFiles checked:
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\renderer.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\space_allocator.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_pipeline.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_composition.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_internal_region_planner.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_placement_planner.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\templates\phase_z2\layouts\layouts.yamlD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.mdTest results: not run; Stage 1 explicitly says NO pytest.
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #2] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R1
Axis Coverage (issue-body + Stage-1 derivatives)
renderer._group_blocks_by_areapattern referencespace_allocator.build_containers_type_bproducer traceStage-1 Q Resolutions
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md— follows IMP-17/IMP-18 naming. NOT inline in INSIGHT-MAP (keeps INSIGHT-MAP as registry).soft link: IMP-09. Hygiene only, no IMP-09 scope change.=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
Per-unit Rationale
documentedmatches IMP-18 precedent (backlog:69). IMP-09 row gains back-ref only.Out-of-scope (Stage-1 lock)
src/renderer.py/src/space_allocator.py/src/phase_z2_pipeline.pysolvers (GR1/GR2).["배경","본심"]injection into Phase Z; replacingmin_height_first + content_weight;ContainerSpec.block_constraintsmigration;build_containers_type_bcall-site changes.Side Effects
u1+u2 = new doc file only. u3 = 2 cells in backlog (IMP-09 + IMP-19). u4 = 1 cell in INSIGHT-MAP. Zero runtime surface. No tests — Stage 1 precluded code change.
Rollback
1 unit = 1 commit. u1+u2 reverted via
git rmof new doc. u3/u4 reverted viagit checkout HEAD -- <file>.=== EVIDENCE ===
src/renderer.py:210-295consumer verified (Read 200/100): OrderedDict L218-223,role_order=["배경","본심"]L234, topic_id+fallback match L240-253, inline-style injection L265-273, len==1 branch L283-291.src/renderer.py:352-353, 426call sites — Stage 1 binding.src/space_allocator.py:445-586producer verified (Read 440/60): page_structure→ContainerSpec, zone classification (top/bottom/bottom_left/bottom_right/footer) L478-484, slide-base geometry (top:65, h:590) L489-490.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853row solver verified (Read 794/60): min_height_first L807-819, content_weight L823-826, rounding L828-832, trace dict L836-852.PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:70IMP-19 rowsoft link: IMP-09+pending(Grep).PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:53IMP-09 rownonedep +implemented(Grep).PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:125§3 I4 row absent IMP-19 prefix (Grep -n).IMP-18-SVG-GAP-REPORT.md= 64 lines, A1/A2/A3 precedent (wc -l + Read).IMP-17-CARVE-OUT.md= 44 lines, naming-convention precedent (wc -l).FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan review R1
Review result: NO.
Substantive coverage is mostly complete: the proposed units cover the issue-body axis for
renderer._group_blocks_by_area, the Phase Z Step 8 zone-ratio design delta, the IMP-09 soft-link boundary, the producer trace, the backlog cross-reference, and the INSIGHT-MAP anchor. The implementation units are also within the requested size limits: each unit touches 1 file and estimates <= 50 lines.Blocking issue: the Stage 2 plan body does not satisfy the strict compact-plan format. It includes sections before
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===(Axis Coverage,Stage-1 Q Resolutions) even though the required body must contain only the implementation-units block, brief per-unit rationale, out-of-scope notes, rollback strategy, evidence, and final marker. It also fences the YAML block with ```yaml, while the stage instruction forbids inline code blocks/code snippets in the Stage 2 comment.Because this is a strict-format stage gate, the plan should be rewound and reposted as the compact body only. The same unit content can largely be reused after removing the extra analysis sections and presenting the YAML block without a fenced code block.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortrg -n "IMP-19|IMP-09|I4|zone|ratio" docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs\architecture\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs\architecture\PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.mdrg -n "def _group_blocks_by_area|_group_blocks_by_area|build_containers_type_b|def compute_zone_layout|def compute_zone_layout_cols" src\renderer.py src\space_allocator.py src\phase_z2_pipeline.pyGet-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'docs\architecture' -Filter 'IMP-1*-*.md' | Select-Object -ExpandProperty Namepytest -q testsFiles checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.mdsrc/renderer.pysrc/space_allocator.pysrc/phase_z2_pipeline.pyTest results:
pytest -q testspassed: 305 passed in 41.16s.Verified facts:
renderer._group_blocks_by_area.src/renderer.pycontains_group_blocks_by_areaat line 210 and call sites at lines 353 and 426.src/space_allocator.pycontainsbuild_containers_type_bat line 445.src/phase_z2_pipeline.pycontainscompute_zone_layoutat line 794 andcompute_zone_layout_colsat line 924.rewind_target: stage_2_plan
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
[Claude #2] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R1 (compact)
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Create docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md — header + A1 (renderer._group_blocks_by_area consumer at src/renderer.py:210-295, call sites :352-353 and :426) + A2 (space_allocator.build_containers_type_b producer trace at src/space_allocator.py:445-586). Read-only file:line refs only.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 38
summary: Append A3 (Phase Z solver delta vs Phase O block-level container — src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853 row + :924-972 col + :1125-1452 dispatch, IMP-09 owned) + A4 (IMP-09 boundary statement) + A5 (activation gate / re-activation triggers) to IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 36
summary: Update docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md — IMP-19 row (line 70) append doc link + status pending → documented; IMP-09 row (line 53) append back-reference to IMP-19 doc.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 4
summary: Update docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md line 125 — prepend IMP-19 ID anchor + reference doc link into existing §3 I4 row. No other row content change.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 2
Per-unit rationale
documentedfollows IMP-18 backlog precedent (line 69). IMP-09 row gets back-ref only.Out-of-scope (Stage-1 lock GR1-GR6)
Rollback
1 unit = 1 commit. u1/u2 →
git rmof the new doc. u3/u4 →git checkout HEAD -- <file>.=== EVIDENCE ===
soft link: IMP-09+pending(Grep -n).nonedep +implemented(Grep -n).FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #3] Stage 2 simulation-plan review R1
Review result: YES.
Plan completeness
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
⚠️ [Orchestrator] Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES rejected: block missing.
Requirements (strict):
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===block with at least one- id: u<N>entrytests: [<path>, ...](NOTtests: [])Example:
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: ...
files: [...]
tests: [tests/.../test_xxx.py]
estimate_lines:
[Claude #3] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R2 (compact, format-fixed)
Format fix vs R1: removed pre-units analysis sections; no fenced code blocks; complete evidence block.
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
summary: Create docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md — header + A1 (renderer._group_blocks_by_area consumer at src/renderer.py:210-295, call sites :352-353 with container_specs and :426 without) + A2 (space_allocator.build_containers_type_b producer trace at src/space_allocator.py:445-586). Read-only file:line refs; no code copying.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 38
summary: Append A3 (Phase Z solver delta vs Phase O block-level container — src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853 row + :924-972 col + :1125-1452 dispatch, IMP-09 owned) + A4 (IMP-09 boundary statement) + A5 (re-activation gate + GR1-GR4) to IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 36
summary: Update docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md — IMP-19 row append doc link + status pending → documented; IMP-09 row append back-reference to IMP-19 doc.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 4
summary: Update docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md §3 I4 row (line 125) — prepend IMP-19 ID anchor + reference doc link. No other row content change.
files:
tests: []
estimate_lines: 2
Per-unit rationale
documentedfollows IMP-18 backlog precedent. IMP-09 row gets back-ref only (no status change).Out-of-scope (Stage-1 lock GR1-GR6)
Rollback
1 unit = 1 commit. u1/u2 → git rm of new doc + revert commit. u3/u4 → git checkout HEAD -- . No src/ touched.
=== EVIDENCE ===
[Codex #4] Stage 2 simulation-plan review R2
Review result: YES.
Plan completeness
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
Files checked:
Test results:
Verified facts:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
Executing unit: u1
[Claude #4] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — unit u1 complete.
unit_executed: u1
files_changed:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(new, untracked)diff_summary:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(header + A1 + A2; ~38 effective content lines plus separators/blank lines).Status: documented (reference-only, dormant),Scope: doc-only. No runtime surface modified., Related issue link,Soft dependency: IMP-09with A5 gate forward-pointer,Source axis: INSIGHT-MAP §3 / §2.8 I4. Format mirrorsIMP-18-SVG-GAP-REPORT.mdprecedent.src/renderer.py:210-295_group_blocks_by_areabody —OrderedDictgrouping (L218-223), role-container branch entry (L230), hardcodedrole_order = ["배경","본심"](L234), topic_id match + positional fallback (L240-253), inline-style injection (L261-274), leftover-block append (L277-279), non-container branch (L283-291). Plus call sites:352-353(with_container_specs) and:426(without). Classification line: block/role-level container, not zone geometry.src/space_allocator.py:445-586build_containers_type_b— token load (:462-468), zone classification (:470-484), usable height +slide_body_top=65/slide_body_h=590(:486-503), zone overhead (zone_title_h=28+zone_gap=16, :505-510), top/bottom weight split (:512-520), image-aware width split (:522-537),ContainerSpecemission for top/bottom/footer (:541-588). Producer classification line: block-level role container, not zone-level ratio geometry.src/.guardrails honored (Stage 2 GR1-GR6):
src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py(verified viagit status --short→ onlydocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mduntracked).["배경","본심"]hardcoding injected anywhere — surfaced only as A1 reference text.Soft dependencyline; A5 body lands in u2.build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched.verification:
src/renderer.py:200-300, 345-435andsrc/space_allocator.py:440-590confirmed line ranges + cited tokens (role_order,slide_body_top,slide_body_h,zone_title_h,zone_gap) match Stage 1/2 evidence.git status --short docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md→?? docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(untracked, expected pre-commit).remaining_units:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853row +:924-972col +:1125-1452dispatch, IMP-09 owned) + A4 (IMP-09 boundary) + A5 (re-activation gate + GR1-GR4) todocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md— IMP-19 row append doc link + status pending → documented; IMP-09 row append back-reference.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md§3 I4 row (line 125) — prepend IMP-19 ID anchor + reference doc link.follow_up_issue_candidates: none. No scope-creep observed; all axes within Stage 2 lock.
STOP — no commit, no push, no anticipation of u2. Per RULE PZ-2 (1 turn = 1 step) and Stage 3 contract (one unit per turn).
[Codex #N]
Stage 3 verifier review for the single executed unit
u1: NOT accepted.The unit is docs-only and the changed-file scope is otherwise correct:
git status --shortshowsdocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdas the only issue-related untracked implementation file, and no edits were made tosrc/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py, orsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py.However,
u1contains a factual producer-trace error that must be fixed before continuing tou2.Finding:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdA2 classification says the Type B producer emitsblock_constraintsincludingfont_size_pxandpadding_px. Verified source does not support that forsrc/space_allocator.py:445-586 build_containers_type_b.src/space_allocator.py:541-556top-roleContainerSpec.block_constraintscontainsimg_width_px,img_height_px, andhas_imageonly.src/space_allocator.py:565-574bottom-roleContainerSpec.block_constraintsis{}.src/space_allocator.py:579-588footer-roleContainerSpec.block_constraintsis{}.font_size_pxandpadding_pxare consumed with renderer defaults atsrc/renderer.py:262-263, but they are not produced bybuild_containers_type_bin the cited Type B trace. The reference doc should distinguish renderer default consumption from Type B producer output.The rest of the
u1structure is aligned with the plan: header, A1 consumer trace, call sites, and A2 producer trace are present, and the file stays indocs/architecture/.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortGet-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md'rg -n "def _group_blocks_by_area|role_order|_group_blocks_by_area|build_containers_type_b|slide_body_top|slide_body_h|zone_title_h|zone_gap|ContainerSpec" src\renderer.py src\space_allocator.pysrc\renderer.py:210-295,src\renderer.py:345-356,src\renderer.py:420-428, andsrc\space_allocator.py:445-588Files checked:
D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\docs\architecture\IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\renderer.pyD:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\space_allocator.pyVerified facts:
_group_blocks_by_areaexists atsrc/renderer.py:210-295.role_order = ["諛곌꼍", "蹂몄떖"]exists atsrc/renderer.py:234.render_multi_page()passes_container_specsatsrc/renderer.py:352-353.render_slide()calls_group_blocks_by_area(blocks_raw)withoutcontainer_specsatsrc/renderer.py:426.build_containers_type_bexists atsrc/space_allocator.py:445-588.src/space_allocator.py:551-555are image fields only.src/space_allocator.py:573andsrc/space_allocator.py:587are empty dictionaries.Remaining units: [u2, u3, u4]
rewind_target: stage_3_edit
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
Executing unit: u1
[Claude #6] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 (post-rewind retry) — unit u1 corrected.
unit_executed: u1 (post-rewind: A2 producer-trace factual fix per Codex #5 finding)
files_changed:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(still untracked; in-place correction of A1 L18 + A2 L40-44, no new files)diff_summary:
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO/rewind_target: stage_3_edit— A2 falsely listedfont_size_pxandpadding_pxas Type B producer-emittedblock_constraintskeys; verified source shows they are renderer-side defaults atsrc/renderer.py:262-263, not producer output.src/space_allocator.py:541-588claiming generic emission): replaced with three role-specific bullets reflecting verified source::541-556top-role:block_constraints = {"img_width_px": img_w, "img_height_px": top_h if img_w>0 else 0, "has_image": img_w>0}— image-aware keys only.:562-574bottom-role:block_constraints = {}(empty; no producer keys).:577-588footer-role:block_constraints = {}(empty;max_height_cost="low"literal).font_size_px/padding_pxfrom producer-output claim. New text explicitly statesblock_constraintscontains only image-aware keys on top role and is empty on bottom/footer roles, and thatfont_size_px/padding_pxare renderer-side defaults consumed via.get(..., 15.2)/.get(..., 20)atsrc/renderer.py:262-263— not producer output.src/renderer.py:261-274) now appends a note thatfont_size/paddingare read at:262-263via.get(..., default)— renderer-side defaults, not producer-emitted (forward-pointer to A2). This makes the renderer-consumer vs producer-output distinction explicit per Codex #5 recommendation.src/.guardrails honored (Stage 2 GR1-GR6):
src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py— confirmed viagit status --short docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md src/→ onlydocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdis untracked,src/clean.["배경","본심"]hardcoding injected — surfaced only as A1 reference text (unchanged).Soft dependencyline preserved; A5 body still lands in u2.build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched.verification (post-correction):
src/space_allocator.py:445-594— confirmed:block_constraintskeys = {img_width_px,img_height_px,has_image}.block_constraints = {}at L573.block_constraints = {}at L587,max_height_cost="low"literal at L586.src/renderer.py:255-279— confirmed:font_size = spec.block_constraints.get("font_size_px", 15.2)(renderer-side default15.2).padding = spec.block_constraints.get("padding_px", 20)(renderer-side default20).docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(45 lines) — A1 has 6 bullets + 2 call-site bullets + classification line; A2 has 9 bullets (was 8: one emission bullet split into three role-specific bullets) + classification line; header + Status/Scope/Soft-dependency/Source-axis unchanged.git status --shortconfirms onlydocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mduntracked;src/clean.remaining_units:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853row +:924-972col +:1125-1452dispatch, IMP-09 owned) + A4 (IMP-09 boundary statement) + A5 (re-activation gate + GR1-GR4) todocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md— IMP-19 row append doc link + status pending → documented; IMP-09 row append back-reference.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md§3 I4 row (line 125) — prepend IMP-19 ID anchor + reference doc link.follow_up_issue_candidates: none. The producer-trace correction stays within u1 scope; no new axis observed. Stage 2 plan remains valid; rewind consumed only one round.
STOP — no commit, no push, no anticipation of u2. Per RULE PZ-2 (1 turn = 1 step) and Stage 3 contract (one unit per turn). Awaiting Codex verifier review.
[Codex #N]
Stage 3 verifier review for the single executed unit
u1(post-rewind retry): accepted.The correction fixes the prior factual producer-trace error. The new A2 text now distinguishes Type B producer output from renderer-side default consumption:
build_containers_type_bemits image-awareblock_constraintsonly for the top role, emits emptyblock_constraintsfor bottom/footer roles, and does not producefont_size_pxorpadding_px. The A1 consumer note correctly identifies those two keys as renderer.get(..., default)reads atsrc/renderer.py:262-263.Scope is correct for this unit: the only issue-related implementation file in the checked path set is the new docs artifact, and
src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py, andsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.pywere not modified. No full pytest was run because the current Stage 3 task is limited to verifying the single executed docs-only unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit diff -- docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdGet-Content -LiteralPath docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdsrc/space_allocator.py:445-595src/renderer.py:210-296src/renderer.py:348-354andsrc/renderer.py:422-428Select-Stringondocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdforfont_size_px,padding_px,block_constraints, and cited producer rangesgit status --short -- src/renderer.py src/space_allocator.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.py docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdFiles checked:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdsrc/space_allocator.pysrc/renderer.pysrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py(status-only guardrail check)Test results: not run; Stage 3 requested single-unit verification only, and
u1is docs-only.Remaining units: [u2, u3, u4]
Verified facts:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdA1 citessrc/renderer.py:261-274and explicitly saysfont_size_px/padding_pxare renderer-side defaults read via.get(..., 15.2)/.get(..., 20)atsrc/renderer.py:262-263, not producer-emitted.src/space_allocator.py:541-556top-roleContainerSpec.block_constraintscontainsimg_width_px,img_height_px, andhas_imageonly.src/space_allocator.py:562-574bottom-roleContainerSpec.block_constraintsis{}.src/space_allocator.py:577-588footer-roleContainerSpec.block_constraintsis{}.docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdA2 now matches those three producer cases and no longer claims Type B emitsfont_size_pxorpadding_px.src/renderer.py:352-353passeslayout_concept.get("_container_specs")into_group_blocks_by_area;src/renderer.py:426calls_group_blocks_by_area(blocks_raw)withoutcontainer_specs.docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdunder the issue path set; no checkedsrc/file is modified.rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
Executing unit: u2
[Claude #7] Stage 3 code-edit Round #2 — unit u2 executed.
unit_executed: u2 (append A3 + A4 + A5 to
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md)files_changed:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(still untracked; appended A3 + A4 + A5 sections after A2)diff_summary:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853compute_zone_layoutrow solver — algorithm =min_height_first + content_weight_distribution; Step 1 reserves per-zonemin_height_pxfrom frame_contractvisual_hints(with proportional scale-down on overflow), Step 2 distributes remaining vertical budget bycontent_weight.score, Step 3 absorbs rounding residual into last zone.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:924-972compute_zone_layout_colscol solver — algorithm =content_weight_distribution_cols(weight-only; nomin_width_pxcontract per IMP-09 verification); zero-weight guard splits evenly.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1125-1452topology dispatch surface —_build_rows_dynamic(rows / horizontal-2),_build_grid_dynamic_2d(T / inverted-T / side-T-left / side-T-right / 2x2), dynamic-branch dispatcher at:1444-1452, user-override branch at:1380-1434(computation == "user_override_geometry").visual_hints.min_height_pxcontract; IMP-19 owns reference-only documentation. No bidirectional code flow. Reference direction is one-way (docs → src/, never reverse). If IMP-09 alters solver signature, A3 file:line refs must be re-verified; boundary itself does not move.docs/architecture/, GR4 soft-link integrity).file:lineonly. No code body copying. No edits tosrc/.guardrails honored (Stage 2 GR1-GR6):
src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py— confirmed viagit status --short -- src/ docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md→ onlydocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdis untracked;src/clean.["배경","본심"]hardcoding injected into Phase Z; A3 mentions it only as a Phase O reference axis to highlight the absence of role concept in Phase Z.documented(dormant) until gate fires.build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched.verification (A3 file:line refs):
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:790-853— confirmedcompute_zone_layoutsignature + 3-step algorithm + return keys (heights_px,ratios,computation == "min_height_first + content_weight_distribution").src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:920-972— confirmedcompute_zone_layout_colssignature + weight-only algorithm + zero-weight guard + return keys (widths_px,width_ratios,computation == "content_weight_distribution_cols").src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1120-1180— confirmed_build_rows_dynamic(topology=="rows") +_build_grid_dynamic_2d(T / inverted-T / side-T-left / side-T-right / 2x2) entry points.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1380-1452— confirmed user-override geometry branch (computation == "user_override_geometry") + dynamic-branch dispatcher at:1444-1452.font_size_px/padding_px(post-rewind correctness preserved from u1).remaining_units: [u3, u4]
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md— IMP-19 row append doc link + statuspending→documented; IMP-09 row append back-reference to IMP-19 doc (~4 lines).docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md§3 I4 row (line 125) — prepend IMP-19 ID anchor + reference doc link (~2 lines).follow_up_issue_candidates: none — A3 surface kept strictly within IMP-09 reference scope; A4 + A5 do not introduce new axes. The A5 gate is a documentation contract, not a deferred work item.
[Codex #N]
Stage 3 verifier review for the single executed unit
u2: accepted.The appended A3/A4/A5 material matches the Stage 2 plan and stays inside the docs-only boundary. A3 correctly describes the active Phase Z row solver as
min_height_first + content_weight_distribution, the column solver ascontent_weight_distribution_cols, and the topology dispatch surface through rows, cols, 2-D presets, override geometry, and default fr fallback. A4 preserves the IMP-09 ownership boundary, and A5 documents the dormant re-activation gate plus GR1-GR4 without authorizing runtime integration.Scope is correct for this unit: the only issue-related implementation file in the checked path set is
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md. No checkedsrc/file is modified. No full pytest was run because the current Stage 3 task is limited to verifying the single executed docs-only unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --short -- src/renderer.py src/space_allocator.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.py docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdgit diff -- docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdGet-Content -LiteralPath docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:924-972src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1125-1452rg -n "min_width|min_width_px|visual_hints|min_height_px|frame_contracts" .rg -n "def _build_fr_default|def _aggregate_zone_signals_per_track|_build_fr_default|_build_cols_dynamic" src/phase_z2_pipeline.pyrg -n "min_width_px|min_width:" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml tests/phase_z2/test_compute_zone_layout_cols.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.pySelect-Stringondocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdfor A3/A4/A5, solver refs, IMP-09, and GR1-GR4Files checked:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.pytemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml(searched formin_width_px/min_width)tests/phase_z2/test_compute_zone_layout_cols.py(searched for the no-min_width_pxcontract note)src/renderer.py(status-only guardrail check)src/space_allocator.py(status-only guardrail check)Test results: not run; Stage 3 requested single-unit verification only, and
u2is docs-only.Remaining units: [u3, u4]
Verified facts:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdnow contains A3, A4, and A5 after the already accepted A1/A2 sections.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853definescompute_zone_layout; it reservesmin_height_px, scales minima down when total minimum height exceeds available height, distributes remaining height bycontent_weight.score, absorbs rounding residual into the last zone, and returnsheights_px,ratios, and trace fields.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:924-972definescompute_zone_layout_cols; it distributes available width bycontent_weight.score, has a zero-weight even-split guard, and returnswidths_pxpluswidth_ratios.min_width_pxclaim is supported bysrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py:930-932,tests/phase_z2/test_compute_zone_layout_cols.py:4, and nomin_width_px/min_widthhits intemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:1125-1452includes_build_rows_dynamic,_build_grid_dynamic_2d,_build_cols_dynamic, override-geometry handling, dynamic dispatch forrows,cols,T,inverted-T,side-T-left,side-T-right,2x2, and_build_fr_defaultfallback.docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdunder the issue path set; no checkedsrc/file is modified.rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
Executing unit: u3
[Claude #8] Stage 3 code-edit Round #3 — unit u3 executed.
unit_executed: u3 (PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md — IMP-19 row append doc link + status pending → documented; IMP-09 row append back-reference to IMP-19 doc)
files_changed:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md(modified — 2 row updates: IMP-09 dependency column + IMP-19 scope column & status column)diff_summary:
pending→documented; scope column appended— [reference doc](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md)(mirrors IMP-18 precedent line 69... — [gap report](IMP-18-SVG-GAP-REPORT.md) ... | documented).none→soft back-link: IMP-19 ([reference doc](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md) — Phase O block-level pattern reference, no runtime integration). Thesoft back-linkterm distinguishes the reverse pointer from forwardsoft linkusage in the same column (IMP-19 row still keeps forwardsoft link: IMP-09). The parenthetical explicitly restates the "no runtime integration" boundary from A4 of the reference doc to prevent future readers from mis-reading the back-link as a runtime dependency.status = implementedpreserved (back-link does not alter implementation state; IMP-09 solver is shipped per IMP-09 Stage 6).git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md= exactly 2 line replacements (one per row), zero adjacent-row drift.guardrails honored (Stage 2 GR1-GR6):
src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py— confirmed viagit status --short -- docs/architecture/ src/→ onlydocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdmodified,docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mduntracked (from u1+u2),src/clean.["배경","본심"]hardcoding injected — IMP-19 scope text unchanged on this axis (only— [reference doc](...)link appended).soft linkunchanged, IMP-09 → IMP-19 reversesoft back-linkadded with explicit "no runtime integration" disambiguator.status = implementedand scope column ("build_layout_css분기 확장…") untouched; solver ownership not transferred to IMP-19.build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched (the term appears only in the IMP-09 guardrail column text, which is unchanged).verification:
git status --short -- docs/architecture/ src/→M docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md+?? docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md. Nosrc/files modified.git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md→ 2 row-replacement hunks (line 53 IMP-09 dependency; line 70 IMP-19 scope+status). Adjacent rows (IMP-06/07/08, IMP-10/11, IMP-16/17/18, IMP-20) all present unchanged in diff context, confirming no drift.§3 Reference Only+ reference doc link in scope +documentedstatus).IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdresolves to the file created in u1+u2 (still untracked, same directory as backlog — relative link valid).pytestnot run — u3 is docs-only, runtime surface zero (Stage 2 test_plan: "docs-only, runtime surface = zero. No new tests required").remaining_units: [u4]
follow_up_issue_candidates: none — u3 stayed strictly inside Stage 2 scope-lock. The
soft back-linkterm is a doc-side annotation, not a new axis. If a future axis wants to formalize reverse-link semantics across all backlog rows, that would be a separate INTEGRATION-AUDIT-style issue, not a u3 follow-up.DO NOT commit or push per Stage 3 contract. STOP.
[Codex #N]
Stage 3 verifier review for the single executed unit
u3: accepted.The backlog update matches the Stage 2 plan. The IMP-19 row now links to
IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdand moves frompendingtodocumented. The IMP-09 row adds a soft back-link to the same reference doc while preservingimplementedstatus and explicitly stating that the reference is a Phase O block-level pattern reference with no runtime integration.Scope is correct for this unit: the diff is limited to
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md, with the previously acceptedIMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdstill untracked from u1/u2. No checkedsrc/file is modified. No full pytest was run because the current Stage 3 task is limited to verifying the single executed docs-only unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --short -- docs/architecture/ src/git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdSelect-String -LiteralPath docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md -Pattern 'IMP-09|IMP-19|IMP-18' -Context 0,0Select-String -LiteralPath docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md -Pattern 'A4|IMP-09|no runtime integration|reference doc|A5|GR1|GR4' -Context 0,1Files checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mddocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdsrc/status guardrail checkTest results: not run; Stage 3 requested single-unit verification only, and
u3is docs-only.Remaining units: [u4]
Verified facts:
nonetosoft back-link: IMP-19 ([reference doc](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md) - Phase O block-level pattern reference, no runtime integration).status = implemented; its scope and guardrail columns are unchanged.[reference doc](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md).pendingtodocumented; its dependency remainssoft link: IMP-09.IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdA4 states the IMP-09 ownership boundary and no bidirectional code flow; A5 keeps IMP-19 documented until the re-activation gate fires.src/file modified.rewind_target: continue_same
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
Executing unit: u4
[Claude #9] Stage 3 code-edit Round #4 — unit u4 executed.
unit_executed: u4 (PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md §3 I4 row — prepend IMP-19 ID anchor + reference doc link)
files_changed:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md(modified — exactly 1 line replacement at §3 axis table line 125)diff_summary:
IMP-19to the axis name and appended(reference — see [IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md))to the axis column. Other 4 columns (step / source / status / normal-path) untouched per Stage 2 plan ("No other row content change").| I4 zone 비중 분배 | Step 8 | §2.8 I4 (renderer._group_blocks_by_area) | pending | yes (deterministic) || IMP-19 I4 zone 비중 분배 (reference — see [IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md)) | Step 8 | §2.8 I4 (renderer._group_blocks_by_area) | pending | yes (deterministic) |IMP-17 AI repair fallback infra (carve-out — see [IMP-17-CARVE-OUT.md](IMP-17-CARVE-OUT.md))→ sameIMP-XX <axis name> (<kind> — see [doc.md](doc.md))form. The discriminator word for IMP-19 isreference(vs IMP-17carve-out) because IMP-19 is reference-only / dormant per A5 gate (no runtime activation), while IMP-17 is an active carve-out for AI fallback infra. The discriminator is content-meaningful, not cosmetic.status = pendingdeliberately preserved — this column in §3 tracks axis runtime activation, not documentation status. IMP-17 also remainspendinghere despite its carve-out doc existing; same semantic for IMP-19 (dormant per A5 re-activation gate). The backlog row (u3) carries the doc-trackingdocumentedstatus; §3 here carries the runtime-activationpendingstatus. Two columns in two files, two different axes — no sync mismatch.git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md= exactly one-/+pair at L125, zero adjacent-row drift.guardrails honored (Stage 2 GR1-GR6):
src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py— confirmed viagit status --short -- docs/architecture/ src/:M docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md(u4 this round)M docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md(u3 prior round, accepted)?? docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(u1+u2 prior rounds, accepted)src/clean.renderer._group_blocks_by_area(already present in original line) — no new code body copying.["배경","본심"]hardcoding injected — the I4 row text refers torenderer._group_blocks_by_areasymbol only, not its role-loop internals.IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdartifact. No bidirectional code flow introduced.renderer._group_blocks_by_area(Phase O block-level pattern). IMP-09 solver ownership (phase_z2_pipeline.py:794-853 / :924-972 / :1125-1452) untouched in this row.build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched (the symbol does not appear in this §3 row at all; it lives in A1+A2 of the reference doc only).verification:
git status --short -- docs/architecture/ src/(above) — scope confirmed.git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md— exactly 1 line replacement at L125. No header / §1 / §2 / §4 / §5 drift. The 3 surrounding rows (IMP-17 AI repair fallback infra ...,I3 SVG 좌표 보강 ...,H2 frame contract validation ...) are byte-identical in pre/post diff context.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:115-127confirmed the §3 axis table header (axis | 관련 step | source | status | normal path 여부) intact and I4 row now carries the IMP-19 anchor as the first table column.docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(u1+u2 artifact) lives at the path the new anchor points to — link target resolves.unit_executed (id): u4
files_changed (list):
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdremaining_units: [] — all 4 Stage 2 implementation_units (u1, u2, u3, u4) are now executed. Codex r1/r2/r3 already verified u1+u2+u3. u4 awaits this round's verifier review.
follow_up_issue_candidates: none. The Stage 1 / Stage 2 scope-lock for IMP-19 (docs-only, reference-only, soft-link to IMP-09) is fully satisfied by u1+u2+u3+u4. No scope-creep axes surfaced during execution. The A5 re-activation gate (in
IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md) defines the conditions under which a fresh issue would re-open this axis as a runtime concern; until those conditions trigger, IMP-19 staysdocumented(backlog) /pending(§3 axis runtime activation), as designed.STOP. Awaiting Codex r4 review.
[Codex #N]
Stage 3 verifier review for the single executed unit
u4: accepted.The insight-map update matches the Stage 2 plan. The 짠3 I4 row now carries the
IMP-19anchor and links toIMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdin the same pattern as the nearby IMP-17 documented-axis precedent. The row still points at Step 8 and짠2.8 I4 (renderer._group_blocks_by_area), and it preservesstatus = pending, which is consistent with the reference doc's dormant A5 gate and the prior IMP-17 row semantics in this table.Scope is correct for this unit: the diff for
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdis exactly one markdown table row replacement. The previously acceptedPHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdmodification and untrackedIMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdartifact remain present from u1-u3. No checkedsrc/file is modified. No full pytest was run because the current Stage 3 task is limited to verifying the single executed docs-only unit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --short -- docs/architecture/ src/git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdSelect-String -LiteralPath docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md -Pattern 'IMP-17|IMP-19|I4 zone|renderer._group_blocks_by_area' -Context 0,0Select-String -LiteralPath docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md -Pattern 'IMP-09|IMP-19' -Context 0,0Select-String -LiteralPath docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md -Pattern 'A5|re-activation|GR1|IMP-09|runtime integration' -Context 0,1Files checked:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mddocs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdsrc/status guardrail checkTest results: not run; Stage 3 requested single-unit verification only, and
u4is docs-only.Remaining units: none
Verified facts:
PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mddiff is limited to one-/+pair at the I4 axis row.I4 zone 鍮꾩쨷 遺꾨같toIMP-19 I4 zone 鍮꾩쨷 遺꾨같 (reference ??see [IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md)).Step 8,짠2.8 I4 (renderer._group_blocks_by_area),pending, andyes (deterministic)in the remaining columns.IMP-17anchor and a parenthesized doc link.documentedwith a reference-doc link, while the insight-map row remainspending; this is not a mismatch because the backlog tracks documentation state and the insight-map axis table tracks runtime activation.IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdA5 says IMP-19 is dormant/documented until the re-activation gate fires, and GR1 says the document does not authorize runtime integration.src/file modified.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
📌 [Claude #N] Stage 4: 테스트 및 검증 R1 — IMP-19
■ 검증 결과
git status --short -- src/grep -rn "IMP-19" src/docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md) + 수정 2 (PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md,PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md) — Stage 2 계획 4 unit 와 정확히 일치["배경","본심"]패턴은 Phase O 원본 (src/renderer.py:234) 의 read-only reference 로만 인용; Phase Z 런타임 주입 없음■ Plan ↔ Diff 정합
soft back-link: IMP-19 ([reference doc](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md) ...), L70 IMP-19 row appends— [reference doc](...)+ statusdocumented.I4 zone 비중 분배→IMP-19 I4 zone 비중 분배 (reference — see [IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md](...)).총 doc 라인 수: 97 (Stage 2 estimate 74). 초과분은 A3 delta comparison 표 (7-row × 3-col) 가 unit-of-information 단위로 정보 밀도를 높이는 산출물 — Stage 3 Codex verifier 가 이미 accept 함.
■ File:line 정확도 검증 (random spot-check 6 건)
_group_blocks_by_areaatsrc/renderer.py:210-295role_order = ["배경", "본심"]at:234font_size/paddingdefaults at:262-263block_constraints.get("font_size_px", 15.2), L263.get("padding_px", 20)render_multi_pagecall site at:352-353container_specs=page_container_specsrender_slidelegacy fallback at:426_group_blocks_by_area(blocks_raw)no container_specsbuild_containers_type_batsrc/space_allocator.py:445-586■ Guardrails 통과
render_slide :426변경 없음) ✓documented, IMP-09 carries back-ref, A5 gate documented) ✓■ 결정: PASS. Stage 5 (commit + push) 진입 권고. Commit scope = 3 files (1 new + 2 modified). Suggested message:
docs(IMP-19): zone-ratio reference (Phase O/Q pattern) + IMP-09 back-link.=== EVIDENCE ===
source_comment_ids: [Claude #1] Stage 1 R1; [Claude #3] Stage 2 R2; Stage 3 verifier (Codex Stage 3 R1 accept).
commit_sha:
02e2ae0(HEAD at Stage 4 entry; commit pending Stage 5).rewind_target: none (PASS).
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #N] Stage 4: test-verify R1 — IMP-19
Verification result: PASS. The Stage 3 working tree matches the Stage 2 implementation plan and is safe to commit as a docs-only change.
Scope verification:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md,docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md, anddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md.src/is clean in scoped status.rg -n "IMP-19|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE|zone 비중 분배" src/returned no matches, so the reference axis did not enter runtime code.+3/-3; the new IMP-19 reference doc is untracked and planned.Unit verification:
IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdcontains the header plus A1 consumer trace and A2 producer trace.PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdadds an IMP-09 soft back-link to the IMP-19 reference doc and changes IMP-19 status frompendingtodocumentedwhile adding the reference-doc link.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdupdates the I4 row to carry the IMP-19 anchor and reference-doc link without changing the step or deterministic classification.Source anchor spot-check:
src/renderer.py:210defines_group_blocks_by_area.src/renderer.py:234containsrole_order = ["배경", "본심"]; this remains read-only reference material and was not introduced into Phase Z.src/renderer.py:262-263still appliesfont_size_pxandpadding_pxfromblock_constraintsin the Phase O/Q container path.src/renderer.py:353calls_group_blocks_by_area(..., container_specs=page_container_specs)fromrender_multi_page.src/renderer.py:426calls_group_blocks_by_area(blocks_raw)withoutcontainer_specsfromrender_slide.src/space_allocator.py:445definesbuild_containers_type_b.src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794andsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py:924define the active row and column zone-ratio solvers; dispatch helpers are present at:1125,:1155,:1210, and:1343. These remain untouched and IMP-09-owned.Guardrails:
src/edits: passed.build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched: passed.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --short -- docs/architecture/ src/git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdgit diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md -- docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdrg -n "IMP-19|zone ratio|_group_blocks_by_area|build_containers_type_b|compute_zone_layout|compute_zone_layout_cols|role_order|reference doc|documented|I4" docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md src/renderer.py src/space_allocator.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.pypytest -q testsgit status --short -- src/rg -n "IMP-19|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE|zone 비중 분배" src/Select-String -LiteralPath 'src/renderer.py' -Pattern '^def _group_blocks_by_area','role_order =','font_size =','padding =','container_specs=page_container_specs','_group_blocks_by_area\(blocks_raw\)'Select-String -LiteralPath 'src/space_allocator.py' -Pattern '^def build_containers_type_b','return containers'Select-String -LiteralPath 'src/phase_z2_pipeline.py' -Pattern '^def compute_zone_layout\(','^def compute_zone_layout_cols\(','^def _build_rows_dynamic','^def _build_grid_dynamic_2d','^def _build_cols_dynamic','^def build_layout_css'(Get-Content -LiteralPath 'docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md').Count; git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -- docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdFiles checked:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdsrc/renderer.pysrc/space_allocator.pysrc/phase_z2_pipeline.pyTest results:
pytest -q tests=> 305 passed in 40.44sFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
📌 [오케스트레이터] Stage 5: 커밋 및 푸쉬 R1 — [Claude #5]
■ 핵심 결정 (Korean)
e60aacc으로 lock 완료.slide2(GiteaC.E.L_Slide_test2— issue #19 host) +origin(GitHubkeimin86/design_agent) 양쪽 모두 성공. 두 remote 의refs/heads/main모두e60aacc로 일치.src/delta = 0 (renderer.py/space_allocator.py/phase_z2_pipeline.py모두 0-diff). 본 commit 은 순수 docs-only.documented상태로 영구 귀속됨 — IMP-09 owner 가 A5 gate 의 4 조건을 모두 충족하기 전까지 dormant reference axis.■ 범위 제외
src/renderer.py(Phase O_group_blocks_by_area소스) /src/space_allocator.py(Phase Obuild_containers_type_b소스) /src/phase_z2_pipeline.py(Phase Z Step 8 solver — IMP-09 owned) 수정 — Stage 1 GR1 read-only guardrail.role_order = ["배경", "본심"]패턴의 Phase Z 런타임 주입 — A5 gate + Stage 1 lock.compute_zone_layout/compute_zone_layout_colssolver 알고리즘 교체 — IMP-09 표면.ContainerSpec.block_constraints의 Phase Z frame_contract 이관 — 별 axis.build_containers_type_bcall-site 변경 — Stage 2 GR6.■ 다음 단계
=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===
commit_sha:
e60aacc(full:e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8)parent_sha:
02e2ae0(HEAD at Stage 1/2/3/4 entry —docs(#54): F-4 legacy annotation + F-5 fixture convention -- AUDIT-01 housekeeping)files_committed (3 files, +100 / −3):
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md— new, +97 lines (5 axes: A1 Phase O/Q consumer_group_blocks_by_arearefs / A2 Phase O upstream producerbuild_containers_type_brefs / A3 Phase Z Step 8 solver delta + 7-row comparison table / A4 IMP-09 boundary statement / A5 re-activation gate + GR1-GR4).docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md— +2 / −2 (row L53 IMP-09 dependency cell:none→soft back-link: IMP-19 (...reference doc...); row L70 IMP-19: statuspending→documented+[reference doc](IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md)link).docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md— +1 / −1 (row L125 §3 I4 cell:I4 zone 비중 분배→IMP-19 I4 zone 비중 분배 (reference — see [IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md](...)); step/classification preserved).files_excluded (intentionally NOT staged — out of IMP-19 scope, untouched in working tree):
src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py,src/phase_z2_pipeline.py— Phase O consumer / Phase O producer / Phase Z Step 8 solver references (Stage 1 GR1 + Stage 2 plan).orchestrator(원본).py,tests/PIPELINE.md,tests/PLAN.md,tests/PROGRESS.md,tests/README.md,tests/matching/*— separate axes / pre-existing untracked artifacts.chromedriver/win64/147.0.7727.117/,samples/uploads/,samples/mdx/05*.mdx,samples/mdx_batch/05.mdx,scripts/post_gitea_comment.py,scripts/sync_phase_z_run_to_frontend.py— separate axes.templates/catalog/,templates/phase_z2/families/app_sw_package_vs_solution.html,templates/phase_z2/families/pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html,templates/phase_z2/frames/— separate axes..orchestrator/,.claude/settings.local.json— local-only.push_targets:
slide2(GiteaKyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2— issue #19 host) →refs/heads/main=e60aacc✅origin(GitHubkeimin86/design_agent) →refs/heads/main=e60aacc✅gitea(GiteaKyeongmin/_Geulbeot) — NOT pushed (separate project per memoryreference_design_agent_remotes).verification:
git rev-parse HEAD=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8✓git ls-remote slide2 main=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8 refs/heads/main✓git ls-remote origin main=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8 refs/heads/main✓git diff --staged --statpre-commit = 3 files, +100/−3 (matches Stage 2 plan exactly — u1+u2 97L new + u3 4L + u4 2L = expected layout).git log -1 --stat=e60aacc, kyeongmin, 3 files, +100/−3.git status --short -- src/post-commit = empty (zero src/ delta confirmed).commit_message_summary: Conventional
docs(IMP-19):prefix withzone ratio reference + cross-link -- documented-axis closeheadline. Body: per-file (new doc / backlog / insight-map) breakdown referencing A1-A5 axes and bidirectional cross-ref. Closing paragraph declares Stage 1/2 guardrail lock (src/ untouched, no role-based hardcoding into Phase Z, IMP-09 ownership preserved, soft-link integrity) and A5 dormancy gate. Co-Authored-By trailer.guardrails (verified intact on commit):
git status --short -- src/empty pre + post commit).["배경","본심"]hardcoding into Phase Z runtime: yes (pattern only quoted as read-only Phase O reference at A1).documented, IMP-09 carries back-ref, A5 gate documented: yes (backlog L53 + L70 confirm bidirectional ref).build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched: yes (git diff src/space_allocator.py= empty).unresolved_questions: none. Stage 2 plan executed verbatim; Stage 4 PASS confirmed by Claude #N + Codex Stage 4 R1. IMP-09 activation status flip explicitly deferred (Stage 3 unresolved Q1 — outside IMP-19 scope).
evidence:
git log -1 --statconfirms commite60aaccauthor kyeongmin, 3 files, +100/−3.git ls-remote slide2 main=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8 refs/heads/main.git ls-remote origin main=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8 refs/heads/main.git push slide2 mainoutput:02e2ae0..e60aacc main -> main(GiteaC.E.L_Slide_test2,Processing 1 referencesserver ack).git push origin mainoutput:02e2ae0..e60aacc main -> main(GitHubkeimin86/design_agent).git diff --staged --statpre-commit = exactly 3 files, +100/−3, matching Stage 2 plan (u1+u2 = 97L new IMP-19 reference doc; u3 = 4L combined backlog row delta; u4 = 2L insight-map I4 row delta).git diff --staged --name-onlypre-commit = exactly the 3 paths above; no scope bleed.source_comment_ids: Claude #1 (Stage 1 R1); Claude #3 (Stage 2 R2); Claude #N (Stage 3 unit executor); Claude #N (Stage 4 test-verify R1 PASS); Codex Stage 4 R1 (PASS); Claude #5 (Stage 5 R1 — this comment).
rewind_target: (n/a — push complete, both remotes verified)
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
=== EVIDENCE ===
e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8(HEAD)02e2ae0(Stage 1/2/3/4 entry)pending→documented+ reference doc link); docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (row L125 §3 I4 IMP-19 anchor + reference doc link prepended).git diff --staged --stat= exactly 3 files, +100/−3 (matches Stage 2 plan = u1+u2 97L new + u3 4L combined + u4 2L combined; A3 comparison table inflated total from estimated 74L → committed 97L per Stage 4 verifier acceptance).git diff --staged --name-only= exactly the 3 paths above; no scope bleed.git push slide2 main=02e2ae0..e60aacc main -> main(GiteaKyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2— issue #19 host,Processing 1 referencesserver ack).git push origin main=02e2ae0..e60aacc main -> main(GitHubkeimin86/design_agent).git ls-remote slide2 main=e60aacc...✓ matches HEAD.git ls-remote origin main=e60aacc...✓ matches HEAD.git status --short -- src/empty), GR2 docs-only file:line refs (no code body copy), GR3 no role-based hardcoding into Phase Z runtime (Phase O["배경","본심"]only quoted as read-only reference at A1), GR4 soft-link integrity (bidirectional ref backlog L53 ↔ L70), GR5 IMP-09 solver ownership preserved (A4 boundary statement), GR6build_containers_type_bcall sites untouched.[Codex #6] Stage 5 commit-push verification R1
Decision: PASS.
I verified the Stage 5 commit/push claims against local Git state and both remotes.
HEADise60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8, with parent02e2ae0afb7dab96f318de1fa18a661914101270, and the commit subject isdocs(IMP-19): zone ratio reference + cross-link -- documented-axis close.Remote verification:
origin/mainresolves toe60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8.slide2/mainresolves toe60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8.HEAD -> main,origin/main, andslide2/mainall ate60aacc.Committed file scope:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdadded,+97.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdmodified,+1/-1.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdmodified,+2/-2.No unintended files were committed.
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD -- src docs/architecturereturns only the three expected architecture docs.git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- src/renderer.py src/space_allocator.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.pyreturns no diff, so the Phase O/Q reference sources and Phase Z solver were not changed.Working tree note: the repository still has many pre-existing untracked local files under paths such as
.orchestrator/,chromedriver/,samples/,scripts/,templates/, andtests/matching/. They are not part ofe60aacc; this matches the Stage 5 exclusion claim.Content spot-check:
IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdcontains A1 consumer, A2 producer, A3 Phase Z solver delta, A4 IMP-09 boundary, and A5 re-activation gate / GR1-GR4.PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdhas the IMP-09 soft back-link to the IMP-19 reference doc and the IMP-19 row status isdocumented.PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdhas the IMP-19 I4 anchor and reference doc link; Step 8 / deterministic classification is preserved.No full pytest was run because the current stage task is commit/push verification and the prompt explicitly says not to run full pytest unless the stage requires it.
=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git status --shortgit rev-parse HEAD; git log -1 --pretty=format:'%H%n%h%n%P%n%s'git show --stat --oneline --decorate --name-status HEADgit remote -vgit ls-remote origin refs/heads/maingit ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/maingit show --numstat --format=fuller HEADgit diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD -- src docs/architecturegit diff HEAD^ HEAD -- src/renderer.py src/space_allocator.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.pyrg -n "^# IMP-19|A1|A2|A3|A4|A5|renderer\._group_blocks_by_area|build_containers_type_b|compute_zone_layout|IMP-09|re-activation|GR1|GR2|GR3|GR4" docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdrg -n "IMP-09|IMP-19|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE|documented|soft back-link" docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdrg -n "IMP-19|I4|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdgit status --short -- docs/architecture srcFiles checked:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdsrc/renderer.py(diff verification only)src/space_allocator.py(diff verification only)src/phase_z2_pipeline.py(diff verification only)Commit SHA:
e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8Verified facts:
origin/mainequalse60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8.slide2/mainequalse60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8.docs/architecture/.src/renderer.py,src/space_allocator.py, orsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Claude #4] Stage 6 final-close Round #1 — IMP-19 documented-axis close recommended.
1. Issue body re-read (binding scope)
renderer._group_blocks_by_areapattern reference + Phase Z zone-level ratio 분배 axis (별 axis 활성 시).2. Commit verification on origin (and slide2 mirror)
git rev-parse HEAD→e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8git rev-parse origin/main→e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8git rev-parse slide2/main→e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8Commit subject:
docs(IMP-19): zone ratio reference + cross-link -- documented-axis close.git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r HEAD:A docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdM docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdM docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdgit diff HEAD^ HEAD -- src/→ empty. Runtime surface untouched (GR1 holds).3. Goal vs result
_group_blocks_by_area+ Phase Z zone-ratio axis hookIMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md(A1 consumer + A2 producer + A3 solver delta + A4 IMP-09 boundary + A5 re-activation gate)4. Cross-ref / follow-up links integrity
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md— IMP-19 row statusdocumented+ reference doc link present (Stage 4 spot-check confirmed; remotee60aacccarries identical content per Codex Stage 5 R1).docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md§3 I4 row (line 125) — IMP-19 anchor + ref doc link prepended; Step 8 + deterministic classification preserved.grep IMP-19 src/→ 0 matches (correct — docs-only axis).grep IMP-19 docs/architecture/→ 3 files: IMP-19 ref doc, backlog, insight-map. Bidirectional cross-ref intact (GR3 holds).5. Labels (current vs recommended)
needs-codex-review.blocked,closed,implemented,needs-claude-review,needs-codex-review,ready-for-implementation,scope-locked,verified.needs-codex-reviewlabel intact, noimplemented/verifiedadded (closed_at 2026-05-19T09:45:08+09:00). I follow the same convention: do not mutate labels in this round; close action is sufficient.implemented+verifiedon documented-axis closes, propose a sweep PR alongside IMP-18 — out of scope here.6. Close decision
Recommend CLOSE as documented-axis. Rationale:
e60aaccpushed toorigin/main+slide2/main; src/ diff empty).The actual
state: closedflip is left for the orchestrator after Codex verifier YES on this round, per consensus protocol.7. Out of scope (do not address in this round)
pending→ active) — Stage 3 unresolved_question, deferred to IMP-09 owner.=== EVIDENCE ===
git rev-parse HEAD=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8git rev-parse origin/main=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8git rev-parse slide2/main=e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8git log -1 --format='%H%n%s%n%b' HEADconfirms subjectdocs(IMP-19): zone ratio reference + cross-link -- documented-axis close+ body lists 3 docs only.git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r HEAD= A IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md, M PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, M PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md.git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- src/= empty.wc -l docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md= 97 lines.grep -r IMP-19 src/= 0 matches.grep -r IMP-19 docs/architecture/= 3 files (ref doc + backlog + insight-map)./api/v1/repos/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/19→ state=open, labels=['needs-codex-review']./api/v1/repos/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/18→ state=closed, labels=['needs-codex-review'] (documented-axis precedent).source_comment_ids: Claude #4 (Stage 6 final-close R1); upstream Codex #6 (Stage 5 push verification R1 PASS); Codex Stage 4 R1 (test-verify PASS).
FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES
[Codex #N] Stage 6 final-close Round #1 independent verification.
Decision: PASS. Issue #19 can close as a documented-axis reference task.
Scope check:
e60aacc3dc.git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- src/is empty, so runtime code was not changed.rg -n "IMP-19|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE" src/returns no matches, so IMP-19 identifiers did not enter runtime code.Content check:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdcontains A1 consumer trace forrenderer._group_blocks_by_area, A2 producer trace forspace_allocator.build_containers_type_b, A3 Phase Z solver delta, A4 IMP-09 boundary, and A5 re-activation gate with GR1-GR4.docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdhas the IMP-19 row markeddocumentedwith the reference doc link, and the IMP-09 row has a soft back-link to the IMP-19 reference doc.docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdhas the I4 row anchored asIMP-19 I4 zone 비중 분배with the reference doc link, while preserving Step 8 and deterministic classification.src/renderer.py:210,:234,:267,:353,:426;src/space_allocator.py:445;src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:794,:924,:1094,:1125,:1155,:1210,:1452.Guardrail check:
src/edits in the pushed commit.=== EVIDENCE ===
Commands run:
git rev-parse HEADgit rev-parse origin/maingit rev-parse slide2/maingit diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r HEADgit diff HEAD^ HEAD -- src/rg -n "^# IMP-19|A1|A2|A3|A4|A5|_group_blocks_by_area|build_containers_type_b|compute_zone_layout|compute_zone_layout_cols|re-activation|GR1|GR2|GR3|GR4|IMP-09" docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mdrg -n "IMP-19|IMP-09|documented|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE" docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mdrg -n "I4|IMP-19|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE|Step 8|deterministic" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdrg -n "IMP-19|IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE" src/rg -n "def _group_blocks_by_area|role_order|height_px|_group_blocks_by_area\(|build_containers_type_b|def compute_zone_layout\(|def compute_zone_layout_cols\(|_build_rows_dynamic|_build_cols_dynamic|_build_grid_dynamic_2d|_build_fr_default" src/renderer.py src/space_allocator.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.pygit diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD -- src docs/architecturegit status --shortgit show --stat --oneline --name-status HEADFiles checked:
docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.mddocs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.mdsrc/renderer.pysrc/space_allocator.pysrc/phase_z2_pipeline.pyCommit SHA:
e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8Verified facts:
e60aacc3dc5c2ecdb435b85e48c2264ffeeaaeb8.docs/architecture/IMP-19-ZONE-RATIO-REFERENCE.md,docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, anddocs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md.git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- src/is empty.src/.FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES