프로젝트의 왜 / 무엇을 위해 / 어떻게 라는 질문에 대한 master 답.
이 문서가 있으면 매번 처음부터 framing 설명할 필요 없음.
구조:
1. Destination — Phase Z 22-step + AI zone-fit frame generation
2. Q~Y 검토 = 이미 완료 (과거형). 결과 = INSIGHT-MAP + 28 초기 이슈.
3. INSIGHT-MAP catalog 구조 (§0~§5)
4. IMP 이슈 좌표 체계 (관련 step + source + priority + scope + guardrails)
5. orchestrator 의 disciplined executor 역할 (Claude + Codex 합의)
6. Audit cycle (meta-governance) — 발견은 follow-up 이슈로 분리
7. 도착점 도달 기준 5 항목
8. 자주 헷갈리는 anti-patterns (heritage 보존 X, MDX 최적화 X 등)
9. 핵심 참조 문서 인덱스
10. 한 줄 요약
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Audit follow-up F-2 (INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01 §10.2). Phase Z families surface
showed 11 tracked / 11 contracted / 13 on disk. The 2 untracked WIP files
(app_sw_package_vs_solution.html, pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html)
are now declared in _WIP_FILES.md as uncontracted and out-of-scope for the
runtime matcher; promote/remove is gated on #42. The 11/11 tracked +
contracted baseline is unchanged. A new pytest enforces tracked families ↔
frame_contracts.yaml set-equality modulo the WIP allowlist parsed from
_WIP_FILES.md, so future drift fails fast in CI before #42 expands to 32
frames.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Append IMP-50 audit completion row referencing INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01-REPORT
(commit 8c7d693) with CONDITIONAL GO for #19 decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Issue: #48 (IMP-15 실행-4, axis 4: debug.json + spec doc trace).
Parent: #15. Depends on 실행-1/2/3 (events + classifier outputs).
Surfaces the image/table event streams that 실행-1/2/3 already produced
and consumed, mirroring the existing `zone_geometries_px` top-level
precedent (no new pattern introduced). Adds the matching taxonomy row
to the Phase Z fit-classifier/router spec.
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py (+3):
- write_debug_json now lifts `image_events` and `table_events` to
top-level of `debug.json` via `(visual_runtime_check or {}).get(<k>, [])`,
exactly mirroring the immediately preceding `zone_geometries_px`
surfacing line. Defaults to `[]` when `visual_runtime_check` is None
— additive, no consumer-visible breakage.
docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-FIT-CLASSIFIER-ROUTER-SPEC.md (+1):
- §3.1 taxonomy adds `image_aspect_mismatch` row. Row text explicitly
marks the signal as post-render `fail_reasons` from Step 14
visual_runtime_check (rendered vs declared aspect ratio mismatch),
NOT a router-routed fit_classifier output, and notes the separate
`image_events` stream surface. Prevents future readers from wiring
this taxonomy into §3.2 priority list or §4 router action map.
tests/phase_z2/test_debug_json_event_surfacing.py (new, 2 tests):
- `test_write_debug_json_surfaces_image_and_table_events` invokes
write_debug_json with synthetic visual_runtime_check containing
both event lists; reads back the on-disk debug.json and asserts
both keys are present at top level with the exact payloads.
- `test_write_debug_json_defaults_when_visual_runtime_check_none`
asserts both new keys default to `[]` when visual_runtime_check
is None — guards the defensive `(… or {})` pattern.
tests/phase_z2/test_spec_taxonomy_image_aspect_mismatch.py (new, 2 tests):
- `test_spec_has_image_aspect_mismatch_row` opens the spec file and
asserts exactly one `^\| image_aspect_mismatch \|` row exists
inside the §3.1 table block (no markdown-parser dependency).
- `test_spec_row_marks_post_render_fail_reasons_semantic` asserts the
row text carries both "Post-render" and "fail_reasons" tokens —
enforces the Stage 1 guardrail wording.
Verification (Stage 4 PASS, Claude + Codex independent):
- pytest -q tests/phase_z2/test_debug_json_event_surfacing.py \
tests/phase_z2/test_spec_taxonomy_image_aspect_mismatch.py
→ 4 passed in 0.07s.
- git diff scope: 4 files, +148 insertions / 0 deletions.
Scope-locked: no edits to classifier (실행-3), event generation
(실행-1/2), Step 21 viewer, §3.2 priority list, §4 router action
mapping, or `table_self_overflow` taxonomy row. Pre-existing
dirty/untracked working-tree files left untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Re-apply the W1 wording clarifications previously agreed in the comment
thread. The originally executed wording commit `6d33884` was reverted by
Codex via `c807b2c` after Codex acknowledged that `ㄱ` for both Claude and
Codex is comment-only review (no source/doc edit). Both sides 100%
agreement is restored via Claude rounds 16/17/19 and Codex rounds 15/18.
This Claude-applied commit is the agreed re-application path (option A).
Six fixes applied to docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md :
1. §2 ACTIVE 4 frames table : add resource status (A/T/I/F/S) column.
F13 has no `assets/` directory (marked `-`). State that ACTIVE means
catalog-registered / runtime-active, not necessarily A+T+I+F+S
resource-complete.
2. §4 Track B : strengthen wording. Track B = visual-resource-pending
inside the 32-frame scope, **NOT exclusion / discard / scope
reduction**. Visual-resource acquisition timing is the only difference.
3. §4 Track B option (b) : minimal CSS partial from analysis/texts only
is **main path X, explicit temporary placeholder only**. Avoids the
frame 1 (`three_persona_benefits` 556b448) quality failure pattern.
4. §4.1 Track A priority : **execution ordering only, NOT scope filter**.
All 16 reusable-now frames remain activation targets. V4-weak 11
frames stay in scope. Builder family grouping = secondary ordering
allowed after first refinement calibration.
5. §4.1 Codex review granularity explicit : first refinement, new builder
pattern, ambiguous mapping, shared catalog/builder logic = Codex
review mandatory. Low-risk repeated frames may be grouped only after
pattern is proven.
6. §4.1 calibration failure modes F1/F2/F3 (Claude round 14 catch + Codex
round 15 (a) accepted) :
- F1 small styling/wording issue -> same-frame follow-up commit +
Codex re-review.
- F2 approach-level problem -> pause Track A, approach re-lock round,
retry refinement.
- F3 scope/resource problem -> reopen scope/resource axis, possibly
IMP-04b, block bulk activation until resolved.
History trace : `fe766f1` (matrix base) -> `6d33884` (Codex W1 execute,
wrong workflow) -> `c807b2c` (Codex revert + workflow lock symmetric)
-> this commit (Claude re-apply under user execution signal, option A).
History noise retained as honest trace of the corrected ㄱ definition.
No source code changes. Documentation clarification only.
Refs Gitea #4 (IMP-04 — matrix wording re-application post-revert)
- Add active-frame resource status and clarify catalog-active versus resource-complete.\n- Clarify Track B as visual-resource-pending inside the 32-frame scope, not exclusion.\n- Clarify Track A priority as execution order, not scope filter.\n- Add Codex review granularity and calibration failure modes for the first refinement.\n- Mark minimal CSS from analysis/texts as temporary placeholder only.
- Classify pipeline.py as Archive-heavy with Salvage Candidate 0
- Record Phase Q/R'/T execution flow as outside Phase Z normal path
- Mark deterministic pipeline utilities as Reference Only
- Mark pipeline_context.py schema and lifecycle methods as Reference Only
- Surface §1 B-1 as indirect surface, not direct composition planner
- Add §5-1 dated entry for 2026-05-12
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Classify §2.10 as Mixed with Salvage Candidate 0
- Mark utilities / matching helpers / Phase Q-2 filtering as Reference Only
- Record block_reference high-level entries as Phase R' reference path Archive
- Record block_selector format_candidates_for_prompt as Kei prompt formatter Archive
- Surface §1 A-2 indirect, catalog duplication, block_selector legacy as separate axes
- Add §5-1 dated entry for 2026-05-12
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Classify html_generator.py as Archive-heavy with Salvage Candidate 0
- Record AI HTML generation path as Phase R' Archive Candidate
- Mark deterministic duplicate helpers as Reference Only
- Surface A-3/A-4 mapping mismatch as a factual note
- Add §5-1 dated entry for 2026-05-12
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Classify renderer.py as Mixed with Salvage Candidate 0
- Mark Jinja/catalog/template rendering helpers as Reference Only
- Record render_slide_from_html Phase R' path as Archive Candidate
- Clarify A-3 as indirect preview render surface
- Clarify A-4 as slide-base impact surface without conditional CSS implementation
- Add §5-1 dated entry for 2026-05-12
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Classify content_verifier.py as Mixed (Reference Only + Archive Candidate)
- Mark deterministic utilities (text extraction, Korean normalization, verification logic) as Reference Only — Phase Z normal path direct slot absent
- Mark Kei artifact detection (verify_no_forbidden_content + FORBIDDEN_KEI_MEMOS) and Kei AI generation retry loop (generate_with_retry) as Archive Candidate
- Clarify L4 Selenium / L5 Opus vision are header documentation only (no implementation in this file)
- Record no §3 Salvage application target (Salvage Candidate 0)
- Surface §1 B-2 mapping as indirect; H1-H3 reference axis candidates, H4-H5 Archive markers, H6 L4/L5 factual note
- Add §5-1 dated entry for 2026-05-12
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Classify content_editor.py as Archive Candidate at module level
- Document Kei AI direct slot-fill flow (fill_content / fill_candidates / EDITOR_PROMPT)
- Mark Kei API infrastructure (_call_kei_editor_with_retry / _parse_json) as outside Phase Z normal path
- Record no §3 Salvage Plan target for this module
- Surface §1 B-1/B-2 candidate-file mapping mismatch and AI repair fallback infrastructure as separate axes
- Add §5-1 dated entry for 2026-05-12
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
문서 역할 분담:
- README : 프로젝트 개요 + 큰 그림 (가끔 갱신)
- OVERVIEW : 22 단계 도면 (구조 잠금)
- STATUS-BOARD : 각 단계 정확한 상태 (자주 갱신)
- CHANGE-LOG : 결정 변경 이력
- ROADMAP (신규): 진행 계획 + 당장 할 일 + 세부 todo (자주 갱신)
내용:
1. 현재 위치 (MDX03 정상 경로 통과)
2. 지금까지 완료한 작업 6 가지 영역
3. 22 단계 진행 수준 (추정 % 표 + STATUS-BOARD 단일 출처 caveat)
4. 큰 로드맵 7 단계
5. 세부 todo (5.1 보고용 프로토타입 우선 / 5.2~5.8 단계별)
6. 당장 실행 순서 (보고용 프로토타입 → 22 단계 정리 복귀)
7. 문서 역할 분담 표
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- consolidate evidence-based principles for Step 5/6/7 and B-axis matching layer
- record CompositionUnit, candidate-based composition, and 4-tier terminology
- defer bridge architecture and slot_payload evolution as scope-locked open items
- mark content object, internal region, and placement steps as partial
- record B1-B5 and trace-only runtime activation status
- refresh current missing items and bottleneck summary
- add Internal Region model to Phase Z architecture docs and specs
- add frame contract content type and Frame Slot declarations
- add dormant content object extractor and internal region planner
- 목표: MDX → BEPs 매칭 → 슬라이드 자동 생성
- 핵심 축: 표현 기준 통일, 블록 역할 재정의, direct-fit/recipe 2경로화
- 6단계 진행 계획: 토큰 → slide-base 분리 → 규칙 문서 → 폴더 정리 → 블록 전환 → 파이프라인 연결
- 역할 분리: figma_to_html_agent(원재료) / design_agent(조립 시스템)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
