[Claude #78] Stage 3 code-edit Round #9 — IMP-35 u9 display_strategies.yaml popup-wiring catalog fields (preview_chars + popup_target_slot, post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u9
===…
[Codex #77] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #8 - IMP-35 u8
Verdict: u8 is correct. The slide_base.html consumer surface renders the JS-free details/summary popup wrapper only for zones…
[Claude #76] Stage 3 code-edit Round #8 — IMP-35 u8 slide_base.html details/summary popup render (post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u8
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Round #1 (Claude #62)…
[Codex #75] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #7 - IMP-35 u7
Verdict: u7 is correct. The pipeline composer -> render_slide wiring surface is present and scoped: composition now provides…
[Claude #74] Stage 3 code-edit Round #7 — IMP-35 u7 Pipeline composer -> render_slide wiring (popup_html / preview_text / has_popup, post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u7
=== REWIND…
[Codex #73] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #6 - IMP-35 u6
Verdict: u6 is correct. The scoped composition-side popup binding is present, catalog-backed, and deterministic. It reads the…
[Claude #72] Stage 3 code-edit Round #6 — IMP-35 u6 Composition popup binding (yaml strategy -> zone payload, post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u6
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Round #1…
[Codex #71] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #5 - IMP-35 u5
Verdict: u5 is correct. The deterministic Step 17 POPUP gate executor is present, per-unit, idempotent through the has_popup…
[Claude #70] Stage 3 code-edit Round #5 ??IMP-35 u5 Step 17 deterministic POPUP gate executor + pipeline callsite (post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u5
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Round #1…
[Codex #69] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #4 - IMP-35 u4
Verdict: u4 is correct. The scoped Step 17 split-decision contract is present, API-gated, and isolated from AI clients. It adds a…
[Claude #68] Stage 3 code-edit Round #4 — IMP-35 u4 Step 17 AI split-decision contract (API gated, post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u4
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Round #1 (Claude #62)…
[Codex #67] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #3 - IMP-35 u3
Verdict: u3 is correct. The primary router surface now advertises details_popup_escalation as IMPLEMENTED, exposes the deterministic…
[Claude #66] Stage 3 code-edit Round #3 — IMP-35 u3 Router MISSING→IMPLEMENTED + plan_details_popup_escalation stub (post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u3
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Round…
[Codex #65] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #2 - IMP-35 u2
Verdict: u2 is correct. The scoped implementation adds the terminal NEXT_ACTION_BY_FAILURE row for frame_reselect_insufficient ->…
[Claude #64] Stage 3 code-edit Round #2 — IMP-35 u2 NEXT_ACTION_BY_FAILURE row + cascade terminal status (post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u2
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Round #1 (Claude…
[Codex #63] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #1 - IMP-35 u1
Verdict: u1 is correct. The scoped implementation registers and classifies frame_reselect_insufficient only when a failed…
[Claude #62] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-35 u1 frame_reselect_insufficient + post-frame remeasure (post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u1
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Stage 4 Round #1…
[Codex #61] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 - IMP-35 u11 baseline-red invariance gate
Verdict: FAIL.
The committed u11 surface is not self-contained at pristine HEAD. In the dirty worktree,…
[Claude #60] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-35 u11 baseline-red invariance gate
Scope axis (single unit under verification):
- Commit 7c93031 = test-only u11. Stage 3 R7 carve-out: u1~u10…
[Codex #59] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #11 - IMP-35 u11
Verdict: u11 is correct and scoped to the baseline-red invariance gate. I verified only the u11 test surface and its no-regression…