[Claude #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-46 (#62) router read-path fingerprint enforcement (post-#76-absorption, Axis R only)
Scope = Stage 1 allowed_edits + allowed_tests verbatim. All…
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review -- IMP-46 (#62)
Scope-lock result: Claude r1 is correct. The #76 absorption already landed the cache backend, structural signature, save gates, auto-cache flag,…
[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-46 (#62) residual scope after #76 absorption
Carve-out status (#76 absorption)
Commit 1186ad8 (#76 IMP-47B activation) absorbed substantially all of…
[Codex #93] Stage 6 final-close verification - IMP-35
Final independent verification result: PASS. I verified the landed code, commit lineage, remote refs, scoped file set, popup behavior…
[Claude #92] Stage 6 final-close — R1
Goal vs result (issue body scope + guardrails)
[Codex #91] Stage 5 commit-push verification - IMP-35 details_popup_escalation
Stage 5 verification result: PASS.
I verified the pushed commit and the remote state against the Stage 5 contract.…
[Claude #90] Stage 5 commit-push R1 — IMP-35 details_popup_escalation u1~u10 + Stage 3 R7 anchor re-pin
📌 **[오케스트레이터] Stage 5: 커밋 및 푸쉬 R1 — u1~u10 production + Stage 3 R7 anchor…
[Codex #89] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 - IMP-35 details_popup_escalation
Verdict: PASS. Stage 4 verification is sufficient to proceed to Stage 5 commit/push, with commit scope limited to the…
[Claude #88] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-35 details_popup_escalation u1~u11 (post anchor re-pin re-run)
Verdict: PASS — Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 PROCEED_TO_STAGE_5.
■ Test surface…
[Codex #87] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #1 - IMP-35 anchor re-pin follow-up
Verdict: the single follow-up unit is correct. The change is scope-local to `tests/orchestrator_unit/test_imp17…
[Claude #86] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-35 u1/u5/u7 anchor re-pin follow-up (post Stage 4 rewind)
Executing unit: u1_u5_u7_anchor_repin_followup
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Stage 4 test-verify…
[Codex #85] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 - IMP-35 details_popup_escalation
Stage 4 verdict: FAIL. The IMP-35 targeted surface and u11 baseline-red invariance gate pass, but the Stage 4 verificatio…
[Claude #84] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-35 details_popup_escalation u1~u11
Verifying the full IMP-35 surface (worktree u1~u10 production + committed u11 invariance gate 7c93031)…
[Codex #83] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #11 - IMP-35 u11
Verdict: u11 is correct. The baseline-red invariance gate is self-contained and matches the current baseline-area behavior:…
[Claude #82] Stage 3 code-edit Round #11 — IMP-35 u11 baseline-red invariance gate (final unit; post-rewind re-execution)
Executing unit: u11
=== REWIND CONTEXT === Rounds #1~#10 of this…
[Codex #81] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #10 - IMP-35 u10
Verdict: u10 is correct. The focused MDX preservation guard locks the rendered popup payload path so the popup body remains the…
[Claude #80] Stage 3 code-edit Round #10 — IMP-35 u10 MDX preservation invariant guardrail (popup_html = FULL raw_content; preview_text = leading-substring CUT; structural element no-drop;…
[Codex #79] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #9 - IMP-35 u9
Verdict: u9 is correct. The display strategy catalog now declares the popup-wiring fields required by the u6/u7/u8 popup path, with…