[Codex #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan verification
Decision: YES. The revised plan satisfies the Stage 2 compact-plan contract: it has === IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===, per-unit rationale, out-of-scope…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan (rewind fix: explicit EVIDENCE)
Issue-axis → unit: verify_structure ref → u1; Phase Z frame contract pattern + REQUIRED_PATTERNS 회귀 X guard + Phase Z…
[Codex r1]
Decision: NO. The plan now covers the technical axes and fixes the prior preamble/truncation problem, but it still fails the strict Stage 2 compact-plan contract because the submitted…
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- id: u1 summary: Create docs/architecture/IMP-20-FRAME-CONTRACT-VALIDATION-REFERENCE.md — header + A1 Phase Q consumer reference (content_verifier.py L382-392 /…
[Codex #3] Stage 2 plan verification R3
Decision: NO. The retry plan covers the issue axes and fixes the prior truncation, but it still fails the strict Stage 2 compact-plan and factual-verificati…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan R1 (retry — HTML-eating angle brackets removed)
Axis coverage: verify_structure ref → u1. Phase Z frame contract pattern → u2. REQUIRED_PATTERNS 값 회귀 X…
[Codex #2] Stage 2 plan verification R2
Decision: NO. The plan axes are mostly represented, and the required baseline test command passed, but the submitted Stage 2 plan body still fails the…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan R1 (retry — HTML-eating angle brackets removed)
Axis coverage: verify_structure ref → u1. Phase Z frame contract pattern → u2. REQUIRED_PATTERNS 값 회귀 X…
[Codex #1] Stage 2 plan verification R1
Decision: NO. The plan covers the implementation axes, keeps units within the Stage 2 size limit, and the required baseline test command passed, but the…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan R1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- id: u1 summary: Create docs/architecture/IMP-20-FRAME-CONTRACT-VALIDATION-REFERENCE.md skeleton + §A1 Phase Q consumer…
[Codex #1] Stage 2 plan verification R1
Decision: NO. The plan covers the main issue axes and keeps implementation units small, but it still fails the strict compact-plan contract for Stage 2 as…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R1 (post-rewind)
Rewind fix: full compact-plan sections + u4 rationale + status-board Step 10 row verified L49. Doc-only ref mirroring IMP-19. Zero runtime…
[Codex #1] Stage 2 plan verification R1
Decision: NO. The plan covers the issue axes and keeps implementation units small, but it still fails the strict compact-plan contract for Stage 2.
Verifie…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 - Simulation Plan R1
Doc-only ref mirroring IMP-19/IMP-18. Zero runtime surface. 4 atomic units.
Scope-axis coverage (every axis from issue body):
- scope `content_verifier.ve…
[Codex #1] Stage 2 plan verification R1
Decision: NO. The current Stage 2 simulation plan covers the issue axes and has small implementation units, but it still does not satisfy the strict…
[Claude #2] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R2 (rewind fix)
Codex r1 NO → re-emit with all compact-plan sections labeled and u4 rationale explicit. Unit split unchanged. Status-board Step 10 row line…
[Codex #1] Stage 2 plan verification R1
Decision: NO. The proposed implementation units are appropriately small and doc-only, but the Stage 2 plan is not complete under the compact-plan…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R1
Doc-only ref mirroring IMP-19/IMP-18. Zero runtime surface. 4 atomic units.
Scope-axis coverage (every axis from issue body):
- scope `content_verifier.v…
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review Round #1
Stage 1 verdict: root cause is valid, with two required corrections to the prior framing.
3-axis verification:
Axis A - Phase Q reference surface: -…
[Claude #1] Stage 1 — problem-review Round #1
1. Re-read of scope (backlog §2 IMP-20)
source = INSIGHT-MAP §3 / §2.7 H2 (content_verifier.verify_structure CSS pattern + 폰트 위계 검사) —…