ahnyongjooandClaude Sonnet 5.5
964a841de1
- Code\rebar_pipeline, review_pipeline, pier-program을 정션에서 실제 폴더로 전환 - Code\rhino_mcp 및 CLAUDE_rhino배경.md 추가, .mcp.json은 PYTHONPATH로 새 위치 사용 - pier-program 내부 .git 제거(이력은 backup\pier-program_20261028.bundle에 보관) - worktree 가이드 반영(CLAUDE.local.md, HANDOFF.md) - D:\Rhino-MCP 경로 참조를 새 위치로 치환 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
447 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
447 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
template: analysis
|
||
version: 1.3
|
||
description: PDCA Check phase document template with Context Anchor, Clean Architecture and Convention compliance checks
|
||
variables:
|
||
- feature: Feature name
|
||
- date: Creation date (YYYY-MM-DD)
|
||
- author: Author
|
||
- project: Project name (from package.json or agents.md)
|
||
- version: Project version (from package.json)
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# {feature} Analysis Report
|
||
|
||
> **Analysis Type**: Gap Analysis / Code Quality / Performance Analysis
|
||
>
|
||
> **Project**: {project}
|
||
> **Version**: {version}
|
||
> **Analyst**: {author}
|
||
> **Date**: {date}
|
||
> **Design Doc**: [{feature}.design.md](../02-design/features/{feature}.design.md)
|
||
|
||
### Pipeline References (for verification)
|
||
|
||
| Phase | Document | Verification Target |
|
||
|-------|----------|---------------------|
|
||
| Phase 1 | [Schema](../01-plan/schema.md) | Terminology consistency |
|
||
| Phase 2 | [Conventions](../01-plan/conventions.md) | Convention compliance |
|
||
| Phase 4 | [API Spec](../02-design/api/{feature}.md) | API implementation match |
|
||
| Phase 8 | [Review Checklist](./phase-8-review.md) | Architecture/Convention review |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Context Anchor
|
||
|
||
> Carried from Plan → Design → Analysis. Verify implementation against strategic intent.
|
||
|
||
| Key | Value |
|
||
|-----|-------|
|
||
| **WHY** | {copied from Design Context Anchor} |
|
||
| **WHO** | {copied from Design Context Anchor} |
|
||
| **RISK** | {copied from Design Context Anchor} |
|
||
| **SUCCESS** | {copied from Design Context Anchor} |
|
||
| **SCOPE** | {copied from Design Context Anchor} |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Strategic Alignment Check
|
||
|
||
> Verifies implementation against the full upstream chain: PRD → Plan → Design.
|
||
|
||
### PRD Alignment
|
||
|
||
| PRD Element | Expected | Implementation Status |
|
||
|-------------|----------|:---------------------:|
|
||
| Core Problem (WHY) | {from PRD} | ✅ Addressed / ❌ Missed |
|
||
| Target User (WHO) | {from PRD} | ✅ Addressed / ❌ Missed |
|
||
| Value Proposition | {from PRD} | ✅ Delivered / ⚠️ Partial |
|
||
|
||
### Success Criteria Status
|
||
|
||
| # | Criteria (from Plan) | Status | Evidence |
|
||
|---|---------------------|:------:|----------|
|
||
| SC-1 | {criteria text} | ✅/⚠️/❌ | {file:line or test result} |
|
||
| SC-2 | {criteria text} | ✅/⚠️/❌ | {file:line or test result} |
|
||
|
||
**Success Rate**: {X}/{Y} criteria met
|
||
|
||
### Decision Record Verification
|
||
|
||
| Source | Decision | Followed? | Deviation |
|
||
|--------|----------|:---------:|-----------|
|
||
| [PRD] | {decision} | ✅/❌ | {deviation if any} |
|
||
| [Plan] | {decision} | ✅/❌ | {deviation if any} |
|
||
| [Design] | {decision} | ✅/❌ | {deviation if any} |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Analysis Overview
|
||
|
||
### 1.1 Analysis Purpose
|
||
|
||
{Purpose of conducting this analysis}
|
||
|
||
### 1.2 Analysis Scope
|
||
|
||
- **Design Document**: `docs/02-design/features/{feature}.design.md`
|
||
- **Implementation Path**: `src/features/{feature}/`
|
||
- **Analysis Date**: {date}
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2. Gap Analysis (Design vs Implementation)
|
||
|
||
### 2.1 API Endpoints
|
||
|
||
| Design | Implementation | Status | Notes |
|
||
|--------|---------------|--------|-------|
|
||
| POST /api/{resource} | POST /api/{resource} | ✅ Match | |
|
||
| GET /api/{resource}/:id | GET /api/{resource}/:id | ✅ Match | |
|
||
| - | POST /api/{resource}/bulk | ⚠️ Missing in design | Added in impl |
|
||
| DELETE /api/{resource}/:id | - | ❌ Not implemented | Needs impl |
|
||
|
||
### 2.2 Data Model
|
||
|
||
| Field | Design Type | Impl Type | Status |
|
||
|-------|-------------|-----------|--------|
|
||
| id | string | string | ✅ |
|
||
| email | string | string | ✅ |
|
||
| createdAt | Date | Date | ✅ |
|
||
| metadata | - | object | ⚠️ Missing in design |
|
||
|
||
### 2.3 Component Structure
|
||
|
||
| Design Component | Implementation File | Status |
|
||
|------------------|---------------------|--------|
|
||
| {ComponentA} | src/components/{ComponentA}.tsx | ✅ Match |
|
||
| {ComponentB} | - | ❌ Not implemented |
|
||
|
||
### 2.4 Functional Depth Analysis (v2.1.0)
|
||
|
||
> Measures actual implementation completeness, not just file existence.
|
||
|
||
| File | Depth Score | Placeholder Indicators | Missing Design Elements |
|
||
|------|:----------:|----------------------|------------------------|
|
||
| {file} | {0-100} | {indicators found} | {missing elements from Page UI Checklist} |
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Scoring: 0=empty, 20=skeleton, 40=mock data, 60=partial logic, 80=mostly complete, 100=fully implemented
|
||
Threshold: Files scoring <60 are flagged as "SHALLOW"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Shallow File Count**: {N} / {total} files ({percent}%)
|
||
|
||
### 2.5 Page UI Checklist Verification (v2.1.0)
|
||
|
||
> Cross-references Design document §5.4 Page UI Checklist against implementation.
|
||
|
||
| Page | Design Elements | Implemented | Missing | Rate |
|
||
|------|:--------------:|:-----------:|:-------:|:----:|
|
||
| {page} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {percent}% |
|
||
|
||
**Functional Match Rate**: {percent}%
|
||
|
||
### 2.6 API Contract Verification (v2.2.0)
|
||
|
||
> 3-way cross-reference: Design §4 ↔ Server (route.ts) ↔ Client (fetch calls)
|
||
> Detects runtime failures that structural/functional checks miss.
|
||
|
||
| # | Endpoint | Design | Server | Client | Contract |
|
||
|---|----------|:------:|:------:|:------:|:--------:|
|
||
| {N} | {endpoint} | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | PASS/FAIL |
|
||
|
||
**Contract Failures:**
|
||
|
||
| Endpoint | Layer | Issue | Fix Required |
|
||
|----------|-------|-------|-------------|
|
||
| {endpoint} | {Server/Client} | {mismatch description} | {fix} |
|
||
|
||
**Contract Match Rate**: {M}/{N} endpoints = {percent}%
|
||
|
||
### 2.7 Runtime Verification Results (v2.3.0)
|
||
|
||
> Actual execution results — not code reading, real HTTP calls and browser tests.
|
||
|
||
#### L1: API Endpoint Tests (curl)
|
||
|
||
| # | Test | Status | Expected | Actual | Pass |
|
||
|---|------|:------:|----------|--------|:----:|
|
||
| {N} | {description} | {status code} | {expected} | {actual response} | ✅/❌ |
|
||
|
||
**L1 Score**: {pass}/{total} = {percent}%
|
||
|
||
#### L2: UI Action Tests (Playwright)
|
||
|
||
| # | Page | Action | Expected Result | Pass |
|
||
|---|------|--------|----------------|:----:|
|
||
| {N} | {page} | {action} | {result} | ✅/❌ |
|
||
|
||
**L2 Score**: {pass}/{total} = {percent}%
|
||
|
||
#### L3: E2E Scenario Tests (Playwright)
|
||
|
||
| # | Scenario | Steps | Result | Pass |
|
||
|---|----------|:-----:|--------|:----:|
|
||
| {N} | {scenario name} | {step count} | {pass/fail + details} | ✅/❌ |
|
||
|
||
**L3 Score**: {pass}/{total} = {percent}%
|
||
|
||
**Runtime Match Rate**: (L1 × 0.4 + L2 × 0.3 + L3 × 0.3) = {percent}%
|
||
|
||
### 2.8 Match Rate Summary
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Structural Match Rate: {percent}% │
|
||
│ Functional Match Rate: {percent}% │
|
||
│ Contract Match Rate: {percent}% │
|
||
│ Runtime Match Rate: {percent}% (NEW) │
|
||
│ ─────────────────────────────────────────── │
|
||
│ Overall Match Rate: {percent}% │
|
||
│ = (Structural × 0.15) + (Functional × 0.25)│
|
||
│ + (Contract × 0.25) + (Runtime × 0.35) │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ ✅ Match: {N} items ({percent}%) │
|
||
│ ⚠️ Shallow: {N} items ({percent}%) │
|
||
│ ❌ Not implemented: {N} items ({percent}%) │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3. Code Quality Analysis
|
||
|
||
### 3.1 Complexity Analysis
|
||
|
||
| File | Function | Complexity | Status | Recommendation |
|
||
|------|----------|------------|--------|----------------|
|
||
| {service}.ts | processData | 15 | ⚠️ High | Split function |
|
||
| utils.ts | formatDate | 3 | ✅ Good | - |
|
||
|
||
### 3.2 Code Smells
|
||
|
||
| Type | File | Location | Description | Severity |
|
||
|------|------|----------|-------------|----------|
|
||
| Long function | api.ts | L45-120 | 75 lines (recommended: <50) | 🟡 |
|
||
| Duplicate code | helpers.ts | L10, L45 | Same logic repeated | 🟡 |
|
||
| Magic number | config.ts | L23 | Hardcoded number | 🟢 |
|
||
|
||
### 3.3 Security Issues
|
||
|
||
| Severity | File | Location | Issue | Recommendation |
|
||
|----------|------|----------|-------|----------------|
|
||
| 🔴 Critical | auth.ts | L42 | Hardcoded secret | Move to env var |
|
||
| 🟡 Warning | api.ts | L15 | Missing input validation | Add validation |
|
||
| 🟢 Info | - | - | - | - |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4. Performance Analysis (if applicable)
|
||
|
||
### 4.1 Response Time
|
||
|
||
| Endpoint | Measured | Target | Status |
|
||
|----------|----------|--------|--------|
|
||
| GET /api/{resource} | 150ms | 200ms | ✅ |
|
||
| POST /api/{resource} | 350ms | 200ms | ❌ |
|
||
|
||
### 4.2 Bottlenecks
|
||
|
||
| Location | Problem | Impact | Recommendation |
|
||
|----------|---------|--------|----------------|
|
||
| Repository.findAll() | N+1 query | Increased response time | Eager Loading |
|
||
| ImageProcessor | Sync processing | Blocking | Async processing |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5. Test Coverage
|
||
|
||
### 5.1 Coverage Status
|
||
|
||
| Area | Current | Target | Status |
|
||
|------|---------|--------|--------|
|
||
| Statements | 72% | 80% | ❌ |
|
||
| Branches | 65% | 75% | ❌ |
|
||
| Functions | 80% | 80% | ✅ |
|
||
| Lines | 73% | 80% | ❌ |
|
||
|
||
### 5.2 Uncovered Areas
|
||
|
||
- `src/features/{feature}/handlers/errorHandler.ts`
|
||
- `src/features/{feature}/utils/parser.ts`
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6. Clean Architecture Compliance
|
||
|
||
> Reference: `docs/02-design/{feature}.design.md` Section 9 (Clean Architecture)
|
||
|
||
### 6.1 Layer Dependency Verification
|
||
|
||
| Layer | Expected Dependencies | Actual Dependencies | Status |
|
||
|-------|----------------------|---------------------|--------|
|
||
| Presentation | Application, Domain | {actual imports} | ✅/❌ |
|
||
| Application | Domain, Infrastructure | {actual imports} | ✅/❌ |
|
||
| Domain | None (independent) | {actual imports} | ✅/❌ |
|
||
| Infrastructure | Domain only | {actual imports} | ✅/❌ |
|
||
|
||
### 6.2 Dependency Violations
|
||
|
||
| File | Layer | Violation | Recommendation |
|
||
|------|-------|-----------|----------------|
|
||
| `components/UserList.tsx` | Presentation | Imports `@/lib/api` directly | Use service hook instead |
|
||
| `services/user.ts` | Application | Imports `@/components/Button` | Remove UI dependency |
|
||
| - | - | - | - |
|
||
|
||
### 6.3 Layer Assignment Verification
|
||
|
||
| Component | Designed Layer | Actual Location | Status |
|
||
|-----------|---------------|-----------------|--------|
|
||
| {ComponentA} | Presentation | `src/components/{feature}/` | ✅ |
|
||
| {ServiceA} | Application | `src/services/{feature}.ts` | ✅ |
|
||
| {TypeA} | Domain | `src/types/{feature}.ts` | ✅ |
|
||
| {ApiClient} | Infrastructure | `src/lib/api/{feature}.ts` | ✅ |
|
||
|
||
### 6.4 Architecture Score
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Architecture Compliance: 85% │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ ✅ Correct layer placement: 17/20 files │
|
||
│ ⚠️ Dependency violations: 2 files │
|
||
│ ❌ Wrong layer: 1 file │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7. Convention Compliance
|
||
|
||
> Reference: `docs/01-plan/conventions.md` or Phase 2 Pipeline output
|
||
|
||
### 7.1 Naming Convention Check
|
||
|
||
| Category | Convention | Files Checked | Compliance | Violations |
|
||
|----------|-----------|:-------------:|:----------:|------------|
|
||
| Components | PascalCase | 15 | 100% | - |
|
||
| Functions | camelCase | 42 | 98% | `GetUser` → `getUser` |
|
||
| Constants | UPPER_SNAKE_CASE | 8 | 100% | - |
|
||
| Files (component) | PascalCase.tsx | 15 | 93% | `userProfile.tsx` → `UserProfile.tsx` |
|
||
| Files (utility) | camelCase.ts | 12 | 100% | - |
|
||
| Folders | kebab-case | 10 | 90% | `userProfile/` → `user-profile/` |
|
||
|
||
### 7.2 Folder Structure Check
|
||
|
||
| Expected Path | Exists | Contents Correct | Notes |
|
||
|---------------|:------:|:----------------:|-------|
|
||
| `src/components/` | ✅ | ✅ | |
|
||
| `src/features/{feature}/` | ✅ | ✅ | |
|
||
| `src/services/` | ✅ | ⚠️ | Some services in features/ |
|
||
| `src/types/` | ✅ | ✅ | |
|
||
| `src/lib/` | ✅ | ✅ | |
|
||
|
||
### 7.3 Import Order Check
|
||
|
||
- [x] External libraries first
|
||
- [x] Internal absolute imports second (`@/...`)
|
||
- [ ] Relative imports third (`./...`)
|
||
- [x] Type imports fourth (`import type`)
|
||
- [x] Styles last
|
||
|
||
**Violations Found:**
|
||
| File | Issue | Line |
|
||
|------|-------|------|
|
||
| `components/Header.tsx` | Type import before relative import | L5-6 |
|
||
|
||
### 7.4 Environment Variable Check
|
||
|
||
| Variable | Convention | Actual | Status |
|
||
|----------|-----------|--------|--------|
|
||
| API URL | `NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL` | `NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL` | ✅ |
|
||
| DB Host | `DB_HOST` | `DATABASE_HOST` | ⚠️ Non-standard |
|
||
| Auth Secret | `AUTH_SECRET` | `AUTH_SECRET` | ✅ |
|
||
|
||
### 7.5 Convention Score
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Convention Compliance: 92% │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ Naming: 95% │
|
||
│ Folder Structure: 90% │
|
||
│ Import Order: 88% │
|
||
│ Env Variables: 95% │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 8. Overall Score
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Overall Score: 78/100 │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ Design Match: 75 points │
|
||
│ Code Quality: 70 points │
|
||
│ Security: 65 points │
|
||
│ Testing: 70 points │
|
||
│ Performance: 80 points │
|
||
│ Architecture: 85 points (New) │
|
||
│ Convention: 92 points (New) │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 9. Recommended Actions
|
||
|
||
### 9.1 Immediate (within 24 hours)
|
||
|
||
| Priority | Item | File | Assignee |
|
||
|----------|------|------|----------|
|
||
| 🔴 1 | Remove hardcoded secret | auth.ts:42 | - |
|
||
| 🔴 2 | Add input validation | api.ts:15 | - |
|
||
|
||
### 9.2 Short-term (within 1 week)
|
||
|
||
| Priority | Item | File | Expected Impact |
|
||
|----------|------|------|-----------------|
|
||
| 🟡 1 | Fix N+1 query | repository.ts | 60% response time reduction |
|
||
| 🟡 2 | Split function | service.ts | Improved maintainability |
|
||
|
||
### 9.3 Long-term (backlog)
|
||
|
||
| Item | File | Notes |
|
||
|------|------|-------|
|
||
| Refactoring | utils/ | Clean up duplicate code |
|
||
| Documentation | - | Add JSDoc |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10. Design Document Updates Needed
|
||
|
||
The following items require design document updates to match implementation:
|
||
|
||
- [ ] Add POST /api/{resource}/bulk endpoint
|
||
- [ ] Add metadata field to data model
|
||
- [ ] Update error code list
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11. Next Steps
|
||
|
||
- [ ] Fix Critical issues
|
||
- [ ] Update design document
|
||
- [ ] Write completion report (`{feature}.report.md`)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Version History
|
||
|
||
| Version | Date | Changes | Author |
|
||
|---------|------|---------|--------|
|
||
| 0.1 | {date} | Initial analysis | {author} |
|