[Claude #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-87
Round #1 after Stage 4 rewind (Codex #1 verify FAIL — stale IMP-85 smoke parametrize). Stage 1 anchor SHA: c53722ad. Scope = honesty defect…
[Codex #1] Stage 4 test-verify - IMP-87
Stage 4 result: FAIL.
The targeted IMP-87 and IMP-30 suites pass, and the implementation diff matches the Stage 2 direction for u1-u4 in the intended…
[Claude #1] Stage 4 test-verify — IMP-87
TL;DR
Targeted suites (u4 + u5) pass. Implementation u1+u2+u3 in src/phase_z2_pipeline.py matches Stage 2 contract end-to-end (real `compute_slide_s…
[Codex #5] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-87
Verified the single executed unit u5 against the Stage 2 contract.
Decision: u5 is correct. The new regression file exercises the real…
[Claude #5] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-87
Executing unit: u5
=== UNIT DELIVERABLE ===
unit_executed: u5
unit_summary (from Stage 2 plan):
Add IMP-87 honesty regressions for Case B…
[Codex #4] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-87
Verified the single executed unit u4 against the Stage 2 contract.
Decision: u4 is correct. The implementation inverts the two stale IMP-30…
[Claude #4] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-87
Executing unit: u4
=== UNIT DELIVERABLE ===
unit_executed: u4
unit_summary (from Stage 2 plan):
Invert two stale IMP-30 assertions that encode…
[Codex #3] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-87
Verified the single executed unit u3 against the Stage 2 contract.
Decision: u3 is correct. The implementation maps EMPTY_SHELL_NO_CONTENT to…
[Claude #3] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-87
Executing unit: u3
=== UNIT DELIVERABLE ===
unit_executed: u3
unit_summary (from Stage 2 plan):
Add CLI/report handling so EMPTY_SHELL_NO_CONTE…
[Codex #2] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-87
Verified the single executed unit u2 against the Stage 2 contract.
Decision: u2 is correct. The implementation adds the explicit `EMPTY_SHELL_NO…
[Claude #2] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-87
Executing unit: u2
=== UNIT DELIVERABLE ===
unit_executed: u2
unit_summary (from Stage 2 plan):
Add EMPTY_SHELL_NO_CONTENT before the existing…
[Codex #1] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-87
Verified the single executed unit u1 against the Stage 2 contract.
Decision: u1 is correct. The implementation adds _is_empty_shell_unit()…
[Claude #1] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-87
Executing unit: u1
=== UNIT DELIVERABLE ===
unit_executed: u1
unit_summary (from Stage 2 plan):
Add empty-shell unit detection and redefine…
[Codex #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-87
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === units:
- id: u1 verdict: complete summary: Add empty-shell unit detection and redefine full_mdx_coverage…
[Claude #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-87
Round #2 lock. Codex #1 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES with per-unit verdict=complete on all 5 units. No deltas — units / files / line budgets unchanged.…
⚠️ [Orchestrator] Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES rejected: unit with tests: [] (forbidden — implementation + tests = same unit).
Requirements (strict):
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===…
[Codex #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-87
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === units:
- id: u1 verdict: complete summary: Add empty-shell unit detection and make full_mdx_coverage…
[Claude #1] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-87
Locus: compute_slide_status (src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2939-3130) + CLI tail
(L6011-6072). Defect = empty_shell-dominant slide reports overall=PASS…
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review - IMP-87
Verdict: I agree with the Stage 1 correction, with one scope lock.
The issue body's mdx05 evidence is not an "all rank-1 candidates are reject" case.…
[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-87
TL;DR
- The evidence cited in the issue body (mdx05 fresh validation 2026-05-22) does NOT match the proposed defect class. mdx05 is **Case B (no…