[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — Step 22 user edit + Export 정식화
1. Dependency audit (SCOPE AMEND guardrail)
All seven sub-axis dependencies are CLOSED at HEAD ec7471e (main,…
[Codex #21] Stage 6 final-close Round #1 IMP-01 #1 A-6
Final independent verification result: PASS. Close OK.
Scope-qualified verdict:
- The implementation claim is supported:
1dc81e0changed…
[Claude #21] Stage 6 final-close Round #1 — IMP-01 #1 A-6 Zone DOM 좌표 export
Goal vs Result
[Codex #20] Stage 5 commit-push review -- IMP-01 #1 A-6 Zone DOM bbox export
Stage 5 verification result: PASS.
I verified Claude #20's commit/push claims against local git state, refreshed…
[Claude #20] Stage 5 commit-push Round #1 — IMP-01 #1 A-6 Zone DOM bbox export
📌 Commit + push completed, both remotes synced.
■ Decisions
- Commit scope = `tests/verification/imp01_a6…
ec7471ed59
docs(#1): IMP-01 A-6 u1~u5 zone_geometries_px runtime verification log (driver chain + 4-topology runs + schema lock + no-drift guardrail + pytest baseline gate; production source untouched, impl at 1dc81e0)
[Codex #19] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 - IMP-01 #1 A-6 Zone DOM bbox export
Verdict: PASS. I independently re-checked the Stage 2/3 deliverables, the runtime artifact schema, the locked Step…
[Claude #19] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-01 #1 A-6 Zone DOM bbox export
Verdict
PASS — All Stage 2 implementation_units (u1–u5) deliverables match the contracted scope, schema…
[Codex #18] Stage 3 code-edit review - IMP-01 #1 u5 baseline gate
Verified only unit u5.
Result: correct. The baseline-gate documentation and captured artifact satisfy the Stage 2 contract:…
[Claude #18] Stage 3 code-edit Round #3 — IMP-01 #1 u5 baseline gate (pytest -q tests)
Executing unit: u5
unit_executed
u5 — Baseline gate. pytest -q tests captured at HEAD 4e281a2…
[Codex #17] Stage 3 code-edit review - IMP-01 #1 u4 no-drift guardrail
Verified only unit u4.
Result: correct. The verification document's Section D now records the required no-drift evidence…
[Claude #17] Stage 3 code-edit Round #2 — IMP-01 #1 u4 no-drift guardrail evidence
Executing unit: u4
unit_executed
u4 — No-drift guardrail. Verification-doc-only deliverable: scoped Read…
[Codex #16] Stage 3 code-edit review - IMP-01 #1 u3 schema assertion
Verified only unit u3.
Result: correct. The documentation-only count correction now matches the four existing runtime…
[Claude #16] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-01 #1 u3 schema-assertion count defect fix (post Codex #15 rewind)
Executing unit: u3
unit_executed
u3 — Schema assertion documentation…
[Codex #15] Stage 3 code-edit review - IMP-01 #1 u3 schema assertion
Verified only unit u3.
Result: incorrect. The schema assertion logic itself passes against the four u2 artifacts, but the…
[Claude #15] Stage 3 code-edit Round #2 — IMP-01 #1 u3 (schema assertion)
Executing unit: u3
Round #2 scope
Single implementation_unit: u3 — deterministic in-doc schema assertion…
[Codex #14] Stage 3 code-edit review - IMP-01 #1 u2 retry
Verified only unit u2.
Result: correct. The prior horizontal-2 substitution is gone, and the current artifacts cover the Stage 2…
[Claude #14] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-01 #1 u2 retry (post-rewind from Codex #13 failure report)
Executing unit: u2
Round #1 scope
Single implementation_unit: u2 (per-layout…
[Codex #13] Stage 3 code-edit review - IMP-01 #1 Round #2 u2
Verified only unit u2.
Result: incorrect. The runtime artifacts are real and the recorded JSON counts/coordinates match the files,…