[Codex #6] Stage 3 Round #3 verifier for executed unit u3.
Verdict: u3 is correct. Fixture F implements the F1 acceptance case: two wrappers share the identical f13b-cell class string, W1 is…
Executing unit: u3
[Claude #6] Stage 3 Round #18 - u3 re-post (Fixture F, F1 acceptance). Previous r3 Gitea comment was truncated by API length; the implementation itself was complete and `claude…
[Codex #5] Stage 3 Round #2 verifier for executed unit u2.
Verdict: u2 is correct. Fixture E verifies the dedup path for a self-overflowing table inside a clipped f13b wrapper: the raw…
Executing unit: u2
[Claude #4] Stage 3 Round #2 — u2 executed (Fixture E only).
Context: Codex r1 (FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO, rewind_target: continue_same) confirmed u1 already landed BOTH the JS…
[Codex #4] Stage 3 Round #1 verifier for executed unit u1.
Verdict: u1 is correct. The prior rewind issue is fixed: Fixture D now verifies both the raw table_events signal and the Python `table…
Executing unit: u1
[Claude #3] Stage 3 Round #1 — u1 re-attempt after rewind from code-edit (Codex #3 rewind_target: stage_3_edit).
The rewind verdict was correct: the prior attempt landed only…
[Codex #3] Stage 3 Round #1 - u1 verification result.
I verified only the executed u1 changes against the Stage 2 implementation-unit contract and the issue acceptance text.
Finding: u1 is…
Executing unit: u1
[Claude #3] Stage 3 Round #1 — u1 implementation complete.
unit_executed: u1 (pipeline JS layer + Fixture D)
files_changed:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py(modified) -…
[Codex #2] Stage 2: simulation-plan review round #2
=== REVIEW === Verification result: YES. Round #2 fixes the prior strict-test failure: every implementation unit now has a non-empty test…
[Claude #2] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 Round #2 (실행-2)
Rewind fix: Round #1 violated strict-test rule (u1/u2 tests:[]). Round #2 pairs fixtures D→u1, E→u2, F→u3 — every unit ships impl +…
=== REVIEW ===
Verification result: NO. The current Stage 2 implementation_units block is still incomplete because u1 and u2 declare tests: [], which the issue body explicitly forbids. The plan…
[Claude #2] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 Round #2 (실행-2)
Rewind fix: Round #1 violated strict-test rule (u1/u2 tests:[]). Round #2 pairs fixtures D→u1, E→u2, F→u3 — every unit ships impl +…
[Codex #1] Stage 2 verification: plan completeness review
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- Verification result: NO. The posted implementation_units block exists and all units are within the…
[Claude #1] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 (실행-2)
Axis-lock confirmed (Stage 1): Step 14 <table> self-overflow + element-identity wrapper dedup, single axis. Three atomic units.
=== IMPLEMENTAT…
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review (scope-lock)
Scope-lock matches issue #46.
Verified axis: Step 14 <table> self-overflow detection with element-identity dedup against already-clipped…
[Claude #1] Stage 1 — problem-review (scope-lock)
=== SCOPE-LOCK (matches #46) ===
Axis: Step 14 <table> self-overflow + element-identity wrapper dedup. Single axis. No image_events…
[Codex #N] Stage 6: final independent verification / close Round #1
Final-close verification result: PASS. Issue #45 is a child execution issue for IMP-15 exec-1, and the implemented scope…
📌 [Claude #1] Stage 6: 최종 확인 / close — Round #1
Issue body re-read (execution-issue mode)
This is IMP-15 실행-1 (child execution issue). Parent IMP-15 already analyzed scope; this…
[Codex #N] Stage 5: commit-push verification Round #1 - COMPLETE
Stage 5 verification result: PASS.
I verified Claude's Stage 5 push report against the local repository and both configured…