[Codex #12] Stage 4 Test / Verify Round #1 (IMP-17 carve-out)
Verification scope
Verified the Stage 3 IMP-17 units only:
- u1 route-hint comment correction and anchor test.
- u2 carve-out…
[Claude #11] Stage 4 — Test / Verify Round #1 (IMP-17 carve-out anchor + docs)
Verification scope
Stage 3 landed 4 atomic units (u1 comment + anchor test, u2 carve-out doc, u3 backlog row,…
[Codex #7]
Stage 3 Round #4 verification for unit u4 only.
Verdict: u4 is correct and scope-locked. The INSIGHT-MAP axis registry row now has the IMP-17 prefix and links to the carve-out…
Executing unit: u4
[Claude #10] Stage 3 Round #4 — unit u4 (22-step map registry row prefix).
unit_executed: u4
files_changed:
docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md(1…
[Codex #6]
Stage 3 Round #3 verification for unit u3 only.
Verdict: u3 is correct and scope-locked. The IMP-17 backlog row now links to the carve-out boundary document and carries only a short…
Executing unit: u3
[Claude #8] Stage 3 Round #3 — unit u3 (backlog row carve-out link + activation gate pointer).
unit_executed: u3
files_changed:
- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENT…
[Codex #5]
Stage 3 Round #2 verification for unit u2 only.
Verdict: u2 is correct and scope-locked. The new carve-out document defines the AI fallback-only boundary, activation gate, pattern…
Executing unit: u2
[Claude #6] Stage 3 Round #2 — unit u2 (carve-out design doc).
unit_executed: u2
files_changed:
docs/architecture/IMP-17-CARVE-OUT.md(new file, 44 lines)
**diff…
[Codex #4]
Stage 3 Round #1 verification for unit u1 only.
Verdict: u1 is correct and scope-locked. The route-hint comment now references IMP-17 instead of the non-existent IMP-31, the adjacent…
Executing unit: u1
[Claude #4] Stage 3 Round #1 — unit u1 (comment anchor correction).
unit_executed: u1
files_changed:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py(1 line modified, line 564) -…
[Codex #3] Stage 2 plan verification R2
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- id: u1 summary: Correct src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:564 route-hint comment from non-existent IMP-31 to IMP-17, preserving AI…
[Claude #3] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R2 (consensus lock)
R1 Claude + R1 Codex proposed identical 4-unit decomposition. R2 = lock plan, no drift.
Axis Coverage Checklist
⚠️ [Orchestrator] Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES rejected: unit with tests: [] (forbidden — implementation + tests = same unit).
Requirements (strict):
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===…
[Codex #2] Stage 2 plan verification
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- id: u1
summary: Correct the
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:564route-hint comment from the non-existent IMP-31 forward reference…
[Claude #2] Stage 2 — Simulation Plan R1
Axis Coverage Checklist
[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem review for IMP-17
Verdict: Claude #1's root-cause framing is materially correct, with two scope-lock corrections that should be carried into Stage 2.
Root cause /…
[Claude #1] Stage 1 — IMP-17 problem review (AI repair fallback infra carve-out)
Root-cause framing
IMP-17 is a carve-out axis — explicitly flagged "normal path 밖 (AI fallback only)"…
[Codex #29] Stage 6 final-close Round #1 independent verification for IMP-16.
Decision: PASS / close OK, with dependency note.
I verified the Stage 5 commit, remote state, committed file scope,…
[Claude #6] Stage 6 — final-close Round #1 for IMP-16.
1. Issue body re-read (binding scope)
- Issue #16 = IMP-16 B-2 verification helper axis (Step 1/2/14/21/22 helper layer).
- `hard link:…