[Claude #23] Stage 3 code-edit Round #5 — IMP-94 u5
Executing unit: u5
📌 unit_executed: u5 — Test passthrough, idempotence, F29 injection, and all 13 root anchors.
📌 files_changed:…
[Codex #22] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #4 - IMP-94 u4
Verified only the executed unit: u4.
Decision: correct for the u4 contract. The implementation adds explicit `"placement_markers"…
[Claude #22] Stage 3 code-edit Round #4 — IMP-94 u4
Executing unit: u4
📌 unit_executed: u4 — Add placement_markers: [] to five non-live zones_data.append paths in `src/phase_z2_pipel…
[Codex #21] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #3 - IMP-94 u3
Verified only the executed unit: u3.
Decision: correct for the u3 contract. The implementation adds a deterministic `_derive_plac…
[Claude #21] Stage 3 code-edit Round #3 — IMP-94 u3
Executing unit: u3
📌 unit_executed: u3 — Project live B4 PlacementPlan.slot_assignments to marker dicts.
📌 files_changed: -…
[Codex #20] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #2 - IMP-94 u2
Verified only the executed unit: u2.
Decision: correct for the u2 contract. The pipeline now imports the u1 region/content…
[Claude #20] Stage 3 code-edit Round #2 — IMP-94 u2
Executing unit: u2
📌 unit_executed: u2 — Chain stamper after src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:3634 with marker-list fallback.
📌…
[Codex #19] Stage 3 code-edit verification Round #1 - IMP-94 u1
Verified only the executed unit: u1.
Decision: correct for the u1 contract. The implementation adds a deterministic `src.region_m…
[Claude #19] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-94 u1
Executing unit: u1
📌 unit_executed: u1 — Add deterministic region/content root-div stamper; empty/None passthrough; idempotent.
📌…
[Codex #18] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-94 R2
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- id: u1 summary: Add deterministic region/content root-div stamper; empty/None passthrough; idempotent. …
[Claude #18] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-94 R2 (untruncated re-statement of R1-approved design)
R1 ([Claude #17]) was truncated mid-u6; [Codex #17] verified the design YES. R2 = same six-unit…
⚠️ [Orchestrator] Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES rejected: no - id: u<N> entry.
Requirements (strict):
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===block with at least one- id: u<N>entry- Each unit…
[Codex #17] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-94 R1 retry
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === Verification result: YES.
R1 resolves the Codex #16 blocker. The plan no longer indexes through…
[Claude #17] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-94 R1 retry (absent placement_plan fallback LOCKED)
Codex R0 blocker resolved. Pivot from Jinja-kwarg + per-partial edit to post-render code-side…
[Codex #16] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-94 R1 retry
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === Verification result: NO.
Blocking issue: u2 and u3 are internally inconsistent on the absent-placement-pl…
[Claude #16] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-94 R1 (Codex #15 fix: parity test in u4-u10 files[])
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- {id: u1, summary: "94_design_lock R3 (anchors L667/670/691/700/701;…
[Codex #15] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-94 R1 retry
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === Verification result: NO.
The implementation_units block exists and all listed units have non-empty tests…
[Claude #14] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-94 R1 retry
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- {id: u1, summary: "94_design_lock.md R2 (anchors L667/670/691/700/701; 6 emit sites L6486/6693/6732/6790/6890…
[Codex #13] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-94 Round #1
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS === Verification result: NO.
The proposed implementation_units block exists, and the prompt-visible units…
[Claude #9] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-94 Round #5
=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===
- {id: u1, summary: "94_design_lock.md (SPEC anchors L667/L670/L691/L700/L701; 6 zones_data sites L6486/L6693/L6…