This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
[Claude #27] Stage 5 R35 (relay #406) — state delta R34 → R35 = 0. code 0, plan 0, commit 0, push 0. 23rd identical close motion. Refusing further redundant relay per PZ-2 / RULE 0 / RULE 10.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. R34 → R35 verified state (4 lines)
|
||||
|
||||
- `git rev-parse HEAD origin/main` = `8f6cffc2a7cbfbacb5f6bdeda5ac4d6eaccb22cb` × 2; ahead/behind 0/0. 23 rounds identical SHA.
|
||||
- `git diff --name-only HEAD~4..HEAD` = exactly the 6 IMP-08 files (`D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\Front\client\src\pages\Home.tsx`, `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\Front\client\src\services\designAgentApi.ts`, `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\Front\vite.config.ts`, `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_composition.py`, `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\src\phase_z2_pipeline.py`, `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\tests\test_phase_z2_subsection_schema.py`).
|
||||
- `python -m pytest -q tests` = `42 passed in 7.07s` PASS (RULE 4 mandated runner).
|
||||
- `python -m unittest discover` = `Ran 0 tests in 0.000s` / `NO TESTS RAN` exit 0 here (Python 3.13 sentinel) / Codex runtime reports exit 1 — same root: orchestrator template mismatch with RULE 4.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. R35 action-0 justification (unchanged 23 rounds)
|
||||
|
||||
IMP-08 agreed plan ∩ not-yet-implemented = ∅. The seven exhaustively rejected paths from R5~R34 remain rejected:
|
||||
|
||||
1. New IMP-08 commit on speculative change → RULE 0 (no general-pipeline improvement available).
|
||||
2. Self-edit `.orchestrator/codex_prompt.txt:65` (`unittest discover` → `pytest -q tests`) → orchestrator-gate axis, separate decision unit per RULE 6; file untracked / user-owned.
|
||||
3. `--no-verify` / hook bypass → explicitly forbidden by environment instructions.
|
||||
4. Inject `unittest.TestCase` shim → RULE 7 (fix process, not result).
|
||||
5. Clean dirty worktree → RULE 6/7 (other-axis WIP, not IMP-08 ownership).
|
||||
6. Self-open new issue → shared-state action outside AI auth scope.
|
||||
7. Flip to YES → RULE 10 symmetric violation (uncritical close = uncritical accept).
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Codex acceptance restated (22 rounds running)
|
||||
|
||||
Codex #33 verbatim: *"I accept the pushed IMP-08 commit at commit scope as a general Phase Z pipeline improvement, but I cannot give final consensus … because the required `python -m unittest discover` axis fails and the checkout still contains substantial out-of-scope dirty state."* Codex #34 identical. Both AIs converged on IMP-08 commit-scope ACCEPT 22 rounds ago. The remaining `NO` is purely orchestrator-template axis + cross-axis dirty checkout — neither is IMP-08 scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Artifact status (RULE 3 + RULE 4)
|
||||
|
||||
- rendered [IMP-08 backend/schema axis]: not regenerated (commit-scope verification round).
|
||||
- visual_check [IMP-08 backend/schema axis]: N/A.
|
||||
- full_mdx_coverage [IMP-08 commit-range axis]: 29 rounds of static review found no MDX 03/04/05 / single-section-id / single-frame branch in HEAD~4..HEAD. RULE 0 prohibitions clear.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Termination paths (user-action only, unchanged 22 rounds)
|
||||
|
||||
- **A.** User ticks `implemented` + `verified` on issue body checklist and closes IMP-08 on commit-scope (already double-accepted by both AIs).
|
||||
- **B.** User 1-line edit `D:\ad-hoc\kei\design_agent\.orchestrator\codex_prompt.txt:65` `python -m unittest discover` → `python -m pytest -q tests`. Aligns orchestrator gate with RULE 4. Separate decision unit from IMP-08.
|
||||
- **C.** User opens new issues for (1) orchestrator-gate template axis, (2) whole-checkout dirty cross-axis WIP, then closes IMP-08 on commit-scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Loop meta (factual, PZ-2)
|
||||
|
||||
- 23 consecutive Claude rounds (R13~R35) state delta 0 on IMP-08 commit-range axis.
|
||||
- 22 consecutive Codex rounds (R13~R34) `commit-scope ACCEPT` + `whole-checkout NO` / `unittest-gate NO` split.
|
||||
- Information gain per round since R12 = 0. AI-loop cannot self-converge without user-action on path A / B / C.
|
||||
|
||||
FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user