Files
Pier_v1/.hmcmkit/knowledge/templates/report.template.md
T
ahnyongjooandClaude Sonnet 5.5 964a841de1 chore(rebar): Pier_T_rebar 작업 폴더 초기 구성 및 외부 의존 파일 통합
- Code\rebar_pipeline, review_pipeline, pier-program을 정션에서 실제 폴더로 전환
- Code\rhino_mcp 및 CLAUDE_rhino배경.md 추가, .mcp.json은 PYTHONPATH로 새 위치 사용
- pier-program 내부 .git 제거(이력은 backup\pier-program_20261028.bundle에 보관)
- worktree 가이드 반영(CLAUDE.local.md, HANDOFF.md)
- D:\Rhino-MCP 경로 참조를 새 위치로 치환

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 11:20:18 +09:00

6.4 KiB

template, version, description, variables
template version description variables
report 1.1 PDCA Act phase document template (completion report)
feature
Feature name
date
Creation date (YYYY-MM-DD)
author
Author
project
Project name (from package.json or agents.md)
version
Project version (from package.json)

{feature} Completion Report

Status: Complete / Partial / Cancelled

Project: {project} Version: {version} Author: {author} Completion Date: {date} PDCA Cycle: #{cycle_number}


Executive Summary

1.1 Project Overview

Item Content
Feature {feature}
Start Date {start_date}
End Date {date}
Duration {duration}

1.2 Results Summary

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Completion Rate: 95%                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ✅ Complete:     19 / 20 items              │
│  ⏳ In Progress:   1 / 20 items              │
│  ❌ Cancelled:     0 / 20 items              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

1.3 Value Delivered

Perspective Content
Problem {Core problem that was solved}
Solution {Solution approach that was applied}
Function/UX Effect {Actual achieved functional/UX impact with metrics}
Core Value {Validated core value}

1.4 Success Criteria Final Status

From Plan document — final evaluation of each criterion.

# Criteria Status Evidence
SC-1 {criteria text} ✅ Met {file:line, test result, or metric}
SC-2 {criteria text} ✅ Met {file:line, test result, or metric}

Success Rate: {X}/{Y} criteria met ({percentage}%)

1.5 Decision Record Summary

Key decisions from PRD→Plan→Design chain and their outcomes.

Source Decision Followed? Outcome
[PRD] {decision} ✅ {actual outcome}
[Plan] {decision} ✅ {actual outcome}
[Design] {decision} ✅ {actual outcome}

Phase Document Status
Plan {feature}.plan.md ✅ Finalized
Design {feature}.design.md ✅ Finalized
Check {feature}.analysis.md ✅ Complete
Act Current document 🔄 Writing

3. Completed Items

3.1 Functional Requirements

ID Requirement Status Notes
FR-01 {Requirement 1} ✅ Complete
FR-02 {Requirement 2} ✅ Complete
FR-03 {Requirement 3} ✅ Complete Scope reduced
FR-04 {Requirement 4} ⏳ Next cycle Time constraint

3.2 Non-Functional Requirements

Item Target Achieved Status
Performance < 200ms 150ms ✅
Test Coverage 80% 82% ✅
Accessibility WCAG 2.1 AA AA compliant ✅

3.3 Deliverables

Deliverable Location Status
Components src/features/{feature}/components/ ✅
API src/features/{feature}/api/ ✅
Tests src/features/{feature}/tests/ ✅
Documentation docs/ ✅

4. Incomplete Items

4.1 Carried Over to Next Cycle

Item Reason Priority Estimated Effort
FR-04 Time constraint High 2 days
Performance optimization Out of scope Medium 1 day

4.2 Cancelled/On Hold Items

Item Reason Alternative
- - -

5. Quality Metrics

5.1 Final Analysis Results

Metric Target Final Change
Design Match Rate 90% 95% +20%
Code Quality Score 70 85 +15
Test Coverage 80% 82% +12%
Security Issues 0 Critical 0 ✅

5.2 Resolved Issues

Issue Resolution Result
Hardcoded secret Moved to env var ✅ Resolved
N+1 query Eager Loading ✅ Resolved
Missing input validation Added Zod schema ✅ Resolved

6. Lessons Learned & Retrospective

6.1 What Went Well (Keep)

  • {Positive 1: e.g., Design documentation improved implementation efficiency}
  • {Positive 2: e.g., Early code review caught bugs proactively}
  • {Positive 3}

6.2 What Needs Improvement (Problem)

  • {Improvement 1: e.g., Initial scope estimation was inaccurate}
  • {Improvement 2: e.g., Test cases written too late}
  • {Improvement 3}

6.3 What to Try Next (Try)

  • {Try 1: e.g., Adopt TDD approach}
  • {Try 2: e.g., Smaller PR units}
  • {Try 3}

7. Process Improvement Suggestions

7.1 PDCA Process

Phase Current Improvement Suggestion
Plan Insufficient requirement gathering Add user interviews
Design - -
Do Poor design reference Introduce design checklist
Check Manual analysis Introduce automation tools

7.2 Tools/Environment

Area Improvement Suggestion Expected Benefit
CI/CD Auto deployment Reduced deployment time
Testing Add E2E tests Quality improvement

8. Next Steps

8.1 Immediate

  • Production deployment
  • Monitoring setup
  • User guide creation

8.2 Next PDCA Cycle

Item Priority Expected Start
{Next feature 1} High {date}
{Next feature 2} Medium {date}

9. Changelog

v1.0.0 ({date})

Added:

  • {Added feature 1}
  • {Added feature 2}

Changed:

  • {Changed item}

Fixed:

  • {Fixed bug}

Version History

Version Date Changes Author
1.0 {date} Completion report created {author}