chore(rebar): Pier_T_rebar 작업 폴더 초기 구성 및 외부 의존 파일 통합

- Code\rebar_pipeline, review_pipeline, pier-program을 정션에서 실제 폴더로 전환 - Code\rhino_mcp 및 CLAUDE_rhino배경.md 추가, .mcp.json은 PYTHONPATH로 새 위치 사용 - pier-program 내부 .git 제거(이력은 backup\pier-program_20261028.bundle에 보관) - worktree 가이드 반영(CLAUDE.local.md, HANDOFF.md) - D:\Rhino-MCP 경로 참조를 새 위치로 치환 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-28 11:20:18 +09:00
commit 964a841de1
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+# Code Review Report
+
+> Phase 8 Deliverable: Architecture/Convention review results
+
+**Project**: {{project_name}}
+**Review Date**: {{date}}
+**Reviewer**: {{reviewer}}
+
+---
+
+## 1. Review Scope
+
+- [x] Architecture consistency
+- [x] Convention compliance (Phase 2)
+- [x] API consistency (Phase 4)
+- [x] UI-API integration (Phase 6)
+- [x] Security vulnerabilities (Phase 7)
+- [x] Environment variable settings (Phase 2/9)
+
+---
+
+## 2. Phase Verification Matrix
+
+### 2.1 Design Phase Verification
+| Phase | Verification Item | Status | Notes |
+|-------|------------------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | Terminology consistency | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| 2 | Convention definition | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| 3 | Mockup approval | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| 4 | API specification | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| 5 | Design system | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 2.2 Implementation Phase Verification
+| Phase | Verification Item | Status | Notes |
+|-------|------------------|--------|-------|
+| 6 | UI-API integration | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| 7 | SEO/Security | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 2.3 Environment Variable Verification
+| Item | Phase 2 Definition | Phase 9 Setting | Status |
+|------|-------------------|-----------------|--------|
+| NEXT_PUBLIC_* | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | |
+| DATABASE_URL | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | |
+| AUTH_SECRET | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | |
+
+---
+
+## 3. Architecture Review
+
+### 3.1 Folder Structure (Based on Phase 2)
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| Matches convention | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Separation of concerns | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Dependency direction | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 3.2 Clean Architecture Verification
+| Layer | Dependency Rule | Status |
+|-------|-----------------|--------|
+| Presentation | → Application, Domain only | ✅/❌ |
+| Application | → Domain, Infrastructure only | ✅/❌ |
+| Domain | Independent (no dependencies) | ✅/❌ |
+| Infrastructure | → Domain only | ✅/❌ |
+
+### 3.3 Discovered Issues
+| ID | Severity | Location | Description | Recommended Action |
+|----|----------|----------|-------------|-------------------|
+| A-1 | High/Medium/Low | | | |
+
+---
+
+## 4. Convention Review (Phase 2)
+
+### 4.1 Naming
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| Files/Folders | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Variables/Functions | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Components | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 4.2 Code Style
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| Import order | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Type definitions | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 4.3 Discovered Issues
+| ID | Severity | Location | Description | Recommended Action |
+|----|----------|----------|-------------|-------------------|
+| C-1 | | | | |
+
+---
+
+## 5. API Consistency Review (Phase 4)
+
+### 5.1 RESTful Principles
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| Resource-based URLs | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Appropriate HTTP methods | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Status code consistency | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 5.2 Response Format
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| Standard format compliance | ✅/⚠️/❌ | `{ data, meta?, error? }` |
+| Error code consistency | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Pagination format | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+---
+
+## 6. Code Quality
+
+### 6.1 Evaluation
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| Duplicate code | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Function complexity | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Error handling | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Type safety | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 6.2 Discovered Issues
+| ID | Severity | Location | Description | Recommended Action |
+|----|----------|----------|-------------|-------------------|
+| Q-1 | | | | |
+
+---
+
+## 7. Security Review (Phase 7)
+
+### 7.1 Client Security
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| XSS protection | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| CSRF protection | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Sensitive info exposure | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+
+### 7.2 Server Security
+| Item | Status | Notes |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| Input validation | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Authentication/Authorization | ✅/⚠️/❌ | |
+| Error messages | ✅/⚠️/❌ | No sensitive info exposed |
+
+---
+
+## 8. Refactoring Plan
+
+### 8.1 High Priority (Required before deployment)
+| Issue ID | Task | Estimated Effort |
+|----------|------|------------------|
+| | | |
+
+### 8.2 Medium Priority (Post-deployment improvement)
+| Issue ID | Task | Estimated Effort |
+|----------|------|------------------|
+| | | |
+
+### 8.3 Low Priority (Future improvement)
+| Issue ID | Task | Estimated Effort |
+|----------|------|------------------|
+| | | |
+
+---
+
+## 9. Summary
+
+### 9.1 Overall Score
+| Area | Score | Related Phase |
+|------|-------|---------------|
+| Architecture | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ / 5 | Phase 2 |
+| API consistency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ / 5 | Phase 4 |
+| UI/UX | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ / 5 | Phase 5, 6 |
+| Security | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ / 5 | Phase 7 |
+| Overall quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ / 5 | |
+
+### 9.2 Conclusion
+- [ ] Ready for deployment (All Phase verifications passed)
+- [ ] Deployable after fixes (Some issues exist)
+- [ ] Major refactoring required
+
+---
+
+## 10. Next Steps
+
+Proceed to Phase 9: Deployment after refactoring completion
+
+### 10.1 Phase 9 Preparation Checklist
+- [ ] Finalize environment variable list (Based on Phase 2)
+- [ ] Confirm secrets list
+- [ ] Prepare CI/CD environment-specific settings