feat: add PKCE support for OAuth2 Authorization Code flows (#5361)

* Add PKCE support.

* Fix tests

* Update oauth2.md

* Rename usePkce

* Fix the BrokenComponent error

* Update oauth2.md

* Remove isCode variable. Remove uuid4 dependency.

* Remove utils functions

* Import crypto

* Fix tests

* Fix the tests

* Cleanup

* Fix code_challenge generation

* Move code challenge and verifier to utils for mocks. Update tests.

* Mock the PKCE methods in the utils file properly.

* Add missing expect

* use target-method spies

* Add comments to explain test values.

* Get rid of jsrsasign.
This commit is contained in:
poveilleux
2019-10-07 20:24:43 -04:00
committed by kyle
parent 8cabcffddf
commit 139592e353
12 changed files with 3542 additions and 7681 deletions

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
/* eslint-env mocha */
import expect, { createSpy } from "expect"
import { fromJS } from "immutable"
import expect, { spyOn } from "expect"
import win from "core/window"
import oauth2Authorize from "core/oauth2-authorize"
import * as utils from "core/utils"
describe("oauth2", function () {
@@ -20,20 +20,55 @@ describe("oauth2", function () {
}
describe("authorize redirect", function () {
it("should build authorize url", function() {
win.open = createSpy()
const windowOpenSpy = spyOn(win, "open")
oauth2Authorize(authConfig)
expect(win.open.calls.length).toEqual(1)
expect(win.open.calls[0].arguments[0]).toMatch("https://testAuthorizationUrl?response_type=code&redirect_uri=&state=")
expect(windowOpenSpy.calls.length).toEqual(1)
expect(windowOpenSpy.calls[0].arguments[0]).toMatch("https://testAuthorizationUrl?response_type=code&redirect_uri=&state=")
windowOpenSpy.restore()
})
it("should append query parameters to authorizeUrl with query parameters", function() {
win.open = createSpy()
const windowOpenSpy = spyOn(win, "open")
mockSchema.authorizationUrl = "https://testAuthorizationUrl?param=1"
oauth2Authorize(authConfig)
expect(win.open.calls.length).toEqual(1)
expect(win.open.calls[0].arguments[0]).toMatch("https://testAuthorizationUrl?param=1&response_type=code&redirect_uri=&state=")
expect(windowOpenSpy.calls.length).toEqual(1)
expect(windowOpenSpy.calls[0].arguments[0]).toMatch("https://testAuthorizationUrl?param=1&response_type=code&redirect_uri=&state=")
windowOpenSpy.restore()
})
it("should send code_challenge when using authorizationCode flow with usePkceWithAuthorizationCodeGrant enabled", function () {
const windowOpenSpy = spyOn(win, "open")
mockSchema.flow = "authorizationCode"
const expectedCodeVerifier = "mock_code_verifier"
const expectedCodeChallenge = "mock_code_challenge"
const generateCodeVerifierSpy = spyOn(utils, "generateCodeVerifier").andReturn(expectedCodeVerifier)
const createCodeChallengeSpy = spyOn(utils, "createCodeChallenge").andReturn(expectedCodeChallenge)
authConfig.authConfigs.usePkceWithAuthorizationCodeGrant = true
oauth2Authorize(authConfig)
expect(win.open.calls.length).toEqual(1)
const actualUrl = new URLSearchParams(win.open.calls[0].arguments[0])
expect(actualUrl.get("code_challenge")).toBe(expectedCodeChallenge)
expect(actualUrl.get("code_challenge_method")).toBe("S256")
expect(createCodeChallengeSpy.calls.length).toEqual(1)
expect(createCodeChallengeSpy.calls[0].arguments[0]).toBe(expectedCodeVerifier)
// The code_verifier should be stored to be able to send in
// on the TokenUrl call
expect(authConfig.auth.codeVerifier).toBe(expectedCodeVerifier)
// Restore spies
windowOpenSpy.restore()
generateCodeVerifierSpy.restore()
createCodeChallengeSpy.restore()
})
})
})