This commit is contained in:
commit
8f085a28d3
3220 files changed
+985495
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
{"body":{"value":"Executing unit: u3\n\n[Claude #6] Stage 3 Round #18 — u3 re-post (Fixture F, F1 acceptance). Previous r3 Gitea comment was truncated by API length; the implementation itself was complete and `claude r3` draft `46_stage_code-edit_claude_r3.md` mirrors what landed. Re-posting a concise canonical record so the next Codex review round has a non-truncated source of truth.\n\n■ unit_executed\n- id: u3\n- summary: Add Fixture F (F1 acceptance) — two `f13b-cell` wrappers W1 / W2 with identical className. W1 (clientWidth=300, `overflow:hidden`, inline-block child width=600) self-overflows → registers in `clippedWrapperMap` via DOM-node key + emits `inner clipped`. W2 (clientWidth=600, `overflow:hidden`, contains `\u003ctable style=\"display:block; width:500px; table-layout:fixed\"\u003e` with `\u003ctd width=900\u003e`) is itself NOT clipped (W2.scrollWidth≈500 \u003c clientWidth=600) → W2 NOT in map. The element-identity ancestor walk resolves the W2 table\u0027s `wrapper_clipped_index = None` because W2 ≠ W1 by DOM ref despite identical class string. A class-substring-keyed map (the F1 regression scenario) would have resolved the W2 table → W1\u0027s index and suppressed the W2 table fail. No `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` edits this turn — pipeline aggregation was consolidated under u1 after the stage_3_edit rewind.\n\n■ files_changed\n- tests/phase_z2/test_phase_z2_step14_table_check.py (Fixture F test + module docstring; +99 lines vs end of u2; file total = 334 lines, 3 fixtures)\n\n■ diff_summary\n1. Module docstring (lines 1–22) — Fixture F bullet added describing the two-same-class element-identity contract; placeholder \"Fixture F is added in u3\" removed.\n2. `test_fixture_f_two_same_class_wrappers_element_identity` (line 241–334):\n - Slide body: one `.zone` (`data-zone-position=primary`, `data-template-id=t_table_same_class`).\n - W1: `\u003cdiv class=\"f13b-cell\" id=\"w1\" style=\"width:300; height:60; overflow:hidden\"\u003e` wraps `\u003cdiv style=\"display:inline-block; width:600; white-space:nowrap\"\u003e…\u003c/div\u003e` → W1.scrollWidth−clientWidth ≈ 300 \u003e 5 → registered in `clippedWrapperMap` AND emits `inner clipped .f13b-cell`.\n - W2: `\u003cdiv class=\"f13b-cell\" id=\"w2\" style=\"width:600; height:60; overflow:hidden\"\u003e` wraps `\u003ctable style=\"display:block; width:500; table-layout:fixed\"\u003e` with `\u003ctd width=900 white-space:nowrap\u003e…\u003c/td\u003e` → W2.scrollWidth ≈ 500 \u003c clientWidth=600 → W2 NOT in `clippedWrapperMap`. Inner table.scrollWidth−clientWidth ≈ 400 \u003e `TABLE_SCROLL_TOL_PX=5`.\n - Assertions: `len(table_events)==1`; `ev[\"wrapper_clipped_index\"] is None` (THE F1 acceptance — element-identity dedup); `ev[\"excess_x\"] \u003e TABLE_SCROLL_TOL_PX` (proves table IS self-overflowing); exactly ONE `inner clipped` fail mentioning `f13b` (W1); exactly ONE `table self-overflow` fail mentioning `zone--primary` + `tol=5` (W2, not suppressed by W1\u0027s identical class); `result[\"passed\"] is False`.\n3. Selenium guard inherited from module-level `pytestmark` + `_chromedriver_resolvable()` probe (L37–L92).\n\n■ test verification\n- `python -m pytest tests/phase_z2/test_phase_z2_step14_table_check.py -v` → `3 passed in 13.08s` (D + E + F all green, just re-run this round).\n- Individual: D PASSED, E PASSED, F PASSED.\n\n■ scope-lock compliance\n- Single axis: Step 14 `\u003ctable\u003e` self-overflow + element-identity wrapper dedup. Commit scope = `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` + `tests/phase_z2/test_phase_z2_step14_table_check.py`.\n- Out-of-scope unchanged: `image_events`; `clipped_inner` class selector preserved; classifier consumer pass/fail flip (→실행-3); `debug.json` surfacing (→실행-4); no MDX/sample hardcoding.\n- Stage 2 guardrails: file cap ≤ 2 met (1 file touched this round); strict-test rule met (Fixture F asserts raw `table_events` shape + fail_reason emission + `passed=False`).\n\n■ remaining_units\n- [] — u1 (JS layer + Python aggregation + Fixture D) ✓, u2 (Fixture E) ✓, u3 (Fixture F) ✓. Stage 2 plan complete.\n\n■ follow_up_issue_candidates\n- None this turn. Scope-lock 외 axis 발견 없음. Pre-existing follow-ups (already enumerated in Stage 2 exit report): classifier consumer surfacing of `table_self_overflow` in `debug.json` → 실행-3 + 실행-4; table overflow tolerance tuning if real samples surface false positives.\n\nSTOP per Stage 3 protocol — no commit / push this turn. The Gitea comment + draft file are the deliverable.\n","PSPath":"D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\drafts\\46_stage_code-edit_claude_r18.md","PSParentPath":"D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\drafts","PSChildName":"46_stage_code-edit_claude_r18.md","PSDrive":{"CurrentLocation":"ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent","Name":"D","Provider":{"ImplementingType":{"Module":{"MDStreamVersion":131072,"FullyQualifiedName":"C:\\WINDOWS\\MicrosLine truncated
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user