This commit is contained in:
commit
8f085a28d3
3220 files changed
+985495
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
{"id":20692,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/54#issuecomment-20692","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/54","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"이경민","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"Executing unit: u4\n\n[Claude #9 — Stage 3 code-edit Round #4]\n\n**unit_executed**: u4 — F-4 annotate fit_verifier (comment-only) + frame_extractor + kei_client 6 legacy hits with INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01 §10.4 marker\n\n**files_changed**:\n- `src/fit_verifier.py` (+1 comment line, 0 deletions, 0 dataclass-field/string-literal/behavioral mutations — comment-only guardrail honored)\n- `src/frame_extractor.py` (+1 comment line, 0 deletions, 0 regex-literal mutations)\n- `src/kei_client.py` (+6 comment lines, 0 deletions, 0 prompt-string mutations)\n\nTotal: +8 comment lines, 3 files. `git diff --numstat` confirms 1/0, 1/0, 6/0.\n\n**diff_summary**:\n\n`src/fit_verifier.py` (1 hit — L612):\n- Inserted ` # [legacy Phase R'/Q example — INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01 §10.4]` immediately above the existing field declaration `content_source: str # \"popup:DX와 BIM의 구분\" 등` inside the `@dataclass class SupplementBlock`.\n- The dataclass field declaration and its inline comment `# \"popup:DX와 BIM의 구분\" 등` are preserved byte-for-byte.\n- Comment-only guardrail satisfied: no field name, type annotation, default value, or import edited. Phase Z partial-live import graph (`FitAnalysis`, `RoleFit`, `redistribute`, salvage routing in `phase_z2_failure_router`) is untouched. The `SupplementBlock` dataclass remains structurally identical, so no consumer of `SupplementBlock(role=..., block_id=..., variant=..., content_source=..., estimated_height_px=..., available_px=...)` is affected.\n\n`src/frame_extractor.py` (1 hit — L167):\n- Inserted ` # [legacy Phase R'/Q example — INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01 §10.4]` immediately above the existing regex line `text = re.sub(r'\\bBIM\\b', 'BIM 건설정보모델링', text)` inside the text-normalization helper.\n- The regex pattern `r'\\bBIM\\b'`, replacement `'BIM 건설정보모델링'`, and surrounding glossary regexes (`r'\\bDX\\b' → 'DX 디지털전환'`) are preserved byte-for-byte. Same regex-glossary guardrail pattern already validated for u2 in `src/block_matcher_tfidf.py`.\n\n`src/kei_client.py` (4 hits — L56, L165, L166, L807):\n\nL56 hit (`\"- 텍스트 재구성이 허용되는 경우는 ...\"` inside the `KEI_PROMPT = (...)` implicit-concatenation block):\n- Inserted ` # [legacy Phase R'/Q example — INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01 §10.4]` between the prior `\"- 원본에 있는 내용을 임의로 제거하거나 다른 의미로 바꾸지 마라.\\n\"` line and the existing `\"- 텍스트 재구성이 허용되는 경우는 **빈 공간에 채울 요약(표, 팝업 요약)만**.\\n\"` line.\n- Comment lives at the Python token level between two adjacent implicit-concatenated string literals, so the resulting `KEI_PROMPT` string value is byte-for-byte unchanged. The substring \"재구성\" still occurs in the final prompt at the same position.\n\nL165 + L166 hits (two adjacent example lines inside the `KEI_PROMPT_B = (...)` implicit-concatenation block):\n- Inserted a single ` # [legacy Phase R'/Q examples — INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01 §10.4]` line (plural \"examples\", since it covers both hits) between `\" - '활용 필요', '구체화 필요' 같은 지시사항을 쓰지 마라. 실제 콘텐츠 항목만 쓰라.\\n\"` and the two existing example lines `\" - 예시: '건설산업(...), BIM(...)'\\n\"` and `\" - 예시: '[이미지: DX와 핵심기술간 상호관계] ... [팝업: DX와 BIM의 구분] 비교표'\\n\"`.\n- Both example string literals are preserved byte-for-byte. The final `KEI_PROMPT_B` string value is unchanged. Two consecutive G3 hits resolved with one marker per Stage 2 plan (\"annotation markers only\").\n\nL807 hit (`Option 2 (핵심 재구성 + 팝업 분리):` inside the `KEI_OVERFLOW_PROMPT = \"\"\" ... \"\"\"` triple-quoted string):\n- Because L807 lives inside a triple-quoted string, an inline `#` marker cannot be placed at the hit site without mutating the prompt text. Per Stage 2 plan (mirroring the u3 `EDITOR_PROMPT` / `get_layout_rules()` treatment), a Python-level marker block was placed immediately above the `KEI_OVERFLOW_PROMPT = \"\"\"...` assignment (between the existLine truncated
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user