untracked files on main: dceb101 feat(#63): IMP-34 R1 donor capacity measured bound (u1+u2)

2026-05-21 22:07:41 +09:00
commit 8f085a28d3
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+[{"id": 20078, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/50#issuecomment-20078", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/50", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "## [Claude #1] Stage 1 — Problem Review (AUDIT-ONLY)\n\n**Audit anchor**: This audit verifies pipeline contracts. It does not optimize any single MDX sample. (per issue body)\n\n### 1. Premise verification (audit feasibility checks)\n\n| Premise | Source | Verified |\n|---|---|---|\n| 22 closed issues exist (#2~#18, #45~#49) | Gitea API `state=closed` listing | YES — all 22 returned |\n| Reference doc `PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.md` exists | `ls docs/architecture/` | YES — 22 steps documented (Block A 0–12, Block B 13, Block C 14–22) |\n| Reference doc `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` exists | `ls docs/architecture/` | YES — IMP-01~IMP-28 backlog rows |\n| No prior `INTEGRATION-AUDIT-*.md` artifacts | `ls docs/architecture/INTEGRATION-AUDIT*` | YES — empty, no file conflict |\n| Closed issue body cites #45~#49 commits (Axis pre-check) | Gitea issue list titles | YES — `[IMP-15 실행-1]`~`[IMP-15 실행-5]` present |\n| MDX samples for representative runs | `ls samples/mdx_batch/` | YES — 01.mdx (image), 02.mdx (image), 03.mdx (smoke), 04.mdx (image+details+sub-section), 05.mdx (text) |\n\n### 2. Anomaly to investigate during Stage 3 (NOT a Stage 1 blocker)\n\nIssue body §\"Parent/child relationship\" requires: *verify #45~#49 close timestamps all precede #15 close*.\n\nEmpirical Gitea API result (`closed_at`):\n```\n#45  2026-05-18T18:07:37+09:00   ← before #15 ✓\n#46  2026-05-18T21:14:44+09:00   ← before #15 ✓\n#47  2026-05-18T21:54:41+09:00   ← before #15 ✓\n#48  2026-05-18T22:35:46+09:00   ← before #15 ✓\n#15  2026-05-19T02:35:05+09:00   ← parent close\n#49  2026-05-19T02:49:56+09:00   ← AFTER #15 by ~15 min ✗\n```\n\n#49 title = `[IMP-15 실행-5] final integration + parent close`. Plausible read: #49's close commit *performed* the #15 parent close, so #15's `closed_at` was stamped first by the cascade, then #49 was closed after the parent-close work landed. This is a workflow-order question for Stage 3 to resolve — flag as Axis 1 finding (scope myopia: child closing after parent), classify as **OK / Warning / Follow-up** based on close-commit evidence. *No Stage 1 action required*.\n\n### 3. Root cause framing (what the audit is for)\n\nNot a bug. The need = *cumulative consistency check* before IMP-19 (Step 8 zone ratio work) starts. 22 closed issues touch overlapping pipeline contract surfaces (debug.json schema / Step 14 / Step 17 / `visual_check_passed` / catalog / frame contracts). The risk is *individually merged YES, cumulatively contradictory*. Audit = 4-axis cross-reference report, no code changes.\n\n### 4. Scope-lock (LOCKED for Stage 2/3/5)\n\n**Allowed Stage 3 outputs (only these paths may be staged at Stage 5)**:\n- `docs/architecture/INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01-REPORT.md`\n- `docs/architecture/INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01-MATRIX.md` (only if combined > 10 KB; merge into REPORT otherwise)\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` (audit-completion row ONLY — single row append, no other rewrites)\n\n**Forbidden file changes (orchestrator P4a auto-rejects Stage 3 YES if touched)**:\n- `src/**` — any production source\n- `templates/**` — frame partials, slide-base, catalog YAML\n- `tests/**` — test fixtures or test code\n\n**Evidence-only (must NOT be staged at Stage 5; report cites paths)**:\n- `data/runs/**` — pipeline run artifacts (debug.json / final.html / preview.png)\n- `.orchestrator/**` — draft mirrors and tmp scratch\n\n### 5. Guardrails (Stage 2/3 must satisfy)\n\n| Rule | Meaning |\n|---|---|\n| `pytest -q tests` baseline | MUST pass before audit work begins AND after audit completes. Audit is doc-only so no behavior change expected — any delta is a regression Stage 2 must explain. |\n| 8000-char Gitea comment cap | Large artifacts (22×22 matrix, full grep output, debug.json diff) → output files, not Gitea body. |\n| 2 representative MDX runs required | 1× `samples/mdx_batch/03.mdx` (smoke baseline, mandated) + 1× structurally different. Recommended pick = `samples/mdx_batch/04.mdx` — confirmed `<details>` Line truncated
				`@@ -0,0 +1 @@`
				[{"id": 20078, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/50#issuecomment-20078", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/50", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "## [Claude #1] Stage 1 — Problem Review (AUDIT-ONLY)\n\nAudit anchor: This audit verifies pipeline contracts. It does not optimize any single MDX sample. (per issue body)\n\n### 1. Premise verification (audit feasibility checks)\n\n\| Premise \| Source \| Verified \|\n\|---\|---\|---\|\n\| 22 closed issues exist (#2~#18, #45~#49) \| Gitea API `state=closed` listing \| YES — all 22 returned \|\n\| Reference doc `PHASE-Z-PIPELINE-OVERVIEW.md` exists \| `ls docs/architecture/` \| YES — 22 steps documented (Block A 0–12, Block B 13, Block C 14–22) \|\n\| Reference doc `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` exists \| `ls docs/architecture/` \| YES — IMP-01~IMP-28 backlog rows \|\n\| No prior `INTEGRATION-AUDIT-.md` artifacts \| `ls docs/architecture/INTEGRATION-AUDIT` \| YES — empty, no file conflict \|\n\| Closed issue body cites #45~#49 commits (Axis pre-check) \| Gitea issue list titles \| YES — `[IMP-15 실행-1]`~`[IMP-15 실행-5]` present \|\n\| MDX samples for representative runs \| `ls samples/mdx_batch/` \| YES — 01.mdx (image), 02.mdx (image), 03.mdx (smoke), 04.mdx (image+details+sub-section), 05.mdx (text) \|\n\n### 2. Anomaly to investigate during Stage 3 (NOT a Stage 1 blocker)\n\nIssue body §\"Parent/child relationship\" requires: verify #45~#49 close timestamps all precede #15 close.\n\nEmpirical Gitea API result (`closed_at`):\n```\n#45 2026-05-18T18:07:37+09:00 ← before #15 ✓\n#46 2026-05-18T21:14:44+09:00 ← before #15 ✓\n#47 2026-05-18T21:54:41+09:00 ← before #15 ✓\n#48 2026-05-18T22:35:46+09:00 ← before #15 ✓\n#15 2026-05-19T02:35:05+09:00 ← parent close\n#49 2026-05-19T02:49:56+09:00 ← AFTER #15 by ~15 min ✗\n```\n\n#49 title = `[IMP-15 실행-5] final integration + parent close`. Plausible read: #49's close commit performed the #15 parent close, so #15's `closed_at` was stamped first by the cascade, then #49 was closed after the parent-close work landed. This is a workflow-order question for Stage 3 to resolve — flag as Axis 1 finding (scope myopia: child closing after parent), classify as OK / Warning / Follow-up based on close-commit evidence. No Stage 1 action required.\n\n### 3. Root cause framing (what the audit is for)\n\nNot a bug. The need = cumulative consistency check before IMP-19 (Step 8 zone ratio work) starts. 22 closed issues touch overlapping pipeline contract surfaces (debug.json schema / Step 14 / Step 17 / `visual_check_passed` / catalog / frame contracts). The risk is individually merged YES, cumulatively contradictory. Audit = 4-axis cross-reference report, no code changes.\n\n### 4. Scope-lock (LOCKED for Stage 2/3/5)\n\nAllowed Stage 3 outputs (only these paths may be staged at Stage 5):\n- `docs/architecture/INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01-REPORT.md`\n- `docs/architecture/INTEGRATION-AUDIT-01-MATRIX.md` (only if combined > 10 KB; merge into REPORT otherwise)\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` (audit-completion row ONLY — single row append, no other rewrites)\n\nForbidden file changes (orchestrator P4a auto-rejects Stage 3 YES if touched):\n- `src/` — any production source\n- `templates/` — frame partials, slide-base, catalog YAML\n- `tests/` — test fixtures or test code\n\nEvidence-only (must NOT be staged at Stage 5; report cites paths):\n- `data/runs/` — pipeline run artifacts (debug.json / final.html / preview.png)\n- `.orchestrator/**` — draft mirrors and tmp scratch\n\n### 5. Guardrails (Stage 2/3 must satisfy)\n\n\| Rule \| Meaning \|\n\|---\|---\|\n\| `pytest -q tests` baseline \| MUST pass before audit work begins AND after audit completes. Audit is doc-only so no behavior change expected — any delta is a regression Stage 2 must explain. \|\n\| 8000-char Gitea comment cap \| Large artifacts (22×22 matrix, full grep output, debug.json diff) → output files, not Gitea body. \|\n\| 2 representative MDX runs required \| 1× `samples/mdx_batch/03.mdx` (smoke baseline, mandated) + 1× structurally different. Recommended pick = `samples/mdx_batch/04.mdx` — confirmed `<details>` Line truncated