3.6 KiB
3.6 KiB
Executing unit: u1
[Claude #3] Stage 3 Round #1 — u1 (backend axis 1)
unit_executed: u1
files_changed:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py
diff_summary:
- Inserted a new deterministic loop above
application_plan_units.append({...})(line 3972~3988) that buildsv4_all_judgments_listfor the current unit. Each entry now carriesmin_height_pxalongside the existingcatalog_registeredfield. Lookup is bound once per candidate (_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)), socatalog_registeredandmin_height_pxshare the same contract read (no extra cost vs prior single call). min_height_pxsource =(_contract or {}).get("visual_hints", {}).get("min_height_px")→ matches the zone-scope pattern atsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py:3771and the catalog field attemplates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:40,89,218,280,351,417,481,544,601,668. ReturnsNonewhen the contract is unregistered or whenvisual_hintsis absent → frontend toleratesundefined.- Replaced the original inline list comprehension at the dict literal (
"v4_all_judgments": [...]) with"v4_all_judgments": v4_all_judgments_list,so the dict literal stays clean and the lookup happens exactly once per candidate. Comment block above the field updated to mention IMP-11 D-2 (u1) addition (per-candidate min_height_px added (None when unregistered)). - Additive only — no field rename, no removal, no semantic change to existing keys (
template_id/frame_id/frame_number/v4_rank/confidence/label/catalog_registeredunchanged in shape and value). Other Step 9 fields untouched. Zone-scopezone_region_plans[].min_height_px(line 3771) untouched.v4_candidates[](non-reject path, line 4008~4018) untouched — minHeightPx will beundefinedon legacy path per Stage 1 scope_lock guardrail. - No AI call added. No catalog mutation. No new import.
get_contractalready imported (line 53).
scope_check:
- Stage 1 axis_1_backend_field: ✅
min_height_pxadded to each v4_all_judgments entry. - Stage 1 guardrail "reuse same lookup (no extra cost)": ✅ single
_contractbinding per candidate, used twice in dict literal. - Stage 1 guardrail "graceful when contract missing": ✅
(_contract or {})short-circuit returnsNone, never raises. - Stage 1 guardrail "no catalog write": ✅
get_contractis read-only. - Stage 1 out_of_scope "Step 8 zone_region_plans output": ✅ untouched (still at line 3771).
- Stage 2 estimate_lines: 10 → actual diff = +17 / −12 (net +5) ≈ aligned; minor overhead from loop expansion vs comprehension for readability and single-lookup.
remaining_units: u2, u3, u4, u5
follow_up_issue_candidates: none discovered. All scope confined to Stage 1 axis_1_backend_field.
rewind_target: continue_same (u1 complete; u2~u5 remain per Stage 2 plan)
=== EVIDENCE ===
- Edited file:
src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:3972-3988(newv4_all_judgments_listbuilder) and:4025-4026(dict literal now references the prebuilt list). - Source of
min_height_px:templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml:40(visual_hints.min_height_px: 230) and 9 other contracts at lines 89/218/280/351/417/481/544/601/668. get_contractsignature:src/phase_z2_mapper.py:56-57→ returnsdict | None.- Zone-scope precedent confirming
.get("visual_hints", {}).get("min_height_px")shape:src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:3771. - No new imports required;
get_contractalready in scope atsrc/phase_z2_pipeline.py:53. - No commits or pushes performed per Stage 3 directive ("DO NOT commit or push").
STOP — awaiting Codex review for u1.