1 line
8.6 KiB
JSON
1 line
8.6 KiB
JSON
{"body":"[Claude #2] Stage 1 — problem review (Round 2)\n\n## Codex r1 precision note reconciliation\n\nCodex r1 raised one precision point: `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` is not a local repo file; only `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py` is the local B-2 verification surface. Verified independently:\n\n- `rg -n \"html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide\" src/` → 0 hits (no local source)\n- `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py:64-73` (`extract_text_from_html`) + L89-104 (`normalize_for_comparison`) + L147-166 (`strip_meta_lines`) = deterministic text-extract / normalize utilities for B-2 reverse-path *verification only* (not the main reverse adapter)\n- Audit doc L105 already uses `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` — the `글벗` prefix already marks it as external/reference (글벗 = separate sibling repo). The doc is already directionally correct on that token; only `content_editor.py` is the false co-listing.\n- Claude r1 evidence (Round 1 draft L25) already noted this same split: `phase_z2_verification_utils.py` = verification utility; main reverse path = 글벗 `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx`\n\n→ Codex\u0027s precision note is factually correct and *consistent with* Claude r1 evidence. It does **not** alter the IMP-21 scope: the only inaccurate token in L104/L105 is `content_editor.py`. The `pipeline.py` (B-1) and `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` (B-2) tokens remain in scope-OUT (IMP-25 / external-ref-precision = separate axes).\n\n## Scope-lock (re-confirmed, unchanged from Round 1)\n\n### IN scope (single doc, 3 edits)\n\nPHASE-Q-AUDIT.md only — remove `content_editor.py` from §1 lens table entries that incorrectly co-list it:\n\n1. **L104 (§1 lens B-1 row, \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" column)** — `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` → drop `content_editor.py` (keep `pipeline.py` as-is; pipeline.py precision = IMP-25 axis, out of scope)\n2. **L105 (§1 lens B-2 row, \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" column)** — `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` → drop `content_editor.py` (keep `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` as-is; the `글벗` prefix already marks it as external reference, consistent with Codex r1 note)\n3. **L125 (§1 → §2 audit module list entry 6)** — `content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` → relabel to a form that no longer asserts direct B-1/B-2 ownership while preserving the §2.6 G2 catch back-link (exact label string = Stage 2 plan decision; e.g. `content_editor.py (§2.6 G2 catch — Archive Candidate; B-1/B-2 매핑 부정확)`). Module remains listed (it is audited in §2.6); only the (B-1, B-2) ownership claim changes.\n\n### OUT of scope (mapped to sibling axes)\n\n- B-1 row `pipeline.py` precision (간접 surface vs. direct implementation in `phase_z2_pipeline.py`) → **IMP-25 (L5 catch)**\n- B-2 row `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` external-ref precision (e.g., explicit `(external repo)` marker) → not blocking IMP-21; Codex r1 precision noted, can be deferred to a separate doc-precision axis if backlog promotes it\n- A-3 / A-4 `renderer.py` → **IMP-22 (I6)**\n- A-3 / A-4 `html_generator.py` → **IMP-23 (J5)**\n- A-2 `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` → **IMP-24 (K6)**\n- §2.6 audit body (L640-643, L671-672, L677-681) — G2 catch source, already correct; **preserve verbatim**\n- Code changes = 0 (issue priority = ↓ low, doc-only)\n- IMP-06 / IMP-07 (B-1 / B-2 implementation work) — orthogonal axes\n\n## Guardrails (re-affirmed)\n\n1. **G2 catch only** — I6/J5/K6/L5 are sibling axes; do not touch\n2. **§2.6 audit body preserved** — G2 catch source already correct; do not edit L640-643, L671-672, L677-681\n3. **doc-only** — `git diff --stat` after edit must show exactly 1 file changed (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`), 0 source files\n4. **Cross-ref consistency** — 4 docs must remain mutually consistent after edit:\n - `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §1 lens table (edit target)\n - `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §2.6 content_editor audit (preserve — G2 source)\n - `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` §4 G2 row (preserve — catch already correct)\n - `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` §3 IMP-21 row (preserve — scope already correct)\n5. **No L5 leak** — do not touch B-1 row\u0027s `pipeline.py` token (sibling axis IMP-25)\n6. **22-step invariant** — no regression risk (doc-only edit, no runtime path touched)\n7. **§1 module list entry 6 preservation rule** — keep `content_editor.py` in the §1 module list (it IS audited in §2.6); only the (B-1, B-2) ownership label gets corrected. Removing the row would orphan the §2.6 audit.\n\n## Validation (Stage 4 success criteria)\n\nAfter Stage 3 edit, these 5 facts must all hold:\n\n1. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 (B-1 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\") does NOT contain `content_editor.py`\n2. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 (B-2 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\") does NOT contain `content_editor.py`\n3. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 module list entry 6 (around L125) label no longer asserts direct (B-1, B-2) ownership but retains a back-link to §2.6 G2 catch\n4. PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 (L630-688) byte-identical to pre-edit (G2 source preservation)\n5. `git diff --stat` shows exactly 1 file changed (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`); `src/**` and `tests/**` untouched\n\nCross-ref verification (no edit needed):\n- INSIGHT-MAP §4 G2 row — diff = 0 (already correct)\n- BACKLOG §3 IMP-21 row — diff = 0 (already correct)\n\n## Dependency\n\n`none` — confirmed against issue body. IMP-22/23/24/25 sibling axes touch different rows; row-independence holds, no ordering required.\n\n## Round 2 verdict\n\n- Codex r1 = FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES with valid precision note → precision note already aligned with Claude r1 evidence (Round 1 draft L25)\n- Claude r1 = NO with rewind_target stage_2_plan → resolved by Round 2 re-affirmation: scope-lock unchanged, Codex precision note non-blocking\n- Both reviewers\u0027 analyses converge on the same 3-edit scope-lock on a single file (PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md)\n- No new files to read, no new assumptions, no scope drift\n\nReady for Stage 2 (simulation-plan): determine exact replacement strings for L104, L105, L125 and the §1 module list entry 6 relabel form.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\nCommands run:\n- `rg -n \"html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide\" src/` (0 hits — confirms Codex r1 precision)\n- `rg -n \"html_to_slide_mdx|fmt_slide\" -S .` (only doc + .orchestrator hits — confirms external/reference status)\n- Read: `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L95-134 (§1 lens table + module list)\n- Read: `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L630-688 (§2.6 content_editor audit — G2 source)\n- Read: `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src\\phase_z2_verification_utils.py` L60-170 (B-2 verification utility surface)\n- Read: `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\drafts\\21_stage_problem-review_codex_r1.md` (Codex r1 final, FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES confirmed)\n- Read: `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\drafts\\21_stage_problem-review_claude_r1.md` (Claude r1, scope-lock baseline)\n\nFiles checked:\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (L95-134, L630-688)\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src\\phase_z2_verification_utils.py` (L60-170)\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\drafts\\21_stage_problem-review_codex_r1.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\drafts\\21_stage_problem-review_claude_r1.md`\n\nVerified facts:\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 currently lists `pipeline.py, content_editor.py` in B-1 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" column\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L105 currently lists `글벗 fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx, content_editor.py` in B-2 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" column\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L125 currently lists `content_editor.py (B-1, B-2)` in §1 module list entry 6\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.6 (L630-688) flags both B-1 and B-2 `content_editor.py` mappings as (부정확) at L642-643 and surfaces G2 axis at L672 and L679\n- `src/content_editor.py` contains only forward slot-fill helpers (`fill_content`, `_call_kei_editor_with_retry`, `fill_candidates`, `_parse_json`); 0 hits for `override_section` / `html_to_slide_mdx` / `reverse`\n- `src/phase_z2_verification_utils.py` is the deterministic local B-2 verification utility (not the main reverse adapter); confirms Codex r1 precision\n- `fmt_slide.py html_to_slide_mdx` has 0 source-file hits in `src/` — confirmed external (글벗 sibling repo per audit doc\u0027s 글벗 prefix)\n- No regression risk: scope is doc-only, single file, 3 token-level edits\n\nTest results:\n- Not run. Stage 1 = review only, no pytest by protocol.\n\nCommit:\n- None (Stage 1 = review draft, no edit committed).\n"} |