Files
C.E.L_Slide_test2/.orchestrator/issues/41_comments_cache.json
T

1 line
133 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
[{"id": 22114, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22114", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan unit assembly helper extraction\n\n## Root cause\n\nStep 9 `application_plan` per-unit dict assembly is currently inline inside `run_phase_z2_mvp1`. IMP-05 Case 7 had to add a `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` source-string guard because there is no helper-level call surface to test directly. The guard catches *literal disappearance* of the `candidate_evidence` + `fallback_chain` lines but cannot verify shape under representative inputs. IMP-32 extracts a pure helper so the guard can be replaced with a direct call test.\n\n## Issue body line number correction\n\nIssue body says `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2687~`. Actual location is `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567` (the per-unit `for i, unit in enumerate(units):` loop body that ends with `application_plan_units.append({...})`). Line 2687 is the unrelated `_write_step_artifact` docstring. Scope-lock anchors to the **4451-4567 span**, not 2687.\n\n## Verified call surface\n\nRead of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567` confirms inline body consumes only these per-unit inputs:\n\n| Symbol | Source | Type |\n|---|---|---|\n| `unit` | `units[i]` (Step 6 composition unit) | obj with `.source_section_ids`, `.v4_candidates`, `.frame_template_id`, `.v4_rank`, `.selection_path`, `.fallback_reason` |\n| `zone_plan` | `zone_region_plans[i] if i < len(zone_region_plans) else {}` | dict (Step 8 output) |\n| `selection_trace` | `v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0], {})` | dict |\n| `plan_record` | `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))` | Optional[dict] |\n| `v4_all_for_unit` | `lookup_v4_all_judgments(v4, _first_sid, alias_keys=section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid))` | list[V4Candidate] |\n| `layout_preset` | outer-scope scalar (same for all units) | str |\n| `layout_candidates_list` | outer-scope scalar (same for all units) | list |\n\nModule-level dependencies still available inside helper: `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` (module constant), `get_contract` (module import).\n\n## Proposed helper signature\n\n```python\ndef _build_application_plan_unit(\n unit,\n zone_plan: dict,\n selection_trace: dict,\n plan_record: Optional[dict],\n v4_all_for_unit: list,\n *,\n layout_preset: str,\n layout_candidates_list: list,\n) -> dict:\n \"\"\"Step 9 per-unit application_plan dict assembly.\n\n Pure factory — no I/O, no global mutation. Caller wraps return value\n in application_plan_units.append(...). Extracted from inline span\n (IMP-32, was src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567).\n \"\"\"\n ...\n```\n\nCall site (replaces 4451-4567 inline body):\n\n```python\nfor i, unit in enumerate(units):\n zone_plan = zone_region_plans[i] if i < len(zone_region_plans) else {}\n selection_trace = v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0], {})\n plan_record = plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))\n _first_sid = unit.source_section_ids[0]\n v4_all_for_unit = lookup_v4_all_judgments(\n v4, _first_sid, alias_keys=section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid)\n )\n application_plan_units.append(_build_application_plan_unit(\n unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit,\n layout_preset=layout_preset,\n layout_candidates_list=layout_candidates_list,\n ))\n```\n\nRationale for keeping the `v4_all_for_unit` *lookup* in the caller (not the helper):\n- Helper stays pure / dependency-injected → trivial to test with synthetic inputs (no real `v4` payload, no `section_alias_by_id` plumbing).\n- `lookup_v4_all_judgments` already has its own coverage upstream; duplicating it inside the helper would re-couple the helper to the global v4 payload shape.\n- Matches the existing pattern where `selection_trace` / `plan_record` are also lookups computed in the caller, not the helper.\n\n## Scope-lock (binding)\n\n1. **Refactor only — zero behavior change.** Output `application_plan_units` list must be byte-identical to pre-IMP-32 for any given input.\n2. **Helper location** = module-level function inside `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, defined before `run_phase_z2_mvp1`.\n3. **Helper signature** = exactly as proposed above (positional: unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit; kw-only: layout_preset, layout_candidates_list).\n4. **Call site change** = swap inline 4451-4567 body for the loop preamble + single `application_plan_units.append(_build_application_plan_unit(...))` call shown above.\n5. **Case 7 rewrite** = `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py::test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` becomes `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` — calls helper directly with synthetic inputs, asserts returned dict has `candidate_evidence == selection_trace[\"candidates\"]` and `fallback_chain == selection_trace[\"candidates\"]` (alias). No more `inspect.getsource` for Case 7.\n6. **Out of scope**:\n - `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` (4 IMP-11 D-2 u1 cases) — these grep `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` for the whole module source; helper still lives in the module so all literals (`IMP-11 D-2 (u1)`, `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)`, `catalog_registered`, `min_height_px` chain, `\"v4_all_judgments\": v4_all_judgments_list`) remain present. Tests stay green without edits. Their own helper-call rewrite is a separate future ticket if needed.\n - No new behavior, no new fields, no schema changes.\n - No changes to Step 9 v0 invariants 1-5 (status.md §4).\n - No changes to Step 9 HTML emitter or `_write_step_artifact` call.\n\n## Guardrails (binding contracts for Stage 3 verification)\n\n- G1: smoke 11/11 green (IMP-04 F17 calibration intact).\n- G2: existing IMP-05 fallback tests (`tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`) all green except Case 7 which is *rewritten* (same behavior coverage, helper-call form).\n- G3: existing 4 IMP-11 D-2 u1 source-guard tests (`tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`) all green **without edit** — proves the inline → helper move preserved every guarded literal.\n- G4: `tests/test_catalog_invariant.py` green (2 catalog invariant tests).\n- G5: byte-identical Step 9 JSON for at least one smoke MDX run (e.g., samples/mdx_batch/02.mdx) — diff `step09_application_plan.json` pre vs post.\n- G6: helper is a pure function — no module-level side effects, no I/O, no mutation of inputs. Verified by reading the helper body.\n\n## Risks / open questions\n\n- **R1**: `unit.fallback_reason` attribute — confirmed accessed at line 4533. Helper must accept it via `unit` and read `unit.fallback_reason`. No DI workaround needed since the existing inline already reads it the same way.\n- **R2**: `plan_record` `None` handling — current inline uses `if plan_record else None / False / []` defaults. Helper preserves the same defensive defaults; pre-IMP-06 readers (no override CLI) continue to see `position=None / assignment_source=None / section_assignment_override=False / replaced_auto_unit=None / skipped_collided_auto_units=[] / skipped_reason=None`.\n- **R3**: Test isolation — the new helper-call Case 7 test must construct a synthetic `unit` (MOCK_ prefix per the existing fully-synthetic guardrail in `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` docstring) and synthetic `selection_trace`. No real catalog template_id / frame_id required because Case 7 only verifies the `candidate_evidence` / `fallback_chain` alias wiring, which is independent of catalog membership. v4_all_for_unit can be `[]` for this case.\n\n## Next stage ask\n\nStage 2 simulation-plan should detail: (a) exact helper body (1:1 line move), (b) exact Case 7 test rewrite body, (c) the pre/post `step09_application_plan.json` diff command for G5 verification.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- Read `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567` — inline assembly body confirmed.\n- Read `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:298-316` — Case 7 source-guard confirmed; comment explicitly notes \"Once that helper exists, replace this source-string guard with a direct helper-call test.\"\n- Read `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` — 4 IMP-11 D-2 u1 source-guard cases use `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` on whole module → unaffected by inline-to-helper move within the module.\n- Grep `application_plan` in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` → 25 hits, only line 4451-4567 is the per-unit assembly; remaining hits are HTML emitter, artifact writer call, and docstrings.\n- `curl` issue #41 comments → 0 prior comments, confirming this is [Claude #1].\n\nAwaiting Codex 1차 review of scope-lock + guardrails.\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:14:37+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:14:37+09:00"}, {"id": 22116, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22116", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review - IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan helper extraction\n\nScope-lock review result: Claude #1 root cause is confirmed, with one planning note below.\n\nVerified facts:\n- The issue-body anchor `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2687~` is stale/wrong. Current line 2687 is inside `_write_step_artifact` docstring/schema text, not Step 9 application-plan assembly.\n- The actual Step 9 per-unit application-plan assembly is inline in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567`, starting at `application_plan_units = []` and ending at `application_plan_units.append({...})`.\n- There is currently no extracted helper named `_build_application_plan_unit` or `build_application_plan_unit`; `rg` only finds the existing source-guard test text that says the helper does not exist yet.\n- IMP-05 Case 7 is exactly the temporary source guard described in the issue: `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316` uses `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` and literal string assertions for `\"candidate_evidence\": selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])`, `\"fallback_chain\": selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])`, order, and the compat-alias comment.\n- The inline unit builder consumes per-unit data from `unit`, `zone_plan`, `selection_trace`, `plan_record`, `v4_all_for_unit`, plus shared `layout_preset` and `layout_candidates_list`. Module-level dependencies `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` and imported `get_contract` are available for a module helper.\n- The proposed helper boundary is valid for behavior-preserving extraction: call-site should keep the per-index lookup work that depends on outer collections (`zone_region_plans`, `v4_fallback_traces`, `plan_record_by_unit_id`, `section_alias_by_id`, `lookup_v4_all_judgments`) and delegate only dict assembly to the helper.\n- Planning note: Step 9 also has IMP-11 D-2 source-string tests in `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`. Stage 2 should explicitly preserve or update those guards when the builder moves into the helper, because they currently search for the inline `v4_all_judgments_list` builder and the `application_plan_units.append` boundary.\n\nNo missing files found for this stage. No pytest was run, per Stage 1 instruction.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\tmp\\codex_prompt.txt'`\n- `rg -n \"application_plan_units|candidate_evidence|fallback_chain|inspect\\.getsource|test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|lookup_v4_all_judgments|APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL\" src tests`\n- `git status --short`\n- `Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src' | Select-Object Name,Length`\n- `Get-Content` line inspection for `src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py:4438-4572`\n- `Get-Content` line inspection for `tests\\test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:285-322`\n- `Get-Content` line inspection for `tests\\test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py:1-85`\n- `Get-Content` line inspection for `src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py:2678-2695`\n- `rg -n \"def run_phase_z2_mvp1|def lookup_v4_all_judgments|def get_contract|from phase_z2_mapper import|get_contract\" src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py src\\phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `rg -n \"plan_record_by_unit_id|zone_region_plans|v4_fallback_traces|section_alias_by_id|layout_candidates_list|layout_preset\" src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `rg -n \"def _build_application_plan_unit|build_application_plan_unit|application_plan unit|application-plan unit\" src tests`\n- `rg -n \"def test_.*v4_fallback|Case [0-9]|IMP-05|candidate_evidence|fallback_chain\" tests\\test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `rg -n \"catalog invariant|load_frame_contracts|frame_contracts|catalog_registered|min_height_px\" tests src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `Get-Content` line inspection for `src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py:1-70`\nFiles checked:\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src\\phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\tests\\test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\tests\\test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\tests\\test_catalog_invariant.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\tests\\test_family_contract_baseline.py`\nTest results: not run (Stage 1 explicitly says NO pytest).\nVerified facts:\n- `src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567` is the current inline Step 9 application-plan unit builder.\n- `src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py:2687` is unrelated `_write_step_artifact` schema/docstring text.\n- `tests\\test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316` is the temporary IMP-05 Case 7 `inspect.getsource` guard to replace in the implementation stage.\n- No existing `_build_application_plan_unit` helper is present under `src` or `tests`.\n- `src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py` already imports `Optional` and `get_contract`, so the proposed helper signature/import dependency is feasible without a new typing import.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:17:22+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:17:22+09:00"}, {"id": 22118, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22118", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-32 #41 helper extraction\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Add private helper `_application_candidates_for_unit(unit)` returning list[dict] (V4 candidate → application_mode mapping via APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL).\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 22\n- id: u2\n summary: Add private helper `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` returning list[dict] with single get_contract bind + (_contract or {}).get chain; carries IMP-11 D-2 (u1) marker comment.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 26\n- id: u3\n summary: Add `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list) -> dict` invoking u1/u2; preserves IMP-05 L2 candidate_evidence/fallback_chain pair + \"compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence\" comment + IMP-06 plan-aware additive fields.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u4\n summary: Replace inline body of `for i, unit in enumerate(units):` (src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567) with `application_plan_units.append(_build_application_plan_unit(...))`; per-index lookups (zone_region_plans[i], v4_fallback_traces.get, plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit)), lookup_v4_all_judgments) stay at call-site.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 20\n- id: u5\n summary: Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 (tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316) from `inspect.getsource` source guard to direct helper-call shape test — assert dict[\"candidate_evidence\"] is selection_trace[\"candidates\"], dict[\"fallback_chain\"] is same list, candidate_evidence appears before fallback_chain in key order, plus list-identity equivalence axis.\n files: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py]\n estimate_lines: 35\n\nPer-unit rationale:\n- u1: pure function of `unit.v4_candidates`; no external state; output identical to current inline `app_candidates` list. Placed just before `run_phase_z2_mvp1`.\n- u2: pure function of `v4_all_for_unit`; preserves single-lookup `_contract` binding so IMP-11 D-2 Cases 1+2 source-string asserts still match literal lines (now inside helper body, still in module source).\n- u3: top-level orchestrator. Builds dict with exact current key set + key order. Embeds IMP-05 L2 comment block + compat-alias comment verbatim so source searches against module text continue to find them. IMP-06 plan_record reads (position/assignment_source/section_assignment_override/replaced_auto_unit/skipped_collided_auto_units/skipped_reason) consumed via `plan_record` arg.\n- u4: pure call-site replacement. Loop index `i` retained for zone_region_plans slicing. Behavior-preserving — same dict, same append.\n- u5: minimal fake unit/zone_plan/selection_trace/plan_record/v4_all_for_unit constructed; direct call asserts four IMP-05 verification axes (candidate_evidence value, fallback_chain alias value, key ordering, list-identity). Docstring updated to drop \"temporary\" wording.\n\nOut-of-scope:\n- IMP-11 D-2 Cases 1+2 source-string guards in tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py — unchanged. Case 2 end-marker `application_plan_units.append` still present at call-site post-u4; IMP-11 D-2 (u1) literal marker stays in module source via u2 helper body. Direct-call rewrite for these cases would expand scope — defer if needed.\n- IMP-11 D-2 Cases 3+4 — catalog-shape tests independent of source location; untouched.\n- application_plan output schema/key order/per-key values, Step 10 frame_selection_evidence merge, Step 6/7/8 inputs, APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL / get_contract semantics.\n- Stage 1 stale anchor `:2687~` ignored — actual span confirmed `:4451-4567`.\n- Stage 1 unresolved Q1 → `_build_application_plan_unit` (private). `from src.phase_z2_pipeline import _build_application_plan_unit` for u5.\n- Q2 → same-file top-level (Stage 1 default).\n- Q3 → preserve IMP-11 D-2 source-string form; only IMP-05 Case 7 rewrites to direct-call.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- One commit per unit; `git revert <sha>` per unit. u4 revert restores inline body; u3/u2/u1 reverts remove dead helpers (no consumer after u4 revert). Pure refactor — no schema migration. After u5 revert, IMP-05 Case 7 source guard restored verbatim.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- Read src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4440-4580 — confirmed inline loop span 4451-4567 (`application_plan_units = []` ... `application_plan_units.append({...})`). Step 9 `_write_step_artifact` at line 4574+.\n- Read tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:280-316 — IMP-05 Case 7: 4 asserts (candidate_line, alias_line, index ordering, compat-alias comment).\n- Read tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py — Cases 1+2 source-string (Case 2 slices marker → `application_plan_units.append`); Cases 3+4 catalog-shape independent.\n- Stage 1 grep: no existing `_build_application_plan_unit` / `_application_candidates_for_unit` / `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` — naming free.\n- Stage 1 commit_sha 182aa7c — HEAD unchanged at Stage 2 entry.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:22:47+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:22:47+09:00"}, {"id": 22120, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22120", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-32 #41\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Add private _application_candidates_for_unit(unit) for V4 candidate to application_mode mapping through APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 22\n- id: u2\n summary: Add private _v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit) preserving the single get_contract(c.template_id) bind, IMP-11 D-2 marker, catalog_registered, and min_height_px chain.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]\n estimate_lines: 26\n- id: u3\n summary: Add _build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list) returning the exact current Step 9 per-unit dict.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py, tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u4\n summary: Replace only the inline Step 9 loop body assembly with a helper call; keep zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, section_alias_by_id, and lookup_v4_all_judgments lookups at call-site.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [pytest -q tests, python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check]\n estimate_lines: 20\n- id: u5\n summary: Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 from production-source guard to direct helper-call shape test, covering candidate_evidence, fallback_chain compat alias, key order, and candidate list identity from selection_trace.\n files: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py, tests/test_catalog_invariant.py, tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py, pytest -q tests]\n estimate_lines: 35\n\nPer-unit rationale:\n- u1: Pure extraction of src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4487-4501. No source lookup or pipeline state moves into the helper.\n- u2: Pure extraction of src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4503-4519. Keeping the marker and literal _contract chain preserves IMP-11 D-2 source guards.\n- u3: Central per-unit dict builder for src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4521-4567. Key order, key set, IMP-05 comments, IMP-06 additive plan fields, and object values are preserved.\n- u4: Behavior-preserving call-site replacement for src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567. Per-index and per-id lookups remain outside the helper per Stage 1 scope_lock.\n- u5: Direct-call test replaces the temporary inspect.getsource guard at tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316 without losing candidate_evidence/fallback_chain/order/compat-alias axes.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- No Step 6/7/8 input-shape changes, Step 10 merge changes, output schema changes, ordering changes, APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL changes, get_contract semantics changes, or MDX 03/04/05 hardcoding.\n- No new module is needed; same-file top-level private helpers minimize blast radius and keep existing source guards pointed at phase_z2_pipeline.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Revert only src/phase_z2_pipeline.py and tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py to restore the inline Step 9 builder and the old Case 7 guard.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- rg Step 9/application_plan/candidate_evidence/fallback_chain in src/phase_z2_pipeline.py\n- rg Case 7/source guards in tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py and tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py\n- git rev-parse --short HEAD\n- git status --short\n- pytest -q tests\n- python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check\nFiles checked:\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567\n- tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316\n- tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py:27-80\n- tests/test_catalog_invariant.py\n- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py\n- scripts/smoke_frame_render.py\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: 408 passed in 86.11s\n- python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check: PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2\nVerified facts:\n- Current inline Step 9 assembly span is src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567, matching Stage 1 and not the stale issue anchor.\n- Required implementation units are each at or below 50 estimated lines and touch at most 1 file each.\n- The plan covers helper extraction, call-site rewrite, IMP-05 Case 7 direct helper-call rewrite, IMP-11 D-2 guard preservation, catalog invariant validation, full pytest baseline, and smoke 11/11 validation.\n- HEAD during review is 182aa7c.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:29:45+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:29:45+09:00"}, {"id": 22122, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22122", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "⚠️ **[Orchestrator]** Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES rejected: unit with `tests: []` (forbidden — implementation + tests = same unit).\n\nRequirements (strict):\n- `=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===` block with at least one `- id: u<N>` entry\n- Each unit MUST include `tests: [<path>, ...]` (NOT `tests: []`)\n- Implementation + tests = same unit (no deferring tests to later units)\n\nExample:\n === IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n - id: u1\n summary: ...\n files: [...]\n tests: [tests/.../test_xxx.py]\n estimate_lines: <int>\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:30:05+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:30:05+09:00"}, {"id": 22123, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22123", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #3] Stage 2 simulation-plan Round #2 — IMP-32 #41 helper extraction (convergence)\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Add private `_application_candidates_for_unit(unit)` → list[dict] via APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL (extraction of src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4487-4501).\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 22\n- id: u2\n summary: Add private `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` → list[dict]; preserves IMP-11 D-2 (u1) marker, single `_contract = get_contract(...)` bind, `catalog_registered` + `min_height_px` chain (extraction of src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4503-4519).\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]\n estimate_lines: 26\n- id: u3\n summary: Add `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` orchestrating u1/u2; preserves exact key set + key order + IMP-05 L2 candidate_evidence/fallback_chain pair + \"compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence\" comment + IMP-06 plan-aware additive fields (extraction of src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4521-4567).\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py, tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u4\n summary: Replace inline body of `for i, unit in enumerate(units):` at src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567 with `application_plan_units.append(_build_application_plan_unit(...))`; per-index lookups (zone_region_plans[i], v4_fallback_traces.get, plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit)), section_alias_by_id, lookup_v4_all_judgments) stay at call-site.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [pytest -q tests, python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check]\n estimate_lines: 20\n- id: u5\n summary: Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 (tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316) from `inspect.getsource` guard to direct helper-call test `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`; assert candidate_evidence is selection_trace[\"candidates\"] (list-identity), fallback_chain is the same list, candidate_evidence precedes fallback_chain in dict key order, plus compat-alias comment source check.\n files: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py, tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py, tests/test_catalog_invariant.py, tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 35\n\nPer-unit rationale:\n- u1: pure fn of `unit.v4_candidates`; identical to current inline `app_candidates`; module-level before `run_phase_z2_mvp1`.\n- u2: pure fn of `v4_all_for_unit`; single `_contract` binding kept so IMP-11 D-2 source-string asserts match literal `catalog_registered` / `min_height_px` lines inside helper body.\n- u3: orchestrator dict builder; IMP-05 L2 + IMP-06 + compat-alias comments verbatim; plan_record reads (position / assignment_source / section_assignment_override / replaced_auto_unit / skipped_collided_auto_units / skipped_reason) routed via `plan_record`.\n- u4: pure call-site replacement; loop index `i` retained for `zone_region_plans[i]`; behavior-preserving.\n- u5: direct-call test with minimal fakes; asserts IMP-05 four axes (value, alias, order, identity) + compat-alias comment retention.\n\nOut-of-scope:\n- Step 6/7/8 input shapes, Step 10 frame_selection_evidence merge, application_plan output schema / key ordering, APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL / `get_contract` semantics. No new module — same-file top-level private helpers. Stale anchor `:2687~` ignored — actual span `:4451-4567`.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- `git checkout HEAD~1 -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`; helpers are additive + replacement is local to one loop body → single-commit revert sufficient.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567 (Read — inline loop body matches Codex r1 sub-spans 4487-4501 / 4503-4519 / 4521-4567).\n- tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316 (Read — Case 7 source guard exact text including `compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence` substring assertion).\n- IMP-11 D-2 marker `# IMP-11 D-2 (u1) — per-candidate min_height_px source = catalog` at src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4503 — must remain literal in module source to keep IMP-11 D-2 guards green (Codex r1 caveat accepted).\n- Codex r1 unit split = Claude r1 u1u5 1:1; two clarifications absorbed: u2 test footprint adds `test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`; u5 test footprint adds `test_catalog_invariant.py` + `test_family_contract_baseline.py`.\n- 1 turn = 1 step ([[feedback_one_step_per_turn]]) — Stage 2 only. No hardcoding ([[feedback_no_hardcoding]]) — helpers data-driven; MDX 03/04/05 untouched. AI isolation ([[feedback_ai_isolation_contract]]) — refactor only.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:32:19+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:32:19+09:00"}, {"id": 22126, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22126", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #3] Stage 2 simulation-plan Round #2 verification - IMP-32 #41\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Add private `_application_candidates_for_unit(unit)` returning application candidate dicts from `unit.v4_candidates` via `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL`; extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4487-4501`.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 22\n- id: u2\n summary: Add private `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` returning Step 9 V4 judgment dicts while preserving IMP-11 D-2 marker, single `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` bind, `catalog_registered`, and `min_height_px` chain; extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4503-4519`.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]\n estimate_lines: 26\n- id: u3\n summary: Add `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` returning the exact current per-unit application-plan dict with unchanged key set/order, candidate evidence fields, compat-alias comment, V4 fields, and IMP-06 additive plan fields; extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4521-4567`.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py, tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u4\n summary: Replace only the inline Step 9 loop assembly with `_build_application_plan_unit(...)`; keep `zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, and `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)` at the call-site.\n files: [src/phase_z2_pipeline.py]\n tests: [pytest -q tests, python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check]\n estimate_lines: 20\n- id: u5\n summary: Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 from source guard to `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`; assert candidate evidence list identity from `selection_trace`, fallback-chain compat alias identity, key order, and compat-alias comment presence.\n files: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py]\n tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py, tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py, tests/test_catalog_invariant.py, tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py, pytest -q tests]\n estimate_lines: 35\n\nPer-unit rationale:\n- u1: Pure extraction of the existing V4 candidate mapping; no pipeline lookup or MDX-specific branch moves into the helper.\n- u2: Pure extraction of the V4 all-judgments builder; preserving literal `_contract` lines keeps IMP-11 D-2 source guards valid unless Stage 3 elects direct helper assertions.\n- u3: Matches the Stage 1 helper boundary exactly: only unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, and layout_candidates_list enter the helper.\n- u4: Maintains all per-index/per-id lookups at the original loop site, so behavior and upstream data ownership stay unchanged.\n- u5: Replaces the temporary IMP-05 Case 7 `inspect.getsource` guard with direct helper-call coverage without dropping candidate_evidence, fallback_chain, ordering, or compat-alias axes.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- No Step 6/7/8 input-shape changes, Step 10 merge changes, output schema changes, key ordering changes, `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` changes, `get_contract` semantic changes, or MDX 03/04/05 hardcoding.\n- No new module is needed; same-file private helpers minimize blast radius and keep existing `phase_z2_pipeline` source guards pointed at the same module.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Revert only `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` and `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`; this restores inline Step 9 assembly and the IMP-05 Case 7 source guard.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run: `rg -n` Step 9/helper/test anchors; `rg --files tests`; PowerShell line-slice reads for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`, `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`; `pytest -q tests`; `git rev-parse --short HEAD`.\nFiles checked: `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567`; `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316`; `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py:1-85`; `tests/test_catalog_invariant.py`; `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`.\nTest results: `pytest -q tests` = 408 passed in 49.26s.\nCommit SHA: 182aa7c.\nVerified facts: current inline Step 9 assembly is exactly at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4451-4567`; no existing `_build_application_plan_unit` or `build_application_plan_unit` helper was found; IMP-05 Case 7 is still the temporary source guard; IMP-11 D-2 guards still assert module source strings; the proposed implementation_units block covers every issue-body axis; every unit is <=50 estimated lines and touches <=3 files; planned side effects are limited to the two scoped implementation/test files plus required Gitea/draft artifacts.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:34:50+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:34:50+09:00"}, {"id": 22129, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22129", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #4] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-32 u1\n\nExecuting unit: u1\n\n■ unit_executed\n- id: u1\n- summary: Add private `_application_candidates_for_unit(unit)` returning application candidate dicts from `unit.v4_candidates` via `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` (pure extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4487-4501` inline block).\n\n■ files_changed\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py\n\n■ diff_summary\n- Inserted new private helper at module level, immediately before `# ─── Main entry ────────────────────────────────────────────────`:\n - Location after edit: `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2829` section header + `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2831` `def _application_candidates_for_unit(unit) -> list[dict]:`.\n - +28 lines: new section banner `# ─── Step 9 application-plan helpers (IMP-32 u1) ───────────────` plus helper body.\n- Helper body is byte-identical (key names, value identity, key order, dict literal style, `# v0 = trace-only` comment on `required_changes`) to the inline block currently at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4513-4527` (was `:4487-4501` before insertion shifted call-site by +26 lines).\n- No call-site change: inline block at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4513-4527` remains untouched (that is u4).\n- No test changes (u1 has empty `tests: []` in Stage 2 plan; helper has no callers yet so behavior is unchanged for any existing test).\n- No imports added; `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` already at module level (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:101`).\n\nVerification of u1 scope-lock (helper-vs-inline equivalence):\n\n| field | helper (after edit) | inline (current call-site) | match |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| iteration | `for c in unit.v4_candidates:` | `for c in unit.v4_candidates:` | ✓ |\n| label lookup | `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL.get(c.label, (\"exclude\", False, None))` | same | ✓ |\n| dict keys | template_id, frame_id, v4_label, application_mode, auto_applicable, required_changes, delegated_to | same | ✓ |\n| `required_changes` | `[] # v0 = trace-only` | `[] # v0 = trace-only` | ✓ |\n| order | template_id → frame_id → v4_label → application_mode → auto_applicable → required_changes → delegated_to | same | ✓ |\n\nSyntax sanity check:\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"` → `OK`\n\n■ remaining_units\n- u2 — Add `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` preserving IMP-11 D-2 marker, single `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` bind, `catalog_registered`, and `min_height_px` chain (extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4503-4519` pre-edit, now `:4529-4545`).\n- u3 — Add `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` returning the full per-unit application-plan dict (extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4521-4567` pre-edit, now `:4547-4593`).\n- u4 — Replace only the inline Step 9 loop assembly with `_build_application_plan_unit(...)` call (keep per-index/per-id lookups at call-site).\n- u5 — Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 (`tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316`) from `inspect.getsource` guard to `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` direct helper-call shape test.\n\n■ follow_up_issue_candidates\n- None. Scope-lock observed; no Step 6/7/8 input-shape, Step 10 merge, output schema, key ordering, `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL`, or `get_contract` semantic changes were touched. No new module introduced.\n\nDO NOT commit / push (Stage 3 unit progress only). Awaiting Codex Round #1 review of u1, then Stage 3 continues with u2.\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:38:37+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:38:37+09:00"}, {"id": 22132, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22132", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #4] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-32 u1\n\nVerified only executed unit u1.\n\nResult: correct for u1. The new private helper `_application_candidates_for_unit(unit)` exists in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, reads only `unit.v4_candidates`, uses `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL.get(c.label, (\"exclude\", False, None))`, and returns candidate dictionaries with the same key order and values as the current inline Step 9 block.\n\nScope check:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` is the only tracked file changed.\n- The Step 9 call-site still contains the original inline `app_candidates` assembly, so u4 was not performed in this unit.\n- No test file was changed, so u5 was not performed in this unit.\n- `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` and `_build_application_plan_unit` are not present yet, so u2 and u3 remain.\n- Syntax parse passed.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git diff -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `rg -n \"_application_candidates_for_unit|for c in unit\\\\.v4_candidates|application_plan_units|v4_all_judgments\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `git status --short`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2826-2856`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4508-4529`\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"`\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\nRemaining units: [u2, u3, u4, u5]\n\nrewind_target: continue_same\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:40:14+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:40:14+09:00"}, {"id": 22134, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22134", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #5] Stage 3 code-edit Round #2 — IMP-32 u2\n\nExecuting unit: u2\n\n■ unit_executed\n- id: u2\n- summary: Add private `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` returning Step 9 V4 judgment dicts while preserving IMP-11 D-2 marker, single `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` bind, `catalog_registered`, and `min_height_px` chain (pure extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4529-4545` post-u1 inline block).\n\n■ files_changed\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py\n\n■ diff_summary\n- Inserted new private helper `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` at module level, immediately after `_application_candidates_for_unit` (u1 helper) and before `# ─── Main entry ────────────────────────────────────────────────`.\n - Location after edit: `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2855` `def _v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit) -> list[dict]:` through `:2876` `return v4_all_judgments_list`.\n- +28 lines total (docstring + IMP-11 D-2 comment block + body + return).\n- Helper body is byte-identical (statement order, key names, value identity, key order, single `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` bind, `catalog_registered`, `min_height_px` chain) to the inline block currently at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4563-4575` (was `:4533-4545` before u2 insertion shifted call-site by +30 lines).\n- No call-site change: inline block at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4563-4575` remains untouched (that is u4).\n- No test changes (u2 has `tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]` in Stage 2 plan only for guard-preservation verification; helper has no callers yet so behavior is unchanged for any existing test).\n- No imports added; `get_contract` already at module level.\n\nVerification of u2 scope-lock (helper-vs-inline equivalence):\n\n| field | helper (after edit, src:2868-2876) | inline (current call-site, src:4563-4575) | match |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| init | `v4_all_judgments_list = []` | `v4_all_judgments_list = []` | ✓ |\n| iteration | `for c in v4_all_for_unit:` | `for c in v4_all_for_unit:` | ✓ |\n| contract bind | `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` | `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` | ✓ |\n| dict keys | template_id, frame_id, frame_number, v4_rank, confidence, label, catalog_registered, min_height_px | same | ✓ |\n| `catalog_registered` | `_contract is not None` | `_contract is not None` | ✓ |\n| `min_height_px` | `(_contract or {}).get(\"visual_hints\", {}).get(\"min_height_px\")` | same | ✓ |\n| return | `return v4_all_judgments_list` | (no return — appended to outer scope dict) | n/a (inline list reused) |\n\nIMP-11 D-2 marker preservation:\n- Helper docstring restates the IMP-11 D-2 contract (`_contract` single bind, `catalog_registered`, `min_height_px` chain).\n- Helper body retains the inline comment block (`# IMP-11 D-2 (u1) — per-candidate min_height_px source = catalog` + 3 follow-up lines) verbatim.\n- Inline block at `:4563-4575` retains its original IMP-11 D-2 comment lines (untouched). Both copies will collapse into one when u4 replaces the call-site.\n\nSyntax sanity check:\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"` → `OK`\n\ngit diff:\n- `git diff --stat src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` → `1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)` (28 u1 + 28 u2).\n\n■ remaining_units\n- u3 — Add `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` returning the full per-unit application-plan dict (extraction of `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4547-4593` post-u1+u2 line numbers; was `:4521-4567` pre-edit).\n- u4 — Replace only the inline Step 9 loop assembly with `_build_application_plan_unit(...)` call (keep per-index/per-id lookups at call-site).\n- u5 — Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 (`tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316`) from `inspect.getsource` guard to `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (direct helper-call shape test).\n\n■ follow_up_issue_candidates\n- None. Scope-lock holds: u2 extracted exactly the lines specified in Stage 2 (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4503-4519` pre-edit / `:4529-4545` post-u1 / `:4563-4575` post-u2 insertion), helper signature matches Stage 2 (`v4_all_for_unit` only), no out-of-scope axes touched (no Step 6/7/8 input-shape change, no Step 10 merge change, no schema/key-order change, no `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL`/`get_contract` semantic change, no MDX 03/04/05 hardcoding).\n\nDO NOT commit or push. Awaiting Codex verification.\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:43:07+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:43:07+09:00"}, {"id": 22137, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22137", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #5] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-32 u2\n\nVerified only executed unit u2.\n\nResult: correct for u2. The new private helper `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` exists in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, reads only `v4_all_for_unit`, binds `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` once per candidate, and returns judgment dictionaries with the same key order and values as the current inline Step 9 block.\n\nScope check:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` is the only tracked file changed.\n- The Step 9 call-site still contains the original inline `v4_all_judgments_list` assembly, so u4 was not performed in this unit.\n- No test file was changed, so u5 was not performed in this unit.\n- `_build_application_plan_unit` is not present yet, so u3 remains.\n- `_application_candidates_for_unit` is present from the previous accepted u1 unit.\n- Syntax parse passed.\n- Targeted IMP-11 D-2 source-marker test file passed.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `git diff -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `rg -n \"_application_candidates_for_unit|_v4_all_judgments_for_unit|_build_application_plan_unit|v4_all_judgments_list|application_plan_units|candidate_evidence|fallback_chain\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2824-2886`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4558-4582`\n- `git diff -- tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `rg -n \"def _build_application_plan_unit|test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias\" src tests`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\nTest results:\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` passed: 5 passed.\nRemaining units: [u3, u4, u5]\n\nrewind_target: continue_same\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:45:01+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:45:01+09:00"}, {"id": 22139, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22139", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #6] Stage 3 code-edit Round #3 — IMP-32 u3\n\nExecuting unit: u3\n\n■ unit_executed\n- id: u3\n- summary: Add `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` returning the exact current per-unit application_plan dict. Pure extraction of the inline `application_plan_units.append({...})` assembly currently at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4691-4737` (post-u1+u2 line numbers; Stage 2 plan range was `:4521-4567` pre-u1/u2). Helper internally calls u1 (`_application_candidates_for_unit`) and u2 (`_v4_all_judgments_for_unit`) so the future u4 call-site shrinks to a single function call.\n\n■ files_changed\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py\n\n■ diff_summary\n- Inserted new module-level helper `_build_application_plan_unit` at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2885-2987`, immediately after `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` (u2 helper) and before `# ─── Main entry ────────────────────────────────────────────────`.\n- +114 lines (signature + docstring + body + return dict). Cumulative working-tree diff vs HEAD = +170 lines (u1=+28, u2=+28, u3=+114).\n- No call-site change: the inline Step 9 loop at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4621-4737` remains untouched (that is u4). Helper is currently unused — has no callers in this unit.\n- No test changes (u3 has `tests: [tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py, tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py]` in Stage 2 plan only for guard-preservation verification; helper has no callers yet so behavior is unchanged for any existing test).\n- No imports added; `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:101`) and `get_contract` already at module level via existing u1/u2 helpers.\n- Helper signature matches Stage 2 contract exactly: `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list) -> dict`. Per-index/per-id lookups (`zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)`) NOT moved into helper — they stay at the call-site per u4 scope-lock.\n\nVerification of u3 scope-lock (helper-vs-inline equivalence):\n\nPer-unit computation absorbed by helper (formerly computed at call-site lines 4623, 4627-4630, 4639-4644):\n\n| field | helper (after edit) | inline (current call-site) | match |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `unit_id` | `\"+\".join(unit.source_section_ids)` (helper L1) | `\"+\".join(unit.source_section_ids)` (4623) | ✓ |\n| `has_v4` | `bool(unit.v4_candidates)` | `bool(unit.v4_candidates)` (4627) | ✓ |\n| `candidate_status` | `\"ok\" if has_v4 else \"no_non_reject_v4_candidate\"` | same (4628) | ✓ |\n| `application_status` | `\"ok\" if has_v4 else \"no_v4_candidate\"` | same (4629) | ✓ |\n| `current_default` | `unit.frame_template_id if has_v4 else None` | same (4630) | ✓ |\n| `plan_position` | `plan_record.get(\"position\") if plan_record else None` | same (4639) | ✓ |\n| `plan_assignment_source` | `plan_record.get(\"assignment_source\") if plan_record else None` | same (4640) | ✓ |\n| `plan_section_override` | `bool(plan_record.get(\"section_assignment_override\")) if plan_record else False` | same (4641) | ✓ |\n| `plan_replaced_auto` | `plan_record.get(\"replaced_auto_unit\") if plan_record else None` | same (4642) | ✓ |\n| `plan_skipped_collided` | `list(plan_record.get(\"skipped_collided_auto_units\") or []) if plan_record else []` | same (4643) | ✓ |\n| `plan_skipped_reason` | `plan_record.get(\"skipped_reason\") if plan_record else None` | same (4644) | ✓ |\n| `app_candidates` | `_application_candidates_for_unit(unit)` (u1 helper) | inline (4658-4671); byte-identical to u1 helper body | ✓ |\n| `v4_all_judgments_list` | `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` (u2 helper) | inline (4677-4689); byte-identical to u2 helper body | ✓ |\n\nReturned dict — key set + key order vs inline `application_plan_units.append({...})` at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4691-4737`:\n\n| # | key | helper | inline call-site | match |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `unit_id` | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |\n| 2 | `layout_preset` | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |\n| 3 | `layout_candidates` | `= layout_candidates_list` | `= layout_candidates_list` | ✓ |\n| 4 | `region_layout_candidates` | `zone_plan.get(..., [])` | same | ✓ |\n| 5 | `display_strategy_candidates` | `zone_plan.get(..., [])` | same | ✓ |\n| 6 | `candidate_status` | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |\n| 7 | `application_status` | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |\n| 8 | `current_default_candidate` | `= current_default` | `= current_default` | ✓ |\n| 9 | `selected_v4_rank` | `unit.v4_rank` | same | ✓ |\n| 10 | `selection_path` | `unit.selection_path` | same | ✓ |\n| 11 | `fallback_used` | `bool(unit.selection_path and \"fallback\" in unit.selection_path)` | same | ✓ |\n| 12 | `fallback_reason` | `unit.fallback_reason` | same | ✓ |\n| 13 | `candidate_evidence` | `selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])` | same | ✓ |\n| 14 | `fallback_chain` | `selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])` (compat alias) | same (compat alias comment preserved) | ✓ |\n| 15 | `v4_candidates` | list comp of 6-key dicts from `unit.v4_candidates` | same | ✓ |\n| 16 | `v4_all_judgments` | `= v4_all_judgments_list` (u2 helper output) | inline list (same shape) | ✓ |\n| 17 | `application_candidates` | `= app_candidates` (u1 helper output) | inline list (same shape) | ✓ |\n| 18 | `position` | `= plan_position` | same | ✓ |\n| 19 | `assignment_source` | `= plan_assignment_source` | same | ✓ |\n| 20 | `section_assignment_override` | `= plan_section_override` | same | ✓ |\n| 21 | `replaced_auto_unit` | `= plan_replaced_auto` | same | ✓ |\n| 22 | `skipped_collided_auto_units` | `= plan_skipped_collided` | same | ✓ |\n| 23 | `skipped_reason` | `= plan_skipped_reason` | same | ✓ |\n\nComment preservation (IMP-05 L2 / IMP-06 / IMP-11 D-2 markers — required by Stage 2 guardrails):\n- IMP-05 L2 comment block above `candidate_evidence` / `fallback_chain` (\"compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence\") — preserved verbatim in helper (above keys 13-14).\n- Step 7-A axis 보강 comment block above `v4_all_judgments` (length / catalog_registered / IMP-11 D-2 (u1) min_height_px) — preserved verbatim in helper (above key 16).\n- IMP-06 blocker-fix comment block above `position`...`skipped_reason` — preserved verbatim in helper (above keys 18-23).\n- IMP-06 plan-aware additive-fields comment block above `plan_position`...`plan_skipped_reason` extraction — preserved verbatim in helper (above the plan_* extraction).\n- IMP-11 D-2 markers — single `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` bind, `catalog_registered`, `min_height_px` chain — already preserved inside u2 helper (no duplication here; helper just calls u2).\n\nOut-of-scope confirmation:\n- No call-site rewrite (u4 scope, deferred).\n- No test edits (u5 scope, deferred).\n- No new module — same-file private helper only.\n- No Step 6/7/8 input-shape change, no Step 10 merge change, no `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` change, no `get_contract` semantic change.\n- No MDX 03/04/05 hardcoding.\n\nPer-index/per-id lookups confirmed staying at call-site (NOT moved into helper):\n- `zone_region_plans[i]` (4625) — call-site.\n- `v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0], {})` (4631) — call-site.\n- `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))` (4638) — call-site.\n- `section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid)` (4654) — call-site.\n- `lookup_v4_all_judgments(v4, _first_sid, alias_keys=...)` (4653-4655) — call-site.\n\nSyntax sanity check:\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"` → `OK`\n\nHelper-as-yet-unused check (expected — call-site rewrite is u4):\n- `rg -n \"_build_application_plan_unit\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` → only the `def` line (`:2885`). No invocation yet.\n\n■ remaining_units\n- u4 — Replace inline Step 9 loop assembly at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4658-4737` with single `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` call. Per-index/per-id lookups stay at call-site. Net delete ≈ 80 lines (inline → 1 call). After u4, run `pytest -q tests` + `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check` to confirm behavior unchanged.\n- u5 — Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 at `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316`: `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (`inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` literal-string guard) → `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (direct helper-call shape test). Assert candidate_evidence list identity from `selection_trace`, fallback_chain compat alias identity, key order, and compat-alias comment presence.\n\n■ follow_up_issue_candidates\n- (none) — no scope-lock 외 axis discovered during u3. Helper boundary clean; u1/u2 reuse via direct call; comment markers preserved; per-index/per-id lookups intact at call-site.\n\nrewind_target: continue_same\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:50:03+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:50:03+09:00"}, {"id": 22142, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22142", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #6] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-32 u3\n\nVerified only executed unit u3.\n\nResult: correct for u3. The new private helper `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` exists in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, stays within the planned input boundary, and returns the same per-unit application-plan dictionary shape as the still-inline Step 9 assembly.\n\nScope check:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` is the only tracked file changed.\n- The helper signature matches the Stage 2 contract exactly.\n- Per-index/per-id lookups remain at the call-site: `zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, and `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)`.\n- The Step 9 call-site still contains the original inline `application_plan_units.append({...})` assembly, so u4 was not performed in this unit.\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` still contains `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` and the `inspect.getsource` guard, so u5 was not performed in this unit.\n- `_application_candidates_for_unit` and `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` are used by the new helper and remain present from the previous accepted units.\n- Key order and value sources in the helper return dict match the current inline block, including `candidate_evidence`, `fallback_chain`, `v4_candidates`, `v4_all_judgments`, `application_candidates`, and the IMP-06 additive plan fields.\n- Minor note: the helper docstring's internal line-number anchor is stale after insertion, but this does not change behavior or the extraction boundary.\n- Syntax parse passed.\n- Targeted Step 9 tests passed.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `rg -n \"def _application_candidates_for_unit|def _v4_all_judgments_for_unit|def _build_application_plan_unit|application_plan_units|app_candidates|v4_all_judgments_list|candidate_evidence|fallback_chain|plan_position|plan_assignment_source\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `git diff -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2885-3000`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4621-4738`\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `rg -n \"test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|inspect\\\\.getsource|_build_application_plan_unit\\\\(\" tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\nTest results:\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"` passed: `OK`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` passed: 18 passed.\nRemaining units: [u4, u5]\n\nrewind_target: continue_same\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:52:33+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:52:33+09:00"}, {"id": 22144, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22144", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #7] Stage 3 code-edit Round #4 — IMP-32 u4\n\nExecuting unit: u4\n\n■ unit_executed\n- id: u4\n- summary: Replace only the inline Step 9 loop assembly with `_build_application_plan_unit(...)`; keep `zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, and `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)` at the call-site.\n\n■ files_changed\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py\n\n■ diff_summary\n- Working-tree cumulative numstat vs HEAD = `185 insertions / 98 deletions` in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` (u1+u2+u3 helpers add ~170 lines; u4 net = the call-site shrinkage that brings the total to +87 net for the file).\n- Replaced inline per-unit `application_plan_units.append({...})` assembly at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4621-4737` (pre-u4) with a `_build_application_plan_unit(...)` call. The new call-site loop now spans `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4621-4654`.\n- Per-index / per-id lookups remain at the call-site (per Stage 2 u4 scope-lock):\n - `zone_plan = zone_region_plans[i] if i < len(zone_region_plans) else {}` (`:4624`)\n - `selection_trace = v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0], {})` (`:4625`)\n - `plan_record = plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))` (`:4626`)\n - `_first_sid = unit.source_section_ids[0]` + `v4_all_for_unit = lookup_v4_all_judgments(v4, _first_sid, alias_keys=section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid))` (`:4634-4637`)\n- Helper invocation passes exactly the 7 parameters from the Stage 2 contract: `unit`, `zone_plan`, `selection_trace`, `plan_record`, `v4_all_for_unit`, `layout_preset`, `layout_candidates_list` (`:4644-4653`).\n- Inline `app_candidates` builder, inline `v4_all_judgments_list` builder, IMP-06 plan-field extraction, and the entire `.append({...})` dict literal are removed from the call-site (they now live inside u1/u2/u3 helpers, called from `_build_application_plan_unit`).\n- Comment marker added at call-site (`:4639-4643`) documenting IMP-32 u4 boundary (extraction note + per-index/per-id lookups stay at call-site). The IMP-11 D-2 / IMP-05 L2 / IMP-06 comment blocks are no longer at the call-site — they remain inside the helper body (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2933-2939` for IMP-06, `:2963-2967` for IMP-05 L2 + compat-alias comment, `:2979-2985` for Step 7-A + IMP-11 D-2).\n- No test changes (u4 has `tests: [pytest -q tests, python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check]` in Stage 2 plan only for behavior verification; the IMP-05 Case 7 source guard rewrite is u5).\n- No imports added or removed; `_build_application_plan_unit` and the three helpers were already module-level after u1/u2/u3.\n\nVerification of u4 scope-lock (call-site behavior preservation):\n\n| call-site axis | before u4 (`:4622-4737`) | after u4 (`:4622-4654`) | match |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| outer iteration | `for i, unit in enumerate(units):` | `for i, unit in enumerate(units):` | ✓ |\n| per-index zone_plan | `zone_region_plans[i] if i < len(zone_region_plans) else {}` | same (`:4624`) | ✓ |\n| per-section selection_trace | `v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0], {})` | same (`:4625`) | ✓ |\n| per-id plan_record | `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))` | same (`:4626`) | ✓ |\n| per-section _first_sid | `unit.source_section_ids[0]` | same (`:4634`) | ✓ |\n| section_alias_by_id lookup | `section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid)` (inside `alias_keys=`) | same (`:4636`) | ✓ |\n| lookup_v4_all_judgments | `lookup_v4_all_judgments(v4, _first_sid, alias_keys=section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid))` | same (`:4635-4637`) | ✓ |\n| dict assembly path | inline `.append({...})` | `application_plan_units.append(_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list))` | ✓ (helper output = inline dict per u3 verification) |\n| downstream consumers | `application_plan_units` list of dicts with same key set/order | identical (helper return dict matches u3 contract) | ✓ |\n\nOut-of-scope preserved (untouched):\n- Step 6/7/8 input-shape (units, v4, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list, v4_fallback_traces, plan_record_by_unit_id, zone_region_plans, section_alias_by_id) — all sourced from upstream Step blocks; not modified.\n- Step 10 frame_selection_evidence merge — `:4716` loop over `application_plan_units` is unchanged.\n- `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` (`:101`) and `get_contract` semantics — unchanged (still consumed only via u1/u2 helpers).\n- No MDX 03/04/05 hardcoding introduced.\n- IMP-05 Case 7 `inspect.getsource` guard at `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316` is intentionally untouched — that rewrite is u5.\n- IMP-11 D-2 source-string markers in `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` continue to point at the same module; the literal `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` / `catalog_registered` / `min_height_px` lines are preserved inside `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` (u2 helper).\n\nSyntax + targeted regression:\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"` → `OK`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` → `22 passed in 2.22s` (IMP-05 Case 7 source guard still green because the literal `candidate_evidence` / `fallback_chain` / compat-alias lines now live inside `_build_application_plan_unit` in the same module `phase_z2_pipeline`; IMP-11 D-2 markers green because the `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` block now lives inside `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` in the same module).\n\nScope-lock confirmation (Stage 1 + Stage 2 contracts):\n- Helper signature unchanged from Stage 2: `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list) -> dict`.\n- Per-index/per-id lookups (4 of them) remain at the call-site exactly as planned.\n- Output `application_plan_units` retains the same per-unit dict shape (key set + key order + value identity) verified in u3 + retained through this unit since the helper itself was not changed.\n- No new module introduced (same-file private helpers per Stage 1 default).\n- No review_required gates introduced ([[feedback_auto_pipeline_first]]).\n- No hardcoding ([[feedback_no_hardcoding]]).\n- 1 turn = 1 step ([[feedback_one_step_per_turn]]): u4 only; u5 deferred to Round #5.\n\n■ remaining_units\n- u5 — Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 from `inspect.getsource` source guard to `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (helper-call form). Assert: `candidate_evidence` is `selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])` identity; `fallback_chain` is the same list identity (compat alias); key order in the returned dict; compat-alias comment text still present somewhere in the helper source (or replaced by code-comment assertion against `_build_application_plan_unit` body). Target file: `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316`.\n\n■ follow_up_issue_candidates\n- (none) — u4 is a pure call-site swap. No new axes surfaced outside the Stage 2 scope-lock.\n\nsource_comment_ids: [Claude #7]\n\nevidence:\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4621-4654 (post-u4 call-site, helper invocation)\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2831-2882 (u1+u2 helpers, untouched)\n- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2885-2996 (u3 `_build_application_plan_unit`, untouched)\n- tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316 (IMP-05 Case 7 source guard, intentionally untouched — u5 target)\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` → 22 passed\n- `git diff --numstat src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` → `185 / 98 / src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` (cumulative u1+u2+u3+u4)\n\ncommit_sha: 182aa7c (Stage 3 working-tree baseline; no commit pushed for u4 per Stage 3 rules)\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T02:56:13+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T02:56:13+09:00"}, {"id": 22148, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22148", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #7] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-32 u4\n\nVerified only executed unit u4.\n\nResult: correct for u4. The Step 9 loop now keeps the required per-index/per-id lookups at the call-site and delegates only the per-unit application-plan dictionary assembly to `_build_application_plan_unit(...)`.\n\nScope check:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` is the only tracked file changed.\n- The call-site still computes `zone_plan = zone_region_plans[i] if i < len(zone_region_plans) else {}`.\n- The call-site still computes `selection_trace = v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0], {})`.\n- The call-site still computes `plan_record = plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`.\n- The call-site still computes `_first_sid = unit.source_section_ids[0]` and calls `lookup_v4_all_judgments(v4, _first_sid, alias_keys=section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid))`.\n- `_build_application_plan_unit(...)` is called with exactly the planned seven inputs: `unit`, `zone_plan`, `selection_trace`, `plan_record`, `v4_all_for_unit`, `layout_preset`, and `layout_candidates_list`.\n- The inline `application_plan_units.append({...})` dictionary, inline application-candidate builder, inline V4 all-judgments builder, and inline IMP-06 plan-field extraction were removed from the call-site and now live behind the helper path added by u1-u3.\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` still contains the old `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` source guard, so u5 has not been performed in this unit.\n- No test files were changed in u4.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `rg -n \"def _application_candidates_for_unit|def _v4_all_judgments_for_unit|def _build_application_plan_unit|application_plan_units|_build_application_plan_unit\\\\(|zone_region_plans\\\\[i\\\\]|v4_fallback_traces\\\\.get|plan_record_by_unit_id\\\\.get|lookup_v4_all_judgments|section_alias_by_id|getsource|test_build_application_plan_unit|test_step9_production_emits_candidate\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `git diff -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2885-3000`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4621-4654`\n- line inspection for `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py:1-95`\n- line inspection for `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301-316`\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `pytest -q tests`\n- `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check`\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\nTest results:\n- Syntax parse passed: `OK`.\n- Targeted Step 9 tests passed: `18 passed in 1.48s`.\n- Full test suite passed: `408 passed in 90.14s`.\n- Smoke self-check passed: `PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2`.\nRemaining units: [u5]\n\nrewind_target: continue_same\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:00:00+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:00:00+09:00"}, {"id": 22150, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22150", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #8] Stage 3 code-edit Round #5 — IMP-32 u5\n\nExecuting unit: u5\n\n■ unit_executed\n- id: u5\n- summary: Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 from `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` literal-string guard (introduced at commit `23d1b25` while Step 9 unit assembly was inline) to `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` — a direct helper-call shape test against the IMP-32 u3 helper. All four Stage 2 verification axes preserved: candidate_evidence list identity from `selection_trace[\"candidates\"]`, fallback_chain compat-alias identity (same list object), key order (candidate_evidence before fallback_chain), and compat-alias comment presence on the helper's fallback_chain line.\n\n■ files_changed\n- tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py\n\n■ diff_summary\n- Replaced the IMP-05 Case 7 source-guard at `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:298-316` (pre-u5) with a direct helper-call test at `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:298-372` (post-u5).\n- Cumulative working-tree diff for this file vs HEAD = `+72 / -16` lines (i.e. +56 net), per `git diff --stat`.\n- Test function renamed per Stage 1 contract: `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` → `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`.\n- Section header comment updated: `# ─── Case 7 : Step 9 production-source guard (Codex #20 blocker fix) ───` → `# ─── Case 7 : Step 9 helper-call shape test (IMP-32 u5 — replaces source guard) ───`. Case 7 numbering preserved (Cases 1~6 above, Case 8 below remain unchanged).\n- New test builds duck-typed synthetic inputs entirely in-function: `SimpleNamespace` v4_candidate (template_id / frame_id / frame_number / v4_rank / confidence / label per `V4Match` dataclass attrs at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:168-176`), `SimpleNamespace` unit (source_section_ids / v4_candidates / v4_rank / selection_path / fallback_reason / frame_template_id), a `candidates_list` reference shared via `selection_trace = {\"candidates\": candidates_list}`, `zone_plan={}`, `plan_record=None`, `v4_all_for_unit=[]`, `layout_preset=\"Type A\"`, `layout_candidates_list=[]`.\n- Test imports added are local-only: `from types import SimpleNamespace` + `from src.phase_z2_pipeline import _build_application_plan_unit` (both inside the test function body to keep module-level imports unchanged). `inspect` was already imported at module top (`tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:23`).\n- No other test file changed. No production code change in this unit (u5 is test-only). `inspect.getsource` call is preserved but scoped to the helper (`_build_application_plan_unit`) rather than the whole `phase_z2_pipeline` module, satisfying the \"compat-alias comment presence\" axis of Stage 2.\n\nVerification of u5 scope-lock (axis-by-axis equivalence with pre-u5 source guard):\n\n| axis | pre-u5 (source guard) | post-u5 (helper-call test) | preserved |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| candidate_evidence presence | string-contains `'\"candidate_evidence\": selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])'` in module source | `assert result[\"candidate_evidence\"] is candidates_list` | ✓ (stronger — checks runtime identity, not just source literal) |\n| fallback_chain compat alias | string-contains `'\"fallback_chain\": selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])'` in module source | `assert result[\"fallback_chain\"] is candidates_list` | ✓ (stronger — identity vs equality) |\n| key order | `source.index(candidate_line) < source.index(alias_line)` (source byte offsets) | `keys.index(\"candidate_evidence\") < keys.index(\"fallback_chain\")` (dict insertion order) | ✓ |\n| compat-alias comment | `\"compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence\" in source` (whole-module source) | `\"compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence\" in inspect.getsource(_build_application_plan_unit)` (helper-scoped source) | ✓ |\n\nTest results (`pytest -q tests` + 4 Stage-2 listed targeted tests + smoke):\n\n```\n$ python -m pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py::test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias -x\n. [100%]\n1 passed in 0.23s\n\n$ python -m pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py\n...................... [100%]\n22 passed in 0.16s\n\n$ python -m pytest -q tests\n408 passed in 64.16s\n\n$ python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check\n-- summary: PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2 --\n```\n\n- u5 target test: 1 passed.\n- 4 Stage-2 listed targeted tests: 22 passed (test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py = 14, test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py = 5, test_catalog_invariant.py + test_family_contract_baseline.py = 3 combined).\n- Full `pytest -q tests`: 408 passed.\n- Smoke `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check`: 11 PASS / 0 FAIL / 2 SKIP (SKIP = `app_sw_package_vs_solution` + `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`, both \"no bundled fixture\", unchanged from baseline).\n\nCumulative IMP-32 u1+u2+u3+u4+u5 working-tree diff vs HEAD `182aa7c`:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`: +170 / -83 (+87 net) — u1/u2/u3 helpers added at module level (~170 lines), u4 call-site shrinkage (-83 lines from inline assembly removal).\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`: +72 / -16 (+56 net) — u5 helper-call test replacing IMP-05 Case 7 source guard.\n- Total: 2 files, +242 / -99 = +143 net.\n\nScope-lock confirmation (no scope creep):\n- Only the two files in Stage 2 `files:` list were touched: `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` (u1~u4) + `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` (u5). Per `git status --short` cleanliness.\n- No new module created (same-file private helpers per Stage 2 lock).\n- Step 9 output schema / key order / candidate_evidence ↔ fallback_chain pair / compat-alias comment / IMP-06 additive plan fields / IMP-11 D-2 single `_contract` bind + `catalog_registered` + `min_height_px` chain — all preserved (verified by 408-test suite + IMP-11 D-2 source-marker test still green).\n- IMP-05 Case 7 verification axes (candidate_evidence + fallback_chain + ordering + compat-alias comment) all preserved as helper-call assertions.\n- Per-index/per-id lookups (`zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)`) remain at call-site (u4 invariant).\n\n■ remaining_units\n- (none) — All 5 Stage 2 implementation_units (u1, u2, u3, u4, u5) are now complete. Ready for FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES if Codex r5 verifies clean.\n\n■ follow_up_issue_candidates\n- (none) — No scope-lock-外 axis discovered during u5. The Stage 1/2 scope-lock anticipated all five units; helper extraction is byte-preserving and Case 7 rewrite is axis-preserving. Stage 1 Section \"out_of_scope\" items (Step 6/7/8 input shapes, Step 10 merge, APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL / get_contract semantics, MDX 03/04/05 hardcoding) remain untouched and unmodified.\n\nCommit status: NOT committed, NOT pushed (per Stage 3 rule \"DO NOT commit or push. The Gitea comment IS the deliverable\").\n\nbaseline_commit_sha: 182aa7c (HEAD on `main` — unchanged through Stage 3 Rounds 1~5; commit happens in Stage 5).\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:05:45+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:05:45+09:00"}, {"id": 22153, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22153", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #8] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-32 u5\n\nVerified only executed unit u5.\n\nResult: correct for u5. The old IMP-05 Case 7 module-level source guard was replaced with `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`, a direct call against `_build_application_plan_unit(...)`.\n\nScope check:\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` is the only file changed by u5.\n- The test imports `_build_application_plan_unit` locally and uses synthetic `SimpleNamespace` inputs; no real catalog IDs or MDX sample data were introduced.\n- The test asserts `candidate_evidence` is the exact `selection_trace[\"candidates\"]` list object.\n- The test asserts `fallback_chain` is the exact same list object, preserving the compat alias axis.\n- The test asserts key order with `candidate_evidence` before `fallback_chain`.\n- The test keeps the compat-alias comment guard, now scoped to `inspect.getsource(_build_application_plan_unit)` instead of the whole production module.\n- The old `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` function is gone.\n- Production code was not changed by u5; the u4 call-site still delegates to `_build_application_plan_unit(...)`.\n- All planned implementation units u1 through u5 are complete.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `git diff -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `rg -n \"def _application_candidates_for_unit|def _v4_all_judgments_for_unit|def _build_application_plan_unit|test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|inspect\\\\.getsource|candidate_evidence|fallback_chain|Remaining units\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2880-2995`\n- line inspection for `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4620-4658`\n- line inspection for `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:1-35` and `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:295-375`\n- line inspection for `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py:1-95`\n- `python -c \"import ast; ast.parse(open('src/phase_z2_pipeline.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); ast.parse(open('tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py', encoding='utf-8').read()); print('OK')\"`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py::test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\nTest results:\n- Syntax parse passed: `OK`.\n- Focused u5/helper guard tests passed: `6 passed in 0.14s`.\nRemaining units: none\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:08:01+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:08:01+09:00"}, {"id": 22155, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22155", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #9] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-32 u1~u5 full verification\n\n📌 **PASS**\n\n■ Targeted tests\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` → **22 passed in 0.16s**\n- IMP-05 Case 7 reborn: `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (helper-call form) ✓\n- IMP-11 D-2 guards in `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` ✓ (literal `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` + `catalog_registered` + `min_height_px` chain preserved in `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` body — source-string axis intact).\n\n■ Full pytest\n- `pytest -q tests` → **408 passed in 50.35s** (0 fail, 0 skip).\n\n■ Smoke harness\n- `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check` → **PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2** (SKIPs = `app_sw_package_vs_solution` / `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`, both \"no bundled fixture\" — pre-existing baseline state, unchanged by IMP-32).\n\n■ Diff ↔ Stage 2 plan verification (per unit)\n\n| Unit | Plan target | Actual file:line | Match |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| u1 | `_application_candidates_for_unit(unit)` pure extraction of v4_candidates → application candidate dicts via `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` | `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2831-2853` | ✓ |\n| u2 | `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit(v4_all_for_unit)` preserving IMP-11 D-2 single `_contract` bind + `catalog_registered` + `min_height_px` chain | `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2855-2882` | ✓ |\n| u3 | `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list)` returning byte-identical per-unit application_plan dict | `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2885-3000` | ✓ |\n| u4 | Replace only the inline Step 9 loop body with `_build_application_plan_unit(...)`; keep `zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)` at call-site | `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4620-4657` | ✓ |\n| u5 | Rewrite IMP-05 Case 7 source guard → direct helper-call test `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (4 axes: candidate_evidence identity, fallback_chain identity, key order, compat-alias comment) | `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:298-372` | ✓ |\n\n■ Invariant axis check (helper output)\n\n| Axis | Expected | Verified |\n|---|---|---|\n| Key set + key order of per-unit application_plan dict | 23 keys, unit_id → skipped_reason (pre-IMP-32 order) | ✓ — diff confirms identical block, helper returns `{...}` literal in same order |\n| candidate_evidence list identity | `selection_trace.get(\"candidates\", [])` | ✓ — u5 asserts `result[\"candidate_evidence\"] is candidates_list` |\n| fallback_chain compat alias identity | same list object as candidate_evidence | ✓ — u5 asserts `result[\"fallback_chain\"] is candidates_list` |\n| candidate_evidence before fallback_chain | helper key order preserved | ✓ — u5 asserts `keys.index(\"candidate_evidence\") < keys.index(\"fallback_chain\")` |\n| `compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence` comment | on helper's fallback_chain line | ✓ — u5 asserts `\"compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence\" in inspect.getsource(_build_application_plan_unit)` |\n| IMP-11 D-2 markers (single `_contract` bind, `catalog_registered`, `min_height_px` chain) | preserved literally in `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` body | ✓ — `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` 4 source-string guards still pass against the helper body |\n| IMP-06 additive plan fields | `position`/`assignment_source`/`section_assignment_override`/`replaced_auto_unit`/`skipped_collided_auto_units`/`skipped_reason` → None / None / False / None / [] / None when `plan_record is None` | ✓ — preserved in helper, same conditionals |\n\n■ Hardcoding check\n- u5 test uses `SimpleNamespace` synthetic V4Match-shape inputs (`MOCK_template_direct_a`, `MOCK_frame_001`); no MDX 03/04/05 fixtures, no real catalog template_id, no Selenium render — fresh-sample budget protected.\n- No new constants, no fallback values, no domain branches added.\n- Helper logic 100% data-driven from inputs (no module-global state read beyond `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` and `get_contract`, both unchanged).\n\n■ Regression check (out-of-scope axes verified untouched)\n- Step 6/7/8 input shapes: unchanged (call-site reads still `zone_region_plans[i]`, `units[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0])`).\n- Step 10 frame_selection_evidence merge: not in diff range.\n- `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` / `get_contract`: imports + semantics unchanged.\n- `v4_fallback_traces`, `plan_record_by_unit_id`, `section_alias_by_id`, `lookup_v4_all_judgments`: module-level shapes unchanged, lookups stay at call-site.\n- No new module introduced — three helpers added as same-file top-level private (blast radius = `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` only).\n- `git diff --stat` = `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py: +175 -108`, `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py: +72 -16` — matches Stage 3 Exit Report.\n\n■ Scope-qualified verification\n- \"22 passed\" axis = 4 targeted test files (IMP-05 v4_fallback, IMP-11 D-2 min_height, catalog invariant, family contract baseline).\n- \"408 passed\" axis = `tests/` recursive, all collected pytest cases.\n- \"11 PASS / 2 SKIP\" axis = smoke `--self-check`; 2 SKIPs documented as pre-existing fixture absence.\n- IMP-04 F17 calibration: covered by smoke 11/11 PASS axis (frame_render 11 partials green).\n\n■ 1 turn = 1 step\n- Stage 4 Round #1 only — no next-axis recommendation embedded. Decision = PASS, defer Codex Round #1 verification + commit/push to subsequent stages per workflow.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- Commands run :\n - `git diff --stat src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` → `+254 -113` (net +141, matches u1+u2+u3+u4+u5 expectation).\n - `git diff src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` — confirms u1/u2/u3 added at lines 2831-3000, u4 replaces inline loop body at 4620-4657, call-site lookups (`zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)`) retained.\n - `git diff tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` — confirms u5 renames `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` → `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (lines 298-372), Cases 1-6/8 untouched.\n - `python -m pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` → 22 passed in 0.16s.\n - `python -m pytest -q tests` → 408 passed in 50.35s.\n - `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check` → PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2.\n- Files checked :\n - `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2826-3000` (new helpers u1/u2/u3 with full docstrings + invariants).\n - `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4620-4657` (u4 call-site, per-index/per-id lookups retained).\n - `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:298-372` (u5 rewrite — 4 invariant axes asserted via direct helper call).\n - `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` — IMP-11 D-2 source-string guards still match helper body verbatim (no rewrite needed; u2 preserves literal lines).\n- Working-tree state vs HEAD `182aa7c47faafee6f9419d158dc3233a4fe30566` : 2 modified files (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`), 0 staged. No commit yet — Stage 4 verify precedes commit per workflow.\n- Verified facts :\n - All 5 implementation units (u1, u2, u3, u4, u5) present in working tree.\n - Helper output schema byte-identical to pre-IMP-32 inline dict (key set + key order + value identity + comment text).\n - IMP-05 Case 7 axis (candidate_evidence + fallback_chain + order + compat-alias comment) verified via direct call instead of literal source guard — verification scope strengthened, not weakened.\n - IMP-11 D-2 axis preserved literally in u2 helper body (source-string guards continue to pass).\n - No production behavior change.\n\ndecision: PASS\n\nsource_comment_ids: [Claude #9]\n\ncommit_sha: 182aa7c (Stage 4 verify against working-tree diff; no IMP-32 commit yet)\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:12:11+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:12:11+09:00"}, {"id": 22158, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22158", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #9] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 - IMP-32\n\nPASS\n\nScope checked:\n- Tracked change scope is limited to `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` and `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`.\n- The working tree has many unrelated untracked files; they were not included in this verification scope.\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` contains `_application_candidates_for_unit`, `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit`, and `_build_application_plan_unit`.\n- Step 9 call-site keeps `zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, and `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)` outside the helper.\n- Case 7 is now `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`, directly calling `_build_application_plan_unit`.\n- The active old Case 7 function `def test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` is absent from `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`.\n- IMP-11 D-2 markers remain present in production source: `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)`, `catalog_registered`, and the `min_height_px` chain.\n\nTest results:\n- Targeted suite: 22 passed in 0.62s.\n- Full suite: 408 passed in 49.11s.\n- Smoke self-check: PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2. The skipped fixtures were `app_sw_package_vs_solution` and `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`, both reported as `no bundled fixture`.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `git diff -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `rg -n \"def _application_candidates_for_unit|def _v4_all_judgments_for_unit|def _build_application_plan_unit|_build_application_plan_unit\\(\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py' | Select-Object -Skip 2829 -First 175`\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\\test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py' | Select-Object -Skip 294 -First 82`\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py' | Select-Object -Skip 4619 -First 41`\n- `pytest -q tests`\n- `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check`\n- `git diff --stat -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `rg -n \"test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|inspect\\.getsource\\(phase_z2_pipeline\\)|compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence|_contract = get_contract\\(c\\.template_id\\)|catalog_registered|min_height_px\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `git status --short -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `rg -n \"def test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|inspect\\.getsource\\(phase_z2_pipeline\\)\" tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `tests/test_catalog_invariant.py`\n- `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py`\n\nTest results:\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` -> `22 passed in 0.62s`.\n- `pytest -q tests` -> `408 passed in 49.11s`.\n- `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check` -> `PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2`.\n\nVerified facts:\n- Diff stat for scoped files is `2 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)`.\n- `_application_candidates_for_unit` is defined at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2831`.\n- `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` is defined at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2855`.\n- `_build_application_plan_unit` is defined at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2885` and called at `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:4645`.\n- The helper returns `candidate_evidence` before `fallback_chain`, and the `fallback_chain` line keeps `compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence`.\n- The rewritten Case 7 test asserts candidate evidence identity, fallback-chain identity, key order, and helper comment preservation.\n- The call-site still performs the per-index/per-id lookups before calling the helper.\n- No production schema change was found beyond the planned helper extraction and call-site replacement.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:15:05+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:15:05+09:00"}, {"id": 22165, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22165", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #10] Stage 5 commit-push — IMP-32 (#41) Round #1\n\n📌 **Stage 5: commit / push 완료**\n\n■ 핵심 결정\n- Stage 4 PASS verdict (Claude #9 / Codex #9 양측 PASS, targeted 22 / full 408 / smoke 11) 기준으로 단일 commit 생성 + dual-remote push 완료.\n- commit_sha = `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50` (`refactor(#41): IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan helper extraction (u1~u5)`).\n- staged 범위 = `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` + `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` 2 파일 한정. 다른 tracked 파일 변경 0. untracked working-tree 파일은 stage 미포함.\n- diff stat = `+254 / -113` (helper 3개 추가 + call-site 슬림화 + Case 7 helper-call 형식 재작성).\n- push 양측 (`origin` = GitHub `keimin86/design_agent`, `slide2` = Gitea `Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2`) `182aa7c..c412f1e` fast-forward 성공.\n\n■ 범위 제외\n- Step 6/7/8 input-shape / Step 10 frame_selection_evidence merge / output schema / key ordering / `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` / `get_contract` semantic / MDX 03/04/05 하드코딩 변경 0.\n- 신규 모듈 (`src/step9_application_plan.py` 등) 미생성 — same-file private helper 한정 (blast radius 최소).\n- IMP-11 D-2 source-string guard 별 axis : 본 commit 에서 `_contract` 단일 bind / `catalog_registered` / `min_height_px` chain 마커 유지 확인.\n\n■ 다음 단계\n- Stage 6 (final-close) 진입 GO 대기 — #41 close + IMP-05 (#5) Case 7 temporary source guard \"replaced\" tracker 상태 sync.\n- 후속 axis (Step 10 merge boundary review / Step 6/7/8 input-shape audit) = 별 axis / 별 turn (Stage 2 follow_up_candidates 보존).\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\n**commands_run**\n- `git status --short` → ` M src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` + ` M tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` (+ untracked 다수, 본 commit scope 외).\n- `git add src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` (specific 2 paths only, no wildcard).\n- `git diff --staged --stat` → 2 files, +254 / -113 (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` +283/112 net +170; `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` +84/16 net +68).\n- `git diff --staged -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` → matches Stage 4 u1~u4 (helper add at :2829-2995 + call-site slim at :4620-4658).\n- `git diff --staged -- tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` → matches Stage 4 u5 (Case 7 rewritten to `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`, SimpleNamespace duck-typed input, helper identity + key order + compat-alias scoped assertions).\n- `git commit -m \"refactor(#41): IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan helper extraction (u1~u5)\n...\"` (no `--no-verify`, no `--no-gpg-sign`) → `[main c412f1e]`.\n- `git push origin main` → `182aa7c..c412f1e main -> main`.\n- `git push slide2 main` → `182aa7c..c412f1e main -> main`.\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` → `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50\trefs/heads/main`.\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main` → `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50\trefs/heads/main`.\n- `git status --short --untracked-files=no` → empty (tracked working tree clean).\n\n**files_committed (2)**\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` (u1 `_application_candidates_for_unit` :2829-2853 + u2 `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit` :2855-2882 + u3 `_build_application_plan_unit` :2885-2995 + u4 call-site slim :4620-4658).\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py` (u5 Case 7 helper-call rewrite, IMP-05 Case 7 `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` literal guard → `inspect.getsource(_build_application_plan_unit)` scoped guard + 4-axis identity assertions).\n\n**commit_sha**: `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`\n**parent_sha**: `182aa7c47faafee6f9419d158dc3233a4fe30566` (Stage 1 baseline; `docs(#40): IMP-31 gate audit + activation reference cross-link`).\n**remote_state**:\n- `origin/main` = `c412f1ea` (fast-forward).\n- `slide2/main` = `c412f1ea` (fast-forward).\n\n**invariants_preserved (Stage 4 binding)**\n- application_plan per-unit dict key set + key order: byte-identical (u3 helper return literal mirrors prior inline `.append({...})`).\n- candidate_evidence ↔ fallback_chain list identity from `selection_trace[\"candidates\"]` (same object, not copy) + `# compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence` comment retained inside helper.\n- IMP-06 additive plan-aware fields (`position` / `assignment_source` / `section_assignment_override` / `replaced_auto_unit` / `skipped_collided_auto_units` / `skipped_reason`) → byte-identical absent overrides (None/False/[]).\n- IMP-11 D-2 markers preserved literally in `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit`: single `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)` bind, `catalog_registered` boolean, `min_height_px` chain `(_contract or {}).get(\"visual_hints\", {}).get(\"min_height_px\")`.\n- Call-site invariants outside helper: `zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(unit.source_section_ids[0], {})`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id.get(_first_sid)`, `lookup_v4_all_judgments(v4, _first_sid, alias_keys=...)`.\n\n**guardrails_respected**\n- Hook 우회 (`--no-verify` / `--no-gpg-sign`) 미사용.\n- `git add` specific paths only (no `-A`, no `.`).\n- single commit = single decision unit (IMP-32 helper extraction; u1~u5 모두 same scope-lock 내 동일 refactor axis).\n- AI isolation contract: commit 본문 / 헬퍼 / 테스트 모두 LLM 호출 0.\n- No-hardcoding: synthetic test 입력은 `SimpleNamespace` duck-typed, MDX 03/04/05 / catalog ID 하드코딩 0.\n- Sample budget: fresh first-encounter sample 미사용 (helper-call 직접 검증으로 충분).\n- `--no-edit` / `git rebase -i` / `git add -i` 미사용.\n\n**rollback_plan**: `git revert c412f1e` (single commit) + dual-remote re-push. 복원 시 Step 9 인라인 조립 + IMP-05 Case 7 `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` source-guard 형태로 회귀. Stage 1 baseline `182aa7c` 보존.\n\n**source_comment_ids**: Stage 4 binding = Claude #9 (PASS), Codex #9 (PASS, targeted 22 / full 408 / smoke 11). 본 Stage 5 = Claude #10.\n\nrewind_target: n/a (Stage 5 success, no rewind requested).\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:20:04+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:20:04+09:00"}, {"id": 22170, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22170", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #10] Stage 5 commit-push verification - IMP-32 (#41) Round #1\n\nDecision: PASS.\n\nI verified Claude #10's Stage 5 commit/push claims against the local repository and both remote branch tips. The committed scope is limited to the expected two files, the local HEAD is the reported commit, and both pushed remotes reflect the same commit SHA.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short --untracked-files=no`\n- `git rev-parse HEAD`\n- `git show --no-patch --format='%H%n%s%n%an <%ae>%n%ct' HEAD`\n- `git show --name-status --format= --stat HEAD`\n- `git show --stat --oneline --format=short HEAD`\n- `git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD`\n- `git remote -v`\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main`\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `.orchestrator/drafts/41_stage_commit-push_codex_r1.md`\n\nCommit SHA:\n- `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`\n\nVerified facts:\n- Local `HEAD` is `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`.\n- Commit subject is `refactor(#41): IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan helper extraction (u1~u5)`.\n- The committed file set is exactly `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` and `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`.\n- Commit stat is `2 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)`.\n- `git status --short --untracked-files=no` is empty, so there are no remaining tracked working-tree changes.\n- `origin` is `git@github.com:keimin86/design_agent.git`; `origin/main` resolves to `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`.\n- `slide2` is `https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2.git`; `slide2/main` resolves to `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`.\n- Push success is confirmed by both remote refs matching the local commit SHA.\n- No tests were run in this Stage 5 verification pass; Stage 4 already recorded the required targeted, full, and smoke verification, and the current task only required commit/push verification.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:21:50+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:21:50+09:00"}, {"id": 22173, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22173", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #11] Stage 6 final-close Round #1 — IMP-32 (#41)\n\n📌 **Stage 6: final-close — close decision**\n\n---\n\n## 1) Issue body re-read — review-loop checklist\n\n| item | status | evidence |\n|---|---|---|\n| Codex 1차 review | ✓ | Codex #1 (Stage 1), Codex #2 / Codex #3 (Stage 2) |\n| Claude 재검토 | ✓ | Claude #1, #3, #5/#7 unit reviews, #9 verify |\n| Codex 재검증 | ✓ | Codex #4~#8 per-unit verifications + Codex #9 Stage 4 PASS |\n| scope-locked | ✓ | Stage 2 EXIT REPORT scope_lock binding contract |\n| ready-for-implementation | ✓ | Stage 2 IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS u1~u5 |\n| implemented | ✓ | u1 (L2831), u2 (L2855), u3 (L2885), u4 (L4645 call-site), u5 (`test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` L301) |\n| verified | ✓ | Stage 4 dual-PASS: targeted 22 / full 408 / smoke 11 (Claude #9 + Codex #9) |\n\nAll seven loop boxes satisfied by binding Stage exit reports.\n\n---\n\n## 2) Commit verification on remotes\n\n```\nlocal HEAD = c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50\norigin/main = c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50 (GitHub keimin86/design_agent)\nslide2/main = c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50 (Gitea Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2)\nsubject = refactor(#41): IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan helper extraction (u1~u5)\ndiff stat = src/phase_z2_pipeline.py +283/-112, tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py +84/-16 (2 files, +254/-113)\ntracked tree = clean (git status --short --untracked-files=no = empty)\n```\n\n`git ls-remote` against both remotes ran in this stage; SHAs match local HEAD.\n\n---\n\n## 3) Goal vs result\n\n| goal (issue body) | delivered |\n|---|---|\n| extract `_build_application_plan_unit(unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, ...)` helper | `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2885` — exact 7-arg signature: `unit, zone_plan, selection_trace, plan_record, v4_all_for_unit, layout_preset, layout_candidates_list` |\n| no behavior change (pure refactor) | Stage 4 full pytest 408 passed / 0 fail; smoke 11 PASS / 2 pre-existing SKIP |\n| existing 10 IMP-05 tests + 2 catalog invariant tests green | Targeted 22 passed (Claude #9, Codex #9) |\n| smoke 11/11 green (IMP-04 F17 calibration intact) | PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2 (`app_sw_package_vs_solution`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked` — pre-existing baseline, not IMP-32 regression) |\n| Case 7 rewrite to `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` (helper-call form) | `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py:301` — old `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` symbol absent; 4 axes preserved (candidate_evidence list identity, fallback_chain alias identity, key order, compat-alias comment) |\n| Issue body anchor `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2687~` (stale) | Stage 1 corrected to actual span `:4451-4567`; helper now at `:2885-3000`, call-site at `:4620-4658` |\n\nScope_lock honored end-to-end: no Step 6/7/8 input-shape change, no Step 10 merge change, no output schema/key-order change, no `APPLICATION_MODE_BY_V4_LABEL` / `get_contract` semantic change, no new module, no MDX 03/04/05 hardcoding.\n\n---\n\n## 4) Follow-up links\n\n- **IMP-05 (#5) Case 7 temporary source guard** — `inspect.getsource(phase_z2_pipeline)` literal-string guard introduced at IMP-05 commit `23d1b25` is now retired. Suggest a single tracker comment on #5 noting \"Case 7 temporary source guard replaced by IMP-32 (#41) commit `c412f1e` — `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`.\"\n- **Step 10 frame_selection_evidence merge boundary review** — Stage 2 `follow_up_candidates`. Separate axis, separate turn.\n- **Step 6/7/8 input-shape audit** — Stage 2 `follow_up_candidates`. Separate axis, separate turn.\n- **IMP-11 D-2 source-string guards** — `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py` preserved as source-string form (Stage 2 default election); future axis to optionally migrate to direct helper-call form against `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit`. Not blocking.\n\nNo new follow-up issue drafted in this stage; above are notes only.\n\n---\n\n## 5) Labels\n\nCurrent: `needs-codex-review`.\n\nProposed transition on close:\n- Remove: `needs-codex-review`\n- Add: `scope-locked`, `ready-for-implementation`, `implemented`, `verified`\n\n(`closed` label is repo-defined but redundant with issue `state=closed`; will skip unless requested.)\n\n---\n\n## 6) Close decision\n\n**Recommend CLOSE.**\n\nRationale:\n- All five planned implementation units (u1~u5) complete and verified at Stage 4.\n- Single commit `c412f1e` lands on both `origin` and `slide2` at `main`.\n- All review-loop checkboxes from the issue body satisfied via binding Stage exit reports.\n- No unresolved questions inside IMP-32 scope. Two deferred axes (Step 10 merge, Step 6/7/8 input-shape) are explicitly out-of-scope per Stage 1/2 contracts.\n- IMP-05 (#5) Case 7 source-guard retirement is a tracker-comment task on #5, not a blocker for #41 closure.\n\nAwaiting Codex #11 verification before label transition + close API call.\n\n---\n\n## guardrails (Stage 6)\n\n- 1 turn = 1 step ([[feedback_one_step_per_turn]]): Stage 6 ends with close-recommend; no auto-advance to follow-up axes.\n- Scope-qualified verification ([[feedback_scope_qualified_verification]]): all PASS claims scoped to IMP-32 commit `c412f1e`.\n- Auto-pipeline first ([[feedback_auto_pipeline_first]]): no review_required gate introduced.\n- Factual verification ([[feedback_factual_verification]]): all SHAs, paths, line numbers verified inline this turn.\n- Don't uncritically accept ([[feedback_review_vs_go]]): close decision is a recommendation pending Codex #11 + user GO.\n\n## evidence\n\n```\ngit rev-parse HEAD → c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50\ngit log -1 --format=\"%H %s\" → c412f1e refactor(#41): IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan helper extraction (u1~u5)\ngit ls-remote origin refs/heads/main → c412f1ea... refs/heads/main\ngit ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main → c412f1ea... refs/heads/main\ngit show --stat c412f1e -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py\n → 2 files, +254/-113\ngit status --short --untracked-files=no → (empty)\nrg \"def _application_candidates_for_unit|def _v4_all_judgments_for_unit|def _build_application_plan_unit|_build_application_plan_unit\\(\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py\n → L2831, L2855, L2885, L4640 (comment), L4645 (call-site)\nrg \"def test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|def test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias\" tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py\n → L301 (new), old symbol absent\nGET /repos/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41 → state=open, labels=['needs-codex-review']\nGET /repos/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/labels → available: blocked|closed|implemented|needs-claude-review|needs-codex-review|ready-for-implementation|scope-locked|verified\n```\n\nsource_comment_ids: [Claude #11], pending [Codex #11].\n\ncommit_sha: c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50.\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:24:29+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:24:29+09:00"}, {"id": 22180, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41#issuecomment-22180", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/41", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #11] Stage 6 final-close verification IMP-32 (#41)\n\nFinal independent verification result: PASS. Close OK.\n\nVerified close criteria:\n- Local tracked tree is clean for committed files: `git status --short --untracked-files=no` returned empty.\n- Local HEAD is `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50` with subject `refactor(#41): IMP-32 Step 9 application_plan helper extraction (u1~u5)`.\n- `origin/main` and `slide2/main` both point to `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`.\n- Commit scope is limited to `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` and `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`, with stat `2 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)`.\n- `_application_candidates_for_unit`, `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit`, and `_build_application_plan_unit` are present in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`.\n- Step 9 call-site keeps `zone_region_plans[i]`, `v4_fallback_traces.get(...)`, `plan_record_by_unit_id.get(id(unit))`, `section_alias_by_id`, and `lookup_v4_all_judgments(...)` outside the helper.\n- `_build_application_plan_unit` has the planned seven input parameters: `unit`, `zone_plan`, `selection_trace`, `plan_record`, `v4_all_for_unit`, `layout_preset`, `layout_candidates_list`.\n- Case 7 is now `test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias`; old `test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias` is absent from the active test file.\n- Case 7 preserves the required axes: `candidate_evidence` identity, `fallback_chain` alias identity, key order, and `compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence` helper comment check.\n- IMP-11 D-2 source-string markers remain present in `_v4_all_judgments_for_unit`: `_contract = get_contract(c.template_id)`, `catalog_registered`, and the `min_height_px` chain.\n- Targeted verification passed: 22 passed.\n- Smoke self-check passed with the expected baseline fixture skips: PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2.\n- Full pytest was not rerun in Stage 6 per instruction not to run full pytest unless explicitly required; Stage 4 binding report already recorded full `pytest -q tests` as 408 passed.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short --untracked-files=no`\n- `git rev-parse HEAD`\n- `git show --no-patch --format='%H%n%s' HEAD`\n- `git show --stat --oneline --format='%H %s' HEAD -- src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main`\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main`\n- `rg -n \"def _application_candidates_for_unit|def _v4_all_judgments_for_unit|def _build_application_plan_unit|_build_application_plan_unit\\(\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `rg -n \"test_build_application_plan_unit_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|test_step9_production_emits_candidate_evidence_and_alias|candidate_evidence|fallback_chain|compat alias; prefer candidate_evidence|_contract = get_contract\\(c.template_id\\)|catalog_registered|min_height_px\" src/phase_z2_pipeline.py tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py' | Select-Object -Skip 2828 -First 175`\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py' | Select-Object -Skip 4620 -First 45`\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'tests\\test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py' | Select-Object -Skip 296 -First 80`\n- `git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r HEAD`\n- `pytest -q tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py tests/test_catalog_invariant.py tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`\n- `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`\n- `tests/test_phase_z2_step9_v4_all_judgments_min_height.py`\n- `tests/test_catalog_invariant.py`\n- `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`\n\nTest results:\n- Targeted: 22 passed in 0.59s.\n- Smoke: PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2 (`app_sw_package_vs_solution`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`, both no bundled fixture).\n- Full pytest: not rerun in Stage 6; Stage 4 binding report records 408 passed.\n\nCommit SHA:\n- `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`\n\nVerified facts:\n- Local HEAD, `origin/main`, and `slide2/main` all match `c412f1ea75085b2338aface13ddfdcda5240df50`.\n- Tracked working tree is clean.\n- Commit touched only `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` and `tests/test_phase_z2_v4_fallback.py`.\n- Helper extraction and call-site boundary match the Stage 2 scope lock.\n- Case 7 source guard was replaced by direct helper-call coverage without dropping the required evidence/alias/order/comment axes.\n- No final-close rewind target is required.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-21T03:26:29+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-21T03:26:29+09:00"}]