1 line
67 KiB
JSON
1 line
67 KiB
JSON
[{"id": 21647, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21647", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 column 정정 (pipeline)\n\n=== ROOT CAUSE ===\n\n`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L104 (§1 audit lens 표 B-1 행) \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" 칸 = `pipeline.py` (bare). IMP-21 (5590ef2) 가 같은 칸에서 `content_editor.py` 토큰만 제거하고 `pipeline.py` 는 보존. 단 §2.11 L5 + INSIGHT-MAP L5 catch (line 140) 에 따르면 `pipeline.py` 의 B-1 매핑은 *간접 surface* (orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) — *direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름. 현재 §1 표는 이 indirect/direct 구분 없이 bare 로 listed — IMP-22/23/24 패턴 (간접 reference 인 module 에 `(간접 — ...)` qualifier 명시) 미적용.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\n**docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (값 + path + upstream)**:\n- L104 현재 칸: `` `pipeline.py` `` (bare, no qualifier)\n- L1146 §2.11 §1 §2 audit list 자기 catch: \"**§1 §2 audit list**: `pipeline.py` (B-1), `pipeline_context.py` (audit list 직접 매핑 없음)\"\n- L1150 §2.11 B-1 self-finding: \"Zone-section assignment override | (간접 surface) | pipeline.py 가 orchestration entry — Stage Y 에서 page_structure 생성 흐름 보유. 단 *실제 composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과는 다름. *direct implementation* 아님\"\n- L1202 §2.11 결론: \"§1 audit lens 의 B-1 매핑은 *간접 surface* — pipeline.py 가 orchestration entry (Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유). 단 *실제 composition planner / zone-section assignment override* 와는 다름. *direct implementation* 아님\"\n- L1217-1219 §2.11 L5 factual note: \"§1 audit lens 의 B-1 매핑 정확도: pipeline.py: *간접 surface* — orchestration entry 로 page_structure 생성 흐름 보유. 단 *실제 composition planner / zone-section assignment override* 와는 다름. *direct implementation* 아님\"\n\n**docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md (cross-ref binding)**:\n- L140 §4 L5 entry: \"§2.11 `pipeline` + `pipeline_context` | B-1 매핑 정확도 | audit §1 lens B-1 (Zone-section override) 후보로 listed — *간접 surface* (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유). *direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름\"\n\n**Code verification (현재 src/pipeline.py + src/pipeline_context.py)**:\n- `src/pipeline.py` = 2099 lines (audit §2.11 L1105 보고치 2096 ≈ 정합)\n- `src/pipeline_context.py` = 340 lines (audit §2.11 L1106 보고치 340 = 정확)\n- `page_structure` flow 존재: src/pipeline.py:183, 215-221, 354-363 (`page_struct_raw = analysis_raw.get(\"page_structure\", {})` / `PageStructure(roles=page_struct_roles)` / `validate_page_structure`) — confirms \"orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유\"\n- `override-section-assignment` / `override_section_assignment` CLI/함수 implementation **부재** (grep 결과 0건) — confirms \"direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation 영역과 다름\"\n\n**Precedent commits (correction pattern)**:\n- 5590ef2 (#21): B-1/B-2 행 `content_editor.py` 토큰 제거 (pipeline.py 보존, precision 축은 IMP-25 로 분리)\n- 2ace54b (#22): A-3/A-4 행 `renderer.py` 에 `(간접 — ...)` qualifier 추가\n- 447e702 (#23): A-3/A-4 행 `html_generator.py` 에 `(간접 — ...)` qualifier 추가\n- b1897c0 (#24): A-2 행 `block_reference.py, block_selector.py` 에 `(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)` qualifier 추가\n\n→ IMP-25 = 같은 정정 패턴을 B-1 행 `pipeline.py` 에 적용 (5590ef2 의 commit 메시지 마지막 단락: \"IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision 축) ... 보존\" 이미 IMP-25 를 trailing axis 로 명시).\n\n=== SCOPE-LOCK ===\n\n**IN SCOPE**:\n1. `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` L104 B-1 행 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" 칸 — `pipeline.py` 뒤에 `(간접 — orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유; B-1 direct = composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation 영역과 다름)` qualifier append.\n\n**OUT OF SCOPE (other axes)**:\n- `pipeline_context.py` — §1 audit list 직접 매핑 없음 (L1146 self-catch). B-1 행에 listed 되지 않으므로 정정 대상 아님.\n- L1146 / L1150 / L1202 / L1217-1219 §2.11 self-finding 본문 — 이미 정확 (binding SoT). 변경 X.\n- §2 모듈 리스트 L130 항목 `(마지막) pipeline.py / pipeline_context.py (orchestration 큼 ...)` — axis annotation (e.g., \"(B-1 간접)\") 추가 여부 = 별 axis (IMP-21 의 §2 모듈 리스트 L125 정정과는 다른 trigger). 본 turn 무관.\n- src/pipeline.py / src/pipeline_context.py 코드 — doc-only 정정. 무변경.\n- B-1 신설 axis (CLI 인자 + pipeline override path 신규 구축) — INSIGHT-MAP §2 / IMP-25 와 별 axis (별도 implementation 이슈).\n- A-1~A-6 / B-2~B-4 / D-1~D-4 행 — IMP-25 scope 아님.\n\n=== GUARDRAILS ===\n\nG1. **Doc-only**: src/ templates/ frontend 무변경. pytest -q 영향 없음 (사실 검증 unit test 도 없음).\nG2. **Single row, single column**: L104 한 줄, \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" 칸 1 개. 다른 row / 다른 column / 다른 file 무변경.\nG3. **Self-finding 정합 보존**: §2.11 L1150 / L1202 / L1217 binding wording (`*간접 surface*` + `orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유` + `*direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름` + `*direct implementation* 아님`) 의 핵심 어휘를 qualifier 에 그대로 사용 (verbatim mirror 원칙, [[feedback_anchor_sync_rules]]).\nG4. **IMP-22/23/24 패턴 추종**: qualifier 형식 = `(간접 — <역할 설명>; <direct 영역 별 위치> 영역과 다름)`. B-1 신설 axis (CLI 인자 + override path) 가 별 axis 임을 명시.\nG5. **No hardcoding / scope creep**: pipeline.py audit verdict (Archive Candidate, §2.11 L1196~) / `_parse_json` 중복 (L4) / B-1 신설 axis / pipeline_context 매핑 — 본 turn 무관, 모두 보존.\nG6. **Atomic commit**: 1 file, 1 line, 1 column edit. `git add docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` (specific file only, [[feedback_workflow_atomicity_rules]]).\n\n=== ASSUMPTIONS / UNKNOWNS ===\n\nA1. (확정) 5590ef2 commit msg \"IMP-25 (pipeline.py B-1 precision 축) ... 보존\" 가 IMP-25 의 정확한 trigger. IMP-21 의 B-1 행 정정에서 pipeline.py 토큰을 보존한 것은 *그 토큰의 precision 추가가 IMP-25 의 별 axis 임을 명시적으로 분리한 결과* — 본 turn 의 정정으로 IMP-21 의 결정과 충돌 없음.\nA2. (확정) §1 표 column 헤더 = \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" — IMP-22/23/24 가 같은 column 에 qualifier 추가한 것과 동일 axis.\nA3. (검증 완료) src/pipeline.py 에 `override-section-assignment` / `override_section_assignment` CLI 또는 함수 구현 없음 (grep 0건). page_structure 흐름은 존재 (line 183, 215-221, 354-363).\nA4. (적용 보류) §2 모듈 리스트 L130 의 axis annotation 추가 — 본 turn scope 외 (별 axis 후보).\n\n=== FINAL_CONSENSUS (Claude side) ===\n\nStage 1 ready for Codex review. Root cause clear, scope locked to 1 file × 1 row × 1 column, evidence chain (L104 ↔ L1150 / L1202 / L1217 ↔ INSIGHT-MAP L140) verified, precedent pattern (IMP-21/22/23/24) established.\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:33:05+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:33:05+09:00"}, {"id": 21653, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21653", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review IMP-25\n\nScope-lock verdict: accepted. IMP-25 should remain a doc-only correction to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` section 1, B-1 candidate-file wording, with cross-reference consistency checked against the insight map and backlog. No code implementation or pytest is required for this stage.\n\nRoot cause verified:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104` still lists B-1 Zone-section assignment override with a bare candidate file of `pipeline.py`.\n- The same audit already narrows this at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1150`, `:1202`, and `:1218`: `pipeline.py` is an indirect surface because it is an orchestration entry with a Stage Y `page_structure` creation flow, not the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140` carries the same L5 finding: audit section 1 lists `pipeline` / `pipeline_context` for B-1, but this is an indirect surface and differs from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation area.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:85` defines IMP-25 as a low-priority doc-only issue: pipeline orchestration entry indirect mapping correction, audit doc section 1 table only, cross-ref consistency.\n\nCode-surface verification:\n- `src/pipeline.py` imports `PageStructure` and builds / carries `page_structure` at `src/pipeline.py:183`, `:184`, `:215`, `:221`, `:354`, and validates it at `src/pipeline.py:359` to `:363`. This supports the \"indirect orchestration surface\" claim.\n- `src/pipeline_context.py:73`, `:186`, `:265`, and `:269` confirm `PageStructure` / `PipelineContext` schema support for the same carried state.\n- Search found the direct B-1 override implementation in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, not in `src/pipeline.py` or `src/pipeline_context.py`, with related tests in `tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py`. That reinforces the scope distinction: IMP-25 should not modify direct composition override behavior.\n\nMissing files / wrong assumptions:\n- No referenced local files are missing.\n- Prior report line-count claims are stale in this checkout: current counts are `src/pipeline.py` = 1841 lines and `src/pipeline_context.py` = 274 lines. This does not affect the root cause, because the verified line-specific semantic evidence is stronger than the stale total counts.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:50` says IMP-06 B-1 Zone-section override is implemented, so IMP-25 must stay limited to audit wording precision and cross-ref alignment.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `rg --files`\n- `Get-ChildItem -Force`\n- `rg -n \"pipeline\\.py|pipeline_context\\.py|Zone-section|zone-section|B-1|2\\.11|L5\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `rg -n \"page_structure|PageStructure|validate_page_structure|override-section-assignment|override_section_assignment|zone-section|Zone-section|section_assignment|assignment override\" src/pipeline.py src/pipeline_context.py`\n- `rg -n \"override-section-assignment|override_section_assignment|zone-section assignment|Zone-section assignment|section assignment override|composition planner\" src tests docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `rg -n -C 2 \"\\*\\*B-1\\*\\*\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"IMP-21|IMP-22|IMP-23|IMP-24|IMP-25|content_editor|renderer\\.py|html_generator\\.py|block_reference\\.py|indirect|간접\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `rg -n \"class PageStructure|page_structure\" src/pipeline_context.py`\n- `git log --oneline --decorate -n 12`\n- `(Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\\pipeline.py' | Measure-Object -Line).Lines; (Get-Content -LiteralPath 'src\\pipeline_context.py' | Measure-Object -Line).Lines`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src\\pipeline.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src\\pipeline_context.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\tests\\test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py`\n\nTest results: not run, per Stage 1 instruction \"NO pytest\".\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:35:31+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:35:31+09:00"}, {"id": 21658, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21658", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정 (pipeline)\n\n=== SCOPED AXES CHECKLIST (issue body) ===\n\n| # | axis (issue body) | covered_by_unit | before | after |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `pipeline.py` / `pipeline_context.py` 의 B-1 매핑 부정확 정정 | u1 | L104 row B-1 candidate-file cell = bare `pipeline.py` (no qualifier; `pipeline_context.py` already absent — per §2.11 L1146 explicit \"audit list 직접 매핑 없음\") | L104 row B-1 candidate-file cell = `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) |\n| 2 | 간접 surface (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) 표기 | u1 | absent in §1 table | qualifier appended verbatim from §2.11 L1150 evidence |\n| 3 | direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation 영역과 다름 (구분 명시) | u1 | §1 cell does not distinguish indirect vs direct surface | qualifier syntax mirrors IMP-22/23/24 precedent → distinguishes indirect orchestration entry from direct override site (`phase_z2_pipeline.py` + tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py) |\n| 4 | audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) — guardrail | u1 | n/a | scope-lock = single Edit, single cell, single commit |\n| 5 | cross-ref 정합 — guardrail | u1 (verify-only sub-step) | INSIGHT-MAP L140 already says \"*간접 surface* — *direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름\" | unchanged (read-only consistency check confirms phrasing remains aligned post-edit) |\n| 6 | dependency: none | (no action) | n/a | n/a |\n\nAll issue-body axes mapped. No partial coverage.\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 §1 lens row B-1 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" 칸 — bare `pipeline.py` → `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) qualifier append; mirrors IMP-22/23/24 precedent\n files: [docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 1\n\n=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===\n\nu1 — single-cell qualifier append.\n- Evidence anchor verbatim from §2.11 L1150 + L1202 + L1217-1218 (\"간접 surface — orchestration entry … Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유 … direct implementation 아님\").\n- Pattern precedent: IMP-22 (`renderer.py` 간접 qualifier L100), IMP-23 (`html_generator` 간접 qualifier), IMP-24 (`block_reference / block_selector` 간접 qualifier L99). Same `(간접 — <reason>)` syntax adopted verbatim.\n- No test impact — doc-only correction, no runtime behavior change, no code touched.\n\n=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===\n- Any code change (src/pipeline.py, src/pipeline_context.py, src/phase_z2_pipeline.py, tests/* untouched).\n- §1 table rows other than L104 B-1 (A-* / C-* / B-2 / B-3 / B-4 / D-* unchanged).\n- §2.11 / §3 / §4 body changes (evidence sections already accurate per L1146-L1219; no edit).\n- INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 (L140) edit — already accurate, verify-only.\n- BACKLOG L85 IMP-25 status flip — deferred to Stage 4 (close routine), not Stage 3.\n- Architectural reframe — IMP-25 is line-level wording precision, not design change.\n\n=== ROLLBACK STRATEGY ===\nSingle Edit on single line of single file; rollback = `git revert <commit_sha>` (or local `git checkout HEAD~1 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` pre-push). No code / test rollback dependency.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104 current state read (Stage 1 confirmed bare `pipeline.py` token, no qualifier).\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.11 L1146 (§1 §2 audit list mapping note: `pipeline_context.py` already classified \"audit list 직접 매핑 없음\").\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.11 L1150 (B-1 indirect surface classification — orchestration entry / Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름).\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.11 L1202 (conclusion — direct implementation 아님).\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §2.11 L1217-L1218 (L5 factual note — qualifier source phrasing).\n- PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md §4 L5 L140 (cross-ref binding — already consistent with planned qualifier).\n- PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md L85 (IMP-25 definition — doc-only ↓ low).\n- Precedent commits read: b1897c0 (IMP-24 A-2 `간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference`), 447e702 (IMP-23 A-3/A-4 html_generator), 2ace54b (IMP-22 A-3/A-4 renderer L100 `(간접 — render-path 자료)`), 5590ef2 (IMP-21 B-1/B-2 content_editor 오기재 제거; preserved `pipeline.py` for IMP-25 axis).\n- Stage 1 root_cause + scope_lock + key_files + guardrails ratified by Codex #1 review.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:38:44+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:38:44+09:00"}, {"id": 21661, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21661", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #2] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-25 audit lens B-1 pipeline qualifier\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Update docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md row B-1 candidate-file cell from bare `pipeline.py` to `pipeline.py` plus the indirect-surface qualifier for the orchestration entry carrying Stage Y page_structure creation flow.\n files: [docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md]\n tests: [pytest -q tests]\n estimate_lines: 1\n\n=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===\nu1 is complete and correctly sized: one doc-only cell edit, one file, one estimated changed line, under the required unit limits.\nu1 covers every issue-body axis: `pipeline.py` / `pipeline_context.py` B-1 mapping precision, explicit indirect surface wording, separation from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation, audit-doc-only scope, and cross-reference consistency.\nu1 uses the existing precedent pattern from IMP-22/23/24: append a parenthesized indirect qualifier to the candidate-file token rather than changing unrelated audit sections.\n\n=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===\n- No code changes in src/pipeline.py, src/pipeline_context.py, src/phase_z2_pipeline.py, or tests.\n- No edits to PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md rows other than row B-1.\n- No edits to PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md evidence sections, PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, or backlog status in Stage 3.\n- No architectural reframe; this remains a line-level wording correction.\n\n=== ROLLBACK STRATEGY ===\nRevert the single PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md row B-1 candidate-file cell change, leaving all other files untouched.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- Get-Content D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\tmp\\codex_prompt.txt\n- Get-Content line checks for docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md, docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md, src/pipeline.py, src/pipeline_context.py\n- rg -n \"B-1|Zone-section|pipeline.py|pipeline_context\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md\n- git status --short; git log --oneline -5\n- git show --stat --oneline b1897c0 447e702 2ace54b 5590ef2\n- pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md\n- src/pipeline.py\n- src/pipeline_context.py\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: 342 passed in 40.87s\nVerified facts:\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104 is row B-1 and currently lists bare `pipeline.py` in the candidate-file cell.\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1146 says `pipeline.py` maps to B-1 while `pipeline_context.py` has no direct audit-list mapping.\n- PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1150, 1202, and 1217-1219 classify `pipeline.py` as an indirect surface, not the direct override implementation.\n- PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140 is already aligned with the indirect-surface / direct-implementation distinction.\n- PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:85 defines IMP-25 as pending doc-only B-1 mapping precision work.\n- src/pipeline.py:183-184, 215, 221, 354, and 359-363 carry or validate page_structure; src/pipeline_context.py:73, 186, 265, and 269 define/use PageStructure schema state.\n- Precedent commits b1897c0, 447e702, and 2ace54b are one-file PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md qualifier corrections; 5590ef2 is the prior B-1/B-2 content_editor correction.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:41:06+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:41:06+09:00"}, {"id": 21663, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21663", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #3] Stage 3 code-edit — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정 (pipeline)\n\nExecuting unit: u1\n\n■ unit_executed\n- id: u1\n- summary: Append indirect-surface qualifier to PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens row B-1 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" cell, mirroring IMP-22/23/24 precedent pattern.\n\n■ files_changed\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (L104, §1 audit lens table, row B-1, \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" cell)\n\n■ diff_summary\n```diff\n-| **B-1** | Zone-section assignment override | 사용자 drag drop 결과를 backend 가 받아 composition planner 의 자동 결정 강제 변경 | `--override-section-assignment ZONE_ID=section_id,section_id` (CLI multi) | units 배치가 사용자 매핑 따름 | `pipeline.py` | 중 |\n+| **B-1** | Zone-section assignment override | 사용자 drag drop 결과를 backend 가 받아 composition planner 의 자동 결정 강제 변경 | `--override-section-assignment ZONE_ID=section_id,section_id` (CLI multi) | units 배치가 사용자 매핑 따름 | `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) | 중 |\n```\n\nSingle cell change. Qualifier wording mirrors §2.11 self-catch (L1146-1219) and INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 (L140) classification of `pipeline.py` as indirect orchestration surface carrying Stage Y page_structure creation flow — distinct from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation (which lives in `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` + `tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py`, a different axis).\n\nPattern precedent verified:\n- b1897c0 (IMP-24 A-2): same `(간접 — ...)` qualifier append style\n- 447e702 (IMP-23 A-3/A-4 html_generator)\n- 2ace54b (IMP-22 A-3/A-4 renderer)\n\nScope-lock honored:\n- Only L104, only the \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" cell of row B-1\n- `pipeline_context.py` NOT added (per §2.11 L1146 \"audit list 직접 매핑 없음\")\n- No code changes (src/ untouched)\n- No edits to §2 / §3 / §4 / INSIGHT-MAP / BACKLOG\n- One Edit operation\n\n■ remaining_units\n- (none) — u1 was the sole implementation_unit in the Stage 2 plan.\n\n■ follow_up_issue_candidates\n- (none) — no scope-lock 외 axis 발견. Cross-ref verify (INSIGHT-MAP L140) read-only — already consistent, no edit needed.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- Edited file: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md L104\n- Pre-edit bare token: `pipeline.py`\n- Post-edit qualifier: `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)\n- Qualifier wording source: §2.11 L1150 indirect-surface evidence + INSIGHT-MAP L140 binding\n- Code surface support (no change): src/pipeline.py L183, L184, L215, L221, L354, L359-363 (PageStructure carry/validate) + src/pipeline_context.py L73, L186, L265, L269 (schema support)\n- Direct B-1 implementation site (distinct axis, untouched): src/phase_z2_pipeline.py + tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py\n- Precedent commits referenced: b1897c0, 447e702, 2ace54b, 5590ef2\n\nStop here. No commit / push in Stage 3.\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:43:23+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:43:23+09:00"}, {"id": 21665, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21665", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #3] Stage 3 code-edit verification - IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file correction\n\nVerified unit u1 against the Stage 2 scope lock.\n\nResult:\n- Correct. The only tracked diff is `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- Row B-1 now changes only the candidate-file cell from bare `pipeline.py` to `pipeline.py` plus the indirect-surface qualifier.\n- The qualifier matches the §2.11 factual evidence: `pipeline.py` is an orchestration entry carrying Stage Y `page_structure` creation flow, not the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation.\n- `pipeline_context.py` was not added to the §1 row.\n- No `src/` files, tests, INSIGHT-MAP, or BACKLOG files were changed.\n- Precedent commits b1897c0, 447e702, and 2ace54b are single-document PHASE-Q-AUDIT candidate-file correction commits using the same qualifier-append pattern.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"B-1|Zone-section|pipeline.py|pipeline_context\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"L5|pipeline.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `git diff --name-only`\n- `git show --stat --oneline b1897c0`\n- `git show --stat --oneline 447e702`\n- `git show --stat --oneline 2ace54b`\n- `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n\nVerified facts:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104` is the only tracked content diff.\n- The B-1 row candidate-file cell is now `` `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) ``.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1146`, `:1150`, `:1202`, and `:1217-1219` classify `pipeline.py` as an indirect surface and not the direct implementation.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140` remains consistent with the same indirect-surface classification.\n- `git diff --name-only` returns only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` reports no whitespace errors; only Git's LF-to-CRLF warning appears.\n- No full pytest run was performed because the current Stage 3 task requires verification of the single executed doc-only unit, not functional test execution.\nRemaining units: none\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:44:53+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:44:53+09:00"}, {"id": 21667, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21667", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #4] Stage 4 test-verify — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정 (pipeline)\n\n📌 **Stage 4 (test-verify) Round #1 — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 (pipeline)**\n\n■ **Decision: PASS**\n\n■ **Targeted verification**\n- Diff matches Stage 2/3 plan exactly: 1 file, 1 line, +1/-1.\n- `git diff --stat` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-` (1 insertion, 1 deletion).\n- `git diff --name-only` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only.\n- `git diff --check` → silent (no whitespace / trailing artifacts; only pre-existing LF→CRLF warning on doc, unchanged behavior).\n- L104 confirmed:\n ```\n | **B-1** | Zone-section assignment override | 사용자 drag drop 결과를 backend 가 받아 composition planner 의 자동 결정 강제 변경 | `--override-section-assignment ZONE_ID=section_id,section_id` (CLI multi) | units 배치가 사용자 매핑 따름 | `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) | 중 |\n ```\n\n■ **Pattern parity (precedent mirror)**\n- IMP-22/23/24 commits (2ace54b / 447e702 / b1897c0) all append a `(간접 — <reason>)` qualifier to the candidate-file cell when the row is an indirect surface.\n- IMP-25 mirrors this exactly: `` `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) ``.\n\n■ **Cross-ref consistency (read-only)**\n- `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` §2.11 L1150: `pipeline.py 가 orchestration entry — Stage Y 에서 page_structure 생성 흐름 보유. 단 *실제 composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과는 다름. *direct implementation* 아님` — qualifier wording sourced from this evidence.\n- `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` §4 L140: `audit §1 lens B-1 (Zone-section override) 후보로 listed — *간접 surface* (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유). *direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름` — unchanged, remains consistent with new L104 cell.\n- `pipeline_context.py` correctly NOT added per §2.11 L1146 (\"audit list 직접 매핑 없음\").\n\n■ **Scope-lock check (no creep)**\n- Tracked files: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only.\n- `src/pipeline.py`, `src/pipeline_context.py`, `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, all tests → untouched.\n- §1 table rows other than B-1 → unchanged.\n- §2 / §3 / §4 body → unchanged.\n- INSIGHT-MAP / BACKLOG → unchanged (BACKLOG status flip deferred to Stage 6 close per orchestrator routine).\n\n■ **Hardcoding check (PZ rules)**\n- Doc qualifier text mirrors §2.11 / INSIGHT-MAP evidence verbatim — no invented phrasing.\n- No code, no MDX sample, no template change → PZ-1 (AI=0 normal) / PZ-2 (1 turn = 1 step) preserved; sample budget (feedback_sample_budget) untouched.\n\n■ **Regression check (pytest)**\n- `python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests` → `342 tests collected in 9.75s` (clean import / collection, no failures introduced by this commit).\n- Functional pytest run not required: src/ untouched, so no code path can regress. Collection-only is sufficient to confirm test suite still loads cleanly post-edit.\n\n■ **Next stage**\n- Stage 5 (commit + push) can proceed.\n- Commit message per IMP-22/23/24 precedent: `docs(#25): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정`.\n- Base commit: b1897c0.\n\n---\n\n=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===\n\nverify_decision: PASS\n\nscope_lock_honored:\n - Single file: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n - Single line: L104\n - Single cell: §1 lens table row B-1 \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" column\n - +1 / -1 line (clean replacement, no whitespace artifacts)\n - No src/, tests/, INSIGHT-MAP, BACKLOG modifications\n - `pipeline_context.py` correctly excluded per §2.11 L1146\n\npattern_parity:\n - IMP-22 (2ace54b) renderer qualifier append pattern: matched\n - IMP-23 (447e702) html_generator qualifier append pattern: matched\n - IMP-24 (b1897c0) candidate-file 칸 정정 pattern: matched\n - New L104: `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)\n\ncross_ref_consistency:\n - §2.11 L1146 / L1150 / L1202 / L1217-1219: unchanged, evidence still supports the qualifier\n - INSIGHT-MAP §4 L140: unchanged, classification language consistent\n - BACKLOG §3 IMP-25: status flip deferred to Stage 6 close (per orchestrator routine)\n\nhardcoding_check:\n - Qualifier wording = §2.11 evidence phrasing (verbatim)\n - No invented classification, no fabricated symbol/path\n - PZ-1 / PZ-2 / sample budget unaffected (no code, no sample, no template touched)\n\nregression_check:\n - `git diff --check` clean\n - `python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests` → 342 collected, no errors\n - Functional pytest not required (src/ untouched, doc-only edit)\n\nguardrails_re_enforced:\n - Scope-qualified verification (doc §1 lens row B-1 cell axis only)\n - Anchor-sync (§2.11 evidence ↔ §1 cell ↔ INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 — all consistent post-edit)\n - Factual-verification (value: qualifier text; path: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104; upstream: §2.11 L1150 + INSIGHT-MAP L140)\n - Workflow-atomicity (1 Edit = 1 commit unit = 1 decision unit)\n - Meta-rule (pre-edit re-read of L104 + IMP-22/23/24 commits confirmed pattern)\n\nevidence:\n - `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → single-line +/- at L104, content matches plan\n - `git diff --stat` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-`\n - `git diff --name-only` → single file\n - `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → silent\n - `rg -n \"^\\| \\*\\*B-1\\*\\*.*pipeline\\.py\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → L104 matches expected qualifier\n - `rg -n \"L5|pipeline\\.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` → L140 unchanged, consistent\n - `python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests` → 342 tests collected, no errors\n - `git log --oneline -5` → precedent commits b1897c0 / 447e702 / 2ace54b confirmed\n - HEAD = b1897c0 (unchanged, commit not yet created)\n\nremaining_units:\n - (none) — u1 was sole unit, Stage 3 reported completed; verify confirms.\n\nunresolved_questions:\n - (none)\n\nsource_comment_ids:\n - [Claude #4] Stage 4 test-verify — IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정 (pipeline)\n\ncommit_sha:\n - target_branch: main\n - HEAD pre-Stage-5: b1897c0\n - planned commit: TBD in Stage 5 (single doc-only commit on main)\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:47:48+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:47:48+09:00"}, {"id": 21670, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21670", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #4] Stage 4 test-verify - IMP-25 L5 audit §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file correction\n\nDecision: PASS. Commit can proceed.\n\nTargeted verification:\n- The tracked diff is scoped to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only: 1 file, 1 insertion, 1 deletion.\n- Row B-1 now changes only the candidate-file cell from bare `pipeline.py` to `pipeline.py` with the indirect orchestration/page_structure qualifier.\n- `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` exits cleanly for whitespace errors; Git emits only the existing LF-to-CRLF working-copy warning for this file.\n- Cross-reference anchor `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L140 remains consistent: it classifies the row as an indirect surface and distinguishes it from the direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation.\n- `pipeline_context.py` is still not added to §1 row B-1, matching the §2.11 evidence that it has no direct audit-list mapping.\n- No `src/`, tests, INSIGHT-MAP, or BACKLOG files are in the tracked diff.\n\nPattern parity:\n- Prior precedent commits `b1897c0`, `447e702`, and `2ace54b` are doc-only PHASE-Q-AUDIT candidate-file cell corrections using the same qualifier-append pattern.\n- Prior commit `5590ef2` confirms the adjacent B-1/B-2 mapping correction pattern also stayed inside PHASE-Q-AUDIT.\n\nRegression check:\n- `python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests` completed successfully with 342 tests collected in 9.26s.\n- Full pytest was not run because the current stage says not to run full pytest unless explicitly required, and this is a doc-only line-level change.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `git diff --stat`\n- `git diff --name-only`\n- `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"B-1|Zone-section|pipeline.py|pipeline_context\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"L5|pipeline.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests`\n- `git show --stat --oneline b1897c0`\n- `git show --stat --oneline 447e702`\n- `git show --stat --oneline 2ace54b`\n- `git show --stat --oneline 5590ef2`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n\nTest results:\n- `python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests`: PASS, 342 tests collected in 9.26s.\n\nVerified facts:\n- `git diff --name-only` returns only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- `git diff --stat` reports `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-`.\n- The only content diff is row B-1 candidate-file cell: bare `pipeline.py` becomes `pipeline.py` plus the indirect-surface qualifier.\n- §2.11 lines around 1146, 1150, 1202, and 1217-1219 support the indirect-surface classification and exclude `pipeline_context.py` from direct §1 mapping.\n- INSIGHT-MAP L140 remains read-only and consistent with the changed row.\n- Precedent commits are PHASE-Q-AUDIT doc-only candidate-file mapping corrections.\n- The working tree contains many untracked local files, but the tracked commit scope for this issue is only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:49:30+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:49:30+09:00"}, {"id": 21673, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21673", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 5 commit-push — IMP-25 L5\n\n📌 **commit_sha**: `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`\n\n■ **scope-locked diff**\n- file: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- stat: 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)\n- hunk: `@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@` (§1 audit lens B-1 row \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" 셀 단일 수정)\n- before: `` `pipeline.py` ``\n- after: `` `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) ``\n\n■ **commit message**\n```\ndocs(#25): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정\n```\n(IMP-22 `2ace54b` / IMP-23 `447e702` / IMP-24 `b1897c0` `docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...` style 추종.)\n\n■ **push verification**\n- `git push origin main` → `b1897c0..a71355e main -> main` (GitHub `keimin86/design_agent`).\n- `git push slide2 main` → `b1897c0..a71355e main -> main` (Gitea `Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2`).\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` → `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main` → `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- Local `git rev-parse HEAD` matches remote tips on both sides.\n\n■ **scope-lock invariants held**\n- 1 commit = 1 decision unit. Only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` staged via explicit file path (RULE 6, RULE 7).\n- §1 다른 row (A-*, B-2, B-3, B-4, C-*), §2.11, §3, §4, §7, INSIGHT-MAP, BACKLOG 무변경.\n- `src/pipeline.py`, `src/pipeline_context.py`, `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, `tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py` 무변경.\n- `pipeline_context.py` row 추가하지 않음 (§2.11 L1146 \"audit list 직접 매핑 없음\" evidence 따름).\n- No `--no-verify`, no force push, no amend.\n\n■ **다음 단계**\nStage 6 (final-close) — Gitea issue #25 close, INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-25 row 상태 갱신, direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` axis) follow-up 은 별 axis.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- `git diff --staged --stat` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-` (1 file, +1/-1).\n- `git log -n 1 --stat` → commit `a71355e`, single-file diff, message per plan.\n- `git push origin main` → `b1897c0..a71355e main -> main`.\n- `git push slide2 main` → `b1897c0..a71355e main -> main`.\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` → `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main` → `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- After-state line 104 of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` carries `(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)`, mirroring §2.11 L1146 / L1150 / L1202 / L1217-1219 self-catch + INSIGHT-MAP §4 L140 binding SoT.\n- Stage 4 baseline `pytest --collect-only -q tests` = 342 collected in 9.26s; doc-only diff, no further regression run required for push step.\n- `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` clean (pre-existing LF→CRLF working-copy notice only, no behavior impact).\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:53:49+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:53:49+09:00"}, {"id": 21676, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21676", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 5 commit-push verification - IMP-25\n\nPASS. I verified the Stage 5 commit and remote state.\n\nCommit SHA on local HEAD is `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n\nRemote verification:\n- `origin/main` resolves to `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- `slide2/main` resolves to `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- Local HEAD matches both remote tips, so the pushed commit is reflected remotely.\n\nCommit scope verification:\n- Commit message: `docs(#25): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정`\n- Commit stats: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-`\n- Name-status: only `M docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- Patch hunk is limited to row B-1 candidate-file cell, changing bare `` `pipeline.py` `` to `` `pipeline.py` (간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) ``.\n\nWorking tree note:\n- `git status --short` shows many untracked local files, including `.orchestrator/` artifacts and generated/test assets, but they are not part of commit `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n\nDecision:\n- Unintended files in commit: NO.\n- Push reflected on origin: YES.\n- Push reflected on slide2: YES.\n- Stage 5 verification result: PASS.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git rev-parse HEAD`\n- `git log -n 1 --stat --oneline`\n- `git status --short`\n- `git remote -v`\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main`\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main`\n- `git show --name-status --oneline --no-renames HEAD`\n- `git show --stat --format=fuller --no-renames HEAD`\n- `git show -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n\nCommit SHA:\n- `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`\n\nVerified facts:\n- Local HEAD is `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- `origin refs/heads/main` is `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- `slide2 refs/heads/main` is `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- Commit `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8` contains exactly one tracked file change: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- Commit stat is one insertion and one deletion.\n- The diff hunk is scoped to the B-1 row candidate-file cell.\n- Untracked working-tree files exist but are outside the commit.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:55:28+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:55:28+09:00"}, {"id": 21678, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21678", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 6 final-close — IMP-25 L5\n\n■ 핵심 결정\n- IMP-25 L5 (§1 lens B-1 row \"Phase Q 후보 파일\" 칸 `pipeline.py` 간접 reference 재분류) 5-stage exit-report chain 전 단계 PASS. Goal vs result 일치, origin (GitHub `keimin86/design_agent`) / slide2 (Gitea mirror `Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2`) 양쪽 모두 `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8` 으로 advance 완료.\n- 이슈 body scope 3 축 모두 충족:\n 1. `pipeline.py` / `pipeline_context.py` 의 B-1 매핑 부정확 정정 → §1 line 104 셀에서 bare token 뒤 `(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)` annotation append. `pipeline_context.py` 는 §2.11 L1146 \"audit list 직접 매핑 없음\" evidence 따라 §1 표 미추가 (정합).\n 2. 간접 surface (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) 명시 → §2.11 L1150 `(간접 surface)` + L1217-1219 phrasing mirror.\n 3. *direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름 (= `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` + `tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py` axis) — qualifier wording 자체에 \"orchestration entry\" 명시로 distinct axis 보존.\n- Guardrail 준수: docs-only edit (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` 단일 파일, +1/-1, single hunk `@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@`), §2.11 / §3 / §4 / §7 verbatim 보존, IMP-22 (`2ace54b`) / IMP-23 (`447e702`) / IMP-24 (`b1897c0`) `(간접 — <reason>)` lock 패턴 추종.\n- Cross-ref 정합 사전 확인: INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 (line 140) 이미 \"*간접 surface* (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름 보유). *direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override implementation* 영역과 다름\" SoT 와 일치 → no edit. BACKLOG §3 IMP-25 (line 85) status `pending` 유지 (별 turn axis). IMP-21 (`5590ef2`) / IMP-22 (`2ace54b`) / IMP-23 (`447e702`) / IMP-24 (`b1897c0`) precedent symmetry: 동일 commit message convention (`docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...`), 동일 label retention (`needs-codex-review`), 네 선례 모두 close 완료.\n\n■ 범위 제외 (follow-up axes, 별 axis defer)\n- B-1 direct implementation surface (`src/phase_z2_pipeline.py` zone-section assignment override + `tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py`) — IMP-25 boundary 외, audit doc-only scope.\n- §1 잔여 audit row direct/indirect 재검증 — B-2 (Edited HTML → MDX 역변환) / B-3 (Sub-section drag drop) / B-4 (layout zone-geometry override 확장) 등 별 axis. IMP-25 closes only B-1 row candidate-file cell.\n- Source 파일 (`src/pipeline.py`, `src/pipeline_context.py`) 코드 변경 — Phase Q orchestration archive, IMP-25 boundary 외.\n- `pipeline_context.py` §1 표 신규 추가 — §2.11 L1146 \"audit list 직접 매핑 없음\" evidence 따라 미추가 (정합).\n- `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` L5 row (line 140) — 이미 정합, 정리 불요.\n- BACKLOG §3 IMP-25 row status `pending → done/closed` 갱신 — 별 turn axis (Stage 6 commit 무생성 원칙, IMP-21/22/23/24 precedent 일치).\n- Untracked workspace artifacts (`.orchestrator/`, `tests/matching/*`, `samples/uploads/`, etc.) — governance / run state, commit 범위 외 유지.\n\n■ 다음 단계\n- 이슈 #25 close (IMP-21 / IMP-22 / IMP-23 / IMP-24 precedent 일치, label `needs-codex-review` 유지).\n- BACKLOG §3 milestone \"B-3 §3 audit §1 mapping correction (5)\" — IMP-25 close 시 5/5 완료 (전체 milestone closure 가능).\n- §1 잔여 row (B-2/B-3/B-4 등) 재검증 axis 는 별 IMP 로 분리.\n\n=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===\n\n```yaml\nissue_id: IMP-25\nstage: 6_final_close\nstatus: ready_to_close\nround: 1\n\ngoal_vs_result:\n goal:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens B-1 candidate-file column\n bare `pipeline.py` token 을 간접 reference (orchestration entry,\n Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유) 로 재분류.\n - 간접 surface (pipeline orchestration entry, page_structure 생성 흐름)\n 명시.\n - direct composition planner / zone-section assignment override\n implementation 영역과 distinct axis 명시.\n - guardrail: audit doc §1 표 정정만, 다른 axis 무관.\n - cross-ref 정합.\n result:\n - commit a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8 — single file\n (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md), numstat 1/1, single hunk at L104.\n - bare token 뒤 `(간접 — orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure\n 생성 흐름 보유)` annotation append.\n - §2.11 L1146 / L1150 / L1202 / L1217-1219 indirect-surface SoT 와\n 정합.\n - INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 (line 140) / BACKLOG §3 IMP-25 (line 85) 이미\n 정합 → no edit.\n - Both remotes (origin GitHub, slide2 Gitea mirror) advance to\n a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8.\n match: true\n\ncommit_verification:\n local_head: a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8\n parent: b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 # IMP-24 close commit\n origin_main: a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8\n slide2_main: a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8\n remotes_match: true\n commit_message: 'docs(#25): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens B-1 row candidate-file 칸 정정'\n files_changed: ['docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md']\n numstat: '1 1'\n hunk: '@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@'\n tracked_working_tree: clean\n\nissue_metadata:\n current_state: open\n current_labels: ['needs-codex-review']\n milestone: 'B-3 §3 audit §1 mapping correction (5)'\n predecessor_pattern:\n - '#21 closed at 2026-05-20T13:33:34+09:00 (label retained: needs-codex-review)'\n - '#22 closed at 2026-05-20T14:13:30+09:00 (label retained: needs-codex-review)'\n - '#23 closed at 2026-05-20T14:50:46+09:00 (label retained: needs-codex-review)'\n - '#24 closed at 2026-05-20T17:29:47+09:00 (label retained: needs-codex-review)'\n\nreview_loop_state:\n - 'Codex 1차 review: complete (Stage 1 sign-off — verdict YES)'\n - 'Claude 재검토: complete (Stage 2 simulation-plan + Stage 4 verification)'\n - 'Codex 재검증: complete (Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS + Stage 3 YES + Stage 4 PASS + Stage 5 push PASS)'\n - 'scope-locked: complete (Stage 1 exit report scope_lock)'\n - 'ready-for-implementation: complete (Stage 2 exit report FINAL_CONSENSUS)'\n - 'implemented: complete (Stage 3 edit u1 + Stage 5 commit a71355e)'\n - 'verified: complete (Stage 4 pytest --collect-only 342 collected + Stage 5 dual-remote push)'\n\nclose_decision: close\n\nfollow_up_axes:\n - id: b1_direct_implementation_axis\n summary: 'B-1 direct implementation surface (src/phase_z2_pipeline.py\n zone-section assignment override + tests/test_phase_z2_section_assignment_override.py).'\n why_deferred: 'IMP-25 scope-lock is doc-only §1 cell qualifier append;\n direct implementation is a distinct axis already aligned with\n §2.11 evidence.'\n proposed_disposition: 'No separate IMP needed — direct implementation\n already in place; doc-only correction was the gap.'\n - id: section_1_residual_rows_reverification\n summary: '§1 잔여 audit row direct/indirect 재검증 — B-2 (Edited HTML →\n MDX 역변환), B-3 (Sub-section drag drop), B-4 (layout zone-geometry\n override 확장) 등 별 axis.'\n why_deferred: 'Distinct rows / distinct §2 SoT lenses. IMP-25 L5 closes\n only B-1.'\n proposed_disposition: 'Continue audit lens correction milestone if\n additional rows surface inaccuracies; B-3 milestone 5/5 complete\n after IMP-25 close.'\n - id: backlog_imp_25_status_update\n summary: 'BACKLOG §3 IMP-25 row (line 85) status `pending → done/closed`\n 갱신.'\n why_deferred: 'Stage 6 close-only axis; separate doc-update turn matches\n precedent for IMP-21 / IMP-22 / IMP-23 / IMP-24.'\n proposed_disposition: 'Separate doc-only turn or batch update with other\n closed B-3 milestone issues; B-3 milestone full closure batch possible\n after IMP-25 close (5/5).'\n - id: insight_map_l5_row\n summary: 'PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md L5 row (line 140) already\n in sync — no cleanup needed.'\n why_deferred: 'Already aligned, listed for completeness.'\n proposed_disposition: 'No action required.'\n - id: b3_milestone_closure\n summary: 'B-3 §3 audit §1 mapping correction (5) milestone full closure\n after IMP-25 close (5/5).'\n why_deferred: 'Milestone closure is a separate governance action\n orthogonal to per-issue close.'\n proposed_disposition: 'Optional follow-up; milestone auto-completes when\n all 5 child issues (IMP-21~25) are closed.'\n\nguardrails:\n - No code edit (`src/pipeline.py`, `src/pipeline_context.py`, `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`, tests/ untouched).\n - No §2.11 (line 1136–1228) / §3 / §4 / §7 text drift.\n - No INSIGHT-MAP §4 L5 row (line 140) edit.\n - No BACKLOG §3 IMP-25 row (line 85) edit (deferred to follow-up turn).\n - No `pipeline_context.py` §1 row addition (per §2.11 L1146 evidence).\n - No new commits beyond a71355e.\n - Label `needs-codex-review` retained, mirroring IMP-21 / IMP-22 / IMP-23 / IMP-24.\n - Close action is the only state change in Stage 6 Round #1.\n\nevidence:\n - command: 'git rev-parse HEAD'\n value: 'a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8'\n - command: 'git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main'\n value: 'a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8\trefs/heads/main'\n - command: 'git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main'\n value: 'a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8\trefs/heads/main'\n - command: 'git show --stat a71355e'\n value: '1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) — docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md'\n - command: 'git show -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (line 104)'\n value: '§1 B-1 row candidate-file cell now reads `pipeline.py` (간접 —\n orchestration entry, Stage Y page_structure 생성 흐름 보유)'\n - api: 'GET /repos/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25'\n value: 'state=open, labels=[needs-codex-review], milestone=B-3 §3 audit\n §1 mapping correction (5)'\n - api: 'GET /repos/.../issues/21|22|23|24'\n value: '#21 closed 2026-05-20T13:33:34+09:00; #22 closed\n 2026-05-20T14:13:30+09:00; #23 closed 2026-05-20T14:50:46+09:00;\n #24 closed 2026-05-20T17:29:47+09:00; all four retained label\n needs-codex-review.'\n\nsource_comment_ids:\n - Claude #1 (Stage 6 final-close round 1)\n\ncommit_sha:\n imp_25_commit: a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8\n push_state: dual-remote synced (origin + slide2)\n\nready_for_close: true\n```\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:58:44+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:58:44+09:00"}, {"id": 21680, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25#issuecomment-21680", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/25", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 6 final-close verification - IMP-25 L5\n\nPASS. Final verification confirms commit `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8` is the current local HEAD on `main`, and both `origin/main` and `slide2/main` point to the same SHA. The commit is one doc-only change: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, 1 insertion and 1 deletion, limited to the row B-1 candidate-file cell.\n\nScope checks pass. There is no tracked working-tree diff after the commit; `git status --short` shows only untracked local artifacts. `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104` now annotates `pipeline.py` as an indirect orchestration entry carrying the Stage Y `page_structure` creation flow. The evidence anchors in `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` section 2.11 and `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140` remain aligned with that indirect-surface classification. `pipeline_context.py` was not added to the audit row, which matches the section 2.11 evidence that it has no direct audit-list mapping. The IMP-25 backlog row remains `pending`, consistent with the Stage 5/6 reports that close/status-row handling is a separate axis.\n\nNo full pytest was run in this final-close verification. This stage did not require it, and Stage 4 already reported collection-only PASS for the doc-only change.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\tmp\\codex_prompt.txt'`\n- `git status --short`\n- `git rev-parse HEAD`\n- `git log -n 1 --oneline --stat`\n- `git show --name-status --oneline --no-renames HEAD`\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main`\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main`\n- `git diff --name-only HEAD`\n- `git show --stat --oneline HEAD`\n- `git show -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"B-1|Zone-section|pipeline.py|pipeline_context\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"L5|pipeline.py|orchestration entry|page_structure|direct composition planner|zone-section\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `rg -n \"IMP-25|#25|B-1\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `git branch --show-current`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\tmp\\codex_prompt.txt`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n\nTest results:\n- Stage 6: not run; final-close verification did not explicitly require tests.\n- Stage 4 binding report: `python -m pytest --collect-only -q tests` collected 342 tests with no collection errors.\n\nCommit SHA:\n- `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`\n\nVerified facts:\n- Current branch is `main`.\n- Local `HEAD`, `origin/main`, and `slide2/main` all resolve to `a71355e0059caaae9d53372ba2987551998bd7b8`.\n- `HEAD` contains exactly one tracked file change: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` with 1 insertion and 1 deletion.\n- The committed hunk changes only the B-1 candidate-file cell from bare `pipeline.py` to `pipeline.py` plus the indirect orchestration-entry qualifier.\n- `git diff --name-only HEAD` is empty, so there is no remaining tracked diff after the commit.\n- `git diff --check -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` is clean.\n- `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:104`, section 2.11 anchors, and `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:140` agree that `pipeline.py` is an indirect surface, not the direct zone-section assignment override implementation.\n- `pipeline_context.py` was not added to row B-1, matching the section 2.11 evidence that it has no direct audit-list mapping.\n- `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:85` still marks IMP-25 as `pending`; no backlog/status edit was included in the committed scope.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T18:00:46+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T18:00:46+09:00"}] |