1 line
96 KiB
JSON
1 line
96 KiB
JSON
[{"id": 21579, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21579", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review — IMP-24 K6 (block_reference / block_selector A-2 column 정정)\n\n## 1. Root cause\n\nPHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 audit lens row **A-2** (line 99) lists the candidate-file column as:\n\n```\n`block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`\n```\n\n— bare tokens with no qualification, identical in shape to direct-candidate cells like A-1 (`mdx_normalizer.py`, `section_parser.py`) or A-5 (`fit_verifier.py`). This presents the two files as direct A-2 (Catalog 확장 — frame_contracts + frame_partials) candidates.\n\nThat presentation contradicts the §2.10 audit body, which is the binding SoT for these two modules. Verified factually:\n\n- **§2.10 — 관련 §7-B 항목 표 (line 1023)**: `A-2 ... | (간접) | Phase Q catalog.yaml 로딩 / block 검색 패턴이 Phase Z catalog 확장 시 reference. 단 Phase Q catalog (block id + variant) vs Phase Z catalog (frame contract + frame partial) — schema 다름`. **Mapping is explicitly typed `(간접)`**, not direct.\n- **§2.10 — 후속 참고 사항 (line 1072)**: `§1 audit lens 의 A-2 매핑은 *간접* (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도)`.\n- **§2.10 K6 (line 1089)**: `K6. (factual note) — §1 audit lens 의 A-2 매핑 정확도: *간접* (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도). §1 직접 정정은 별 axis (G2 + I6 + J5 누적 + K6)` — the §2.10 catch that this issue (IMP-24) is the closing axis of.\n- **§2.10 audit 판정 (line 1070)**: `§3 Salvage 적용 대상: 없음 (Salvage Candidate 0)`. Combined with §3-A row at line 1242 (`A-2 Catalog 확장 | 없음 (§2.10 Salvage 0) | 새로 만들기 (frame_contracts + frame_partials catalog)`), the A-2 main work is *new construction* of `frame_contracts.yaml` + `frame_partials`, not salvage from these two Phase Q files.\n\nSchema-divergence factual basis (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z catalog):\n\n- **Phase Q catalog** = `templates/blocks/catalog.yaml` (block id + variant), loaded by `block_reference._load_catalog` and `block_selector.load_catalog`. Confirmed by §2.10 — 핵심 함수 (lines 1002, 1011).\n- **Phase Z catalog** = `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` entry + `templates/phase_z2/frames/{template_id}.html` partial. Confirmed by the A-2 row's own output column at line 99.\n- `_get_block_by_id` (Phase Q) operates on block id keys (Reference Only — duplicated across block_reference / block_selector / §2.8 renderer); Phase Z resolves `frame_id → frame_contract`. Confirmed by §2.10 (line 1030).\n\nINSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 cross-ref already states the same: `audit §1 lens A-2 (Catalog 확장) 후보로 listed — *간접* (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도). A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 등록/확장 (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z catalog schema)` (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139). The §2.10 audit body and the cross-ref index agree; only the §1 lens A-2 cell lags.\n\n## 2. Scope-lock\n\n| axis | included | excluded |\n|---|---|---|\n| file | `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only | any other doc / code / config / template / frontend / src / pipeline |\n| line range | line 99 — only the trailing candidate-file column (`` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` ``) of the A-2 row | the rest of the row (목적 / input / output / 우선순위 columns), all other §1 rows, all §2 / §3 / §4 sections, INSIGHT-MAP, ROADMAP, backlog |\n| edit nature | annotate the existing bare tokens with a factual `(간접 — ...)` parenthetical, mirroring the IMP-22 (`renderer.py (간접 — render-path 자료)`) pattern. **No removal of tokens.** | dropping `block_reference.py` or `block_selector.py` from the cell; rewording / 재배치 of §2.10 audit body; touching IMP-21 / 22 / 23 annotations |\n| meaning | doc-only audit-trace correction | no runtime / pipeline / 22-step behavior change |\n\n**Precedent decision (annotate vs drop)**:\n\n- IMP-22 `renderer.py` precedent (annotate with `(간접 — render-path 자료)`): mapping is indirect but exists → annotate, not drop.\n- IMP-21 `content_editor.py` precedent (drop entirely): mapping is wholly absent (`content_editor.py = slot-fill / Kei editor only`) → drop.\n- IMP-23 `html_generator.py` precedent (drop entirely): mapping is wholly absent (selenium import 부재 for A-3; slide-base 호출 부재 for A-4) → drop.\n\nFor IMP-24, §2.10 K6 explicitly types the mapping as `*간접*` (not absent), and §2.10's audit body (lines 1019, 1068–1075) keeps both files as audited Reference Only candidates whose `catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴` does have *reference value* for the A-2 catalog construction work. Therefore the IMP-22 (annotate) pattern applies, not the IMP-21 / 23 (drop) pattern.\n\n**Proposed annotation text (verbatim, to be locked in Stage 2):**\n\nA-2 cell replacement (line 99 trailing column):\n\n```\n`block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; Phase Q catalog (block id + variant) ≠ Phase Z catalog (frame contract + frame partial) schema)\n```\n\nThis mirrors the §2.10 — 관련 §7-B 표 (line 1023) wording verbatim (\"Phase Q catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴이 Phase Z catalog 확장 시 reference. 단 Phase Q catalog (block id + variant) vs Phase Z catalog (frame contract + frame partial) — schema 다름\") and the IMP-22 §1 annotation pattern, preserving the file listing (consistent with §0-A's *additive cross-ref over silent removal* posture) while marking the mapping indirect with schema-divergence factual basis.\n\n## 3. Guardrails / validation\n\n1. **§1 A-2 row only** — no edit to §0, §2.10 audit body, §3, §4, INSIGHT-MAP, ROADMAP, backlog status. Line range = 99 only.\n2. **§2.10 audit body untouched** — §2.10 — 관련 §7-B 항목 (line 1023), 후속 참고 사항 (lines 1072–1075), K6 catch (line 1089), audit 판정 (line 1070) all remain verbatim. They are the SoT this issue is closing — rewriting them would defeat the cross-ref.\n3. **§2 모듈 list line 129 annotation `(A-2)` preserved** — `10. block_reference.py / block_selector.py (A-2)` stays as-is. IMP-21 precedent (which removed `(B-1, B-2)` from content_editor's L125 entry) applies only when the mapping is wholly absent; here the mapping is `*간접*` per §2.10 K6 (mapping does exist), so the §2 enumeration annotation is correct as-is. Removing it would silently break §2.10's own `§1 §2 audit list` line 1019 (`block_reference.py / block_selector.py (A-2)`).\n4. **Hard link to IMP-21 / 22 / 23** — all three already merged (5590ef2 / 2ace54b / 447e702). Order dependency satisfied. The IMP-22 annotation style is the precedent that applies (indirect mapping exists), not the IMP-21 / 23 token-drop precedent (mapping absent).\n5. **No code touched** — `src/block_reference.py` / `src/block_selector.py` themselves are not modified. Reference Only verdict (§2.10) is the audit posture; cleanup of duplication (K5 cleanup 별 axis) is a separate axis outside IMP-24 scope.\n6. **No other axis cross-contamination** — A-2 catalog 구축 axis (§3-A line 1242 / §4 line 1284 — \"새로 만들기 frame_contracts + frame_partials\") is a separate axis not opened by IMP-24. IMP-24 is doc-only audit lens cleanup, not A-2 construction.\n7. **Factual verification (RULE 5: value + path + upstream + unknown surface):**\n - value: §1 lens A-2 row currently bare `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` `` — verified at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99`.\n - value: §2.10 audit body types mapping as `(간접)` — verified at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023` (관련 §7-B 표), L1072 (후속 참고 사항), L1089 (K6 catch).\n - value: §2.10 Salvage Candidate = 0 — verified at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070`. §3-A confirms A-2 = \"새로 만들기\" with no Phase Q salvage — verified at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242`.\n - value: Phase Q catalog schema = block id + variant; Phase Z catalog schema = frame contract + frame partial — verified at §2.10 핵심 함수 (lines 1002, 1011) and A-2 row output column (line 99) respectively.\n - upstream: INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139` (verbatim mirror of K6 catch).\n - upstream: backlog IMP-24 row at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84` (status=pending; ↓ low; doc-only).\n - unknown surface: whether `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` candidate listings exist elsewhere in §1 outside line 99 — confirmed via grep (lines listing the file tokens outside §2.10 audit body): only line 99 (A-2 row) and line 129 (§2 module enumeration). Line 129 is a §2 module list annotated with its §1 axis — kept as-is per guardrail 3. Other matches (lines 251, 786, 992, 998–1075, 1097, 1119, 1219, 1242, 1284, 1347–1350) are §2.X audit bodies / §3 / §4 sections — all out of scope.\n\n## 4. Stage 2 plan preview (not executed in Stage 1)\n\n- Edit only line 99 of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- Use `Edit` tool with `old_string` = `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` `` (sufficiently unique — only one occurrence on L99) and `new_string` = the annotated form above.\n- No regenerate of TOC, no other surfaces.\n- No tests required (doc-only edit; no pipeline coverage axis).\n- Commit message style follows IMP-21 / 22 / 23: `docs(#24): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-2 block_reference/block_selector 칸 정정`.\n\n## 5. Review loop posture\n\n- This stage produces a scope-lock proposal only. No edits made to the audit doc yet.\n- Awaiting Codex review for `FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES/NO` before proceeding to Stage 2 plan + Stage 3 edit.\n- If FINAL_CONSENSUS: NO, expected rewind_target = `stage_1_review` (this stage) for any factual / scope refinement, or `stage_2_plan` if the scope is accepted but the proposed annotation wording must change (e.g., shorter form, different schema clause phrasing, or token-order reversal).\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:18:59+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:18:59+09:00"}, {"id": 21582, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21582", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review verification - IMP-24 K6\n\nVerdict: root cause confirmed; scope-lock confirmed. No code/test/template changes are justified in Stage 1.\n\nRoot cause verification:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` A-2 lists the candidate-file column as `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py`, which reads like a direct A-2 candidate mapping.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023` classifies the same A-2 relation as indirect: Phase Q `catalog.yaml` loading / block-search patterns are only reference material, and the Phase Q catalog schema differs from the Phase Z `frame_contracts` + frame partial schema.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1029-1030` confirms the concrete abstraction mismatch: `_load_catalog` / `load_catalog` map to a Phase Z `frame_contracts.yaml` loader, and `_get_block_by_id` maps only loosely to frame contract lookup.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070-1072` confirms `Salvage Candidate: none` for `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py`, with only Reference Only assets for separate future axes.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089` records K6 as the factual note: the A-2 mapping is indirect, and direct correction of the section 1 lens is a separate axis.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242` confirms A-2 is \"new construction\" from `frame_contracts + frame_partials catalog`, not salvage from those Phase Q modules.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139` matches that conclusion: K6 says the audit section 1 A-2 candidate listing is indirect and that A-2 main work is `frame_contracts.yaml` + `frame_partials`.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84` matches the issue scope: IMP-24 is a low-priority doc-only correction for the audit section 1 lens A-2 column.\n\nCode/path verification:\n- `src/block_reference.py:110-124` contains `_load_catalog` / `_get_block_by_id` against Phase Q `templates/catalog.yaml`.\n- `src/block_selector.py:22` and `src/block_selector.py:57-78` contain the Phase Q `templates/catalog.yaml` path and `load_catalog` / `_get_block_by_id` helpers.\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:34` and `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:49-57` show Phase Z loads `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` through `load_frame_contracts()` / `get_contract(template_id)`.\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py:2062` currently renders Phase Z partials from `families/{template_id}.html`; `templates/phase_z2/frames/` exists but only contains two HTML files. This does not change the IMP-24 root cause because the requested scope is the candidate-file column only, but it is a factual note against over-reading the audit row's output path.\n\nScope-lock:\n- Included: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only, A-2 row candidate-file column only.\n- Excluded: code, tests, templates, catalog schema, output-path wording, Phase Z runtime renderer paths, and other audit axes.\n- No missing blocking files for Stage 1 review: the referenced docs exist, `src/block_reference.py` and `src/block_selector.py` exist, and the Phase Z catalog path exists.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\tmp\\codex_prompt.txt'`\n- `rg -n \"block_reference|block_selector|A-2|K6|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Salvage|_get_block_by_id|catalog.yaml\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"K6|A-2|block_reference|block_selector|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Phase Q catalog|Phase Z catalog\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `rg --files | rg \"block_reference\\.py|block_selector\\.py|frame_contracts\\.yaml|catalog\\.yaml|templates/phase_z2/frames|templates\\\\phase_z2\\\\frames\"`\n- `rg -n \"def _load_catalog|def load_catalog|def _get_block_by_id|catalog\\.yaml\" src\\block_reference.py src\\block_selector.py`\n- `rg -n \"A-2.*Catalog|Salvage 0|frame_contracts \\+ frame_partials|새로|frame_partials catalog|A-2 catalog\" docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'templates\\phase_z2\\frames' -Filter '*.html' -File`\n- `Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'templates\\phase_z2\\families' -Filter '*.html' -File`\n- `Get-Content` line-window checks for `docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, `src\\phase_z2_pipeline.py`, and `src\\phase_z2_mapper.py`\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `src/block_reference.py`\n- `src/block_selector.py`\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `src/phase_z2_pipeline.py`\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`\n- `templates/phase_z2/frames/*.html`\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/*.html`\nTest results: Not run; Stage 1 explicitly says grep/find and NO pytest.\nVerified facts:\n- The section 1 A-2 candidate column is the lagging text.\n- The section 2.10 audit body classifies `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` as indirect Reference Only, with Salvage Candidate 0.\n- The cross-reference map and backlog agree with the doc-only IMP-24 scope.\n- A-2 implementation ownership remains `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame partial catalog construction, not direct salvage from the two Phase Q modules.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:22:30+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:22:30+09:00"}, {"id": 21584, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21584", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "📌 **[Claude #1] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 — IMP-24 K6**\n\n■ **Axis enumeration (issue body coverage)**\n\n| axis | issue body item | unit |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `block_reference` / `block_selector` 의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정 | u1 |\n| 2 | 간접 매핑 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도) surface form | u1 |\n| 3 | A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials (Phase Q ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시 | u1 |\n| g-a | audit doc §1 표 정정만 | u1 scope-lock |\n| g-b | cross-ref 정합 (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24) | verify-only (Stage 1 exit: 이미 정합) |\n\n3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.\n\n■ **Before / after**\n\n- **Before** (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` candidate-file col): bare tokens `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` `` — shape 가 A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 → §2.10 SoT (line 1023 `(간접)` / 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 *간접* / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.\n- **After**: `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) `` — IMP-22 commit `2ace54b` 가 A-3 에서 lock 한 `` `<file>` (간접 — <reason>) `` 패턴 추종. §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror. A-2 main 후보가 *기존 file 아닌 신규 artifact* 이므로 본문에 명시 = §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.\n\n■ **Out of scope**\n\n- `src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py` 코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` 신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).\n- §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B 본문 무변경 (이미 정합).\n- §1 다른 row (A-1, A-3~A-6, B-*, D-*) 무변경; IMP-22 의 A-3 / A-4 surface form boundary 보존.\n- `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139` / `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84` 무변경 (Stage 1 exit 확인: 이미 정합).\n\n■ **Rollback**\n\n`git revert <commit>` — 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert.\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을 `(간접 — ...)` 표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell)\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 2\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: 단일 markdown table cell 정정. line 99 의 `block_reference.py, block_selector.py` 뒤에 §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 의 `(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)` 표기 append. 실제 line 변경 = 1 (markdown table row 한 줄). atomic 기준 (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족. tests 없음 — doc-only, code/test/template 무변경 (Stage 1 scope_lock).\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\ncommands_run:\n - git show 447e702 --stat\n - git show 2ace54b -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n - Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:90–112\n - Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1015–1099\n\nfiles_checked:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99 (defect — bare tokens)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:100 (precedent — A-3 `(간접 — render-path 자료)`)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023 (SoT — `(간접)` typing)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070 (SoT — Salvage Candidate 0)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1072 (SoT — A-2 매핑 *간접*)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089 (SoT — K6: §1 직접 정정 = 별 axis)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242 (SoT — §3-A A-2 = 새로 만들기, ref via Stage 1 exit evidence)\n\nfacts:\n - §1 row A-2 candidate-file (line 99) bare tokens — direct-candidate shape (A-1, A-5 와 동일) → §2.10 SoT 모순.\n - §2.10 lines 1023 / 1070 / 1072 / 1089 모두 동일 file 들을 `(간접)` + Salvage 0 으로 type.\n - IMP-22 commit 2ace54b 가 A-3 row 에서 `(간접 — <reason>)` surface form lock — reusable precedent.\n - Cross-ref docs (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6:139, BACKLOG §3 IMP-24:84) Stage 1 exit 확인: 이미 정합 → 무변경.\n - 1 unit / 1 file / ≤ 2 lines → atomic + scope-lock + doc-only invariant 만족.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:26:49+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:26:49+09:00"}, {"id": 21587, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21587", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Requalify PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as indirect reference mapping.\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests:\n - pytest -q tests\n estimate_lines: 1\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: Covers the issue-body axis for block_reference/block_selector by changing only the A-2 candidate-file cell from bare file tokens to an indirect-reference annotation.\n- u1: Covers the indirect mapping axis by tying the files to catalog loading and block lookup patterns, not direct A-2 implementation ownership.\n- u1: Covers the A-2 main-work axis by preserving frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials as the real Phase Z construction target and noting the Phase Q/Phase Z schema split.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- No changes to src/block_reference.py or src/block_selector.py; they are Phase Q reference modules for this issue.\n- No changes to templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml or frame partials; that is A-2 implementation work, not this doc-only correction.\n- No changes to section 2.10, section 3-A, section 7-B, other section 1 audit rows, PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, or PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Revert the single Stage 3 commit; the planned commit should touch only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- git status --short\n- Select-String -LiteralPath docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md -Pattern \"\\\\| \\\\*\\\\*A-2\\\\*\\\\*\"\n- rg -n \"K6|A-2 main|Salvage Candidate|Reference Only|block_reference.py|block_selector.py|frame_contracts\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md\n- rg -n \"load_catalog|_load_catalog|_get_block_by_id\" src/block_reference.py src/block_selector.py\n- git log --oneline -5 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n- pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1044\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1057\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84\n- src/block_reference.py:110\n- src/block_reference.py:124\n- src/block_selector.py:57\n- src/block_selector.py:78\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 45.36s\nVerified facts:\n- Current defect exists: section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell still lists block_reference.py and block_selector.py as bare tokens.\n- Cross-reference map already states K6 is indirect and identifies frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials as A-2 main work.\n- Section 2.10 states Salvage Candidate is none and K6 says the section 1 A-2 mapping is indirect.\n- Section 3-A states A-2 is new construction with frame_contracts + frame_partials catalog.\n- Backlog IMP-24 is doc-only and limited to audit section 1 A-2 column correction plus cross-ref consistency.\n- Reviewed implementation_units block has one unit, one file, and an estimate below 50 lines and 3 files.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:29:33+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:29:33+09:00"}, {"id": 21589, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21589", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "📌 **[Claude #2] Stage 2: 시뮬 기반 계획 수립 Round #2 — IMP-24 K6**\n\n■ **Axis enumeration (issue body — full coverage)**\n\n| axis | issue body item | unit |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `block_reference` / `block_selector` 의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정 | u1 |\n| 2 | 간접 매핑 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도) surface form | u1 |\n| 3 | A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시 | u1 |\n| g-a | audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) | u1 scope-lock |\n| g-b | cross-ref 정합 (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24) | verify-only (Stage 1 exit: 이미 정합) |\n\n3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 markdown cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.\n\n■ **Round #1 → Round #2 convergence**\n\n- Claude r1 + Codex r1 모두 u1 single-cell edit 동의. files = `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` 단일. tests 만 분기 (Claude r1 = `[]`, Codex r1 = `pytest -q tests` / 337 passed).\n- Round #2 lock: tests 에 `pytest -q tests` 포함 — doc-only edit 이나 RULE 4 (pytest -q tests) sanity gate 로 regression no-op 확인. 추가 비용 < 50 s.\n- Surface form lock (Stage 1 unresolved → Stage 2 fix): IMP-22 commit `2ace54b` 가 A-3 에서 lock 한 `` `<file>` (간접 — <reason>) `` 패턴 추종 + §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror.\n\n■ **Before / after**\n\n- **Before** (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` candidate-file col): bare tokens `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` `` — shape 가 A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 → §2.10 SoT (line 1023 `(간접)` / 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 *간접* / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.\n- **After**: `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) `` — IMP-22 surface pattern + §2.10 SoT phrasing mirror. A-2 main 후보가 *기존 file 아닌 신규 artifact* 임을 cell 안에 명시 → §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.\n\n■ **Out of scope**\n\n- `src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py` 코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` 신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).\n- §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B 본문 무변경 (이미 정합).\n- §1 다른 row (A-1, A-3~A-6, B-*, D-*) 무변경; IMP-22 의 A-3 / A-4 surface form boundary 보존.\n- `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139` / `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84` 무변경 (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1 verified facts 모두 정합 확인).\n\n■ **Rollback**\n\n`git revert <commit>` — 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert. side effect 없음 (doc-only, code/test/template 무관).\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을 `(간접 — ...)` 표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell). IMP-22 A-3 surface pattern + §2.10 line 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests:\n - pytest -q tests\n estimate_lines: 1\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: 단일 markdown table cell 정정. line 99 bare tokens 뒤에 `(간접 — ...)` 표기 append (above \"After\" surface form). table row 1 줄 = 1 line diff. atomic (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족.\n- tests `pytest -q tests`: doc-only no-op sanity gate. Codex r1 baseline 337 passed / 45.36s. regression 가능성 0 단 RULE 4 보호.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\ncommands_run:\n - git show 2ace54b --stat\n - git show 2ace54b -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md (IMP-22 surface pattern 확인)\n - Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:90–104 (defect line 99)\n - Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1015–1099 (SoT block)\n\nfiles_checked:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99 (defect — bare tokens `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` confirmed)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:100 (precedent — A-3 `(간접 — render-path 자료)` IMP-22 pattern)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023 (SoT — `(간접)` typing for A-2)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070 (SoT — Salvage Candidate 0)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1072 (SoT — `간접 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도)`)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089 (SoT — K6 closing axis)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242 (SoT — A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, §3-A)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139 (cross-ref aligned per Codex r1)\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84 (IMP-24 scope = doc-only)\n\nverified_facts:\n - Defect persists at line 99 (bare tokens, no `(간접)` annotation).\n - IMP-22 commit 2ace54b locked the surface pattern `` `<file>` (간접 — <reason>) `` at A-3.\n - §2.10 SoT typing the A-2 mapping as `(간접)` already exists at line 1023 / 1072.\n - Cross-ref docs (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24) already aligned — Stage 1 exit + Codex r1 both verified, no edit needed.\n\nsource_comment_ids:\n - [Claude #1] Stage 2 r1 — IMP-24 K6\n - [Codex #1] Stage 2 r1 review — IMP-24 K6 (337 tests passed baseline)\n - [Claude #2] Stage 2 r2 — IMP-24 K6 (this comment)\n\ncommit_sha: (none — Stage 2 produces no commits; doc edit deferred to Stage 3)\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:32:42+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:32:42+09:00"}, {"id": 21592, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21592", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Requalify the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as an indirect reference mapping, consistent with section 2.10 K6 and the Phase Q/Phase Z catalog schema split.\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests:\n - pytest -q tests\n estimate_lines: 1\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: Covers the issue-body `block_reference` / `block_selector` correction by changing only the section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell from bare file tokens to an indirect-reference annotation.\n- u1: Covers the indirect mapping axis by tying those files to catalog loading and block lookup/reference patterns, not direct A-2 implementation ownership.\n- u1: Covers the A-2 main-work axis by keeping `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials as the real Phase Z construction target and noting the Phase Q catalog vs Phase Z catalog schema split.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- No changes to `src/block_reference.py` or `src/block_selector.py`; they are Phase Q reference modules for this issue.\n- No changes to `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` or frame partials; that is A-2 implementation work outside this doc-only correction.\n- No changes to section 2.10, section 3-A, section 7-B, other section 1 audit rows, `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`, or `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Revert the single Stage 3 commit; the planned commit should touch only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `Select-String -LiteralPath 'docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern '\\| \\*\\*A-2\\*\\*'`\n- `rg -n \"K6|A-2 main|Salvage Candidate|Reference Only|block_reference.py|block_selector.py|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Phase Q catalog|Phase Z\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `rg -n \"load_catalog|_load_catalog|_get_block_by_id\" src/block_reference.py src/block_selector.py`\n- `pytest -q tests`\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84`\n- `src/block_reference.py:110`\n- `src/block_reference.py:124`\n- `src/block_selector.py:57`\n- `src/block_selector.py:78`\nTest results:\n- `pytest -q tests`: 337 passed in 40.73s\nVerified facts:\n- The implementation plan has one unit, one file, and an estimated one-line doc edit, so it satisfies the <=50 lines / <=3 files unit limit.\n- The unit covers all issue-body axes: bare `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` correction, indirect catalog-loading/block-lookup reference wording, and A-2 main work as `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials with a Phase Q/Phase Z schema distinction.\n- The guardrails are covered: audit section 1 A-2 cell only, cross-references already aligned, no code/template/catalog/test file changes planned.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:35:10+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:35:10+09:00"}, {"id": 21593, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21593", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #3] Stage 2: simulation-plan Round #3 — IMP-24 K6\n\nAxis enumeration (issue body — full coverage)\n\n| axis | issue body item | unit |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `block_reference` / `block_selector` 의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정 | u1 |\n| 2 | 간접 매핑 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도) surface form | u1 |\n| 3 | A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시 | u1 |\n| g-a | audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) | u1 scope-lock |\n| g-b | cross-ref 정합 (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24) | verify-only (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1 verified facts: 이미 정합) |\n\n3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 markdown cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.\n\nRound #1 → #2 → #3 convergence\n\n- r1: Claude single-cell edit u1 / Codex single-cell edit u1 — files / scope / surface form 모두 일치.\n- r2: tests `pytest -q tests` sanity gate 추가 (Codex r1 baseline 337 passed in 45.36s; Codex r2 337 passed in 40.73s). 다른 axis 변동 없음.\n- r3 (this): r2 plan unchanged. surface form locked. Stage 3 implementation 준비 완료.\n\nBefore / after (file:line reference only)\n\n- Before — `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` candidate-file column: bare tokens `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` — A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 shape → §2.10 SoT (line 1023 `(간접)` / 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 *간접* / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.\n- After — bare tokens 뒤에 `(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)` 표기 append. IMP-22 commit `2ace54b` 의 A-3 lock surface pattern `<file>` (간접 — <reason>) 추종 + §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror. 본문에 A-2 main artifact (신규 구축) 명시 → §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.\n\nOut of scope (Stage 1 exit re-lock)\n\n- `src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py` 코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` 신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).\n- §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B 본문 무변경 (이미 정합).\n- §1 다른 row (A-1, A-3~A-6, B-*, D-*) 무변경; IMP-22 의 A-3 / A-4 surface form boundary 보존.\n- `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139` / `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84` 무변경 (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1/r2 verified facts 모두 정합 확인).\n\nRollback strategy\n\n`git revert <commit>` — 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert. side effect 없음 (doc-only, code/test/template 무관).\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을 `(간접 — ...)` 표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell). IMP-22 A-3 surface pattern + §2.10 line 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests:\n - pytest -q tests\n estimate_lines: 1\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: 단일 markdown table cell 정정. line 99 bare tokens 뒤에 `(간접 — ...)` 표기 append. table row 1 줄 = 1 line diff. atomic (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족.\n- u1 tests: `pytest -q tests` = doc-only no-op sanity gate. Codex r1/r2 baseline 337 passed 확인됨; regression 신호 없음 보증.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\ncommands_run:\n- Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:95-109 (현재 §1 표 상태 재확인 — Round #3)\n- Bash ls .orchestrator/drafts/ (draft dir presence 확인)\n\nfiles_checked:\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99 (defect — bare tokens 잔존 확인)\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:100 (precedent — A-3 `(간접 — render-path 자료)` surface pattern 보존 확인)\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:101 (precedent — A-4 surface form 보존 확인; IMP-22 / IMP-23 boundary)\n\nverified_facts:\n- §1 row A-2 candidate-file column (line 99): 여전히 bare tokens — Round #3 시점 defect 잔존.\n- §1 row A-3 (line 100): `(간접 — render-path 자료)` lock 유지 — IMP-22 commit `2ace54b` boundary 보존.\n- §1 row A-4 (line 101): 본문 surface form 유지 — IMP-22 boundary 보존.\n- Round #1 + Round #2 양측 (Claude + Codex) 모두 동일 u1 plan: 단일 file `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, 단일 cell, estimate_lines = 1, tests = `pytest -q tests`. 변동 없음.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:36:43+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:36:43+09:00"}, {"id": 21597, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21597", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Requalify the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as an indirect reference mapping, consistent with section 2.10 K6 and the Phase Q/Phase Z catalog schema split.\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests:\n - pytest -q tests\n estimate_lines: 1\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: Covers the issue-body `block_reference` / `block_selector` correction by changing only the section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell from bare file tokens to an indirect-reference annotation.\n- u1: Covers the indirect mapping axis by tying those files to catalog loading and block lookup/reference patterns, not direct A-2 implementation ownership.\n- u1: Covers the A-2 main-work axis by keeping `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials as the real Phase Z construction target and noting the Phase Q catalog vs Phase Z catalog schema split.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- No changes to `src/block_reference.py` or `src/block_selector.py`; they are Phase Q reference modules for this issue.\n- No changes to `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` or frame partials; that is A-2 implementation work outside this doc-only correction.\n- No changes to section 2.10, section 3-A, section 7-B, other section 1 audit rows, `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`, or `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Revert the single Stage 3 commit; the planned commit should touch only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `Select-String -LiteralPath 'docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern '\\| \\*\\*A-2\\*\\*' -Context 0,0`\n- `rg -n \"K6|A-2 main|Salvage Candidate|Reference Only|block_reference.py|block_selector.py|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Phase Q catalog|Phase Z\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `rg -n \"load_catalog|_load_catalog|_get_block_by_id\" src/block_reference.py src/block_selector.py`\n- `pytest -q tests`\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84`\n- `src/block_reference.py:110`\n- `src/block_reference.py:124`\n- `src/block_selector.py:57`\n- `src/block_selector.py:78`\nTest results:\n- `pytest -q tests`: 337 passed in 40.98s\nVerified facts:\n- The implementation plan contains one unit, one file, and an estimated one-line doc edit, so each unit is within the <=50 lines / <=3 files limit.\n- The plan covers every issue-body axis: `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` A-2 correction, indirect catalog-loading/block-lookup reference wording, and A-2 main work as `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials with a Phase Q/Phase Z schema distinction.\n- The guardrails are covered: audit section 1 A-2 cell only, cross-references checked, no code/template/catalog edits planned, and rollback is a single commit revert.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:39:39+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:39:39+09:00"}, {"id": 21598, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21598", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #4] Stage 2: simulation-plan Round #4 — IMP-24 K6\n\nAxis enumeration (issue body — full coverage)\n\n| axis | issue body item | unit |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `block_reference` / `block_selector` 의 A-2 매핑 부정확 정정 | u1 |\n| 2 | 간접 매핑 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도) surface form | u1 |\n| 3 | A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials (Phase Q catalog ≠ Phase Z schema) 명시 | u1 |\n| g-a | audit doc §1 표 정정만 (다른 axis 무관) | u1 scope-lock |\n| g-b | cross-ref 정합 (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24) | verify-only (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1 verified facts: 이미 정합) |\n\n3 scoped axes + 2 guardrails 모두 단일 markdown cell edit (line 99 candidate-file column) 로 cover.\n\nRound #1 → #2 → #3 → #4 convergence\n\n- r1: Claude single-cell edit u1 / Codex single-cell edit u1 — files / scope / surface form 모두 일치.\n- r2: tests `pytest -q tests` sanity gate 추가 (Codex r1 baseline 337 passed in 45.36s; Codex r2 337 passed in 40.73s). 다른 axis 변동 없음.\n- r3: r2 plan 그대로 lock. Codex r3 도 동일 plan 재확인 (337 passed in 40.98s).\n- r4 (this): r3 plan unchanged. Defect 재확인 (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` bare tokens 그대로 존재; IMP-23 commit `447e702` 후에도 A-2 row 무변경). Stage 3 (code-edit) 진입 준비 완료. FINAL_CONSENSUS.\n\nBefore / after (file:line reference only — code goes in Stage 3)\n\n- Before — `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` candidate-file column: bare tokens `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` — A-1 / A-5 direct-candidate cell 과 동일 shape → §2.10 SoT (line 1023 `(간접)` / 1070 Salvage 0 / 1072 *간접* / 1089 K6 / 1242 A-2 = 새로 만들기) 와 모순.\n- After — bare tokens 뒤에 `(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)` 표기 append. IMP-22 commit `2ace54b` / IMP-23 commit `447e702` 의 A-3 / A-4 lock surface pattern `<file>` (간접 — <reason>) 추종 + §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror. 본문에 A-2 main artifact (신규 구축) 명시 → §3-A line 1242 + Salvage 0 정합.\n\nOut of scope (Stage 1 exit re-lock)\n\n- `src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py` 코드 무변경 (Phase Q 모듈, 별 axis).\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` 신규 구축 (A-2 main work, 별 IMP).\n- §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B 본문 무변경 (이미 정합).\n- §1 다른 row (A-1, A-3~A-6, B-*, D-*) 무변경; IMP-22 / IMP-23 의 A-3 / A-4 surface form boundary 보존.\n- `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139` / `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84` 무변경 (Stage 1 exit + Codex r1/r2/r3 verified facts 모두 정합 확인).\n\nRollback strategy\n\n`git revert <commit>` — 단일 commit = §1 row A-2 cell 한 칸만 touch → clean revert. side effect 없음 (doc-only, code/test/template 무관).\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 row A-2 candidate-file column 을 `(간접 — ...)` 표기로 정정 (line 99 단일 cell). IMP-22 / IMP-23 의 A-3 / A-4 surface pattern + §2.10 line 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests:\n - pytest -q tests\n estimate_lines: 1\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: 단일 markdown table cell 정정. line 99 bare tokens 뒤에 `(간접 — ...)` 표기 append (above \"After\" surface form). table row 1 줄 = 1 line diff. atomic (≤50 lines, ≤3 files) 충족.\n- u1 tests: `pytest -q tests` = doc-only no-op sanity gate. Codex r1/r2/r3 baseline 337 passed 확인됨; regression 신호 없음 보증.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\ncommands_run:\n- git status --short\n- git log --oneline -3\n- Read docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:95-109 (현재 §1 표 상태 재확인 — Round #4 lock)\n\nfiles_checked:\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99 (defect — bare tokens; r4 재확인)\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:100 (precedent — A-3 `(간접 — render-path 자료)`, IMP-22 lock)\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:101 (precedent — A-4 IMP-22/IMP-23 lock surface boundary)\n\nverified_facts:\n- Defect 그대로: line 99 A-2 candidate-file = `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` `` (qualifier 없음).\n- Adjacent rows: A-1 (line 98) / A-5 (line 102) 도 direct-candidate cell — A-2 가 잘못 같은 shape 따름.\n- Adjacent locked rows: A-3 (line 100) / A-4 (line 101) 는 IMP-22 (`2ace54b`) / IMP-23 (`447e702`) 로 `(간접 — <reason>)` pattern 이미 lock. A-2 surface form = 이 pattern 추종.\n- Cross-ref docs (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 line 139 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 line 84) Codex r1/r2/r3 모두 이미 정합 verified.\n\nsource_comment_ids:\n- [Claude #1] Stage 2 round #1\n- [Codex #1] Stage 2 round #1 (337 passed in 45.36s)\n- [Claude #2] Stage 2 round #2\n- [Codex #2] Stage 2 round #2 (337 passed in 40.73s)\n- [Claude #3] Stage 2 round #3\n- [Codex #3] Stage 2 round #3 (337 passed in 40.98s)\n- [Claude #4] Stage 2 round #4 (this comment)\n\ncommit_sha: (none — Stage 2 produces no commits; doc edit deferred to Stage 3)\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:41:00+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:41:00+09:00"}, {"id": 21603, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21603", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #4] Stage 2 simulation-plan review - IMP-24 K6\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Requalify the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell as an indirect reference mapping, consistent with section 2.10 K6 and the Phase Q/Phase Z catalog schema split.\n files:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md\n tests:\n - pytest -q tests\n estimate_lines: 1\n\nper-unit rationale:\n- u1: Covers the issue-body block_reference/block_selector correction by changing only the section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell from bare file tokens to an indirect-reference annotation.\n- u1: Covers the indirect mapping axis by tying those files to catalog loading and block lookup/reference patterns, not direct A-2 implementation ownership.\n- u1: Covers the A-2 main-work axis by keeping frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials as the real Phase Z construction target and noting the Phase Q catalog vs Phase Z catalog schema split.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- No changes to src/block_reference.py or src/block_selector.py; they are Phase Q reference modules for this issue.\n- No changes to templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml or frame partials; that is A-2 implementation work outside this doc-only correction.\n- No changes to section 2.10, section 3-A, section 7-B, other section 1 audit rows, PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md, or PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Revert the single Stage 3 commit; the planned commit should touch only docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- git status --short\n- Select-String -LiteralPath 'docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern '\\| \\*\\*A-2\\*\\*' -Context 0,0\n- rg -n \"K6|A-2 main|Salvage Candidate|Reference Only|block_reference.py|block_selector.py|frame_contracts|frame_partials|Phase Q catalog|Phase Z\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md\n- rg -n \"load_catalog|_load_catalog|_get_block_by_id\" src/block_reference.py src/block_selector.py\n- pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139\n- docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84\n- src/block_reference.py:110\n- src/block_reference.py:124\n- src/block_selector.py:57\n- src/block_selector.py:78\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: 337 passed in 41.03s\nVerified facts:\n- The plan contains one implementation unit, one file, and an estimated one-line doc edit, so the unit is within the <=50 lines / <=3 files limit.\n- The plan covers every issue-body axis: block_reference.py / block_selector.py A-2 correction, indirect catalog-loading/block-lookup reference wording, and A-2 main work as frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials with a Phase Q/Phase Z schema distinction.\n- The guardrails are covered: audit section 1 A-2 cell only, no other axis changes, and cross-references already align with K6 and IMP-24.\n- The required baseline test command passed.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T15:43:34+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T15:43:34+09:00"}, {"id": 21623, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21623", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-24 K6\n\nExecuting unit: u1\n\n**unit_executed**: `u1`\n\n**files_changed**:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n\n**diff_summary**:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` — §1 audit lens row **A-2** candidate-file column requalified. Bare tokens `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` annotated as indirect references.\n - Before: `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` ``\n - After: `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) ``\n- Single markdown cell touched; row body / other §1 rows / §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B / cross-ref docs unchanged.\n- Surface form mirrors §2.10 line 1023/1072 `(간접)` phrasing and IMP-22 `2ace54b` / IMP-23 `447e702` A-3/A-4 lock pattern `<file>` (간접 — <reason>).\n- `git diff --stat docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → `1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)`.\n\n**remaining_units**: (none — Stage 2 plan defined a single implementation unit `u1`)\n\n**follow_up_issue_candidates**:\n- A-2 main 구축 (`templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` + frame partials 신규) — 별 이슈, 이미 BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 scope-lock 밖.\n- 잔여 §1 audit row direct/indirect 재검증 — 별 이슈, 본 IMP-24 범위 밖.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\nscope_lock_adherence:\n- Single Edit on `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` only (A-2 row candidate-file cell).\n- No code change to `src/block_reference.py` / `src/block_selector.py` (Phase Q reference modules, out of scope per Stage 1/2).\n- No change to `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` / frame partials (A-2 main work, separate axis).\n- No edits to §2.10, §3-A, §7-B, other §1 audit rows, `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`, or `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`.\n\nverified_file_path:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` now reads:\n `| **A-2** | Catalog 확장 (frame_contracts + frame_partials) | ... | ... | ... | \\`block_reference.py\\`, \\`block_selector.py\\` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) | 높음 |`\n\nsource_comment_ids:\n- [Claude #1] Stage 3 code-edit Round #1 — IMP-24 K6\n\ncommit_sha: (none — per stage instructions, no commit / no push in this round; Gitea comment is the deliverable)\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:09:51+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:09:51+09:00"}, {"id": 21625, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21625", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 3 code-edit review IMP-24 K6\n\nVerified unit: u1\n\nVerdict: correct. The executed change is limited to the Section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell in `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, and it requalifies `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` as indirect references while preserving the A-2 main-work target as `frame_contracts.yaml` plus frame partials.\n\nScope verification:\n- `git diff --name-only` reports only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` in the tracked diff.\n- `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` reports `1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)`.\n- The diff changes only the A-2 row candidate-file cell at line 99.\n- No tracked code, template, catalog, cross-reference, Section 2.10, Section 3-A, Section 7-B, or other Section 1 row changes are present.\n\nContract verification:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` now annotates `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` as indirect catalog-loading / block-search-pattern references.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1023` already types A-2 as indirect and notes the Phase Q catalog vs Phase Z catalog schema split.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1070` records Salvage Candidate 0.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1072` says the Section 1 A-2 mapping is indirect.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1089` records K6 as the factual note for correcting Section 1 A-2 mapping accuracy.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:1242` says A-2 catalog extension is new construction of `frame_contracts + frame_partials catalog`.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\.orchestrator\\tmp\\codex_prompt.txt'`\n- `git status --short`\n- `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `Select-String -LiteralPath 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern '^\\| \\*\\*A-2\\*\\* \\|'`\n- `git diff --name-only`\n- `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `Select-String -LiteralPath 'D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md' -Pattern 'A-2.*간접|Salvage Candidate|K6|A-2 =|새로'`\nFiles checked:\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\nTest results:\n- Not run. Current Stage 3 task requires verification of the executed unit only and explicitly says not to run full pytest unless the stage task requires it.\nRemaining units: none\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:11:16+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:11:16+09:00"}, {"id": 21629, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21629", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 4 test-verify Round #1 — IMP-24 K6\n\n📌 **[오케스트레이터] Stage 4: 테스트 및 검증 Round #1**\n\n■ **핵심 결정**\n- Stage 3 unit `u1` 산출 diff 가 Stage 2 plan 과 byte-for-byte 일치 — `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md:99` §1 audit lens A-2 row candidate-file 셀만 수정 (1 file / +1 / −1).\n- After-state surface form 확인 = `` `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) ``, IMP-22 `2ace54b` / IMP-23 `447e702` A-3/A-4 lock pattern `(간접 — <reason>)` + §2.10 라인 1023/1072 phrasing mirror.\n- `pytest -q tests` 결과 = **342 passed in 43.50s**, 실패 0. Stage 2 baseline 337 대비 +5 는 본 IMP-24 commit 무관 — 직전 push 된 orchestrator commit `5d23b74 fix(orchestrator): P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle` 가 추가한 P5b 검증 테스트에서 유래 (doc-only diff 와 독립).\n- Scope-lock 100% 유지: §1 다른 row / §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B / INSIGHT-MAP / BACKLOG / `src/block_reference.py` / `src/block_selector.py` / `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` / frame partials 모두 무변경. 하드코딩 0 (doc-only).\n\n■ **검증 표**\n\n| 항목 | 결과 | 증거 |\n|---|---|---|\n| diff scope | PASS | `git diff --stat` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md \\| 2 +-` (1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)) |\n| diff 위치 | PASS | `git diff` → `@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@`, line 99 단일 markdown 셀만 변경 |\n| surface form | PASS | After-state `block_reference.py, block_selector.py (간접 — ...)` 가 IMP-23 `447e702` line 100 A-3 `renderer.py (간접 — render-path 자료)` 패턴 추종 |\n| §2.10 phrasing mirror | PASS | After-state 의 `(간접)` / `A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축` / `Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z` 가 §2.10 line 1023 `(간접)` + 1072 *간접* + §3-A line 1242 `A-2 = 새로 만들기` 와 정합 |\n| §1 다른 row 무변경 | PASS | `git diff` hunk 1 개, A-2 row 외 변경 0 |\n| §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B 무변경 | PASS | `git diff --name-only` → `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` 1 개, hunk 단일 (line 99) |\n| cross-ref docs 무변경 | PASS | `git diff --name-only` → INSIGHT-MAP / BACKLOG 미포함; pre-existing alignment 유지 (INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 line 139, BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 line 84) |\n| code 무변경 | PASS | `git diff --name-only` → `src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py` 미포함 |\n| catalog 무변경 | PASS | `git diff --name-only` → `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`, frame partials 미포함 |\n| baseline tests | PASS | `pytest -q tests` → 342 passed in 43.50s, 0 failed; +5 from `5d23b74` (orchestrator P5b tests), IMP-24 무관 |\n| 하드코딩 | PASS | doc-only edit; MDX/sample/path 하드코딩 0 |\n| commit scope | N/A (Stage 4) | Stage 5 에서 commit 생성 예정 — staged changes 0, working tree 만 변경 상태 |\n\n■ **회귀 점검 (regression check)**\n- Doc-only diff → 코드/템플릿/카탈로그 영향 없음.\n- Test count delta +5 (337→342): `5d23b74` commit log 추적 시 P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle 검증 테스트가 신규 추가된 결과. IMP-24 diff 와 독립적, regression 아님.\n- `git status` working tree 에 IMP-24 외 변경 없음 (staged 0, modified = `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` only).\n\n■ **범위 제외 재확인**\n- A-2 main 구축 (`templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` + frame partials 신규) — 별 axis, BACKLOG §3 잔존.\n- 잔여 §1 audit row direct/indirect 재검증 — 별 axis.\n- Phase Q 모듈 (`src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py`) 코드 수정 — 본 axis 무관.\n\n■ **다음 단계**\n- Stage 5 (commit + push) 진행. commit message = IMP-22 `2ace54b` / IMP-23 `447e702` 스타일 추종 (`docs(#24): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-2 column 정정`).\n- Codex 재검증 요청.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\n- `git status` → `modified: docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`; 변경 파일 1 개 (다른 modified/staged 없음).\n- `git diff --stat docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → `1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)`.\n- `git diff docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → 단일 hunk `@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@`, line 99 A-2 row candidate-file 셀만 수정 (- bare tokens / + bare tokens + `(간접 — ...)` annotation).\n- After-state line 99 직접 확인 = `| **A-2** | Catalog 확장 (frame_contracts + frame_partials) | ... | block_reference.py, block_selector.py (간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) | 높음 |`.\n- `grep -n \"block_reference\\|block_selector\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` → 14 hits; line 99 (수정) 외 lines 129/992/998/999/1001/1010/1019/1027/1030/1039/1044/1045/1053/1057/1058/1068 모두 pre-existing 본문 (unchanged).\n- `grep -n \"K6\\|IMP-24\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` → INSIGHT-MAP line 139 (K6 wording 보존), BACKLOG line 84 (IMP-24 K6 entry 보존). cross-ref 정합 유지.\n- `pytest -q tests` → `342 passed in 43.50s` (베이스라인 337 + orchestrator 신규 5; IMP-24 와 독립).\n- Recent commits: `5d23b74 fix(orchestrator): P5b first-line agent header strict + supplement throttle`, `447e702 docs(#23): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-3/A-4 html_generator 칸 정정`, `2ace54b docs(#22): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-3/A-4 renderer 칸 정정` → 본 IMP-24 가 같은 시리즈 마무리 axis.\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:15:19+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:15:19+09:00"}, {"id": 21631, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21631", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 4 test-verify review IMP-24 K6\n\nVerdict: PASS. The Stage 3 edit matches implementation unit u1 and is commit-ready.\n\nScope check:\n- PASS: tracked diff is limited to `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- PASS: the diff is one markdown table-cell correction in the Section 1 A-2 row.\n- PASS: no tracked code, template, catalog, frame partial, INSIGHT-MAP, or BACKLOG file is changed.\n- PASS: the edit requalifies `block_reference.py` and `block_selector.py` as indirect references while preserving A-2 main work as `frame_contracts.yaml` plus frame partial construction.\n\nRegression check:\n- PASS: `pytest -q tests` completed with 342 passed and 0 failed.\n- PASS: the test-count increase versus the Stage 2 baseline is not caused by this doc-only diff; the current tracked diff cannot add or remove tests.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git status --short`\n- `git diff --name-only`\n- `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `Select-String` anchor checks on `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`, and `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `pytest -q tests`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n\nTest results:\n- `pytest -q tests`: 342 passed in 41.15s.\n\nVerified facts:\n- `git diff --name-only` reports only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` as a tracked modified file.\n- `git diff --stat -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` reports 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).\n- `git diff -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` contains one hunk at the Section 1 A-2 row and changes only the candidate-file cell.\n- The after-state marks `block_reference.py` and `block_selector.py` as indirect references for catalog loading and block lookup/reference patterns.\n- The after-state keeps A-2 main work assigned to `frame_contracts.yaml` plus frame partial construction, matching the Phase Q versus Phase Z catalog-schema split.\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` Section 2.10 anchors support the correction: the files are reference-only assets, Salvage Candidate is 0, K6 closes the direct Section 1 correction axis, and A-2 is new construction.\n- Cross-reference docs are aligned and untouched: INSIGHT-MAP K6 at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md:139`, BACKLOG IMP-24 at `docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md:84`.\n- `git status --short` shows many unrelated untracked local artifacts, but they are outside the tracked IMP-24 diff and were not staged.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:17:43+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:17:43+09:00"}, {"id": 21636, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21636", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 5 commit-push — IMP-24 K6\n\n📌 **commit_sha**: `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`\n\n■ **scope-locked diff**\n- file: `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- stat: 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)\n- hunk: `@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@` (§1 audit lens A-2 row candidate-file 셀 단일 수정)\n\n■ **commit message**\n```\ndocs(#24): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-2 row candidate-file 칸 정정\n\nblock_reference.py, block_selector.py 를 간접 reference (catalog 로딩 /\nblock 검색 패턴) 로 재분류. A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials\n신규 구축 (Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) 임을 명시. §2.10 K6 + §3-A\n1242 binding SoT 와 정합. IMP-22 / IMP-23 A-3/A-4 lock 패턴 추종.\n```\n(IMP-22 `2ace54b` / IMP-23 `447e702` `docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...` style 추종.)\n\n■ **push verification**\n- `git push slide2 main` → `5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main` (Gitea `Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2`).\n- `git push origin main` → `5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main` (GitHub `keimin86/design_agent`).\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main` → `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` → `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- Local `git rev-parse HEAD` matches remote tips on both sides.\n\n■ **scope-lock invariants held**\n- 1 commit = 1 decision unit. Only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` staged via explicit file path (RULE 6, RULE 7).\n- §1 다른 row (A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5, B-*), §2.10, §3-A, §7-B, INSIGHT-MAP, BACKLOG 무변경.\n- `src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py`, `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`, frame partials 무변경.\n- No `--no-verify`, no force push, no amend.\n\n■ **다음 단계**\nStage 6 (final-close) — Gitea issue #24 close, INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 row 상태 갱신, A-2 main 구축 follow-up 분리는 별 axis.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- `git diff --staged --stat` → `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md | 2 +-` (1 file, +1/-1).\n- `git log -n 1 --stat` → commit `b1897c0`, single-file diff, message body per plan.\n- `git push slide2 main` → `5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main`.\n- `git push origin main` → `5d23b74..b1897c0 main -> main`.\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main` → `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` → `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- After-state line 99 of `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` carries `(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)`, mirroring §2.10 line 1023/1072 + §3-A line 1242 binding SoT.\n- Stage 4 baseline `pytest -q tests` = 342 passed in 43.50s; doc-only diff, no further regression run required for push step.", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:20:38+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:20:38+09:00"}, {"id": 21638, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21638", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 5 commit-push verification - IMP-24 K6\n\nStage 5 verdict: PASS\n\n- Commit SHA `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627` is local `HEAD`.\n- `slide2/main` and `origin/main` both resolve to `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- Commit scope is exactly `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`; the commit stat is 1 file changed, 1 insertion, 1 deletion.\n- The hunk is limited to the Section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell and adds the indirect-reference annotation for `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py`.\n- No unintended tracked files are included in the commit. The workspace currently has many untracked local artifacts, but `git show --name-only` for the commit lists only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- Full pytest was not rerun in Stage 5 because this stage requested push/remote verification only; Stage 4 test evidence remains the binding regression gate.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git rev-parse HEAD`\n- `git status --short`\n- `git log -n 1 --stat --pretty=fuller`\n- `git show --name-only --pretty=format: b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main`\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main`\n- `git diff b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627^ b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `git show --stat --oneline b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n\nTest results:\n- Not run in Stage 5. Stage task was remote/commit verification only.\n\nCommit SHA: `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`\n\nVerified facts:\n- Local `HEAD` equals `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- `slide2` remote `refs/heads/main` equals `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- `origin` remote `refs/heads/main` equals `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- Commit `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627` contains only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- Commit stat is 1 file changed, 1 insertion, 1 deletion.\n- Diff hunk is `@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@` and changes only the A-2 row candidate-file cell.\n- Untracked workspace files are present, but they are outside the commit and do not affect the pushed SHA.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:22:10+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:22:10+09:00"}, {"id": 21642, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21642", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Claude #1] Stage 6 final-close — IMP-24 K6\n\n■ 핵심 결정\n- IMP-24 K6 (§1 lens A-2 row candidate-file 칸 `block_reference.py` / `block_selector.py` 간접 reference 재분류) 5-stage exit-report chain 전 단계 PASS. Goal vs result 일치, origin (GitHub) / slide2 (Gitea mirror) 양쪽 모두 `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627` 으로 advance 완료.\n- 이슈 body scope 3 축 모두 충족:\n 1. `block_reference` / `block_selector` A-2 매핑 부정확 정정 → §1 line 99 셀에서 bare token 뒤 `(간접 — ...)` annotation append.\n 2. 간접 매핑 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference) 명시 → §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 phrasing mirror.\n 3. A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials 신규 구축 (Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z) 명시 → §3-A line 1242 binding SoT 와 정합.\n- Guardrail 준수: docs-only edit (`docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` 단일 파일, +1/-1, single hunk), §2.10 / §3-A / §7-B verbatim 보존, IMP-22 (`2ace54b`) / IMP-23 (`447e702`) A-3/A-4 `(간접 — <reason>)` lock 패턴 추종.\n- Cross-ref 정합 사전 확인: INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 (line 139) / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 (line 84) 모두 이미 `(간접)` SoT 와 일치 → no edit. IMP-21 (`5590ef2`) / IMP-22 (`2ace54b`) / IMP-23 (`447e702`) precedent symmetry: 동일 commit message convention (`docs(#NN): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens ...`), 동일 label retention (`needs-codex-review`), 세 선례 모두 close 완료.\n\n■ 범위 제외 (follow-up axes, 별 axis defer)\n- A-2 main 실 구축 — `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials 신규 작성 (V4 32 후보 backend 적용 가능 frame 수 3 → 32) — Stage 1 scope_lock 외, BACKLOG §3 A-2 main 별 IMP 로 잔존.\n- §1 잔여 audit row direct/indirect 재검증 — IMP-21 (B-1/B-2) / IMP-25 (B-1) 등 별 axis.\n- Source 파일 (`src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py`) — Phase Q 모듈 archive, IMP-24 boundary 외.\n- `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` K6 row (line 139) — 이미 정합, 정리 불요.\n- BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 row status `pending → done/closed` 갱신 — 별 turn axis (Stage 6 commit 무생성 원칙).\n- Untracked workspace artifacts (`.orchestrator/`, `tests/matching/*`, `samples/uploads/`, etc.) — governance / run state, commit 범위 외 유지.\n\n■ 다음 단계\n- 이슈 #24 close (IMP-21 / IMP-22 / IMP-23 precedent 일치, label `needs-codex-review` 유지).\n- BACKLOG §3 milestone \"B-3 §3 audit §1 mapping correction (5)\" 잔여 2 open (IMP-21, IMP-25) — 별 turn 진행.\n- A-2 main 실 구축 axis 는 BACKLOG §3 별 IMP 로 분리.\n\n=== EXIT REPORT (English, binding contract) ===\n\n```yaml\nissue_id: IMP-24\nstage: 6_final_close\nstatus: ready_to_close\nround: 1\n\ngoal_vs_result:\n goal:\n - docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md §1 lens A-2 candidate-file column\n bare `block_reference.py`, `block_selector.py` 토큰을 간접 reference 로\n 재분류.\n - 간접 매핑 (catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference 정도) 명시.\n - A-2 main = `frame_contracts.yaml` + frame_partials 신규 구축\n (Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z catalog schema) 명시.\n - guardrail: audit doc §1 표 정정만, 다른 axis 무관.\n - cross-ref 정합.\n result:\n - commit b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 — single file\n (docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md), numstat 1/1, single hunk at L99.\n - bare tokens 뒤 `(간접 — catalog 로딩 / block 검색 패턴 reference;\n A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml + frame_partials 신규 구축,\n Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)` annotation append.\n - §2.10 line 1023 / 1072 `(간접)` + §3-A line 1242 `A-2 = 새로 만들기`\n binding SoT 와 정합.\n - INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 (line 139) / BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 (line 84) 이미 정합 → no edit.\n - Both remotes (origin GitHub, slide2 Gitea mirror) advance to\n b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627.\n match: true\n\ncommit_verification:\n local_head: b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627\n parent: 5d23b7404edaef96e2ed44266c0b0acafe49ab0d # P5b verification commit\n origin_main: b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627\n slide2_main: b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627\n remotes_match: true\n commit_message: 'docs(#24): PHASE-Q-AUDIT §1 lens A-2 row candidate-file 칸 정정'\n files_changed: ['docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md']\n numstat: '1 1'\n hunk: '@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@'\n tracked_working_tree: clean\n\nissue_metadata:\n current_state: open\n current_labels: ['needs-codex-review']\n milestone: 'B-3 §3 audit §1 mapping correction (5)'\n predecessor_pattern:\n - '#21 closed at 2026-05-20T13:33:34+09:00 (label retained: needs-codex-review)'\n - '#22 closed at 2026-05-20T14:13:30+09:00 (label retained: needs-codex-review)'\n - '#23 closed at 2026-05-20T14:50:46+09:00 (label retained: needs-codex-review)'\n\nreview_loop_state:\n - 'Codex 1차 review: complete (Stage 1 sign-off — verdict YES)'\n - 'Claude 재검토: complete (Stage 2 plan Round #1~#4 + Stage 4 verification)'\n - 'Codex 재검증: complete (Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS + Stage 4 PASS + Stage 5 push PASS)'\n - 'scope-locked: complete (Stage 1 exit report scope_lock)'\n - 'ready-for-implementation: complete (Stage 2 exit report FINAL_CONSENSUS)'\n - 'implemented: complete (Stage 3 edit u1 + Stage 5 commit b1897c0)'\n - 'verified: complete (Stage 4 pytest 342 passed + Stage 5 dual-remote push)'\n\nclose_decision: close\n\nfollow_up_axes:\n - id: a2_main_construction\n summary: 'A-2 main = templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml +\n frame_partials 신규 구축 (V4 32 후보 backend 적용 가능 frame 수 3 → 32).'\n why_deferred: 'Stage 1 scope_lock restricted IMP-24 to §1 row A-2 cell.\n Doc-only correction precedes catalog construction axis.'\n proposed_disposition: 'Separate IMP issue under BACKLOG §3 (A-2 main\n construction axis); not yet drafted.'\n - id: section_1_residual_rows_reverification\n summary: '§1 잔여 audit row direct/indirect 재검증 — IMP-21 (B-1/B-2),\n IMP-25 (B-1) 등 별 axis.'\n why_deferred: 'Distinct rows / distinct §2 SoT lenses. IMP-24 K6 closes\n only A-2.'\n proposed_disposition: 'Continue B-3 milestone processing (IMP-21 / IMP-25\n remain open).'\n - id: backlog_imp_24_status_update\n summary: 'BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 row status `pending → done/closed` 갱신.'\n why_deferred: 'Stage 6 close-only axis; separate doc-update turn matches\n precedent for IMP-21 / IMP-22 / IMP-23.'\n proposed_disposition: 'Separate doc-only turn or batch update with other\n closed B-3 milestone issues.'\n - id: insight_map_k6_row\n summary: 'PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md K6 row (line 139) already in\n sync — no cleanup needed.'\n why_deferred: 'Already aligned, listed for completeness.'\n proposed_disposition: 'No action required.'\n\nguardrails:\n - No code edit (`src/block_reference.py`, `src/block_selector.py` untouched).\n - No §2.10 (line 1002–1089) / §3-A (line 1242) / §7-B text drift.\n - No INSIGHT-MAP §4 K6 row (line 139) edit.\n - No BACKLOG §3 IMP-24 row (line 84) edit (deferred to follow-up turn).\n - No catalog YAML / frame partial edit (A-2 main axis, deferred).\n - No new commits beyond b1897c0.\n - Label `needs-codex-review` retained, mirroring IMP-21 / IMP-22 / IMP-23.\n - Close action is the only state change in Stage 6 Round #1.\n\nevidence:\n - command: 'git rev-parse HEAD'\n value: 'b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627'\n - command: 'git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main'\n value: 'b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627\trefs/heads/main'\n - command: 'git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main'\n value: 'b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627\trefs/heads/main'\n - command: 'git show --stat b1897c0'\n value: '1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) — docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md'\n - command: 'sed -n 99p docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md'\n value: '§1 A-2 row candidate-file cell ends with `(간접 — catalog 로딩 /\n block 검색 패턴 reference; A-2 main = frame_contracts.yaml +\n frame_partials 신규 구축, Phase Q catalog schema ≠ Phase Z)`'\n - api: 'GET /repos/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24'\n value: 'state=open, labels=[needs-codex-review], milestone=B-3 §3 audit\n §1 mapping correction (5)'\n - api: 'GET /repos/.../issues/21|22|23'\n value: '#21 closed 2026-05-20T13:33:34+09:00; #22 closed\n 2026-05-20T14:13:30+09:00; #23 closed 2026-05-20T14:50:46+09:00; all\n three retained label needs-codex-review.'\n\nsource_comment_ids:\n - Claude #1 (Stage 6 final-close round 1)\n\ncommit_sha:\n imp_24_commit: b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627\n push_state: dual-remote synced (origin + slide2)\n\nready_for_close: true\n```\n", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:26:42+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:26:42+09:00"}, {"id": 21644, "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24#issuecomment-21644", "pull_request_url": "", "issue_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/24", "user": {"id": 28, "login": "Kyeongmin", "login_name": "", "source_id": 0, "full_name": "이경민", "email": "kyeongmin@noreply.localhost", "avatar_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e", "html_url": "https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin", "language": "", "is_admin": false, "last_login": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "created": "2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00", "restricted": false, "active": false, "prohibit_login": false, "location": "", "website": "", "description": "", "visibility": "public", "followers_count": 0, "following_count": 0, "starred_repos_count": 1, "username": "Kyeongmin"}, "original_author": "", "original_author_id": 0, "body": "[Codex #1] Stage 6 final-close review IMP-24 K6\n\nVerdict: PASS. I independently verified the Stage 5 commit, remote state, single-file scope, and the named cross-reference anchors. The implementation matches the issue scope: the PHASE-Q-AUDIT section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell now classifies `block_reference.py` and `block_selector.py` as indirect references, and keeps A-2 main construction on `frame_contracts.yaml` plus frame partials.\n\nScope-qualified findings:\n- Commit `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627` is local `HEAD` and both `slide2/main` and `origin/main` point to the same SHA.\n- The commit touches only `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`, with one hunk and `1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)`.\n- The changed row is section 1 A-2 only. The after-state says the two Phase Q files are indirect references for catalog loading / block lookup patterns, and states that A-2 main work is `frame_contracts.yaml` + `frame_partials` new construction with a Phase Q vs Phase Z catalog schema split.\n- The supporting SoT anchors remain aligned: `PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md` section 2.10 has A-2 as indirect, Salvage Candidate 0, K6 as the factual note, and section 3-A says A-2 is new construction. `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` K6 already matches this interpretation.\n- `PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md` still has IMP-24 marked `pending`; I treat that as non-blocking for this final-close verification because the binding Stage 5/6 reports explicitly defer backlog status updates to a separate follow-up axis, outside the single commit scope.\n- No full pytest run was performed in Stage 6, per the current-stage instruction not to run full pytest unless explicitly required. Stage 4 test evidence remains the binding regression evidence.\n\nDecision: close OK. No rewind target is required.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `git rev-parse HEAD`\n- `git status --short`\n- `git log -n 1 --pretty=fuller --stat`\n- `git show --name-only --pretty=format:%H%n%s b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`\n- `git diff --stat b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627^ b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `git diff b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627^ b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627 -- docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `git ls-remote slide2 refs/heads/main`\n- `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main`\n- `rg -n \"A-2|block_reference|block_selector|Salvage Candidate|K6|frame_contracts|frame_partials|IMP-24\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `rg -n \"K6|block_reference|block_selector|IMP-24|A-2\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `rg -n \"IMP-24|A-2|block_reference|block_selector\" docs/architecture/PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n- `git diff --name-only HEAD`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md`\n- `D:\\ad-hoc\\kei\\design_agent\\docs\\architecture\\PHASE-Z-IMPLEMENTATION-ISSUE-BACKLOG.md`\n\nTest results:\n- Stage 6: not run by instruction.\n- Binding prior evidence: Stage 4 reported `pytest -q tests` as `342 passed`.\n\nVerified facts:\n- Local `HEAD` = `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- `slide2/main` = `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- `origin/main` = `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`.\n- Commit `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627` changes only `docs/architecture/PHASE-Q-AUDIT.md`.\n- Commit stat is `1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)`.\n- The sole hunk is the section 1 A-2 candidate-file cell.\n- `git diff --name-only HEAD` is empty, so there are no tracked unstaged changes after the commit; untracked local artifacts remain outside commit scope.\n- Cross-reference anchor K6 in `PHASE-Q-INSIGHT-TO-22STEP-MAP.md` matches the indirect-reference interpretation.\n- BACKLOG IMP-24 remains `pending`; this is recorded as a deferred status-update axis, not a scope failure for the doc-only correction.\n\nCommit SHA: `b1897c01bce45c72ef234e9c50084c76394a5627`\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES", "assets": [], "created_at": "2026-05-20T17:28:44+09:00", "updated_at": "2026-05-20T17:28:44+09:00"}] |