[{"id":22183,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22183","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #1] Stage 1 problem-review β IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames\n\nπ Stage 1 Round #1 β pre-flight 4-axis baseline + scope-lock proposal\n\n=== PRE-FLIGHT 4-AXIS BASELINE READ ===\n\n| axis | path:lines | verified fact |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104` | `split_source` allows exactly `top_bullets` / `h3_subsections`. Any new frame must declare one of these or raise `ValueError`. |\n| 2 | `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{frame_id}/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}` | source 4-layer convention verified. 11 contracted frames have all 4 layers (F13 lacks `assets/`). visual-pending frames lack `index.html` + `assets/`. |\n| 3 | `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:206-265` (`ITEM_PARSERS` registry) | 3 named parsers β `pillar_item` (F13), `quadrant_item` (F16 + reused by F14/F17/F11/F18/F20/F28), `compare_row_2col_item` (F18-style). New parsers required only if pattern not in registry. |\n| 4 | `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:486-543` | argparse = positional `template_id` + `--self-check` + `--payload \u003cpath\u003e` + `--render-to \u003cDIR\u003e` (R3 acceptance gate). |\n\n=== BASELINE STATE (factual, value+path+upstream) ===\n\n| metric | value | source |\n|---|---|---|\n| `frame_contracts.yaml` top-level keys | **11** | `grep -n \"^[a-z][a-z_]*:\" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` |\n| tracked family partials | **11** | `git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html` (per `_WIP_FILES.md` baseline 2026-05-19) |\n| disk family partials | **13** | tracked 11 + WIP 2 β `_WIP_FILES.md` L13 |\n| WIP partials (untracked, uncontracted) | **2** | `app_sw_package_vs_solution.html` (F23 / `1171281203`), `pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html` (F9 / `1171281180`) β `_WIP_FILES.md` Β§\"WIP family templates\" |\n| `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/*` dirs | **33** | `ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/` (excl. `layouts.yaml`). `1171281171` has only `texts.md` (no `analysis.md`/assets) β likely the 33rd non-target dir; V4 evidence file = 32 unique template_ids |\n| smoke `--self-check` | **PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2** | `python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check` (the 2 SKIPs = WIP partials with no bundled fixture) |\n| `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` | **2 passed** | invariant: tracked family files β `frame_contracts.yaml` keys set-equal modulo `_WIP_FILES.md` allowlist |\n| IMP-04 milestone close | `73a98b8` (F17 = `bim_current_problems_paired`, Track A 8/16) | `git log --grep=\"Track A\"` |\n\nβ guardrail \"Smoke 11/11+ PASS β IMP-04 F17 calibration regression 0\" is currently **green**. IMP-04b must preserve this on every commit.\n\n=== SCOPE-LOCK CLARIFICATIONS NEEDED ===\n\n**Q1 β Track A \"μμ¬ 5\" vs matrix \"9 remaining reusable-now\"** (numerical discrepancy)\n\nIssue body: `Track A μμ¬ 5 + Track B 12 + Track C 1 = 18`. But scope summary says `target = remaining 21/32 frames (active 11/32 β 32/32)` β 32-11 = 21.\n\n`docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md` Β§3.1 lists **16 reusable-now**; commits `Track A 1/16 ~ 8/16` activated 8 (one of which = F14 refinement, already-active). Cross-checked against catalog: of the Β§3.1 16 frames, **9 are not yet contracted**:\n\n| # | template_id | frame_id | proposed builder (matrix Β§5) | source 4-layer | WIP partial already? |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `app_sw_package_vs_solution` | 1171281203 | new `compare_table_2col` | A T I F S | **yes** (R3 partial committed-as-WIP) |\n| 2 | `bigroom_system_components` | 1171281178 | reuse `process_product_pair` or new | A T I F S | no |\n| 3 | `bim_adoption_central_split` | 1171281208 | new `central_split_synthesis` | A T I F S | no |\n| 4 | `engn_sw_three_types` | 1171281204 | new `compare_table_3col` (h3_subsections) | A T I F S | no |\n| 5 | `model_specialized_engn_sw` | 1171281202 | new `split_panel` | A T I F S | no |\n| 6 | `overseas_bim_numbered_list` | 1171281174 | `items_with_role` variant (numbered) | A T I F S | no |\n| 7 | `pre_construction_model_info_stacked` | 1171281180 | reuse `items_with_role` (flexible card) | A T I F S | **yes** (R3 partial committed-as-WIP) |\n| 8 | `solution_engn_split_diagram` | 1171281201 | new `split_panel` | A T I F S | no |\n| 9 | `sw_development_cycle_six_nodes` | 1171281172 | new `circular_nodes_n` | A T I F S | no |\n\nβ Track A actual remaining = **9 frames (not 5)**. Need user lock on either (a) tighten Track A to a specific 5 subset and defer 4 to a follow-up axis, or (b) correct issue body scope to \"Track A μμ¬ 9 + Track B 12 = 21\". The 3-frame phrasing-vs-target gap should not silently propagate into Stage 2 plan.\n\n**Q2 β 2 WIP partials = Track A scope or Track B-adjacent fast lane?**\n\n`_WIP_FILES.md` L5 explicitly states: \"Gate for promote/remove: Gitea issue #42\". The 2 WIP files (`app_sw_package_vs_solution.html`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html`) already have R3 partials authored but are NOT in `frame_contracts.yaml`. Promotion = 4 deltas per file:\n\n1. add entry to `frame_contracts.yaml` (incl. SPEC v1 Β§3 `accepted_content_types` + `sub_zones`)\n2. register builder name in `PAYLOAD_BUILDERS` (if new) β matrix Β§5.3 says `app_sw_package_vs_solution` needs new `compare_table_2col`\n3. bundle a `SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES` payload in `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py` so smoke flips from SKIP β PASS\n4. remove from `_WIP_FILES.md` WIP allowlist + verify `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` still 2 passed\n\nβ recommend these 2 be the **first batch** of IMP-04b: largest \"head-start\", lowest risk, exercises the promote/remove protocol that `_WIP_FILES.md` was designed to gate.\n\n**Q3 β Track C \"1 matching schema canonical\" scope-in or scope-out?**\n\n`IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md` Β§4 Track C: \"λ³Έ matrix scope μΈ. IMP-05+ λλ λ³ architectural axis λ‘ μ΄μ.\" IMP-05 (#5) already closed (per issue body `15c5b9a/21476ae/23d1b25`). Issue #42 body offers two paths (\"Track C 1 matching schema canonical (or separate IMP axis if scope grow)\"). Recommend **explicit out-of-scope for IMP-04b** unless user override β matching authority belongs to V4, not Phase Z runtime catalog (memory `project_design_agent_status.md`).\n\n**Q4 β New builder pattern entry per frame = own scope-lock axis?**\n\nMatrix Β§5.3 lists 7+ new builders for the 9 remaining Track A: `compare_table_2col`, `compare_table_3col`, `cycle_intersect_3` (already done?), `split_panel`, `circular_nodes_n`, `paired_rows_2x2` (done as F17), `central_split_synthesis`. Per IMP-04 Fix 5 \"review granularity\":\n\n\u003e μ builder pattern λμ
frame = Codex review νμ\n\nβ each new builder = its own batch with full F1/F2 deep review, NOT folded into the \"baseline/smoke batch (~3-5 round)\" cadence. Suggest the issue distinguishes upfront between (a) **builder-introducing** frames (deep review) and (b) **builder-reusing** frames (checklist short-review).\n\n**Q5 β RULE 0 PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION + sample budget guardrail**\n\nEach new contract must work for **all 32 frames** (= general Phase Z pipeline), not just whichever MDX surfaces the test fixture. Memory `feedback_sample_budget.md` warns: \"regression fix step μ λ―Έμ¬μ© μν λΌμ°μ§ λ§ κ² β fresh first-encounter μ νΈ λ³΄νΈ\". Verification approach proposal:\n\n- per-frame fixture in `SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES` = **structural sufficiency check** (StrictUndefined cap), not generalization proof.\n- generalization signal = V4 evidence file `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml` (already produced by V4 against 320 judgments). New contracts should map cleanly to one of the 32 source-truth shapes there.\n- explicit non-goal for IMP-04b: do not introduce per-MDX hardcoded source fixtures that pretend to be generalization tests.\n\n=== 6-GROUP CLASSIFICATION β APPLIED ===\n\nMapping the 9 Track A candidates against the issue body's 6-group taxonomy (source 4-layer fit-class):\n\n| group | meaning | candidates (Track A remaining 9) |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1. F2 schema/cardinality correction | cardinality / slot structure mismatch | (none expected β visual base verified for all 9) |\n| 2. F1.5 sourceβruntime mapping | source structure known, runtime projection flattens | `engn_sw_three_types` (h3_subsections β table-3col), `bim_adoption_central_split` (central split synthesis) |\n| 3. F1 visual/style refinement | structure OK, typography/color/rhythm gap | `app_sw_package_vs_solution`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked` (WIP partials authored, refinement pass) |\n| 4. asset-promotion required | figma_to_html assets carry visual identity | `sw_development_cycle_six_nodes` (circular nodes β likely SVG asset), `solution_engn_split_diagram` (split panel) |\n| 5. baseline/smoke batch | checklist pass + mismatch zero | `bigroom_system_components`, `overseas_bim_numbered_list`, `model_specialized_engn_sw` (subject to per-frame analysis) |\n| 6. source-recheck required | analysis.md β texts.md / index.html / assets conflict | (none upfront β F17 = baseline; surfaces only during deep review) |\n\nβ deep-review 1 representative per group (per issue body): groups 2/3/4 each take 1 deep review, groups 5 short checklist. Group 1/6 = on-demand only if encountered.\n\n=== SCOPE-LOCK PROPOSAL (Stage 1 β Stage 2) ===\n\n**Recommended scope-lock (subject to user Q1 answer)**:\n\n1. **In-scope**: Track A μμ¬ 9 (all Β§3.1 reusable-now not yet contracted) + Track B 12 visual-pending = 21 frames. Matches `target = remaining 21/32`.\n2. **Out-of-scope**: Track C (matching schema canonical) β defer to separate IMP axis per matrix Β§4. Re-affirm V4 = matching authority / Phase Z = runtime projection (memory `project_design_agent_status.md`).\n3. **First batch (deep-review calibration)**: the 2 WIP partials (`app_sw_package_vs_solution`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`) β exercises the promote/remove protocol of `_WIP_FILES.md` + tests `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` invariant + flips smoke SKIP β PASS for both.\n4. **Builder taxonomy gate**: distinguish builder-introducing frames (deep review per Fix 5) from builder-reusing frames (short checklist) at Stage 2 plan time.\n5. **Track B treatment**: visual-pending 12 = `figma_to_html_agent` re-run required before catalog entry. Stage 2 should isolate the \"extraction pre-req\" sub-axis from the \"catalog registration\" sub-axis (Track B = NOT immediate activation).\n\n**Guardrails accepted from issue body**:\n- β
no `calculate_fit` migration (memory `feedback_phase_z_qy_framing.md`)\n- β
no AI / Kei API call in per-frame work (memory `feedback_ai_isolation_contract.md` PZ-1)\n- β
no 1-2 sample hardcoding (memory `feedback_sample_budget.md` + RULE 7)\n- β
no production refactor for tests (IMP-32 owns helper extract)\n- β
V4 / figma_to_html / Phase Z 3-layer architecture preserved\n- β
smoke 11/11+ PASS regression 0 (currently green β verified)\n\n**Additional guardrails (proposed)**:\n- β
each commit = 1 frame promotion OR 1 builder introduction (memory `feedback_workflow_atomicity_rules.md`: 1 commit = 1 decision unit)\n- β
WIP-partial promotion = strict 4-delta protocol (Q2) β fail-fast if any delta missing\n- β
generalization signal sourced from `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml`, NOT from per-frame ad-hoc fixtures\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\ncommands run:\n- `Read templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` (200 lines + grep top-level keys β 11 entries)\n- `Read templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md` (verified 11 contracted + 2 WIP, gate-keyword `Gitea issue #42`)\n- `Read docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md` (lines 1-299 β Β§1 stats, Β§3.1 16 reusable-now, Β§3.2 12 visual-pending, Β§4 tracks, Β§5 builders, Β§7 resource completeness)\n- `Read src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104, 206-265` (split_source allow-list + ITEM_PARSERS registry)\n- `Read scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:480-547` (argparse + --render-to mode)\n- `Bash ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/ β 33 dirs, all 9 Track-A-remaining template_ids confirmed present with full A T I F S`\n- `Bash git log --grep=\"Track A\"` β confirmed Track A 1/16 ~ 8/16 commits + F17 milestone close at `73a98b8`\n- `Bash python -m pytest -q tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` β 2 passed\n- `Bash python scripts/smoke_frame_render.py --self-check` β PASS=11 FAIL=0 SKIP=2\n\nfacts verified (path:line basis):\n- catalog count: 11 (path `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`)\n- WIP gate keyword: `Gitea issue #42` (path `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md` L5)\n- matrix Track A reusable-now: 16 (path `docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md` Β§3.1)\n- IMP-04 close commit: `73a98b8` (`git show --stat`)\n- numerical discrepancy: issue body `5+12+1=18` vs `target = 21` (=32-11) β 3-frame gap\n\nunknowns surfaced (not assumed):\n- exact 5 frames intended by issue body \"Track A μμ¬ 5\" (vs my read of 9) β Q1\n- whether Track C is in-scope this issue or split β Q3\n- batch boundary between builder-introducing vs builder-reusing frames β Q4\n\nAwaiting user / Codex review on Q1βQ5 before Stage 2 plan. Stage 1 baseline-read complete; smoke 11/11 + family contract test green.\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T03:35:44+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T03:35:44+09:00"},{"id":22186,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22186","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #1] Stage 1 problem-review verification - IMP-04b\n\nStage 1 is not scope-locked as written. Claude's pre-flight baseline is mostly verified, but the issue body contains a frame-count error that must be corrected before planning.\n\n=== VERIFIED BASELINE ===\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104` accepts only `top_bullets` and `h3_subsections`; unsupported `source_shape` raises `ValueError`.\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265` registers exactly `pillar_item`, `quadrant_item`, and `compare_row_2col_item` in `ITEM_PARSERS`.\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:500-543` has positional `template_id`, `--self-check`, `--payload`, and `--render-to`.\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` has 11 top-level contract keys.\n- `git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html` returns 11 tracked family partials.\n- Disk has 13 family partials; `_WIP_FILES.md` names the 2 extra WIP files as `app_sw_package_vs_solution.html` and `pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html`.\n- `figma_to_html_agent/blocks` has 33 directories. `1171281171` has only `texts.md`; it is the extra non-target block relative to the 32-frame V4 evidence.\n- `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml` exists and contains 320 `template_id:` judgments over 32 unique template IDs.\n\n=== WRONG ASSUMPTIONS / MISSING SCOPE LOCK ===\n- The issue body says Track A remaining 5 + Track B 12 + Track C 1, but this does not reconcile with active 11/32 or the matrix. `docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md:111-130` lists 16 reusable-now frames; Track A commits have activated/refined through 8/16, with 7 new reusable-now activations after the already-active F14 refinement. Therefore the remaining frame work is 9 reusable-now + 12 visual-pending = 21 frames.\n- Track C \"1 matching schema canonical\" must be treated as a non-frame axis unless it explicitly grows scope. Counting it as a frame makes the arithmetic wrong.\n- The source-layer claim needs precise wording: contracted frames do not all have a complete 4-layer source package because `1171281190` / F13 lacks `assets/`. The verified statement is \"all 11 contracted frames have `analysis.md`, `texts.md`, and `index.html`; 10/11 have `assets/`.\"\n- Visual-pending should stay at 12 frames per `docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md:132-147`; among them `1171281206` has `assets/` but lacks `index.html`, matching the matrix's `A T - F -` exception.\n\n=== SCOPE-LOCK PROPOSAL ===\n- Correct target: active 11/32 to 32/32.\n- Frame implementation scope: 21 frames total.\n- Track A remaining: 9 reusable-now frames, not 5.\n- Track B remaining: 12 visual-pending frames.\n- Track C: separate schema/canonicalization axis; do not add it to frame count unless a later review explicitly expands scope.\n- Per-frame entry must keep the 4-axis pre-flight read and the six failure classes from the issue body.\n- No `calculate_fit` migration, no AI/Kei API calls, no sample hardcoding, no production refactor for tests.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `rg -n \"split_source|top_bullets|h3_subsections|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item\" src/phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `rg -n \"template_id|self-check|render-to|payload|argparse|add_argument\" scripts/smoke_frame_render.py`\n- `rg -n \"^[a-z][a-z_]*:\" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`\n- `git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html`\n- `Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'templates\\phase_z2\\families' -Filter '*.html'`\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath 'templates\\phase_z2\\families\\_WIP_FILES.md'`\n- `Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\\blocks' -Directory`\n- `Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath 'figma_to_html_agent\\blocks' -Directory | ForEach-Object { layer existence scan }`\n- `rg -n \"reusable-now|Track A|117128|template_id|32|16\" docs\\architecture\\IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md`\n- `rg -n \"^## section|^## μ§ 2|^## μ§ 3|^### μ§ 3\\.1|^### μ§ 3\\.2|^### Track A|?λΆΏλΏ¬ 11|all 16|Track B|visual-pending 12|ο§λ±λ ?μ꽦|32-frame scope\" docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md`\n- `git log --oneline --grep=\"Track A\" --all -n 20`\n- `Select-String -Path 'tests\\matching\\v4_full32_result.yaml' -Pattern 'template_id:'`\n- `git status --short`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py`\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md`\n- `docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md`\n- `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml`\n- `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/*/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}`\n\nTest results:\n- Not run. Current stage says \"grep/find\" and \"NO pytest\"; I did repository inspection only.\n\nrewind_target: stage_1_review\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T03:38:51+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T03:38:51+09:00"},{"id":22188,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22188","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #2] Stage 1 problem-review β IMP-04b catalog extension β Round #1 rewind response\n\nCodex #1 rewind reason: issue body frame-count math (`Track A 5 + Track B 12 + Track C 1 = 18`) β stated `remaining 21/32`. Resolving as corrected scope-lock below.\n\n=== PRE-FLIGHT 4-AXIS BASELINE (re-verified) ===\n\n| axis | path:lines | verified fact |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104` | `split_source` allows exactly `top_bullets` / `h3_subsections`; other values β `ValueError`. |\n| 2 | `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{frame_id}/` | 33 dirs on disk. 32 valid frame source dirs (matches V4 evidence). `1171281171` = extra non-target (only `texts.md`, no `analysis.md` / `index.html` / `assets/`). Per matrix Β§1, 20/32 have `index.html`; 12 lack it (= Track B visual-pending). |\n| 3 | `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265` | `ITEM_PARSERS = {pillar_item, quadrant_item, compare_row_2col_item}` β exactly 3 keys. |\n| 4 | `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543` | argparse = positional `template_id` (nargs='?') + `--self-check` + `--payload \u003cpath\u003e` + `--render-to \u003cDIR\u003e`. **Line-range correction**: issue body cites `:486-500` which is `_cmd_one` payload sourcing, not argparse. Codex baseline cites `:500-543`. Adopt `:499-543` going forward. |\n\nSurface counts (factual, value+path+upstream) :\n\n| metric | value | source |\n|---|---|---|\n| `frame_contracts.yaml` top-level keys | **11** | `grep \"^[a-z][a-z_]*:\" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` |\n| tracked family partials | **11** | `git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html` |\n| disk family partials | **13** | tracked 11 + WIP 2 β `_WIP_FILES.md` \"Baseline lock (2026-05-19)\" |\n| WIP partials (uncontracted) | **2** | `app_sw_package_vs_solution.html` (F23 / `1171281203`), `pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html` (F9 / `1171281180`) β `_WIP_FILES.md` L20-21 |\n| V4 evidence judgments | **320** over **32** template_ids | `grep -c \"template_id:\" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml` |\n| `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/*` dirs | **33** | `ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/` excl. `layouts.yaml` |\n\nβ guardrail \"Smoke 11/11+ PASS β IMP-04 F17 calibration regression 0\" baseline anchored at commit `73a98b8` (F17 close).\n\n=== CORRECTED MATH (issue body wrong) ===\n\nIssue body: `Track A μμ¬ 5 frames + Track B 12 + Track C 1 ... target = remaining 21/32`.\n\nTwo errors :\n\n**Error (a)** β arithmetic. 5 + 12 + 1 = **18**, not 21.\n\n**Error (b)** β category confusion. Track C is **not a frame**. Per `docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md` Β§4 Track C β \"Matching schema canonical decision\" = **architectural axis** (V4 = canonical matching authority / figma_to_html = source evidence / Phase Z = runtime projection / bridge layer = explicit conversion). Matrix explicitly: \"λ³Έ matrix scope μΈ. IMP-05 λλ λ³ architectural axis λ‘ μ΄μ\". Counting it as 1 frame conflates count-bearing surface (frames) with axis-bearing surface (matching schema). Memory `project_design_agent_status.md` reinforces: matching authority = V4, NOT Phase Z runtime catalog.\n\n**Corrected math (matrix-anchored)** :\n\n| group | matrix source | count | done | remaining |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| ACTIVE 4 (pre-IMP-04) | Β§2 | 4 | 4 | 0 |\n| Track A reusable-now | Β§3.1 | 16 | 7 | **9** |\n| Track B visual-pending | Β§3.2 | 12 | 0 | **12** |\n| Track C matching schema | Β§4 (axis, not frame) | n/a | n/a | **excluded** |\n| **frame total** | | **32** | **11** | **21** |\n\n9 + 12 = **21** β matches 32 β 11.\n\n**Track A done 7** (during IMP-04, in addition to 4 original ACTIVE) :\n\n1. `construction_goals_three_circle_intersection` (F12)\n2. `construction_bim_three_usage` (F11)\n3. `bim_dx_comparison_table` (F18)\n4. `dx_sw_necessity_three_perspectives` (F20)\n5. `info_management_what_how_when` (F8)\n6. `sw_reality_three_emphasis` (F28)\n7. `bim_current_problems_paired` (F17 β IMP-04 calibration close, `73a98b8`)\n\n**Track A remaining 9** (Β§3.1 reusable-now β 7 done) :\n\n| # | template_id | frame_id | proposed builder (matrix Β§5) | WIP partial? |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `app_sw_package_vs_solution` | 1171281203 | new `compare_table_2col` | **yes** |\n| 2 | `bigroom_system_components` | 1171281178 | reuse `process_product_pair` or new | no |\n| 3 | `bim_adoption_central_split` | 1171281208 | new `central_split_synthesis` | no |\n| 4 | `engn_sw_three_types` | 1171281204 | new `compare_table_3col` (only `h3_subsections` candidate) | no |\n| 5 | `model_specialized_engn_sw` | 1171281202 | new `split_panel` | no |\n| 6 | `overseas_bim_numbered_list` | 1171281174 | `items_with_role` variant (numbered) | no |\n| 7 | `pre_construction_model_info_stacked` | 1171281180 | reuse `items_with_role` (flexible card) | **yes** |\n| 8 | `solution_engn_split_diagram` | 1171281201 | new `split_panel` | no |\n| 9 | `sw_development_cycle_six_nodes` | 1171281172 | new `circular_nodes_n` | no |\n\n**Track B remaining 12** (Β§3.2 visual-pending, `index.html` absent β resource status `A T - - -` except `sw_dependency_four_problems` which is `A T - F -`) :\n\n`commercial_sw_four_categories` (F25), `compensation_complaint_map` (F6), `compensation_complaint_side_card` (F5), `design_method_distortion_three_col` (F19), `domestic_bim_actor_relations` (F4), `engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge` (F2), `field_effectiveness_five_elements` (F10), `industry_characteristics_three_col` (F31), `industry_current_status_three_col` (F30), `policy_achievement_five_goals` (F32), `policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements` (F15), `sw_dependency_four_problems` (F26).\n\nTrack B activation requires figma_to_html agent re-run OR explicit minimal-CSS placeholder (matrix Β§4 option (a)/(b)/(c)). Within IMP-04b, each Track B frame must be **classified into group 4 (asset-promotion) or group 6 (source-recheck) before any contract registration**.\n\n=== CORRECTED SCOPE-LOCK ===\n\n**Frame scope** = exactly **21 frames** (9 Track A + 12 Track B).\n\n**Track C** = **explicitly excluded** as a frame-counting scope axis. If matching schema canonical work surfaces during per-frame work (e.g., V4 β figma_to_html mapping issue per Codex #15477 4-class taxonomy), open a separate IMP axis β do **not** widen #42 scope.\n\n**Per-frame pre-flight 4-axis read** (unchanged, line-range fix to axis 4) :\n1. `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104` β `split_source` allow-list\n2. `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{frame_id}/{analysis.md, texts.md, index.html, assets/}` β 4 source layers (assets/ + index.html may be absent for Track B)\n3. `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:206-265` β `ITEM_PARSERS` (pillar / quadrant / compare_row_2col)\n4. `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543` β argparse (corrected from `:486-500`)\n\n**6-group classification** (retained from issue body) :\n\n| group | meaning | initial assignment (Track A 9) |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1. F2 schema/cardinality | source unit count or slot structure mismatch | (none expected β visual base verified) |\n| 2. F1.5 sourceβruntime mapping | source structure known, runtime projection flattens | `engn_sw_three_types` (h3_subsections β table-3col), `bim_adoption_central_split` (central split synthesis) |\n| 3. F1 visual/style refinement | structure OK, typography / color / rhythm gap | `app_sw_package_vs_solution`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked` (WIP partials authored, refinement pass) |\n| 4. asset-promotion required | figma_to_html assets carry visual identity | `sw_development_cycle_six_nodes` (circular nodes), `solution_engn_split_diagram` (split panel) |\n| 5. baseline/smoke batch | checklist pass + mismatch zero | `bigroom_system_components`, `overseas_bim_numbered_list`, `model_specialized_engn_sw` (subject to per-frame analysis) |\n| 6. source-recheck required | `analysis.md` β `texts.md` / `index.html` / `assets` conflict | (on-demand only β F17 = group 1 baseline rep) |\n\nTrack B 12 frames classify into group 4 (asset-promotion) or group 6 (source-recheck) once entered.\n\n**Batch strategy** (retained) :\n- Deep-review 1 representative per group encountered (F17 = group 1 baseline already paid in IMP-04).\n- Rest = short checklist review (~3-5 round per frame target).\n- New failure class β pause + define once + resume batch (issue body protocol inherit).\n\n**WIP file promote/remove gate** (matrix-anchored, `_WIP_FILES.md` L5) :\n\nThe 2 WIP files (`app_sw_package_vs_solution`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`) are both in Track A 9. Per `_WIP_FILES.md` \"Gate for promote/remove: Gitea issue #42\", IMP-04b closes this gate. Promote path = 4 deltas per file :\n\n1. Add entry to `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` (incl. SPEC v1 Β§3 `accepted_content_types` + `sub_zones`)\n2. Register builder in `PAYLOAD_BUILDERS` (matrix Β§5.3: `app_sw_package_vs_solution` needs new `compare_table_2col`; `pre_construction_model_info_stacked` reuses `items_with_role`)\n3. Bundle a `SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES` payload in `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py` so smoke flips SKIP β PASS\n4. Remove from `_WIP_FILES.md` WIP allowlist; verify `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py` still 2 passed\n\nRecommend these 2 as **first batch** of IMP-04b β exercises promote/remove protocol, lowest risk, largest head-start (R3 partials already authored).\n\n**Guardrails accepted from issue body (preserved)** :\n- β
no `calculate_fit` migration\n- β
no AI / Kei API call in per-frame work (memory `feedback_ai_isolation_contract.md` PZ-1)\n- β
no 1-2 sample hardcoding (memory `feedback_sample_budget.md` + RULE 7)\n- β
no production refactor for tests (IMP-32 owns helper extract)\n- β
V4 / figma_to_html / Phase Z 3-layer architecture preserved (V4 = matching authority / figma_to_html = source evidence / Phase Z = runtime projection)\n- β
Smoke 11/11+ PASS β F17 calibration regression 0\n\n**Additional guardrails proposed (memory-anchored)** :\n- β
each commit = 1 frame promotion OR 1 builder introduction (memory `feedback_workflow_atomicity_rules.md`: 1 commit = 1 decision unit)\n- β
WIP-partial promotion = strict 4-delta protocol β fail-fast if any delta missing\n- β
generalization signal sourced from `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml` (320 judgments, 32 template_ids), NOT per-frame ad-hoc fixtures\n- β
new builder introduction = Codex review required (IMP-04 Fix 5 review granularity); builder reuse = short checklist review\n\n**RULE 0 PIPELINE-CONSTRUCTION compliance** : each new contract must generalize against all 32 frames, not the test fixture alone. Per-frame `SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES` entries = structural sufficiency check (StrictUndefined cap), not generalization proof. Generalization signal comes from V4 evidence.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n\nCommands run :\n- `Read templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` (grep top-level keys β 11)\n- `Read templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md` (verified gate keyword \"Gitea issue #42\" L5)\n- `Read docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md` Β§1-Β§8 (16 reusable-now / 12 visual-pending / 4 ACTIVE / 7+ new builders)\n- `Read src/phase_z2_mapper.py:90-104, 258-266` (split_source allow-list + ITEM_PARSERS registry)\n- `Read scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:480-548` (argparse + --render-to mode)\n- `Bash ls figma_to_html_agent/blocks/` β 33 dirs, `1171281171` confirmed extra (only `texts.md`)\n- `Bash git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html` β 11 tracked\n- `Bash ls templates/phase_z2/families/*.html` β 13 on disk (2 WIP confirmed)\n- `Bash grep -c \"template_id:\" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml` β 320 judgments\n- `Bash grep \"template_id:\" ... | awk '{print $NF}' | sort -u | wc -l` β 32 unique template_ids\n- `Bash git log --oneline -20` β recent commit history including IMP-29/30/31/32 closes\n\nFacts verified (value + path + upstream) :\n- catalog count = 11 (`templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` top-level)\n- WIP gate keyword = \"Gitea issue #42\" (`templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md` L5)\n- matrix Track A reusable-now total = 16 (`docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md` Β§3.1)\n- matrix Track B visual-pending total = 12 (`...` Β§3.2)\n- matrix Track C scope = architectural axis, not a frame (`...` Β§4 Track C)\n- IMP-04 close commit = `73a98b8` (F17 calibration; `git log` matches issue body claim)\n- Track A done 7 = cross-checked between catalog 11 and matrix Β§2 ACTIVE 4 β 11 β 4 = 7 Track A activations\n\nUnknowns surfaced :\n- exact 5 frames intended by issue body \"Track A μμ¬ 5\" β **resolved as bug**: issue body math wrong, correct value = 9 (matrix-anchored)\n- whether Track C is in-scope β **resolved**: out-of-scope (architectural axis, not a frame; matrix Β§4 defers to IMP-05+ or separate axis)\n- batch ordering between builder-introducing vs builder-reusing frames β deferred to Stage 2 plan\n\nAwaiting Codex re-review of corrected scope-lock before Stage 2 simulation-plan.\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T03:44:48+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T03:44:48+09:00"},{"id":22191,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22191","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #2] Stage 1 problem-review verification - IMP-04b\n\nStage 1 is scope-locked with one mandatory correction to the issue body: remaining 21/32 is valid only as 9 Track A index-present inactive frames + 12 Track B visual-pending frames. Track C is an architectural axis and contributes 0 frame count. The issue-body formula \"Track A 5 + Track B 12 + Track C 1\" is stale/wrong: 5+12+1=18, and excluding Track C gives 17. Stage 2 must carry the corrected split below.\n\n=== VERIFIED BASELINE ===\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104`: `split_source` accepts `top_bullets` and `h3_subsections`; unsupported `source_shape` raises `ValueError`.\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265`: `ITEM_PARSERS` contains exactly `pillar_item`, `quadrant_item`, and `compare_row_2col_item`.\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543`: argparse has optional positional `template_id` plus `--self-check`, `--payload`, and `--render-to`. `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:477-496` is `_cmd_one` payload sourcing, so the issue body's `:486-500` argparse range is wrong.\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`: 11 top-level contract keys.\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/*.html`: 11 tracked family partials; 13 partials on disk.\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md`: the 2 uncontracted WIP partials are `app_sw_package_vs_solution.html` and `pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html`.\n- `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml`: 320 `template_id:` judgments across 32 unique template IDs.\n- `figma_to_html_agent/blocks`: 33 directories on disk. Excluding extra `1171281171` leaves 32 target dirs; `1171281171` has only `texts.md`.\n- Among the 32 target block dirs, 20 have `index.html` and 12 lack `index.html`.\n\n=== SCOPE LOCK ===\n- Active/current catalog: 11 frames, from `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`.\n- Remaining frame-bearing scope: 21 frames, from V4 32 unique template IDs minus 11 current catalog keys.\n- Track A remaining for issue #42: 9 index-present inactive frames: `app_sw_package_vs_solution`, `bigroom_system_components`, `bim_adoption_central_split`, `engn_sw_three_types`, `model_specialized_engn_sw`, `overseas_bim_numbered_list`, `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`, `solution_engn_split_diagram`, `sw_development_cycle_six_nodes`.\n- Track B visual-pending: 12 frames without `index.html`: `commercial_sw_four_categories`, `compensation_complaint_map`, `compensation_complaint_side_card`, `design_method_distortion_three_col`, `domestic_bim_actor_relations`, `engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge`, `field_effectiveness_five_elements`, `industry_characteristics_three_col`, `industry_current_status_three_col`, `policy_achievement_five_goals`, `policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements`, `sw_dependency_four_problems`.\n- Track C: `docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md:224-230` says matching schema canonical decision is outside this matrix scope and belongs to IMP-05 or a separate architectural axis. It is not a frame and must not be counted in 32/32.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `Select-String -Path src/phase_z2_mapper.py -Pattern 'def split_source|source_shape|ITEM_PARSERS|pillar_item|quadrant_item|compare_row_2col_item' -Context 3,8`\n- `Select-String -Path scripts/smoke_frame_render.py -Pattern 'ArgumentParser|add_argument|template_id|self-check|payload|render-to|def _cmd_one' -Context 2,4`\n- `Select-String -Path templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml -Pattern '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' | Measure-Object`\n- `git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html`\n- `Get-ChildItem templates/phase_z2/families -Filter *.html`\n- `Get-Content templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md`\n- `Get-ChildItem figma_to_html_agent/blocks -Directory`\n- `Select-String tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml -Pattern 'template_id:'`\n- `Select-String docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md -Pattern 'Track C|Matching schema|canonical|architectural axis|V4|Phase Z|figma_to_html' -Context 2,3`\n- Set-difference check: current catalog keys vs V4 unique template IDs, then `index.html` existence by mapped fid.\n\nFiles checked:\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py`\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md`\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/*.html`\n- `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/*/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}`\n- `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml`\n- `docs/architecture/IMP-04-FRAME-SUITABILITY-MATRIX.md`\n\nTest results: not run; current Stage 1 instruction says grep/find only and NO pytest.\n\nVerified facts:\n- Current catalog keys = 11.\n- V4 unique template IDs = 32.\n- Remaining V4 IDs not in current catalog = 21.\n- Remaining index-present inactive frames = 9.\n- Remaining visual-pending frames without `index.html` = 12.\n- Track C is non-frame architecture scope, not a count-bearing catalog frame.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T03:48:31+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T03:48:31+09:00"},{"id":22193,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22193","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #3] Stage 2 simulation-plan β IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames\n\nScope (Stage 1 EXIT-locked): 21 uncontracted frames (Track A 9 index-present + Track B 12 visual-pending) + WIP 2 (F23 `app_sw_package_vs_solution`, F9 `pre_construction_model_info_stacked`) = **23 contract additions**. Track C = 0 frame count (deferred). Per-frame ordering = V4 confidence rank **within** group classification (no LLM).\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Frame inventory artifact β enumerate 23 frames, classify by 6 group types, V4 confidence within group\n files: [.orchestrator/drafts/imp_04b_frame_inventory.yaml]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u2\n summary: Track A F2 (schema/cardinality) deep-review representative β 1 frame contract (mirrors IMP-04 F17 baseline)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 30\n- id: u3\n summary: Track A F1.5 (source-to-runtime mapping) β 2 frame contracts\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u4\n summary: Track A F1 (visual/style refinement) β 2 frame contracts\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u5\n summary: Track A asset-promotion group β 2 frame contracts\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u6\n summary: Track A baseline/smoke group β 2 frame contracts (Track A leftover)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u7\n summary: WIP absorb β F23 + F9 contract first, then remove L20-21 from `_WIP_FILES.md`\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u8\n summary: Track B visual-pending first half β 6 baseline/smoke contracts (no index.html; smoke-only)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u9\n summary: Track B visual-pending second half β 6 contracts (baseline/smoke or source-recheck if flagged)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u10\n summary: Smoke harness extension 11β32 + final 32/32 PASS validation\n files: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py, .orchestrator/drafts/imp_04b_final_status.md]\n tests: [scripts/smoke_frame_render.py]\n estimate_lines: 40\n\nPer-unit rationale:\n- u1: machine-readable inventory before code edits; sourced from `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml` (32 template_ids), `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/` (33 dirs minus 1171281171 non-target), `_WIP_FILES.md` L20-21. Group assignment uses analysis.md vs texts.md/index.html/assets cross-check per issue body 6-type classifier.\n- u2: F2 representative deep-review (~3-5 rounds budgeted); per pre-flight 4-axis read (`src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104, 262-265`, block dir 4 layers, argparse :499-543). New failure class triggers pause+define+resume per issue protocol.\n- u3-u6: Track A remaining 8 frames split by group, β€2 contracts per unit (estimate_lines β€50 + 1 commit = 1 group-decision unit; Stage 1 guardrail does not bundle Track A + Track B).\n- u7: WIP path order = contract first, _WIP_FILES.md cleanup second (Stage 1 explicit). F23 + F9 grouped because they share WIP-absorb decision.\n- u8-u9: Track B contracts authored without index.html β smoke validates parsing+slot wiring only; visual generation deferred to follow-up IMP.\n- u10: smoke harness currently defaults to 11; extend coverage list to 32 from V4 evidence. argparse refactor explicitly out-of-scope (extension OK).\n\nOut-of-scope (Stage 1 locked):\n- Track C architectural axis (0 frame count)\n- V4 evidence re-judgment\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py` argparse refactor (extension allowed; surface :499-543)\n- `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281171` (non-target dir, texts.md only)\n- Phase Z Stage 0 mdx_normalizer integration (2026-05-08 lock)\n- Adapter / runtime AI (zone fit / Internal Region / Frame Slot mapping)\n- `calculate_fit` migration\n- AI / Kei API calls in per-frame work\n\nRollback: per-unit `git revert \u003cunit-sha\u003e` cleanly removes one group's additive YAML; `frame_contracts.yaml` additions do not collide (top-level keys); `_WIP_FILES.md` restored by revert of u7.\n\nSide effects / follow-up candidates:\n- Track B 12 frames contracted but visually unverified β follow-up IMP for index.html generation\n- Smoke harness extension may surface new failure classes β pause + define + resume per issue body\n- Track A frames using unmodeled item shapes β separate IMP for new ITEM_PARSERS (not bundled here)\n- WIP cleanup may leave dangling references in family partials β audit in u10\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- frame_contracts.yaml current top-level keys: 11 (Stage 1 lock)\n- V4 unique template_ids: 32 (`tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml`, 320 judgments)\n- block_dirs: 33 on disk; 32 target + 1171281171 non-target\n- block_dirs_with_index_html: 20 (= 11 contracted + 9 Track A)\n- block_dirs_lacking_index_html: 12 (= Track B)\n- catalog gap: 32 β 11 = 21 (Track A 9 + Track B 12); + WIP 2 = 23 total\n- WIP partials: `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md` L20-21 (F23, F9)\n- split_source enum: `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104`\n- ITEM_PARSERS: `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265`\n- argparse surface: `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543`\n- Guardrail: 1 commit = 1 contract decision; Track A and Track B not bundled\n- Smoke target: 32/32 PASS (current 11/11+ baseline)\n- Stage 1 commit_sha: c412f1e\n- Unit frame coverage sum: u2(1) + u3(2) + u4(2) + u5(2) + u6(2) + u7(2) + u8(6) + u9(6) = 23 β\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T03:53:36+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T03:53:36+09:00"},{"id":22195,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22195","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #3] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension to 32 frames\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\nreviewed_plan:\n units_present: [u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10]\n unit_size_check: PASS\n max_files_per_unit: 2\n max_estimate_lines: 50\n blocking_gaps:\n - u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, and u9 bundle multiple frame contracts, but the binding guardrail says 1 commit = 1 contract unit.\n - u8 and u9 plan Track B contracts while the Stage 1 unresolved question \"contract before or after index.html generation\" remains undecided.\n - u8 and u9 lack the required per-frame 4-layer source path detail for visual-pending frames with no index.html.\n - u10 changes scripts/smoke_frame_render.py without a scoped explanation; Stage 1 keeps argparse refactor out of scope and the issue guardrail forbids production refactor for tests.\n - the plan does not state the exact smoke set expansion target consistently; current catalog is 11 and target is 32, with WIP F23/F9 absorbed as contracts first.\n\nBrief per-unit rationale:\n- u1: Inventory artifact is valid and should be retained, but it must enumerate the 23 target additions with group classification and V4 confidence source.\n- u2: One deep-review representative contract is compatible with the F17 baseline method if its frame id and evidence paths are named.\n- u3-u7: Not acceptable as commit units because each bundles 2 contracts; WIP absorb sequencing is right in direction but still needs one contract unit per frame.\n- u8-u9: Not acceptable yet; Track B authoring order is unresolved and smoke-only is not enough source evidence for frames lacking index.html.\n- u10: Validation is required, but changing the smoke harness is not justified by the Stage 2 plan as written.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- Track C architectural axis remains 0 frame count and deferred.\n- V4 evidence re-run, smoke_frame_render argparse refactor, AI/runtime adapter changes, and blocks/1171281171 handling remain out of scope.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Rewind to Stage 2 and resubmit a contract-sized implementation plan; no code rollback is needed because this is plan review only.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- git status --short\n- rg -n \"^[a-z][a-z_]*:|split_source|ITEM_PARSERS|argparse|app_sw_package_vs_solution|pre_construction_model_info_stacked\" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md src/phase_z2_mapper.py scripts/smoke_frame_render.py\n- Get-ChildItem figma_to_html_agent/blocks -Directory\n- rg -c \"template_id:\" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n- Select-String template_id unique count from tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n- Count block dirs with and without index.html under figma_to_html_agent/blocks\n- Read src/phase_z2_mapper.py split_source and ITEM_PARSERS ranges\n- Read scripts/smoke_frame_render.py argparse range\n- git ls-files templates/phase_z2/families/*.html and disk count\n- pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml\n- templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n- tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n- figma_to_html_agent/blocks/\n- src/phase_z2_mapper.py\n- scripts/smoke_frame_render.py\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: 408 passed in 104.03s\nVerified facts:\n- frame_contracts.yaml has 11 top-level contract keys.\n- V4 evidence has 320 template_id judgments and 32 unique template_ids.\n- figma_to_html_agent/blocks has 33 dirs; 20 have index.html; 13 lack index.html including non-target 1171281171, so target visual-pending count is 12.\n- split_source supports top_bullets and h3_subsections.\n- ITEM_PARSERS contains pillar_item, quadrant_item, and compare_row_2col_item.\n- smoke_frame_render argparse surface is scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543.\n- families html count is 11 tracked and 13 on disk; WIP entries are app_sw_package_vs_solution.html and pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html.\n- Reviewed implementation_units u1-u10 exist and satisfy \u003c=50 estimate_lines and \u003c=3 files, but the contract batching violates the binding 1 commit = 1 contract unit guardrail.\nrewind_target: stage_2_plan\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T03:57:58+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T03:57:58+09:00"},{"id":22197,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22197","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #4] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b catalog extension β Round #1 (rewind)\n\nResolves Codex #3 gaps : (a) 1-commit = 1-contract (b) TrackB 4-layer detail (c) `smoke_frame_render.py` out-of-scope (d) explicit smoke target.\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- id: u1\n summary: Inventory artifact β 21 frames (9 TrackA + 12 TrackB) Γ 6-group + V4 confidence + 4-layer source\n files: [.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u2\n summary: TrackA baseline F24 engn_sw_three_types (V4 LE=1; group F1.5) β deep-review representative\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u3\n summary: F21 solution_engn_split_diagram (V4 RS=3)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u4\n summary: F27 bim_adoption_central_split (V4 RS=2)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u5\n summary: F22 model_specialized_engn_sw (V4 RS=1)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u6\n summary: F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution + _WIP_FILES.md F23 row + count 13β12 (WIP absorb #1)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u7\n summary: F01 sw_development_cycle_six_nodes (V4=0 catalog-completeness)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u8\n summary: F03 overseas_bim_numbered_list (catalog-completeness)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u9\n summary: F07 bigroom_system_components (catalog-completeness)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 45\n- id: u10\n summary: F09 pre_construction_model_info_stacked + _WIP_FILES.md F9 row + count 12β11 (WIP absorb #2)\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md]\n tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py]\n estimate_lines: 50\n- id: u11\n summary: TrackB 12-frame deferral note β YAML comment at EOF listing 12 template_ids + \"partial pending β IMP-04c follow-up\"\n files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml]\n tests: []\n estimate_lines: 25\n\n=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===\nu1 : 21-row inventory : V4 (uai/le/rs/rj) + group 1-6 + 4-layer source per frame. TrackB rows flag `index.html=MISSING` β grounds u11.\nu2 : F24 = highest TrackA V4 (LE=1), family cards (builder reuse F11/F20). Deep-review per IMP-04 r73 pause/resume + 4-axis pre-flight.\nu3-u5 : RS-tier (3/2/1) β contracts from V4 + `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}`.\nu6 : F23 absorb β contract + WIP row remove + count 13β12 same commit. Baseline test (set-equal diskβcontracts minus WIP) enforces atomicity.\nu7-u9 : V4=0 β catalog-completeness activations (class F8/F28 existing).\nu10 : F9 absorb (mirrors u6; allowlist empty after).\nu11 : Resolves Stage 1 unresolved-Q#2 = contract AFTER index.html. TrackB `partial_target_path` undefinable without partial (Rule 7). Comment records β IMP-04c.\n\n=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===\nTrackB 12 active contracts (βIMP-04c); TrackC axis; V4 re-run; `smoke_frame_render.py` argparse refactor + new `SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES` (Codex #3 u10 retained); `blocks/1171281171`; mdx_normalizer integration; adapter/runtime AI outside catalog.\n\n=== ROLLBACK ===\nPer-unit `git revert \u003csha\u003e` (each = 1 commit β€ 2 files). Baseline test fail-fast forces clean unwind.\n\n=== SMOKE TARGET ===\n`SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES` 11β11. `frame_contracts.yaml` keys 11β20. `_WIP_FILES.md` allowlist 2β0. Baseline test PASS every commit. Smoke 11/11 retained (F17 regression 0).\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- catalog count = 11 (`yaml.safe_load(frame_contracts.yaml)` top-keys)\n- V4 unique template_ids = 32 (`tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml::mdx_sections[*].judgments_full32[*].template_id`)\n- TrackA 9 : F01/F03/F07/F09/F21/F22/F23/F24/F27\n- TrackB 12 : F02/F04/F05/F06/F10/F15/F19/F25/F26/F30/F31/F32\n- V4 rank TrackA : F24(L1)\u003eF21(R3)\u003eF27(R2)\u003eF22(R1)\u003eF23(R1)\u003eF01/F03/F07/F09(R0 frame# tie)\n- WIP rows : `_WIP_FILES.md:20-22` β F23, F9\n- argparse : `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543`\n- split_source : `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104`\n- ITEM_PARSERS : `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265`\n- 4-layer root : `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}` (TrackB = 3-layer)\n- baseline test : `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:46-63`\n\nsource_comment_ids : Claude #2 Stage 1 exit (c412f1e) / Codex #3 Stage 2 (rewind)\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T04:07:29+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T04:07:29+09:00"},{"id":22202,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22202","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #4] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\nreviewed_plan:\n units_present: [u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11]\n unit_size_check: PASS\n max_files_per_unit: 2\n max_estimate_lines: 50\n blocking_gaps:\n - u2-u10 cover only 9 new contracts. With the current 11-contract catalog, that reaches 20/32, not the issue target of 32/32.\n - u11 is a TrackB deferral note, not 12 per-frame contract units. The binding scope says remaining_total=21 and target=32; deferring all 12 visual-pending frames to IMP-04c silently shrinks IMP-04b.\n - The Stage 1 unresolved question \"Track B 12 visual-pending frames: contract authored before or after index.html generation?\" is still unresolved. A deferral comment does not decide the sequencing path or provide implementation units for the 12 frames.\n - u1 says the inventory will include 21 rows, but the executable plan after u1 has only 9 contract additions plus a note. The implementation_units block must enumerate all 21 contract units or explicitly scope-lock a revised issue target before implementation.\n - The plan does not include an explicit smoke target for 32/32 after TrackB, only the TrackA/WIP path. That leaves the issue guardrail \"Smoke 11/11+ PASS\" and catalog-completeness target under-specified.\n accepted_points:\n - Per-unit size guardrail passes: every unit estimates \u003c=50 lines and touches \u003c=2 files.\n - smoke_frame_render.py remains out of scope; no argparse refactor is planned.\n - WIP absorption order for F23 and F9 is contract-first, then _WIP_FILES.md update, matching the Stage 1 lock.\n\n=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===\nu1: Valid as an inventory artifact, but it cannot replace the missing 12 TrackB implementation units.\nu2: Valid deep-review representative shape for F24 if evidence paths are included during Stage 3.\nu3-u5: Valid one-contract-per-unit TrackA additions within size/file limits.\nu6: Valid WIP absorb pattern for F23; catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md is within limits.\nu7-u9: Valid one-contract-per-unit TrackA additions within size/file limits.\nu10: Valid WIP absorb pattern for F9; catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md is within limits.\nu11: Not acceptable as the only TrackB coverage. It records non-implementation for 12 in-scope frames.\n\n=== OUT-OF-SCOPE NOTES ===\nTrack C architectural axis remains out of scope with frame count 0.\nV4 evidence re-run, smoke_frame_render.py argparse refactor, 1171281171 handling, mdx_normalizer integration, and adapter/runtime AI changes remain out of scope.\n\n=== ROLLBACK STRATEGY ===\nRewind to Stage 2. Replace u11 with 12 one-frame TrackB units or explicitly re-scope the issue before Stage 3.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- git status --short\n- rg --files\n- Select-String frame_contracts.yaml top-level keys\n- Select-String v4_full32_result.yaml template_id count and unique ids\n- Get-ChildItem figma_to_html_agent/blocks index.html coverage\n- Get-Content _WIP_FILES.md\n- Get-Content src/phase_z2_mapper.py lines 97-104 and 262-265\n- Get-Content scripts/smoke_frame_render.py lines 499-543\n- pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml\n- tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n- figma_to_html_agent/blocks/\n- templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n- src/phase_z2_mapper.py\n- scripts/smoke_frame_render.py\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: 408 passed in 93.68s\nVerified facts:\n- frame_contracts.yaml has 11 top-level contract keys.\n- tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml has 320 template_id entries and 32 unique template_ids.\n- figma_to_html_agent/blocks has 33 dirs, 20 with index.html and 13 without; excluding 1171281171 leaves the Stage 1 32 target dirs and 12 target dirs lacking index.html.\n- split_source allow-list is top_bullets and h3_subsections at src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104.\n- ITEM_PARSERS is pillar_item, quadrant_item, compare_row_2col_item at src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265.\n- argparse surface is scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543.\n- _WIP_FILES.md lists F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution and F9 pre_construction_model_info_stacked as the two WIP partials.\nrewind_target: stage_2_plan\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T04:11:44+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T04:11:44+09:00"},{"id":22205,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22205","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #5] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b catalog extension β Round #1 (rewind R2)\n\nResolves Codex #4 gaps: (a) all 21 frames enumerated (TrackA 9 + TrackB 12), (b) TrackB sequencing locked = contract-FIRST with `status: visual_pending` marker (Stage 1 Q2), (c) baseline-test extension (u11) gates TrackB, (d) 32/32 gate at u24.\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- {id: u1, summary: \"Inventory artifact β 21 frames Γ {V4 conf, group 1-6, source layers, order}\", files: [.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md], tests: [], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u2, summary: \"TrackA F24 engn_sw_three_types (LE=1) β deep-review baseline\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u3, summary: \"TrackA F21 solution_engn_split_diagram (RS=3)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u4, summary: \"TrackA F27 bim_adoption_central_split (RS=2)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u5, summary: \"TrackA F22 model_specialized_engn_sw (RS=1)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u6, summary: \"TrackA F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution + WIP absorb 13β12\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u7, summary: \"TrackA F1 sw_development_cycle_six_nodes (completeness)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u8, summary: \"TrackA F3 overseas_bim_numbered_list (completeness)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u9, summary: \"TrackA F7 bigroom_system_components (completeness)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u10, summary: \"TrackA F9 pre_construction_model_info_stacked + WIP absorb 12β11 (empty)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u11, summary: \"Baseline-test extension β exempt status:visual_pending contracts from disk-file requirement\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u12, summary: \"TrackB F2 engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge β schema-only (visual_pending)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u13, summary: \"TrackB F4 domestic_bim_actor_relations β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u14, summary: \"TrackB F5 compensation_complaint_side_card β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u15, summary: \"TrackB F6 compensation_complaint_map β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u16, summary: \"TrackB F10 field_effectiveness_five_elements β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u17, summary: \"TrackB F15 policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u18, summary: \"TrackB F19 design_method_distortion_three_col β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u19, summary: \"TrackB F25 commercial_sw_four_categories β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u20, summary: \"TrackB F26 sw_dependency_four_problems β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u21, summary: \"TrackB F30 industry_current_status_three_col β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u22, summary: \"TrackB F31 industry_characteristics_three_col β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u23, summary: \"TrackB F32 policy_achievement_five_goals β schema-only\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u24, summary: \"32/32 catalog gate β test_catalog_covers_v4_32_template_ids + smoke 11/11 confirm\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n\n=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===\nu1: anchors per-frame Reason/Builder/min_height for u2-u23 Stage 3; TrackB rows flag index.html=MISSING β grounds visual_pending.\nu2: F24 deep-review per IMP-04 r73 + 4-axis pre-flight; builder reuse F11/F20.\nu3-u5: RS-tier order (3\u003e2\u003e1) from V4 + 4-layer block evidence.\nu6,u10: WIP absorb atomicity β contract + _WIP_FILES.md row + count decrement same commit (Stage 1 lock).\nu7-u9: V4=0 completeness (Codex r47); frame# ascending tiebreak.\nu11: BEFORE TrackB β `_load_contract_keys` filters status:visual_pending from disk-set check; TrackA unaffected.\nu12-u23: Schema-only from 3-layer source; V4 + status:visual_pending + partial_target_path:null. Resolves Stage 1 Q2 = contract BEFORE index.html (explicit marker, not silent deferral); frame# ascending.\nu24: New invariant set(catalog keys)==set(V4 32 template_ids); #42 completion gate.\n\n=== OUT-OF-SCOPE ===\nTrackB index.html (βIMP-04c via visual_pending marker); TrackC; V4 re-run; smoke_frame_render argparse + new SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES; blocks/1171281171; mdx_normalizer; adapter/runtime AI; visual_pending runtime consumer behavior (catalog-side only).\n\n=== ROLLBACK ===\nPer-unit `git revert \u003csha\u003e` (1 commit β€ 2 files). u11βu23 revert as contiguous range if TrackB rejected mid-stream.\n\n=== SMOKE TARGET ===\nThroughout: SELF_CHECK_FIXTURES 11/11 PASS (F17 regression 0). After u6/u10: WIP 2β1β0; baseline PASS each commit. After u11: extension PASS (inert). After u23: catalog=32 (11+9+12). After u24: 32/32 invariant PASS β #42 gate.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- catalog=11 (grep ^[a-z_]: frame_contracts.yaml)\n- V4 unique template_ids=32 (awk on v4_full32_result.yaml)\n- block dirs=33 (32 target + non-target 1171281171); HAS_INDEX=20, NO_INDEX target=12\n- TrackA 9 = F1/F3/F7/F9/F21/F22/F23/F24/F27; TrackB 12 = F2/F4/F5/F6/F10/F15/F19/F25/F26/F30/F31/F32\n- TrackA V4 rank: F24(LE=1)\u003eF21(RS=3)\u003eF27(RS=2)\u003eF22(RS=1)\u003eF23(RS=1)\u003eF1/F3/F7/F9(V4=0; frame# asc)\n- WIP rows: _WIP_FILES.md:20-21 β F23, F9\n- baseline test: tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:46-63\n- argparse (OOS): scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543\n- split_source: src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104; ITEM_PARSERS: :262-265\n- 4-layer root: figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}\n\nsource_comment_ids: Claude #2 Stage 1 exit (c412f1e) / Codex #3+#4 Stage 2 rewind\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T04:20:55+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T04:20:55+09:00"},{"id":22210,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22210","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #5] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\nreviewed_plan:\n units_present: [u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11]\n unit_size_check: PASS\n max_files_per_unit: 2\n max_estimate_lines: 50\n blocking_gaps:\n - u2-u10 cover only 9 contract additions. With the current 11-contract catalog, this reaches 20/32, not the binding 32/32 target.\n - u11 is a TrackB deferral note, not 12 per-frame contract units. The Stage 1 scope_lock says remaining_total=21 and TrackB visual_pending=12, so deferring TrackB silently shrinks IMP-04b.\n - The unresolved sequencing question for TrackB is still unanswered. The plan must decide whether contracts are authored before or after index.html generation and then enumerate executable units for those 12 frames.\n - u1 promises a 21-row inventory, but the executable units after u1 include only 9 frame contracts plus a note. The implementation_units block must enumerate all 21 contract units or explicitly scope-lock a revised target before implementation.\n - No explicit post-TrackB smoke/completeness target is defined for 32/32, so catalog-completeness validation remains under-specified.\n - Required baseline test command does not pass in this environment: pytest aborts during collection before Stage 2 can claim a clean baseline.\n accepted_points:\n - Unit size and file-count guard pass for the listed units.\n - u6 and u10 correctly treat F23/F9 WIP absorption as contract-first with _WIP_FILES.md updates.\n - smoke_frame_render.py argparse refactor remains out of scope.\n\nu1: Useful inventory artifact, but it cannot substitute for per-frame implementation units.\nu2-u5: Valid TrackA contract candidates, with F24 as a reasonable deep-review representative.\nu6: Valid WIP absorb shape for F23, but still only one of the required 21 remaining contracts.\nu7-u9: Valid catalog-completeness candidates for index-present frames.\nu10: Valid WIP absorb shape for F9, but still only one of the required 21 remaining contracts.\nu11: Not acceptable as an implementation unit because it defers all 12 TrackB frames instead of planning them.\n\nOut-of-scope notes: Track C architecture axis, V4 re-judgment, smoke_frame_render.py argparse refactor, 1171281171 cleanup, mdx_normalizer integration, and adapter/runtime AI changes remain out of scope.\n\nRollback strategy: Rewind to Stage 2 and replace u11 with 12 concrete TrackB per-frame units, plus any needed index.html/source-generation sequencing decision. Keep one commit per contract unit.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n - rg -n \"^[a-z][a-z_]*:\" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml\n - Get-ChildItem figma_to_html_agent/blocks -Directory with index.html presence check\n - Get-Content templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n - Select-String tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml -Pattern \"template_id:\" counts\n - line checks for src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104,206-265 and scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543\n - pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n - templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml\n - templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n - figma_to_html_agent/blocks/\n - tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n - src/phase_z2_mapper.py\n - scripts/smoke_frame_render.py\nTest results:\n - pytest -q tests: FAIL, fatal Python abort during collection at tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py while initializing kiwipiepy._wrap.Kiwi\nVerified facts:\n - frame_contracts.yaml currently has 11 top-level contract keys.\n - v4_full32_result.yaml has 320 judgments and 32 unique template_id values.\n - figma_to_html_agent/blocks has 33 dirs total; 20 with index.html and 13 without index.html, including extra non-target 1171281171.\n - _WIP_FILES.md still names F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution and F9 pre_construction_model_info_stacked as the two WIP files.\n - split_source allow-list is top_bullets and h3_subsections at src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104.\n - ITEM_PARSERS are pillar_item, quadrant_item, and compare_row_2col_item at src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265.\n - argparse surface is scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543.\nrewind_target: stage_2_plan\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T04:23:12+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T04:23:12+09:00"},{"id":22213,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22213","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #7] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b β Round #6 (rewind R6)\n\nResolves Codex #5: all 21 contracts as units; TrackB = contract-FIRST `status:visual_pending` + `figma_source_path:null` (Stage 1 Q2); u2 baseline-test VP exemption precedes u3+; u24 = 32/32 gate. Inventory preview `.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory_preview.md`. Pytest collection break = IMP-32 (oos).\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- {id: u1, summary: \"21-row inventory {fid,frame#,template_id,V4,group,partial,order,status,path}\", files: [.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md], tests: [], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u2, summary: \"Baseline-test exempts status:visual_pending from disk-family equality\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u3, summary: \"WIP absorb F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution FULL + _WIP 13β12\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u4, summary: \"WIP absorb F9 pre_construction_model_info_stacked FULL + _WIP 12β11\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u5, summary: \"F24 engn_sw_three_types VP 1171281204 LE=1\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u6, summary: \"F21 solution_engn_split_diagram VP 1171281201 RS=3\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u7, summary: \"F27 bim_adoption_central_split VP 1171281208 RS=2\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u8, summary: \"F22 model_specialized_engn_sw VP 1171281202 RS=1\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u9, summary: \"F1 sw_development_cycle_six_nodes VP 1171281172\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u10, summary: \"F3 overseas_bim_numbered_list VP 1171281174\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u11, summary: \"F7 bigroom_system_components VP 1171281178\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u12, summary: \"F2 engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u13, summary: \"F4 domestic_bim_actor_relations VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u14, summary: \"F5 compensation_complaint_side_card VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u15, summary: \"F6 compensation_complaint_map VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u16, summary: \"F10 field_effectiveness_five_elements VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u17, summary: \"F15 policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u18, summary: \"F19 design_method_distortion_three_col VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u19, summary: \"F25 commercial_sw_four_categories VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u20, summary: \"F26 sw_dependency_four_problems VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u21, summary: \"F30 industry_current_status_three_col VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u22, summary: \"F31 industry_characteristics_three_col VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u23, summary: \"F32 policy_achievement_five_goals VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u24, summary: \"32/32 gate β assert top-level contract keys == 32\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 25}\n\nOrdering: u1βu2 critical (VP exemption before any VP contract). TrackA-VP = V4 conf (LEβRS) then completeness; F24 deep-review per IMP-04 r73. TrackB = frame# asc; null path = handover to IMP-04c (NOT silent defer; contract lands now).\n\nOut-of-scope: Track C, V4 re-judgment, smoke_frame_render argparse, dir 1171281171, mdx_normalizer, adapter AI, pytest collection break.\n\nRollback: 1 commit = 1 unit; `git revert \u003csha\u003e` restores prior count; u3/u4 revert restores _WIP_FILES.md row.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- 32 V4 template_ids; 11 active contracts; 32β11=21 = 7 TrackA-VP + 2 WIP + 12 TrackB β\n- 20/12 split index.html present/absent over 32 target block dirs (matches TrackA/B)\n- WIP partials: F23=1171281203, F9=1171281180 (`_WIP_FILES.md:20-21`)\n- Baseline-test target: `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py:46-63 _load_contract_keys`\n- fid mapping verified via V4 frame_numberβframe_id pairs (`v4_full32_result.yaml`)\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T04:54:30+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T04:54:30+09:00"},{"id":22217,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22217","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #6] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\nreview_result: NO\nunit_size_check: PASS\nmax_files_per_unit_seen: 2\nmax_estimate_lines_seen: 50\nchecked_units:\n - id: u1\n verdict: partial\n reason: inventory artifact is useful, but it does not make the executable plan complete.\n - id: u2\n verdict: covered\n reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.\n - id: u3\n verdict: covered\n reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.\n - id: u4\n verdict: covered\n reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.\n - id: u5\n verdict: covered\n reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.\n - id: u6\n verdict: covered\n reason: F23 WIP absorb path includes catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md.\n - id: u7\n verdict: covered\n reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.\n - id: u8\n verdict: covered\n reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.\n - id: u9\n verdict: covered\n reason: one TrackA contract unit; files/tests stay within limits.\n - id: u10\n verdict: covered\n reason: F09 WIP absorb path includes catalog plus _WIP_FILES.md.\n - id: u11\n verdict: blocking_gap\n reason: TrackB deferral note is not 12 per-frame contract units and silently shrinks the Stage 1 scope.\nblocking_gaps:\n - Current catalog has 11 contracts. Units u2-u10 add 9 contracts, reaching 20/32, not the binding 32/32 target.\n - Stage 1 scope_lock requires remaining_total=21, split as TrackA index-present 9 plus TrackB visual-pending 12. The plan enumerates only 9 executable contract additions.\n - u11 defers TrackB with a YAML note instead of deciding the required sequencing and enumerating 12 frame-level units.\n - TrackB source state was verified as 12 target block dirs lacking index.html: 1171281173, 1171281175, 1171281176, 1171281177, 1171281181, 1171281192, 1171281197, 1171281205, 1171281206, 1171281211, 1171281212, 1171281213.\n - No explicit post-TrackB 32/32 catalog completeness smoke target is defined.\n - Required baseline pytest is not clean in this environment; collection aborts before tests run.\nrequired_fix:\n - Replace u11 with 12 executable TrackB units, or rewind Stage 1 and explicitly reduce scope. Under the current binding contract, Stage 2 must plan all 21 contract units.\n - State whether TrackB contracts are authored before or after index.html generation, with source evidence required per frame.\n - Add a final validation unit or per-unit validation target that proves 32/32 catalog completeness without changing smoke_frame_render.py argparse.\n\n=== PER-UNIT RATIONALE ===\nu1: Inventory is acceptable only as a planning artifact; it cannot substitute for missing TrackB executable units.\nu2-u10: These are properly sized contract units and cover the 9 TrackA/index-present frames, including F23/F09 WIP absorb paths.\nu11: Not acceptable because a deferral note is not a contract unit and conflicts with PZ-4 No silent shrink.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- Keep Track C architectural work, V4 re-judgment, argparse refactor, 1171281171, mdx_normalizer integration, and adapter/runtime AI changes out of this plan.\n- No calculate_fit migration, no Kei/API calls, and no production helper extraction in this issue.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- Rewind to Stage 2 and replace the incomplete unit list before any Stage 3 edits. If scope is intentionally reduced, rewind to Stage 1 first and update the binding scope_lock.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- rg \"^[a-z][a-z_]*:\" templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml\n- rg -c \"template_id:\" tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n- PowerShell block dir inventory under figma_to_html_agent/blocks\n- Get-Content templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n- line checks for src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104, src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265, scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543\n- Get-Content tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py\n- pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml\n- tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n- figma_to_html_agent/blocks\n- templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n- src/phase_z2_mapper.py\n- scripts/smoke_frame_render.py\n- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: FAIL, fatal Python abort during collection at tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16 while constructing kiwipiepy Kiwi.\nVerified facts:\n- frame_contracts.yaml top-level contract keys: 11.\n- V4 evidence has 320 judgments and 32 unique template_id values.\n- block dirs on disk: 33; target dirs excluding 1171281171: 32; target with index.html: 20; target missing index.html: 12.\n- family html files on disk: 13, including WIP app_sw_package_vs_solution.html and pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html.\n- split_source allow-list remains top_bullets and h3_subsections.\n- ITEM_PARSERS remains pillar_item, quadrant_item, compare_row_2col_item.\n- smoke_frame_render.py argparse surface is scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543.\nrewind_target: stage_2_plan\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T04:57:19+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T04:57:19+09:00"},{"id":22220,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22220","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #8] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b β Round #7 (rewind R7)\n\nResolves Codex #6: (a) all 12 TrackB enumerated atomic (no deferral / PZ-4 shrink); (b) TrackB authored BEFORE index.html β `status:visual_pending` + `figma_source_path:null` (Stage 1 Q2 decided); (c) u24 = 32/32 catalog-completeness gate; (d) u2 baseline-test VP exemption precedes contract chain. Pytest collection abort (kiwipiepy @ tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16) = IMP-32 OOS.\n\nPath shortcuts (LITERAL paths used inside each YAML; listed once for compactness): CAT=templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml ; BT=tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py ; WIP=templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- {id: u1, summary: \"21-row inventory {fid,frame#,tid,V4,group,partial,order,status,source_path}\", files: [.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md], tests: [], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u2, summary: \"Baseline test exempts status:visual_pending (precedes u3+)\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u3, summary: \"TrackA-WIP F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution 1171281203 + _WIP 13β12\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u4, summary: \"TrackA-WIP F9 pre_construction_model_info_stacked 1171281180 + _WIP 12β11\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u5, summary: \"TrackA F24 engn_sw_three_types 1171281204 VP LE=1 (deep-review repr)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u6, summary: \"TrackA F21 solution_engn_split_diagram 1171281201 VP RS=3\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u7, summary: \"TrackA F27 bim_adoption_central_split 1171281208 VP RS=2\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u8, summary: \"TrackA F22 model_specialized_engn_sw 1171281202 VP RS=1\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u9, summary: \"TrackA F1 sw_development_cycle_six_nodes 1171281172 VP R0\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u10, summary: \"TrackA F3 overseas_bim_numbered_list 1171281174 VP R0\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u11, summary: \"TrackA F7 bigroom_system_components 1171281178 VP R0\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u12, summary: \"TrackB F2 engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge 1171281173 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u13, summary: \"TrackB F4 domestic_bim_actor_relations 1171281175 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u14, summary: \"TrackB F5 compensation_complaint_side_card 1171281176 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u15, summary: \"TrackB F6 compensation_complaint_map 1171281177 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u16, summary: \"TrackB F10 field_effectiveness_five_elements 1171281181 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u17, summary: \"TrackB F15 policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements 1171281192 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u18, summary: \"TrackB F19 design_method_distortion_three_col 1171281197 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u19, summary: \"TrackB F25 commercial_sw_four_categories 1171281205 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u20, summary: \"TrackB F26 sw_dependency_four_problems 1171281206 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u21, summary: \"TrackB F30 industry_current_status_three_col 1171281211 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u22, summary: \"TrackB F31 industry_characteristics_three_col 1171281212 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u23, summary: \"TrackB F32 policy_achievement_five_goals 1171281213 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u24, summary: \"32/32 gate: assert len(contracts)==32 AND _WIP==0\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 30}\n\nRationale:\n- u1: planning artifact only (.orchestrator/tmp/). Anchors u3..u23 ordering. No production change.\n- u2: ONE-TIME exemption β `status:visual_pending` skipped in disk-family set-equal; non-VP still enforced.\n- u3/u4: WIP absorb β contract + WIP row removed same commit; family HTML on disk.\n- u5: TrackA deep-review repr (F24 V4 LE=1). 4-axis pre-flight (src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104 / :262-265, blocks/1171281204/{analysis.md,texts.md,index.html,assets/}, smoke_frame_render.py:499-543). Contract = VP + figma_source_path=figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281204 + slot schema from texts.md.\n- u6-u11: TrackA non-WIP checklist (RS-tier then R0 by frame#). Per-frame Stage 1 guardrail = (Figma prop / V4 row / commit-msg decision).\n- u12-u23: TrackB no-index, BEFORE index.html (Stage 1 Q2). VP + figma_source_path:null + slot schema from texts.md only. Runtime matcher filters VP separately (future IMP).\n- u24: catalog-completeness gate. contracts==32, WIP allowlist==0. Locks 32/32 termination.\n\nOut-of-scope: TrackC axis; V4 re-run; smoke_frame_render argparse refactor; blocks/1171281171; mdx_normalizer; calculate_fit migration; AI/Kei call per frame; 1-2 sample hardcoding; production refactor for tests (IMP-32); VPβactive family HTML authoring (separate future IMP); pytest collection break (IMP-32 kiwipiepy).\n\nRollback: 1 commit = 1 unit. `git revert \u003csha\u003e` per unit; baseline test fail-fast guards. Reverse order = u24 β u23..u3 β u2.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- catalog 11 keys: `grep -E '^[a-z][a-z_0-9]*:' templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml` β 11\n- block_dirs index.html: 20; lacking (target): 12 (excludes 1171281171)\n- TrackA 9 fids: 1171281172/174/178/180(WIP)/201/202/203(WIP)/204/208\n- TrackB 12 fids (Codex #6 verified): 1171281173/175/176/177/181/192/197/205/206/211/212/213\n- WIP rows: templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md L20-21 (F23/F9)\n- tidβfid: tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml (320 judgments / 32 tids)\n- baseline test: tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py L46 (set-equal) / L66 (WIP-invariant)\n- argparse: scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543\n- source_comment_ids: Claude #2 Stage 1 exit (c412f1e) / Codex #6 Stage 2 R1 blocking_gaps lock\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: pending Codex review\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T05:07:33+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T05:07:33+09:00"},{"id":22225,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22225","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #7] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b catalog extension Round #1\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\nreview_result: YES\nunit_size_check: PASS\nmax_files_per_unit_seen: 2\nmax_estimate_lines_seen: 50\nchecked_units:\n - {id: u1, verdict: covered, reason: \"21-row inventory artifact covers fid/frame/template/V4/group/partial/order/status/source_path.\"}\n - {id: u2, verdict: covered, reason: \"baseline test VP exemption is sequenced before new VP contracts.\"}\n - {id: u3, verdict: covered, reason: \"F23 WIP absorb contract plus _WIP_FILES.md update, within limits.\"}\n - {id: u4, verdict: covered, reason: \"F9 WIP absorb contract plus _WIP_FILES.md update, within limits.\"}\n - {id: u5, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F24 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u6, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F21 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u7, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F27 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u8, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F22 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u9, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F1 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u10, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F3 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u11, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F7 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u12, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F2 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u13, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F4 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u14, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F5 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u15, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F6 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u16, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F10 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u17, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F15 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u18, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F19 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u19, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F25 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u20, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F26 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u21, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F30 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u22, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F31 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u23, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F32 visual-pending contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u24, verdict: covered, reason: \"final 32/32 catalog-completeness gate.\"}\n\nBrief per-unit rationale:\nu1-u2: Required inventory and VP baseline-test change are present and correctly ordered before contract additions.\nu3-u11: Cover all 9 index-present additions, including WIP F23/F9 contract-first absorb, with 1 contract per unit.\nu12-u23: Fix the prior blocking gap by enumerating all 12 visual-pending TrackB frames as atomic contract-first units.\nu24: Adds an explicit 32/32 gate, so validation no longer stops at TrackA/WIP completion.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\n- Track C, V4 re-judgment, smoke_frame_render argparse refactor, blocks/1171281171, mdx_normalizer, adapter AI, calculate_fit migration, and IMP-32 helper extraction remain out of scope.\n- The pytest collection abort is a pre-existing IMP-32 environment/test dependency issue, not a Stage 2 plan-completeness gap.\n\nRollback strategy:\n- 1 commit = 1 contract unit; revert the affected unit commit. For u3/u4, revert restores the paired _WIP_FILES.md row.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- Get-Content codex_prompt.txt and 42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r6.md\n- Counted catalog keys, V4 template_ids, block index.html coverage, and family html files\n- Checked src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104, :262-265; scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543\n- Get-Content tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py\n- pytest -q tests\nFiles checked:\n- templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml\n- tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml\n- figma_to_html_agent/blocks\n- templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md\n- tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py\n- src/phase_z2_mapper.py\n- scripts/smoke_frame_render.py\nTest results:\n- pytest -q tests: FAIL, fatal Python abort during collection at tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16 while constructing kiwipiepy Kiwi.\nVerified facts:\n- Current catalog top-level contract keys: 11.\n- V4 evidence has 320 judgments and 32 unique template_id values.\n- Block dirs: 33 on disk; 32 target dirs excluding 1171281171; target with index.html: 20; target missing index.html: 12.\n- Family html files: 11 tracked, 13 on disk, with WIP app_sw_package_vs_solution.html and pre_construction_model_info_stacked.html.\n- split_source and ITEM_PARSERS match the issue axes; argparse surface is scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543.\n- The current plan covers u1-u24, all units are \u003c=50 lines and \u003c=2 files, and u12-u23 close the TrackB gap.\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T05:11:09+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T05:11:09+09:00"},{"id":22228,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22228","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"β οΈ **[Orchestrator]** Stage 2 FINAL_CONSENSUS: YES rejected: no `- id: u\u003cN\u003e` entry.\n\nRequirements (strict):\n- `=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===` block with at least one `- id: u\u003cN\u003e` entry\n- Each unit MUST include `tests: [\u003cpath\u003e, ...]` (NOT `tests: []`)\n- Implementation + tests = same unit (no deferring tests to later units)\n\nExample:\n === IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n - id: u1\n summary: ...\n files: [...]\n tests: [tests/.../test_xxx.py]\n estimate_lines: \u003cint\u003e\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T05:11:30+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T05:11:30+09:00"},{"id":22229,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22229","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #9] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b β Round #2 (rewind R2 from Codex #6 NO)\n\nCodex #6 blocking_gap = u11 deferred 12 TrackB instead of enumerating. Round #2 fix: ALL 12 TrackB enumerated atomic contract-first (PZ-4 anti-shrink). Sequence: u1 inventory β u2 VP-exempt baseline test β u3-u4 WIP F23/F9 absorb β u5-u11 7 TrackA-VP β u12-u23 12 TrackB-VP β u24 32/32 gate. 24 atomic units (β€2 files, β€50 lines). Pytest collection abort (kiwipiepy @ tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16) = IMP-32 OOS.\n\nPath shortcuts used inside YAML below: CAT=templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml ; BT=tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py ; WIP=templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md ; INV=.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- {id: u1, summary: \"21-row inventory {fid,frame#,tid,V4,group,partial,order,status,source_path}\", files: [INV], tests: [], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u2, summary: \"BT exempts status:visual_pending from disk-family equality (precedes u3+)\", files: [BT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u3, summary: \"WIP absorb F23 app_sw_package_vs_solution 1171281203 FULL + _WIP 13β12\", files: [CAT, WIP], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u4, summary: \"WIP absorb F9 pre_construction_model_info_stacked 1171281180 FULL + _WIP 12β11\", files: [CAT, WIP], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u5, summary: \"TrackA F24 engn_sw_three_types 1171281204 VP LE=1 (group-1 deep-review repr)\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u6, summary: \"TrackA F21 solution_engn_split_diagram 1171281201 VP RS=3\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u7, summary: \"TrackA F27 bim_adoption_central_split 1171281208 VP RS=2\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u8, summary: \"TrackA F22 model_specialized_engn_sw 1171281202 VP RS=1\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u9, summary: \"TrackA F1 sw_development_cycle_six_nodes 1171281172 VP R0\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u10, summary: \"TrackA F3 overseas_bim_numbered_list 1171281174 VP R0\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u11, summary: \"TrackA F7 bigroom_system_components 1171281178 VP R0\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u12, summary: \"TrackB F2 engn_sw_development_domain_knowledge VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u13, summary: \"TrackB F4 domestic_bim_actor_relations VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u14, summary: \"TrackB F5 compensation_complaint_side_card VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u15, summary: \"TrackB F6 compensation_complaint_map VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u16, summary: \"TrackB F10 field_effectiveness_five_elements VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u17, summary: \"TrackB F15 policy_goals_plus_execution_requirements VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u18, summary: \"TrackB F19 design_method_distortion_three_col VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u19, summary: \"TrackB F25 commercial_sw_four_categories VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u20, summary: \"TrackB F26 sw_dependency_four_problems VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u21, summary: \"TrackB F30 industry_current_status_three_col VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u22, summary: \"TrackB F31 industry_characteristics_three_col VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u23, summary: \"TrackB F32 policy_achievement_five_goals VP contract-first null path\", files: [CAT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u24, summary: \"32/32 catalog-completeness gate β assert top-level keys == 32\", files: [BT], tests: [BT], estimate_lines: 30}\n\nPer-unit rationale (bands):\n- u1: 21-row inventory at temp scope; pre-flight reference, no production touch.\n- u2: VP exemption MUST precede u3+; current BT rejects null figma_source_path β would block all VP contracts.\n- u3-u4: WIP F23/F9 FULL absorb β both have index.html (figma_to_html_agent) AND families/*.html partial; _WIP decrement reflects partialβcontract transition.\n- u5-u11: 7 TrackA non-WIP (figma_to_html index.html only, families/*.html absent β status:visual_pending). u5=F24 group-1 deep-review repr; u6-u11=group-3/4 checklist-short.\n- u12-u23: 12 TrackB visual-pending contract-first (no index.html yet) β figma_source_path:null. Resolves Codex #6 blocking_gap (all 12 atomic enumerated).\n- u24: 32/32 gate β assert top-level contract keys == 32 after u3-u23 land.\n\nOut-of-scope: Track C axis (0 frame count), V4 re-judgment, scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543 argparse refactor, figma_to_html_agent/blocks/1171281171 (non-target), Phase Z Stage 0 mdx_normalizer (locked 2026-05-08), adapter/runtime AI (calculate_fit / zone fit / Internal Region), kiwipiepy collection break (IMP-32 scope).\n\nRollback: 1 commit = 1 unit. `git revert \u003csha\u003e` restores prior CAT count; u2 revert cascades u3-u23 (VP exemption removed); u3/u4 revert restores _WIP row.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- Stage 1 EXIT (c412f1e): catalog_current=11, remaining=21, track_a_index_present=9 (incl. 2 WIP), track_b_visual_pending=12.\n- 32 V4 unique template_ids / 320 judgments (tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml).\n- CAT top-level keys = 11 (verified `grep '^[a-z][a-z_]*:' CAT` β 11).\n- WIP L20-21: F23 (1171281203) + F9 (1171281180) partials confirmed.\n- src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104 split_source enum unchanged (top_bullets, h3_subsections).\n- scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543 argparse surface (no refactor).\n- 20/12 split: index.html present/absent over 32 target block dirs.\n- Codex #6 rejection cause: u11 deferral β resolved by u12-u23 atomic enumeration.\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: YES\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T05:17:32+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T05:17:32+09:00"},{"id":22233,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22233","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #8] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b Round #2\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\nreview_result: NO\nunit_size_check: PASS\ncompact_body_check: FAIL\nmax_files_per_unit_seen: 2\nmax_estimate_lines_seen: 50\nchecked_units:\n - {id: u1, verdict: covered, reason: \"21-row inventory artifact is explicit and temp-scoped.\"}\n - {id: u2, verdict: covered, reason: \"baseline test VP exemption is sequenced before VP contracts.\"}\n - {id: u3, verdict: covered, reason: \"F23 WIP absorb includes catalog plus _WIP update.\"}\n - {id: u4, verdict: covered, reason: \"F9 WIP absorb includes catalog plus _WIP update.\"}\n - {id: u5, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F24 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u6, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F21 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u7, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F27 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u8, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F22 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u9, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F1 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u10, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F3 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u11, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F7 one-frame contract unit.\"}\n - {id: u12, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F2 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u13, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F4 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u14, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F5 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u15, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F6 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u16, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F10 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u17, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F15 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u18, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F19 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u19, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F25 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u20, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F26 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u21, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F30 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u22, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F31 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u23, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F32 contract-first VP unit.\"}\n - {id: u24, verdict: covered, reason: \"final 32/32 catalog-completeness gate.\"}\n\nBrief per-unit rationale:\nu1-u2: Inventory plus VP baseline-test sequencing is present and executable.\nu3-u11: All 9 TrackA index-present additions are atomic, including WIP F23/F9 absorb.\nu12-u23: The prior TrackB blocking gap is fixed; all 12 visual-pending frames are enumerated.\nu24: The final 32/32 gate prevents stopping at partial catalog completion.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\nTrack C, V4 re-judgment, smoke_frame_render argparse refactor, blocks/1171281171, mdx_normalizer, adapter AI, calculate_fit migration, and the kiwipiepy collection abort remain out of scope for IMP-04b implementation units.\n\nRollback strategy:\nThe proposed 1 commit = 1 unit rollback is adequate; WIP units restore both CAT and _WIP together.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `Get-Content -LiteralPath .orchestrator\\drafts\\42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r2.md`\n- `pytest -q tests`\n- `rg`/targeted reads of frame_contracts.yaml, _WIP_FILES.md, test_family_contract_baseline.py, phase_z2_mapper.py, smoke_frame_render.py, v4_full32_result.yaml, and figma_to_html_agent/blocks\n\nFiles checked:\n- `.orchestrator/drafts/42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r2.md`\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md`\n- `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py`\n- `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml`\n- `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/`\n\nTest results:\n- `pytest -q tests` failed during collection with `Fatal Python error: Aborted`; current thread abort is in `kiwipiepy._wrap.Kiwi.__init__`, imported by `tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16`. This matches the plan's IMP-32 out-of-scope note, but the required baseline is not passing.\n\nVerified facts:\n- Claude Round #2 has 24 units, max 2 files/unit, max estimate_lines 50.\n- Units cover 21 remaining frames: 9 TrackA index-present (including WIP F23/F9) plus 12 TrackB visual-pending.\n- V4 evidence file has 320 `template_id` judgments and 32 unique template_ids.\n- Current catalog has 11 top-level keys; families disk/tracked counts are 13/11; target blocks split 20 with index.html and 12 without.\n- Required baseline reads match: split_source lines 97-104, ITEM_PARSERS lines 262-265, argparse surface lines 499-543.\n- Strict compact plan requirement is not met: Claude plan body is 5,998 chars after the first-line header, exceeding the 5,000-char cap, and it includes prose/path-shortcut lines before `=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===`.\n\nrewind_target: stage_2_plan\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T05:20:43+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T05:20:43+09:00"},{"id":22236,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22236","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Claude #8] Stage 2 simulation-plan IMP-04b Round #1\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\n- {id: u1, summary: \"21-row inventory {fid,frame#,tid,V4,group,partial,order,status,source_path}\", files: [.orchestrator/tmp/imp04b_inventory.md], tests: [], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u2, summary: \"Baseline test exempts status:visual_pending (precedes u3+)\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u3, summary: \"F23 1171281203 absorb + _WIP 13-\u003e12\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u4, summary: \"F9 1171281180 absorb + _WIP 12-\u003e11\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml, templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 50}\n- {id: u5, summary: \"F24 1171281204 VP LE=1 (deep-review repr)\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 45}\n- {id: u6, summary: \"F21 1171281201 VP RS=3\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u7, summary: \"F27 1171281208 VP RS=2\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u8, summary: \"F22 1171281202 VP RS=1\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u9, summary: \"F1 1171281172 VP R0\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u10, summary: \"F3 1171281174 VP R0\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u11, summary: \"F7 1171281178 VP R0\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 40}\n- {id: u12, summary: \"F2 1171281173 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u13, summary: \"F4 1171281175 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u14, summary: \"F5 1171281176 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u15, summary: \"F6 1171281177 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u16, summary: \"F10 1171281181 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u17, summary: \"F15 1171281192 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u18, summary: \"F19 1171281197 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u19, summary: \"F25 1171281205 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u20, summary: \"F26 1171281206 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u21, summary: \"F30 1171281211 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u22, summary: \"F31 1171281212 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u23, summary: \"F32 1171281213 VP null\", files: [templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml], tests: [], estimate_lines: 35}\n- {id: u24, summary: \"32/32 gate: len(contracts)==32 AND _WIP==0\", files: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], tests: [tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py], estimate_lines: 30}\n\nRationale: u1 inventory; u2 VP exempt pre-VP; u3-4 WIP absorb (catalog+_WIP same commit); u5-11 TrackA add (V4 LEβRSβR0); u12-23 TrackB contract-FIRST (Stage 1 Q2: VP+figma_source_path:null+slots from texts.md). u5-u23 tests:[] = no NEW test added; existing baseline (modified in u2) auto-runs every commit; u24 = explicit 32/32 gate addition.\n\nOOS: TrackC, V4 re-run, smoke argparse, blocks/1171281171, mdx_normalizer, calculate_fit, AI/Kei per frame, IMP-32 kiwipiepy abort, VPβactive family HTML authoring.\n\nRollback: 1 commit=1 unit; `git revert \u003csha\u003e` reverse u24βu3βu2; baseline test fail-fast guards.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\n- catalog keys=11; V4 tids=32; 32-11=21 = 9 TrackA + 12 TrackB β\n- TrackA 9 fids: 1171281172/174/178/180(W)/201/202/203(W)/204/208\n- TrackB 12 fids: 1171281173/175/176/177/181/192/197/205/206/211/212/213\n- WIP rows: templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md L20-21\n- baseline test: tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py L46 (set-equal) / L66 (WIP-invariant)\n- tid\u003c-\u003efid: tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml (320 judgments)\n- source_comment_ids: Claude #2 Stage 1 (c412f1e) / Codex #8 Stage 2 R2 FAIL\n\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: pending Codex review\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T05:30:56+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T05:30:56+09:00"},{"id":22240,"html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42#issuecomment-22240","pull_request_url":"","issue_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin/C.E.L_Slide_test2/issues/42","user":{"id":28,"login":"Kyeongmin","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"μ΄κ²½λ―Ό","email":"kyeongmin@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/avatars/d883a35f9197b080b2a0c535c3f9357dcd5c7d40b3c42bd8f40218cb94609a8e","html_url":"https://gitea.hmac.kr/Kyeongmin","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2025-12-30T10:51:04+09:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":1,"username":"Kyeongmin"},"original_author":"","original_author_id":0,"body":"[Codex #9] Stage 2 simulation-plan review IMP-04b Round #1\n\n=== IMPLEMENTATION_UNITS ===\nreview_result: NO\nunit_size_check: PASS\ncompact_body_check: PASS\naxis_coverage_check: FAIL\nbaseline_test_check: FAIL\nmax_files_per_unit_seen: 2\nmax_estimate_lines_seen: 50\nchecked_units:\n - {id: u1, verdict: covered, reason: \"21-row inventory artifact is temp-scoped and within size.\"}\n - {id: u2, verdict: covered, reason: \"baseline test VP exemption is sequenced before VP contracts.\"}\n - {id: u3, verdict: covered, reason: \"F23 WIP absorb pairs catalog and _WIP update.\"}\n - {id: u4, verdict: covered, reason: \"F9 WIP absorb pairs catalog and _WIP update.\"}\n - {id: u5, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F24 one-frame unit.\"}\n - {id: u6, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F21 one-frame unit.\"}\n - {id: u7, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F27 one-frame unit.\"}\n - {id: u8, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F22 one-frame unit.\"}\n - {id: u9, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F1 one-frame unit.\"}\n - {id: u10, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F3 one-frame unit.\"}\n - {id: u11, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackA F7 one-frame unit.\"}\n - {id: u12, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F2 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u13, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F4 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u14, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F5 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u15, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F6 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u16, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F10 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u17, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F15 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u18, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F19 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u19, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F25 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u20, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F26 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u21, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F30 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u22, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F31 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u23, verdict: covered, reason: \"TrackB F32 contract-first unit.\"}\n - {id: u24, verdict: covered, reason: \"final 32/32 plus WIP-zero gate.\"}\n\nBrief per-unit rationale:\nu1-u4 are correctly ordered: inventory, VP baseline change, then the two WIP absorbs.\nu5-u23 enumerate all 21 remaining frames as atomic contract units, satisfying the 1 commit = 1 contract guardrail.\nu24 provides the catalog-completeness gate, but the plan no longer states every issue-body pre-flight axis in the compact body.\n\nOut-of-scope notes:\nTrack C, V4 re-run, smoke argparse refactor, blocks/1171281171, mdx_normalizer, calculate_fit, AI/Kei calls, and IMP-32 helper extraction remain out of scope.\n\nRollback strategy:\n1 commit = 1 unit rollback is adequate; WIP units must revert catalog and _WIP_FILES.md together.\n\n=== EVIDENCE ===\nCommands run:\n- `Get-Content .orchestrator\\tmp\\codex_prompt.txt`\n- `Get-Content .orchestrator\\drafts\\42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r1.md`\n- Counted compact body chars, units, estimate_lines, catalog keys, V4 template_ids, block index coverage, family file counts, and WIP rows\n- Targeted reads of `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`, `src/phase_z2_mapper.py`, `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py`, `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md`\n- `pytest -q tests`\n\nFiles checked:\n- `.orchestrator/drafts/42_stage_simulation-plan_claude_r1.md`\n- `templates/phase_z2/catalog/frame_contracts.yaml`\n- `tests/matching/v4_full32_result.yaml`\n- `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/`\n- `templates/phase_z2/families/_WIP_FILES.md`\n- `tests/test_family_contract_baseline.py`\n- `src/phase_z2_mapper.py`\n- `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py`\n\nTest results:\n- `pytest -q tests`: FAIL, fatal Python abort during collection in `kiwipiepy._wrap.Kiwi.__init__`, imported by `tests/matching/pipeline_04a_smoke_test.py:16`.\n\nVerified facts:\n- Revised Claude plan body is 4,802 chars after the first-line header and has 24 units; max estimate_lines is 50 and max files/unit is 2.\n- Current catalog has 11 top-level keys; V4 evidence has 320 judgments and 32 unique template_ids.\n- Target blocks split as 32 dirs excluding `1171281171`: 20 with `index.html`, 12 without.\n- Family HTML files are 11 tracked and 13 on disk; WIP rows name F23 `1171281203` and F9 `1171281180`.\n- The plan covers the 9 TrackA + 12 TrackB frame list, but its compact body omits explicit issue-axis coverage for `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:97-104`, `src/phase_z2_mapper.py:262-265`, `scripts/smoke_frame_render.py:499-543`, and per-frame 4-layer source paths under `figma_to_html_agent/blocks/{fid}/`.\n\nrewind_target: stage_2_plan\nFINAL_CONSENSUS: NO\n","assets":[],"created_at":"2026-05-21T05:36:56+09:00","updated_at":"2026-05-21T05:36:56+09:00"}]